Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

Current Applications of PET/MR: Part I: Technical Basics and Preclinical/Clinical Applications

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging has gone through major hardware improvements in recent years, making it a reliable state-of-the-art hybrid modality in clinical practice. At the same time, image reconstruction, attenuation correction, and motion correction algorithms have significantly evolved to provide high-quality images. Part I of the current review discusses technical basics, pre-clinical applications, and clinical applications of PET/MR in radiation oncology and head and neck imaging. PET/MR offers a broad range of advantages in preclinical and clinical imaging. In the preclinic, small and large animal-dedicated devices were developed, making PET/MR capable of delivering new insight into animal models in diseases and facilitating the development of methods that inform clinical PET/MR. Regarding PET/MR's clinical applications in radiation medicine, PET and MR already play crucial roles in the radiotherapy process. Their combination is particularly significant as it can provide molecular and morphological characteristics that are not achievable with other modalities. In addition, the integration of PET/MR information for therapy planning with linear accelerators is expected to provide potentially unique biomarkers for treatment guidance. Furthermore, in clinical applications in the head and neck region, it has been shown that PET/MR can be an accurate modality in head and neck malignancies for staging and resectability assessment. Also, it can play a crucial role in diagnosing residual or recurrent diseases, reliably distinguishing from oedema and fibrosis. PET/MR can furthermore help with tumour characterization and patient prognostication. Lastly, in head and neck carcinoma of unknown origin, PET/MR, with its diagnostic potential, may obviate multiple imaging sessions in the near future.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Innovative Applications

This article provides an overview of the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in various clinical scenarios of head-neck squamous cell carcinoma, ranging from initial staging to treatment-response assessment, and post-therapy follow-up, with a focus on the current evidence, debated issues, and innovative applications. Methodological aspects and the most frequent pitfalls in head-neck imaging interpretation are described. In the initial work-up, 18F-FDG PET/CT is recommended in patients with metastatic cervical lymphadenectomy and occult primary tumor; moreover, it is a well-established imaging tool for detecting cervical nodal involvement, distant metastases, and synchronous primary tumors. Various 18F-FDG pre-treatment parameters show prognostic value in terms of disease progression and overall survival. In this scenario, an emerging role is played by radiomics and machine learning. For radiation-treatment planning, 18F-FDG PET/CT provides an accurate delineation of target volumes and treatment adaptation. Due to its high negative predictive value, 18F-FDG PET/CT, performed at least 12 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, can prevent unnecessary neck dissections. In addition to radiomics and machine learning, emerging applications include PET/MRI, which combines the high soft-tissue contrast of MRI with the metabolic information of PET, and the use of PET radiopharmaceuticals other than 18F-FDG, which can answer specific clinical needs.

Pediatric Imaging Using PET/MR Imaging

PET/MR imaging is a one-stop shop technique for pediatric diseases allowing not only an accurate clinical assessment of tumors at staging and restaging but also the diagnosis of neurologic, inflammatory, and infectious diseases in complex cases. Moreover, applying PET kinetic analyses and sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging as well as quantitative analysis investigating the relationship between disease metabolic activity and cellularity can be applied. Complex radiomics analysis can also be performed.

PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer

Background

The value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for TN staging in head and neck cancer (HNC) has been proven in numerous studies. A few studies have investigated the value of FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of HNC; the combined results indicate potential for FDG-PET/MRI, but the scientific evidence remains weak.

Purpose

To compare performance of FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI for locoregional staging in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Material and Methods

Two radiologists independently of each other retrospectively reviewed primary pre-therapeutic FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examinations from 40 individuals with oropharyngeal carcinomas. TN stage and primary tumor size were noted. The results were compared between observers and modalities and against TN stage set at a multidisciplinary conference.

Results

For nodal staging, PET/MRI had slightly higher specificity and accuracy than PET/CT for the most experienced observer. Both methods demonstrated excellent sensitivity (≥ 0.97 and 1.00, respectively), as well as high negative predictive values (≥ 0.95 and 1.00, respectively). No significant differences were found for tumor staging or measurement of maximum tumor diameter. There was a weak agreement (κ = 0.35–0.49) between PET/CT and PET/MRI for T and N stages for both observers. Inter-observer agreement was higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT, both for tumor staging (κ = 0.57 vs. 0.35) and nodal staging (κ = 0.69 vs. 0.55). The agreement between observers was comparable to the agreement between methods.

Conclusion

PET/MRI may be a viable alternative to PET/CT for locoregional staging (TN staging) and assessment of maximal tumor diameter in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in Detecting Locoregional Recurrence of HNSCC 12 Weeks after the End of Chemoradiotherapy: Single-Center Experience with PET/MRI

Purpose

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the early diagnosis and efficient detection of recurrences and/or residual tumor after treatment play a very important role in patient's prognosis. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) has become an established method for the diagnosis of suspected recurrence in head and neck carcinomas. In particular, integrated PET/MRI imaging that provides optimal soft tissue contrast and less dental implant artifacts compared to PET/CT is an intriguing technique for the follow-up imaging of HNSCC patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in post-treatment follow-up imaging of HNSCC patients.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study consists of 104 patients from our center with histologically confirmed HNSCC. All patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (n = 52) or ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI (n = 52) scan 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Image analysis was performed by two independent readers according to a five-point Likert scale analysis.

