Quinidine inhibits the 7-hydroxylation of chlorpromazine in extensive metabolisers of debrisoquine

In Vitro ADME and Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of Ulotaront, a TAAR1/5-HT1A Receptor Agonist for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Purpose

Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a TAAR1 agonist with 5-HT_1A agonist activity currently in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. The objectives of the current study were to characterize the in vitro ADME properties, preclinical PK, and to evaluate the DDI potential of ulotaront and its major metabolite SEP-383103.

Methods

Solubility, permeability, plasma protein binding, CYP inhibition and induction, transporter inhibition and uptake studies were conducted in vitro. Phenotyping studies were conducted using recombinant human CYPs and FMOs, human liver microsomes and human liver homogenates. Preclinical plasma and brain pharmacokinetics were determined after a single intraperitoneal, intravenous, and oral administration of ulotaront.

Results

Ulotaront is a compound of high solubility, high permeability, and low binding to plasma proteins. Ulotaront metabolism is mediated via both NADPH-dependent and NADPH-independent pathways, with CYP2D6 as the major metabolizing enzyme. Ulotaront is an inducer of CYP2B6, and an inhibitor of CYP2D6, OCT1 and OCT2, while SEP-383103 is neither a CYP inducer nor a potent inhibitor of CYPs and human transporters. Ulotaront exhibits rapid absorption, greater than 70% bioavailability, approximately 3.5 L/kg volume of distribution, 1.5-4 h half-life, 12-43 ml/min/kg clearance, and good penetration across the blood–brain barrier in preclinical species.

Conclusions

Ulotaront has been designated as a BCS1 compound by US FDA. The ability of ulotaront to penetrate the blood–brain barrier for CNS targeting has been demonstrated in mice and rats. The potential for ulotaront and SEP-383103 to act as perpetrators of CYP and transporter-mediated DDIs is predicted to be remote.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11095-022-03267-1.

How Can Drug Metabolism and Transporter Genetics Inform Psychotropic Prescribing?

Many genetic variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been shown to be relevant for treating psychiatric disorders. Associations are strong enough to feature on drug labels and for prescribing guidelines based on such data. A range of commercial tests are available; however, there is variability in included genetic variants, methodology, and interpretation. We herein provide relevant background for understanding clinical associations with specific variants, other factors that are relevant to consider when interpreting such data (such as age, gender, drug-drug interactions), and summarize the data relevant to clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and the available prescribing guidelines. We also highlight areas for future research focus in this field.

Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Chlorpromazine

The discovery of chlorpromazine in the early 1950s revolutionized the clinical treatment of schizophrenia, galvanized the development of psychopharmacology, and standardized protocols used for testing the clinical efficacy of antipsychotics. Furthermore, chlorpromazine expanded our understanding of the role of chemical messaging in neurotransmission and reduced the stigma associated with mental illness, facilitating deinstitutionalization in the 1960s and 1970s. In this review, we will discuss the synthesis, manufacturing, metabolism and pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, structure-activity relationship, and adverse effects of chlorpromazine. In conclusion, we summarize the history and significant contributions of chlorpromazine that have resulted in this potent first-generation antipsychotic maintaining its clinical relevance for nearly 70 years.

P450 Pharmacogenetics in Indigenous North American Populations

Indigenous North American populations, including American Indian and Alaska Native peoples in the United States, the First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples in Canada and Amerindians in Mexico, are historically under-represented in biomedical research, including genomic research on drug disposition and response. Without adequate representation in pharmacogenetic studies establishing genotype-phenotype relationships, Indigenous populations may not benefit fully from new innovations in precision medicine testing to tailor and improve the safety and efficacy of drug treatment, resulting in health care disparities. The purpose of this review is to summarize and evaluate what is currently known about cytochrome P450 genetic variation in Indigenous populations in North America and to highlight the importance of including these groups in future pharmacogenetic studies for implementation of personalized drug therapy.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Amodiaquine, its desethylated metabolite, or both, inhibit the metabolism of debrisoquine (CYP2D6) and losartan (CYP2C9) in vivo

OBJECTIVE

To study the extent of in vivo inhibition by the antimalarial drug amodiaquine, its active metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine, or both, of the metabolism of four probe drugs of the enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP1A2.

