A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging

Neonatal Anthropometric Measurements: A Comparison of Neonates With 3-T Fetal MRI Exposure, With 1.5-T Fetal MRI Exposure, and Without In-Utero MRI Exposure

Background: Fetal MRI is increasingly performed at 3 T. Nonetheless, safety concerns persist regarding potential increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction from in-utero 3-T MRI exposure. Objective: To compare neonatal anthropometric measurements between newborns who underwent 3-T fetal MRI, newborns who underwent 1.5-T fetal MRI, and newborns without in utero MRI exposure. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included gravid patients who underwent fetal ultrasound and possible 1.5-T or 3-T fetal MRI within 10 days from January 2017 to January 2022. For each included patient who also underwent 3-T fetal MRI, one matched patient who also underwent 1.5-T MRI and two matched patients without in-utero MRI exposure, were randomly selected. Matching was based on gestational age per the fetal ultrasound. Neonatal anthropometric characteristics were compared among groups. Results: The final sample included 416 patients (mean age, 32±5 years), 104 in the 3-T MRI group, 104 in the 1.5-T MRI group, and 208 in the MRI-unexposed group. Mean gestational age at the time of fetal ultrasound used for matching was 27 weeks 2 days in the 3-T group, 25 weeks 2 days in the 1.5-T group, and 26 weeks 0 days in the MRI-unexposed group (p=.07). The distribution of indications for fetal MRI was not significantly different between the 3-T and 1.5-T groups (p=.62). Mean gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks 5 days in the 3-T group, 38 weeks 0 day in the 1.5-T group, and 38 weeks 2 days in the unexposed group (p=.51). No significant difference (p=.09) was observed among groups in mean neonatal weight (3-T: 3120±753 g; 1.5-T: 3104±704 g; unexposed: 2967±614 g); neonatal weight percentile (3-T: 45±27; 1.5-T: 42±26; MRI: 41±24); neonatal head circumference (3-T: 34±3 cm; 1.5-T: 34±3 cm; unexposed: 34±2 cm), or neonatal head circumference percentile (3-T: 48±29; 1.5-T: 42±23; unexposed: 43±30). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in neonatal anthropometric measurements among newborns who underwent in-utero 3-T MRI, newborns who underwent in-utero 1.5-T MRI, and newborns without in-utero MRI exposure. Clinical Impact: The results support the safety of 3-T MRI with respect to growth of the developing fetus.

Antenatal screening for fetal structural anomalies - Routine or targeted practice?

Antenatal screening with ultrasound identifies fetal structural anomalies in 3-6% of pregnancies. Identification of anomalies during pregnancy provides an opportunity for counselling, targeted imaging, genetic testing, fetal intervention and delivery planning. Ultrasound is the primary modality for imaging the fetus in pregnancy, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is evolving as an adjunctive tool providing additional structural and functional information. Screening should start from the first trimester when more than 50% of severe defects can be detected. The mid-trimester ultrasound balances the benefits of increased fetal growth and development to improve detection rates, whilst still providing timely management options. A routine third trimester ultrasound may detect acquired anomalies or those missed earlier in pregnancy but may not be available in all settings. Targeted imaging by fetal medicine experts improves detection in high-risk pregnancies or when an anomaly has been detected, allowing accurate phenotyping, access to advanced genetic testing and expert counselling.

How to Perform Fetal MR Imaging

This article provides the readers with practical guidance on how to perform fetal MR imaging, including technical considerations such as scanner field strength and use of appropriate radiofrequency receive coils, and summarizes the role, strengths, and limitations of the various MR imaging sequences. The authors review the various factors to consider in scan preparation, including study indication, timing, maternal preparation, and the creation of an institutional fetal imaging protocol. Additional factors that go into scan optimization during acquisition including prioritizing maternal comfort and ways to troubleshoot various artifacts that maybe encountered in fetal imaging are discussed.

Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pregnancy

Magnetic resonance imaging is being increasingly used to diagnose and follow up a variety of medical conditions in pregnancy, both for maternal and fetal indications. However, limited data regarding its safe use in pregnancy may be a source of anxiety and avoidance for both patients and their healthcare providers. In this review, we critically discuss the main safety concerns of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in pregnancy including energy deposition, acoustic noise, and use of contrast agents, supported by data from animal and human studies. Use of maternal sedatives and concerns related to occupational exposure in pregnant personnel are also addressed. Exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents and sedation for MRI during pregnancy should be avoided whenever feasible.

