1
|
Wassenaar NPM, van Schelt AS, Schrauben EM, Kop MPM, Nio CY, Wilmink JW, Besselink MGH, van Laarhoven HWM, Stoker J, Nederveen AJ, Runge JH. MR Elastography of the Pancreas: Bowel Preparation and Repeatability Assessment in Pancreatic Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:1582-1592. [PMID: 37485870 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stromal viscoelasticity can be measured using MR elastography (MRE). Bowel preparation regimens could affect MRE quality and knowledge on repeatability is crucial for clinical implementation. PURPOSE To assess effects of four bowel preparation regimens on MRE quality and to evaluate repeatability and differentiate patients from healthy controls. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION 15 controls (41 ± 16 years; 47% female), 16 PDAC patients (one excluded, 66 ± 12 years; 40% female) with 15 age-/sex-matched controls (65 ± 11 years; 40% female). Final sample size was 25 controls and 15 PDAC. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3-T, spin-echo echo-planar-imaging, turbo spin-echo, and fast field echo gradient-echo. ASSESSMENT Four different regimens were used: fasting; scopolaminebutyl; drinking 0.5 L water; combination of 0.5 L water and scopolaminebutyl. MRE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was compared between all regimens. MRE repeatability (test-retest) and differences in shear wave speed (SWS) and phase angle (ϕ) were assessed in PDAC and controls. Regions-of-interest were defined for tumor, nontumorous (n = 8) tissue in PDAC, and whole pancreas in controls. Two radiologists delineated tumors twice for evaluation of intraobserver and interobserver variability. STATISTICAL TESTS Repeated measures analysis of variance, coefficients of variation (CoVs), Bland-Altman analysis, (un)paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Preparation regimens did not significantly influence MRE-SNR. Therefore, the least burdensome preparation (fasting only) was continued. CoVs for tumor SWS were: intrasession (12.8%) and intersession (21.7%), and intraobserver (7.9%) and interobserver (10.3%) comparisons. For controls, CoVs were intrasession (4.6%) and intersession (6.4%). Average SWS for tumor, nontumor, and healthy tissue were: 1.74 ± 0.58, 1.38 ± 0.27, and 1.18 ± 0.16 m/sec (ϕ: 1.02 ± 0.17, 0.91 ± 0.07, and 0.85 ± 0.08 rad), respectively. Significant differences were found between all groups, except for ϕ between healthy-nontumor (P = 0.094). DATA CONCLUSION The proposed bowel preparation regimens may not influence MRE quality. MRE may be able to differentiate between healthy tissue-tumor and tumor-nontumor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke P M Wassenaar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Sophie van Schelt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric M Schrauben
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix P M Kop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G H Besselink
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen H Runge
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bereska JI, Janssen BV, Nio CY, Kop MPM, Kazemier G, Busch OR, Struik F, Marquering HA, Stoker J, Besselink MG, Verpalen IM. Artificial intelligence for assessment of vascular involvement and tumor resectability on CT in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:18. [PMID: 38342782 PMCID: PMC10859357 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00419-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic model using artificial intelligence (AI) for quantifying vascular involvement and classifying tumor resectability stage in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), primarily to support radiologists in referral centers. Resectability of PDAC is determined by the degree of vascular involvement on computed tomography scans (CTs), which is associated with considerable inter-observer variability. METHODS We developed a semisupervised machine learning segmentation model to segment the PDAC and surrounding vasculature using 613 CTs of 467 patients with pancreatic tumors and 50 control patients. After segmenting the relevant structures, our model quantifies vascular involvement by measuring the degree of the vessel wall that is in contact with the tumor using AI-segmented CTs. Based on these measurements, the model classifies the resectability stage using the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria as either resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced (LA). RESULTS We evaluated the performance of the model using a test set containing 60 CTs from 60 patients, consisting of 20 resectable, 20 borderline resectable, and 20 locally advanced cases, by comparing the automated analysis obtained from the model to expert visual vascular involvement assessments. The model concurred with the radiologists on 227/300 (76%) vessels for determining vascular involvement. The model's resectability classification agreed with the radiologists on 17/20 (85%) resectable, 16/20 (80%) for borderline resectable, and 15/20 (75%) for locally advanced cases. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that an AI model may allow automatic quantification of vascular involvement and classification of resectability for PDAC. RELEVANCE STATEMENT This AI model enables automated vascular involvement quantification and resectability classification for pancreatic cancer, aiding radiologists in treatment decisions, and potentially improving patient outcomes. KEY POINTS • High inter-observer variability exists in determining vascular involvement and resectability for PDAC. • Artificial intelligence accurately quantifies vascular involvement and classifies resectability for PDAC. • Artificial intelligence can aid radiologists by automating vascular involvement and resectability assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline I Bereska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Boris V Janssen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix P M Kop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Struik
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inez M Verpalen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ingwersen EW, Bereska JI, Balduzzi A, Janssen BV, Besselink MG, Kazemier G, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Marquering HA, Nio CY, de Robertis R, Salvia R, Steyerberg EW, Stoker J, Struik F, Verpalen IM, Daams F. Radiomics preoperative-Fistula Risk Score (RAD-FRS) for pancreatoduodenectomy: development and external validation. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad100. [PMID: 37811791 PMCID: PMC10561131 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurately predicting the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy before surgery may assist surgeons in making more informed treatment decisions and improved patient counselling. The aim was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score (RAD-FRS) for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS Radiomic features were derived from preoperative CT scans from adult patients after pancreatoduodenectomy at a single centre in the Netherlands (Amsterdam, 2013-2018) to develop the radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score. Extracted radiomic features were analysed with four machine learning classifiers. The model was externally validated in a single centre in Italy (Verona, 2020-2021). The radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score was compared with the Fistula Risk Score and the updated alternative Fistula Risk Score. RESULTS Overall, 359 patients underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy, of whom 89 (25 per cent) developed a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score model was developed using CT scans of 118 patients, of which three radiomic features were included in the random forest model, and externally validated in 57 patients. The model performed well with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.99) and 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.69 to 0.92) in the Amsterdam test set and Verona data set respectively. The radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score performed similarly to the Fistula Risk Score (area under the curve 0.79) and updated alternative Fistula Risk Score (area under the curve 0.79). CONCLUSION The radiomics-based preoperative-Fistula Risk Score, which uses only preoperative CT features, is a new and promising radiomics-based score that has the potential to be integrated with hospital CT report systems and improve patient counselling before surgery. The model with underlying code is readily available via www.pancreascalculator.com and www.github.com/PHAIR-Consortium/POPF-predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik W Ingwersen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline I Bereska
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Boris V Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo de Robertis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital G.B. Rossi, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Struik
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inez M Verpalen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stoop TF, van Veldhuisen E, van Rijssen LB, Klaassen R, Gurney-Champion OJ, de Hingh IH, Busch OR, van Laarhoven HWM, van Lienden KP, Stoker J, Wilmink JW, Nio CY, Nederveen AJ, Engelbrecht MRW, Besselink MG. Added value of 3T MRI and the MRI-halo sign in assessing resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following induction chemotherapy (IMAGE-MRI): prospective pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3487-3499. [PMID: 36242618 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02653-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restaging of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after induction chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) imaging is imprecise in evaluating local tumor response. This study explored the value of 3 Tesla (3 T) contrast-enhanced (CE) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor restaging. METHODS This is a prospective pilot study including 20 consecutive patients with LAPC with RECIST non-progressive disease on CE-CT after induction chemotherapy. Restaging CE-CT, CE-MRI, and DWI-MRI were retrospectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists in consensus, scoring tumor size and vascular involvement. A halo sign was defined as replacement of solid perivascular (arterial and venous) tumor tissue by a zone of fatty-like signal intensity. RESULTS Adequate MRI was obtained in 19 patients with LAPC after induction chemotherapy. Tumor diameter was non-significantly smaller on CE-MRI compared to CE-CT (26 mm vs. 30 mm; p = 0.073). An MRI-halo sign was seen on CE-MRI in 52.6% (n = 10/19), whereas a CT-halo sign was seen in 10.5% (n = 2/19) of patients (p = 0.016). An MRI-halo sign was not associated with resection rate (60.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 1.000). In the resection cohort, patients with an MRI-halo sign had a non-significant increased R0 resection rate as compared to patients without an MRI-halo sign (66.7% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.242). Positive and negative predictive values of the CE-MRI-halo sign for R0 resection were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 3 T CE-MRI and the MRI-halo sign might be helpful to assess the effect of induction chemotherapy in patients with LAPC, but its diagnostic accuracy has to be evaluated in larger series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eran van Veldhuisen
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Bengt van Rijssen
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remy Klaassen
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver J Gurney-Champion
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brada LJH, Walma MS, Daamen LA, van Roessel S, van Dam RM, de Hingh IH, Liem MLS, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Festen S, Stommel MWJ, Bosscha K, Polée MB, Yung Nio C, Wessels FJ, de Vries JJJ, van Lienden KP, Bruijnen RC, Los M, Mohammad NH, Wilmink HW, Busch OR, Besselink MG, Quintus Molenaar I, van Santvoort HC. Predicting overall survival and resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX: Development and internal validation of two nomograms. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:589-597. [PMID: 34115379 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are increasingly treated with FOLFIRINOX, resulting in improved survival and resection of tumors that were initially unresectable. It remains unclear, however, which specific patients benefit from FOLFIRINOX. Two nomograms were developed predicting overall survival (OS) and resection at the start of FOLFIRINOX for LAPC. METHODS From our multicenter, prospective LAPC registry in 14 Dutch hospitals, LAPC patients starting first-line FOLFIRINOX (April 2015-December 2017) were included. Stepwise backward selection according to the Akaike Information Criterion was used to identify independent baseline predictors for OS and resection. Two prognostic nomograms were generated. RESULTS A total of 252 patients were included, with a median OS of 14 months. Thirty-two patients (13%) underwent resection, with a median OS of 23 months. Older age, female sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤1, and CA 19.9 < 274 were independent factors predicting a better OS (c-index: 0.61). WHO ps >1, involvement of the superior mesenteric artery, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric vein ≥ 270° were independent factors decreasing the probability of resection (c-index: 0.79). CONCLUSIONS Two nomograms were developed to predict OS and resection in patients with LAPC before starting treatment with FOLFIRINOX. These nomograms could be beneficial in the shared decision-making process and counseling of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mike L S Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Marco B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J J de Vries
