Comparative Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children: Racial Disparity May Begin Early in Childhood

The Child Opportunity Index 2.0 and Disparities in Pediatric Cardiorespiratory Fitness

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of neighborhood-level characteristics on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) via peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) for healthy pediatric patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The institutional cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) database was analyzed retrospectively. All patients aged ≤ 18 years without a diagnosis of cardiac disease and with a maximal effort CPET were included. Patients were divided into three self-identified racial categories: White, Black, and Latinx. The Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0 was used to analyze social determinants of health. CRF was evaluated based on COI quintiles and race. Assessment of the effect of COI on racial disparities in CRF was performed using ANCOVA.

RESULTS

A total of 1753 CPETs met inclusion criteria. The mean VO2peak was 42.1 ± 9.8 mL/kg/min. The VO2peak increased from 39.1 ± 9.6 mL/kg/min for patients in the very low opportunity cohort to 43.9 ± 9.4 mL/kg/min for patients in the very high opportunity cohort. White patients had higher percent predicted VO2peak compared with both Black and Latinx patients (P < .01 for both comparisons). The racial differences in CRF were no longer significant when adjusting for COI.

CONCLUSION

In a large pediatric cohort, COI was associated with CRF. Racial disparities in CRF are reduced when accounting for modifiable risk factors.

Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in the lens of social justice - Reporting on the disparities that exist

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), heavily influenced by physical activity (PA), represents a strong and independent risk factor for a wide range of health conditions, most notably, cardiovascular disease. Substantial disparities in CRF have been identified between white and non-white populations. These disparities may partly account for group differences in susceptibility to poor health outcomes, including non-communicable disease. Race and ethnic differences in CRF may partly be explained by social injustices rooted in persistent structural and systemic racism. These forces contribute to environments that are unsupportive for opportunities to achieve optimal CRF levels. This review aims to examine, through the lens of social justice, the inequities in key social ecological factors, including socioeconomic status, the built environment, and structural racism, that underly the systemic differences in CRF and PA in vulnerable communities. Further, this review highlights current public health initiatives, as well as opportunities in future research, to address inequities and enhance CRF through the promotion of regular PA.

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Pediatric Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction

OBJECTIVE

To determine if socioeconomic status (SES) has a greater effect than standard demographic values on predicted peak oxygen consumption (pVO2).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) data from 2010 to 2020 for healthy patients age <19 years with body mass index (BMI) percentile (BMI%) between 5-95. Data were sorted by self-identified race, BMI%, and adjusted gross income (AGI); AGI served as a surrogate for SES. Mean percent predicted pVO2 (pppVO2) was compared between groups. Linear regression was used to adjust for differences.

RESULTS

A total of 541 CPETs met inclusion criteria. Mean pppVO2 was 97% ± 22.6 predicted (P < .01) with 30% below criterion standard for normal (85% predicted). After excluding unknown AGI and race, 418 CPETs remained. Mean pppVO2 was lower for Blacks (n = 36) and Latinx (n = 26) compared with Whites (n = 333, P < .01). Mean pppVO2 declined as AGI decreased (P < .01). The differences in pppVO2 between racial categories remained significant when adjusted for BMI% (Black r = -7.3, P = .035; Latinx r = -15.4, P < .01). These differences both decreased in magnitude and were no longer significant when adjusted for AGI (Black r = -6.0, P = .150; Latinx r = -9.3, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower SES correlates with lower measured cardiovascular fitness and may confound data interpretation. When using normative reference ranges in clinical decision making, providers should recognize that social determinants of health may influence predicted fitness. Social inequities should be considered when assessing pediatric cardiovascular fitness.

Every child with congenital heart disease should be exercising

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Historically, children with congenital heart disease have been restricted from exercise, contributing to a sedentary lifestyle as well as increased cardiovascular risk factors. Given the large benefits and small risks of exercise in this population, guidelines have recently shifted towards exercise promotion. However, these recommendations have yet not gained traction and children with congenital heart disease continue to live sedentary lives. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature on exercise and exercise promotion in this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

New literature reinforces the importance of recommending exercise and improving exercise capacity both in congenital heart disease in general and for specific lesions. Exercise recommendations should be individualized based on functional parameters using a structured methodology to approach the evaluation, risk classification, and prescriptions of exercise and physical activity.

SUMMARY

Regular exercise is essential for children with congenital heart disease and providers must take an active role in providing exercise recommendations for their patients. Exercise promotion remains a challenge, necessitating novel approaches to promote exercise. Further studies are needed to improve the risk stratification of patients with congenital heart disease, assess the long-term outcomes of specific exercise interventions, and inform individualized recommendations to encourage children with congenital heart disease to safely engage in exercise and establish healthy lifelong habits that will decrease their cardiovascular risk.

Are the current evaluation tools for advanced therapies biased?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite attention to racial disparities in outcomes for heart failure (HF) and other chronic diseases, progress against these inequities has been gradual at best. The disparities of COVID-19 and police brutality have highlighted the pervasiveness of systemic racism in health outcomes. Whether racial bias impacts patient access to advanced HF therapies is unclear.

RECENT FINDINGS

As documented in other settings, racial bias appears to operate in HF providers' consideration of patients for advanced therapy. Multiple medical and psychosocial elements of the evaluation process are particularly vulnerable to bias.

SUMMARY

Reducing gaps in access to advanced therapies will require commitments at multiple levels to reduce barriers to healthcare access, standardize clinical operations, research the determinants of patient success and increase diversity among providers and researchers. Progress is achievable but likely requires as disruptive and investment of immense resources as in the battle against COVID-19.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Youth: An Important Marker of Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) refers to the capacity of the circulatory and respiratory systems to supply oxygen to skeletal muscle mitochondria for energy production needed during physical activity. CRF is an important marker of physical and mental health and academic achievement in youth. However, only 40% of US youth are currently believed to have healthy CRF. In this statement, we review the physiological principles that determine CRF, the tools that are available to assess CRF, the modifiable and nonmodifiable factors influencing CRF, the association of CRF with markers of health in otherwise healthy youth, and the temporal trends in CRF both in the United States and internationally. Development of a cost-effective CRF measurement process that could readily be incorporated into office visits and in field settings to screen all youth periodically could help identify those at increased risk.