Impact of Variability in Echocardiographic Interpretation on Assessment of Adequacy of Repair Following Congenital Heart Surgery: A Pilot Study

Organisation of paediatric echocardiography laboratories and governance of echocardiography services and training in Europe: current status, disparities, and potential solutions. A survey from the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) imaging working group

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the organisation of paediatric echocardiography laboratories in Europe.

METHODS

A structured and approved questionnaire was circulated across all 95 Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology affiliated centres. The aims were to evaluate: (1) facilities in paediatric echocardiography laboratories across Europe, (2) accredited laboratories, (3) medical/paramedical staff employed, (4) time for echocardiographic studies and reporting, and (5) training, teaching, quality improvement, and research programs.

RESULTS

Respondents from forty-three centres (45%) in 22 countries completed the survey. Thirty-six centres (84%) have a dedicated paediatric echocardiography laboratory, only five (12%) of which reported they were European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging accredited. The median number of echocardiography rooms was three (range 1-12), and echocardiography machines was four (range 1-12). Only half of all the centres have dedicated imaging physiologists and/or nursing staff, while the majority (79%) have specialist imaging cardiologist(s). The median (range) duration of time for a new examination was 45 (20-60) minutes, and for repeat examination was 20 (5-30) minutes. More than half of respondents (58%) have dedicated time for reporting. An organised training program was present in most centres (78%), 44% undertake quality assurance, and 79% perform research. Guidelines for performing echocardiography were available in 32 centres (74%).

CONCLUSION

Facilities, staffing levels, study times, standards in teaching/training, and quality assurance vary widely across paediatric echocardiography laboratories in Europe. Greater support and investment to facilitate improvements in staffing levels, equipment, and governance would potentially improve European paediatric echocardiography laboratories.

Echocardiographic image collection and evaluation in infants with CHD: lessons learned from the imaging core lab for the Residual Lesion Score study

Many factors affect patient outcome after congenital heart surgery, including the complexity of the heart disease, pre-operative status, patient specific factors (prematurity, nutritional status and/or presence of comorbid conditions or genetic syndromes), and post-operative residual lesions. The Residual Lesion Score is a novel tool for assessing whether specific residual cardiac lesions after surgery have a measurable impact on outcome. The goal is to understand which residual lesions can be tolerated and which should be addressed prior to leaving the operating room. The Residual Lesion Score study is a large multicentre prospective study designed to evaluate the association of Residual Lesion Score to outcomes in infants undergoing surgery for CHD. This Pediatric Heart Network and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded study prospectively enrolled 1,149 infants undergoing 5 different congenital cardiac surgical repairs at 17 surgical centres. Given the contribution of echocardiographic measurements in assigning the Residual Lesion Score, the Residual Lesion Score study made use of a centralised core lab in addition to site review of all data. The data collection plan was designed with the added goal of collecting image quality information in a way that would permit us to improve our understanding of the reproducibility, variability, and feasibility of the echocardiographic measurements being made. There were significant challenges along the way, including the coordination, de-identification, storage, and interpretation of very large quantities of imaging data. This necessitated the development of new infrastructure and technology, as well as use of novel statistical methods. The study was successfully completed, but the size and complexity of the population being studied and the data being extracted required more technologic and human resources than expected which impacted the length and cost of conducting the study. This paper outlines the process of designing and executing this complex protocol, some of the barriers to implementation and lessons to be considered in the design of future studies.

Technical performance scores associate with early prognosis of tetralogy of Fallot repair

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between technical performance scores (TPS) and the early prognosis of tetralogy of Fallot repair (TOF).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on TOF repair patients at our center from Oct 2017 to Oct 2022. Patients were classified into Class 1 (no residua), Class 2 (minor residua), or Class 3 (major residua) based on TPS derived from predischarge echocardiograms and need for reintervention. Statistical methods were used to assess the association between TPS and early prognosis.

Results

A total of 75 TOF repair patients (40% female, 60% male) were analyzed and categorized into TPS1 (24%), TPS2 (53.3%), and TPS3 (22.6%) based on pre-discharge echocardiographic findings. The median follow-up time was 7.0 months. The multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that TPS3 scores are associated with a 12.68-fold increase in risk compared to TPS1 and TPS2 scores [95% CI = 12.68 (0.9∼179.28), P = 0.06]. The Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between TPS classification and low cardiac output syndrome (r = 0.26, P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in ICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation among the groups.

Conclusion

TPS3 after intracardiac TOF repair is associated with higher risk of early re-intervention, highlighting the importance of close follow-up and monitoring in this patient population. Patients who develop low cardiac output syndrome in the early postoperative period may have residual defects that require prompt identification.

Intraoperative Technical Performance Score Predicts Outcomes After Congenital Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

The utility of the intraoperative technical performance score (IO-TPS) in predicting outcomes after congenital cardiac surgery remains unknown.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease from January 2011 to December 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative echocardiograms were used to assign IO-TPS for each index operation (class 1, no residua; class 2, minor residua; class 3, major residua). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, transplant, unplanned reintervention in the anatomic area of repair, and new permanent pacemaker implantation. Secondary outcomes included postdischarge (late) mortality or transplant and unplanned reintervention. Associations between IO-TPS and outcomes were assessed using logistic (primary) and Cox or competing risk (secondary) models, adjusting for preoperative patient- and procedure-related covariates.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was observed in 784 (11.5%) of 6793 patients who met entry criteria. On multivariable analysis, IO-TPS was a significant predictor of the primary outcome (class 2: odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.0; P < .001]; class 3: odds ratio, 6.0 [95% CI, 4.0-8.9; P < .001]). Among 6661 transplant-free survivors of hospital discharge observed for up to 10.5 years, there were 185 (2.8%) deaths or transplants and 1171 (17.6%) reinterventions. Class 3 patients had a greater adjusted risk of late mortality or transplant (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2; P = .012) and late reintervention (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.3; P < .001) vs class 1 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IO-TPS is significantly associated with adverse early and late outcomes after congenital heart surgery and may serve as an important adjunct for self-assessment and quality improvement.