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger C Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walma MS, Rombouts SJ, Brada LJH, Borel Rinkes IH, Bosscha K, Bruijnen RC, Busch OR, Creemers GJ, Daams F, van Dam RM, van Delden OM, Festen S, Ghorbani P, de Groot DJ, de Groot JWB, Haj Mohammad N, van Hillegersberg R, de Hingh IH, D'Hondt M, Kerver ED, van Leeuwen MS, Liem MS, van Lienden KP, Los M, de Meijer VE, Meijerink MR, Mekenkamp LJ, Nio CY, Oulad Abdennabi I, Pando E, Patijn GA, Polée MB, Pruijt JF, Roeyen G, Ropela JA, Stommel MWJ, de Vos-Geelen J, de Vries JJ, van der Waal EM, Wessels FJ, Wilmink JW, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. Radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PELICAN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:313. [PMID: 33926539 PMCID: PMC8082784 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 80% of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with chemotherapy, of whom approximately 10% undergo a resection. Cohort studies investigating local tumor ablation with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have reported a promising overall survival of 26–34 months when given in a multimodal setting. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of RFA in combination with chemotherapy in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods The “Pancreatic Locally Advanced Unresectable Cancer Ablation” (PELICAN) trial is an international multicenter superiority RCT, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG). All patients with LAPC according to DPCG criteria, who start with FOLFIRINOX or (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine, are screened for eligibility. Restaging is performed after completion of four cycles of FOLFIRINOX or two cycles of (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine (i.e., 2 months of treatment), and the results are assessed within a nationwide online expert panel. Eligible patients with RECIST stable disease or objective response, in whom resection is not feasible, are randomized to RFA followed by chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In total, 228 patients will be included in 16 centers in The Netherlands and four other European centers. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, RECIST response, CA 19.9 and CEA response, toxicity, quality of life, pain, costs, and immunomodulatory effects of RFA. Discussion The PELICAN RCT aims to assess whether the combination of chemotherapy and RFA improves the overall survival when compared to chemotherapy alone, in patients with LAPC with no progression of disease following 2 months of systemic treatment. Trial registration Dutch Trial RegistryNL4997. Registered on December 29, 2015. ClinicalTrials.govNCT03690323. Retrospectively registered on October 1, 2018
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Walma
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S J Rombouts
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L J H Brada
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H Borel Rinkes
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - R C Bruijnen
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - F Daams
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - O M van Delden
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Festen
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Ghorbani
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute at Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D J de Groot
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M D'Hondt
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - E D Kerver
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M S van Leeuwen
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - K P van Lienden
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L J Mekenkamp
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Oulad Abdennabi
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Pando
- HBP Surgery and Transplant Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G A Patijn
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - M B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - J F Pruijt
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - G Roeyen
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J A Ropela
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J J de Vries
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M van der Waal
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F J Wessels
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Departments of Surgery, Radiology and Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walma MS, Brada LJ, Patuleia SIS, Blomjous JG, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Bruijnen RC, Busch OR, Creemers GJ, Daams F, van Dam R, Festen S, Jan de Groot D, Willem de Groot J, Mohammad NH, Hermans JJ, de Hingh IH, Kerver ED, van Leeuwen MS, van der Leij C, Liem MS, van Lienden KP, Los M, de Meijer VE, Meijerink MR, Mekenkamp LJ, Nederend J, Nio CY, Patijn GA, Polée MB, Pruijt JF, Renken NS, Rombouts SJ, Schouten TJ, Stommel MWJ, Verweij ME, de Vos-Geelen J, de Vries JJJ, Vulink A, Wessels FJ, Wilmink JW, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter prospective cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:699-707. [PMID: 33280952 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since current studies on locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) mainly report from single, high-volume centers, it is unclear if outcomes can be translated to daily clinical practice. This study provides treatment strategies and clinical outcomes within a multicenter cohort of unselected patients with LAPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with LAPC according to Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria, were prospectively included in 14 centers from April 2015 until December 2017. A centralized expert panel reviewed response according to RECIST v1.1 and potential surgical resectability. Primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS), stratified for primary treatment strategy. RESULTS Overall, 422 patients were included, of whom 77% (n = 326) received chemotherapy. The majority started with FOLFIRINOX (77%, 252/326) with a median of six cycles (IQR 4-10). Gemcitabine monotherapy was given to 13% (41/326) of patients and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine to 10% (33/326), with a median of two (IQR 3-5) and three (IQR 3-5) cycles respectively. The mOS of the entire cohort was 10 months (95%CI 9-11). In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy, or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, mOS was 14 (95%CI 13-15), 9 (95%CI 8-10), and 9 months (95%CI 8-10), respectively. A resection was performed in 13% (32/252) of patients after FOLFIRINOX, resulting in a mOS of 23 months (95%CI 12-34). CONCLUSION This multicenter unselected cohort of patients with LAPC resulted in a 14 month mOS and a 13% resection rate after FOLFIRINOX. These data put previous results in perspective, enable us to inform patients with more accurate survival numbers and will support decision-making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke S Walma
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lilly J Brada
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susana I S Patuleia
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Thomas L Bollen
- Dept. of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Dept. of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C Bruijnen
- Dept. of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Dept. of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Derk Jan de Groot
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Dept. of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Emile D Kerver
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten S van Leeuwen
- Dept. of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S Liem
- Dept. of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Dept. of Radiology Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amstrdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Dept. of Radiology Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amstrdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie J Mekenkamp
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Dept. of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Dept. of Radiology Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amstrdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Dept. of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Marco B Polée
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes F Pruijt
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Nomdo S Renken
- Dept. of Radiology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Steffi J Rombouts
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thijs J Schouten
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike E Verweij
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J J de Vries
- Dept. of Radiology Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amstrdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelie Vulink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Dept. of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Slooter MD, Talboom K, Sharabiany S, van Helsdingen CPM, van Dieren S, Ponsioen CY, Nio CY, Consten ECJ, Wijsman JH, Boermeester MA, Derikx JPM, Musters GD, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Hompes R. IMARI: multi-Interventional program for prevention and early Management of Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in Rectal cancer patIents: rationale and study protocol. BMC Surg 2020; 20:240. [PMID: 33059647 PMCID: PMC7565357 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00890-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is still a common and feared complication after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. The multifactorial pathophysiology of AL and lack of standardised treatment options requires a multi-modal approach to improve long-term anastomotic integrity. The objective of the IMARI-trial is to determine whether the one-year anastomotic integrity rate in patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer can be improved using a multi-interventional program. Methods IMARI is a multicentre prospective clinical effectiveness trial, whereby current local practice (control cohort) will be evaluated, and subsequently compared to results after implementation of the multi-interventional program (intervention cohort). Patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer will be included. The multi-interventional program includes three preventive interventions (mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, tailored full splenic flexure mobilization and intraoperative fluorescence angiography using indocyanine green) combined with a standardised pathway for early detection and active management of AL. The primary outcome is anastomotic integrity, confirmed by CT-scan at one year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include incidence of AL, protocol compliance and association with AL, temporary and permanent stoma rate, reintervention rate, quality of life and functional outcome. Microbiome analysis will be conducted to investigate the role of the rectal microbiome in AL. In a Dutch nationwide study, the AL rate was 20%, with anastomotic integrity of 90% after one year. Based on an expected reduction of AL due to the preventive approaches of 50%, and increase of anastomotic integrity by a standardised pathway for early detection and active management of AL, we hypothesised that the anastomotic integrity rate will increase from 90 to 97% at one year. An improvement of 7% in anastomotic integrity at one year was considered clinically relevant. A total number of 488 patients (244 per cohort) are needed to detect this difference, with 80% statistical power. Discussion The IMARI-trial is designed to evaluate whether a multi-interventional program can improve long-term anastomotic integrity after rectal cancer surgery. The uniqueness of IMARI lies in the multi-modal design that addresses the multifactorial pathophysiology for prevention, and a standardised pathway for early detection and active treatment of AL. Trial registration Trialregister.nl (NL8261), January 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Talboom
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S Sharabiany
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - S van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - J H Wijsman
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P M Derikx
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G D Musters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Rijn KL, Lansdorp CA, Tielbeek JAW, Nio CY, Buskens CJ, D'Haens GRAM, Löwenberg M, Stoker J. Evaluation of the modified Van Assche index for assessing response to anti-TNF therapy with MRI in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Clin Imaging 2019; 59:179-187. [PMID: 31821976 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important to guide clinical decisions of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. PURPOSE To evaluate the recently developed modified Van Assche index to assess clinical responses to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with perianal fistulizing CD. METHODS A search of medical records identified patients with fistulizing perianal CD who underwent baseline and follow-up MRI while receiving anti-TNF treatment. Patients were divided into clinical responders and non-responders based on physician's assessment. MRI-scans were scored using the original and modified Van Assche index and scores between baseline and follow-up were compared within clinical responders and non-responders. RESULTS Thirty cases were included (48% female, median age 27 years). Clinical responders (n = 16) had a median modified Van Assche score of 9.6 (IQR 5.8-12.7) at baseline and 5.8 (IQR 3.5-8.5) at follow-up (p = 0.008). In non-responders (n = 14), corresponding scores were 7.7 (IQR 5.8-13.5) and 8.2 (IQR 5.8-11.5) (p = 0.624). In clinical responders, 6/16 showed no drop in modified Van Assche score at follow-up. Scores obtained with the original Van Assche index dropped between baseline and follow-up in clinical responders (13.0 vs. 9.6, p = 0.011), whereas no decrease was observed in non-responders (11.5 vs. 11.5, p = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS While the modified Van Assche index overall decreases significantly in patients with perianal fistulas responding to anti-TNF treatment, one third of responders had unaltered scores at follow-up. Also, outcomes were comparable to the original Van Assche index. Further optimization of the modified Van Assche index is needed before application in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyra L van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Corine A Lansdorp
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A W Tielbeek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne J Buskens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, the Netherlands
