In vivo imaging in experimental spinal cord injury – Techniques and trends.
BRAIN AND SPINE 2022;
2:100859. [PMID:
36248104 PMCID:
PMC9560701 DOI:
10.1016/j.bas.2021.100859]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is one of the leading causes of disability in the world. Treatment is limited to supportive care and no curative therapy exists. Experimental research to understand the complex pathophysiology and potential mediators of spinal cord regeneration is essential to develop innovative translational therapies. A multitude of experimental imaging methods to monitor spinal cord regeneration in vivo have developed over the last years. However, little literature exists to deal with advanced imaging methods specifically available in SCI research.
Research Question
This systematic literature review examines the current standards in experimental imaging in SCI allowing for in vivo imaging of spinal cord regeneration on a neuronal, vascular, and cellular basis.
Material and Methods
Articles were included meeting the following criteria: experimental research, original studies, rodent subjects, and intravital imaging. Reviewed in detail are microstructural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Micro-Computed Tomography, Laser Speckle Imaging, Very High Resolution Ultrasound, and in vivo microscopy techniques.
Results
Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, 689 articles were identified for review, of which 492 were sorted out after screening and an additional 104 after detailed review. For qualitative synthesis 93 articles were included in this publication.
Discussion and Conclusion
With this study we give an up-to-date overview about modern experimental imaging techniques with the potential to advance the knowledge on spinal cord regeneration following SCI. A thorough knowledge of the strengths and limitations of the reviewed techniques will help to optimally exploit our current experimental armamentarium in the field.
In vivo imaging is essential to enhance the understanding of SCI pathophysiology.
Multiple experimental imaging methods have evolved over the past years.
Detailed review of in vivo (f)MRI, μCT, VHRUS, and Microcopy in experimental SCI.
Experimental imaging allows for longitudinal examination to the cellular level.
Knowledge of the strengths and limitations is essential for future research.
Collapse