The role of aminosalicylates at the beginning of the new millennium in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Bovine Colostrum and Its Potential for Human Health and Nutrition

Colostrum is the first milk produced post-partum by mammals and is compositionally distinct from mature milk. Bovine colostrum has a long history of consumption by humans, and there have been a number of studies investigating its potential for applications in human nutrition and health. Extensive characterization of the constituent fractions has identified a wealth of potentially bioactive molecules, their potential for shaping neonatal development, and the potential for their application beyond the neonatal period. Proteins, fats, glycans, minerals, and vitamins are abundant in colostrum, and advances in dairy processing technologies have enabled the advancement of bovine colostrum from relative limitations of a fresh and unprocessed food to a variety of potential applications. In these forms, clinical studies have examined bovine colostrum as having the substantial potential to improve human health. This review discusses the macro-and micronutrient composition of colostrum as well as describing well-characterized bioactives found in bovine colostrum and their potential for human health. Current gaps in knowledge are also identified and future directions are considered in order to elevate the potential for bovine colostrum as a component of a healthy diet for a variety of relevant human populations.

Usefulness of sulfasalazine for patients with refractory-ulcerative colits

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory-ulcerative colitis (UC) require therapy escalation. Sulfasalazine (SASP) could deliver a high concentration of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon. The usefulness of SASP for refractory-UC patients, however, is unclear.

AIM

The aim was to evaluate the usefulness of SASP for refractory-UC patients.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed 36 (11.4%) of 316 patients with refractory-UC who had been treated with SASP. Clinical and endoscopic activities were evaluated with Lichtiger index and Mayo score, respectively. We analysed the induction-remission rate, predictive factors for the efficacy of SASP, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 36 refractory-UC patients, 14 (38.9%) were treated with concomitant mesalazine enemas, 10 (27.8%) with azathiopurine, 4 (11.1%) with tacrolimus and 6 (16.7%) with an antitumour necrosis factor-α agent. After initiating SASP treatment, 25 patients (69.4%) achieved clinical remission. In 9 (64.3%) of 14 patients with UC treated with mesalazine enemas, mesalazine enemas could be discontinued with SASP. In all patients treated with tacrolimus, tacrolimus could be discontinued with SASP. Clinical activity score upon the initiation of SASP was significantly lower (p=0.024) and the number of patients treated with thiopurine was significantly higher (p=0.016) in the clinical remission group than in the non-clinical remission group. These factors might be predictive for the efficacy of SASP, although multivariate analysis demonstrated no statistically significant effect. Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (19.4%), and reduction or discontinuation of SASP led to improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

SASP appears to be more effective for refractory-UC patients with low clinical-activity and/or thiopurine-use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000021615; Results.

Size-dependent nanoparticulate drug delivery in inflammatory bowel diseases

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic autoimmune disease, whose main forms are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The main treatment of IBD includes oral administration of anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive agents enclosed in traditional dosage forms, intended to release the active ingredient in the large intestine. However, most of them have been designed based on the physiology of healthy colon, which differs distinctly from conditions met in IBD patients risking adverse effects and patient intolerance. The use of nanoparticles as a drug carrier for treatment of IBD is a promising approach that is capable of solving this problem. Previous studies have shown a size-dependent behavior, where reducing the particle size, increases the targeting efficacy and the residence time compared to healthy controls.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the utilization of nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for treating IBD. They can reach the inflamed colonic sites either by endothelial or epithelial delivery employing passive and active targeting strategies. The effect of particle size is analyzed in detail while elucidating other essential parameters such as the particle surface properties.

EXPERT OPINION

One of the most important advantages of nanoparticles is their passive targeting to the inflamed colonic tissues due to their size. Recent findings underline that this size-dependent bioadhesion behavior can be further enhanced by selecting smart surface properties to help in penetrating the mucus and reach the inflamed sites.

