FDG-PET is able to detect pancreatic carcinoma in chronic pancreatitis

Overview of F18-FDG uptake patterns in retroperitoneal pathologies: imaging findings, pitfalls, and artifacts

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneum can be the origin of a wide variety of pathologic conditions and potential space for disease spread to other compartments of the abdomen and pelvis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often the initial imaging modalities to evaluate the retroperitoneal pathologies, however given the intrinsic limitations, F18-FDG PET/CT provides additional valuable metabolic information which can change the patient management and clinical outcomes. We highlight the features of retroperitoneal pathologies on F18-FDG PET/CT and the commonly encountered imaging artifacts and pitfalls. The aim of this review is to characterize primary and secondary retroperitoneal pathologies based on their metabolic features, and correlate PET findings with anatomic imaging.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal pathologies can be complex, ranging from oncologic to a spectrum of non-oncologic disorders. While crosse-sectional imaging (CT and MRI) are often the initial imaging modalities to localize and characterize pathologies, metabolic information provided by F18-FDG PET/CT can change the management and clinical outcome in many cases.

Combination of Serum CA 19-9 and Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings Can Predict Malignancy Risk in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis Presenting With Pancreatic Head Mass: A Proof-of-Concept Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory head mass of pancreas (IMP) developing in background of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is difficult to distinguish from carcinoma pancreas. We aimed to delineate natural course of IMP and predict their malignancy risk, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, clinical records of patients with CP with diagnosed pancreatic head mass were reviewed. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, endoscopic findings, and follow-up details were retrieved from prospectively maintained database. A diagnostic nomogram was developed combining serum cancer antigen 19-9 and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings to predict the risk of malignancy.

RESULTS

We identified 107 patients with pancreatic head mass with CP of whom 87 (81.3%) were IMP and 20 (18.7%) were malignant. Patients with IMP were more frequently young males with alcohol-related CP and low CA 19-9 in comparison with those with malignancy (age IMP: 41.3 ± 11.3 vs carcinoma: 49.3 ± 14.5 years [ P = 0.009]; males 89.7% vs 65% [ P = 0.011]; alcoholic etiology: 71.3% vs 20% [ P < 0.001]; median CA 19-9: 25.78 [interquartile range, 7.20-120.60] vs 1034.50 [106.65-7808.25] [ P < 0.001]). A diagnostic nomogram combining CA 19-9 and EUS findings could identify malignancy with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.905, which was better than both CA 19-9 (0.80) and EUS alone (0.826). Patients with IMP had relatively benign disease course with 40.2% biliary obstruction, 20.7% portal venous thrombosis, 14.9% gastric outlet obstruction, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival being 97.3%, 92.7%, and 92.0%, respectively. Surgery was required in only 12 patients (13.8%) with IMP.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of CA 19-9 and EUS best identifies malignancy risk in patients with IMP, who have otherwise benign course.

Design of 99mTc-labeled zinc-chelating imaging probe for SPECT imaging of the pancreas

Early and sensitive diagnosis of pancreatic diseases is a contemporary clinical challenge. Zinc level in pancreatic tissue and its secretion in pancreatic juice has long been considered a surrogate marker of pancreatic function. The objective of this study was to design a Zn-chelating imaging probe (ZCIP) which could be labeled with ^99mTc radionuclide for imaging of pancreas using single photon emission tomography (SPECT). We synthesized ZCIP as a bifunctional chelate consisting of diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid for ^99mTc-chelation at one end and bispicolylethylamine for Zn-complexation at the other end. ZCIP was labeled with ^99mTc by standard Sn²⁺-based reduction method. The ^99mTc-labeled ZCIP was studied in normal mice (0.3 mCi) for SPECT imaging. We found that ZCIP consistently labeled with ^99mTc radionuclide with over 95% efficiency. Addition of ZCIP altered the spectrum of standard dithizone-Zn complex, indicating its ability to chelate Zn. SPECT data demonstrated the ability of ^99mTc-ZCIP to image pancreas with high sensitivity in a non-invasive manner; liver and spleen were the other major organs of ^99mTc-ZCIP uptake. Based on these results, we conclude that ^99mTc-ZCIP presents as a novel radiotracer for pancreas imaging for diagnosis of diseases such as pancreatitis.

Potential use of radiolabelled neurotensin in PET imaging and therapy of patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. Neurotensin receptors are overexpressed in different malignancies, above all pancreatic cancer. On the other hand, neurotensin receptor expression in inflammation is quite low. This fact can probably solve the most important problem of F-FDG PET imaging - distinguishing malignant and inflammatory processes. The first therapeutic injection of radiolabelled neurotensin in human with pancreatic cancer has been successfully performed. Animal experiments are also very close to the first in human injection of radiolabelled neurotensin for diagnostic purposes. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of radiolabelled neurotensin analogues that can be used in imaging and therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Follicular pancreatitis: A rare pancreatic inflammatory pseudotumor

Inflammatory pseudotumors imitate neoplasms on imaging but actually represent focal inflammation. We report a case of follicular pancreatitis, which is a recently recognized distinct form of mass-forming focal chronic pancreatitis pathologically characterized by lymphoid infiltration with abundant reactive germinal centers. In our patient, follicular pancreatitis manifested as a pancreatic tail mass that was resected due to imaging findings, which were suggestive of pancreatic malignancy. We performed a literature review of this rare condition and present a summary of reported imaging findings. The most distinguishing feature from pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the enhancement pattern, as follicular pancreatitis enhances more than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma on delayed post-contrast images which is unusual for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. If this benign diagnosis is suggested on imaging, unnecessary surgery and its potential complications may be avoided.

