Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V)

Improving intracranial aneurysms image quality and diagnostic confidence with deep learning reconstruction in craniocervical CT angiography

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic impact of deep learning computed tomography (CT) reconstruction on intracranial aneurysm (IA) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To quantify the image quality and diagnostic confidence on IA in craniocervical CT angiography (CTA) reconstructed with DEep Learning Trained Algorithm (DELTA) compared to the routine hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients who underwent craniocervical CTA and were diagnosed with IA were retrospectively enrolled. Images were reconstructed with DELTA and HIR, where the image quality was first compared in noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Next, two radiologists independently graded the noise appearance, arterial sharpness, small vessel visibility, conspicuity of calcifications that may present in arteries, and overall image quality, each with a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic confidence on IAs of various sizes was also graded.

RESULTS

Significantly lower noise and higher SNR and CNR were found on DELTA than on HIR images (all P < 0.05). All five subjective metrics were scored higher by both readers on the DELTA images (all P < 0.05), with good to excellent inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.77-0.93). DELTA images were rated with higher diagnostic confidence on IAs compared to HIR (P < 0.001), particularly for those with size ≤3 mm, which were scored 4.5 ± 0.6 versus 3.4 ± 0.8 and 4.4 ± 0.7 versus 3.5 ± 0.8 by two readers, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DELTA shows potential for improving the image quality and the associated confidence in diagnosing IA that may be worth consideration for routine craniocervical CTA applications.

The effects of distance between the imaging isocenter and brain center on the image quality of cone-beam computed tomography for brain stereotactic irradiation

In linear accelerator-based stereotactic irradiation (STI) for brain metastasis, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality is essential for ensuring precise patient setup and tumor localization. However, CBCT images may be degraded by the deviation of the CBCT isocenter from the brain center. This study aims to investigate the effects of the distance from the brain center to the CBCT isocenter (DBI) on the image quality in STI. An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with varying DBI in right, anterior, superior, and inferior directions. Thirty patients undergoing STI were prospectively recruited. Objective metrics, utilizing regions of interest included contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the centrum semiovale, lateral ventricle, and basal ganglia levels, gray and white matter noise at the basal ganglia level, artifact index (AI), and nonuniformity (NU). Two radiation oncologists assessed subjective metrics. In this phantom study, objective measures indicated a degradation in image quality for non-zero DBI. In this patient study, there were significant correlations between the CNR at the centrum semiovale and lateral ventricle levels (rs = - 0.79 and - 0.77, respectively), gray matter noise (rs = 0.52), AI (rs = 0.72), and NU (rs = 0.91) and DBI. However, no significant correlations were observed between the CNR at the basal ganglia level, white matter noise, and subjective metrics and DBI (rs < ± 0.3). Our results demonstrate the effects of DBI on contrast, noise, artifacts in the posterior fossa, and uniformity of CBCT images in STI. Aligning the CBCT isocenter with the brain center can aid in improving image quality.

Assessment of image quality and impact of deep learning-based software in non-contrast head CT scans

In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the objective and subjective image quality of different reconstruction techniques and a deep learning-based software on non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) images. In total, 152 adult head CT scans (77 female, 75 male; mean age 69.4 ± 18.3 years) obtained from three different CT scanners using different protocols between March and April 2021 were included. CT images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and post-processed using a deep learning-based algorithm (PS). Post-processing significantly reduced noise in FBP-reconstructed images (up to 15.4% reduction) depending on the protocol, leading to improvements in signal-to-noise ratio of up to 19.7%. However, when deep learning-based post-processing was applied to FBP images compared to IR alone, the differences were inconsistent and partly non-significant, which appeared to be protocol or site specific. Subjective assessments showed no significant overall improvement in image quality for all reconstructions and post-processing. Inter-rater reliability was low and preferences varied. Deep learning-based denoising software improved objective image quality compared to FBP in routine head CT. A significant difference compared to IR was observed for only one protocol. Subjective assessments did not indicate a significant clinical impact in terms of improved subjective image quality, likely due to the low noise levels in full-dose images.

Influence of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for reducing radiation dose and image noise compared to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection for head and chest computed tomography examinations: a systematic review

Background

The most recent advances in Computed Tomography (CT) image reconstruction technology are Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms. Due to drawbacks in Iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques such as negative image texture and nonlinear spatial resolutions, DLIRs are gradually replacing them. However, the potential use of DLIR in Head and Chest CT has to be examined further. Hence, the purpose of the study is to review the influence of DLIR on Radiation dose (RD), Image noise (IN), and outcomes of the studies compared with IR and FBP in Head and Chest CT examinations.

Methods

We performed a detailed search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase to find the articles reported using DLIR for Head and Chest CT examinations between 2017 to 2023. Data were retrieved from the short-listed studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

Out of 196 articles searched, 15 articles were included. A total of 1292 sample size was included. 14 articles were rated as high and 1 article as moderate quality. All studies compared DLIR to IR techniques. 5 studies compared DLIR with IR and FBP. The review showed that DLIR improved IQ, and reduced RD and IN for CT Head and Chest examinations.

Conclusions

DLIR algorithm have demonstrated a noted enhancement in IQ with reduced IN for CT Head and Chest examinations at lower dose compared with IR and FBP. DLIR showed potential for enhancing patient care by reducing radiation risks and increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction in Computed Tomography Angiography: An Evaluation on Pulmonary Arteries and Aorta With Routine Dose Settings

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate whether a newly introduced deep learning-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, namely, the artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR), has a clinical value in computed tomography angiography (CTA), especially for visualizing vascular structures and related lesions, with routine dose settings.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients were retrospectively collected from the triple rule-out CTA examinations, where both pulmonary and aortic data were available for each patient and were taken as the example for investigation. The images were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and the AIIR. The visibility of vasculature and pulmonary emboli and the general image quality were assessed.

RESULTS

Artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction resulted in significantly ( P < 0.001) lower noise as well as higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio compared with FBP and HIR. Besides, AIIR achieved the highest subjective scores on general image quality ( P < 0.05). For the vasculature visibility, AIIR offered the best vessel conspicuity, especially for the small vessels ( P < 0.05). Also, >90% of emboli on the AIIR images were graded as sharp (score 5), whereas <15% of emboli on FBP and HIR images were scored 5.

CONCLUSION

As demonstrated for pulmonary and aortic CTAs, AIIR improves the image quality and offers a better depiction for vascular structures compared with FBP and HIR. The visibility of the pulmonary emboli was also increased by AIIR.

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for CCTA: Image Quality Assessment and Clinical Application

OBJECTIVE

The increasing number of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) requests raised concerns about dose exposure. New dose reduction strategies based on artificial intelligence have been proposed to overcome limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Our prospective study sought to explore the added value of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in comparison with a hybrid IR algorithm (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo [ASiR-V]) in CCTA, even in clinical challenging scenarios, as obesity, heavily calcified vessels and coronary stents.