The anti-inflammatory activity of a novel fused-cyclopentenone phosphonate and its potential in the local treatment of experimental colitis

A novel fused-cyclopentenone phosphonate compound, namely, diethyl 3-nonyl-5-oxo-3,5,6,6a-tetrahydro-1H-cyclopenta[c]furan-4-ylphosphonate (P-5), was prepared and tested in vitro (LPS-activated macrophages) for its cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activity and in vivo (DNBS induced rat model) for its potential to ameliorate induced colitis. Specifically, the competence of P-5 to reduce TNFα, IL-6, INFγ, MCP-1, IL-1α, MIP-1α, and RANTES in LPS-activated macrophages was measured. Experimental colitis was quantified in the rat model, macroscopically and by measuring the activity of tissue MPO and iNOS and levels of TNFα and IL-1β. It was found that P-5 decreased the levels of TNFα and the tested proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in LPS-activated macrophages. In the colitis-induced rat model, P-5 was effective locally in reducing mucosal inflammation. This activity was equal to the activity of local treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid. It is speculated that P-5 may be used for the local treatment of IBD (e.g., with the aid of colon-specific drug platforms). Its mode of action involves inhibition of the phosphorylation of MAPK ERK but not of p38 and had no effect on IκBα.

The efficacy of the combination therapy with oral and topical mesalazine for patients with the first episode of radiation proctitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Radiation proctitis is a common complication of pelvic radiation for which an optimal treatment remains undetermined. We assessed the efficacy of oral and topical mesalazine combination therapy for patients with naive radiation proctitis.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with radiation proctitis were enrolled in the study over a period of 2 years. Three of these patients were excluded due to severe bleeding during the study. Twenty patients (mean age 60.3 years; two males, 18 females) were treated with oral mesalazine (3 × 1 g per day) plus a daily mesalazine suppository (1 g per day at bedtime) for 4 weeks. The efficacy of treatment was assessed according to the Subjective Objective Management Analytic (SOMA) scale for alleviation of clinical symptoms of rectal toxicity and sigmoidoscopic findings.

RESULTS

The mean bleeding score improved significantly from 2.10 to 1.70 (p = 0.002) with mesalazine treatment. However, scores were not improved for pain (0.30-0.20, p = 0.163), tenesmus (0.50-0.45, p = 0.577), or stool frequency (0.35-0.30, p = 0.577). The improvements in the mean telangiectasia score (1.80-1.45, p = 0.005), bleeding point score (1.60-1.05, p < 0.001), and friable mucosa score (1.35-1.00, p = 0.005) were all statistically significant. No side-effects were noted in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral and topical mesalazine therapy for radiation proctitis may be a safe and effective treatment for naive radiation proctitis, especially for hemorrhagic proctitis. A large, randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the results of this pilot study.

A clinical trial on absorption and N-acetylation of oral and rectal mesalazine

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-ASA) is a standard treatment for ulcerative colitis. Extent of absorption and N-acetylation determine systemic exposure to 5-ASA, and are thereby relevant for the safety of the treatment. The aim of the study was to compare absorption and N-acetylation of 5-ASA following rectal or oral drug administration. Healthy subjects were compared to patients with ulcerative colitis to evaluate the impact of chronic inflammation of colorectal mucosa on disposition of 5-ASA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, 12 healthy adults were randomized to receive 2 g of 5-ASA by each of four different formulations: oral delayed release granules, 30 mL enema, 60 mL rectal foam, and 120 mL rectal foam. Second, 12 patients with active ulcerative colitis received 60 mL rectal foam. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by determination of 5-ASA and its acetylated, pharmacologically inactive metabolite (Ac-5-ASA) in plasma and urine.

RESULTS

First, systemic exposure to 5-ASA was markedly lower after rectal drug administration as compared to oral dosing (P < 0.001; e.g. median relative bioavailability of 60 mL rectal foam: 36%). Second, N-acetylation of rectal 5-ASA was lower in patients than in healthy subjects [area under the curve (AUC) ratio Ac-5-ASA/5-ASA: 1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.4, mean +/- SD, P < 0.01]. High peak plasma concentrations of 5-ASA were correlated with high microscopic disease activity (r = 0.67, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal delivery of 5-ASA results in low systemic drug exposure with potentially reduced toxicity in comparison with oral drug administration. Chronic inflammation of colorectal mucosa might be a relevant source of variability in pharmacokinetics of 5-ASA.