| | - Geert R A M D'Haens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Veldhuisen E, Walma MS, van Rijssen LB, Busch OR, Bruijnen RCG, van Delden OM, Mohammad NH, de Hingh IH, Yo LS, van Laarhoven HW, van Leeuwen MS, Nio CY, van Santvoort HC, de Vries J, Wessels FJ, Wilmink JW, Molenaar IQ, Besselink MG, van Lienden KP. Added value of intra-operative ultrasound to determine the resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (IMAGE): a prospective multicenter study. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1385-1392. [PMID: 31010633 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Determining the resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy is challenging because CT-scans cannot reliably assess vascular involvement. This study evaluates the added value of intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) in LAPC following FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy. METHODS Prospective multicenter study in patients with LAPC who underwent explorative laparotomy with IOUS after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Resectability was defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. IOUS findings were compared with preoperative CT-scans and pathology results. RESULTS CT-staging in 38 patients with LAPC after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy defined 22 patients LAPC, 15 borderline resectable and one resectable. IOUS defined 19 patients LAPC, 13 borderline resectable and six resectable. In 12/38 patients, IOUS changed the resectability status including five patients from borderline resectable to resectable and five patients from LAPC to borderline resectable. Two patients were upstaged from borderline resectable to LAPC. Tumor diameters were significantly smaller upon IOUS (31.7 ± 9.5 mm versus 37.1 ± 10.0 mm, p = 0.001) and resectability varied significantly (p = 0.043). Ultimately, 20 patients underwent resection of whom 14 were evaluated as (borderline) resectable on CT-scan, and 17 on IOUS. DISCUSSION This prospective study demonstrates that IOUS may change the resectability status up to a third of patients with LAPC following FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran van Veldhuisen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L Bengt van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Lonneke S Yo
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Puylaert CAJ, Tielbeek JAW, Schüffler PJ, Nio CY, Horsthuis K, Mearadji B, Ponsioen CY, Vos FM, Stoker J. Comparison of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of the terminal ileum in Crohn's disease patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:398-405. [PMID: 30109377 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1734-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to compare the performance of contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DW)-MRI in grading Crohn's disease activity of the terminal ileum. METHODS Three readers evaluated CE-MRI, DW-MRI, and their combinations (CE/DW-MRI and DW/CE-MRI, depending on which protocol was used at the start of evaluation). Disease severity grading scores were correlated to the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS). Diagnostic accuracy, severity grading, and levels of confidence were compared between imaging protocols and interobserver agreement was calculated. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were included (30 female, median age 36). Diagnostic accuracy for active disease for CE-MRI, DW-MRI, CE/DW-MRI, and DW/CE-MRI ranged between 0.82 and 0.85, 0.75 and 0.83, 0.79 and 0.84, and 0.74 and 0.82, respectively. Severity grading correlation to CDEIS ranged between 0.70 and 0.74, 0.66 and 0.70, 0.69 and 0.75, and 0.67 and 0.74, respectively. For each reader, CE-MRI values were consistently higher than DW-MRI, albeit not significantly. Confidence levels for all readers were significantly higher for CE-MRI compared to DW-MRI (P < 0.001). Further increased confidence was seen when using combined imaging protocols. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference of CE-MRI and DW-MRI in determining disease activity, but the higher confidence levels may favor CE-MRI. DW-MRI is a good alternative in cases with relative contraindications for the use of intravenous contrast medium.
Collapse
|
12
|
Puylaert CAJ, Schüffler PJ, Naziroglu RE, Tielbeek JAW, Li Z, Makanyanga JC, Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Nio CY, Pendsé DA, Menys A, Ponsioen CY, Atkinson D, Forbes A, Buhmann JM, Fuchs TJ, Hatzakis H, van Vliet LJ, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Vos FM. Semiautomatic Assessment of the Terminal Ileum and Colon in Patients with Crohn Disease Using MRI (the VIGOR++ Project). Acad Radiol 2018; 25:1038-1045. [PMID: 29428210 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to develop and validate a predictive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity score for ileocolonic Crohn disease activity based on both subjective and semiautomatic MRI features. MATERIALS AND METHODS An MRI activity score (the "virtual gastrointestinal tract [VIGOR]" score) was developed from 27 validated magnetic resonance enterography datasets, including subjective radiologist observation of mural T2 signal and semiautomatic measurements of bowel wall thickness, excess volume, and dynamic contrast enhancement (initial slope of increase). A second subjective score was developed based on only radiologist observations. For validation, two observers applied both scores and three existing scores to a prospective dataset of 106 patients (59 women, median age 33) with known Crohn disease, using the endoscopic Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) as a reference standard. RESULTS The VIGOR score (17.1 × initial slope of increase + 0.2 × excess volume + 2.3 × mural T2) and other activity scores all had comparable correlation to the CDEIS scores (observer 1: r = 0.58 and 0.59, and observer 2: r = 0.34-0.40 and 0.43-0.51, respectively). The VIGOR score, however, improved interobserver agreement compared to the other activity scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81 vs 0.44-0.59). A diagnostic accuracy of 80%-81% was seen for the VIGOR score, similar to the other scores. CONCLUSIONS The VIGOR score achieves comparable accuracy to conventional MRI activity scores, but with significantly improved reproducibility, favoring its use for disease monitoring and therapy evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl A J Puylaert
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter J Schüffler
- Department of Computer Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robiel E Naziroglu
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A W Tielbeek
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zhang Li
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
| | - Jesica C Makanyanga
- Center for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Douglas A Pendsé
- Center for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Menys
- Center for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Atkinson
- Center for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alastair Forbes
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Joachim M Buhmann
- Department of Computer Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas J Fuchs
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Lucas J van Vliet
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Center for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Frans M Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, P.O 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, van Klaveren D, Coelen RJ, Nio CY, Allen PJ, Besselink MG, Busch OR, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, van Gulik TM, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative Risk Score to Predict Occult Metastatic or Locally Advanced Disease in Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma on Imaging. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 227:238-246.e2. [PMID: 29627334 PMCID: PMC6089225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) on imaging are diagnosed intraoperatively with occult metastatic or locally advanced disease, precluding a curative-intent resection. This study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative risk score. STUDY DESIGN Patients with resectable PHC on imaging who underwent operations in 2 high-volume centers (US and Europe) between 2000 and 2015 were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the risk score. Cross-validation was used to validate the score, alternating the 2 centers as "training" and "testing" datasets. RESULTS Of 566 patients who underwent operations, 309 (55%) patients had a resection, and in 257 (45%) patients, a curative-intent resection was precluded due to distant metastasis (n = 151 [27%]) or locally advanced disease (n = 106 [19%]). Preoperative predictors included bilirubin >2 mg/dL, bile duct involvement on imaging, portal vein involvement on imaging (≥180 degrees), hepatic artery involvement on imaging (≥180 degrees), and suspicious lymph nodes on imaging. The new risk score (c-index 0.75 after cross-validation) provided significantly more accurate predictions than the Bismuth classification (c-index 0.62), Blumgart T-staging (c-index 0.67), and cTNM staging (c-index 0.68). The new risk score identified 4 risk groups for occult metastatic or locally advanced disease: low (14.7%), intermediate (29.5%), high (47.3%), and very high risk (81.3%). The preoperative score groups also predicted survival after operation, irrespective of intraoperative findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The validated risk score can predict occult distant metastatic or locally advanced PHC based on 5 preoperatively available factors. The score can be useful in preoperative shared decision making and selection of patients in neoadjuvant clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimme K Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Samaan MA, Puylaert CAJ, Levesque BG, Zou GY, Stitt L, Taylor SA, Shackelton LM, Vandervoort MK, Khanna R, Santillan C, Rimola J, Hindryckx P, Nio CY, Sandborn WJ, D'Haens G, Feagan BG, Jairath V, Stoker J. The development of a magnetic resonance imaging index for fistulising Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 46:516-528. [PMID: 28653753 DOI: 10.1111/apt.14190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Revised: 10/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for assessment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (CD). The Van Assche index is the most commonly used MRI fistula index. AIMS To assess the reliability of the Van Assche index, and to modify the instrument to improve reliability and create a novel index for fistulising CD. METHODS A consensus process developed scoring conventions for existing Van Assche index component items and new items. Four experienced radiologists evaluated 50 MRI images in random order on three occasions. Reliability was assessed by estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Common sources of disagreement were identified and recommendations made to minimise disagreement. A mixed effects model used a 100 mm visual anologue scale (VAS) for global severity as outcome and component items as predictors to create a modified Van Assche index. RESULTS Intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) for intra-rater reliability of the original and modified Van Assche indices and the VAS were 0.86 (0.81-0.90), 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.86 (0.82-0.89). Corresponding ICCs for inter-rater reliability were 0.66 (0.52-0.76), 0.67 (0.55-0.75) and 0.58 (0.47-0.66). Sources of disagreement included number, location, and extension of fistula tracts, and rectal wall involvement. A modified Van Assche index (range 0-24) was created that included seven component items. CONCLUSIONS Although "almost perfect" intra-rater reliability was observed for the assessment of MRI images for fistulising CD using the Van Assche index, inter-rater reliability was considerably lower. Our modification of this index should result in a more optimal instrument.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada
| | - C A J Puylaert
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B G Levesque
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - G Y Zou
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - L Stitt
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada
| | - S A Taylor
- Department of Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - R Khanna
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - C Santillan
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - J Rimola
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Hindryckx
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada.,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - G D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Robarts Clinical Trials, BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B G Feagan
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - V Jairath
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc, London, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - J Stoker
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Purpose Adequate small bowel distension in MR enterography is important for the evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease patients. While distension of the distal small bowel can be achieved using standard oral contrast preparation, proximal small bowel distension remains a common impediment. The aim of this study was to compare small bowel distension between a 60-min oral contrast preparation and a 45-min oral contrast preparation. Methods Fifty retrospectively included patients with a 60-min oral preparation protocol and 50 prospectively included patients with a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol were included in the study. Both groups gradually ingested a total of 1600 mL 2% Mannitol solution during the preparation time. Two observers independently graded distension of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and (neo-) terminal ileum. Total small bowel distension was calculated as the sum of all small bowel segment scores. Individual and averaged observer distension scores were compared between both groups of patients using χ2 test for ordinal variables. Results Significant differences in distension for one of both observers in favor of the 45-min protocol were found for the stomach (p = 0.04), duodenum (p = 0.02), jejunum (p = 0.02), and total small bowel (p = 0.02). When distension scores were averaged between observers, the stomach, jejunum, and total small bowel showed a significant difference in favor of the 45-min protocol (p = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). Conclusion We advise to use a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol for MR enterography for improved overall small bowel distension, proximal small bowel distension, and especially jejunal distension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M I J Bekendam
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - C A J Puylaert
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S K S S Phoa
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Stoker
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van der Geest LGM, Lemmens VEPP, de Hingh IHJT, van Laarhoven CJHM, Bollen TL, Nio CY, van Eijck CHJ, Busch ORC, Besselink MG. Nationwide outcomes in patients undergoing surgical exploration without resection for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1568-1577. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite improvements in diagnostic imaging and staging, unresectable pancreatic cancer is still encountered during surgical exploration with curative intent. This nationwide study investigated outcomes in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer found during surgical exploration.