Effect of magnet strength on fetal brain biometry - a single-center retrospective MRI-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Abnormal fetal brain measurements might affect clinical management and parental counseling. The effect of between-field-strength differences was not evaluated in quantitative fetal brain imaging until now. Our study aimed to compare fetal brain biometry measurements in 3.0 T with 1.5 T scanners.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 1150 low-risk fetuses scanned between 2012 and 2021, with apparently normal brain anatomy, were retrospectively evaluated for biometric measurements. The cohort included 1.5 T (442 fetuses) and 3.0 T scans (708 fetuses) of populations with comparable characteristics in the same tertiary medical center. Manually measured biometry included bi-parietal, fronto-occipital and trans-cerebellar diameters, length of the corpus-callosum, vermis height, and width. Measurements were then converted to centiles based on previously reported biometric reference charts. The 1.5 T centiles were compared with the 3.0 T centiles.

RESULTS

No significant differences between centiles of bi-parietal diameter, trans-cerebellar diameter, or length of the corpus callosum between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners were found. Small absolute differences were found in the vermis height, with higher centiles in the 3.0 T, compared to the 1.5 T scanner (54.6th-centile, vs. 39.0th-centile, p < 0.001); less significant differences were found in vermis width centiles (46.9th-centile vs. 37.5th-centile, p = 0.03). Fronto-occipital diameter was higher in 1.5 T than in the 3.0 T scanner (66.0th-centile vs. 61.8th-centile, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing use of 3.0 T MRI for fetal imaging poses a potential bias when using 1.5 T-based charts. We elucidate those biometric measurements are comparable, with relatively small between-field-strength differences, when using manual biometric measurements. Small inter-magnet differences can be related to higher spatial resolution with 3 T scanners and may be substantial when evaluating small brain structures, such as the vermis.

Effects of 1.5-T versus 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses: is there a difference in postnatal neurodevelopmental outcome? Evaluation in a fetal population with left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

BACKGROUND

The utilization of 3-T magnetic field strength in obstetric imaging is increasingly common. It is important to ensure that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with higher magnetic field strength is safe for the fetus. Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates undergoing prenatal MR imaging with 1.5-T versus 3-T is of interest but has not yet been examined.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized no clinically meaningful difference in neurodevelopmental outcome between fetuses undergoing 1.5-T versus 3-T fetal MR imaging. As imaging a normal fetus for research purposes is illegal in Pennsylvania, this study was conducted in a population of fetuses with left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (left-CDH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of neurodevelopmental outcome of fetuses with left-CDH scanned at 1.5-T (n=75) versus 3-T (n=25) magnetic field strength between July of 2012 and December of 2019 was performed. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III).

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in median age of assessment (1.5-T: 18 [12, 25] versus 3-T: 21 [11, 26], P=0.79), in mean BSID-III cognitive (1.5-T: 91 ± 14 versus 3-T: 90 ± 16, P=0.82), language (1.5-T: 92 ± 20 versus 3-T: 91 ± 20, P=0.91), and motor composite (1.5-T: 89 ± 15 versus 3-T: 87 ± 18, P=0.59) scores, subscales scores (for all, P>0.50), or in risk of abnormal neuromuscular exam (P=0.29) between neonates with left-CDH undergoing a 1.5-T versus 3-T MR imaging during fetal life. Additionally, the distribution of patients with average, mildly delayed, and severely delayed BSID-III scores was similar between the two groups (for all, P>0.50). The overall distribution of the composite scores in this CDH population was similar to the general population independent of exposure to 1.5-T or 3-T fetal MR imaging. Two 3-T patients (8%) and five 1.5-T patients (7%) scored within the significant delayed range for all BSID-III domains. Subjects with lower observed-to-expected fetal lung volume (O/E FLV) and postnatal need for ECMO had lower cognitive, language, motor, and subscales scores (for all, P<0.03) regardless of being imaged at 1.5-T versus 3-T.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that, compared to 1.5-T MR imaging, fetal exposure to 3-T MR imaging does not increase the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment in fetuses with left-CDH. Additional MR imaging studies in larger CDH cohorts and other fetal populations are needed to replicate and extend the present findings.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla - the European experience