18F-FDG PET/MR in an Atypical Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Pancreatic Tumor

MR and F-FDG PET/MR images of a 15-year-old boy with recurrent mild abdominal pain and hyperamylasemia demonstrating a pancreatic head lesion hypointense on the T1-weighted and slightly hyperintense on the T2-weighted images, with very small pseudocystic areas, restricted diffusion on the apparent diffusion coefficient map, and focal FDG uptake. No other pathologic findings such as enlarged lymph nodes, vascular invasion, metastases, dilatation of the main pancreatic duct, or pathologic uptake of the parotid glands were detected. The MR features, even if atypical, together with the focal uptake, allowed the diagnosis of pediatric solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor, which was then confirmed by histology.

Imaging in chronic pancreatitis: State of the art review

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is an important gastrointestinal cause of morbidity worldwide. It can severely impair the quality of life besides life-threatening acute and long-term complications. Pain and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (leading to malnutrition) impact the quality of life. Acute complications include pseudocysts, pancreatic ascites, and vascular complications. Long-term complications are diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer. Early diagnosis of CP is crucial to alter the natural course of the disease. However, majority of the cases are diagnosed in the advanced stage. The role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP is discussed in this review.

Efficacy of perfusion CT in differentiating of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis and characterization of isoattenuating pancreatic lesions

PURPOSE

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is routinely used in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but it may be inadequate in some cases, especially mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) and isoattenuating pancreatic lesions. Perfusion CT (pCT) may help resolve this problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pCT could help differentiating PDAC from MFCP and in characterization of isoattenuating pancreatic lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 89 cases of pancreatic lesions detected by MDCT and further analyzed with pCT. Sixty-one cases with final pathological diagnosis PDAC and 12 cases with MFCP were included from the study. Blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), mean transit time (MTT), and permeability surface area product (PS) maps were obtained. Perfusion values obtained from the lesions and normal parenchyma were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with normal parenchyma, BV, BF, PS were lower and MTT was longer in PDAC and MFCP (p < 0.05). Compared with MFCP, BV, BF, PS were lower and MTT was longer in PDAC (p < 0.001). Compared with normal parenchyma, BV, BF, PS were lower and MTT was longer in isoattenuating lesions, (p < 0.001). Cutoff values of 7.60 mL/100 mL, 64.43 mL/100 mL/min, 28.08 mL/100 mL/min for BV, BF, PS, respectively, provided 100% sensitivity and specificity and 7.47 s for MTT provided 98.3% sensitivity, 80% specificity for distinguishing PDAC from MFCP.

CONCLUSION

pCT is a useful technology that can be helpful in overcoming the limitations of routine MDCT in diagnosing PDAC and characterization of isoattenuating lesions.

PET/MR Imaging of the Pancreas

PET/MR imaging has the potential to markedly alter pancreatic care in both the malignant, and premalignant states with the ability to perform robust, high-resolution, quantitative molecular imaging. The ability of PET/MR imaging to monitor disease processes, potentially correct for motion in the upper abdomen, and provide novel biomarkers that may be a combination of MR imaging and PET biomarkers, offers a unique, precise interrogation of the pancreatic milieu going forward.

Imaging modalities in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer, primarily pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accounts for 2.4% of cancer diagnoses and 5.8% of cancer death annually. Early diagnoses can improve 5-year survival in PDAC. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy values for MRI, CT, PET&PET/CT, EUS and transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in the diagnosis of PDAC.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to identify studies reporting sensitivity, specificity and/or diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC with MRI, CT, PET, EUS or TAUS. Proportional meta-analysis was performed for each modality.

RESULTS

A total of 5399 patients, 3567 with PDAC, from 52 studies were included. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 93% (95% CI=88-96), 89% (95% CI=82-94) and 90% (95% CI=86-94) for MRI; 90% (95% CI=87-93), 87% (95% CI=79-93) and 89% (95% CI=85-93) for CT; 89% (95% CI=85-93), 70% (95% CI=54-84) and 84% (95% CI=79-89) for PET; 91% (95% CI=87-94), 86% (95% CI=81-91) and 89% (95% CI=87-92) for EUS; and 88% (95% CI=86-90), 94% (95% CI=87-98) and 91% (95% C=87-93) for TAUS.

CONCLUSION

This review concludes all modalities, except for PET, are equivalent within 95% confidence intervals for the diagnosis of PDAC.

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of incidental pancreatic lesions are being detected each year. Accurate characterisation of pancreatic lesions into benign, precancerous, and cancer masses is crucial in deciding whether to use treatment or surveillance. Distinguishing benign lesions from precancerous and cancerous lesions can prevent patients from undergoing unnecessary major surgery. Despite the importance of accurately classifying pancreatic lesions, there is no clear algorithm for management of focal pancreatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities in detecting cancerous and precancerous lesions in people with focal pancreatic lesions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index until 19 July 2016. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include studies reporting cross-sectional information on the index test (CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PET (positron emission tomography), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), EUS elastography, and EUS-guided biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration)) and reference standard (confirmation of the nature of the lesion was obtained by histopathological examination of the entire lesion by surgical excision, or histopathological examination for confirmation of precancer or cancer by biopsy and clinical follow-up of at least six months in people with negative index tests) in people with pancreatic lesions irrespective of language or publication status or whether the data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently searched the references to identify relevant studies and extracted the data. We planned to use the bivariate analysis to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) to compare the tests and assess heterogeneity, but used simpler models (such as univariate random-effects model and univariate fixed-effect model) for combining studies when appropriate because of the sparse data. We were unable to compare the diagnostic performance of the tests using formal statistical methods because of sparse data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies involving a total of 3,196 participants evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various index tests. In these 54 studies, eight different target conditions were identified with different final diagnoses constituting benign, precancerous, and cancerous lesions. None of the studies was of high methodological quality. None of the comparisons in which single studies were included was of sufficiently high methodological quality to warrant highlighting of the results. For differentiation of cancerous lesions from benign or precancerous lesions, we identified only one study per index test. The second analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous versus benign lesions, provided three tests in which meta-analysis could be performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer were: EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.00), specificity 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), specificity 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.74); PET: sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), specificity 0.65 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84). The third analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous lesions from benign lesions, only provided one test (EUS-FNA) in which meta-analysis was performed. EUS-FNA had moderate sensitivity for diagnosing precancerous or cancerous lesions (sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.00) and high specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.00), the extremely wide confidence intervals reflecting the heterogeneity between the studies). The fourth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (dysplasia) provided three tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive carcinoma were: CT: sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97); EUS: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.98); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.66 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.99), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). The fifth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) versus precancerous (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) provided six tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) were: CT: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.47 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.00); EUS-FNA carcinoembryonic antigen 200 ng/mL: sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), specificity 0.51 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81); MRI: sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86), specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.00); PET: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The sixth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided no tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The seventh analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided two tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cancer were: CT: sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) and MRI: sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95), respectively. The eighth analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) or benign lesions provided no test in which meta-analysis was performed.There were no major alterations in the subgroup analysis of cystic pancreatic focal lesions (42 studies; 2086 participants). None of the included studies evaluated EUS elastography or sequential testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to arrive at any firm conclusions because of the differences in the way that study authors classified focal pancreatic lesions into cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions; the inclusion of few studies with wide confidence intervals for each comparison; poor methodological quality in the studies; and heterogeneity in the estimates within comparisons.