Methods
All patients diagnosed with primary pancreatic (adeno)carcinoma (2009–2013) in the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included. Predictors of unresectability, 30-day mortality and poor survival were evaluated using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Results
There were 10 595 patients with pancreatic cancer during the study interval. The proportion of patients undergoing surgical exploration increased from 19·9 to 27·0 per cent (P < 0·001). Among 2356 patients who underwent surgical exploration, the proportion of patients with tumour resection increased from 61·6 per cent in 2009 to 71·3 per cent in 2013 (P < 0·001), whereas the contribution of M1 disease (18·5 per cent overall) remained stable. Patients who had exploration only had an increased 30-day mortality rate compared with those who underwent tumour resection (7·8 versus 3·8 per cent; P < 0·001). In the non-resected group, among those with M0 (383 patients) and M1 (435) disease at surgical exploration, the 30-day mortality rate was 4·7 and 10·6 per cent (P = 0·002), median survival was 7·2 and 4·4 months (P < 0·001), and 1-year survival rates were 28·0 and 12·9 per cent, respectively. Among other factors, low hospital volume (0–20 resections per year) was an independent predictor for not undergoing tumour resection, but also for 30-day mortality and poor survival among patients without tumour resection.
Conclusion
Exploration and resection rates increased, but one-third of patients who had surgical exploration for pancreatic cancer did not undergo resection. Non-resectional surgery doubled the 30-day mortality rate compared with that in patients undergoing tumour resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G M van der Geest
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - T L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Puylaert CA, Tielbeek JA, Bipat S, Boellaard TN, Nio CY, Stoker J. Long-Term Performance of Readers Trained in Grading Crohn Disease Activity Using MRI. Acad Radiol 2016; 23:1539-1544. [PMID: 27665236 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We aim to evaluate the long-term performance of readers who had participated in previous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reader training in grading Crohn disease activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen readers (8 women; 12 radiologists, 2 residents; mean age 40; range 31-59), who had participated in a previous MRI reader training, participated in a follow-up evaluation after a mean interval of 29 months (range 25-34 months). Follow-up evaluation comprised 25 MRI cases of suspected or known Crohn disease patients with direct feedback; cases were identical to the evaluation set used in the initial reader training (of which readers were unaware). Grading accuracy, overstaging, and understaging were compared between training and follow-up using a consensus score by two experienced abdominal radiologists as the reference standard. RESULTS In the follow-up evaluation, overall grading accuracy was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%-81%), which was comparable to reader training grading accuracy (72%, 95% CI: 61%-80%) (P = .66). Overstaging decreased significantly from 19% (95% CI: 12%-27%) to 13% (95% CI: 8%-21%) between training and follow-up (P = .03), whereas understaging increased significantly from 9% (95% CI: 4%-21%) to 14% (95% CI: 7%-26%) (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Readers have consistent long-term accuracy for grading Crohn disease activity after case-based reader training with direct feedback.
Collapse
|
18
|
Van Rijssen LB, van Huijgevoort NCM, Coelen RJS, Tol JA, Haverkort EB, Nio CY, Busch OR, Besselink MG. Skeletal Muscle Quality is Associated with Worse Survival After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary, Nonpancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:272-280. [PMID: 27638672 PMCID: PMC5179584 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5495-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Body composition measures may predict outcomes of cancer surgery. Whereas low muscle mass shown on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans has been associated with worse outcomes after surgery for pancreatic cancer, less consideration has been given to low muscle attenuation, reflecting poor muscle quality. Studies relating muscle mass and muscle attenuation with outcomes for patients with periampullary, nonpancreatic cancer are lacking. METHODS Skeletal muscle mass and attenuation were assessed in 166 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary, nonpancreatic cancer at a single center between 2000 and 2012. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated from cross-sectional muscle area on preoperative CT imaging at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3) and normalized for height. The skeletal muscle attenuation index (MAI) was calculated by measuring the average Hounsfield units of the total muscle area at the L3 level. Overall survival (OS) and the rate of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) were extracted from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS Low SMI was present in 78.3 % and low MAI in 48.8 % of the patients. The multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.9], microscopic radicality (HR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2-3.4), and low MAI (HR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2-3.3), but not low SMI to be significantly associated with decreased OS. Low MAI (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.0-3.8) was the only independent risk factor for major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Skeletal muscle quality, but not muscle mass, predicted survival and major complications after PD for periampullary, nonpancreatic cancer. Preoperative CT-derived body composition measures may stratify patients into risk categories and support shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B Van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - R J S Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A Tol
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E B Haverkort
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harinck F, Konings ICAW, Kluijt I, Poley JW, van Hooft JE, van Dullemen HM, Nio CY, Krak NC, Hermans JJ, Aalfs CM, Wagner A, Sijmons RH, Biermann K, van Eijck CH, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Fockens P, Bruno MJ. A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Gut 2016; 65:1505-13. [PMID: 25986944 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRI are promising tests to detect precursors and early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in high-risk individuals (HRIs). It is unclear which screening technique is to be preferred. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EUS and MRI in their ability to detect clinically relevant lesions in HRI. DESIGN Multicentre prospective study. The results of 139 asymptomatic HRI (>10-fold increased risk) undergoing first-time screening by EUS and MRI are described. Clinically relevant lesions were defined as solid lesions, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and cysts ≥10 mm. Results were compared in a blinded, independent fashion. RESULTS Two solid lesions (mean size 9 mm) and nine cysts ≥10 mm (mean size 17 mm) were detected in nine HRI (6%). Both solid lesions were detected by EUS only and proved to be a stage I PDAC and a multifocal pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 2. Of the nine cysts ≥10 mm, six were detected by both imaging techniques and three were detected by MRI only. The agreement between EUS and MRI for the detection of clinically relevant lesions was 55%. Of these clinically relevant lesions detected by both techniques, there was a good agreement for location and size. CONCLUSIONS EUS and/or MRI detected clinically relevant pancreatic lesions in 6% of HRI. Both imaging techniques were complementary rather than interchangeable: contrary to EUS, MRI was found to be very sensitive for the detection of cystic lesions of any size; MRI, however, might have some important limitations with regard to the timely detection of solid lesions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wiggers JK, Koerkamp BG, Coelen RJ, Rauws EA, Schattner MA, Nio CY, Brown KT, Gonen M, van Dieren S, van Lienden KP, Allen PJ, Besselink MGH, Busch ORC, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Gouma DJ, Kingham TP, Jarnagin WR, van Gulik TM. Preoperative biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: identifying patients who require percutaneous drainage after failed endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 2015; 47:1124-31. [PMID: 26382308 PMCID: PMC4745253 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Preoperative biliary drainage is often initiated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but additional percutaneous transhepatic catheter (PTC) drainage is frequently required. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify patients with a high risk of inadequate ERCP drainage. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with potentially resectable PHC and (attempted) preoperative ERCP drainage were included from two specialty center cohorts between 2001 and 2013. Indications for additional PTC drainage were failure to place an endoscopic stent, failure to relieve jaundice, cholangitis, or insufficient drainage of the future liver remnant. A prediction model was derived from the European cohort and externally validated in the USA cohort. RESULTS Of the 288 patients, 108 (38%) required additional preoperative PTC drainage after inadequate ERCP drainage. Independent risk factors for additional PTC drainage were proximal biliary obstruction on preoperative imaging (Bismuth 3 or 4) and predrainage total bilirubin level. The prediction model identified three subgroups: patients with low risk (7%), moderate risk (40%), and high risk (62%). The high-risk group consisted of patients with a total bilirubin level above 150 µmol/L and Bismuth 3a or 4 tumors, who typically require preoperative drainage of the angulated left bile ducts. The prediction model had good discrimination (area under the curve 0.74) and adequate calibration in the external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Selected patients with potentially resectable PHC have a high risk (62%) of inadequate preoperative ERCP drainage requiring additional PTC drainage. These patients might do better with initial PTC drainage instead of ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimme K Wiggers
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - Robert J Coelen
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - Erik A Rauws
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Gastroenterology
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Gastroenterology
| | - C Yung Nio
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Radiology
| | - Karen T Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Radiology
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Statistics
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Clinical Research Unit
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Radiology
| | - Peter J Allen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
| | - Marc GH Besselink
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - Olivier RC Busch
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - Michael I D’Angelica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
| | - Robert P DeMatteo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
| | - Dirk J Gouma
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer MGJ, Bipat S, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J. Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial. Eur Radiol 2015; 26:2762-70. [PMID: 26560732 PMCID: PMC4927597 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4081-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is a viable option for 6-9 mm polyps at CTC screening for colorectal cancer. We established participation and diagnostic yield of surveillance and determined overall yield of CTC screening. Material and methods In an invitational CTC screening trial 82 of 982 participants harboured 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s) for which surveillance CTC was advised. Only participants with one or more lesion(s) ≥6 mm at surveillance CTC were offered colonoscopy (OC); 13 had undergone preliminary OC. The surveillance CTC yield was defined as the number of participants with advanced neoplasia in the 82 surveillance participants, and was added to the primary screening yield. Results Sixty-five of 82 participants were eligible for surveillance CTC of which 56 (86.2 %) participated. Advanced neoplasia was diagnosed in 15/56 participants (26.8 %) and 9/13 (69.2 %) with preliminary OC. Total surveillance yield was 24/82 (29.3 %). No carcinomas were detected. Adding surveillance results to initial screening CTC yield significantly increased the advanced neoplasia yield per 100 CTC participants (6.1 to 8.6; p < 0.001) and per 100 invitees (2.1 to 2.9; p < 0.001). Conclusion Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps has a substantial yield of advanced adenomas and significantly increased the CTC yield in population screening. Key Points • The participation rate in surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is 86 %. • Advanced adenoma prevalence in a 6-9 mm CTC surveillance population is high. • Surveillance CTC significantly increases the yield of population screening by CTC. • Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps is a safe strategy. • Surveillance CTC is unlikely to yield new important extracolonic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, PO Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, G1-215, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet C de Haan