METHODS

We prospectively included 103 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA. Data sets were reconstructed with ASiR-V and DLIR. For each reconstruction signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated, and qualitative assessment was made with a four-point Likert scale by two independent and blinded radiologists with different expertise.

RESULTS

Both SNR and CNR were significantly higher in DLIR (SNR-DLIR median value [interquartile range] of 13.89 [11.06-16.35] and SNR-ASiR-V 25.42 [22.46-32.22], P < 0.001; CNR-DLIR 16.84 [9.83-27.08] vs CNR-ASiR-V 10.09 [5.69-13.5], P < 0.001).Median qualitative score was 4 for DLIR images versus 3 for ASiR-V ( P < 0.001), with a good interreader reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient(2,1)e intraclass correlation coefficient(3,1) 0.60 for DLIR and 0.62 and 0.73 for ASiR-V].In the obese and in the "calcifications and stents" groups, DLIR showed significantly higher values of SNR (24.23 vs 11.11, P < 0.001 and 24.55 vs 14.09, P < 0.001, respectively) and CNR (16.08 vs 8.04, P = 0.008 and 17.31 vs 10.14, P = 0.003) and image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep-learning image reconstruction in CCTA allows better SNR, CNR, and qualitative assessment than ASiR-V, with an added value in the most challenging clinical scenarios.

A CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm: Image quality evaluation for brain protocol at decreasing dose indexes in comparison with FBP and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms

PURPOSE

To characterise the impact of Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction algorithm on image quality, compared to filtered back-projection (FBP) and iDose4 iterative reconstruction for brain computed tomography (CT) phantom images.

METHODS

Catphan-600 phantom was acquired with an Incisive CT scanner using a dedicated brain protocol, at six different dose levels (volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol): 7/14/29/49/56/67 mGy). Images were reconstructed using FBP, levels 2/5 of iDose4, and PI algorithm (Sharper/Sharp/Standard/Smooth/Smoother). Image quality was assessed by evaluating CT numbers, image histograms, noise, image non-uniformity (NU), noise power spectrum, target transfer function, and detectability index.

RESULTS

The five PI levels did not significantly affect the mean CT number. For a given CTDIvol using Sharper-to-Smoother levels, the spatial resolution for all the investigated materials and the detectability index increased while the noise magnitude decreased, slightly affecting noise texture. For a fixed PI level increasing the CTDIvol the detectability index increased, the noise magnitude decreased. From 29 mGy, NU values converged within 1 Hounsfield Unit from each other without a substantial improvement at higher CTDIvol values.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved performances of intermediate PI levels in brain protocols compared to conventional algorithms seem to suggest a potential reduction of CTDIvol.

Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in dual-energy spectral CT (DEsCT) as a function of radiation dose and image energy level, in comparison with filtered-back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithms.

METHODS

An ACR464 phantom was scanned with DEsCT at four dose levels (3.5 mGy, 5 mGy, 7.5 mGy, and 10 mGy). Virtual monochromatic images were reconstructed at five energy levels (40 keV, 50 keV, 68 keV, 74 keV, and 140 keV) using FBP, 50% and 100% ASIR-V, DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) settings. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed and compared among reconstructions.

RESULTS

NPS area and noise increased as keV decreased, with DLIR having slower increase than FBP and ASIR-V, and DLIR-H having the lowest values. DLIR had the best 40 keV/140 keV noise ratio at various energy levels, DLIR showed higher TTF (50%) than ASIR-V for all materials, especially for the soft tissue-like polystyrene insert, and DLIR-M and DLIR-H provided higher d' than DLIR-L, ASIR-V and FBP in all dose and energy levels. As keV increases, d' increased for acrylic insert, and d' of the 50 keV DLIR-M and DLIR-H images at 3.5 mGy (7.39 and 8.79, respectively) were higher than that (7.20) of the 50 keV ASIR-V50% images at 10 mGy.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR provides better noise containment for low keV images in DEsCT and higher TTF(50%) for the polystyrene insert over ASIR-V. DLIR-H has the lowest image noise and highest detectability in all dose and energy levels. DEsCT 50 keV images with DLIR-M and DLIR-H show potential for 65% dose reduction over ASIR-V50% withhigher d'.

Deep learning reconstruction for improving the visualization of acute brain infarct on computed tomography

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on acute infarct depiction compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 29 (75.8 ± 13.2 years, 20 males) and 26 (64.4 ± 12.4 years, 18 males) patients with and without acute infarction, respectively. Unenhanced head CT images were reconstructed with DLR and Hybrid IR. In qualitative analyses, three readers evaluated the conspicuity of lesions based on five regions and image quality. A radiologist placed regions of interest on the lateral ventricle, putamen, and white matter in quantitative analyses, and the standard deviation of CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise) was recorded.

RESULTS

Conspicuity of acute infarct in DLR was superior to that in Hybrid IR, and a statistically significant difference was observed for two readers (p ≤ 0.038). Conspicuity of acute infarct with time from onset to CT imaging at < 24 h in DLR was significantly improved compared with Hybrid IR for all readers (p ≤ 0.020). Image noise in DLR was significantly reduced compared with Hybrid IR with both the qualitative and quantitative analyses (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

DLR in head CT helped improve acute infarct depiction, especially those with time from onset to CT imaging at < 24 h.

A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Computed tomography (CT) is used in a wide range of medical imaging diagnoses. However, the reconstruction of CT images from raw projection data is inherently complex and is subject to artifacts and noise, which compromises image quality and accuracy. In order to address these challenges, deep learning developments have the potential to improve the reconstruction of computed tomography images. In this regard, our research aim is to determine the techniques that are used for 3D deep learning in CT reconstruction and to identify the training and validation datasets that are accessible. This research was performed on five databases. After a careful assessment of each record based on the objective and scope of the study, we selected 60 research articles for this review. This systematic literature review revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were the most suitable deep learning algorithms for CT reconstruction. Additionally, two major datasets appropriate for training and developing deep learning systems were identified: 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo and MSCT. These datasets are important resources for the creation and assessment of CT reconstruction models. According to the results, 3D deep learning may increase the effectiveness of CT image reconstruction, boost image quality, and lower radiation exposure. By using these deep learning approaches, CT image reconstruction may be made more precise and effective, improving patient outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare system productivity.

Accuracy of liver metastasis detection and characterization: Dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT with deep learning reconstruction

PURPOSE

To assess whether image quality differences between SECT (single-energy CT) and DECT (dual-energy CT 70 keV) with equivalent radiation doses result in altered detection and characterization accuracy of liver metastases when using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), and whether DECT spectral curve usage improves accuracy of indeterminate lesion characterization.