Results

PET/MRI was more sensitive (1.00 vs. 0.77) than PET/CT in the detection of locoregional recurrence. PET/MRI also had better negative (1.00 vs. 0.87) predictive values. AUCs for PET/MRI and PET/CT on patient-based analysis were 0.997 (95% CI 0.989–1.000) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.806–0.974), respectively. The comparison of sensitivity, AUCs, and negative predictive values revealed a statistically significant difference, p < 0.05. In PET/CT, false-negative and positive findings were observed in the more advanced disease stages, where PET/MRI performed better. Also, false-negative findings were located in the oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and nasopharyngeal regions, where PET/MRI made no false-negative interpretations.

Conclusion

Based on these results, PET/MRI might be considered the modality of choice in detecting locoregional recurrence in HNSCC patients, especially in the more advanced stages in the oral cavity, larynx, or nasopharynx.

Ultrafast 30-s total-body PET/CT scan: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to explore the diagnostic value of the images obtained in ultrafast 30-s acquisition time by the total-body PET/CT (¹⁸F-FDG injection dose of about 3.7 MBq/kg), and to evaluate whether they can meet the requirements of clinical diagnosis or not.

METHODS

This retrospective study explored the clinical value of ultrafast 30-s ¹⁸F-FDG total-body PET/CT in 88 oncology patients, using the post-surgical pathological diagnosis as the reference standard. The data were acquired over 300 s and reconstructed using all 300-s data (G300) and only the initial 30 s (G30). Two readers independently assessed all images qualitatively and quantitatively. The diagnostic performance was compared between G300 and G30.

RESULTS

The G300 average qualitative score was higher than G30 (P < 0.001). G300 and G30 also differed quantitatively in the liver and mediastinum SUV_max, SD, and SNR (all P < 0.001), but had similar sensitivities (89.09% vs. 86.36%, P = 0.250). The G300 group had higher accuracy (79.73%) and a larger area under the curve (0.709) than G30 (77.70% and 0.695, respectively; all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 30-s total-body PET/CT could meet clinical diagnostic requirements for malignant tumors in patients intolerant to prolonged horizontal positioning.

A Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the Cancer Staging of Locoregional Lymph Nodes

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the yields of 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI) and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) for the detection of metastatic involvement of locoregional neck nodes in patients with head and neck malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients (66 men and 24 women) met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative staging was performed: 53 examinations using PET/CT and 37 using PET/MRI.

RESULTS

For PET/MRI, the study demonstrated a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 64%, positive predictive value of 85%, and negative predictive value of 70%; PET/CT had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity 47%, positive predictive value of 82%, and negative predictive value of 78%.

CONCLUSION

Both methods have a high yield in N-clinical staging with statistically insignificant differences. We assume PET/MRI to be the first-choice method in organ-targeted examinations, for pediatric patients and repeat examinations. In cases of MRI contraindication, PET/CT can be used with no impact on the quality of care.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined PET/CT with MRI, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for detecting synchronous cancer and distant metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC).

Method

A large and growing body of literature has been conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). The researchers collected all accessible literature existing through Cochrane Library (John Wiley & Sons) electronic databases, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), Scopus, and Google Scholar up to June 2020. Analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp LP).

Results

A total of nine studies consisting of 1166 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of combined PET/CT with MRI, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT was 0.92, 0.80, and 0.79, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 0.93, 0.91, and 0.88. The overall prevalence of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas was 9.2% and 11.8%, respectively, with the esophagus (4.6%) being the most common site of synchronous cancer. The most common sites of distant metastases were lung (3%), bone (1.2%), and distant lymph nodes (1.2%), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study showed an approximately similar diagnostic performance for PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for metastasis assessment in advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Performance Evaluation of SimPET-X, a PET Insert for Simultaneous Mouse Total-Body PET/MR Imaging

PURPOSE

In this study, a small animal PET insert (SimPET-X, Brightonix Imaging Inc.) for simultaneous PET/MR imaging studies is presented. This insert covers an 11-cm-long axial field-of-view (FOV) and enables imaging of mouse total-bodies and rat heads.

PROCEDURES

SimPET-X comprises 16 detector modules to yield a ring diameter of 63 mm and an axial FOV of 110 mm. The detector module supports four detector blocks, each comprising two 4 × 4 SiPM arrays coupled with a 20 × 9 array of LSO crystals (1.2 × 1.2 × 10 mm³). The physical characteristics of SimPET-X were measured in accordance with the NEMA NU4-2008 standard protocol. In addition, we assessed the compatibility of SimPET-X with a small animal-dedicated MRI (M7, Aspect Imaging) and conducted phantom and animal studies.

RESULTS

The radial spatial resolutions at the center based on 3D OSEM without and with the warm background were 0.73 mm and 0.99 mm, respectively. The absolute peak sensitivity of the system was 10.44% with an energy window of 100-900 keV and 8.27% with an energy window of 250-750 keV. The peak NECR and scatter fraction for the mouse phantom were 348 kcps at 26.2 MBq and 22.1% with an energy window of 250-750 keV, respectively. The standard deviation of pixel value in the uniform region of an NEMA IQ phantom was 4.57%. The spillover ratios for air- and water-filled chambers were 9.0% and 11.0%, respectively. In the hot-rod phantom image reconstructed using 3D OSEM-PSF, all small rods were resolved owing to the high spatial resolution of the SimPET-X system. There was no notable interference between SimPET-X and M7 MRI. SimPET-X provided high-quality mouse images with superior spatial resolution, sensitivity, and counting rate performance.

CONCLUSION

SimPET-X yielded a remarkably improved sensitivity and NECR compared with SimPET^TM.