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten G J Thomeer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shandra Bipat
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina Biermann
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Beenen LFM, Sierink JC, Kolkman S, Nio CY, Saltzherr TP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Goslings JC. Split bolus technique in polytrauma: a prospective study on scan protocols for trauma analysis. Acta Radiol 2015; 56:873-80. [PMID: 25033993 DOI: 10.1177/0284185114539319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2013] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the evaluation of severely injured trauma patients a variety of total body computed tomography (CT) scanning protocols exist. Frequently multiple pass protocols are used. A split bolus contrast protocol can reduce the number of passes through the body, and thereby radiation exposure, in this relatively young and vitally threatened population. PURPOSE To evaluate three protocols for single pass total body scanning in 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) on optimal image quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three total body CT protocols were prospectively evaluated in three series of 10 consecutive trauma patients. In Group A unenhanced brain and cervical spine CT was followed by chest-abdomen-pelvis CT in portovenous phase after repositioning of the arms. Group B underwent brain CT followed without arm repositioning by a one-volume contrast CT from skull base to the pubic symphysis. Group C was identical to Group A, but the torso was scanned with a split bolus technique. Three radiologists independently evaluated protocol quality scores (5-point Likert scale), parenchymal and vascular enhancement and artifacts. RESULTS Overall image quality was good (4.10) in Group A, more than satisfactory (3.38) in Group B, and nearly excellent (4.75) in Group C (P < 0.001). Interfering artifacts were mostly reported in Group B in the liver and spleen. CONCLUSION In single pass total body CT scanning a split bolus technique reached the highest overall image quality compared to conventional total body CT and one-volume contrast CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludo FM Beenen
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne C Sierink
- Trauma Unit Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Kolkman
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Teun Peter Saltzherr
- Trauma Unit Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Carel Goslings
- Trauma Unit Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gerritsen A, Bollen TL, Nio CY, Molenaar IQ, Dijkgraaf MG, van Santvoort HC, Offerhaus GJ, Brosens LA, Biermann K, Sieders E, de Jong KP, van Dam RM, van der Harst E, van Goor H, van Ramshorst B, Bonsing BA, de Hingh IH, Gerhards MF, van Eijck CH, Gouma DJ, Borel Rinkes IH, Busch OR, Besselink MG. Diagnostic value of a pancreatic mass on computed tomography in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed pancreatic cancer. Surgery 2015; 158:173-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Revised: 02/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
24
|
Eshuis WJ, Tol JAMG, Nio CY, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Leakage of the gastroenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2014; 156:75-82. [PMID: 24929760 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 03/26/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common anastomotic complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are leakage from the pancreaticojejunostomy or hepaticojejunostomy. Leakage from the gastroenteric anastomosis has rarely been described. We evaluated the incidence of gastroenteric leakage after PD and described its presentation, treatment, and outcome. METHODS Between 1992 and 2012, a consecutive series of 1,036 patients underwent PD in the Academic Medical Center. By use of a prospective database and medical records, we identified patients with gastroenteric leakage. Clinicopathologic data were compared with patients without gastroenteric leakage, and presentation, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcome of gastroenteric leaks were analyzed. RESULTS Twelve patients (1.2%) had gastroenteric leakage. Patients with gastroenteric leaks had undergone longer operative procedures, had more pancreatic fistulas and other complications, and had a significantly longer hospital stay. Median postoperative day of diagnosis was 8 (range, 2-23). Clinical signs included tender abdomen and high drain output suspicious of gastric content. Common radiologic findings were pneumoperitoneum and intra-abdominal fluid. Seven patients (58%) were treated operatively, 4 (33%) by percutaneous drainage, and 1 (8%) underwent no specific treatment duo to his poor clinical condition. This patient died in hospital, resulting in a hospital mortality of 8%. CONCLUSION Gastroenteric leakage after PD is rare. Clinical presentation is not specific, unlike leakage from other sites. Drain output suspicious of gastric content may help to differentiate from pancreatic or hepatic anastomotic leakage. It may be associated with a longer duration of operation and concomitant pancreatic fistula. A good outcome depends on prompt diagnosis and is mostly achieved by operative intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietse J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Johanna A M G Tol
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Gouma
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gerritsen A, Molenaar IQ, Bollen TL, Nio CY, Dijkgraaf MG, van Santvoort HC, Offerhaus GJ, Brosens LA, Biermann K, Sieders E, de Jong KP, van Dam RM, van der Harst E, van Goor H, van Ramshorst B, Bonsing BA, de Hingh IH, Gerhards MF, van Eijck CH, Gouma DJ, Borel Rinkes IHM, Busch ORC, Besselink MG. Preoperative characteristics of patients with presumed pancreatic cancer but ultimately benign disease: a multicenter series of 344 pancreatoduodenectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3999-4006. [PMID: 24871781 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3810-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative differentiation between malignant and benign pancreatic tumors can be difficult. Consequently, a proportion of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for suspected malignancy will ultimately have benign disease. The aim of this study was to compare preoperative clinical and diagnostic characteristics of patients with unexpected benign disease after pancreatoduodenectomy with those of patients with confirmed (pre)malignant disease. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study in 1,629 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for suspected malignancy between 2003 and 2010 in 11 Dutch centers. Preoperative characteristics were compared in a benign:malignant ratio of 1:3. Malignant cases were selected from the entire cohort by using a random number list. A multivariable logistic regression prediction model was constructed to predict benign disease. RESULTS Of 107 patients (6.6 %) with unexpected benign disease after pancreatoduodenectomy, 86 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were compared with 258 patients with (pre)malignant disease. Patients with benign disease presented more often with pain (56 vs. 38 %; P = 0.004), but less frequently with jaundice (60 vs. 80 %; P < 0.01), a pancreatic mass (13 vs. 54 %, P < 0.001), or a double duct sign on computed tomography (21 vs. 47 %; P < 0.001). In a prediction model using these parameters, only 19 % of patients with benign disease were correctly predicted, and 1.4 % of patients with malignant disease were missed. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 7 % of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for suspected malignancy were ultimately diagnosed with benign disease. Although some preoperative clinical and imaging characteristics might indicate absence of malignancy, their discriminatory value is insufficient for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arja Gerritsen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boellaard TN, Henneman ODF, Streekstra GJ, Venema HW, Nio CY, van Dorth-Rombouts MC, Stoker J. The feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping. Clin Radiol 2013; 68:799-806. [PMID: 23615035 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2012] [Revised: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping and without bowel preparation or bowel distension. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients scheduled for preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) because of diagnosed or high suspicion for colorectal cancer were prospectively included in the study. A single contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquisition using dual-source mode (100 kV/140 kV) was performed without bowel preparation. Weighted average 120 kV images and iodine maps were created with post-processing. Two observers performed a blinded read for colorectal lesions after being trained on three colorectal cancer patients. One observer performed an unblinded read for lesion detectability and placed a region of interest (ROI) within each lesion. RESULTS In total 21 patients were included and 18 had a colorectal cancer at the time of the CT acquisition. Median cancer size was 43 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 27-60 mm] and all 18 colorectal cancers were visible on the 120 kV images and iodine map during the unblinded read. During the blinded read, observers found 90% (27/30) of the cancers with 120 kV images only and 96.7% (29/30) after viewing the iodine map in addition (p = 0.5). Median enhancement of colorectal cancers was 29.9 HU (IQR 23.1-34.6). The largest benign lesions (70 and 25 mm) were visible on the 120 kV images and iodine map, whereas four smaller benign lesions (7-15 mm) were not. CONCLUSION Colorectal cancers are visible on the contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT without bowel preparation or insufflation. Because of the patient-friendly nature of this approach, further studies should explore its use for colorectal cancer detection in frail and elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Minnaar EM, Human KE, Henneman D, Nio CY, Bisschop PH, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM. An adrenal incidentaloma: how often is it detected and what are the consequences? ISRN Radiol 2013; 2013:871959. [PMID: 24967279 PMCID: PMC4045521 DOI: 10.5402/2013/871959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2012] [Accepted: 11/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the detection rate of adrenal incidentalomas and subsequent workup. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Methods. Two investigators evaluated the adrenals on abdominal CT scans. Abnormalities were compared to the original radiology reports and an experienced abdominal radiologist reviewed the CT scans. All additional imaging and laboratory tests were assessed. Results. The investigators detected 44/356 adrenal incidentalomas (12%). In 25 patients an adrenal incidentaloma had been noted in the radiology report. The expert radiologist agreed on 19 incidentalomas in 17 patients, two with bilateral incidentalomas. Of the 25 incidentaloma patients, 4 (16%) patients were screened for hormonal overproduction and 2 (8%) patients had follow-up imaging studies. Conclusions. 12% of the patients had an adrenal incidentaloma (42 of 356). 17 (40%) had initially not been reported by the radiologist. When diagnosed with an adrenal incidentaloma, only a small percentage of patients (16%) is screened or undergoes repeated imaging (8%) as proposed in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on adrenal incidentalomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Minnaar
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, G4 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K E Human
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, G4 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Henneman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, G4 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P H Bisschop
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, F4, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E J M Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, G4 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