The Relationship Between Pre-operative Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain and Post-operative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Arterial Switch Operation Is Age Dependent

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative length of stay (LOS) after the arterial switch operation (ASO) is variable. The association between pre-operative non-invasive measures of ventricular function and post-operative course has not been well established. The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the relationship between pre-operative non-invasive measures of ventricular function and post-operative LOS and (2) evaluate the change in ventricular function after ASO.

METHODS

Data were reviewed in consecutive ASO patients between 2010 and 2016. The primary outcome was post-operative LOS. Echocardiograms obtained during the pre-operative period and at the time of discharge were retrospectively analyzed using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Pearson's correlation between patient-specific, pre-operative, and echocardiographic data versus post-operative LOS was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included in analyses, 39 neonates and 13 infants. Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain correlated with post-operative LOS for infants age > 28 days (r = 0.62, p = 0.03), but not for neonates (r = 0.14, p = 0.40). Operative age (r = - 0.42, p = 0.003), weight at surgery (r = - 0.48, p ≤ 0.001), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (r = 0.30, p = 0.045) also correlated with post-operative LOS. Standard 2D measures of ventricular function did not correlate with post-operative LOS. LV ejection fraction and longitudinal strain worsened post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Higher pre-operative LV longitudinal strain (representing worse LV function) is associated with increased post-operative LOS after ASO in infants > 28 days, but not in neonates. LV ejection fraction and longitudinal strain worsened after ASO. Future studies should assess the utility of performing STE in risk stratifying patients prior to ASO.

Data-Driven Quality Improvement Project to Increase the Value of the Congenital Echocardiographic Report

Echocardiography is the primary diagnostic modality for congenital heart disease patients. The written report is used to communicate with the care team and organization is often divided into the body with detailed findings and the conclusions with important findings summarized. Strategies to increase workflow efficiency include batch writing of reports after performance of multiple echocardiograms and the use of report templates which may contribute to discrepancies within report leading to potential downstream medical errors. The aim of this project was to measure the rate of inconsistencies in the echocardiogram reports and through an iterative series of process improvement decrease this rate while maintaining sonographer efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. The discrepancy rate, diagnostic error rate, and sonographer productivity were collected one-year prior and during the iterative quality improvement process. The primary outcome and discrepancies in reports were determined by two reviewers: an experienced pediatric echocardiographic cardiologist and a senior sonographer. Minor discrepancies were defined as contradictions between the body and the conclusion of the report that were unlikely to affect patient care. Major discrepancies were defined as discrepancies between the body and the conclusion that had significant potential to affect patient care. Sonographer productivity was measured as studies per sonographer per month. Our primary intervention was to initiate a quarterly QI meeting and to decrease the batch writing of preliminary echocardiogram reports. No major discrepancies were identified pre- or post-intervention. The minor discrepancies decreased from 40.7 to 6%. Sonographer productivity was not significantly changed with a slight increase from 100 studies/sonographer/month during the baseline to 101 studies/sonographer/month during the intervention. There was no change in major or minor diagnostic error rate. Our quality improvement intervention increased the value of our reports by significantly decreasing minor discrepancies without negatively impacting sonographer productivity or diagnostic accuracy.

Revisiting the utility of technical performance scores following tetralogy of Fallot repair

OBJECTIVE

Although an important quality metric, current technical performance scores may not be generalizable and may omit operative factors that influence outcomes. We examined factors not included in current technical performance scores that may contribute to increased postoperative length of stay, major complications, and cost after primary repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single site study of patients younger than age 2 years with tetralogy of Fallot undergoing complete repair between 2007 and 2015. Medical record data and discharge echocardiograms were reviewed to ascertain component and composite technical performance scores. Primary outcomes included postoperative length of stay, major complications, and total hospital costs. Multivariable logistic and linear regression identified determinants of each outcome.

RESULTS

Patient population (n = 115) had a median postoperative length of stay of 8 days (interquartile range, 6-10 days), and a median total cost of $71,147. Major complications occurred in 33 patients (29%) with 1 death. Technical performance scores assigned were optimum in 28 patients (25%), adequate in 59 patients (52%), and inadequate in 26 patients (23%). Neither technical performance score components nor composite scores were associated with increased postoperative length of stay. Optimum or adequate repairs versus inadequate had equal risk of a complication (P = .79), and equivalent mean total cost ($100,000 vs $187,000; P = .25). Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time per 1-minute increase (P < .01) was associated with longer postoperative length of stay and reintervention (P = .02). The need to return to bypass also increased total cost (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Current tetralogy of Fallot technical performance scores were not associated with selected outcomes in our postoperative population. Although returning to bypass and bypass length are not included as components in the current score, these are important factors influencing complications and resource use in our population. Revisions anticipated from a prospective trial should consider including these variables.