Increased 18F-FDG uptake of heterotopic pancreatitis in the small intestine: A CARE-compliant case report

BACKGROUD

Heterotopic pancreas (HP), a relatively uncommon congenital anomaly, is rarely noted during F-FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan.

METHODS

A 60-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to a 10-day history of abdominal pain with elevated levels of serum amylase and lipase. Abdominal CT and ultrasound examinations were negative. In order to search for the cause, an F-FDG PET/CT whole body scan was suggested to an old woman revealing the presence of F-FDG accumulating nodule in small intestine.

RESULTS

Surgical findings and pathologic results confirmed the diagnosis of small intestinal heterotopic pancreas with active chronic inflammation.

CONCLUSION

This uncommon case underscores the necessity of considering heterotopic pancreatitis in small intestine with focal F-FDG uptake as a possible differential diagnosis in intestinal tumor and tuberculosis.

Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct, Springer link, CBM, Cnki, Wan fang and VIP databases were searched by computer before April 1, 2015 to retrieve articles on the study of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality assessment was made using the QUADAS scale. Meta-Disc 1.4 software was used to analyze the heterogeneity of the included articles, and the SROC curve was plotted to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The publication bias was assessed with Stata 12.0 software.

RESULTS: A total of 51 English-language articles were included. The summary sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in diagnosing pancreatic cancer were 87% (95%CI: 85%-89%) and 78% (95%CI: 74%-81%), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.38 (95%CI: 2.64-4.33) and 0.18 (95%CI: 0.14-0.23), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 21.91 (95%CI: 14.15-33.93), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.8930. The summary sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing pancreatic cancer were 91% (95%CI: 88%-93%) and 77% (95%CI: 72%-82%), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.57 (95%CI: 2.96-4.31) and 0.14 (95%CI: 0.11-0.18), respectively. The DOR was 28.52 (95%CI: 19.63-41.42), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.9315.

CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET have higher diagnostic value than CT in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is superior to ¹⁸F-FDG PET in terms of sensitivity and both of them can be used as diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer with negative traditional examinations.

Hybrid imaging for pancreatic malignancy: clinical applications, merits, limitations, and pitfalls

The role of PET/CT in pancreatic malignancy is evolving with new scientific evidence emerging continuously. PET/CT applications in imaging the pancreas and its organ-specific merits, limitations, and potential pitfalls are still evolving. This article provides an overview of the state-of-the-art applications of PET/CT imaging in evaluating pancreatic malignancy, comparing with conventional imaging modalities, such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Current PET/MRI is also reviewed, along with brief discussion on cost-benefit analysis.

Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.

Quantification of tumour (18) F-FDG uptake: Normalise to blood glucose or scale to liver uptake?

PURPOSE

To compare normalisation to blood glucose (BG) with scaling to hepatic uptake for quantification of tumour (18) F-FDG uptake using the brain as a surrogate for tumours.

METHODS

Standardised uptake value (SUV) was measured over the liver, cerebellum, basal ganglia, and frontal cortex in 304 patients undergoing (18) F-FDG PET/CT. The relationship between brain FDG clearance and SUV was theoretically defined.

RESULTS

Brain SUV decreased exponentially with BG, with similar constants between cerebellum, basal ganglia, and frontal cortex (0.099-0.119 mmol/l(-1)) and similar to values for tumours estimated from the literature. Liver SUV, however, correlated positively with BG. Brain-to-liver SUV ratio therefore showed an inverse correlation with BG, well-fitted with a hyperbolic function (R = 0.83), as theoretically predicted. Brain SUV normalised to BG (nSUV) displayed a nonlinear correlation with BG (R = 0.55); however, as theoretically predicted, brain nSUV/liver SUV showed almost no correlation with BG. Correction of brain SUV using BG raised to an exponential power of 0.099 mmol/l(-1) also eliminated the correlation between brain SUV and BG.

CONCLUSION

Brain SUV continues to correlate with BG after normalisation to BG. Likewise, liver SUV is unsuitable as a reference for tumour FDG uptake. Brain SUV divided by liver SUV, however, shows minimal dependence on BG.

KEY POINTS

• FDG standard uptake value in tumours helps clinicians assess response to treatment. • SUV is influenced by blood glucose; normalisation to blood glucose is recommended. • An alternative approach is to scale tumour SUV to liver SUV. • The brain used as a tumour surrogate shows that neither approach is valid. • Applying both approaches, however, appropriately corrects for blood glucose.

Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, with its incidence staying at a high level in both the United States and China. However, the overall 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is still extremely low. Surgery remains the only potential chance for long-term survival. Early diagnosis and precise staging are crucial to make proper clinical decision for surgery candidates. Despite advances in diagnostic technology such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound, diagnosis, staging and monitoring of the metabolic response remain a challenge for this devastating disease. Positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), a relatively novel modality, combines metabolic detection with anatomic information. It has been widely used in oncology and achieves good results in breast cancer, lung cancer and lymphoma. Its utilization in pancreatic cancer has also been widely accepted. However, the value of PET/CT in pancreatic disease is still controversial. Will PET/CT change the treatment strategy for potential surgery candidates? What kind of patients benefits most from this exam? In this review, we focus on the utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. In addition, its ability to monitor metabolic response and recurrence after treatment will be emphasis of discussion. We hope to provide answers to the questions above, which clinicians care most about.

Increased FDG uptake of heterotopic pancreatitis in the stomach

Heterotopic pancreas is the presence of pancreatic tissue lying outside of its normal location and lacking anatomic or vascular connections with the pancreas. Heterotopic pancreas can undergo inflammatory changes similar to the normal pancreatic gland. We present 2 rare cases showing increased (18)F-FDG uptake in the heterotopic pancreatitis of the stomachs. To our knowledge, heterotopic pancreatitis with increased tracer accumulation on FDG PET/CT has not been reported before. Heterotopic pancreas should be included in the differential diagnosis of abnormal gastric FDG accumulation along with tumor and infectious processes.

Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is among the five most lethal malignancies in the world. Unfortunately, many malignant tumors go undetected by the current primary diagnostic tools. (18)FDG-PET and (18)FDG-PET/CT might be useful to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using all major search engines. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed as well as quality of the PET-protocol. The following pooled estimates served as primary outcome measures: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included. Pooled estimates for (18)FDG-PET were: sensitivity 90%, specificity 76%, PPV 90%, NPV 76% and accuracy 86%. Pooled estimates for (18)FDG-PET/CT were: sensitivity 90%, specificity 76%, PPV 89%, NPV 78% and accuracy 86%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for (18)FDG-PET to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis were 90% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both (18)FDG-PET and (18)FDG-PET/CT offer no benefit over the current primary diagnostic tools in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, the (18)FDG-PET/CT systems are still improving. We should investigate the sensitivity and specificity of these new systems while reevaluating the tradeoff between false positive and false negative results. Yet, (18)FDG-PET/CT may have a role in the staging of pancreatic cancer, in survival prediction, and may add to other diagnostic information, like histology.

Pancreatic head cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a risk factor of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). The discovery of a pancreatic head lesion in CP frequently leads to a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) which preceded by a multidisciplinary meeting (MM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance between this indication of PD and the definitive pathological results.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2010, all patients with CP who underwent PD for suspicion of PA without any histological proof were retrospectively analyzed. The operative decision has always been made at an MM. The definitive pathological finding was retrospectively confronted with the decision made at an MM, and patients were classified in two groups according to this concordance (group 1) or not (group 2). Clinical and biological parameters were analyzed, preoperative imaging were reread, and confronted to pathological findings in order to identify predictive factors of malignant degeneration.

RESULTS

During the study period, five of 18 (group 1) patients with CP had PD were histologically confirmed to have PA, and the other 13 (group 2) did not have PA. The median age was 52.5+/-8.2 years (gender ratio 3.5). The main symptoms were pain (94.4%) and weight loss (72.2%). There was no patient's death. Six (33.3%) patients had a major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3). There was no statistical difference in clinical and biological parameters between the two groups. The rereading of imaging data could not detect efficiently all patients with PA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed the difficulty in detecting malignant transformation in patients with CP before surgery and therefore an elevated rate of unnecessary PD was found. A uniform imaging protocol is necessary to avoid PD as a less invasive treatment could be proposed.

Hepatic steatosis is associated with increased hepatic FDG uptake

OBJECTIVE

The use of liver as a reference tissue for semi-quantification of tumour FDG uptake may not be valid in hepatic steatosis (HS). Previous studies on the relation between liver FDG uptake and HS have been contradictory probably because they ignored blood glucose (BG). Because hepatocyte and blood FDG concentrations equalize, liver FDG uptake parallels BG, which must therefore be considered when studying hepatic FDG uptake. We therefore re-examined the relation between HS and liver uptake taking BG into account.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 304 patients undergoing routine PET/CT with imaging 60min post-FDG. Average standard uptake value (SUVave), maximum SUV (SUVmax) and CT density (index of HS) were measured in a liver ROI. Blood pool SUV was based on the left ventricular cavity (SUVLV). Correlations were assessed using least squares fitting of continuous data. Patients were also divided into BG subgroups (<4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-8, 8-10 and 10+mmol/l).

RESULTS

SUVave, SUVmax and SUVLV displayed similar relations with BG. SUVmax/SUVLV, but not SUVave/SUVLV, correlated significantly with BG. SUVmax, but not SUVave, correlated inversely with CT density before and after adjusting for BG. SUVmax/SUVave correlated more strongly with CT density than SUVmax. CT density correlated inversely with SUVmax/SUVLV but positively with SUVave/SUVLV.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic SUV is more influenced by BG than by HS. Its relation with BG renders it unsuitable as a reference tissue. Nevertheless, hepatic fat does correlate positively with liver SUV, although this is seen only with SUVmax because SUVave is 'diluted' by hepatic fat.

The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer continues to have a grim prognosis with 5-year survival rates at less than 5 %. It is a particularly challenging health problem given these poor survival outcomes, aggressive tumor biology, and late onset of symptoms. Most patients present with advanced unresectable cancer however, margin-negative resection provides a rare chance for cure for patients with resectable disease. The standard imaging modality for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer is contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography. Remarkable advances in CT technology have led to improvements in the ability to detect small tumors and intricate vasculature involvement by the tumor, yet CT is still restricted to providing a morphological portrait of the tumor. Diagnosis can be challenging due to similar appearance of certain benign and malignant disease. Distant metastatic disease can be silent on CT leading to improper staging, and thus management, of certain patients. Furthermore, radiation-induced fibrosis and necrosis complicate assessment of treatment response by CT alone. F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) is becoming a prevalent tool employed by physicians to improve accuracy in these clinical scenarios. Malignant transformation causes a high metabolic activity of cancer cells. 18F-FDG-PET captures this functional activity of malignancies by capturing areas with high glucose utilization rates. Imaging function rather than morphological appearance, 18F-FDG-PET has a unique role in the management of oncology patients with the ability to detect regions of tumor involvement that may be silent on conventional imaging. Literature on the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG-PET fails to reach a consensus, and improvements resulting in hybridization of 18F-FDG-PET and CT imaging techniques are preliminary. Here we review the potential role of 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in improving accuracy in the initial evaluation and subsequent steps in the management of pancreatic cancer patients.