de Jong K, van Hooft JE, Nio CY, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bruno MJ, Fockens P. Accuracy of preoperative workup in a prospective series of surgically resected cystic pancreatic lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47:1056-63. [PMID: 22571417 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.674970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are considered useful techniques in the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. Aim of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of these techniques. METHODS This study included consecutive patients who underwent MRI, EUS, and EUS-FNA for a pancreatic cyst that was eventually resected surgically. Observers scored for cyst characteristics, a distinction between mucinous and non-mucinous cysts and a suspicion of malignancy. The interobserver agreement between MRI and EUS was calculated. RESULTS A total of 32 patients were included. Sensitivity for diagnosing a mucinous cyst was 78% for EUS versus 91% for MRI. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 25% (1/4) and 50% (2/4) for EUS and MRI respectively. Sensitivity of EUS-FNA for diagnosing a mucinous cyst (positive cytology and/or CEA >192 ng/ml) was 61%. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy (positive cytology) was 1/4 (25%). Interobserver agreement between MRI and EUS for the features was poor to fair. CONCLUSION MRI and EUS are comparable techniques for the morphological characterization of pancreatic cysts. Combined sensitivity of EUS and MRI was higher than the sensitivity of one of the techniques alone. For diagnosing a mucinous cyst, FNA findings showed a low sensitivity, but a high specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer M, de Vries AH, Bossuyt PM, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J. Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography. Radiology 2012; 264:771-8. [PMID: 22771881 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic yields of a radiologist and trained technologists in the detection of advanced neoplasia within a population-based computed tomographic (CT) colonography screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethical approval was obtained from the Dutch Health Council, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Nine hundred eighty-two participants (507 men, 475 women) underwent low-dose CT colonography after noncathartic bowel preparation (iodine tagging) between July 13, 2009, and January 21, 2011. Each scan was evaluated by one of three experienced radiologists (≥800 examinations) by using primary two-dimensional (2D) reading followed by secondary computer-aided detection (CAD) and by two of four trained technologists (≥200 examinations, with colonoscopic verification) by using primary 2D reading followed by three-dimensional analysis and CAD. Immediate colonoscopy was recommended for participants with lesions measuring at least 10 mm, and surveillance was recommended for participants with lesions measuring 6-9 mm. Consensus between technologists was achieved in case of discordant recommendations. Detection of advanced neoplasia (classified by a pathologist) was defined as a true-positive (TP) finding. Relative TP and false-positive (FP) fractions were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Overall, 96 of the 982 participants were referred for colonoscopy and 104 were scheduled for surveillance. Sixty of 84 participants (71%) referred for colonoscopy by the radiologist had advanced neoplasia, compared with 55 of 64 participants (86%) referred by two technologists. Both the radiologist and technologists detected all colorectal cancers (n = 5). The relative TP fraction (for technologists vs radiologist) for advanced neoplasia was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.07), and the relative FP fraction was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.67). CONCLUSION Two technologists serving as a primary reader of CT colonographic images can achieve a comparable sensitivity to that of a radiologist for the detection of advanced neoplasia, with far fewer FP referrals for colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margriet C de Haan
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ziech MLW, Lavini C, Caan MWA, Nio CY, Stokkers PCF, Bipat S, Ponsioen CY, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with luminal Crohn's disease. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3019-27. [PMID: 22749801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2012] [Revised: 03/24/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To prospectively assess dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-)MRI as compared to conventional sequences in patients with luminal Crohn's disease. METHODS Patients with Crohn's disease undergoing MRI and ileocolonoscopy within 1 month had DCE-MRI (3T) during intravenous contrast injection of gadobutrol, single shot fast spin echo sequence and 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo sequence, a dynamic coronal 3D T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient were performed before and after gadobutrol. Maximum enhancement (ME) and initial slope of increase (ISI) were calculated for four colon segments (ascending colon+coecum, transverse colon, descending colon+sigmoid, rectum) and (neo)terminal ileum. C-reactive protein (CRP), Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), per patient and per segment Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) and disease duration were determined. Mean values of the (DCE-)MRI parameters in each segment from each patient were compared between four disease activity groups (normal mucosa, non-ulcerative lesions, mild ulcerative and severe ulcerative disease) with Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni adjustment. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for continuous variables. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included (mean age 37 years; 23 females, median CDEIS 4.4). ME and ISI correlated weakly with segmental CDEIS (r=0.485 and r=0.206) and ME per patient correlated moderately with CDEIS (r=0.551). ME was significantly higher in segments with mild (0.378) or severe (0.388) ulcerative disease compared to normal mucosa (0.304) (p<0.001). No ulcerations were identified at conventional sequences. ME correlated with disease duration in diseased segments (r=0.492), not with CDAI and CRP. CONCLUSIONS DCE-MRI can be used as a method for detecting Crohn's disease ulcerative lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L W Ziech
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Leeuwenburgh MMN, Wiarda BM, Bipat S, Nio CY, Bollen TL, Kardux JJ, Jensch S, Bossuyt PMM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Acute appendicitis on abdominal MR images: training readers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2012; 264:455-63. [PMID: 22700556 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if training with direct feedback helps to improve the diagnostic performance of inexperienced readers in the detection of appendicitis on magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Nine radiologists and eight residents without experience in evaluating MR images for acute abdominal conditions evaluated a training set of images from 100 MR imaging examinations of patients suspected of having appendicitis and received direct feedback after each evaluation. An expert panel made a diagnosis of appendicitis in 45 patients and an alternative diagnosis in 55 patients on the basis of histopathologic examination and follow-up. Readers recorded two diagnoses: the first after viewing images from conventional MR sequences (half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement and true fast imaging with steady-state precession) and the second after viewing diffusion-weighted (DW) MR images. Reader sensitivity and specificity were calculated per set of 25 cases. RESULTS The average reader sensitivity for detecting appendicitis improved significantly after training (0.82 vs 0.92, P = .003); the average specificity improved nonsignificantly (0.82 vs 0.88, P = .10). Sensitivity for radiologists increased from 0.81 in the first set of 25 cases to 0.91 in the last set, and specificity improved from 0.82 to 0.85. For residents, sensitivity increased from 0.82 to 0.94, and specificity increased from 0.82 to 0.91. Sensitivity improved from 0.80 to 0.87 (P < .001) in all readings combined when DW images were read in addition to conventional MR images. CONCLUSION Diagnostic accuracy of inexperienced readers in the evaluation of abdominal MR images for acute appendicitis improved after training with direct feedback, and the addition of DW images improved reader sensitivity.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bipat S, Niekel MC, Comans EFI, Nio CY, Bemelman WA, Verhoef C, Stoker J. Imaging modalities for the staging of patients with colorectal cancer. Neth J Med 2012; 70:26-34. [PMID: 22271811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Dutch guidelines made the following recommendations for staging colorectal cancer (CRC). For liver metastases, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used. For lung metastases, imaging could be limited to chest X-ray. The primary aim of this survey was to summarise the use of imaging modalities and the variation in techniques. Three surveys were created and sent to three groups of medical specialists, namely surgeons, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians. The management survey included questions on the role of different modalities for evaluation of synchronous liver, lung and extrahepatic metastases. The radiological survey included questions concerning the technical aspects of ultrasound (US), CT and MRI. The nuclear medicine survey included questions concerning the technical aspects of FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT. The management and radiological surveys were sent to abdominal surgeons and abdominal radiologists within 88 hospitals and the nuclear medicine survey to specialists within 34 hospitals. Response rates were 75.0% (n=66/88), 77.3% (n=68/88) and 64.7% (n=22/34) for the management, radiological and nuclear medicine surveys, respectively. For liver metastases, the first modality of choice was CT in 52 (78.8%) and US in 12 hospitals (18.2%). Lung metastases were evaluated by either chest X-ray or chest CT and extrahepatic metastases mainly by CT (n=55). In the radiological and nuclear medicine surveys, some variations in techniques of US, CT, MRI , FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT were seen. CT is primarily used for liver and extrahepatic metastases and both chest CT and chest X-ray for lung metastases. There are discrepancies between the survey of daily practice and the present guidelines. Comparative studies on different staging strategies for colon and rectal cancer, including comparing a strategy of CT liver/abdomen versus MRI liver/abdomen for the evaluation of liver and extrahepatic disease and chest X-ray or chest CT for lung metastases would be important for well-founded adjustments of the present guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bipat
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Slaar A, Eshuis WJ, van der Gaag NA, Nio CY, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Reitsma JB, Gouma DJ. Predicting Distant Metastasis in Patients With Suspected Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors for Selective Use of Staging Laparoscopy. World J Surg 2011; 35:2528-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1204-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
34
|