METHODS

Twelve healthy Swedish volunteers received a cocktail of four probe drugs (debrisoquine, omeprazole, losartan and caffeine) to determine their baseline metabolic capacities. After a washout period, they received a 600 mg oral dose of amodiaquine hydrochloride; and 2-3 h later the cocktail was administered again. One week after the intake of amodiaquine, the subjects received the cocktail a third time. The levels of probe drugs and their metabolites as well as amodiaquine and its metabolite were determined by HPLC.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of amodiaquine and N-desethylamodiaquine could be followed in all subjects for 6 h and 28 days, respectively. Among the 12 subjects, a 3-fold variation in amodiaquine AUC and a 2-fold variation in N-desethylamodiaquine AUC, were observed. The CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 activities of the subjects were measured by debrisoquine and losartan phenotyping tests, respectively. There were significant mean increases in debrisoquine metabolic ratio (MR) between baseline and the second cocktail [MR(2 h)-MR(baseline) 1.426 (95% confidence interval 1.159, 1.755), P=0.002; ANOVA, Fisher LSD test] and in mean losartan MR between baseline and the second cocktail [MR(2 h)-MR(baseline) 1.724 (95% confidence interval 1.076, 2.762), P=0.026; ANOVA, Fisher LSD test]. The effects on CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 activities subsided within a week after intake of amodiaquine as tested by the phenotyping cocktail. The changes in omeprazole MRs and caffeine MRs were not statistically significant between any of the study phases.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of amodiaquine decreased CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 activities significantly compared to baseline values. Amodiaquine has the potential to cause drug-drug interactions and should be further investigated in malarial patients treated with drug combinations containing amodiaquine.

Drug disposition of chiral and achiral drug substrates metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 isozyme: case studies, analytical perspectives and developmental implications

The concepts of drug development have evolved over the last few decades. Although number of novel chemical entitities belonging to varied classes have made it to the market, the process of drug development is challenging, intertwined as it is with complexities and uncertainities. The intention of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of novel chemical entities (NCEs) that are substrates to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 isozyme. Topics covered in this review aim: (1) to provide a framework of the importance of CYP2D6 isozyme in the biotransformation of NCEs as stand-alones and/or in conjunction with other CYP isozymes; (2) to provide several case studies of drug disposition of important drug substrates, (3) to cover key analytical perspectives and key assay considerations to assess the role and involvement of CYP2D6, and (4) to elaborate some important considerations from the development point of view. Additionally, wherever applicable, special emphasis is provided on chiral drug substrates in the various subsections of the review.

The influence of long-term treatment with psychotropic drugs on cytochrome P450: the involvement of different mechanisms

This paper emphasises that besides the direct action of psychotropic drugs on cytochrome P450 (CYP) (i.e., the binding of the parent drug to the enzyme) indirect mechanisms of CYP-psychotropic interactions, namely the formation of CYP-reactive metabolite complexes and their influence on enzyme regulation, are also very important. The described interactions that are time-, drug- and CYP isoform-dependent may overlap during long-term treatment. The final result of the overlapping depends on the dosage and time interval after the last administration of a drug, which determines the concentration of the parent drug and its metabolites in the environment of the enzyme. These interactions may occur not only in the liver, but also in the brain, and may change the activity of CYP towards the metabolism of drugs, sex steroids, neurosteroids and amine neurotransmitters. The role of the CNS in the regulation of CYP by psychotropics and the significance of CYP-psychotropic interactions for pharmacological and clinical profiling of these drugs is discussed. In addition, different experimental approaches for studying CNS-acting drugs are compared.

Inhibition of rat liver CYP2D in vitro and after 1-day and long-term exposure to neuroleptics in vivo-possible involvement of different mechanisms

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of classic and atypical neuroleptics on the activity of rat CYP2D measured as a rate of ethylmorphine O-deethylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of neuroleptics, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 1-day or 2-weeks (twice a day) with pharmacological doses of the drugs (promazine, levomepromazine, thioridazine, perazine 10 mg kg(-1); chlorpromazine 3 mg kg(-1); haloperidol 0.3 mg kg(-1); risperidone 0.1 mg kg(-1); sertindole 0.05 mg kg(-1)), in the absence of the neuroleptics in vitro. Neuroleptics added in vitro to control liver microsomes decreased the activity of the rat CYP2D by competitive or mixed inhibition of the enzyme. Thioridazine (Ki=15 microM) was the most potent inhibitor of the rat CYP2D among the drugs studied, whose effect was more pronounced than that of the other neuroleptics tested: phenothiazines (Ki=18-23 microM), haloperidol (Ki=32 microM), sertindole (Ki=51 microM) or risperidone (Ki=165 microM). The investigated neuroleptics-when given to rats in vivo-also seemed to exert an inhibitory effect on CYP2D via other mechanisms. One-day exposure of rats to the classic neuroleptics decreased the activity of CYP2D in rat liver microsomes. After chronic treatment with the investigated neuroleptics, the decreased CYP2D activity produced by the phenothiazines was still maintained, while that caused by haloperidol diminished. Moreover, risperidone decreased the activity of that enzyme. The obtained results indicate drug- and time-dependent interactions between the investigated neuroleptics and the CYP2D subfamily of rat cytochrome P-450, which may proceed via different mechanisms: (1) competitive or mixed inhibition of CYP2D shown in vitro, the inhibitory effects of phenothiazines being stronger than those of haloperidol or atypical neuroleptics, but weaker than the effects of the respective drugs on human CYP2D6; (2) in vivo inhibition of CYP2D, produced by both 1-day and chronic treatment with phenothiazines, which suggests inactivation of enzyme by intermediate metabolites; (3) in vivo inhibition of CYP2D by risperidone, produced only by chronic treatment with the drug, which suggests its influence on the enzyme regulation.

