Metamizole (dipyrone)-associated agranulocytosis. An analysis of German spontaneous reports 1990-2012

The Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Vitreoretinal Surgeries with Preemptive Paracetamol/Metamizole

Despite the possibility of postoperative pain occurrence, in some patients, vitreoretinal surgeries (VRSs) require performance of general anesthesia (GA). The administration of intraoperative intravenous rescue opioid analgesics (IROA) during GA constitutes a risk of perioperative adverse events. The Adequacy of Anesthesia (AoA) concept consists of an entropy electroencephalogram to guide the depth of GA and surgical pleth index (SPI) to optimize the titration of IROA. Preemptive analgesia (PA) using cyclooxygenase-3 (COX-3) inhibitors is added to GA to minimize the demand for IROA and reduce postoperative pain. The current analysis evaluated the advantage of PA using COX-3 inhibitors added to GA with AoA-guided administration of IROA on the rate of postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing VRS. A total of 165 patients undergoing VRS were randomly allocated to receive either GA with AoA-guided IROA administration with intravenous paracetamol/metamizole or with preemptive paracetamol or metamizole. Preemptive paracetamol resulted in a reduction in the IROA requirement; both preemptive metamizole/paracetamol resulted in a reduced rate of postoperative pain as compared to metamizole alone. We recommend using intraoperative AOA-guided IROA administration during VRS to ensure hemodynamic stability alongside PA using both paracetamol/metamizole to reduce postoperative pain.

Facts and trends in dental antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions in Germany, 2012-2021

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to overview German dentists' development of antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions from 2012 to 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal database analysis was performed based on the annual reports of the "Research Institute for Local Health Care Systems" (WIdO, Berlin).

RESULTS

From 2012 until 2021, dental antibiotic prescriptions fell by 17.9%. In contrast, the dental proportion of antibiotic prescriptions compared to all antibiotic prescriptions in Germany increased from 9.1 to 13.6%. Aminopenicillins enhanced their share from 35.6 to 49.4%, while clindamycin prescriptions declined from 37.8 to 23.4%. The proportion of ibuprofen prescriptions significantly increased from 60.4% in 2012 to 79.0% in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2013, the most frequently prescribed antibiotic by German dentists has been amoxicillin reaching nearly half of all dental antibiotic prescriptions in 2021. Simultaneously, the proportion of clindamycin has steadily decreased, but the level is still high compared to international data. During the past decade, ibuprofen as a first-line analgesic in German dentistry was continuously gaining in importance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Aminopenicillins have the best risk-benefit balance in dentistry, but the use of antibiotics generally must be limited only to cases of severe infections or compromised patients. Pre-existing diseases or permanent medications should always be considered when choosing an analgesic.

Environmental occurrence, risk, and removal strategies of pyrazolones: A critical review

Pyrazolones, widely used as analgesic and anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals, have become a significant concern because of their persistence and widespread presence in engineered (e.g., wastewater treatment plants) and natural environments. Thus, the urgent task is to ensure the effective and cost-efficient removal of pyrazolones. Advanced oxidation processes are the most commonly used removal method. Furthermore, the biodegradation of pyrazolones has been exploited using microbial communities or pure strains; however, screening for efficient degrading bacteria and clarifying the biodegradation mechanisms required further research. In this critical review, we overview the environmental occurrence of pyrazolones, their potential ecological health risks, and their corresponding removal techniques (e.g., O3 oxidation, photocatalysis, and Fenton-like process). We also emphasize the prospects for the risk and contamination control of pyrazolones in various environments using physicochemical-biochemical coupling technology. Collectively, the environmental occurrence of pyrazolones poses significant public health concerns, necessitating heightened attention and the implementation of effective methods to minimize their environmental risks.

Metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA): a mini review

Metamizole is an analgesic, antipyretic, and spasmolytic drug in Germany only approved for the treatment of severe pain or high fever that does not respond to other measures. In recent years, an increased use has been described among both adults and children, often against the approved indication. The most important side effect of metamizole is the development of agranulocytosis (neutrophil count < 500/µL). Incidence of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA) ranges depending on the study from 0.96 cases per million per year to 1:1602 per patient and metamizole prescription. The risk of agranulocytosis in children remains unclear, but is probably lower than in adults. Female gender and older age are associated with higher incidence, reflecting prescription distribution. MIA is dose-independent and risk seems to increase with duration of intake. In patients with past exposure, re-exposure may lead to rapid onset. MIA is believed to be induced either through immunologic or toxic mechanisms. MIA presents with fever, sore throat, fatigue, and mucosal inflammation, up to ulceration. Even in the case of suspected MIA, treatment with metamizole should be immediately paused and an examination of the blood cell count is required. In case of local or systemic infections, empirical therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics should be administered. G-CSF therapy should be limited to patients with poor prognostic factors. The patient should be monitored closely until the neutrophil count returns to normal. Re-exposure to metamizole must be avoided.

Case Report: Simultaneously Induced Neutropenia and Hemolysis After a Single Metamizole Dose

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Metamizole is a non-opioid ampyrone sulfonate compound with potent analgesic, antipyretic, and spasmolytic effects. Agranulocytosis is a rare life-threatening complication of metamizole.

CASE

Here, we present the case of a 62-year-old patient who developed agranulocytosis as well as hemolysis after a single administration of metamizole.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the inherent allergic potential of metamizole and its effects on different hematopoietic cell types.

Differences in Need for Opioids After Sinonasal Surgery at Day of Surgery and in the Postoperative Period

INTRODUCTION

In the last years, the use of opioid analgesics has increased, as well as their morbidity and mortality, especially in the United States. Most patients after sinonasal surgery receive opioid analgesics, although up to 90% have leftover opioid pills. Around 70% of these patients keep the opioid analgesics, which could possibly lead to improper use. The objective of the following study was the investigation of the need for, use of, timing and side effects of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after sinonasal surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of (n = 280) patients who underwent sinonasal surgery in the Otolaryngology Department of the University Erlangen-Nürnberg between January and December 2018. The postoperative pain (3-5 days after surgery) using the numeric rating scale and the postoperative need for on-demand opioids and non-opioid analgesics in relation to demographic and surgical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of total, 59.64% of all patients received opioid analgesics postoperatively on the day of surgery. On the first postoperative day (POD1), the mean pain score yielded the highest values; however, only 0.71% of the patients needed opioid analgesics, and pain was sufficiently controlled with non-opioids or no pain medication at all. There was a significant reduction of the pain score from POD2 to 5 (P = .01; P < .01, respectively). Only 1.8% of the patients needed an opioid analgesic from POD1-5. Of total, 2.1% of the patients presented with a postoperative bleeding complication, and only 1 (0.4%) patient needed endoscopic coagulation.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the majority of patients need opioid analgesics almost exclusively on the day of surgery. There were no major complications in patients taking either opioid or non-opioids. Our results indicate that the postoperative pain regimen from POD1 should initially be started using non-opioid analgesics and be further escalated to opioid analgesics in individual cases.