Drugs, their targets and the nature and number of drug targets

What is a drug target? And how many such targets are there? Here, we consider the nature of drug targets, and by classifying known drug substances on the basis of the discussed principles we provide an estimation of the total number of current drug targets.

Medical management of left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: critical evaluation of therapeutic trials

BACKGROUND

The goal of this work was to critically evaluate the published studies on the treatment of ulcerative proctitis (UP) and left-sided ulcerative colitis (L-UC). The results of this review provided the content for the accompanying treatment guidelines, Clinical Guidelines for the Medical Management of Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Proctitis: Summary Statement.

METHODS

All English language articles published between 1995 and September 2005 were identified through a comprehensive literature search using OVID and PubMed. The quality of the data supporting or rejecting the use of specific therapies was categorized by a data quality grading scale. An "A+" grade was assigned to treatment supported by multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials with consistent results, whereas a "D" grade was given to therapy supported only by expert opinion. The therapeutic efficacy of a treatment was defined by its success in treating UP and L-UC compared with placebo. A medication was ranked as "excellent" if it was specifically studied for UP and L-UC and had consistently positive results compared with placebo or another agent. Quality and efficacy scores were agreed on by author consensus.

RESULTS

For the acute treatment of UP or L-UC, the rectally administered corticosteroids and mesalazine (5-ASA), either alone or in combination with oral 5-ASAs, are the most effective therapy: evidence quality, A+; efficacy, excellent. Only rectally administered 5-ASA received an A+/excellent rating for maintenance of remission. Infliximab received an A+ grade for induction and maintenance of remission but only a "good" rating because the studies were performed in all UC, not specifically UP or L-UC.

CONCLUSIONS

This critical evaluation of treatment provides a "report card" on medications available for the management of patients with UP and L-UC. The guidelines should provide a useful reference and supplement for physicians treating UC patients.

Transport studies with 5-aminosalicylate

OBJECTIVE

It is generally accepted that 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA; mesalamine), widely used in inflammatory bowel disease therapy, exerts its action from the intraluminal site of the intestine. In addition to local metabolism of 5-ASA, it has been assumed that therapeutic mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA depend on transporter-mediated secretion back to the lumen.

METHODS

We tested the hypothesis that 5-ASA represents a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and/or multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2), thereby possibly contributing to variable therapeutic effects. Polarized, basal-to-apical transport of [(3)H]5-ASA was studied in monolayers of Caco-2 and L-MDR cells, both of which express P-gp in their apical membrane, as well as in MDCK cells transfected with human MRP2. Moreover, we investigated the influence of 5-ASA on transport of digoxin in Caco-2 cells.

RESULTS

In Caco-2 cells a P-gp-mediated efflux of 5-ASA (5-500 muM) could be excluded. Likewise, in L-MDR1 and MRP2 cells no transport differences in either the basal-to-apical or apical-to-basal direction were measurable. 5-ASA (50 muM to 5 mM) had no effect on the transport of digoxin.

CONCLUSION

From these in-vitro experiments one can conclude that intestinal secretion of 5-ASA is apparently not mediated by P-gp or MRP2. Further studies are needed to identify the nature of the involved active carrier system(s).

5-aminosalicylic acid release from a new controlled-release mesalazine formulation during gastrointestinal transit in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) containing formulations represent a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. A novel formulation with an Eudragit L/S mixture coating has been developed to provide selective release of 5-ASA to the ileo-caecal region and the colon.

AIM

To determine the release of 5-ASA during the gastrointestinal transit.

METHODS

A single oral dose of mesalazine EC 500 mg gastroresistant tablets (Asamax) was administered to eight healthy male volunteers. Gastrointestinal transit and tablet disintegration were monitored by scintigraphy. 5-ASA release was verified by assessing plasma pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Initial tablet disintegration was observed 5.65 +/- 0.86 h after dosing, corresponding to the detection of 5-ASA in plasma. This occurred in the ileo-caecal region in three subjects and the ascending colon in the remaining five. The relative percentage of 5-ASA absorption was more pronounced in the ascending colon (41 +/- 27.4%) than the ileo-caecal region (6.6 +/- 9.2%).

CONCLUSION

This mesalazine EC gastroresistant tablets release locally active 5-ASA specifically in the ileo-caecal region and the ascending colon.