Limited efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for differentiation between metastasis-free pancreatic cancer and mass-forming pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Differentiation between metastasis-free pancreatic cancer and mass-forming pancreatitis is important to avoid unnecessary operative procedures. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of PET/CT with F-FDG (FDG PET/CT) for the differential diagnosis between them.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FDG-PET/CT was performed in 47 study patients with pancreatic masses and without any detectable metastases, 33 of which cases were finally diagnosed as pancreatic cancer and the other 14 as pancreatitis, and the corresponding imaging data were evaluated retrospectively. The maximal SUV (SUVmax) within the masses were determined at 1 hour and mostly at 2 hours after intravenous injection of FDG.

RESULTS

SUVmax at 1 hour in pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than that in mass-forming pancreatitis, and the change in SUVmax from 1- to 2-hour time points was more consistent with pancreatic cancer than with mass-forming pancreatitis. However, there remained considerable overlapping between the SUVmax values of both diseases except either at the higher range for pancreatic cancer (> 7.7 at 1 hour or > 9.98 at 2 hours) or at the lower range for mass-forming pancreatitis (<3.37 at 1 hour or <3.53 at 2 hours). No obvious difference was found in the FDG uptake patterns of the mass areas between both diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiation between metastasis-free pancreatic cancer and mass-forming pancreatitis is difficult by FDG-PET/CT due to considerable overlapping between the SUVmax values of the two diseases, although the differential diagnosis may be possible either at the higher range of SUVmax (> 7.7 at 1 hour or > 9.98 at 2 hours) for pancreatic cancer or at the lower range of SUVmax (<3.37 at 1 hour or <3.53 at 2 hours) for mass-forming pancreatitis.

FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the potential role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis, staging and prognosis predicting of pancreatic carcinoma (PC).

METHODS: A systematic review of relevant literatures in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic and staging studies, and HRs for prognosis predicting studies were pooled. The bivariate model was used for diagnostic studies and the random-effect model for prognostic studies. Heterogeneity between included studies was tested using χ² test, and subgroup analysis was performed to explain the heterogeneities. All of the calculations were performed using Stata version 11.0.

RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included. The pooled sensitivity of PET in diagnosing PC (30 studies, 1582 patients), evaluating N stating (4 studies, 101 patients) and liver metastasis (7 studies, 316 patients) were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93), 0.64 (95%CI: 0.50-0.76), and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.52-0.79), respectively; and the corresponding specificity was 0.81 (95%CI: 0.75-0.85), 0.81 (95%CI: 0.25-0.85), and 0.96 (95%CI: 0.89-0.98), respectively. In prognosis analysis (6 studies, 198 patients), significant difference of overall survival was observed between high and low standardized uptake value groups (HR = 2.39, 95%CI: 1.57-3.63). Subgroup analysis showed that PET/CT was more sensitive than PET alone in evaluating liver metastasis of PC, 0.82 (95%CI: 0.48-0.98) and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.52-0.79), respectively.

CONCLUSION: PET can be used as a valuable diagnostic and predictive tool for PC, but its effect in the staging of PC remains indeterminate.

Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the characterization of pancreatic masses: experience from tropics

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Early detection and differentiation of malignant from benign pancreatic tumors is very essential as mass-forming pancreatitis is a frequently encountered problem. Positron emission tomography (PET) has a role in establishing the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma when the conventional imaging modalities or biopsies are nondiagnostic. In this prospective study, the utility of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the characterization of mass-forming lesions of the pancreas was reported.

METHODS

(18)F-FDG-PET/CT was prospectively performed in 87 patients diagnosed to have periampullary or pancreatic mass. Lesions with focally increased FDG uptake in PET/CT were considered malignant, whereas those with diffuse or no FDG uptake were considered benign. Semiquantitative analysis with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was also calculated. The PET/CT results were compared with histopathological results in all patients.

RESULTS

Based on the FDG uptake pattern, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for FDG-PET/CT in characterizing the periampullary and pancreatic masses into benign and malignant lesions were 93%, 90%, 95%, 87%, and 92% respectively. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the SUVmax of the lesions yielded a cut-off value of 2.8, with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 45% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FDG uptake pattern in PET/CT can differentiate malignant from benign mass-forming lesions of the pancreas with high accuracy and a discrete cut-off value of SUVmax could not be defined for the same as even lesions with pancreatic tuberculosis showed very high FDG uptake. Hence, in patients with a suspicion of malignancy in the pancreas, a focally increase FDG uptake in PET/CT suggests the diagnosis of malignancy.

PET/CT of cancer patients: part 1, pancreatic neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor prognosis despite impressive improvements in the outcomes of many other types of cancer, often because most pancreatic neoplasms are found to be unresectable at diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of pancreatic cancer and the role of modern imaging in its diagnosis and management with an emphasis on (18)F-FDG PET/CT fusion imaging.

CONCLUSION

Multimodality imaging is critical in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. PET/CT is increasingly viewed as a useful, accurate, and cost-effective modality in diagnosing and managing pancreatic cancer, but further studies are warranted. Early data suggest that contrast-enhanced PET/CT performed with modern PET/CT scanners yields high-resolution anatomic information for surgical and radiotherapeutic planning and functional information for whole-body staging in the care of patients with this disease.