A Case Report on Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?

Metamizole is a drug with analgesic and antipyretic properties widely available in Portugal. Its use is highly controversial because of the risk of agranulocytosis, a rare but serious adverse event. A 70-year-old female patient with a recent history of treatment with metamizole for post-surgery fever and pain presented to the ED with sustained fever, diarrhea, and painful mouth ulcers. Laboratory tests revealed agranulocytosis. The patient was placed under protective isolation and started treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and empiric antibiotic therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin for neutropenic fever. After an extensive workup, no source of infection was identified. During hospitalization, infectious and neoplastic causes of agranulocytosis were investigated, but the results were negative. Metamizole-induced agranulocytosis was suspected. The patient completed a total of three days of G-CSF and eight days of empiric antibiotic therapy with sustained clinical improvement. She was discharged completely asymptomatic and remained clinically stable during follow-up without a resurgence of agranulocytosis. This case report is intended to increase awareness of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis. While this is a well-known side effect, it is also often overlooked. It is paramount that both physicians and patients know how to correctly manage metamizole to prevent and promptly treat agranulocytosis.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Children: Comparison of Reports Collected in a Pharmacovigilance Project Versus Spontaneously Collected ADR Reports

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and medication errors in children may result from a lack of appropriate drugs, dosages, and pharmaceutical forms. In addition, children may respond differently to drugs than adults. Reporting of ADRs in the pediatric population is therefore of importance in order to increase the amount of safety data. However, different methodological approaches are used to collect ADRs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to analyze whether there were differences in the ADRs collected in the KiDSafe project (845 ADR reports) compared with the spontaneous ADR reports sent to EudraVigilance (697 reports) in the same time period. The strengths and limitations of these two different approaches should be discussed.

METHODS

The same inclusion criteria were applied for the systematically collected ADRs in the KiDSafe project and the spontaneous reports from EudraVigilance, and only reports of ADRs coded with hospitalization were considered. In both datasets, the number of reports (related to number of hospitals), their documentation quality (VigiGrade), causal relationship (World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre [WHO-UMC] criteria), most frequently reported drugs and ADRs, demographical parameters of the patients, reported medical histories, and the seriousness of ADR reports were analyzed descriptively. The results of the two analyses were compared.

RESULTS

There was considerable underreporting of ADRs via the spontaneous reports (0.4 reports per hospital; 697/1902) compared with 70.4 reports per hospital (845/12) in the systematically collected KiDSafe reports. Documentation quality assessment yielded similar results in both datasets. Among the 10 most frequently reported drugs, anticonvulsants such as levetiracetam (6.6%), valproic acid (5.6%), oxcarbazepine (3.6%), and lamotrigine (3.4%) were mainly reported in the KiDSafe reports, while in the EudraVigilance reports, mite allergen extract (4.4%) and allergens (3.6%) were preferentially reported. Seizures were the most frequently reported clinically specific ADRs in the KiDSafe reports, whereas anaphylactic reactions and urticaria were prominent in the spontaneous reports from EudraVigilance. Notably, the proportion of reports referring to medication errors and other medication safety related issues were more prominent in KiDSafe than in the spontaneous reports (27.8% vs. 12.6% and 46.0% vs. 29.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In general, reports from both data sources contributed to the identification of ADRs and dedicated issues related to drug therapy. However, these differed by nature and strength of the signal, likely due to the characteristics of the individual method. A combined approach could likely compensate for limitations inherent to the single approaches, but will most likely only be applied to dedicated pharmacovigilance topics or research objectives.

Metamizole Use in Children: Analysis of Drug Utilisation and Adverse Drug Reactions at a German University Hospital between 2015 and 2020

BACKGROUND

Metamizole use is controversially discussed due to its potentially serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In Germany, however, it remains a popular analgesic and antipyretic drug.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to discuss the safety profile of metamizole in children by analysing the inpatient prescription patterns and presenting the metamizole-related ADRs at a paediatric hospital between 2015 and 2020.

METHODS

Metamizole utilisation data were retrospectively analysed from electronic medical records. ADRs were prospectively recorded via the hospital's stimulated reporting system and analysed accordingly. Patients aged < 18 years admitted to one of the general wards of the department of paediatrics and adolescent medicine of a German university hospital between June 2015 and May 2020 who received at least one drug therapy within their inpatient stay were included in the analysis. Causality of ADRs was rated according to the World Health Organisation causality assessment.

RESULTS

In 31.7% (3759/11,857) of the inpatient stays of 7809 patients, metamizole was administered. Metamizole exposure was highest in adolescents (37.9%) and lowest in newborns (9.9%). Overall, metamizole was administered parenterally in about 90%. Three cases of agranulocytosis, one allergic shock and one rash with possible or higher causality to metamizole treatment were reported. Three of these occurred prior to hospitalisation. All patients recovered without remaining harm.

DISCUSSION

Metamizole is commonly used in paediatric inpatients in Germany. Serious ADRs occur but rarely. Continuous monitoring of drug therapy through, for example, stimulated reporting systems ensures that serious ADRs are detected, and appropriate interventions can be introduced.

Excess Mortality in Aspirin and Dipyrone (Metamizole) Co-Medicated in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study

Background

Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome.

Methods and Results

We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin‐dipyrone co‐medication compared with aspirin‐alone medication. Permanent aspirin‐alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin–dipyrone co‐medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin–dipyrone co‐medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin‐only group versus 24.4% in the co‐medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56–1.76], P<0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05–1.32]; P=0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11–1.35]; P<0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82).

Conclusions

In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co‐medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co‐medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin‐treated patients for secondary prevention.

Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days.

ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING

This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04111315.

Comparative Effects of Metamizole (Dipyrone) and Naproxen on Renal Function and Prostacyclin Synthesis in Salt-Depleted Healthy Subjects - A Randomized Controlled Parallel Group Study

Aim: The objective was to investigate the effect of metamizole on renal function in healthy, salt-depleted volunteers. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of the four major metamizole metabolites were assessed and correlated with the pharmacodynamic effect using urinary excretion of the prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto-prostaglandin F1α. Methods: Fifteen healthy male volunteers were studied in an open-label randomized controlled parallel group study. Eight subjects received oral metamizole 1,000 mg three times daily and seven subjects naproxen 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. All subjects were on a low sodium diet (50 mmol sodium/day) starting 1 week prior to dosing until the end of the study. Glomerular filtration rate was measured using inulin clearance. Urinary excretion of sodium, potassium, creatinine, 6-keto-prostaglandin F1α, and pharmacokinetic parameters of naproxen and metamizole metabolites were assessed after the first and after repeated dosing. Results: In moderately sodium-depleted healthy subjects, single or multiple dose metamizole or naproxen did not significantly affect inulin and creatinine clearance or sodium excretion. Both drugs reduced renal 6-keto-prostaglandin F1α excretion after single and repeated dosing. The effect started 2 h after intake, persisted for the entire dosing period and correlated with the concentration-profile of naproxen and the active metamizole metabolite 4-methylaminoantipyrine (4-MAA). PKPD modelling indicated less potent COX-inhibition by 4-MAA (EC₅₀ 0.69 ± 0.27 µM) compared with naproxen (EC₅₀ 0.034 ± 0.033 µM). Conclusions: Short term treatment with metamizole or naproxen has no significant effect on renal function in moderately sodium depleted healthy subjects. At clinically relevant doses, 4-MAA and naproxen both inhibit COX-mediated renal prostacyclin synthesis.

