Measuring compressibility in the optima AUC™ analytical ultracentrifuge

Adsorption of Au(III), Pt(IV), Pd(II), and Rh(III) ions on activated carbon in a batch reactor supported by microwave radiation

This study investigates the simultaneous recovery of noble metal ions using commercially available activated carbon (AC). Adsorption was carried out in a closed batch reactor enhanced by microwave radiation, creating high-pressure and high-temperature conditions. The effects of AC mass, process time, temperature, pH, and ionic strength of the solution were examined. High-temperature, high-pressure, and microwave radiation proved to be effective means of chemical activation, resulting in nearly 100% adsorption efficiency. It is proposed that microwave radiation significantly increases the local temperature at the surface of activated carbon, altering the adsorption mechanism. This enhancement led to higher recovery yields compared to traditional batch reactors without microwave support. The results demonstrate the significant potential of this method for efficient metal recovery.

Reincarnation of the Analytical Ultracentrifuge: Emerging Opportunities for Nanomedicine

The analytical ultracentrifuge (AUC) and the modern field of analytical ultracentrifugation found its inception approximately a century ago. We highlight the scope of its major experimental opportunities as a transport-based method, contemporary and up-and-coming investigation potential for polymers, polymer-drug conjugates, polymer assemblies, as well as medical nanoparticles. Special focus lies on molar mass estimates of unimeric polymeric species, self-assemblies in solution, and (co)localization of multicomponent systems in solution alongside the material-biofluid interactions. We close with present challenges and incentives for future research.

Analytical ultracentrifugation: still the gold standard that offers multiple solutions

Understanding the nature of macromolecules and their interactions in solution underpins many fields, including biology, chemistry and materials science. The 24th International Analytical Ultracentrifugation Workshop and Symposium (AUC2019, held in Christchurch, New Zealand, August 2019), brought together 77 international delegates to highlight recent developments in the field. There was a focus on analytical ultracentrifugation, although we recognise that this is but one of the key methods in the biophysicist's toolkit. Many of the presentations showcased the versatility of analytical ultracentrifugation and how such experiments are integrated with other solution techniques, such as small-angle X-ray scattering, cryo-electron microscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry and more. This special issue emphasises a wide range of themes covered in the meeting, including carbohydrate chemistry, protein chemistry, polymer science, and macromolecular interactions.

Calibrating analytical ultracentrifuges

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is based on the concept of recording and analyzing macroscopic macromolecular redistribution that results from a centrifugal force acting on the mass of suspended macromolecules in solution. Since AUC rests on first principles, it can provide an absolute measurement of macromolecular mass, sedimentation and diffusion coefficients, and many other quantities, provided that the solvent density and viscosity are known, and provided that the instrument is properly calibrated. Unfortunately, a large benchmark study revealed that many instruments exhibit very significant systematic errors. This includes the magnification of the optical detection system used to determine migration distance, the measurement of sedimentation time, and the measurement of the solution temperature governing viscosity. We have previously developed reference materials, tools, and protocols to detect and correct for systematic measurement errors in the AUC by comparison with independently calibrated standards. This 'external calibration' resulted in greatly improved precision and consistency of parameters across laboratories. Here we detail the steps required for calibration of the different data dimensions in the AUC. We demonstrate the calibration of three different instruments with absorbance and interference optical detection, and use measurements of the sedimentation coefficient of NISTmAb monomer as a test of consistency. Whereas the measured uncorrected sedimentation coefficients span a wide range from 6.22 to 6.61 S, proper calibration resulted in a tenfold reduced standard deviation of sedimentation coefficients. The calibrated relative standard deviation and mean error of 0.2% and 0.07%, respectively, is comparable with statistical errors and side-by-side repeatability in a single instrument.