METHODS

In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (March through August 2022), adult men and non-pregnant adult women with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases underwent SECT (120 kVp) and a DECT (70 keV) portovenous abdominal CT scan using DLIR in the same breath-hold (Revolution CT ES; GE Healthcare). Participants were excluded if consent could not be obtained, if there were nonequivalent radiation doses between the two scans, or if the examination was cancelled/rescheduled. Three radiologists independently performed lesion detection and characterization during two separate sessions (SECT DLIRmedium and DECT DLIRhigh) as well as reported lesion confidence and overall image quality. Hounsfield units were measured. Spectral HU curves were provided for any lesions rated as indeterminate. McNemar's test was used to test the marginal homogeneity in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, accuracy and lesion detection. A generalized estimating equation method was used for categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

30 participants (mean age, 58 years ± 11, 21 men) were evaluated. Mean CTDIvol was 34 mGy for both scans. 141 lesions (124 metastases, 17 benign) with a mean size of 0.8 cm ± 0.3 cm were identified. High scores for image quality (scores of 4 or 5) were not significantly different between DECT (N = 71 out of 90 total scores from the three readers) and SECT (N = 62) (OR, 2.01; 95% CI:0.89, 4.57; P = 0.093). Equivalent image noise to SECT DLIRmed (HU SD 10 ± 2) was obtained with DECT DLIRhigh (HU SD 10 ± 3) (P = 1). There was no significant difference in lesion detection between DECT and SECT (140/141 lesions) (99.3%; 95% CI:96.1%, 100%).The mean lesion confidence scores by each reader were 4.2 ± 1.3, 3.9 ± 1.0, and 4.8 ± 0.8 for SECT and 4.1 ± 1.4, 4.0 ± 1.0, and 4.7 ± 0.8 for DECT (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.11; P = 0.21). Small lesion (≤5mm) characterization accuracy on SECT and DECT was 89.1% (95% CI:76.4%, 96.4%; 41/46) and 84.8% (71.1%, 93.7%; 39/46), respectively (P = 0.41). Use of spectral HU lesion curves resulted in 34 correct changes in characterizations and no mischaracterizations.

CONCLUSION

DECT required a higher strength of DLIR to obtain equivalent noise compared to SECT DLIR. At equivalent radiation doses and image noise, there was no significant difference in subjective image quality or observer lesion performance between DECT (70 keV) and SECT. However, DECT spectral HU curves of indeterminate lesions improved characterization.

Implementation of AI image reconstruction in CT-how is it validated and what dose reductions can be achieved

CT reconstruction has undergone a substantial change over the last decade with the introduction of iterative reconstruction (IR) and now with deep learning reconstruction (DLR). In this review, DLR will be compared to IR and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstructions. Comparisons will be made using image quality metrics such as noise power spectrum, contrast-dependent task-based transfer function, and non-prewhitening filter detectability index (dNPW'). Discussion on how DLR has impacted CT image quality, low-contrast detectability, and diagnostic confidence will be provided. DLR has shown the ability to improve in areas that IR is lacking, namely: noise magnitude reduction does not alter noise texture to the degree that IR did, and the noise texture found in DLR is more aligned with noise texture of an FBP reconstruction. Additionally, the dose reduction potential for DLR is shown to be greater than IR. For IR, the consensus was dose reduction should be limited to no more than 15-30% to preserve low-contrast detectability. For DLR, initial phantom and patient observer studies have shown acceptable dose reduction between 44 and 83% for both low- and high-contrast object detectability tasks. Ultimately, DLR is able to be used for CT reconstruction in place of IR, making it an easy "turnkey" upgrade for CT reconstruction. DLR for CT is actively being improved as more vendor options are being developed and current DLR options are being enhanced with second generation algorithms being released. DLR is still in its developmental early stages, but is shown to be a promising future for CT reconstruction.

Dose Optimization Using a Deep Learning Tool in Various CT Protocols for Urolithiasis: A Physical Human Phantom Study

Background and Objectives: We attempted to determine the optimal radiation dose to maintain image quality using a deep learning application in a physical human phantom. Materials and Methods: Three 5 × 5 × 5 mm3 uric acid stones were placed in a physical human phantom in various locations. Three tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kV) and four current-time products (100, 70, 30, and 15 mAs) were implemented in 12 scans. Each scan was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (IR, iDose), and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR). By applying deep learning to each image, we took 12 more scans. Objective image assessments were calculated using the standard deviation of the Hounsfield unit (HU). Subjective image assessments were performed by one radiologist and one urologist. Two radiologists assessed the subjective assessment and found the stone under the absence of information. We used this data to calculate the diagnostic accuracy. Results: Objective image noise was decreased after applying a deep learning tool in all images of FBP, iDose, and IMR. There was no statistical difference between iDose and deep learning-applied FBP images (10.1 ± 11.9, 9.5 ± 18.5 HU, p = 0.583, respectively). At a 100 kV-30 mAs setting, deep learning-applied FBP obtained a similar objective noise in approximately one third of the radiation doses compared to FBP. In radiation doses with settings lower than 100 kV-30 mAs, the subject image assessment (image quality, confidence level, and noise) showed deteriorated scores. Diagnostic accuracy was increased when the deep learning setting was lower than 100 kV-30 mAs, except for at 80 kV-15 mAs. Conclusions: At the setting of 100 kV-30 mAs or higher, deep learning-applied FBP did not differ in image quality compared to IR. At the setting of 100 kV-30 mAs, the radiation dose can decrease by about one third while maintaining objective noise.

Deep Learning-Based Versus Iterative Image Reconstruction for Unenhanced Brain CT: A Quantitative Comparison of Image Quality

This exploratory retrospective study aims to quantitatively compare the image quality of unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with an iterative (AIDR-3D) and a deep learning-based (AiCE) reconstruction algorithm. After a preliminary phantom study, AIDR-3D and AiCE reconstructions (0.5 mm thickness) of 100 consecutive brain CTs acquired in the emergency setting on the same 320-detector row CT scanner were retrospectively analyzed, calculating image noise reduction attributable to the AiCE algorithm, artifact indexes in the posterior cranial fossa, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) at the cortical and thalamic levels. In the phantom study, the spatial resolution of the two datasets proved to be comparable; conversely, AIDR-3D reconstructions showed a broader noise pattern. In the human study, median image noise was lower with AiCE compared to AIDR-3D (4.7 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001, median 19.6% noise reduction), whereas AIDR-3D yielded a lower artifact index than AiCE (7.5 vs. 8.4, p < 0.001). AiCE also showed higher median CNRs at the cortical (2.5 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001) and thalamic levels (2.8 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001). These results highlight how image quality improvements granted by deep learning-based (AiCE) and iterative (AIDR-3D) image reconstruction algorithms vary according to different brain areas.