Drug-Induced Idiosyncratic Agranulocytosis - Infrequent but Dangerous

Drug-induced agranulocytosis is a life-threatening side effect that usually manifests as a severe form of neutropenia associated with fever or signs of sepsis. It can occur as a problem in the context of therapy with a wide variety of drug classes. Numerous drugs are capable of triggering the rare idiosyncratic form of agranulocytosis, which, unlike agranulocytosis induced by cytotoxic drugs in cancer chemotherapy, is characterised by “bizzare” type B or hypersensitivity reactions, poor predictability and a mainly low incidence. The idiosyncratic reactions are thought to be initiated by chemically reactive drugs or reactive metabolites that react with proteins and may subsequently elicit an immune response, particularly directed against neutrophils and their precursors. Cells or organs that exhibit specific metabolic and biotransformation activity are therefore frequently affected. In this review, we provide an update on the understanding of drug-induced idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Using important triggering drugs as examples, we will summarise and discuss the chemical, the biotransformation-related, the mechanistic and the therapeutic basis of this clinically relevant and undesirable side effect.

NAT2 polymorphisms as a cause of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis

Metamizole is a widely prescribed NSAID with excellent analgesic and antipyretic properties. Although very effective, it is banned in some countries because of the risk for severe agranulocytosis. We here describe three patients with metamizole-associated agranulocytosis. Patient #1 suffered from agranulocytosis and tonsillitis followed by severe sepsis by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation. Her dizygotic twin sister (patient #2) also suffered from agranulocytosis after a surgical intervention. Patient #3 initially had a tonsillitis and also developed neutropenia after metamizole intake. For all patients, pharmacogenetic diagnostic for the genes CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and NAT2, which are involved in metamizole metabolism and degradation of toxic metabolites, was initiated. Pharmacogenetic analysis revealed NAT2 slow acetylator phenotype in all three patients. Additionally, patient #2 is an intermediate metabolizer for CYP2C19 and patient #3 is a poor metabolizer for CYP2C9. Impairment of these enzymes causes a reduced degradation of toxic metabolites, for example, 4-methylaminoantipyrine (4-MAA) or 4-aminoantipyrine. The metabolite 4-MAA can complex with hemin, which is an early breakdown product during hemolysis. Hemolysis is often observed during invasive infections or after surgical procedures. It is known that the 4-MAA/hemin complex can induce cytotoxicity in the bone marrow and interrupt granulocyte maturation. In conclusion, metamizole-induced agranulocytosis most likely was a consequence of the underlying genetical predisposition, that is, polymorphisms in the genes NAT2, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Hemolysis may have increased the toxicity of metamizole metabolites.

[Perioperative analgesia with nonopioid analgesics : Joint interdisciplinary consensus-based recommendations of the German Pain Society, the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the German Society of Surgery]

BACKGROUND

Nonopioid analgesics are frequently used for perioperative analgesia; however, insufficient research is available on several practical issues. Often hospitals have no strategy for how to proceed, e.g., for informing patients or for the timing of perioperative administration of nonopioid analgesics.

METHODS

An expert panel representing the German national societies of pain, anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine and surgery developed recommendations for the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics within a formal, structured consensus process.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that nonopioid analgesics shall be part of a multimodal analgesia concept and that patients have to be informed preoperatively about possible complications and alternative treatment options. Patients' history of pain and analgesic intake shall be evaluated. Patients at risk of severe postoperative pain and possible chronification of postsurgical pain shall be identified. Depending on the duration of surgery, nonopioid analgesics can already be administered preoperatively or intraoperatively so that plasma concentrations are sufficient after emergence from anesthesia. Nonopioid analgesics or combinations of analgesics shall be administered for a limited time only. An interdisciplinary written standard of care, comprising the nonopioid analgesic of choice, possible alternatives, adequate dosing and timing of administration as well as surgery-specific policies, have to be agreed upon by all departments involved. At discharge, the patient's physician shall be informed of analgesics given and those necessary after discharge. Patients shall be informed of possible side effects and symptoms and timely discontinuation of analgesic drugs.

CONCLUSION

The use of nonopioid analgesics as part of a perioperative multimodal concept should be approved and established as an interdisciplinary and interprofessional concept for the adequate treatment of postoperative pain.

[Perioperative analgesia with nonopioid analgesics : Joint interdisciplinary consensus-based recommendations of the German Pain Society, the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the German Society of Surgery]

BACKGROUND

Nonopioid analgesics are frequently used for perioperative analgesia; however, insufficient research is available on several practical issues. Often hospitals have no strategy for how to proceed, e.g., for informing patients or for the timing of perioperative administration of nonopioid analgesics.

METHODS

An expert panel representing the German national societies of pain, anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine and surgery developed recommendations for the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics within a formal, structured consensus process.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that nonopioid analgesics shall be part of a multimodal analgesia concept and that patients have to be informed preoperatively about possible complications and alternative treatment options. Patients' history of pain and analgesic intake shall be evaluated. Patients at risk of severe postoperative pain and possible chronification of postsurgical pain shall be identified. Depending on the duration of surgery, nonopioid analgesics can already be administered preoperatively or intraoperatively so that plasma concentrations are sufficient after emergence from anesthesia. Nonopioid analgesics or combinations of analgesics shall be administered for a limited time only. An interdisciplinary written standard of care, comprising the nonopioid analgesic of choice, possible alternatives, adequate dosing and timing of administration as well as surgery-specific policies, have to be agreed upon by all departments involved. At discharge, the patient's physician shall be informed of analgesics given and those necessary after discharge. Patients shall be informed of possible side effects and symptoms and timely discontinuation of analgesic drugs.

CONCLUSION

The use of nonopioid analgesics as part of a perioperative multimodal concept should be approved and established as an interdisciplinary and interprofessional concept for the adequate treatment of postoperative pain.