Trial of trefoil factor 3 enemas, in combination with oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, for the treatment of mild-to-moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Current treatment of ulcerative colitis is imperfect. Trefoil peptides are known to stimulate repair in many models of injury, including animal models of colitis.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of trefoil factor family-3 enema treatment in a clinical trial.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with mild-to-moderate left sided ulcerative colitis were recruited into a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. Patients taking steroids or with proctitis only were excluded. Patients received 75 mL enemas containing either human recombinant trefoil factor family-3 (10 mg/mL) or saline alone once a day for 14 days. All patients also received an oral dose-increment of 1.2 g of mesalazine daily above their normal usage. Patients were assessed at 0, 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Remission was defined as Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index of 0 or 1 with no blood in stool. Individual clinical improvement was defined as a Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index reduction of >3. Data was analysed using chi-square test and anova.

RESULTS

Median Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index at entry were 8.5 (trefoil factor family-3 group) and 8 (placebo group). Analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, only one patient went into remission (in trefoil factor family-3 group at day 28). Clinical improvement was seen in two trefoil factor family-3 and three placebo patients on day 14 and two patients in each group on day 28.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid was moderately effective in reducing the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index but was insufficient to induce remission. Trefoil factor family-3 enemas were well-tolerated but did not provide additional benefit above that of adding additional 5-aminosalicylic acid alone.

Colonic targeting of aminosalicylates for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Aminosalicylates (5-aminosalicylic acid) represent drugs of first choice in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Two different therapeutic approaches have been employed to target the active 5-aminosalicylic acid to its site of action. Either inactive azo-prodrugs (e.g. sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) or special galenic formulations have been developed for topical delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon. However, as intestinal physiology, the extent of ulcerative colitis as well as drug disposition demonstrate large interindividual differences, acute healing rates (40-80%) and the maintenance of remission are quite variable. Apparently, therapeutic effects depend on local concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the colonic mucosa whereas systemic drug exposure might be one determinant of side effects. In general, 5-aminosalicylic acid is well tolerated and withdrawal from therapy is rare. Following administration of azo-prodrugs (e.g. olsalazine), lower plasma concentrations and higher delivery into the colon of 5-aminosalicylic acid can be observed in comparison to special galenic formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid. Whether such changes in drug disposition will affect therapeutic efficacy remains to be proved by clinical data. Consequently, selection of a particular agent should be based primarily on clinical efficacy, profile of adverse effects, patients' acceptance and economic considerations.

Novel drug delivery strategies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses two idiopathic inflammatory diseases of the intestinal tract: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Existing therapy for IBD consists mainly of orally or rectally administered small drug molecules, such as 5-aminosalicylates and corticosteroids, or potent systemic immune suppressants. IBD presents a challenging target for drug delivery, particularly by the oral route, as, contrary to most therapeutic regimens, minimal systemic absorption and maximal intestinal wall drug levels are desired. Several delivery strategies are employed to achieve this goal, including the chemical modification of the drug molecules, the use of controlled- and delayed-release formulations and the use of bioadhesive particles. The goal of this review is to summarise existing IBD therapy and examine novel approaches in intestinal drug delivery.

5-aminosalicylic acid is an attractive candidate agent for chemoprevention of colon cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is classically subdivided into ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Patients with IBD have increased risk for colorectal cancer. Because the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma has not been entirely defined yet and there is no ideal treatment for colon cancer, cancer prevention has become increasingly important in patients with IBD. The two adopted methods to prevent the development of colon cancer in clinical practice include the prophylactic colectomy and colonoscopic surveillance. But patients and physicians seldom accept colectomy as a routine preventive method and most patients do not undergo appropriate colonoscopic surveillance. Chemoprevention refers to the use of natural or synthetic chemical agents to reverse, suppress, or to delay the process of carcinogenesis. Chemoprevention is a particularly useful method in the management of patients at high risk for the development of specific cancers based on inborn genetic susceptibility, the presence of cancer-associated disease, or other known risk factors. Prevention of colorectal cancer by administration of chemopreventive agents is one of the most promising options for IBD patients who are at increased risks of the disease. The chemopreventive efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against intestinal tumors has been well established. But with reports that NSAIDs aggravated the symptoms of colitis, their sustained use for the purpose of cancer chemoprevention has been relatively contraindicated in IBD patients. Another hopeful candidate chemoprevention drug for IBD patients is 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), which is well tolerated by most patients and has limited systemic adverse effects, and no gastrointestinal toxicity. 5-ASA lacks the well-known side effects of long-term NSAIDs use. Retrospective correlative studies have suggested that the long-term use of 5-ASA in IBD patients may significantly reduce the risk of development of colorectal cancer. According to the literature, this agent might well satisfy clinical expectations with respect to a safe and effective chemopreventive agent.