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of combined positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters provided by simultaneous 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with locally advanced OHSCC who underwent simultaneous FDG PET/MRI before (chemo)radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Peak standardized uptake value (SULpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesion were obtained on PET data. On MRI scans, primary tumor size, diffusion and perfusion parameters were assessed using pre-contrast and high-resolution post-contrast images. Ratios between metabolic/metabolo-volumetric parameters and ADC were calculated. Comparisons between groups were performed by Student's t test. Survival analysis was performed by univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Overall survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Survivors were censored at the time of the last clinical control. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 31.4 ± 21 months), there were 15 deaths. Univariate analysis shows that SULpeak and SULpeak/ADCmean were significant predictors of overall survival (OS). At multivariate analysis, only SULpeak remained a significant predictor of OS. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that patients with higher SULpeak had poorer outcome compared to those with lower values (HR: 3.7, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Pre-therapy SULpeak of the primary site was predictive of overall survival in patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between [18F]FDG PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI in T staging for oral tongue cancer

OBJECTIVE

Integrated PET/MRI with [¹⁸F]FDG is advantageous in that it enables simultaneous PET and MR imaging with higher soft-tissue contrast, multiplanar image acquisition, and functional imaging capability without using fat suppression and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). The aims of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI for assessing the extent of the primary tumor (T) in oral tongue cancer (OTC) based on the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI (ceMRI).

METHODS

18 patients with biopsy-proven operable OTC underwent preoperative regional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI within 2 weeks. For [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI, rainbow-colored PET images were overlaid on the corresponding MR images. Tumor size and the depth of invasion (DOI) were visually measured on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI. The size, DOI, and clinical T stage were evaluated using the final surgical pathology as the reference.

RESULTS

Of the 18 OTCs, one was not detected by ceMRI due to metal artifacts from an artificial denture, and another due to superficial type (pathological DOI = 0 mm). Tumor sizes measured by ceMRI and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI had significant positive correlations with the pathological size (r = 0.80 and r = 0.90, respectively), and DOIs measured by ceMRI and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI had significant positive correlations with the pathological DOI (r = 0.74 and r = 0.64, respectively). The means ± SD of size (mm) were 20.4 ± 9.1, 22.9 ± 10.9, and 26.2 ± 10.0, and those of DOI (mm) were 7.1 ± 2.5, 6.9 ± 2.2, and 5.8 ± 3.2 for ceMRI, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI, and pathology, respectively. A significant difference was observed in tumor size between ceMRI and pathology (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed between any other sizes, DOIs, or T stages. The accuracy for T status was 72% (13/18 including 2 undetectable cases) for ceMRI and 89% (16/18) for [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Although shallow DOIs are often overestimated, regional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI without fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement is comparable to and may be substituted for ceMRI in preoperative T staging for OTC patients, reducing metal artifacts and avoiding the adverse effects of GBCAs.

Are Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Sequences Needed in Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for Tumor Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

PET/MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG has demonstrated the advantages of simultaneous PET and MR imaging in head and neck cancer imaging, MRI allowing excellent soft-tissue contrast, while PET provides metabolic information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences in the tumor delineation of head and neck cancers on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous head and neck ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging staging or restaging followed by surgery were retrospectively included. Local tumor invasion and lymph node extension were assessed in 45 head and neck anatomic regions using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging by 2 rater groups (each one including a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician). Two reading sessions were performed, one without contrast-enhanced sequences (using only T1WI, T2WI, and PET images) and a second with additional T1WI postcontrast sequences. The results were compared with the detailed histopathologic analysis, used as reference standard. The κ concordance coefficient between the reading sessions and sensitivity and specificity for each region were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. There was excellent agreement between the contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions in delineating precise tumor extension in the 45 anatomic regions studied (Cohen κ = 0.96, 95% CI = [0.94-0.97], P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy did not differ between contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions, being 0.97 for both groups and both reading sessions. For the 2 rater groups, there was good sensitivity for both contrast-free (0.83 and 0.85) and postgadolinium reading sessions (0.88 and 0.90, respectively). Moreover, there was excellent specificity (0.98) for both groups and reading sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadolinium chelate contrast administration showed no added value for accurate characterization of head and neck primary tumor extension and could possibly be avoided in the PET/MR imaging head and neck workflow.

Clinical PET/MR

Oncologic imaging has been a major focus of clinical research on PET/MR over the last 10 years. Studies so far have shown that PET/MR with ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) overall provides a similar accuracy for tumor staging as FDG PET/CT. The effective radiation dose of whole-body FDG PET/MR is more than 50% lower than for FDG PET/CT, making PET/MR particularly attractive for imaging of children. However, the longer acquisition times and higher costs have so far limited broader clinical use of PET/MR technology for whole-body staging. With the currently available technology, PET/MR appears more promising for locoregional staging of diseases for which MR is the anatomical imaging modality of choice. These include brain tumors, head and neck cancers, gynecologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. For instance, PET imaging with ligands of prostate-specific membrane antigen, combined with multi-parametric MR, appears promising for detection of prostate cancer and differentiation from benign prostate pathologies as well as for detection of local recurrences. The combination of functional parameters from MR, such as apparent diffusion coefficients, and molecular parameters from PET, such as receptor densities or metabolic rates, is feasible in clinical studies, but clinical applications for this multimodal and multi-parametric imaging approach still need to be defined.