[Perioperative analgesia with nonopioid analgesics : Joint interdisciplinary consensus-based recommendations of the German Pain Society, the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the German Society of Surgery]

Hintergrund

Nichtopioidanalgetika werden bei vielen Patienten zur perioperativen Analgesie eingesetzt. Zu einigen praktischen Fragen beim Einsatz von Nichtopioidanalgetika liegen z. T. nur wenig Informationen aus Studien vor, und in Krankenhäusern existieren häufig keine Konzepte zum Vorgehen, z. B. zur Patientenaufklärung und zum Zeitpunkt der perioperativen Gabe.

Methodik

Eine Expertengruppe der beteiligten Fachgesellschaften hat konsensbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Einsatz von Nichtopioidanalgetika erarbeitet und in einem strukturierten formalen Konsensusprozess verabschiedet.

Ergebnisse

Die Arbeitsgruppe stimmt überein, dass Nichtopioidanalgetika Bestandteil eines perioperativen multimodalen Analgesiekonzepts sein sollen und Patienten präoperativ über Nutzen, Risiken und alternative Behandlungsmöglichkeiten aufgeklärt werden sollen. Die präoperative Patienteninformation und -edukation soll auch eine Schmerz- und Analgetikaanamnese umfassen und Patienten mit Risikofaktoren für starke Schmerzen und eine Schmerzchronifizierung sollen identifiziert werden. Unter Berücksichtigung von Kontraindikationen können Nichtopioidanalgetika abhängig von der Operationsdauer auch schon prä- oder intraoperativ gegeben werden, um nach Beendigung der Anästhesie ausreichende Plasmakonzentrationen zu erzielen. Nichtopioidanalgetika oder Kombinationen von (Nichtopioid‑)Analgetika sollen nur für einen begrenzten Zeitraum gegeben werden. Ein gemeinsam erarbeiteter abteilungsübergreifender Behandlungsstandard mit dem Nichtopioidanalgetikum erster Wahl, weiteren Therapieoptionen sowie adäquaten Dosierungen, ergänzt durch eingriffsspezifische Konzepte, soll schriftlich hinterlegt werden. Bei Entlassung aus dem Krankenhaus soll der nachbehandelnde Arzt zu perioperativ gegebenen und aktuell noch eingenommenen Analgetika schriftliche Informationen erhalten. Patienten sollen zu möglichen Nebenwirkungen der Analgetika und ihrer Symptome, die auch nach Krankenhausentlassung auftreten können, und die befristete Einnahmedauer informiert werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Anwendung von Nichtopioidanalgetika soll als Bestandteil eines perioperativen multimodalen Analgesiekonzepts mit klaren Vorgaben zu Indikationen, Kontraindikationen, Dosierungen und Behandlungsdauer in einem abteilungsübergreifenden Behandlungsstandard schriftlich hinterlegt werden.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Offenlegung von Interessen ist in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00104-021-01421-w) enthalten.

Risikostratifizierung in der Rheumatologie: Analgetika-Therapie

Auch im Biologika-Zeitalter ist Schmerz ein häufiges Symptom bei Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen. NSAR sind dabei unverändert meist Mittel der ersten Wahl. Insbesondere aufgrund ihres gastrointestinalen, kardiovaskulären und renalen Nebenwirkungspotenzials erfordert ihr Einsatz eine individuelle Risikostratifizierung beim Patienten in Abhänggigkeit von der zugrundeliegenden Erkrankung, den Komorbiditäten und der Komedikation.

Bei NSAR-Versagen oder -Unverträglichkeit stehen nur wenige Nichtopioid-Analgetika als Alternative zur Verfügung. Paracetamol ist häufig nicht ausreichend effektiv und bedarf eines hepatischen Monitorings. Beim Einsatz von Metamizol ist bei meist guter Wirksamkeit und allgemein guter Verträglichkeit über die sehr seltene Möglichkeit einer Agranulozytose und deren Symptome aufzuklären. Sofern auch hiermit keine zufriedenstellende Schmerzkontrolle möglich ist, können Opioide zum Einsatz kommen. Die Risikostratifizierung erfordert hier ein leitliniengerechtes Abwägen des zu erwartenden Nutzens in Abhängigkeit von der Grunderkrankung einerseits und den Risiken andererseits, wobei v. a. psychische Effekte einschl. Missbrauchs- und Abhängigkeitspotenzial, Übelkeit, Obstipation und erhöhtes Sturzrisiko im Fokus stehen.

Für die nahe Zukunft sind keine wesentlichen Neuentwicklungen bei den Analgetika zu erwarten, sodass die individuelle Risikostratifizierung für die derzeit verfügbaren Präparate langfristig entscheidend für eine optimale Therapie des einzelnen Patienten bleiben wird.

[Adequacy of the safety of metamizole and agranulocytosis]

Objetivo

Analizar si la nota informativa de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), de 30 de octubre del 2018, sobre agranulocitosis y metamizol contiene la información precisa y necesaria para proteger a los pacientes de la aparición de esta reacción adversa (RA) y si la documentación oficial de los medicamentos con metamizol para médicos, farmacéuticos y población general está adaptada a las directrices de la AEMPS para disminuir el riesgo.

Emplazamiento y participantes

Nota informativa, búsqueda bibliográfica, información sobre los medicamentos con metamizol comercializados en España en la Agencia Europea del Medicamento, fichas técnicas, prospectos, base de datos de información sanitaria Bot PLUS y Catálogo de Especialidades Farmacéuticas. Notificación de 4 casos de agranulocitosis por metamizol posteriores a la fecha de la nota informativa.

Intervenciones y mediciones principales

Comparación de los puntos clave de la nota informativa y de los documentos oficiales sobre metamizol con la bibliografía. Descripción de 4 casos de agranulocitosis por metamizol y aplicación del algoritmo de causalidad y gravedad.

Resultados

La nota informativa presenta ausencias y dudas respecto a la bibliografía y al uso de metamizol en la práctica asistencial. Los documentos oficiales presentan faltas de actualización, indicaciones no aprobadas y dosis superiores a las recomendadas. La nota informativa no ha frenado la presentación de casos de agranulocitosis por metamizol.

Conclusiones

La nota informativa de la AEMPS es mejorable y es necesario actualizar los documentos oficiales de información sobre el metamizol para profesionales sanitarios y pacientes para disminuir el riesgo de agranulocitosis.