Summary of information on human CYP enzymes: human P450 metabolism data

This chapter is an update of the data on substrates, reactions, inducers, and inhibitors of human CYP enzymes published previously by Rendic and DiCarlo (1), now covering selection of the literature through 2001 in the reference section. The data are presented in a tabular form (Table 1) to provide a framework for predicting and interpreting the new P450 metabolic data. The data are formatted in an Excel format as most suitable for off-line searching and management of the Web-database. The data are presented as stated by the author(s) and in the case when several references are cited the data are presented according to the latest published information. The searchable database is available either as an Excel file (for information contact the author), or as a Web-searchable database (Human P450 Metabolism Database, www.gentest.com) enabling the readers easy and quick approach to the latest updates on human CYP metabolic reactions.

Importance of the cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype for the drug metabolic interaction between chlorpromazine and haloperidol

The authors studied the interactive effects of the coadministration of haloperidol and chlorpromazine on plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol. The subjects were 43 Japanese male schizophrenic inpatients who were concomitantly treated with chlorpromazine before or after monotherapy with haloperidol. Coadministration of chlorpromazine produced significant increases in the plasma concentrations of haloperidol (P < 0.01) and reduced haloperidol (P < 0.001) by an average of 28.5% +/- 83.3% and 160.8% +/- 288.9%, respectively. However, there were marked interindividual variations in the interactive effects of chlorpromazine. The authors analyzed the importance of five CYP2D6 genotypes, *1/ *1, *1/ *10, *10/ *10, *1/*5, and *5/*10 on the percentage of change in plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol. Patients with the CYP2D6*5 allele (n = 4) showed a significantly smaller increase in plasma concentrations of haloperidol (P < 0.05) and a slightly smaller increase in those of reduced haloperidol (P = 0.074) in response to the coadministration of chlorpromazine compared than those with the CYP2D6*1/*1 genotype (n = 8). Those with the CYP2D6*1/*1 genotype (n = 8) showed a trend toward greater increases in plasma concentrations of haloperidol than those with other genotypes (P = 0.087).

Failure to respond to treatment with typical antipsychotics is not associated with CYP2D6 ultrarapid hydroxylation

AIMS

To investigate whether or not there is a correlation between failure to respond to typical antipsychotics and CYP2D6 ultrarapid metaboliser status.

METHODS

CYP2D6 phenotype (metaboliser status) was assigned following genotyping for gene duplication, as well as for the CYP2D6*3, CYP2D6*4, and CYP2D6*5 null alleles in 235 treatment-refractory patients and 73 nonrefractory patients.

RESULTS

Four (1.7%) of the 235 treatment-refractory subjects were positive on the duplication assay, but, of these, two were found to represent duplications of a null allele (CYP2D6*4 ), therefore leaving only two (0.85%) positive for duplication of a wild type allele (ultrarapid metabolisers). Three (4.1%) of the nonrefractory subjects had a genotype consistent with ultrarapid metaboliser status. Fisher's exact test gave a two-tailed P value of 0.091, i.e. a trend towards an excess of ultrarapid metabolisers in the nonrefractory group, which was in the opposite direction to that predicted by our hypothesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the results show a trend towards an excess of ultrarapid metabolisers in the nonrefractory group, the percentages in the two groups of patients are both within the range for ultrarapid metabolisers in Caucasian populations. Our data are not consistent with ultrarapid metaboliser status being a major cause of failure to respond to typical antipsychotics.

Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with psychoactive drugs: antidepressants and antipsychotics and the cytochrome P450 system

Psychotherapeutic drugs (antipsychotics and antidepressants) are widely used for treating anxiety. Many psychotherapeutic drugs are metabolized mainly by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C19 and CYP2D6, and are often administered with other drugs. Therefore, it is necessary to be careful when co-administering psychotherapeutic drugs whose metabolism might be inhibited by other drugs. In particular, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) inhibit the metabolism of psychotherapeutic drugs mediated by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. It is useful to phenotype CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 (extensive metabolizers or poor metabolizers) before giving such medication. Knowledge of substrates, inhibitors and inducers of CYP isoenzymes may help clinicians to anticipate and avoid psychotherapeutic drug interactions and improve rational prescribing practices. In addition, genotyping for these drugs may be also useful in preventing side-effects.