BACKGROUND

The Fetal Imaging Taskforce was established in 2018 by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology. The first survey on European practice of fetal imaging published in 2020 revealed that 30% of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed at 3 tesla (T). The purpose of this second survey was to identify the impact of 3-T fetal MRI with an emphasis on image quality, diagnostic yield, and technical challenges and artifacts at higher field strengths.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prenatal imaging practice at 3-T MRI units in various centres in Europe and to prepare recommendations on behalf of the Fetal Imaging Taskforce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was sent to all members performing 3-T fetal MRI. Questions included practitioner experience, magnet brand, protocols, counselling, artifacts and benefits of imaging at higher field strengths.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven centres replied and reported improved spatial resolution and improved signal-to-noise ratio when performing fetal MRI at 3 T. Shading and banding artifacts and susceptibility to motion artifacts were common problems identified by practitioners at the higher field strength. For all neurological indications, practitioners reported a benefit of imaging at 3 T, most marked for posterior fossa evaluation and parenchymal lesions.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3-T magnets in fetal MRI has improved the availability and quality of advanced imaging sequences and allowed for better anatomical evaluation. There remain significant challenges to minimize the impact of artifacts on image quality. This paper includes guidelines for clinical practice and imaging at 3 T.

3.0 Tesla normative diffusivity in 3rd trimester fetal brain

PURPOSE

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the developing fetus provide valuable information on the diagnosis and prognosis of prenatal brain pathologies. Normative ADC data has been previously established in 1.5 T MR scanners but lacking in 3.0 T scanners. Our objective was to measure ADC values in various brain areas in a cohort of normal singleton fetuses scanned in a 3.0 T MR scanner.

METHODS

DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) was performed in 47 singleton fetuses with normal or questionably abnormal results on sonography followed by normal structural MR imaging. ADC values were measured in cerebral lobes (frontal, parietal, temporal lobes), basal ganglia, and pons. Regression analysis was used to examine gestational age-related changes in regional ADC.

RESULTS

Median gestational age was 30.1 weeks (range, 26-34 weeks). There was a significant effect of region on ADC values, whereby ADC values were highest in cerebral lobes (parietal > frontal > temporal lobes), compared with basal ganglia. The lowest values were found in the pons. On regression analysis, there was a decrease in ADC values in basal ganglia and pons with increasing gestational age. ADC values in frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes were stable in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Regional brain ADC values in 3.0 T scanners are comparable with previously reported values in 1.5 T scanners, with similar changes over gestational age. Using 3.0 T scanners is increasing worldwide. For fetal imaging, establishing normal ADC values is critical as DWI enables a sensitive and quantitative technique to evaluate normal and abnormal brain development.

Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of Fetal Spine Anomalies with Postnatal Correlation

Congenital anomalies of the spine are associated with substantial morbidity in the perinatal period and may affect the rest of the patient's life. Accurate early diagnosis of spinal abnormalities during fetal imaging allows prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal treatment planning, which can substantially affect functional outcomes. The most common and clinically relevant congenital anomalies of the spine fall into three broad categories: spinal dysraphism, segmentation and fusion anomalies of the vertebral column, and sacrococcygeal teratomas. Spinal dysraphism is further categorized into one of two subtypes: open spinal dysraphism and closed spinal dysraphism. The latter category is further subdivided into those with and without subcutaneous masses. Open spinal dysraphism is an emergency and must be closed at birth because of the risk of infection. In utero closure is also offered at some fetal centers. Sacrococcygeal teratomas are the most common fetal pelvic masses and the prognosis is variable. Finally, vertebral body anomalies are categorized into formation (butterfly and hemivertebrae) and segmentation (block vertebrae) anomalies. Although appropriate evaluation of the fetal spine begins with US, which is the initial screening modality of choice, MRI is increasingly important as a problem-solving tool, especially given the recent advances in fetal MRI, its availability, and the complexity of fetal interventions. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Utilization of 3-T fetal magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

As the safety and efficacy of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 tesla (T) continues to evolve, understanding its potential benefits and limitations is becoming increasingly important.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare the image quality of fetal MRI between 1.5 T and 3 T in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fetal MRIs performed at 3 T between Jan. 1, 2019, and Dec. 31, 2019, at our institution were retrospectively reviewed by four fellowship-trained subspecialty radiologists. Imaging quality by system, sequence and artifacts were compared with matched controls at 1.5 T and rated using a modified Likert scale.