Preventive Analgesia, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pain in Vitreoretinal Surgery

Background and Objectives: Although vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is most commonly performed under regional anaesthesia (RA), in patients who might be unable to cooperate during prolonged procedures, general anaesthesia (GA) with intraprocedural use of opioid analgesics (OA) might be worth considering. It seems that the surgical pleth index (SPI) can be used to optimise the intraprocedural titration of OA, which improves haemodynamic stability. Preventive analgesia (PA) is combined with GA to minimise intraprocedural OA administration. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the benefit of PA combined with GA using SPI-guided fentanyl (FNT) administration on the incidences of PIPP (postprocedural intolerable pain perception) and haemodynamic instability in patients undergoing VRS (p < 0.05). We randomly assigned 176 patients undergoing VRS to receive GA with SPI-guided FNT administration alone (GA group) or with preventive topical 2% proparacaine (topical anaesthesia (TA) group), a preprocedural peribulbar block (PBB) using 0.5% bupivacaine with 2% lidocaine (PBB group), or a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of metamizole (M group) or 1.0 g of paracetamol (P group). Results: Preventive PBB reduced the intraprocedural FNT requirement without influencing periprocedural outcomes (p < 0.05). Intraprocedural SPI-guided FNT administration during GA resulted in PIPP in 13.5% of patients undergoing VRS and blunted the periprocedural effects of preventive intravenous and regional analgesia with respect to PIPP and haemodynamic instability. Conclusions: SPI-guided FNT administration during GA eliminated the benefits of preventive analgesia in the PBB, TA, M, and P groups following VRS.

Paediatric Agranulocytosis Associated with Metamizole Treatment

PURPOSE

Metamizole, which has antipyretic and pain-relieving properties, is generally used to treat fever in children who do not respond to paracetamol treatment. The most remarkable side effect of metamizole is that it causes myelotoxicity independently of dose. In this study, we aimed to present the clinical features of paediatric patients who developed agranulocytosis after the use of metamizole and draw attention to this side effect.

METHODS

The patients who were admitted to Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Pediatric Hematology Service, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, with a diagnosis of secondary agranulocytosis to metamizole use were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

In all, 12 patients were included in the study; oral metamizole was used in these patients for fever reduction. The mean absolute neutrophil count was 225/mm³ ± 226 (0-600/mm³) at admission, and the neutrophil value of 11 patients was < 500/mm³. The mean length of hospitalisation of the patients was 9.92 ± 8 (3-28) days. Eight patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy and four patients received at least one of the following treatments: intravenous immunoglobulin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and methylprednisolone. Bone marrow aspiration examination showed neutrophil/band maturation delaying in the myeloid series with normocellular bone marrow in three patients. Hypocellularity in the bone marrow and decrease in myeloid precursors were observed in three patients. There were no fatal cases.

CONCLUSION

The development of agranulocytosis after the use of metamizole causes long-term hospitalisation and may require the use of medications in treatment management. Considering the availability of alternative options to treat fever and pain, and given the side-effect profile of metamizole, it should not be the preferred, first-line antipyretic treatment in children.

Genome-Wide Association Study of Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis in European Populations

Agranulocytosis is a rare yet severe idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction to metamizole, an analgesic widely used in countries such as Switzerland and Germany. Notably, an underlying mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated and no predictive factors are known to identify at-risk patients. With the aim to identify genetic susceptibility variants to metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA) and neutropenia (MIN), we conducted a retrospective multi-center collaboration including cases and controls from three European populations. Association analyses were performed using genome-wide genotyping data from a Swiss cohort (45 cases, 191 controls) followed by replication in two independent European cohorts (41 cases, 273 controls) and a joint discovery meta-analysis. No genome-wide significant associations (p < 1 × 10⁻⁷) were observed in the Swiss cohort or in the joint meta-analysis, and no candidate genes suggesting an immune-mediated mechanism were identified. In the joint meta-analysis of MIA cases across all cohorts, two candidate loci on chromosome 9 were identified, rs55898176 (OR = 4.01, 95%CI: 2.41–6.68, p = 1.01 × 10⁻⁷) and rs4427239 (OR = 5.47, 95%CI: 2.81–10.65, p = 5.75 × 10⁻⁷), of which the latter is located in the SVEP1 gene previously implicated in hematopoiesis. This first genome-wide association study for MIA identified suggestive associations with biological plausibility that may be used as a stepping-stone for post-GWAS analyses to gain further insight into the mechanism underlying MIA.

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis.

METHODS

As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis.

CONCLUSION

The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

The PI3Kγ/AKT signaling pathway mediates peripheral antinociceptive action of dipyrone

Dipyrone (DIP), also known as metamizole, is an over-the-counter analgesic used in Europe and Latin America. Evidence suggesting that inflammatory pain attenuation by DIP is associated with a direct impact on peripheral primary nociceptive neurons through the stimulation of nitric oxide signaling pathway. However, the molecular mechanism by which DIP activates this pathway remains unknown. The PI3Kγ/AKT signaling cascade activation is one of the well-known molecular mechanisms that promote nitric oxide production in sensory neurons. Herein, we investigated the role of the PI3Kγ/AKT signaling cascade in the context of peripheral analgesic effect of DIP. DIP was administered into PGE2 pre-sensitized paws of rats and mechanical hyperalgesia was determined using electronic von Frey test after 1 h. Nonselective or selective pharmacological inhibitors of PI3Kγ and AKT were also administered in DIP-treated rats under paws sensitized with PGE2. Intraplantar injection of DIP attenuated PGE2-induced hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with nonselective (wortmannin or LY294002) or selective (AS605240) pharmacological inhibitors of PI3Kγ reduced the peripheral antihypernociceptive effect of DIP. Consistently, AKT selective inhibitor also reversed analgesic DIP effects. Corroborating these data, we found that DIP induced AKT phosphorylation in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons, which was prevented in the presence of PI3Kγ selective inhibitor. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that peripheral analgesic effect of DIP is dependent on the activation of PI3Kγ/AKT signaling pathway.

High-Throughput Sequencing to Investigate Associations Between HLA Genes and Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis

Background and Objective: Agranulocytosis is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of metamizole (dipyrone) intake that is characterized by a loss of circulating neutrophil granulocytes. While the mechanism underlying this adverse drug reaction is not well understood, involvement of the immune system has been suggested. In addition, associations between genetic variants in the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) region and agranulocytosis induced by other drugs have been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess whether genetic variants in classical HLA genes are associated with the susceptibility to metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA) in a European population by targeted resequencing of eight HLA genes.

Design: A case-control cohort of Swiss patients with a history of neutropenia or agranulocytosis associated with metamizole exposure (n = 53), metamizole-tolerant (n = 39) and unexposed controls (n = 161) was recruited for this study. A high-throughput resequencing (HTS) and high-resolution typing method was used to sequence and analyze eight HLA loci in a discovery subset of this cohort (n = 31 cases, n = 38 controls). Identified candidate alleles were investigated in the full Swiss cohort as well as in two independent cohorts from Germany and Spain using HLA imputation from genome-wide SNP array data. In addition, variant calling based on HTS data was performed in the discovery subset for the class I genes HLA-A, -B, and -C using the HLA-specific mapper hla-mapper.

Results: Eight candidate alleles (p < 0.05) were identified in the discovery subset, of which HLA-C^∗04:01 was associated with MIA in the full Swiss cohort (p < 0.01) restricted to agranulocytosis (ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L) cases. However, no candidate allele showed a consistent association in the Swiss, German and Spanish cohorts. Analysis of individual sequence variants in class I genes produced consistent results with HLA typing but did not reveal additional small nucleotide variants associated with MIA.