Image Quality Improvement in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction of Head Computed Tomography Examination

In this study, we assess image quality in computed tomography scans reconstructed via DLIR (Deep Learning Image Reconstruction) and compare it with iterative reconstruction ASIR-V (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction) in CT (computed tomography) scans of the head. The CT scans of 109 patients were subjected to both objective and subjective evaluation of image quality. The objective evaluation was based on the SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and CNR (contrast-to-noise ratio) of the brain's gray and white matter. The regions of interest for our study were set in the BGA (basal ganglia area) and PCF (posterior cranial fossa). Simultaneously, a subjective assessment of image quality, based on brain structure visibility, was conducted by experienced radiologists. In the assessed scans, we obtained up to a 54% increase in SNR for gray matter and a 60% increase for white matter using DLIR in comparison to ASIR-V. Moreover, we achieved a CNR increment of 58% in the BGA structures and 50% in the PCF. In the subjective assessment of the obtained images, DLIR had a mean rating score of 2.8, compared to the mean score of 2.6 for ASIR-V images. In conclusion, DLIR shows improved image quality compared to the standard iterative reconstruction of CT images of the head.

Application of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Dynamic Abdominal CT: Comparison with Standard-Dose CT Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Method

The purpose is to evaluate whether deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm provides sufficient image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a 30% reduction in radiation dose, compared to standard-dose CT reconstructed with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). The subjects consisted of 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with standard dose and reconstructed with hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and another 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with approximately 30% less dose and reconstructed with ASiR-V50% and DLD at low-, medium- and high-strength (DLD-L, DLD-M and DLD-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for portal vein on portal venous phase was calculated. Lesion conspicuity in 23 abdominal solid mass on the reduced-dose CT was rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). Compared with hybrid IR of standard-dose CT, DLD-H of reduced-dose CT provided significantly lower image noise (portal phase: 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.7-9.4) HU vs 12.0 (11.4-12.7) HU, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher CNR (median, 5.8 (4.4-7.4) vs 4.3 (3.3-5.3), P = 0.0019). As for DLD-M of reduced-dose CT, no significant difference was found in image noise and CNR compared to hybrid IR of standard-dose CT (P > 0.99). Lesion conspicuity scores for DLD-H and DLD-M were significantly better than hybrid IR (P < 0.05). Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquired with approximately 30% lower radiation dose and generated with the DLD algorithm exhibit lower image noise and higher CNR compared to standard-dose CT with hybrid IR.

Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured.

RESULTS

The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1 s, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time.

KEY POINTS

• For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. • The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24 s vs. 11 s). • Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility.

An optimized EBRSA-Bi LSTM model for highly undersampled rapid CT image reconstruction

COVID-19 has spread all over the world, causing serious panic around the globe. Chest computed tomography (CT) images are integral in confirming COVID positive patients. Several investigations were conducted to improve or maintain the image reconstruction quality for the sample image reconstruction. Deep learning (DL) methods have recently been proposed to achieve fast reconstruction, but many have focused on a single domain, such as the image domain of k-space. In this research, the highly under-sampled enhanced battle royale self-attention based bi-directional long short-term (EBRSA-bi LSTM) CT image reconstruction model is proposed to reconstruct the image from the under-sampled data. The research is adapted with two phases, namely, pre-processing and reconstruction. The extended cascaded filter (ECF) is proposed for image pre-processing and tends to suppress the noise and enhance the reconstruction accuracy. In the reconstruction model, the battle royale optimization (BrO) is intended to diminish the loss function of the reconstruction network model and weight updation. The proposed model is tested with two datasets, COVID-CT- and SARS-CoV-2 CT. The reconstruction accuracy of the proposed model with two datasets is 93.5 % and 97.7 %, respectively. Also, the image quality assessment parameters such as Peak-Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Structural Similarity Index metric (SSIM) are evaluated, and it yields an outcome of (45 and 46 dB), (0.0026 and 0.0022) and (0.992, 0.996) with two datasets.

A Characterization of Deep Learning Reconstruction Applied to Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Monochromatic and Material Basis Images

OBJECTIVE

Advancements in computed tomography (CT) reconstruction have enabled image quality improvements and dose reductions. Previous advancements have included iterative and model-based reconstruction. The latest image reconstruction advancement uses deep learning, which has been evaluated for polychromatic imaging only. This article characterizes a commercially available deep learning imaging reconstruction applied to dual-energy CT.

METHODS

Monochromatic, iodine basis, and water basis images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), iterative (ASiR-V), and deep learning (DLIR) methods in a phantom experiment. Slice thickness, contrast-to-noise ratio, modulation transfer function, and noise power spectrum metrics were used to characterize ASiR-V and DLIR relative to FBP over a range of dose levels, phantom sizes, and iodine concentrations.

RESULTS

Slice thicknesses for ASiR-V and DLIR demonstrated no statistically significant difference relative to FBP for all measurement conditions. Contrast-to-noise ratio performance for DLIR-high and ASiR-V 40% at 2 mg I/mL on 40-keV images were 162% and 30% higher than FBP, respectively. Task-based modulation transfer function measurements demonstrated no clinically significant change between FBP and ASiR-V and DLIR on monochromatic or iodine basis images.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning image reconstruction enabled better image quality at lower monochromatic energies and on iodine basis images where image contrast is maximized relative to polychromatic or high-energy monochromatic images. Deep learning image reconstruction did not demonstrate thicker slices, decreased spatial resolution, or poor noise texture (ie, "plastic") relative to FBP.

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects

Filtered back projection (FBP) has been the standard CT image reconstruction method for 4 decades. A simple, fast, and reliable technique, FBP has delivered high-quality images in several clinical applications. However, with faster and more advanced CT scanners, FBP has become increasingly obsolete. Higher image noise and more artifacts are especially noticeable in lower-dose CT imaging using FBP. This performance gap was partly addressed by model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Yet, its "plastic" image appearance and long reconstruction times have limited widespread application. Hybrid iterative reconstruction partially addressed these limitations by blending FBP with MBIR and is currently the state-of-the-art reconstruction technique. In the past 5 years, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques have become increasingly popular. DLR uses artificial intelligence to reconstruct high-quality images from lower-dose CT faster than MBIR. However, the performance of DLR algorithms relies on the quality of data used for model training. Higher-quality training data will become available with photon-counting CT scanners. At the same time, spectral data would greatly benefit from the computational abilities of DLR. This review presents an overview of the principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications of DLR, including metal artifact reduction algorithms. In addition, emerging applications and prospects are discussed.

Improving image quality with deep learning image reconstruction in double-low-dose head CT angiography compared with standard dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate similar image quality with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in reduced contrast medium (CM) and radiation dose (double-low-dose) head CT angiography (CTA), in comparison with standard-dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V).

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 63 patients who under head CTA using 256-slice CT. Patients were randomized into either the standard-dose group (n = 38) with 40 ml of Iopromide (370 mgI ml-1 at 4.5 ml s-1); or a double-low-dose group (n = 25) with CM of 25 ml at 3.0 ml s-1. For image reconstruction, the double-low-dose group used DLIR-M and DLIR-H strength, and the standard-dose group used ASIR-V with 50% strength. The CT value and standard deviation, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of posterior fossa, neck muscles, carotid, vertebral and middle cerebral arteries were measured. The image noise, vessel edge and structure blurring and overall image quality were assessed by using a 5-grade method. The double-low-dose group reduced CM dose by 37.5% and CT dose index by 41% compared with the standard-dose group. DLIR further reduced the standard deviation value of the middle cerebral artery and posterior fossa and provided better overall subjective image quality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduces image noise and provides higher overall image quality in the double-low-dose CTA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

It is feasible to reduce CM dose by 37.5% and volume CT dose index by 41% with the combination of 80 kVp and DLIR in head CTA. Compared with ASIR-V, DLIR further reduces image noise and achieves better image quality with reduced contrast and radiation dose.

