Hemodynamic Impact of Atrial Pacing in Patients with Fontan Physiology and Junctional Rhythm: A Cardiac Catheterization Study

Fontan Junctional Rhythm-Innocent Bystander or Silent Killer?

This Viewpoint discusses the impact of sinus node dysfunction and escape junctional rhythm associated with the Fontan procedure on patient outcomes.

Impact of Atrial Pacing in Fontan Patients with Junctional Rhythm: A Prospective Echocardiographic Study

Sinus node dysfunction (SND) with junctional rhythm (JR) is common after the Fontan operation. Atrial pacing (AP) restores atrioventricular (AV) synchrony, but the placement of a pacemaker carries significant morbidity. To study the impact of AP on echocardiographic parameters of function in Fontan patients with SND and JR. Nine Fontan patients with AP for SND and JR were prospectively studied with echocardiography in the following conditions-baseline paced rhythm, underlying JR and, if possible, slow-paced rhythm below their baseline paced rate (~ 10 bpm faster than their JR rate). Cardiac index was significantly lower in JR (3 ± 1.1 L/min/m2) vs AP (4.2 ± 1.4 L/min/m2; p = 0.002). Diastolic function also significantly worsened with increased ratio of early diastolic systemic AV valve inflow velocity to early diastolic systemic AV valve annulus velocity (E/e' ratio) by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in JR (11.6 ± 4.6) vs AP (8.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.016). Pulmonary venous flow reversal was present in 7/9 patients in JR vs 0/9 in AP (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in these echocardiographic measurements between the paced and slow-paced conditions. When compared to AP, JR was associated with a significant reduction in cardiac output and diastolic function, and an increased prevalence of pulmonary vein flow reversal. There were no differences between paced and slow-paced conditions, suggesting that AV synchrony rather than heart rate was primarily contributing to cardiac output. Further studies are needed to understand the chronic impact of JR on Fontan outcomes.

Management of Junctional Rhythm in Patients After the Fontan Operation: A Multicenter Congenital Cardiology Survey

Sinus node dysfunction with concomitant junctional rhythm (JR) is frequently observed among Fontan patients and has been recognized as a contributor to heart failure. The impact and management of JR is unclear. A survey was mailed to all members of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology society (PACES) and members were asked to forward the questionnaire to their non-electrophysiology colleagues. Responses were received from 154 physicians (88 electrophysiologists (EP's) and 66 non-EP's (46 pediatric cardiologists and 20 adult congenital cardiologists). There were few differences in the response between EP's and non-EP's. Overall, 57% recommended an annual ambulatory ECG (AECG). A significant majority (80%) opted to continue to follow patients with significant periods of JR on AECG as long as the patients were asymptomatic, and showed no echocardiographic signs of cardiac decompensation. However, 84% would place a pacemaker in a patient with JR who was having open chest surgery for other reasons. Finally, pacemaker placement would be performed by 91% if a patient with JR showed signs of heart failure. Most congenital cardiologists would not recommend pacemaker placement in asymptomatic Fontan patients with JR. Further studies are needed on the Fontan population to determine the impact of SND and JR on longer term outcomes and to determine the role and optimal timing of pacemaker placement in these patients.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in the Fontan Patient

As a result of remarkable progress in operative techniques and cardiology care during childhood, Fontan patients continue to age and require team-based multidisciplinary expertise to manage complications encountered in adulthood. They face particular challenges in terms of altered hemodynamic stressors, cardiac and hepatic failure, and arrhythmias. Arrhythmias in Fontan patients are highly prevalent and associated with underlying anatomy, surgical technique, and postoperative sequelae. Diagnostic tools, treatments, and device strategies for arrhythmias in Fontan patients should be adapted to the specific anatomy, type of surgical repair, and clinical status. Great strides in our understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, options and techniques to obtain access to relevant cardiac structures, and application of both old and new technologies have contributed to improving cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapies for this unique population. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the various arrhythmias encountered in Fontan patients, their diagnosis, and options for treatment and prevention, with a focus on CIEDs. Throughout, access challenges particular to the Fontan circulation are considered. Recently developed technologies, such as the sub-cutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carry the potential to be transformative but require awareness of Fontan-specific issues. Moreover, new leadless pacing technology represents a promising strategy that may soon become applicable to Fontan patients with sinus node dysfunction. CIEDs are essential tools in managing Fontan patients but the complex clinical scenarios that arise in this patient population are among the most challenging for the congenital electrophysiologist.