Conclusion: Our results do not support an HLA-restricted T cell-mediated immune mechanism for MIA. However, we established an efficient high-resolution (three-field) eight-locus HTS HLA resequencing method to interrogate the HLA region and demonstrated the feasibility of its application to pharmacogenetic studies.

[Agranulocytosis after use of metamizole - an underestimated risk?]

OBJECTIVE

Metamizole was the second most common drug prescribed in Germany in 2018 despite the known risk of agranulocytosis and the strict indication. According to Stammschulte et al. up to 25 % of all prescriptions are off-label use. Although mandatory according to the prescribing information of metamizole, regular blood cell counts are not performed in up to 50 % of the patients with long-term use of this drug.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of eight cases metamizole-induced agranulocytosis over a period of five years (2016-2020) in the university ENT department in Erlangen. Five patients were men and three women. Mean age of diagnosis was 52,4 years (± 25,6).

RESULTS

Agranulocytosis after use of metamizole is a serious adverse drug reaction that may affect patients of all ages. Frequently, only distinct clinical symptoms such as temperature of unknown origin, dysphagia and tonsillitis in combination with abscesses in the head and neck area result in the detection of a metamizole-induced agranulocytosis. An agranulocytosis provokes partially radical surgery and/ or intensive-care measures and could lead to sepsis with organ failure or even to death.

CONCLUSIONS

These patient cases show that agranulocytosis is a dangerous or even deadly adverse drug reaction after use of metamizole. Although the risk of agranulocytosis appears to increase with duration of use, we would recommend patient education as well as documentation of even a single administration of metamizole. This may facilitate early diagnosis of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis and thus prevent the onset of severe complications with possible lethal outcome.

Regional Differences in Prescribing Patterns of Metamizole in Germany Based on Data from 70 Million Persons

The non-opioid analgesic metamizole (dipyrone) is commonly used in Germany despite its narrow indications and market withdrawal from several countries. In this study we analyzed prescribing patterns of metamizole focusing on regional differences. The source of data was the “Information system for health care data” which includes data from the statutory health insurance funds for about 70 million Germans. We received aggregated data of individuals with at least one metamizole prescription in 2010 as well as the number of prescribed packages by age, sex, state and district along with the number of insured persons in each stratum. We calculated prescription prevalence stratified by age, sex, state and district. Among 68.4 million insured persons (mean age: 43.6 years; 53.0% female) 5.5 million received at least one metamizole prescription (8.1%, overall 12.2 million packages). Prevalence increased with age, and women received metamizole more often than men. In adults (total prevalence: 9.4%), levels varied between 7.0% (Saxony) and 11.1% (Schleswig-Holstein), whereas on a district level use ranged from 4.3% to 14.3%. In 2010, one of 12 individuals received metamizole at least once. Noticeable were the large regional variations which certainly cannot be explained by patient-related factors.

Development and validation of an LC–MS/MS method for the bioanalysis of the major metamizole metabolites in human plasma

Aim: Metamizole is a frequently used antipyretic and analgesic prodrug, yet its pharmacokinetics has not been thoroughly studied in infants and with coadministered medications. Thus, an LC–MS/MS method was developed to quantify the four major metamizole metabolites in human plasma. Methodology: Pre- and postcolumn infusion was installed to enable robust analyte retention and electrospray ionization following deproteinization of plasma samples. Results: The method was linear (R > 0.996), accurate (93.1–106.0%) and precise (≤12.7%). Mean recovery was more than 91.8% and ion suppression less than 13.1% for all analytes. Pharmacokinetic profiles were reproducible after 4 years at -80°C except for the formylated metabolite (-22.2%). Conclusion: The method fulfilled pertinent criteria of validation guidelines and required only little sample volume. The method therefore qualifies for metamizole analyses in children.

Metamizole and the risk of drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia in statutory health insurance data

The non-opioid analgesic metamizole (dipyrone) is used for the treatment of acute and chronic pain and fever. Agranulocytosis is known as a serious adverse drug reaction of metamizole with potentially fatal outcome. However, its frequency is controversially discussed. The aim of our study was to determine the risk of metamizole-associated agranulocytosis and neutropenia using statutory health insurance data. We analyzed data from a large German health insurance fund in the period from 2010 to 2013. Metamizole-exposed subjects were identified and compared to a propensity score-matched control cohort. A total of 630,285 metamizole-treated subjects and 390,830 matched control subjects were included. In the metamizole cohort, ICD codes for agranulocytosis and neutropenia appeared more often than in non-users. The relative risk for drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia (D70.1) was 3.03 (95% confidence interval, 2.49 to 3.69). The risk for developing drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia after metamizole prescription was 1: 1602 (CI 95%, 1:1926 to 1:1371). Our results confirm the risk estimation of previous studies. However, the outcome of our study may be confounded by an association of metamizole treatment and chemotherapy. Therefore, consequences for treatment have to be drawn with care.

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis.

METHODS

As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis.

CONCLUSION

The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

Agranulocytosis attributed to metamizole: An analysis of spontaneous reports in EudraVigilance 1985-2017

Despite ongoing debates about its safety, the use of metamizole (dipyrone) is still increasing in many countries. In this study, we analysed spontaneous reports of suspected metamizole-associated agranulocytosis recorded in EudraVigilance database from 1985 to 2017 with regard to patient and treatment characteristics as well as fatal vs non-fatal outcomes and compared these findings among countries. A total of 1448 reports from 31 different countries were included (Germany 42.0%; Spain 29.6%; Switzerland 13.1%; other countries 15.3%). Mean age of patients was 53.6 years (63.4% females). Differences among countries were observed, for example with respect to patient age, route of administration and daily doses. Overall, median time between starting metamizole and developing an agranulocytosis was 13 days with 34.7% of cases occurring up to 7 days. This time was much shorter in patients who had already received metamizole before (median: 6 vs 15 days). About 16% of cases ended fatally. Patients with fatal outcomes were older and more often had also received methotrexate compared to those with non-fatal outcomes. When adjusting for age and sex in a multivariable logistic regression, methotrexate was associated with an increased risk of fatal outcomes (odds ratio: 5.18; 95% confidence interval: 3.06-8.78). In conclusion, metamizole-associated agranulocytosis is still a life-threatening condition, especially in the elderly and those also receiving methotrexate. As agranulocytosis can develop weeks after last administration and independently of dose and duration of treatment, prescribers and patients should be aware of its signs and symptoms.