State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications

Fused positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a recently developed technology that couples the functional information of PET with the anatomic details of CT. Integrated PET/CT scanners produce both PET and contrast material-enhanced CT images of the entire body in one setting. Typically, the amount of fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in normal pancreatic parenchyma is insignificant compared with that of the liver. However, both malignant (eg, adenocarcinoma) and benign (eg, acute pancreatitis) pancreatic conditions may demonstrate intense FDG uptake. PET/CT provides an opportunity to depict pancreatic tumors and distant metastases, perform preoperative staging, and monitor response to treatment, and it has proved useful in distinguishing postoperative fibrosis from recurrence. In selected cases, PET/CT findings may be used to help diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis mimicking a mass by depicting systemic involvement. PET/CT may also be used to direct biopsy to sites more likely to yield representative tumor tissue. Novel radiolabeled molecules, such as sigma-receptor ligands and 18F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-l-thymidine (FLT), may play an even greater role in distinguishing tumor recurrence from postoperative fibrosis or inflammation.

Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Accurate pre-operative imaging in pancreatic cancer helps avoid unsuccessful surgical explorations and forewarns surgeons regarding aberrant anatomy. This review aimed to determine the role of current imaging modalities in the diagnosis and determination of resectability of pancreatic and peri-ampullary adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

A systematic search of the scientific literature was carried out using EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the years 1990 to 2011 to obtain access to all publications, especially randomized controlled trials, reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) and the evaluation of resectability of pancreatic and peri-ampullary adenocarcinomas.

RESULTS

Based on 66 articles analysed in the review, MDCT and MRI/MRCP have comparable sensitivity and specificity rates for diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancers. EUS offers the best sensitivity and specificity rates for lesions <2 cm. Improved staging has been noted when PET-CT scans are added to pre-operative evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT with angiography or MRI/MRCP should constitute the first imaging modality in suspected pancreatic adenocarcinomas. EUS is recommended for assessing lesions not clearly detected, but suspected, on CT/MRI and in tumours considered 'borderline resectable' on MDCT to assess vascular involvement. PET-CT in locally advanced lesions will help rule out distant metastases.

MR imaging versus PET/CT for evaluation of pancreatic lesions

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients (15 women/12 men, mean age 56.5 years) with MR imaging and PET/CT studies performed to differentiate benign and malignant pancreatic lesions were identified between October 2008 and October 2010. Both MR and PET/CT data sets were retrospectively and blindly evaluated by two independent readers (4 readers total) with different degrees of experience, using a visual five-point score system. The results were correlated with final diagnosis obtained by histopathology.

RESULTS

17 patients had malignant diseases and 10 patients had benign diseases. Depending on the observer, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRI varied between 88-94%, 50-80%, 75-89% and 71-89% respectively. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of PET/CT were 73%, 56%, 73% and 56% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of MR for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions was 74-89%, compared with 67% for PET/CT. The weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.47 at MR and 0.53 at PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

MRI achieved higher sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

[Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis, 2010]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a benign inflammatory process, which can cause enlargement of the pancreatic head accompanied by severe pain and weight loss, and often leads to a significant reduction in quality of life (QoL). Basically, the disease is characterised by pain and functional disorders which are initially treated with conservative therapy, but in case of complications (uncontrollable pain or obstruction) surgical treatment is required.

METHODS

This article reviews the relevant literature of CP treatment, in particular randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were involved with a comparison of different surgical treatment options for the management of CP complications.

RESULTS

Recent studies have demonstrated that surgical procedures are superior to endoscopic therapy as regards long-term results of QoL and pain control. There was no significant difference found in postoperative pain relief and overall mortality when duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) of Beger and its modification (duodenum and organ-preserving pancreatic head resection [DOPPHR]) were compared with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but hospital stay, weight gain, exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, and QoL were significantly better in the DPPHR and DOPPHR groups.

CONCLUSION

DPPHR and PD seem to be equally effective in terms of postoperative pain relief and overall mortality. However, recent data suggest that DOPPHR is superior in the treatment of CP with regard to several peri- and postoperative outcome parameters and QoL. Therefore, this should be the preferable treatment option for CP complications.

Pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers

Morphology-based imaging modalities have replaced classical conventional nuclear medicine modalities for detection of liver or pancreatic lesions. With positron emission tomography and the glucose analog F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a sensitive and specific modality for the detection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic tumor deposits from hepatocellular or pancreatic cancer is available. F-18 FDG PET can increase the accuracy of staging primary tumors of the liver or the pancreas, and can be used for response monitoring. Radiopharmaceuticals such as Ga-68 DOTATOC and F-18 DOPA allow the specific detection of neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and their metastatic deposits. Hybrid scanners such as PET-CT integrate morphologic and metabolic information, and allow to increase the sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive imaging in many tumor entities. The development of specific radiopharmaceuticals and technical innovations such as SPECT-CT has increased the reliability of conventional scintigraphic imaging. This chapter focuses on the use of PET-CT in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers.

Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection

BACKGROUND

An important step in deciding the treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer is to preoperatively predict the possibility of early recurrence. We reviewed whether 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) before pancreatic cancer resection could predict tumor recurrence in the early postoperative period.

METHODS

FDG-PET/CT was performed preoperatively on 56 patients with pancreatic cancer. The maximum standardized uptake (SUV(max)) values obtained by FDG-PET/CT were compared between two groups: patients with and without recurrence within the first 6 postoperative months. SUV(max) analyses were also performed to determine whether age, sex, CA 19-9 values, the operative method, and portal vein resection were also predictive of recurrence within less than 6 months after tumor resection.

RESULTS

The median SUV(max) values of the recurrence group and no-recurrence group were 7.9 and 4.2, respectively (P = 0.0042). The SUV(max) was the only risk factor for recurrence in the first 6 postoperative months identified by multivariate analysis (P = 0.0062).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SUV(max) was higher in the recurrence group during the early postoperative period, and a high SUV(max) was a risk factor for early postoperative recurrence. Based on these results, we conclude that FDG-PET/CT is predictive of the recurrence of pancreatic cancer in the early postoperative period.