Deep learning reconstruction allows for usage of contrast agent of lower concentration for coronary CTA than filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The demand for homogeneous and higher vascular contrast enhancement is critical to provide an appropriate interpretation of abnormal vascular findings in coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of various contrast media concentrations (Iohexol-370, Iohexol-300, Iohexol-240) and image reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], hybrid iterative reconstruction [IR], and deep learning reconstruction [DLR]) on coronary CTA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients referred for coronary CTA between July and October 2021 were enrolled in this prospective study, and they randomly received one of three contrast media. CTA images were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR, and DLR. The CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for all three images. The images were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, image noise, and vessel wall delineation on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The application of DLR resulted in significantly lower image noise; higher CT attenuation, SNR, and CNR; and better subjective analysis among the three different concentrations of contrast media groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CT attenuation of the left ventricle (P = 0.089) and coronary arteries (P = 0.072) between hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 and DLR at Iohexol-240. Furthermore, application of DLR to the Iohexol-240 significantly improved SNR and CNR; it achieved higher subjective scores compared with hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that using DLR with Iohexol-240 contrast media is preferable to hybrid IR with Iohexol-300 contrast media in coronary CTA.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients (29 males) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA from April to December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Fourteen datasets were reconstructed for each patient: three DLIR strength levels (DLIR_L, DLIR_M, and DLIR_H), ASiR-V from 10% to 100% in 10%-increment, and filtered back-projection (FBP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) determined objective image quality. Subjective image quality was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. Concordance between reconstruction algorithms was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

DLIR algorithm did not impact vascular attenuation (P ≥ 0.374). DLIR_H showed the lowest noise, comparable with ASiR-V 100% (P = 1) and significantly lower than other reconstructions (P ≤ 0.021). DLIR_H achieved the highest objective quality, with SNR and CNR comparable to ASiR-V 100% (P = 0.139 and 0.075, respectively). DLIR_M obtained comparable objective image quality with ASiR-V 80% and 90% (P ≥ 0.281), while achieved the highest subjective image quality (4, IQR: 4-4; P ≤ 0.001). DLIR and ASiR-V datasets returned a very strong correlation in the assessment of CAD (r = 0.874, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DLIR_M significantly improves CCTA image quality and has very strong correlation with routinely applied ASiR-V 50% dataset in the diagnosis of CAD.

Ultra-low-dose CT lung screening with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction: evaluation via automatic nodule-detection software

AIM

To test the feasibility of ultra-low-dose (ULD) computed tomography (CT) combined with an artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) algorithm for screening pulmonary nodules using computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A chest phantom with artificial pulmonary nodules was first scanned using the routine protocol and the ULD protocol (3.28 versus 0.18 mSv) to compare the image quality and to test the acceptability of the ULD CT protocol. Next, 147 lung-screening patients were enrolled prospectively, undergoing an additional ULD CT immediately after their routine CT examination for clinical validation. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), the AIIR, and were imported to the CAD software for preliminary nodule detection. Subjective image quality on the phantom was scored using a five-point scale and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Nodule detection using CAD was evaluated for ULD HIR and AIIR images using the routine dose image as reference.

RESULTS

Higher image quality was scored for AIIR than for FBP and HIR at ULD (p<0.001). As reported by CAD, 107 patients were presented with more than five nodules on routine dose images and were chosen to represent the challenging cases at an early stage of pulmonary disease. Among such, the performance of nodule detection by CAD on ULD HIR and AIIR images was 75.2% and 92.2% of the routine dose image, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combined with AIIR, it was feasible to use an ULD CT protocol with 95% dose reduction for CAD-based screening of pulmonary nodules.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm reduces image noise while alters radiomics features in dual-energy CT in comparison with conventional iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality between a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm and conventional iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in dual-energy CT (DECT) and to assess the impact of these algorithms on radiomics robustness.

METHODS

A phantom with clinical-relevant densities was imaged on seven DECT scanners with the same voxel size using typical abdominal-pelvis examination protocols. On one DECT scanner, raw data were reconstructed using both conventional IR (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V, ASIR-V) and DLIR. Nine sets of corresponding images were generated on other six DECT scanners using scanner-equipped conventional IR. Regions of interest were delineated through rigid registrations. Image quality was compared. Pyradiomics platform was used for radiomics feature extraction. Test-retest repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis for repeated scans. Inter-reconstruction algorithm reproducibility between conventional IR and DLIR was tested by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-scanner reproducibility was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD). Robust features were identified.

RESULTS

DLIR significantly improved image quality. Ninety-four radiomics features were extracted and nine features were considered as robust. 93.87% features were repeatable between repeated scans. ASIR-V images showed higher reproducibility to other conventional IR than DLIR (ICC mean, 0.603 vs 0.558, p = 0.001; CCC mean, 0.554 vs 0.510, p = 0.004). 7.45% and 26.83% features were reproducible among scanners evaluated by CV and QCD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR improves quality of DECT images but may alter radiomics features compared to conventional IR. Nine robust DECT radiomics features were identified.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR improves DECT image quality in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio compared with ASIR-V and showed the highest noise reduction rate and lowest peak frequency shift. • Most of radiomics features are repeatable between repeated DECT scans, while inter-reconstruction algorithm reproducibility between conventional IR and DLIR, and inter-scanner reproducibility, are low. • Although DLIR may alter radiomics features compared to IR algorithms, nine radiomics features survived repeatability and reproducibility analysis among DECT scanners and reconstruction algorithms, which allows further validation and clinical-relevant analysis.

"Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels"

PURPOSE

To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose⁴ (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose- and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose⁴ TTFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose⁴; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.

Contribution of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for dose optimization in lumbar spine CT examination: A phantom study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality and radiation dose compared with iterative reconstruction algorithm in lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using a tube current modulation system for four DoseRight Indexes (DRI) (i.e., 26/23/20/15). Raw data were reconstructed using the Level 4 of iDose⁴ (i4) and three levels of AI-DLR (Smoother/Smooth/Standard) with a bone reconstruction kernel. The Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed (d' modeled detection of a lytic and a sclerotic bone lesions). Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists.