Metamizole-associated neutropenia: Comparison of patients with neutropenia and metamizole-tolerant patients

Reports of metamizole-induced neutropenia have increased in Switzerland and Germany over the last decades, most likely reflecting increased use of metamizole. To date, there are no effective strategies to identify patients at increased risk of metamizole-induced neutropenia. In this observational, multi-center comparative study, characteristics of patients with metamizole-associated neutropenia were compared with patients treated with metamizole without developing adverse hematological reactions. Patients with metamizole-induced neutropenia treated at the University Hospitals Basel and Bern between 2005 and 2017 were included. Tolerant comparison patients with continuous metamizole treatment (≥500 mg/day for at least 28 days) were recruited from GP offices and community pharmacies. Forty-eight patients with metamizole-induced neutropenia, consisting of 23 and 25 cases with inpatient-acquired and outpatient-acquired neutropenia, respectively, were compared to 39 metamizole tolerant comparison patients. Median latency until first diagnosis of neutropenia was 6 days (1-61 days) in inpatient cases and 19 days (2-204 days) in outpatient cases. There was no association between non-myelotoxic and non-immunosuppressive co-medication (p = .6627), history of drug allergy (p = .1304), and preexisting auto-immune diseases (p = .2313) and the development of metamizole-induced neutropenia. Our results suggest that autoimmune diseases, history of drug allergy, and concomitant treatment with non-myelotoxic and non-immunosuppressive drugs are likely not individual risk factors for metamizole-associated neutropenia.

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis.

METHODS

As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis.

CONCLUSION

The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

Dose evaluation of intravenous metamizole (dipyrone) in infants and children: a prospective population pharmacokinetic study

PURPOSE

The prodrug metamizole is prescribed intravenously for postoperative pain in children, including off-label use in infants < 1 year. We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of the main metabolites of metamizole in children aged 3-72 months.

METHODS

A single dose of 10 mg/kg metamizole was administered intravenously for postoperative analgesia. Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn at predefined time points. Pharmacokinetics of the main active metabolite 4-methylaminoantipyrine and three other metabolites was characterized by both non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic analysis. AUC_0-inf of 4-methylaminoantipyrine was calculated by non-compartmental analysis for two age cohorts (3-23 months, 2-6 years) and compared with the 80-125% range of adult dose-adjusted reference exposure (AUC_ref). Population pharmacokinetic analysis investigated age and weight dependency of the pharmacokinetics and optimal dosing strategies to achieve equivalent adult exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 25 children aged 5 months-5.8 years (7.8-24.8 kg) with at least one concentration sample were included; 19 children had ≥ 5 predefined samples up to 10 h after metamizole dose administration. AUC_0-inf of 4-methylaminoantipyrine in children 2-6 years was 29.9 mg/L/h (95% CI 23.4-38.2), significantly lower than AUC_ref (80-125% range 39.2-61.2 mg/L/h). AUC_0-inf of 4-methylaminoantipyrine in infants < 2 years was 43.6 mg/L/h (95% CI 15.8-119.0), comparable with AUC_ref, while infants < 12 months showed increased exposure. Observed variability could be partially explained by covariates weight and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics of 4-methylaminoantipyrine requires reduced weight-based IV dosing in infants < 1 year compared with infants and children up to 6 years (5 versus 10-20 mg/kg) to achieve equivalent adult exposure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02660177 .

[Acute pain therapy in orthopedics/trauma surgery]

The management of acute pain is of utmost importance in the treatment regimen of orthopedic and trauma patients. Pain perception is different for each patient and has to be individually addressed. Especially in a postoperative setting often with a very dynamic course of pain, it is optimal that the pain management is adapted to the individual course of pain. In this situation it makes sense to apply patient-controlled systems. By combining different analgesic substance classes and non-pharmaceutical therapy in the sense of a multimodal concept, the mechanisms of action complement each other and side effects can be reduced. Patient satisfaction is higher when they are actively involved in the (medicinal) pain therapy and in the decision making. This is particularly important for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In addition to invasive catheter administration procedures, there are also modern approaches for oral individual self-administered opioid treatment.

Drug use in the management of uncomplicated malaria in public health facilities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Background

Malaria the first causes of death from parasitic infection worldwide. Interventions to reduce the burden of malaria have produced a tremendous drop in malaria morbidity and mortality. However, progress is slower in DRC, which shares with Nigeria 39% of deaths related to malaria globally. Inappropriate use of drugs may be one of the factors of this below-average performance. The aim of this study was to describe the use of drugs in the management of uncomplicated malaria in public health facilities in DRC.

Methods

A drug use study was carried out in DRC from January to March 2014. In each of the former 11 provinces of DRC, one Rural Health Centre, one Urban Health Centre and one General Hospital were selected. In each of them, 100 patient’s files containing prescription of anti-malarials from January to December 2013 were randomly selected. Among them, all of the files with diagnosis of uncomplicated malaria were included in this study. Prescribed anti-malarials, co-prescribed drugs and their indications were collected. Descriptive analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 2300 files out of 3300 (69.7%) concerned uncomplicated malaria and were included in analysis. Malaria treatment was initiated after a positive RDT or microscopy in 51.5% of cases, upon suspicion without requesting biological confirmation in 37% and despite negative results in 11%. Twenty-nine (29) different treatment regimens were used. The drugs recommended by the National Malaria Control Programme were used in 54.3% of cases (artesunate–amodiaquine 37.4% or artemether–lumefantrine 16.9%). The second most used anti-malarial was quinine (32.4%). Apart from anti-malarials, an average of 3.1 drugs per patient were prescribed, among which antibiotics (67.9%), analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) (all abbreviations to be explicated on first use) (70.6%), vitamins (29.1%), anaemia drugs, including blood transfusion (9.1%) and corticosteroids (5.7%), In 51.4% of cases there was no indication for the concomitant medication.

Conclusion

Management of uncomplicated malaria in DRC is characterized by a low adherence to treatment policy, numerous treatment regimens, and abundant concomitant medication potentially harmful to the patient. This may contribute to the low performance of DRC in malaria control. Determinant of this irrational use of drugs need to be assessed in order to formulate and implement efficient corrective measures.

Dipyrone is the preferred nonopioid analgesic for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. A survey of clinical practice in German-speaking countries

PURPOSE

Nonopioid analgesics are frequently used for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. Dipyrone is an alternative to NSAIDs and paracetamol, however, data on the frequency of its usage by anaesthesiologists in the perioperative and chronic pain setting are lacking and its adverse reactions are a matter of debate.

