1
|
Petro E, Perumal-Pillay V, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, van den Ham HA, Suleman F. Evaluation of alignment of the reimbursement medicines list for children in Albania with the WHO essential medicines list for children. J Pharm Policy Pract 2023; 17:2290100. [PMID: 38205189 PMCID: PMC10775712 DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2023.2290100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The WHO Essential Medicine List for Children was released on the 30th anniversary of the general Essential Medicine List in 2007, to recognise special needs for medicines in children, and to promote the inclusion of paediatric medicines in national procurement programmes. This study aimed to investigate the alignment of the medicines included in the Albanian reimbursement medicines list of the Mandatory Healthcare Insurance Fund (AMHIF) and the Essential Medicine List for Children. Methods A quantitative evaluation was performed to compare the paediatric medicines included in the 2022 list of the AMHIF and the 2021 WHO Essential Medicine List for Children. In addition, vaccines in the Albanian vaccination programmes for children were compared to the ones listed on the WHO Essential Medicine List for Children. Results Both lists had a total of 284 active ingredients in common, whereas 14 of 24 vaccines were found to be in common in the Essential Medicine List for Children list and the Albanian vaccination programmes. Conclusions This is the first study in Albania to investigate the alignment of the WHO EMLc and AMHIF list. In case of the same active ingredient there were many deviations in terms of dosage form, strength and indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Petro
- Local Healthcare Unit, Durres, Albania
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - V. Perumal-Pillay
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Evidence Based Practice, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - A. K. Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H. A. van den Ham
- Utrecht WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F. Suleman
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Evidence Based Practice, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petrella A, Fortinguerra F, Cangini A, Pierantozzi A, Trotta F. Access and use of WHO essential medicines in Italy. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1211208. [PMID: 37881343 PMCID: PMC10595003 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1211208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many countries use the WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) as a guide for health policy choices to promote the efficient use of healthcare resources or adopt the concept of essential medicines (EMs) to develop their own national list of essential medicines. The aim of this study is to analyse the availability and use of medicines included in the 22nd WHO EML in Italy. Methods Using the ATC code (5th level), a comparison was made between the medicines included in the WHO EML and those retrieved from the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) database. The availability (regulatory and reimbursement status) of EMs, as well as the market share in expenditure (million euros) and consumption [measured in WHO-defined daily doses (DDDs)], compared to all reimbursed medicines in 2021, were analysed. Results In 2021, approximately 85.2% (n = 414) of medicines included in the WHO EML were commonly marketed in Italy. Of these, 396 EMs were fully reimbursed by the Italian National Healthcare Service (INHS), corresponding to 81.5% (396/486) of the WHO EML, while the remaining 18.5% (90/486) were neither authorised (n = 72) nor reimbursed (n = 18). The study found a low coverage for anti-parasitic, insecticides, and repellent products (ATC P) in addition to medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones (ATC G). Even though medicines on the WHO EML, including therapeutic alternatives, accounted for ~48.5% of the expenditure for medicines reimbursed by INHS, the list covered 74% of all national drug consumed. Novel high-cost therapies indicated in high-prevalence diseases and rare conditions, mostly antineoplastic and immune-modulating agents (ATC L) not included in the WHO EML, were also guaranteed. Conclusions In Italy, high coverage of EMs was found. It was largely reimbursed by the INHS, even when compared to other European countries. Essential medicines represented a high percentage of the overall expenditure and consumption in Italy. The WHO EML could be an important tool to guide the health policy choices of high-income countries, although a more frequent update and easier access to information on rejected medicines are needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Alabdullah MN, Alabdullah H, Kamel S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of evidence-based medicine among resident physicians in hospitals of Syria: a cross-sectional study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:785. [PMID: 36376824 PMCID: PMC9661745 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03840-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is to integrate the best research evidence with our clinical expertise, circumstances, and unique values of our patient. However, there are no studies about using EBM in clinical practice among resident doctors in Syria. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the self-reported knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of EBM by resident doctors throughout different teaching hospitals in Syria. METHODS The study is a cross-sectional. A self-reported online questionnaire was used to collect data about KAP of EBM from 214 resident physicians working in secondary and tertiary teaching hospitals. The study was conducted between September 2021 and February 2022. All data were analyzed using SPSS, and non-parametric statistical tests were used to identify the correlation between different variables and make the necessary comparisons. RESULTS Two hundred and fourteen physicians responded to the questionnaire with a response rate of 85.6%. The overall mean scores of KAP of EBM were 59.2, 74.3 and 53.9%, respectively. The participants displayed a low level of awareness of resources and statistical terms used in EBM. The most well-known resources for residents were Up To Date and PubMed. Among the participants, pediatric residents achieved the highest score in practicing EBM, while family medicine residents scored the lowest score. CONCLUSION The overall impression about the KAP of EBM among Syrian residents was as following: weak awareness, neutral attitude and poor practice of EBM. Training workshops should be set up to teach residents the skills needed to move from opinion-based practice to evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Nour Alabdullah
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Al-Mowassat University Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Hadi Alabdullah
- Faculty of Medicine, Hama University, Hama, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Sondos Kamel
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hama University, Hama, Syrian Arab Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tokalić R, Viđak M, Kaknjo MM, Marušić A. Antifragility of healthcare systems in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Learning from man-made and natural crises. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2021; 9:100216. [PMID: 34693390 PMCID: PMC8513139 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Acute crises, such as a war or a pandemic, are the ultimate tests for health care systems' resilience (temporary response to stress with change and adaptation) and antifragility (permanent benefit from change in response to stress). In this Health Policy paper, we analyse and discuss how the healthcare systems of two European countries - Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia - adapted to war as a man-made disaster, and how they adapted to COVID-19 pandemic twenty-five years later. These countries experienced full scale wars in recent history, which significantly changed their political and healthcare systems. This experience prepared the countries for the response to the pandemic, which coincided with two earthquakes in Croatia. We argue that healthcare systems in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina are not only resilient but antifragile, and that they benefited from stressors they were exposed to. The antifragility of the two systems were primarily based on human effort - the strength, adaptability and resilience of health care professionals. We will look at lessons from the wars that were applied to the pandemic and discuss newly recognized opportunities and improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ružica Tokalić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Marin Viđak
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Mersiha Mahmić Kaknjo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ana Marušić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catic T, Jusufovic R, Tabakovic V. Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Antiepileptic Reimbursement for Neuropathic Pain in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Budget Impact Analysis of Pregabalin. Mater Sociomed 2018; 30:89-94. [PMID: 30061795 PMCID: PMC6029914 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2018.30.89-94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Neuropathic pain resulting from injury to the nervous system. Up to 7% to 8% of the European population is affected. A number of different treatments for neuropathic pain have been studied including antiepileptic. Pregabalin and gabapentin are often considered first-line treatments. Pregabalin provides equivalent efficacy to gabapentin, showing greater potency at much lower doses and is considered as cost-effective intervention. In Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB&H), gabapentin is fully reimbursed, while pregabalin is enlisted on list B with copayment. Aim: To develop simple budget impact (BI) model and assess BI of introducing pregabalin into full reimbursement in FB&H. Material and methods: Budget impact model was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010. Local epidemiology data and data on drug consumption from government reports in 2016 were used. Two scenarios with three-year time horizon have been developed: 1) without and 2) with pregabalin reimbursed at the same level as gabapentin. Two developed scenarios have been compared from health insurance fund (HIF) perspective. Results: In scenario 1 consider both drugs fully reimbursement and without patient switch among alternatives the total cost would be increased for 780,025 KM; 852,027 KM and 943,830 KM over a 3-year period. In scenario 2 considering both drugs fully reimbursed but with patient switch topregabalin total annual cost would be increased for 732,241 KM; 742,395 KM and 751,761 KM. Comparing scenario 1 and 2 it is found that scenario 2 is more favorable from HIF perspective. Conclusion: Implementation of pharmacoeconomic principles in reimbursement decisions in Bosnia and Herzegovina would improve access to medicines and contribute rationale resource consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Catic
- Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Rasim Jusufovic
- Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Medical School, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Vedad Tabakovic
- Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahmić-Kaknjo M, Jeličić-Kadić A, Utrobičić A, Chan K, Bero L, Marušić A. Essential medicines availability is still suboptimal in many countries: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 98:41-52. [PMID: 29452222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify uses of WHO Model list of essential medicines (EMs) and summarize studies examining EM and national EM lists (NEMLs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In this scoping review, we searched PubMed, Scopus, WHO website and WHO Regional Databases for studies on NEMLs, reimbursement medicines lists, and WHO EML, with no date or language restrictions. RESULTS Three thousand one hundred forty-four retrieved documents were independently screened by two reviewers; 100 full-text documents were analyzed; 37 contained data suitable for quantitative and qualitative analysis on EMs availability (11 documents), medicines for specific diseases (13 documents), and comparison of WHO EML and NEMLs (13 documents). From the latter, two documents analyzed the relevance of evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews for medicines that were on NEMLs but not on the WHO EML. EMs availability is still suboptimal in low-income countries. Availability of children formulations and EMs for specific diseases such as chronic, cancer, pain, and reproductive health is suboptimal even in middle-income countries. CONCLUSION WHO EML can be used as a basic set of medicines for different settings. More evidence is needed into how NEMLs can contribute to better availability of children formulations, pain, and cancer medicines in developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Crkvice 67, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Fakultetska 3, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Antonia Jeličić-Kadić
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Ana Utrobičić
- Central Medical Library, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Kit Chan
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, EH8 9 AG Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Lisa Bero
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Ana Marušić
- Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN CENTRAL-EASTERN AND SOUTH EUROPE COUNTRIES: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:390-395. [PMID: 28434417 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe the healthcare system and health financing in Bosnia and Herzegovina and recent trends in health technology assessment (HTA) placement in the system. METHODS A short review of PubMed published literature has been conducted using key words related to reimbursement, HTA, and health policy. We also revised legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina published in Official Gazettes related to healthcare financing and organization. RESULTS A deecentralized system in Bosnia and Herzegovina led to high differences in health policy. HTA has been recognized in legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but it still has not been introduced in practice in full capacity. A small number of publications are found in PubMed treating these issues, but generally the problem of introduction of HTA in Bosnia and Herzegovina is lack of experts, as well as the political environment and education in this field. CONCLUSIONS HTA in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Srpska has a short history because of a huge political impact in the decision-making process, decentralized system, and multiple decision makers in these regions. Challenges remain in assessments, in development of more transparent approaches in different areas of the health system in these regions, and in consistent application of appropriate standards especially in education of professionals who will provide establishment of HTA in the health system of The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Srpska.
Collapse
|
8
|
Catic T, Lekic L, Zah V, Tabakovic V. Budget Impact of Introducing Linagliptin into Bosnia and Herzegovina Health Insurance Drug Reimbursement List in 2016-2018. Mater Sociomed 2017; 29:176-181. [PMID: 29109662 PMCID: PMC5644199 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.176-181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes is reaching epidemiological scales worldwide. Beside health implications diabetes bears significant financial impact on health systems. Different treatment options aiming to prevent diabetes complications are available. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitors like linagliptin are usually add-on therapy to metformin in order to achieve glycemic control. Expenditure for oral antidiabetic medicines in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) is low accounting for only 2.53% of the total drug market expenditure. Linagliptin is not reimbursed in B&H mainly due to it’s perception of high cost medication. Aim: To assess budget impact (BI) of introducing linagliptin into health insurance reimbursement list in B&H through development of the budget impact model (BIM). Material and methods: Budget impact model was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 based on current legislation and practice in B&H. Local epidemiology data and data on drug consumption from government reports in 2014 were used. Two scenarios with three-year time horizon have been developed: 1) without and 2) with linagliptin reimbursed and compared. Results: Inclusion of linagliptin into reimbursement list in Canton Sarajevo and Canton Tuzla would have positive budget impact on national level of B&H resulting in total savings of 18,194€, 235,570€ and 699,472€, in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. Conclusion: Introduction of linagliptin into reimbursement list would decrease total costs for DPP-4 inhibitors and is favorable for positive decision on reimbursement in B&H. Applying BIM in decision making would assure better allocation and planning of resources at any region or administrative level in B&H.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Catic
- Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Lana Lekic