RESULTS

The Noise magnitude was lower with AI-DLR than i4 and decreased from Standard to Smooth (-31 ± 0.1 [SD]%) and Smooth to Smoother (-48 ± 0.1 [SD]%). The average NPS spatial frequency was similar with i4 (0.43 ± 0.01 [SD] mm^-1) and Standard (0.42 ± 0.01 [SD] mm^-1) but decreased from Standard to Smoother (0.36 ± 0.01 [SD] mm^-1). TTF values at 50% decreased as the dose decreased but were similar with i4 and all AI-DLR levels. For both simulated lesions, d' values increased from Standard to Smoother levels. Higher detectabilities were found with a DRI at 15 and Smooth and Smoother levels than with a DRI at 26 and i4. The images obtained with these dose and AI-DLR levels were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Using Smooth and Smoother levels with CT allows a significant dose reduction (up to 72%) with a high detectability of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions and a clinical overall image quality.

Evaluation of image quality, organ doses, effective dose, and cancer risk from pediatric brain CT scans

PURPOSE

The present study was conducted to assess organ doses, effective dose, and image quality, and to estimate the risk of exposure-induced cancer death (REID) in pediatric brain computed tomography examinations.

METHODS

This investigation was performed on 179 pediatric patients (99 men and 80 women) under 12 years old who underwent non-contrast brain CT scans. Patients were classified into four age groups of ≤ 1, 2-5, 6-9, and 10-12 years old. Organ doses and effective doses were calculated using the ImpactDose program. Cancer risk models presented in the BEIR VII report were used to estimate REID values. Image quality assessment in this study was performed by measuring image quality parameters such as noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).

RESULTS

The highest organ dose in all age groups belonged to the brain. The mean REID values were 12.34 per 100,000 males and 16.77 per 100,000 females. REID values decreased with the increasing age of patients in both genders and were higher for female children than male children. The mean SNR of gray matter, SNR of white matter, and CNR were 11.04, 10.5, and 2.31, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this study, brain CT scans in children are associated with an increased potential risk of cancer. Therefore, minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure in pediatric patients and using alternative imaging modalities are of particular importance. Moreover, optimizing the radiation parameters while maintaining the diagnostic image quality in children should be considered.

Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (Precise Image; AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality against a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm in abdominal CT for different clinical indications.

METHODS

Acquisitions on phantoms were performed at 5 dose levels (CTDI_vol: 13/11/9/6/1.8 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using level 4 of iDose⁴ (i4) and 3 levels of AI-DLR (Smoother/Smooth/Standard). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed: d' modelled detection of a liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma at portal (HCCp) and arterial (HCCa) phases. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by 2 radiologists.

RESULTS

From Standard to Smoother levels, noise magnitude and average NPS spatial frequency decreased and the detectability (d') of all simulated lesions increased. For both inserts, TTF values were similar for all three AI-DLR levels from 13 to 6 mGy but decreased from Standard to Smoother levels at 1.8 mGy. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d' values were higher using the Smoother and Smooth levels and close for the Standard level. For all dose levels, except at 1.8 mGy, radiologists considered images satisfactory for clinical use for the 3 levels of AI-DLR, but rated images too smooth using the Smoother level.

CONCLUSION

Use of the Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduces the image noise and improves the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. Using the Smooth level is apparently the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality.

KEY POINTS

• Evaluation of the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (AI-DLR) on image quality and dose compared to a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduced the image noise and improved the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. • The Smooth level seems the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality.

Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases

Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold. Three radiologists detected and characterized lesions at standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR, reported confidence, and scored image quality. Contrast-to-noise ratios for liver metastases were recorded. Summary statistics were reported, and a generalized linear mixed model was used. Results Fifty-one participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 13; 31 men) were evaluated. The mean volume CT dose index was 65.1% lower with reduced-dose CT (12.2 mGy) than with standard-dose CT (34.9 mGy). A total of 161 lesions (127 metastases, 34 benign lesions) with a mean size of 0.7 cm ± 0.3 were identified. Subjective image quality of reduced-dose DLIR was superior to that of standard-dose FBP (P < .001). The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for liver metastases of reduced-dose DLIR (3.9 ± 1.7) was higher than that of standard-dose FBP (3.5 ± 1.4) (P < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions 0.5 cm or smaller: 63 of 65 lesions detected with standard-dose FBP (96.9%; 95% CI: 89.3, 99.6) and 47 lesions with reduced-dose DLIR (72.3%; 95% CI: 59.8, 82.7). Lesion accuracy with standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR was 80.1% (95% CI: 73.1, 86.0; 129 of 161 lesions) and 67.1% (95% CI: 59.3, 74.3; 108 of 161 lesions), respectively (P = .01). Lower lesion confidence was reported with a reduced dose (P < .001). Conclusion Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improved CT image quality at 65% radiation dose reduction while preserving detection of liver lesions larger than 0.5 cm. Reduced-dose DLIR demonstrated overall inferior characterization of liver lesions and reader confidence. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03151564 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to improve the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the abdomen, compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

This study included 40 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the abdomen. Virtual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV and iodine density images were reconstructed using three reconstruction algorithms, including hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity) at medium- and high-strength level (DLIR-M and DLIR-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the portal vein on portal venous phase CT was calculated. The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality were graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The comparative scale of lesion conspicuity in 47 abdominal solid lesions was evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior).

RESULTS

The image noise of virtual monochromatic 40-, 50 -, and 70-keV and iodine density images was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The CNR was significantly higher in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality scores were also significantly greater in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.05). The lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H were significantly higher than those for hybrid IR in the virtual monochromatic image of all energy levels (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR improves vessel conspicuity, CNR, and lesion conspicuity of virtual monochromatic and iodine density images in abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT, compared to hybrid IR.

KEY POINTS

• Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is useful for reducing image noise and improving the CNR of visual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV images in dual-energy CT. • DLIR can improve lesion conspicuity of abdominal solid lesions on virtual monochromatic images compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction. • DLIR can also be applied to iodine density maps and significantly improves their image quality.

Deep Learning Reconstruction Shows Better Lung Nodule Detection for Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT

Background Ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT could facilitate the clinical implementation of large-scale lung cancer screening while minimizing the radiation dose. However, traditional image reconstruction methods are associated with image noise in low-dose acquisitions. Purpose To compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) in ULD CT. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent noncontrast ULD CT (performed at 0.07 or 0.14 mSv, similar to a single chest radiograph) and contrast-enhanced chest CT (CECT) from April to June 2020 were included in this prospective study. ULD CT images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V, and DLIR. Three-dimensional segmentation of lung tissue was performed to evaluate image noise. Radiologists detected and measured nodules with use of a deep learning-based nodule assessment system and recognized malignancy-related imaging features. Bland-Altman analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to evaluate the differences between ULD CT images and CECT images. Results A total of 203 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 61 years ± 12; 129 men) with 1066 nodules were included, with 100 scans at 0.07 mSv and 103 scans at 0.14 mSv. The mean lung tissue noise ± standard deviation was 46 HU ± 4 for CECT and 59 HU ± 4, 56 HU ± 4, 53 HU ± 4, 54 HU ± 4, and 51 HU ± 4 in FBP, ASIR-V level 40%, ASIR-V level 80% (ASIR-V-80%), medium-strength DLIR, and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H), respectively, of ULD CT scans (P < .001). The nodule detection rates of FBP reconstruction, ASIR-V-80%, and DLIR-H were 62.5% (666 of 1066 nodules), 73.3% (781 of 1066 nodules), and 75.8% (808 of 1066 nodules), respectively (P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis showed the percentage difference in long diameter from that of CECT was 9.3% (95% CI of the mean: 8.0, 10.6), 9.2% (95% CI of the mean: 8.0, 10.4), and 6.2% (95% CI of the mean: 5.0, 7.4) in FBP reconstruction, ASIR-V-80%, and DLIR-H, respectively (P < .001). Conclusion Compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V, deep learning image reconstruction reduced image noise, increased nodule detection rate, and improved measurement accuracy on ultra-low-dose chest CT images. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee in this issue.