Topical delivery of therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

For targeting local and systemic inflammatory processes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutic agents of first choice (e.g. aminosalicylates, corticosteroids) have been developed in special galenic forms to accomplish the topical delivery of the active compounds to the terminal ileum (Crohn's disease) and/or the colon (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). However, it has to be realized that intestinal physiology (e.g. motility, intraluminal pH profiles), extent and pattern of IBD as well as drug disposition demonstrate large interindividual differences resulting in variable clinical response rates between about 35% and 75%. 5-Aminosalicylate (5-AS) can be delivered to the colon either by azo-prodrugs (e.g. sulfasalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide) or by direct rectal administration of 5-AS in form of enemas, foam or suppositories. Such formulations will be only effective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Various slow/controlled release preparations of 5-AS have been developed for oral use. Some of them (e.g. Pentasa, Salofalk) release sufficient 5-AS already in the small bowel which could provide some additional benefit in Crohn's disease (CD). As urinary and faecal recoveries of total 5-AS are similar for all oral formulations, no major clinical differences can be expected. Extent of the disease, profile of adverse effects and patient's acceptance provide some guidance for selection of the particular agent. Rectal installation of several glucocorticosteroids has been employed for many years. More recently scientific and clinical interest has been focused on budesonide which is extensively presystemically metabolized in the intestinal wall and the liver. Therefore, its systemic availability is low (10-15%) independent whether budesonide is administered orally as controlled release formulation in patients with CD or rectally as enema in patients with UC. Numerous pharmacokinetic and clinical studies have documented the anticipated topical delivery and clinical efficacy of this corticosteroid without serious side effects such as cushingoid features. It can be assumed that for any novel therapeutic principle in IBD the approach of topical delivery will be also tried.

Colonic drug delivery

Fifteen years of research in the area of colon-specific drug delivery has left us with a slim choice of viable techniques, not because of the lack of proofs of concept but because of the ambiguity regarding the therapeutic necessity of targeting the colon with drugs. Critical analysis of existing technologies as well as medically based novel ideas could lead to interesting prospects.:

Pharmacokinetics of mesalazine pellets in children with inflammatory bowel disease

Mesalazine is a first-line drug in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and is customarily used to induce and maintain remission in mild to moderate disease. In children, pharmacokinetic data are scarce, and dosage recommendations are largely extrapolated from studies in adults. Aim of the study was to obtain the pharmacokinetic profile of a new mesalazine pellet formulation in children with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. A single oral dose of 20 mg/kg mesalazine was administered to 13 patients (age 6-16 years). Serial blood and urine sampling for determination of mesalazine and acetylmesalazine was performed before and during 24 hours following ingestion. Maximum plasma concentration of mesalazine (Cmax) was 1332 ng/mL (geometric mean, geometric coefficient of variation [CV]: 0.57), obtained 3.7 hours (tmax; CV: 0.31) after drug administration. Systemic exposure as determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) ) was 8712 ng/ml*h (CV: 0.44). Terminal half-life of elimination of mesalazine was 3.5 hours (t(1/2); CV: 1.43). This study presents extensive pharmacokinetic data on mesalazine in children with mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. In comparison with previous experience in adults, pharmacokinetics of mesalazine administered as pellets appear to be similar in both populations.

Epidermal growth factor enemas with oral mesalamine for mild-to-moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis or proctitis

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a potent mitogenic peptide produced by salivary glands. We examined whether EGF enemas are an effective treatment for active left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulceration limited to the rectum (proctitis).