- Faculty for pharmacy University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Vlad Zah
- ZRx Outcomes Research Inc., Toronto, Canada
| | - Vedad Tabakovic
- Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mahmic-Kaknjo M, Novo A, Krleza-Jeric K. FIRST BH COCHRANE SYMPOSIUM HELD. Mater Sociomed 2016; 28:74-6. [PMID: 27047274 PMCID: PMC4789626 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.74-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The first BH Cochrane Symposium was held on 12 October 2015 in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH), organized by the Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare in Federation of BH (AKAZ) and Medical Faculty University of Sarajevo. A group of ten national and international experts presented the Cochrane organization and systematic reviews, as well as the IMPACT Observatory, development of guidelines in BH, and the role of AKAZ. Examples of the development and use of Cochrane reviews in evidence informed decision making in health as well as research integrity were presented and discussed. Major BH decision makers and interested professionals from all over BH participated in a symposium and its lively discussion, especially from the perspective of Cochrane and its activities in BH, and the collaboration with the Croatian Cochrane. It can be expected that this symposium will inspire further growth of participation and use of Cochrane in BH and increase the awareness of various aspects of evidence informed medicine and research integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mersiha Mahmic-Kaknjo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ahmed Novo
- Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahmić-Kaknjo M, Kadić D, Hodžić H, Spahić-Sarajlić S, Hadžić E, Ademović E. Awareness, knowledge, use, and attitudes toward evidence based medicine in a developing country: survey of physicians in a canton in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croat Med J 2016; 56:558-66. [PMID: 26718762 PMCID: PMC4707927 DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To assess awareness, knowledge, use, and attitudes toward evidence-based medicine (EBM) and The Cochrane Library (CL) among physicians from Zenica-Doboj Canton (ZDC), Bosnia and Herzegovina. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a self-administered anonymous questionnaire was sent by post to all state owned health institutions (2 hospitals and 11 Primary Health Care Institutions) in ZDC. The main outcome measures were physicians’ awareness of the Cochrane, awareness and use of CL, access to EBM databases, and access to internet at work. 358 of 559 physicians responded (63.69%). Results 23.18% of respondents stated they had access to EBM databases, but only 3.91% named the actual EBM databases they used. The question on the highest level of evidence in EBM was correctly answered by 35.7% respondents, 34.64% heard about Cochrane and 32.68% heard about CL. They obtained information about CL mostly on the internet and from colleagues, whereas the information about EBM was obtained mainly during continuous medical education. Conclusion Although the attitudes toward EBM are positive, there is a low awareness of EBM among physicians in ZDC. Open access to the CL should be used more. Educational interventions in popularizing EBM and Cochrane are needed to raise awareness both among students and practicing physicians, and finally among lay audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo
- Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Crkvice 67, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Essential Medicines in a High Income Country: Essential to Whom? PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143654. [PMID: 26650544 PMCID: PMC4674059 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the perspectives of a diverse group of stakeholders engaged in medicines decision making around what constitutes an “essential” medicine, and how the Essential Medicines List (EML) concept functions in a high income country context. Methods In-depth qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 Australian stakeholders, recognised as decision makers, leaders or advisors in the area of medicines reimbursement or supply chain management. Participants were recruited from government, pharmaceutical industry, pharmaceutical wholesale/distribution companies, medicines non-profit organisations, academic health disciplines, hospitals, and consumer groups. Perspectives on the definition and application of the EML concept in a high income country context were thematically analysed using grounded theory approach. Findings Stakeholders found it challenging to describe the EML concept in the Australian context because many perceived it was generally used in resource scarce settings. Stakeholders were unable to distinguish whether nationally reimbursed medicines were essential medicines in Australia. Despite frequent generic drug shortages and high prices paid by consumers, many struggled to describe how the EML concept applied to Australia. Instead, broad inclusion of consumer needs, such as rare and high cost medicines, and consumer involvement in the decision making process, has led to expansive lists of nationally subsidised medicines. Therefore, improved communication and coordination is needed around shared interests between stakeholders regarding how medicines are prioritised and guaranteed in the supply chain. Conclusions This study showed that decision-making in Australia around reimbursement of medicines has strayed from the fundamental utilitarian concept of essential medicines. Many stakeholders involved in medicine reimbursement decisions and management of the supply chain did not consider the EML concept in their approach. The wide range of views of what stakeholders considered were essential medicines, challenges whether the EML concept is out-dated or underutilised in high income countries.
Collapse
|