Deep learning versus iterative image reconstruction algorithm for head CT in trauma

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality between a deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR) and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V) in noncontrast trauma head CT.

METHODS

Head CT scans from 94 consecutive trauma patients were included. Images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 50% and the DLIR strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). The image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively and compared between the different reconstruction algorithms. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by weighted kappa.

RESULTS

DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated lower image noise (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), higher SNR of up to 82.9% (p < 0.001), and higher CNR of up to 53.3% (p < 0.001) compared to ASiR-V. DLIR-H outperformed other DLIR strengths (p ranging from < 0.001 to 0.016). DLIR-M outperformed DLIR-L (p < 0.001) and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). The distribution of reader scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H shifted towards higher scores compared to DLIR-L and ASiR-V. There was a tendency towards higher scores with increasing DLIR strengths. There were fewer non-diagnostic CT series for DLIR-M and DLIR-H compared to ASiR-V and DLIR-L. No images were graded as non-diagnostic for DLIR-H regarding intracranial hemorrhage. The inter-reader agreement was fair-good between the second most and the less experienced reader, poor-moderate between the most and the less experienced reader, and poor-fair between the most and the second most experienced reader.

CONCLUSION

The image quality of trauma head CT series reconstructed with DLIR outperformed those reconstructed with ASiR-V. In particular, DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated significantly improved image quality and fewer non-diagnostic images. The improvement in qualitative image quality was greater for the second most and the less experienced readers compared to the most experienced reader.

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced renal and adrenal computed tomography (CT) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V).

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 52 patients. All images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR at low, medium, and high reconstruction strengths. CT number, noise, noise reduction rate, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured and calculated within the region of interest (ROI) on subcutaneous fat, bilateral renal cortices, renal medulla, renal arteries, and adrenal glands. For qualitative analyses, the differentiation of the renal cortex and medulla, conspicuity of the adrenal gland boundary, sharpness, artifacts, and subjective noise were assessed. The overall image quality was calculated on a scale from 0 (worst) to 15 (best) based on the five values above and the score≥9 was acceptable.

RESULTS

CT number does not significantly differ between the reconstruction datasets. Noise does not significantly differ between ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L, but it is significantly lower using ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H. The noise reduction rate relative to ASiR-V 30% is significantly different between the DLIR groups and ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR-H yields the highest noise reduction rate (61.6%). SNR and CNR are higher for DLIR-M, DLIR-H, and ASiR-V 70% than for ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L. DLIR-H shows the best SNR and CNR. The overall image quality yields the same pattern for DLIR-H, with the highest score. Percentages of cases with overall image quality score≥9 are 100% (DLIR-H), 94.23% (DLIR-M), 90.38% (ASiR-V70%), 67.31% (DLIR-L), and 63.46% (ASiR-V30%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR significantly improved the objective and subjective image quality of renal and adrenal CTs, yielding superior noise reduction compared with ASiR-V.

A deep-learning reconstruction algorithm that improves the image quality of low-tube-voltage coronary CT angiography

PURPOSE

To assess the image quality (IQ) of low tube voltage coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR).

METHODS

According to body mass index (BMI), eighty patients who underwent 70kVp CCTA (Group A, N = 40, BMI ≤ 26 kg/m2) or 80kVp CCTA (Group B, N = 40, BMI > 26 kg/m2) were prospectively included. All images were reconstructed with four algorithms, including filtered back-projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at a level of 50% (ASiR-V50%), and DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) levels. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge rise distance (ERD) within aorta root and coronary arteries were calculated. The IQ was subjectively evaluated by using a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

Compared with FBP, ASiR-V50% and DLIR-M, DLIR-H led to the lowest noise (Group A: 24.7 ± 5.0HU; Group B, 21.6 ± 2.8 HU), highest SNR (Group A, 24.9 ± 5.0; Group B, 28.0 ± 5.8), CNR (Group A, 42.2 ± 15.2; Group B, 43.6 ± 10.5) and lowest ERD (Group A, 1.49 ± 0.30 mm; Group B, 1.50 ± 0.22 mm) with statistical significance (all P < 0.05). For the objective assessment, the percentages of 4 and 5 IQ scores were significantly higher for DLIR-H (Group A, 93.8%; Group B,90.0%) and DLIR-M (Group A, 85.6%; Group B,86.9 %) compared to ASiR-V50% (Group A, 58.8%; Group B, 58.8%) and FBP (Group A, 34.4%; Group B, 33.1%) algorithms (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application of DLIR significantly improves both objective and subjective IQ in low tube voltage CCTA compared with ASiR-V and FBP, which may promote a further radiation dose reduction in CCTA.

PULMONARY NODULE DETECTION IN CHEST CT USING A DEEP LEARNING-BASED RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM

This study's aim was to assess whether deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) techniques are non-inferior to ASIR-V for the clinical task of pulmonary nodule detection in chest computed tomography. Up to 6 (range 3-6, mean 4.2) artificial lung nodules (diameter: 3, 5, 8 mm; density: -800, -630, +100 HU) were inserted at different locations in the Kyoto Kagaku Lungman phantom. In total, 16 configurations (10 abnormal, 6 normal) were scanned at 7.6, 3, 1.6 and 0.38 mGy CTDIvol (respectively 0, 60, 80 and 95% dose reduction). Images were reconstructed using 50% ASIR-V and a deep learning-based algorithm with low (DL-L), medium (DL-M) and high (DL-H) strength. Four chest radiologists evaluated 256 series by locating and scoring nodules on a five-point scale. No statistically significant difference was found among the reconstruction algorithms (p = 0.987, average across readers AUC: 0.555, 0.561, 0.557, 0.558 for ASIR-V, DL-L, DL-M, DL-H).