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted at Leicester Royal Infirmary, 12 patients with mild-to-moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis received daily enemas of 5 microg of EGF in 100 ml of an inert carrier and 12 received daily enemas with carrier alone for 14 days. All also began to receive 1.2 g of oral mesalamine per day or had their dose increased by 1.2 g per day. Patients were assessed clinically at 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks and by sigmoidoscopy and biopsy at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. The primary end point was disease remission (defined by a St. Marks score of 4 or less without sigmoidoscopic evidence of inflammation) at two weeks. Secondary end points were clinically significant improvements in disease activity (defined by a decrease of more than 3 points in the St. Marks score or the ulcerative colitis disease-activity index) at two and four weeks. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

After two weeks, 10 of the 12 patients given EGF enemas were in remission, as compared with 1 of 12 in the control group (83 percent vs. 8 percent, P<0.001). At the 2-week assessment, disease-activity scores, sigmoidoscopic score, and histologic scores were all significantly better in the EGF group than in the placebo group (P<0.01 for all comparisons), and this benefit was maintained at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary data suggesting that EGF enemas are an effective treatment for active left-sided ulcerative colitis.

Gastrointestinal transit and release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from 153Sm-labelled mesalazine pellets vs. tablets in male healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid)-containing formulations, designed to optimize drug delivery to the ileo-caecal region, represent a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

AIM

: To test, by means of pharmaco-scintigraphy, whether novel mesalazine-containing pellets release 5-aminosalicylic acid in the same target region as mesalazine tablets (Salofalk).

METHODS

Fourteen healthy male volunteers received a single dose of either pellets or tablets containing 500 mg of mesalazine and 2 mg of 152Sm2O3 with a 1-week washout period. The gastrointestinal transit of 153Sm, incorporated into the formulations, was followed by gamma-scintigraphy. Mesalazine release was verified by assessing 5-aminosalicylic acid plasma pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

The formulations reached the ileo-caecal target region almost at the same time (3.3 +/- 1 and 3.8 +/- 1 h for pellets and tablets, respectively). Plasma 5-aminosalicylic acid tmax values were comparable and corresponded to the time during which the formulations were located in the target region. Plasma AUC values were significantly lower for pellets, which might be explained by a more prolonged release of 5-aminosalicylic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel mesalazine pellets and Salofalk tablets release active 5-aminosalicylic acid in the same target region and pass through the gastrointestinal tract under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers in a comparable time. From a comparison of in vitro dissolution and plasma concentration data, a slower and more prolonged release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from pellets is suggested.

Gastrointestinal transit and 5-ASA release from a new mesalazine extended-release formulation

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA)-containing formulations represent a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Recently, a new formulation has been developed to provide selective and more homogeneous release of 5-ASA compared to traditional systems.

METHODS

In a first study, gastrointestinal transit was followed by gamma-scintigraphy after single-dose application of tablets containing 1200 mg mesalazine to 12 healthy male volunteers. 5-ASA release was verified by the assessment of plasma pharmacokinetics. In a second, 7-day, multiple-dose study, the steady state plasma pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion and safety profile were characterized after twice-daily tablet administration to 12 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Tablet erosion started after 6.9 +/- 1.1 h in the ascending or transverse colon. Radioactivity spread homogeneously throughout the colon, indicating the sustained release of active 5-ASA. Plasma kinetics indicated an earlier initial absorption of 5-ASA, i.e. during transit of the small intestine and ileum. Mean Cmax values (350.6 +/- 322.6 ng/mL) were observed during location in the ileo-caecal region. The mean relative absorption of 5-ASA was 19.9 +/- 18.2% in the small intestine and ileum and 80.1 +/- 18.2% in the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of the new mesalazine formulation was well tolerated, and 5-ASA was continuously released along the whole colon, a favourable prerequisite for the therapy of distally located inflammatory bowel disease.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood: best available evidence