PET/MR in Head and Neck Cancer - An Update

In academic centers, PET/MR has taken the road to clinical nuclear medicine in the past 6 years since the last review on its applications in head and neck cancer patients in this journal. Meanwhile, older sequential PET + MR machines have largely vanished from clinical sites, being replaced by integrated simultaneous PET/MR scanners. Evidence from several studies suggests that PET/MR overall performs equally well as PET/CT in the staging and restaging of head and neck cancer and in radiation therapy planning. PET/MR appears to offer advantages in the characterization and prognostication of head and neck malignancies through multiparametric imaging, which demands an exact preparation and validation of imaging modalities, however. The majority of available clinical PET/MR studies today covers FDG imaging of squamous cell carcinoma arising from a broad spectrum of locations in the upper aerodigestive tract. In the future, specific PET/MR studies are desired that address specific histopathological tumor entities, nonepithelial malignancies, such as major salivary gland tumors, squamous cell carcinomas arising in specific locations, and malignancies imaged with non-FDG radiotracers. With the advent of digital PET/CT scanners, PET/MR is expected to partake in future technical developments, such as novel iterative reconstruction techniques and deviceless motion correction for respiration and gross movement in the head and neck region. Owing to the still comparably high costs of PET/MR scanners and facility requirements on the one hand, and the concentration of multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment mainly at academic centers on the other hand, a more widespread use of this imaging modality outside major hospitals is currently limited.

Comparative Study Between Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the T and N Staging of Hypopharyngeal Cancer: An Initial Result

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for T and N staging of hypopharyngeal cancer.

METHODS

Integrated PET/MR and PET/CT examinations were performed in 20 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer after same-day single injection. Eleven of 20 patients underwent surgery with histologic findings directly compared with imaging findings. Statistical analysis included Spearman correlation and McNemar test.

RESULTS

Accuracy of PET/MR, PET/CT, and MRI for T staging was 81.8%, 63.6%, and 72.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic lymph nodes was 88.2% and 98.2% on PET/MR, 76.5% and 98.3% on PET/CT, and 64.7% and 94.7% on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The PET/MR and PET/CT provide comparable results for assessing hypopharyngeal carcinoma and detecting metastatic lymph nodes.

Preliminary clinical results for PET/MR compared with PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The present study aimed to assess the performance of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) for the visualization and characterization of lesions. In addition, the present study investigated whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters exhibited any significant correlation with standardized uptake values (SUV) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 35 patients with NPC underwent whole body PET-computed tomography (CT) and head and neck MR imaging (MRI) scans using the PET/CT-MRI system. Image quality, lesion conspicuity and the diagnostic confidence of PET/CT, T1 weighted (T1w) PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging were assessed. The true diffusion coefficient (D), the pseudo-diffusion coefficient or diffusion within the microcirculation (D*), and the perfusion fraction or the contribution of water moving in the capillaries (f), and ADC, were calculated. The correlation between the ADC, D*, D and f values and the SUV were analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis. Similar image quality was obtained using PET/CT, T1w PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging. However, the T1w PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging were more effective than PET/CT in analyzing the lesion conspicuity of the primary tumors and lymph nodes. In addition, T2w PET/MR imaging was more efficient than T1w PET/MR imaging in analyzing primary tumors and lymph nodes. Pearson's correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between the SUV and ADC, and D*, D and f values in NPC. The present results suggested that the application of PET/MR is feasible and could serve as a reliable alternative to PET/CT, while SUV and ADC, D*, D and f values were identified as independent biomarkers in NPC.

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this prospective study, we sought to compare the clinical utility of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT in the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC).

METHODS

We examined 198 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven OHSCC who agreed to receive chemoradiation. All patients underwent pretreatment PET/MRI and PET/CT on the same day. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months or until death. The McNemar's test and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare sensitivity/specificity and the diagnostic capabilities of PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients (27.7%) who had synchronous cancers and/or distant metastases (number of involved sites: 83). The results of site-based analysis revealed that the sensitivity of PET/MRI was 15.7% higher than that of MRI (73.5% versus 57.8%, p < 0.001) and 3.6% higher compared with PET/CT (73.5% versus 69.9%, p = 0.083), whereas the sensitivity of PET/CT was 12.1% higher than that of MRI (69.9% versus 57.8%, p = 0.012). On a patient-basis, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PET/MRI yielded a greater area under curve than MRI (0.930 versus 0.905, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences in terms of diagnostic capability between MRI and PET/CT (0.905 versus 0.917, p = 0.469) and between PET/MRI and PET/CT (0.930 versus 0.917, p = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, PET/MRI showed a significantly higher diagnostic capability than MRI and no significant difference compared with PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers or distant metastases in patients with OHSCC.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Advanced Glottic Cancer: A Tool for Clinical Decision in Comparison with Conventional Imaging

This study assessed the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT (PET/CT) to detect the cartilage and paraglottic infiltration in advanced glottic cancer comparing the results with those of conventional imaging (CI) (contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance). In addition, we assessed the prognostic value of quantitative parameters, measured on baseline PET/CT, in terms of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients with glottic squamous cell carcinoma stage III and IVA, treated in our institute between 2010 and 2016, comparing PET/CT, performed for staging and radiotherapy planning, and CI findings. Cohen's K was used to compare concordance between PET/CT and CI. Imaging findings were correlated with endoscopic evaluation and histological reports (gold standard (GS)). All lesions shown by CI were also detected by PET/CT imaging, and in 5 cases, a better definition of local infiltration was achieved with PET/CT than CI (5 CT). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT and CT were 95%, 86%, and 93% and 70%, 86%, and 74% for, respectively. MRI showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%. One false-negative (FN) cases and 1 false-positive (FP) case were observed with PET/CT with no difference compared to MRI (10 cases). Six FN cases and 1 FP case were observed with CT. Cohen's K was 0.60 (PET vs. CI) and 0.80 (PET vs. GS). Patients were followed-up for at least 24 months to calculate EFS and OS. 13 local recurrence and 7 deaths were recorded. Among quantitative PET parameters, baseline MTV was the most powerful predictor of outcome. Our data suggest a reliable sensitivity and accuracy of PET/CT in the evaluation of local extension, proving a useful method for initial local staging in addition to the well-established role in lymph-node and distant sites assessment. Furthermore, pretreatment MTV provides better prognostic information than other PET/CT parameters.