Cauberg ECC, Nio CY, de la Rosette JMCH, Laguna MP, de Reijke TM. Computed tomography-urography for upper urinary tract imaging: is it required for all patients who present with hematuria? J Endourol 2011; 25:1733-40. [PMID: 21851272 DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To define in which patients who present with microscopic or macroscopic hematuria CT urography (CTU) is indicated as an imaging mode for the upper urinary tract (UUT). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective study on consecutive patients who attended a modern protocol-driven hematuria clinic from January 2006 to February 2010. Standard tests (history taking, physical examination, urinalysis via dipstick method, ultrasonography of kidneys and bladder performed by urologists, cystoscopy, and cytology) were directed to all patients, whereas the mode of additional UUT imaging (ultrasonography by a radiologist or four-phase CTU/magnetic resonance (MR) urography (MRU) when CTU was contraindicated) was selected according to a risk factor-based management algorithm. The added value of cross-sectional urography (CTU/MRU) supplementary to ultrasonography (by urologists) to detect renal masses, UUT tumors, and stones was assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis on predictive factors for cross-sectional urography result were performed. RESULTS From the total of 841 patients, lesions that might account for hematuria could not be identified in 462 (54.9%), whereas in 250 (29.7%) and 124 (14.7%) patients, hematuria was from benign and malignant disease, respectively. Cross-sectional urography revealed relevant UUT lesions in 73 of 525 (13.9%) patients. Only result of ultrasonography (odds ratio [OR] 7.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-14.9), P<0.001) and type of hematuria (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.1, P=0.01) were significant predictors for cross-sectional urography result. In 44 of 456 (9.6%) patients with no abnormalities on ultrasonography, CTU/MRU revealed that these were false negatives, with most lesions missed being stones. In 253 of 309 (81.9%) patients with macroscopic hematuria, no lesions were detected in the UUT on CTU/MRU, in contrast to 199 of 216 patients (92.1%) with microscopic hematuria. CONCLUSION For patients who present with microscopic hematuria, ultrasonography is sufficient to exclude significant UUT disease. For patients with macroscopic hematuria, the likelihood of finding UUT disease is higher, and a CTU as a first-line test seems justified.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ziech MLW, Bipat S, Roelofs JJTH, Nio CY, Mearadji B, van Doorn S, Spijkerboer AM, Stoker J. Retrospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging features and histopathology in Crohn's disease patients. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80:e299-305. [PMID: 21295932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2010] [Revised: 12/21/2010] [Accepted: 12/28/2010] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively compare histopathological findings of surgically resected bowel segments with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings on Crohn's disease activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent a MR enterography or enteroclysis before surgery were included after informed consent. MRI features (T1-enhancement, T1 and T2 stratification, T2 signal intensity, bowel wall thickness, presence of ulcerations, comb sign, creeping fat, and disease activity) were assessed by three experienced abdominal radiologists. An acute inflammatory score based on histopathology (parameters: mucosal ulceration, edema, depth and degree of neutrophils) was calculated. Interobserver variability for subjective MRI features was also assessed. RESULTS Thirty-nine segments in 25 patients (mean age 38 years) were included. Of the MRI features, disease activity per segment and bowel wall thickness had a positive association with the acute inflammatory score (p<0.05). T1-enhancement had a positive correlation with disease chronicity. All other MRI features did not have an association with the acute inflammatory score. Interobserver agreement between the three observers was weak to moderate. CONCLUSION MR features bowel wall thickness and disease activity per-segment reflect disease activity in Crohn's disease patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon L W Ziech
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Gouma DJ, van Eijck CHJ, van Heel E, Klass G, Fockens P, Bruno MJ. High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8:806-11. [PMID: 20621679 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 346] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2010] [Revised: 05/16/2010] [Accepted: 05/18/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The prevalence of pancreatic cysts is not known, but asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are diagnosed with increasing frequency. We investigated the prevalence of pancreatic cysts in individuals who were screened by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of a preventive medical examination. METHODS Data from consecutive persons who underwent abdominal MRI (n = 2803; 1821 men; mean age, 51.1 +/- 10.8 y) at an institute of preventive medical care were included from a prospective database. All individuals had completed an application form including questions about possible abdominal complaints and prior surgery. MRI reports were reviewed for the presence of pancreatic cysts. Original image sets of all positive MRI reports and a representative sample of the negative series were re-assessed by a blinded, independent radiologist. RESULTS Pancreatic cysts were reported in 66 persons (2.4%; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-3.0); prevalence correlated with increasing age (P < .001). There was no difference in prevalence between sexes (P = .769). There was no correlation between abdominal complaints and the presence of pancreatic cysts (P = .542). Four cysts (6%) were larger than 2 cm and 3 (5%) were larger than 3 cm. Review of the original image sets by the independent radiologist did not significantly change these findings. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of pancreatic cysts in a large consecutive series of individuals who underwent an MRI at a preventive medical examination was 2.4%. Prevalence increased with age, but did not differ between sexes. Only a minority of cysts were larger than 2 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
de Castro SMM, de Nes LCF, Nio CY, Velseboer DC, Kate FJWT, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Incidence and characteristics of chronic and lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis in patients scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12:15-21. [PMID: 20495640 PMCID: PMC2814399 DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00112.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2009] [Accepted: 07/09/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The determination of the exact nature of a pancreatic head mass in a patient scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy can be very difficult. This is important as patients who suffer from benign disease such as pancreatitis do not always require surgery. The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence of pancreatitis and the signs and symptoms associated with these tumours mistaken for pancreatic cancer and the diagnostic procedures performed. METHODS A consecutive group of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy between 1992 and 2005 with histopathologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) and pancreatitis were analysed. RESULTS The incidence of pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy is 63 out of 639 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (9.9%). Of these patients, 24 patients (38%) had lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and 31 patients (49%) had focal chronic pancreatitis. Eight patients (13%) had an intermediate form with characteristics of both. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma occurred in 227 patients (36%). The presence of pancreatitis without a discrete mass on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) seemed to have clinical relevance with a positive likelihood ratio of 5.1. Mortality after resection was nil in both groups. CONCLUSION The incidence of pancreatitis is 9.9% for patients scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy. Of these patients, 38% had LPSP, 13% had a intermediate form and 49% had focal chronic pancreatitis. The determination of the exact nature of a pancreatic head mass remains difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve MM de Castro
- Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lindsey CF de Nes
- Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Departments of Radiology, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daan C Velseboer
- Departments of Pathology, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fiebo JW Ten Kate
- Departments of Pathology, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier RC Busch
- Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan Gouma
- Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ, Bruno MJ, van der Harst E, Kubben FJGM, Gerritsen JJGM, Greve JW, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IHJT, Klinkenbijl JH, Nio CY, de Castro SMM, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Bosssuyt PMM, Gouma DJ. [Preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head tumours: more complications]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154:A1883. [PMID: 20699038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Niels A van der Gaag
- Academisch Medisch Centrum/Universiteit van Amsterdam, Afd. Heelkunde, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nieuwdorp M, Nio CY, Bartelsman JFWM, Hoekstra JBL. Intermitting umbilical pain, fever and weight loss in an otherwise healthy 65-year-old male. Neth J Med 2009; 67:334-335. [PMID: 19767660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Nieuwdorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radiology and Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre-University, of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
van Randen A, Laméris W, Nio CY, Spijkerboer AM, Meier MA, Tutein Nolthenius C, Smithuis F, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:1394-407. [PMID: 19234705 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2008] [Accepted: 11/08/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The level of inter-observer agreement of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department (ED) was evaluated. Two hundred consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain were prospectively included. Multi-slice CT was performed in all patients with intravenous contrast medium only. Three radiologists independently read all CT examinations. They recorded specific radiological features and a final diagnosis on a case record form. We calculated the proportion of agreement and kappa values, for overall, urgent and frequently occurring diagnoses. The mean age of the evaluated patients was 46 years (range 19-94), of which 54% were women. Overall agreement on diagnoses was good, with a median kappa of 0.66. Kappa values for specific urgent diagnoses were excellent, with median kappa values of 0.84, 0.90 and 0.81, for appendicitis, diverticulitis and bowel obstruction, respectively. Abdominal CT has good inter-observer agreement in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED, with excellent agreement for specific urgent diagnoses as diverticulitis and appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne van Randen
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Published results to date have indicated a good per patient sensitivity of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer and for polyps measuring 10 mm or more together with a very good specificity. Sensitivity and specificity for polyps in the range of 6-10 mm are moderate. These results, however, can be achieved only with meticulous attention to technique including adequate colonic distention, and acquisition of supine and prone thin-section computed tomographic (CT) images. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve involved in the interpretation of CTC studies, with performance statistics improving with operator experience. Radiologists must be comfortable in reporting directly from workstation monitors and have access to and be familiar with software for multiplanar and endoluminal reconstructions. In addition to maximize polyp detection and minimize false positive results, reporting radiologists must have a working knowledge of normal colorectal anatomy and pathology on CTC and be familiar with potential pitfalls in interpretation. Besides the description of several possible causes for perceptive errors, also a literature search of perceptive errors in CTC is included in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Y Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
van Gelder RE, Florie J, Nio CY, Jensch S, de Jager SW, Vos FM, Venema HW, Bartelsman JF, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Laméris JS, Stoker J. A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2006; 17:1181-92. [PMID: 17119975 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0487-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2006] [Revised: 08/28/2006] [Accepted: 09/28/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The aim of our study was to compare primary three-dimensional (3D) and primary two-dimensional (2D) review methods for CT colonography with regard to polyp detection and perceptive errors. CT colonography studies of 77 patients were read twice by three reviewers, first with a primary 3D method and then with a primary 2D method. Mean numbers of true and false positives, patient sensitivity and specificity and perceptive errors were calculated with colonoscopy as a reference standard. A perceptive error was made if a polyp was not detected by all reviewers. Mean sensitivity for large (> or = 10 mm) polyps for primary 3D and 2D review was 81% (14.7/18) and 70%(12.7/18), respectively (p-values > or = 0.25). Mean numbers of large false positives for primary 3D and 2D were 8.3 and 5.3, respectively. With primary 3D and 2D review 1 and 6 perceptive errors, respectively, were made in 18 large polyps (p = 0.06). For medium-sized (6-9 mm) polyps these values were for primary 3D and 2D, respectively: mean sensitivity: 67%(11.3/17) and 61%(10.3/17; p-values > or = 0.45), number of false positives: 33.3 and 15.6, and perceptive errors : 4 and 6 (p = 0.53). No significant differences were found in the detection of large and medium-sized polyps between primary 3D and 2D review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier E van Gelder