METHODS

The link to a questionnaire on the use of nonopioid analgesics (NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol, dipyrone) and the safety of dipyrone in the perioperative and chronic pain setting was mailed to anaesthesiologists and pain physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 2237 responses were analysed. About 97.4% of the respondents used nonopioid analgesics for the treatment of acute pain, with 93.8% administering dipyrone, 54.0% NSAIDs, 41.8% COX-2 inhibitors and 49.2% paracetamol. Nonopioid analgesics were administered preoperatively by 22.3%, intraoperatively by 86.1% and postoperatively by 73.0% of the respondents. For chronic pain management, 76.7% of the respondents prescribed oral dipyrone in combination with other nonopioid analgesics; 19.9% used dipyrone as sole nonopioid, whereas 2.9% denied its use. Cases of dipyrone-associated agranulocytosis were observed by 3.5% of the respondents of the acute and 1.5% of the chronic pain questionnaire, respectively. The majority of respondents (acute pain: 73.0%, chronic pain 59.3%) performed no blood cell counts to monitor dipyrone therapy. Patients were rarely informed about possible adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipyrone is the preferred nonopioid analgesic in the perioperative and chronic pain setting. Although cases of agranulocytosis occur, benefits apparently outweigh the risks according to anaesthesiologists. Measures like patient information may improve safety.

SIGNIFICANCE

A survey of anaesthesiologist in German-speaking countries revealed dipyrone as preferred nonopioid analgesic for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. Benefits seem to outweigh the risks, specifically the risk of agranulocytosis. Information of medical staff and patients on adverse drug reactions and symptoms of agranulocytosis should be implemented.

[Dipyrone (metamizole) : Considerations on monitoring for early detection of agranulocytosis]

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone (metamizole) is a non-opioid analgesic commonly used in Germany, which can, in very rare cases, cause life-threatening agranulocytosis. The prescribing information calls for regular monitoring of the differential blood count in cases of long-term treatment. However, there is uncertainty about how this testing should be handled in practice.

OBJECTIVES

Which recommendations can be derived from the published literature for evaluating blood cell counts during treatment with metamizole and which other options for monitoring exist?

METHODS

Data from recent epidemiological studies, reviews, and spontaneously reported cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

Agranulocytosis can emerge at highly variable intervals ranging from the first day of metamizole treatment to months after treatment has begun. As a result, there is no conclusive, evidence-based recommendation for the time intervals at which blood cell counts should be tested. Therefore, the onset of clinical symptoms should be used as trigger for monitoring blood cell counts to enable early diagnosis and avoid agranulocytosis-related complications. In addition to general symptoms like fever, sore throat, fatigue, and muscle pain, mucosal ulcerations, severe angina, and systemic infections leading to sepsis are typical of agranulocytosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing patients and medical staff with better information about early symptoms of agranulocytosis could be a sensible way to prevent complications. Any suspicion of agranulocytosis should immediately lead to a differential blood count and to the withdrawal of all drugs possibly associated with agranulocytosis. Patients should be monitored and treated according to the severity of their symptoms.

Tramadol prescription patterns in patients followed by general practitioners and orthopedists in Germany in the year 2015

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze tramadol prescription patterns in acute pain patients followed by general practitioners and orthopedists in Germany.

METHODS

This study included patients ≥18 years diagnosed with acute pain who received at least one tramadol prescription each in one of 1,129 general or 179 orthopedic practices in Germany between January and December 2015 (index date). Patients were excluded if they had received a prescription for another analgesic in the year prior to the index date, had a follow-up of less than 15 months after the index date, or were prescribed tramadol for a period of more than three months. The main outcome of this retrospective study was the share of patients receiving tramadol in combination therapy. Combination therapy was defined as the prescription of tramadol in conjunction with at least one other analgesic during the same medical visit.

RESULTS

The present study included a total of 8,766 individuals. Overall, 1,492 (22.0%) of tramadol patients seen by general practitioners and 370 (18.7%) of those seen by orthopedists received tramadol in combination with other analgesics. Although this proportion was similar throughout the different subgroups in orthopedic practices, it was considerably higher in patients >80 years and in those with private health insurance coverage in general practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one of five tramadol patients was prescribed tramadol in combination therapy. Further research is needed to gain a better understanding of the demographic and clinical factors that have an effect on tramadol prescription patterns in Germany.

Prevalence of pain medication prescriptions in France, Germany, and the UK - a cross-sectional study including 4,270,142 patients

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the present study was to analyze the prevalence of pain medication prescriptions in general practices in France, Germany, and the UK.

METHODS

This study included all patients aged ≥18 years followed in 2016 in general practitioner practices in France, Germany and the UK. The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients receiving prescriptions for pain medications in France, Germany, and the UK in 2016. The following drugs were included in the analysis: anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids and analgesics including opioids, antimigraine preparations, and other analgesics and antipyretics. Demographic variables included age and gender.

RESULTS

This study included 4,270,142 patients. The prevalences of pain medication prescriptions were 57.3% in France, 29.6% in Germany, and 21.7% in the UK. Although this prevalence generally remained consistent between age groups in France (54.3%-60.3%), it increased with age in Germany (18-30 years: 23.8%; >70 years: 35.8%) and in the UK (18-30 years: 9.3%; >70 years: 43.8%). Finally, the prevalence of pain medication prescriptions was higher in women than in men in all three countries. Paracetamol was prescribed to 82.3% and 60.1% of patients receiving pain medication in France and the UK, respectively, whereas ibuprofen was prescribed to 46.5% of individuals in Germany.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pain medication prescriptions was higher in France than in Germany and the UK. Further research is needed to gain a better understanding of the differences in the prescription patterns between these three European countries.

Metamizole and Platelet Inhibition by Aspirin Following On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous metamizole on platelet inhibition by aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease early after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referal hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 43 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to postoperative intravenous metamizole ± opioids (study group; n = 23) or opioids alone (control group; n = 20). Aspirin was withheld at least 7 days before the surgery and reinitiated (300 mg) immediately after the procedure prior to metamizole use, and continued daily thereafter (150 mg). Platelet function was evaluated using multielectrode impedance aggregometry (acid-induced platelet activation [ASPI] and collagen-induced platelet activation [COL] test), P-selectin expression and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B₂ (11-DTXB₂) level at baseline, postoperative day (POD) 0, POD 1, POD 2, and POD 6. Residual platelet reactivity (RPR) was defined as ASPI test >400 AU*min.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In all study participants, postoperative ASPI test value moderately decreased (1058.2 v 966.6 AU*min, p = 0.047), urinary 11-DTXB₂ level increased (923.4 v 4367.3 pg/mg, p < 0.001), and P-selectin expression and COL test value remained stable postprocedure. The decreases of ASPI (p = 0.146) and COL test (p = 0.642), and P-selectin expression (p = 0.318) did not differ between both groups. Patients in the control group had higher postoperative increase of urinary 11-DTXB₂ level (p = 0.001). The prevalence of RPR was high and comparable between study and control groups (day 1, 95.6% v 100%, p = 0.535; day 6, 100% v 90%, p = 0.21). Multivariate analysis revealed that metamizole use did not predict the fluctuations of ASPI and COL test values and P-selectin expression, yet it independently predicted postoperative change of 11-DTXB₂ level (b = -0.518, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous metamizole preceded by a loading dose of aspirin did not modify platelet response to aspirin in the postoperative period after CABG.