Hybrid PET/MRI in major cancers: a scoping review

PURPOSE

PET/MRI was introduced for clinical use in 2011 and is now an established modality for the imaging of brain and certain pelvic cancers, whereas clinical use for the imaging of other forms of cancer is not yet widespread. We therefore systematically investigated what has been published on the use of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in the imaging of cancers outside the brain, focusing on clinical areas of application related to diagnosis, staging and restaging.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of simultaneous PET/MRI in cancer patients were chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 3,138 publications were identified and 116 published during the period 2012-2018 were included and were grouped according to the major cancer forms: 13 head and neck (HNC), 9 breast (BC), 21 prostate (PC), 14 gynaecological, 13 gastrointestinal (GIC), and 46 various cancers. Data from studies comparing PET/MRI and PET/CT for staging/restaging suggested the superiority of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for the detection of tumour extension and retropharyngeal lymph node metastases in nasopharyngeal cancer, and for the detection of liver metastases and possibly bone marrow metastases in high-risk BC. FDG PET/MRI tended to be inferior for the detection of lung metastases in HNC and BC. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was superior to PET/CT for the detection of local PC recurrence. FDG PET/MRI was superior to FDG PET/CT for the detection of local tumour invasion in cervical cancer and had higher accuracy for the detection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The scoping review methodology resulted in the identification of a huge number of records, of which less than 5% were suitable for inclusion and only a limited number allowed conclusions on the advantages/disadvantages of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in the oncological setting. There was evidence to support the use of FDG PET/MRI in staging of nasopharyngeal cancer and high-risk BC. Preliminary data indicate the superiority of PET/MRI for the detection of local recurrence in PC, local tumour invasion in cervical cancer, and liver metastases in colorectal cancer. These conclusions are based on small datasets and need to be further explored.

PET/MRI vs PET/CT in Head and Neck Imaging: When, Why, and How?

The increasing availability of hybrid PET/MRI systems has led to a breadth of new publications and opportunities for use of PET/MRI. While PET/CT has been a valuable tool for oncologic staging, including head and neck malignancy, there are several theoretical and practical advantages a PET/MRI system would have over PET/CT in head and neck imaging. This review article discusses the established role of PET/CT, early evidence for the role of PET/MRI, and protocol considerations for both PET/CT and PET/MRI as they apply to head and neck imaging.

Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI as a single-step imaging modality in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Both head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) play a crucial role in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this study, we sought to prospectively investigate the clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for primary staging of NPC patients.

METHODS

We examined 113 patients with histologically confirmed NPC who underwent pretreatment, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI and PET/CT for primary tumor staging. The images obtained with the different imaging modalities were interpreted independently and compared with each other.

RESULTS

PET/MRI increased the accuracy of head and neck MRI for assessment of primary tumor extent in four patients via addition of FDG uptake information to increase the conspicuity of morphologically subtle lesions. PET/MR images were more discernible than PET/CT images for mapping tumor extension, especially intracranial invasion. Regarding the N staging assessment, the sensitivity of PET/MRI (99.5%) was higher than that of head and neck MRI (94.2%) and PET/CT (90.9%). PET/MRI was particularly useful for distinguishing retropharyngeal nodal metastasis from adjacent nasopharyngeal tumors. For distant metastasis evaluation, PET/MRI exhibited a similar sensitivity (90% vs. 86.7% vs. 83.3%), but higher positive predictive value (93.1% vs. 78.8% vs. 83.3%) than whole-body MRI and PET/CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For tumor staging of NPC, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI was more accurate than head and neck MRI and PET/CT, and may serve as a single-step staging modality.

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Applications and Future Directions

Clinical PET/MR imaging is being implemented at institutions worldwide as part of the standard-of-care imaging for select oncology patients. This article focuses on oncologic applications of PET/MR imaging in cancers of the head and neck. Although current published literature is relatively sparse, the potential benefits of a hybrid modality of PET/MR imaging are discussed along with several possible areas of research. With the increasing number of PET/MR imaging scanners in clinical use and ongoing research, the role of PET/MR imaging in the management of head and neck cancer is likely to become more evident in the near future.

PET/CT and PET/MRI in head and neck malignancy

Combined 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has an established role in the staging of difficult cases of head and neck (HN) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), looking for an unknown primary, assessing response post-chemotherapy at 3-6 months, and differentiating relapse from treatment effects in patients suspected to have tumour recurrence. The PET NECK trial, comparing PET/CT surveillance versus neck dissection in advanced head and neck cancer showed survival was similar among patients who underwent PET/CT-guided surveillance and those who underwent planned neck dissection, but surveillance was more cost-effective. There is growing interest in the use of hypoxia PET tracers, especially in targeting radiotherapy, where the radiotherapy dose can be boosted in regions of hypoxia; the use of 68Ga peptide tracers in neuroendocrine malignancy and also in the growing field of combined PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PET/MRI has the advantage of increased anatomical detail and radiation dose reduction combined with the molecular and metabolic data from PET, although PET/CT has the advantage in better sensitivity for imaging lung metastases. Thus far, there is good agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI with high correlation between semi-quantitative measurements in primary, nodal, osseous, and soft-tissue lesions imaging. PET/MRI may indeed provide greater accuracy than the currently available imaging procedures in the staging and later treatment response evaluation in HNSCC.