RESULTS

Thirty-three fetal MRIs at 3 T were reviewed, and a control group of studies for the same clinical indication and equivalent gestational age were selected for comparison. Two of the four radiologists preferred 3-T image quality of the brain with slight agreement among the four reviewers (k=0.19, P=0.01). Three of the four radiologists had no preference for 1.5 T vs. 3 T in the majority of cases in evaluating the chest and abdomen. In the overall assessment, 3 T was preferred in less than half of cases by all four radiologists (k=0.07, P=0.26). In the evaluation of standing wave, moire fringe and magnetic susceptibility artifacts, 3 T was not preferred in the majority of studies by all four radiologists. Total exam time was significantly longer in the 3-T fetal MRIs (75.0±15.1 min) compared to the 1.5-T fetal MRIs (55.5±13.3 min, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

While 3 T is a feasible alternative to 1.5 T for fetal MRI, the increased artifacts and longer exam times observed at 3 T without clear improvement in overall image quality make 1.5 T preferable for fetal MRI in routine clinical practice.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Recommendations for the Safe Use of MRI During Pregnancy

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during pregnancy is associated with concerns among patients and health professionals with regards to fetal safety. In this work, the Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Working Group on MRI in Pregnancy presents recommendations for the use of MRI in pregnancy, derived from literature review as well as expert panel opinions and discussions. The working group, which consists of academic subspecialty radiologists and obstetrician-gynaecologists, aimed to provide updated, evidence-based recommendations addressing safety domains related to energy deposition, acoustic noise, and gadolinium-based contrast agent use based on magnetic field strength (1.5T and 3T) and trimester scanned, in addition to the effects of sedative use and occupational exposure.

Survey about the current use of fetal MRI in Spain

In June 2019 in Seville, at the first course in fetal MRI, endorsed by the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM) and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Radiology (SERPE), the Spanish fetal MRI group was founded. To establish this group, a questionnaire was designed for radiologists dedicated to prenatal imaging in Spain and disseminated to the SERAM's members. The questions were related to the type of hospital, to MRI studies (magnetic field, gestational age, use of sedation, number of studies per year, proportion of fetal neuroimaging studies), and to teaching and research about fetal MRI. A total of 41 responses were received from radiologists in 25 provinces (88% working in public hospitals). Very few radiologists in Spain perform prenatal ultrasonography (7%) or prenatal CT. MRI is done in the second trimester (34%) or in the third trimester (44%). In 95% of centers, fetal brain MRI studies predominate. In 41% of the centers, studies can be done on 3 T MRI scanners. Maternal sedation is used in 17% of centers. The number of fetal MRI studies per year varies widely, being much higher in Barcelona and Madrid than in the rest of Spain.

European overview of current practice of fetal imaging by pediatric radiologists: a new task force is launched

A new task force dedicated to prenatal imaging was created in 2018 by the European Society of Pediatric Radiology. In order to establish a network of European prenatal imaging practice, we sent a questionnaire to radiologists practicing prenatal imaging in Europe. The questions were related to the type of institution, the local legislation for termination of pregnancy, the type of imaging modality and the following items regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): magnetic field, gestational age at which it is performed, use of maternal sedation, number of examinations per year, proportion of cerebral versus body indications and proportion of repeated examinations. We collected responses from 20 European countries, 52 cities and 67 institutions (82% public). In most countries, the upper gestational age limit for termination of pregnancy is 24 weeks of gestation. In some countries, it is earlier and in other countries, there is no limit. Very few radiologists practice fetal ultrasonography and computed tomography. In some countries, fetal MRI is mainly performed before 24 weeks of pregnancy, while in others, it is mainly performed in the third trimester. Neurological indications are by far predominant and 30% of the institutions have access to a 3-tesla (T) unit for fetal MRI. Maternal sedation is rarely used. The number of scans per year is highly variable with an average of 140, which is not necessarily correlated to the size of the population.

MRI safety considerations during pregnancy

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during pregnancy is on the rise due its ability to provide detailed cross-sectional anatomy without ionizing radiation. Despite the favorable radiation profile, theoretically concerns regarding the safety of MRI and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration have been raised. Currently there are no studies that have shown any attributable harms of MRI during any trimester of pregnancy although prospective and longitudinal studies are lacking. GBCA administration may be associated with a slightly higher rate of neonatal death, although this is based on a single, large cohort study. Understanding the available evidence regarding MRI safety during pregnancy in the context of current society guidelines will help the radiologist serve as a valuable resource to patients and referring providers.