Role and limitations of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of patients with pancreatic lesions

The 18-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography coupled with computed tomography is a non invasive exploration. Several studies have shown that PET-CT has superior efficacy over conventional imaging techniques in distinguishing a benign pancreatic tumor from a malignant one. It contributes to the diagnosis of cancer in patients with a doubtful mass, much more in case of chronic pancreatitis. PET-CT is also an important help for the diagnosis of cystic tumors of the pancreas; the results can affect the management strategy. It is interesting for the endocrine tumors, particularly since the emergence of new markers. The aim of this paper is to summarize the role and limitations of 18-F-FDG PET-CT in the management of patients with pancreatic lesions (adenocarcinoma, cystic tumors, endocrine tumors, etc…) concerning the malignancy diagnosis, the detection of metastases, the monitoring after non surgical treatments and to evaluate interpretation difficulties, particularly in case of diabetes or chronic pancreatitis.

PET imaging of inflammation and adenocarcinoma xenografts using vascular adhesion protein 1 targeting peptide 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1: comparison with 18F-FDG

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate inflammation and tumour imaging with a vascular adhesion protein 1 (VAP-1) targeting peptide (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 in comparison with (18)F-FDG.

METHODS

Rats with both subcutaneous human pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts and turpentine oil-induced acute sterile inflammation were evaluated by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and by digital autoradiography of tissue cryosections. Subsequently, the autoradiographs were combined with histological and immunohistological analysis of the sections.

RESULTS

(68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 delineated acute, sterile inflammation comparable with (18)F-FDG. However, the tumour uptake of (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 was low in contrast to prominent (18)F-FDG uptake. The standardised uptake values of inflammation and tumours by PET were 1.1 +/- 0.4 (mean +/- SEM) and 0.4 +/- 0.1 for (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 2.0 +/- 0.5 and 1.6 +/- 0.8 for (18)F-FDG, respectively. In addition, PET studies showed inflammation to muscle and tumour to muscle ratios of 5.1 +/- 3.1 and 1.7 +/- 0.3 for (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 6.2 +/- 0.7 and 4.6 +/- 2.2 for (18)F-FDG, respectively. Immunohistochemistry revealed increased expression of luminal VAP-1 on the endothelium at the site of inflammation and low expression in the tumour

CONCLUSION

The (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 PET was able to visualise inflammation better than tumour, which was in accordance with the luminal expression of VAP-1 on vasculature in these experimental models.

PET and PET/CT for pancreatic malignancies

FDG PET imaging is useful for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer in whom CT fails to identify a discrete tumor mass or in whom FNAs are nondiagnostic. FDG PET imaging is useful for M staging and restaging by detecting CT occult metastatic disease, allowing noncurative resection to be avoided in this group of patients. FDG PET can differentiate post-therapy changes from recurrence and holds promise for monitoring neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The technique is less useful in periampullary carcinoma and marginally helpful in staging except for M staging. As with other malignancies, FDG PET is complementary to morphologic imaging with CT, therefore, integrated PET/CT imaging provides optimal images for interpretation and thus more optimal patient care.

Effect of hepatic steatosis on liver FDG uptake measured in mean standard uptake values

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between diffuse fatty infiltration of the liver and average fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. Consecutive nonenhanced whole-body hybrid FDG positron emission tomographic (PET)-computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained in 142 patients (mean age, 63.6 years; age range, 19-94 years) from October 1, 2008, to November 28, 2008, were retrospectively reviewed. Mean attenuation (in Hounsfield units) and standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements for the liver and spleen were obtained, with identical regions of interest used for the CT and PET examinations. The patients were assigned to three study groups: a control group-119 patients with a mean liver attenuation value greater than or equal to the mean spleen attenuation value, a diffuse fatty liver disease group-23 patients in whom the mean liver attenuation value was less than the mean spleen attenuation value, and a more strictly defined fatty liver disease group-a subset of 10 patients from the diffuse fatty liver disease group with a mean liver attenuation value minus mean spleen attenuation value difference of less than or equal to -10 HU. Mean SUV (SUV(m)) values were compared between the groups by using a two-sample t test for means. The association between mean liver attenuation and average FDG uptake was assessed with linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The average SUV(m)for the control group was 2.18 (standard deviation [SD], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 2.24). No significant difference was identified when the average SUV(m)for the control group was compared with those for the fatty liver disease (SUV(m), 2.03; SD, 0.36; 95% CI: 1.90, 2.16) (P >.05) and more strictly defined fatty liver disease (SUV(m), 2.07; SD, 0.24; 95% CI: 1.92, 2.22) groups (P >.05). Linear regression analysis of liver SUV(m)as a function of mean liver attenuation revealed a mean slope of 0.005 (SD, 0.04; 95% CI: -0.005, 0.015) and a correlation coefficient of 0.02.

CONCLUSION

No association between liver attenuation and FDG uptake measured in terms of SUV(m)was observed. On the basis of these data, it is acceptable to use the liver as a comparator for extrahepatic foci of equivocal increased FDG activity in patients with fatty liver disease. (c) RSNA, 2010.

Incidence and characteristics of chronic and lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis in patients scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The determination of the exact nature of a pancreatic head mass in a patient scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy can be very difficult. This is important as patients who suffer from benign disease such as pancreatitis do not always require surgery. The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence of pancreatitis and the signs and symptoms associated with these tumours mistaken for pancreatic cancer and the diagnostic procedures performed.

METHODS

A consecutive group of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy between 1992 and 2005 with histopathologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) and pancreatitis were analysed.

RESULTS

The incidence of pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy is 63 out of 639 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (9.9%). Of these patients, 24 patients (38%) had lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and 31 patients (49%) had focal chronic pancreatitis. Eight patients (13%) had an intermediate form with characteristics of both. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma occurred in 227 patients (36%). The presence of pancreatitis without a discrete mass on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) seemed to have clinical relevance with a positive likelihood ratio of 5.1. Mortality after resection was nil in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of pancreatitis is 9.9% for patients scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy. Of these patients, 38% had LPSP, 13% had a intermediate form and 49% had focal chronic pancreatitis. The determination of the exact nature of a pancreatic head mass remains difficult.