Chapter 8 On the Horizon: Advanced Imaging Techniques to Improve Noninvasive Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes

Conventional imaging modalities are limited in the evaluation of lymph nodes as they predominantly rely on size and morphology, which have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity for malignancy. In this review we will explore the role of "on the horizon" advanced imaging modalities that can look beyond the size and morphologic features of a cervical lymph node and explore its molecular nature and can aid in personalizing therapy rather than use the "one-size-fits-all" approach.

[Molecular imaging of head and neck cancers : Perspectives of PET/MRI]

BACKGROUND

The (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) procedure is a cornerstone in the diagnostics of head and neck cancers. Several years ago PET-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) also became available as an alternative hybrid multimodal imaging method.

OBJECTIVE

Does PET/MRI have advantages over PET/CT in the diagnostics of head and neck cancers?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The diagnostic accuracy of the standard imaging methods CT, MRI and PET/CT is depicted according to currently available meta-analyses and studies concerning the use of PET/MRI for these indications are summarized.

RESULTS

In all studies published up to now PET/MRI did not show superiority regarding the diagnostic accuracy in head and neck cancers; however, there is some evidence that in the future PET/MRI can contribute to tumor characterization and possibly be used to predict tumor response to therapy with the use of multiparametric imaging.

CONCLUSION

Currently, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT is not outperformed by PET/MRI in the diagnostics of head and neck cancers. The additive value of PET/MRI due to the use of multiparametric imaging needs to be investigated in future research.

Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) compared with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the characterization of incidental tracer uptake in examinations of the head and neck.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 81 oncologic patients who underwent contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI was performed by two readers for incidental tracer uptake. In a consensus reading, discrepancies were resolved. Each finding was either characterized as most likely benign, most likely malignant, or indeterminate. Using all available clinical information including results from histopathologic sampling and follow-up examinations, an expert reader classified each finding as benign or malignant. McNemar's test was used to compare the performance of both imaging modalities in characterizing incidental tracer uptake.

RESULTS

Forty-six lesions were detected by both modalities. On PET/CT, 27 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one as most likely malignant, and 18 as indeterminate; on PET/MRI, 31 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one lesion as most likely malignant, and 14 as indeterminate. Forty-three lesions were benign and one lesion was malignant according to the reference standard. In two lesions, a definite diagnosis was not possible. McNemar's test detected no differences concerning the correct classification of incidental tracer uptake between PET/CT and PET/MRI (P = 0.125).

CONCLUSION

In examinations of the head and neck area, incidental tracer uptake cannot be classified more accurately by PET/MRI than by PET/CT.

Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after radio(chemo)therapy: Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (FDG-PET/DWIMRI) for detection and local staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after radio(chemo)therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study that included 74 consecutive patients with previous radio(chemo)therapy for HNSCC and in whom tumour recurrence or radiation-induced complications were suspected clinically. The patients underwent hybrid PET/MRI examinations with morphological MRI, DWI and FDG-PET. Experienced readers blinded to clinical/histopathological data evaluated images according to established diagnostic criteria taking into account the complementarity of multiparametric information. The standard of reference was histopathology with whole-organ sections and follow-up ≥24 months. Statistical analysis considered data clustering.

RESULTS

The proof of diagnosis was histology in 46/74 (62.2%) patients and follow-up (mean ± SD = 34 ± 8 months) in 28/74 (37.8%). Thirty-eight patients had 43 HNSCCs and 46 patients (10 with and 36 without tumours) had 62 benign lesions/complications. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of PET/DWIMRI were 97.4%, 91.7%, 92.5% and 97.1% per patient, and 93.0%, 93.5%, 90.9%, and 95.1% per lesion, respectively. Agreement between imaging-based and pathological T-stage was excellent (kappa = 0.84, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/DWIMRI yields excellent results for detection and T-classification of HNSCC after radio(chemo)therapy.

KEY POINTS

• FDG-PET/DWIMRI yields excellent results for the detection of post-radio(chemo)therapy HNSCC recurrence. • Prospective one-centre study showed excellent agreement between imaging-based and pathological T-stage. • 97.5% of positive concordant MRI, DWI and FDG-PET results correspond to recurrence. • 87% of discordant MRI, DWI and FDG-PET results correspond to benign lesions. • Multiparametric FDG-PET/DWIMRI facilitates planning of salvage surgery in the irradiated neck.

Diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) for gynecological cancers of the pelvis, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search of Pubmed and Embase for studies that evaluated the diagnosis of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for gynecological malignancies in the pelvis. Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 (QUADAS 2) tool was used to access the quality of included studies. After testing heterogeneity of the pooled studies with I^2 and H^2 (calculated using metaan in Stata12.0) we treated the data that extracted and transformation from the studies, based on DerSimonian-Laird method(Random-effects models),then back-transformation them to percentages and plotting to get the pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve.

RESULTS

Eventually, 7 studies fulfilled our predefined inclusion criteria were included in our research. On patient-based assessment, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for diagnosis of gynecological malignancies were 0.95 (95%CI 0.86-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI 0.74-1.00), 7.51 (95% CI 2.29-24.59), 0.12 (95% CI 0.05-0.29) and 116.27 (95% CI 17.07-791.74), respectively. On lesion-based assessment, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and the summary DOR were 0.89 (95%CI 0.84-0.93), 0.87 (95%CI 0.74-0.95), 6.99 (95%CI 3.30-14.79), 0.12 (95%CI 0.06-0.25) and 55.82 (95%CI 20.91-149.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that 18F-FDG PET/MRI, combined the advantages of MRI and PET, may be a very promising diagnostic method to assess the primary tumor and nodal staging in patients with gynecological malignancies of the pelvis.

Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the clinical performance of integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR as compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oncologic imaging.

METHODS

The literature was searched using MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID. Studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging/restaging, assessment of treatment response, or evaluation of metastasis in patients with suspected or diagnosed cancers were deemed eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the studies was rated favorably with bias or applicability concerns in a few studies. Our review suggests that ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR performs comparably to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of local lymph node and distant metastases and superiorly in determining the local extent of tumor. SUV obtained from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR correlated highly with those obtained from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on early evidence, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR is comparable to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical scenarios examined in this review. The potential for interchangeability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT will vary by indication and the body site that is being imaged, with PET scanners integrated with MRI predicted to provide greater detail in the evaluation of local tumor extent, where ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be limited.

Evaluation of PET/MRI for Tumor Volume Delineation for Head and Neck Cancer

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT), combined positron emitted tomography and CT (PET/CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in head and neck radiation planning. Hybrid PET/MRI has garnered attention for potential added value in cancer staging and treatment planning. Herein, we compare PET/MRI vs. planning CT for head and neck cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation.

Material and methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation to 60–70 Gy using IMRT. We performed pretreatment contrast-enhanced planning CT and gadolinium-enhanced PET/MRI. Primary and nodal volumes were delineated on planning CT (GTV-CT) prospectively before treatment and PET/MRI (GTV-PET/MRI) retrospectively after treatment. GTV-PET/MRI was compared to GTV-CT using separate rigid registrations for each tumor volume. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric evaluating spatial overlap and modified Hausdorff distance (mHD) evaluating mean orthogonal distance difference were calculated. Minimum dose to 95% of GTVs (D95) was compared.

Results

Eleven patients were evaluable (10 oropharynx, 1 larynx). Nine patients had evaluable primary tumor GTVs and seven patients had evaluable nodal GTVs. Mean primary GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 13.2 and 14.3 cc, with mean intersection 8.7 cc, DSC 0.63, and mHD 1.6 mm. D95 was 65.3 Gy for primary GTV-CT vs. 65.2 Gy for primary GTV-PET/MRI. Mean nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 19.0 and 23.0 cc, with mean intersection 14.4 cc, DSC 0.69, and mHD 2.3 mm. D95 was 62.3 Gy for both nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI.

Conclusion

In this series of patients with head and neck (primarily oropharynx) cancer, PET/MRI and CT-GTVs had similar volumes (though there were individual cases with larger differences) with overall small discrepancies in spatial overlap, small mean orthogonal distance differences, and similar radiation doses.

PET+MR versus PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer, using a trimodality PET/CT+MR system

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET+MR with PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Contrast-enhanced PET/CT+MR was performed in 27 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. PET/CT and PET+MR were evaluated separately, and the TNM stage and factors influencing treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

The TNM staging by PET+MR was comparable to PET/CT (T: p=0.331, N: p=0.453, M: p=0.034). The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of treatment-influencing factors by PET/CT and PET+MR were 0.68/0.99/0.97, and 1.00/1.00/0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body staging with PET+MR yields at least equal diagnostic accuracy as PET/CT in head and neck cancer.

Simultaneous PET/MRI vs PET/CT in oncology. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of simultaneous PET/MRI in oncology compared with that of PET/CT, based upon the available evidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the Medline and Embase databases to identify original clinical articles published up to 21 January 2016, in order to compare simultaneous PET/MRI and PET/CT in oncology patients.

RESULTS

A total of 57 articles were obtained that included various diseases: head and neck cancer (5), lung cancer and lung nodules (13), colorectal cancer (1), liver lesions (2), abdominal incidentalomas (1), neuroendocrine tumours (2), thyroid carcinoma (2), breast cancer (3), gynaecological cancer (2), prostate cancer (4), lymphoma (2), multiple myeloma (1), bone metastases (3), intracranial tumours (2), paediatric oncology (1) and various tumours (13). Diagnostic performance of simultaneous PET/MRI was similar or even better to that of PET/CT in most oncological diseases. However, PET/CT was superior for small lung nodule detection.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous PET/MRI in oncology is feasible, performing at least equally as well as PET/CT, with lower radiation exposure. However, available evidence is still limited. Studies including more patients and tumours are needed to establish PET/MRI indications and to identify appropriate protocols for each disease.

Initial Experience of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Morphologic, Functional, and Metabolic Biomarkers

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of morphologic, functional, and metabolic biomarkers acquired concurrently at PET/MRI in patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 1 year, 9 patients with suspected thymic epithelial tumors at contrast-enhanced chest CT were prospectively enrolled and underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/MRI. Two chest radiologists prospectively reviewed the CT and MRI scans of PET/MRI in consensus, and 2 nuclear physicians reviewed the PET images. Visual assessment of the tumor morphology, functional biomarkers such as apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted images, and metabolic biomarkers (including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis, and heterogeneity index) were recorded. All patients underwent operation, and their pathologic reports served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Thymic epithelial tumors were demonstrated in all 9 patients at pathologic examination. Tumor contour (P = 0.012) and shape (P = 0.033) had an association with the World Health Organization subtype, and the presence of septum (P = 0.048) on MRI scans had an association with the Masaoka stage. In terms of functional and metabolic biomarkers, SUVmax (ρ = 0.683, P = 0.042) and SUV/apparent diffusion coefficient (ρ = 0.703, P = 0.035) correlated with the Masaoka stage. Metabolic tumor volume (P = 0.024), heterogeneity index (P = 0.024), and total lesion glycolysis (P = 0.048) were useful for classification between low- and high-risk thymic epithelial tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by the small number of patients enrolled, morphologic, functional, and metabolic biomarkers derived from PET/MRI scans were useful for the stratification of thymic epithelial tumors.