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW, Nio CY, Reitsma JB, van Deventer SJ, Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3:1221-8. [PMID: 16361048 DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00853-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown promising results in the detection of Crohn's disease (CD)-related lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of MRI in measuring disease activity in CD patients in comparison with ileocolonoscopy. METHODS Thirty-one patients undergoing ileocolonoscopy because of suspicion of relapsing CD underwent MRI with water as intraluminal contrast medium. At endoscopy, disease severity was graded (4-point scale), and Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) was determined. Two radiologists independently interpreted the MRI scans. Radiologic grading (4-point scale) was compared with endoscopic grading of disease severity and CDEIS (overall, for all segments). Wall thickness and enhancement were compared with CDEIS. Patient experience and preference were determined. RESULTS In, respectively, 14 and 14 patients (radiologist 1) and 16 and 11 patients (radiologist 2) an exact match or 1 level of difference in grading was scored with the endoscopist. Correlation between severity rated at MRI and CDEIS was moderate to strong with r = 0.61 (P < .001) for observer 1 and r = 0.63 (P < .001) for observer 2. Per segment, best correlation was seen in the terminal ileum (r = 0.63; P < .001, for both observers). Wall thickness correlated moderately to strongly with CDEIS (r = 0.57, P < .001 and r = 0.50, P < .001 for observers 1 and 2), whereas enhancement correlated weakly to moderately (r = 0.45, P < .001 and r = 0.42, P < .001). Patients experienced more pain during endoscopy, and all patients except 2 preferred MRI to endoscopy. CONCLUSION MRI can correctly identify disease severity in patients with CD and is a patient-friendly alternative to ileocolonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Florie
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jensch S, van Gelder RE, Florie J, Thomassen-de Graaf MA, Lobé JV, Bossuyt PMM, Bipat S, Nio CY, Stoker J. Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 188:W249-55. [PMID: 17312031 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.06.0451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Multiple trials have documented wide interobserver variability between radiologists interpreting computed tomography colonography (CTC) exams. We sought to determine if nonradiologists could learn to interpret intraluminal findings at CTC with a high degree of sensitivity to determine if they could play a role as second readers in interpreting CTC exams. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven nonradiologists (five medical students, two radiologic technologists) undertook self-directed CTC training using a teaching file of 50 cases; thereafter, each reader blindly interpreted 50 cases with colonoscopic correlation (30 positive, 20 negative). Results were compared with a previously studied cohort of radiologists. The two technologists additionally repeated the exam after 6 weeks of clinical experience. RESULTS The sensitivity of nonradiologists for small (5-9 mm) polyps, large (>9 mm) lesions, and cancers was similar to that of radiologists (0.45 versus 0.63, 0.74 versus 0.71, and 0.80 versus 0.88, respectively). After 6 weeks of clinical experience as second readers, the accuracy of one technologist significantly improved (from 74% to 90%, P = .008), whereas accuracy of the other tended toward improvement (from 74% to 86%%, P = .25). Nonradiologists detected, on average, 6/36 additional polyps (17%) missed by any radiologist, and the sensitivity of 5/7 nonradiologists was significantly greater than at least one of the radiologists (P = .05). CONCLUSION Nonradiologists can perform similarly to radiologists in interpreting intraluminal findings at CTC, with nonradiologist performance improving even after experience with more than 100 cases. Skilled nonradiologists may play a vital role as a second reader of intraluminal findings or by performing quality control of examinations before patient dismissal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Jensch
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, Bartelsman JF, Snel P, De Jager SW, Van Deventer SJ, Laméris JS, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:41-8. [PMID: 15236170 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To date, computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been compared with an imperfect test, colonoscopy, and has been mainly assessed in patients with positive screening test results or symptoms. Therefore, the available data may not apply to screening of patients with a personal or family history of colorectal polyps or cancer (increased risk). We prospectively investigated the ability of CT colonography to identify individuals with large (>or=10 mm) colorectal polyps in consecutive patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. METHODS A total of 249 consecutive patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer underwent CT colonography before colonoscopy. Two reviewers interpreted CT colonography examinations independently. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined after meticulous matching of CT colonography with colonoscopy. Unexplained large false-positive findings were verified with a second-look colonoscopy. RESULTS In total, 31 patients (12%) had 48 large polyps at colonoscopy. This included 8 patients with 8 large polyps that were overlooked initially and detected at the second-look colonoscopy. In 6 of 8 patients, the missed polyp was the only large lesion. With CT colonography, 84% of patients (26/31) with large polyp(s) were identified, paired for a specificity of 92% (200-201/218). Positive and negative predictive values were 59%-60% (26/43-44) and 98% (200-201/205-206), respectively. CT colonography detected 75%-77% (36-37/48) of large polyps, with 9 of the missed lesions being flat. CONCLUSIONS CT colonography and colonoscopy have a similar ability to identify individuals with large polyps in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. The large proportion of missed flat lesions warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier E Van Gelder
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IWO, Schutter MP, van Rijn JC, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bossuyt PMM, Bartelsman JFW, Laméris JS, Stoker J. CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction--comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 2004; 232:611-20. [PMID: 15215541 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322031069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In a feasibility study, the authors compared polyp detection and interobserver variability at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in 15 patients with doses ranging from medium to very low (12.00-0.05 mSv). At levels down to 2% of the medium dose, the mean detection of polyps 5 mm or larger remained at least 74%, while the number of false-positive results decreased and the interobserver agreement remained constant. Initial observations indicate that it is feasible to reduce the radiation dose required for CT colonography. Further studies are needed, however, to investigate the clinical value of very low-dose CT colonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier E van Gelder
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IWO, Florie J, Nio CY, Glas AS, Post FH, Truyen R, Gerritsen FA, Stoker J. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 2003; 228:878-85. [PMID: 12954902 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2283020846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The authors compared a conventional two-directional three-dimensional (3D) display for computed tomography (CT) colonography with an alternative method they developed on the basis of time efficiency and surface visibility. With the conventional technique, 3D ante- and retrograde cine loops were obtained (hereafter, conventional 3D). With the alternative method, six projections were obtained at 90 degrees viewing angles (unfolded cube display). Mean evaluation time per patient with the conventional 3D display was significantly longer than that with the unfolded cube display. With the conventional 3D method, 93.8% of the colon surface came into view; with the unfolded cube method, 99.5% of the colon surface came into view. Sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different between the two methods. Agreements between observers were kappa = 0.605 for conventional 3D display and kappa = 0.692 for unfolded cube display. Consequently, the latter method enhances the 3D endoluminal display with improved time efficiency and higher surface visibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frans M Vos
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bartelsman JFW, Bossuyt PMM, Laméris JS, Stoker J. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002; 224:25-33. [PMID: 12091658 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of polyp detection and the image quality of computed tomographic (CT) colonography at different radiation dose levels and to study effective doses reported in literature on CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS CT colonography and colonoscopy were performed with 100 mAs in 50 consecutive patients at high risk for colorectal cancer; 50- and 30-mAs CT colonographic examinations were simulated with controlled addition of noise to raw transmission measurements. One radiologist randomly evaluated all original and simulated images for the presence of polyps and scored image quality. Differences in image quality were assessed with the Wilcoxon rank test. Scan protocols from the literature and recent (unpublished) updates were collected. RESULTS In nine of 10 patients with polyps 5 mm in diameter or larger (sensitivity, 90%) and in seven of 17 patients with polyps smaller than 5 mm, polyps were correctly identified with CT colonography at all dose levels. Specificity for patients without polyps 5 mm or larger was 53%-60% at all dose levels and for patients without any polyps was 26% (at 100 and 50 mAs) and 48% (at 30 mAs). Image quality decreased significantly as the dose level decreased. The median effective doses (supine and prone positions) calculated from protocols reported in the literature and updates were 7.8 and 8.8 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSION Although image quality decreases significantly at 30 mAs (3.6 mSv), polyp detection remains unimpaired. The median dose for CT colonography at institutions that perform CT colonographic research is currently 8.8 mSv.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier E van Gelder
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The various therapeutic approaches for reflux esophagitis are to increase the competence of the antireflux barrier, to enhance esophageal clearance, to improve gastric emptying and pyloric sphincter competence, to coat damaged tissue, and, especially, to reduce the volume and pH of gastric contents. Of the prokinetic agents, cisapride is the only drug with proven benefit. Single-agent therapy with conventional-dose H2-receptor antagonists or sucralfate results in similar degrees of symptom relief and healing. Post-evening meal (PEM) dosing of H2-receptor antagonists appears to be a rational method of suppressing late evening gastric acidity, but on balance the symptomatic response of twice daily dosing is superior to once daily dosing. More rapid symptom relief and healing are achieved with high-dose H2-receptor antagonists and omeprazole. The significance of sustained a(hypo)chlorhydria remains to be established. To prolong the symptomatic and/or endoscopic remission, the therapy has to be continued long-term with high-dose H2-receptor antagonist, cisapride either alone or in combination with H2-receptor antagonist, or sucralfate with or without H2-receptor antagonist. In the elderly or complicated patient long-term omeprazole may be a justified alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G N Tytgat
- Gastroenterology Dept., University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Besides changes in behaviour and lifestyle we nowadays have the choice of specific drugs in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. A distinction can be made in motility modulating drugs, which stimulate oesophageal peristalsis and LOS pressure, mucosa-protecting drugs, which form a protective layer on the oesophageal mucosa, acid neutralizing (antacids) and acid suppressing drugs (H2-receptor antagonists, omeprazole). So far the results of medical therapy of reflux oesophagitis are still suboptimal. Giving the H2-receptor antagonists with the evening meal would possibly be more appropriate. A valid alternative is the mucosa-protecting agent sucralfate. Monotherapy will probably be insufficient for full healing, which explains why trials of combination therapy (H2-receptor antagonists plus sucralfate or plus cisapride) are being conducted. If omeprazole becomes available, it will revolutionize the therapy of severe reflux oesophagitis. Many questions (dose, duration, maintenance, safety monitoring etc.) remain to be determined.
Collapse
|