The physician treating children with inflammatory bowel disease is confronted with a number of specific problems, one of them being the lack of randomized, controlled drug trials in children. In this review, the role of nutritional therapy is discussed with a focus on primary treatment, especially for children with Crohn's disease. Then, the available medical therapies are highlighted, reviewing the evidence of effectiveness and side effects in children, as compared with what is known in adults. Nutritional therapy has proven to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in Crohn's disease while promoting linear growth. Conventional treatment consists of aminosalicylates and corticosteroids, whereas the early introduction of immunosuppressives (such as azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine) is advocated as maintenance treatment. If these drugs are not tolerated or are ineffective, methotrexate may serve as an alternative in Crohn's disease. Cyclosporine is an effective rescue therapy in severe ulcerative colitis, but only will postpone surgery. A novel strategy to treat Crohn's disease is offered by infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Based on the best-available evidence, suggested usage is provided for separate drugs with respect to dosage and monitoring of side effects in children.

Use of the 'nutriceutical', bovine colostrum, for the treatment of distal colitis: results from an initial study

BACKGROUND

Bovine colostrum is a rich source of nutrients, antibodies and growth factors.

AIM

To examine the efficacy of colostrum enemas in the treatment of distal colitis using a randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol.

METHODS

Fourteen patients (eight female), with a mean age of 45 years (range, 16-75 years) and mild to moderately severe distal colitis (Powell-Tuck scoring system), received colostrum enema (100 mL of 10% solution) or placebo (albumin solution) b.d. for 4 weeks. Both groups also received mesalazine (1.6 g/day) or, if already taking it, had a dose increment of 1.6 g/day. Disease activity was documented at 0, 2 and 4 weeks.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, the colostrum group showed a mean reduction in symptom score of - 2.9 (95% confidence interval (CI), - 5.4 to - 0.3), whereas the placebo group showed a mean response of + 0.5 (95% CI, - 2.4 to +3.4). The histological score improved in five of the eight patients in the colostrum group (mean response, - 0.9; 95% CI, - 1.69 to - 0.03), whereas the histological scores only improved in two of the six patients in the placebo group (mean response, 0.2; 95% CI, - 2.4 to +2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Bovine colostrum enema shows potential as a novel therapy for left-sided colitis with additional benefits over using mesalazine alone. Further studies appear to be warranted.

Balsalazide: a review of its therapeutic use in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

The aminosalicylate balsalazide is a prodrug which is metabolised by bacterial azo reductases in the colon to release its therapeutically active moiety mesalazine [mesalamine (US) or 5-aminosalicylic acid] and an inert carrier molecule. The systemic absorption of balsalazide and its metabolites is not required for the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, and has been demonstrated to be limited. Data from well designed trials with a duration of 8 to 12 weeks show that oral balsalazide 6.75 g/day is as effective as (two trials) or more effective than (one trial) oral delayed-release (pH-dependent) mesalazine 2.4 g/day and appears to be as effective as oral sulfasalazine 3 g/day in the treatment of active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In addition, balsalazide appears to have a faster onset of action than mesalazine. Furthermore, balsalazide was as effective as delayed-release mesalazine (dosages used were 1.2 and 1.5 g/day, where 1.6 g/day is recommended) and oral sulfasalazine 2 g/day (recommended dosage) in the prevention of relapse in ulcerative colitis in remission after 6 to 12 months of treatment; the balsalazide dosage was 3 g/day versus mesalazine and 2 g/day versus sulfasalazine. Although not well established, additional benefits may be achieved with balsalazide dosages up to 6 g/day. Data from well designed, 2- to 12-month trials show that balsalazide is well tolerated by patients with ulcerative colitis in both acute and maintenance indications, and is better tolerated than standard formulations of sulfasalazine at therapeutically relevant dosages.

CONCLUSION

Balsalazide is a well tolerated and effective first-line therapeutic option for patients with ulcerative colitis, both for the treatment of active mild-to-moderate disease and as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse.

Medical therapy for ulcerative colitis

Although newer therapeutic agents are being developed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, aminosalicylates and corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for UC (Tables 2-5). Patients who do not respond to these agents or become steroid dependent require immunomodulatory therapy or curative surgery. Cyclosporine represents the greatest treatment advance for UC in 10 years. The role of nicotine, heparin, antibiotics, probiotics, and SCFA in the treatment of UC is less clear, but these agents may offer an alternative therapeutic approach for patients intolerant or nonresponsive to standard therapy.