Deep Learning-based Reconstruction for Lower-Dose Pediatric CT: Technical Principles, Image Characteristics, and Clinical Implementations

Optimizing the CT acquisition parameters to obtain diagnostic image quality at the lowest possible radiation dose is crucial in the radiosensitive pediatric population. The image quality of low-dose CT can be severely degraded by increased image noise with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques partially resolve the trade-off relationship between noise and radiation dose but still suffer from degraded noise texture and low-contrast detectability at considerably low-dose settings. Furthermore, sophisticated model-based IR usually requires a long reconstruction time, which restricts its clinical usability. With recent advances in artificial intelligence technology, deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced to overcome the limitations of the FBP and IR approaches and is currently available clinically. DLR incorporates convolutional neural networks-which comprise multiple layers of mathematical equations-into the image reconstruction process to reduce image noise, improve spatial resolution, and preserve preferable noise texture in the CT images. For DLR development, numerous network parameters are iteratively optimized through an extensive learning process to discriminate true attenuation from noise by using low-dose training and high-dose teaching image data. After rigorous validations of network generalizability, the DLR engine can be used to generate high-quality images from low-dose projection data in a short reconstruction time in a clinical environment. Application of the DLR technique allows substantial dose reduction in pediatric CT performed for various clinical indications while preserving the diagnostic image quality. The authors present an overview of the basic concept, technical principles, and image characteristics of DLR and its clinical feasibility for low-dose pediatric CT. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Advances in deep learning for computed tomography denoising

Computed tomography (CT) has seen a rapid increase in use in recent years. Radiation from CT accounts for a significant proportion of total medical radiation. However, given the known harmful impact of radiation exposure to the human body, the excessive use of CT in medical environments raises concerns. Concerns over increasing CT use and its associated radiation burden have prompted efforts to reduce radiation dose during the procedure. Therefore, low-dose CT has attracted major attention in the radiology, since CT-associated x-ray radiation carries health risks for patients. The reduction of the CT radiation dose, however, compromises the signal-to-noise ratio, which affects image quality and diagnostic performance. Therefore, several denoising methods have been developed and applied to image processing technologies with the goal of reducing image noise. Recently, deep learning applications that improve image quality by reducing the noise and artifacts have become commercially available for diagnostic imaging. Deep learning image reconstruction shows great potential as an advanced reconstruction method to improve the quality of clinical CT images. These improvements can provide significant benefit to patients regardless of their disease, and further advances are expected in the near future.

Comparison of two deep learning image reconstruction algorithms in chest CT images: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) algorithms in chest computed tomography (CT) with different clinical indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acquisitions on image quality and anthropomorphic phantoms were performed at six dose levels (CTDI_vol: 10/7.5/5/2.5/1/0.5mGy) on two CT scanners equipped with two different DLR algorithms (TrueFidelity^TM and AiCE). Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP) and the lowest/intermediate/highest DLR levels (L-DLR/M-DLR/H-DLR) of each algorithm. Noise power spectrum, task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed: d' modelled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule, ground-glass opacity, or high-contrast pulmonary lesion. Subjective image quality of anthropomorphic phantom images was analyzed by two radiologists.

RESULTS

For the L-DLR/M-DLR levels, the noise magnitude was lower with TrueFidelity^TM than with AiCE from 2.5 to 10 mGy. For H-DLR, noise magnitude was lower with AiCE . For L-DLR and M-DLR, the average NPS spatial frequency (f_av) values were greater for AiCE except for 0.5 mGy. For H-DLR levels, f_av was greater for TrueFidelity^TM than for AiCE. TTF_50% values were greater with AiCE for the air insert, and lower than TrueFidelity^TM for the polyethylene insert. From 2.5 to10 mGy, d' was greater for AiCE than for TrueFidelity^TM for H-DLR for all lesions, but similar for L-DLR and M-DLR. Image quality was rated clinically appropriate for all levels of both algorithms, for dose from 2.5 to 10 mGy, except for L-DLR of AiCE.

CONCLUSION

DLR algorithms reduce the image-noise and improve lesion detectability. Their operations and properties impacted both noise-texture and spatial resolution.

Comparison of two versions of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on CT image quality and dose reduction: A phantom study

PURPOSE

To compare the impact on CT image quality and dose reduction of two versions of a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction algorithm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acquisitions on the CT ACR 464 phantom were performed at five dose levels (CTDI_vol : 10/7.5/5/2.5/1 mGy) using chest or abdomen pelvis protocol parameters. Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered-back projection (FBP), the enhanced level of AIDR 3D (AIDR 3De), and the three levels of AiCE (Mild, Standard, and Strong) for the two versions (AiCE V8 vs AiCE V10). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) for bone (high-contrast insert) and acrylic (low-contrast insert) inserts were computed. To quantify the changes of noise magnitude and texture, the square root of the area under the NPS curve and the average spatial frequency (f_av ) of the NPS curve were measured. The detectability index (d') was computed to model the detectability of either a large mass in the liver or lung, or a small calcification or high contrast tissue boundaries.

RESULTS

The noise magnitude was lower with both AiCE versions than with AIDR 3De. The noise magnitude was lower with AiCE V10 than with AiCE V8 (-4 ± 6% for Mild, -13 ± 3% for Standard, and -48 ± 0% for Strong levels). f_av and TTF_50% values for both inserts shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE than with AIDR 3De. Compared to AiCE V08, f_av shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE V10 (45 ± 4%, 36 ± 3%, and 5 ± 4% for all levels, respectively). The TTF_50% values shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE V10 as compared with AiCE V8 for both inserts, except for the Strong level for the acrylic insert. Whatever the dose and AiCE levels, d' values were higher with AiCE V10 than with AiCE V8 for the small object/calcification and for the large object/lesion.

CONCLUSION

As compared to AIDR 3De, lower noise magnitude and higher spatial resolution and detectability index were found with both versions of AiCE. As compared to AiCE V8, AiCE V10 reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture in a simple geometric phantom, except for the Strong level. AiCE V10 seems to have a greater potential for dose reduction than AiCE V8.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to enhance the image quality of abdominal CT, compared to iterative reconstruction technique.

METHOD

Pre and post-contrast abdominal CT images in 50 patients were reconstructed with 2 different algorithms: hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR: ASiR-V 50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity). Standard deviation of attenuation in normal liver parenchyma was measured as the image noise on pre and post-contrast CT. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the aorta, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver were calculated on post-contrast CT. The overall image quality was graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).

RESULTS

The image noise was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid-IR [hybrid IR, median 8.3 Hounsfield unit (HU) (interquartile range (IQR) 7.6-9.2 HU); DLIR, median 5.2 HU (IQR 4.6-5.8), P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT]. The CNR and SNR were significantly improved by DLIR [CNR, median 4.5 (IQR 3.8-5.6) vs 7.3 (IQR 6.2-8.8), P < 0.0001; SNR, median 9.4 (IQR 8.3-10.1) vs 15.0 (IQR 13.2-16.4), P < 0.0001]. The overall image quality score was also higher for DLIR compared to hybrid-IR (hybrid IR 3.1 ± 0.6 vs DLIR 4.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT).

CONCLUSIONS

Image noise, overall image quality, CNR and SNR for abdominal CT images are improved with DLIR compared to hybrid IR.