A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare the accuracy of combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography using F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT), multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

FDG-PET/CT imaging is increasingly used for staging of pancreatic cancer. Preliminary data suggest a significant influence of FDG-PET/CT on treatment planning, although its role is still evolving.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive patients with suspicion of pancreatic malignancy were enrolled. Patients underwent a protocol including FDG-PET/CT, MDCT, and MRI combined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, all of which were blindly evaluated. The findings were confirmed macroscopically at operation and/or by histopathologic analysis (n = 29) or follow-up (n = 9). Results of TNM classification of different imaging methods were compared with clinical TNM classification.

RESULTS

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 17 patients, neuroendocrine tumor in 3, mass-forming pancreatitis in 4, cystic lesion in 6, and fibrosis in 2. Six patients had a finding of a normal pancreas. The diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for pancreatic malignancy was 89%, compared with 76% and 79% for MDCT and MRI, respectively. In the differential diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (n = 21), FDG-PET/CT had a positive predictive value of 92%. In 17 patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 30% for N- and 88% for M-staging. Both MDCT and MRI had sensitivities of 30% for N- and 38% for M-staging. Furthermore, the clinical management of 10 patients (26%) was altered after FDG-PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT was more sensitive than conventional imaging in the diagnosis of both primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma and associated distant metastases. In contrast, the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT was poor in detecting local lymph node metastasis, which would have been important for an assessment of resectability. We recommend the use of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of diagnostically challenging cases, especially in patients with biliary strictures without evidence of malignancy in conventional imaging.

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET/CT and EUS in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis

The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), combined (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing patients with pancreatic carcinoma. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and some other databases, from January 1966 to April 2009, were searched for initial studies. All the studies published in English or Chinese relating to the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET, PET/CT and EUS for patients with pancreatic cancer were collected. Methodological quality was assessed. The statistic software called "Meta-Disc 1.4" was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

51 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity estimate for combined PET/CT (90.1%) was significantly higher than PET (88.4%) and EUS (81.2%). The pooled specificity estimate for EUS (93.2%) was significantly higher than PET (83.1%) and PET/CT (80.1%). The pooled DOR estimate for EUS (49.774) was significantly higher than PET (32.778) and PET/CT (27.105). SROC curves for PET/CT and EUS showed a little better diagnostic accuracy than PET alone. For PET alone, when interpreted the results with knowledge of other imaging tests, its sensitivity (89.4%) and specificity (80.1%) were closer to PET/CT. For EUS, its diagnostic value decreased in differentiating pancreatic cancer for patients with chronic pancreatitis. In conclusion, PET/CT was a high sensitive and EUS was a high specific modality in diagnosing patients with pancreatic cancer. PET/CT and EUS could play different roles during different conditions in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma.

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis with atypical pancreatic imaging findings from pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of PET/CT in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer, we analyzed the cases of 17 patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and atypical pancreatic imaging findings who underwent integrated PET/CT. The PET/CT findings on the 17 patients with autoimmune pancreatitis were compared with those of 151 patients with pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Fluorine-18 FDG uptake by the pancreas was found in all patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and in 82% (124/151) of patients with pancreatic cancer. Diffuse uptake by the pancreas was significantly more frequent in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (53% vs 3%, p < 0.001). FDG uptake by the salivary glands and kidneys was seen only in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis, the former reaching statistical significance (p = 0.003). Follow-up PET/CT after steroid therapy was performed for eight patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. After steroid therapy, none of the patients had intense FDG uptake by the pancreas or extrapancreatic organs.

CONCLUSION

In difficult cases, at PET/CT the presence of diffuse uptake of FDG by the pancreas or concomitant extrapancreatic uptake by the salivary glands can be used to aid in differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Surgical therapy of chronic pancreatitis: indications, techniques and results

In chronic pancreatitis (CP) a benign inflammatory process in the pancreas results in progressive structural changes with replacement of functional exocrine and endocrine parenchyma by a fibrotic and inflammatory tissue, often evident as an inflammatory mass. The consequences are diabetes mellitus, exocrine insufficiency, and severe recurrent upper abdominal pain, often resulting in a significant reduction in the quality of life. The inflammatory process or the formation of pseudocysts can cause local complications such as obstruction of the pancreatic duct, bile duct or the duodenum. In spite of intensive research there is still no specific therapy for CP. Medical pharmacologic treatment is the basis of therapy in CP and aims at pain relief and treatment of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. However, many patients require additional therapy for effective pain relief or treatment of local complications. Whereas a lot of these patients undergo repetitive endoscopic interventions, surgical drainage results in better long-term outcome. In patients with an inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head, surgical resection procedures provide good short and long-term results, especially in terms of pain relief. This article summarizes indications and potential of endoscopic/interventional and surgical therapy and gives an overview of surgical techniques with special focus on organ-sparing procedures such as the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and its variants. Whereas exocrine and endocrine insufficiency may progress, adequate surgical therapy can provide effective long-term pain relieve and improvement in the quality of life in patients with CP.

Mass-forming pancreatitis with positive fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose positron emission tomography and positive diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance imaging: Report of a case

It is difficult to make an accurate radiological diagnosis of a pancreatic tumor because of its location and anatomical characteristics. Mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer are particularly difficult to differentiate. New diagnostic technology, which includes diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) and 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), offers hope for the detection of classical pancreatic cancer. Few studies have been conducted on FDG-PET and DWI-MRI as tools used to distinguish between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic cancers. Furthermore, positive findings of mass-forming pancreatitis on DWI-MRI and FDG-PET have yet to be documented. We report a case of a pancreatic head tumor, present on FDG-PET and DWI-MRI which, on closer examination, revealed benign mass-forming pancreatitis. We discuss the utility of FDG-PET and DWI-MRI as preoperative diagnostic tools.