Simultaneous (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI: Associations between diffusion, glucose metabolism and histopathological parameters in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To analyze possible associations between functional simultaneous (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging parameters and histopathological parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

11 patients (2 female, 9 male; mean age 56.0years) with biopsy-proven primary HNSCC underwent simultaneous (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI with a dedicated head and neck protocol including diffusion weighted imaging. For each tumor, glucose metabolism was estimated with standardized uptake values (SUV) and diffusion restriction was calculated using apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC). The tumor proliferation index was estimated on Ki 67 antigen stained specimens. Cell count, total nucleic area, and average nucleic area were estimated in each case. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze possible associations between the estimated parameters.

RESULTS

The mean SUVmax value was 24.41±6.51, and SUVmean value 15.01±4.07. Mean values (×10(-3)mm(2)s(-1)) of ADC parameters were as follows: ADCmin: 0.65±0.20; ADCmean: 1.28±0.18; and ADCmax: 2.16±0.35. Histopathological analysis identified the following results: cell count 1069.82±388.66, total nucleic area 150771.09±61177.12μm(2), average nucleic area 142.90±57.27μm(2) and proliferation index 49.09±22.67%. ADCmean correlated with Ki 67 level (r=-0.728, p=0.011) and total nucleic area (r=-0.691, p=0.019) and tended to correlate with average nucleic area (r=-0.527, p=0.096). ADCmax correlated with Ki 67 level (r=-0.633, p=0.036). SUVmax also tended to correlate with average nucleic area (r=0.573, p=0.066). Combined parameter SUVmax/ADCmin correlated with average nucleic area (r=0.627, p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

ADC and SUV values showed significant correlations with different histopathological parameters and can be used as biological markers in HNSCC.

Diagnostic Performance of Whole-Body PET/MRI for Detecting Malignancies in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background

As an evolving imaging modality, PET/MRI is preliminarily applied in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI for tumor staging in patients with various types of cancer.

Methods

Relevant articles about PET/MRI for cancer staging were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO and the Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality using the QUADAS tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated per patient and per lesion. The summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) and Q* estimates were obtained.

Results

A total of 38 studies that involved 753 patients and 4234 lesions met the inclusion criteria. On a per-patient level, the pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.93 (0.90–0.95) and 0.92 (0.89–0.95), respectively. On a per-lesion level, the corresponding estimates were 0.90 (0.88–0.92) and 0.95 (0.94–0.96), respectively. The pooled PLR, NLR and DOR estimates were 6.67 (4.83–9.19), 0.12 (0.07–0.21) and 75.08 (42.10–133.91) per patient and 10.91 (6.79–17.54), 0.13 (0.08–0.19) and 102.53 (59.74–175.97) per lesion, respectively.

Conclusion

According to our results, PET/MRI has excellent diagnostic potential for the overall detection of malignancies in cancer patients. Large, multicenter and prospective studies with standard scanning protocols are required to evaluate the diagnostic value of PET/MRI for individual cancer types.

FDG Whole-Body PET/MRI in Oncology: a Systematic Review

The recent advance in hybrid imaging techniques enables offering simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in various clinical fields. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET has been widely used for diagnosis and evaluation of oncologic patients. The growing evidence from research and clinical experiences demonstrated that PET/MRI with FDG can provide comparable or superior diagnostic performance more than conventional radiological imaging such as computed tomography (CT), MRI or PET/CT in various cancers. Combined analysis using structural information and functional/molecular information of tumors can draw additional diagnostic information based on PET/MRI. Further studies including determination of the diagnostic efficacy, optimizing the examination protocol, and analysis of the hybrid imaging results is necessary for extending the FDG PET/MRI application in clinical oncology.

PET/MR in cancers of the head and neck

One early application of PET/MRI in clinical practice may be the imaging of head and neck cancers. This is because the morphologic imaging modalities, CT and MR, are recognized as similarly effective tools in cross-sectional oncological imaging of the head and neck. The addition of PET with FDG is believed to enhance the accuracy of both modalities to a similar degree. However, there are a few specific scenarios in head and neck cancer imaging where MR is thought to provide an edge over CT, including perineural spread of tumors and the infiltration of important anatomical landmarks, such as the prevertebral fascia and great vessel walls. Here, hybrid PET/MR might provide higher diagnostic certainty than PET/CT or a separate acquisition of PET/CT and MR. Another advantage of MR is the availability of several functional techniques. Although some of them might enhance the imaging of head and neck cancer with PET/MR, other functional techniques actually might prove dispensable in the presence of PET. In this overview, we discuss current trends and potential clinical applications of PET/MR in the imaging of head and neck cancers, including clinical protocols. We also discuss potential benefits of implementing functional MR techniques into hybrid PET/MRI of head and neck cancers.

Combined PET/MR: The Real Work Has Just Started. Summary Report of the Third International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 17-21, 2014, Tübingen, Germany

This paper summarises the proceedings and discussions at the third annual workshop held in Tübingen, Germany, dedicated to the advancement of the technical, scientific and clinical applications of combined PET/MRI systems in humans. Two days of basic scientific and technical instructions with "hands-on" tutorials were followed by 3 days of invited presentations from active researchers in this and associated fields augmented by round-table discussions and dialogue boards with specific themes. These included the use of PET/MRI in paediatric oncology and in adult neurology, oncology and cardiology, the development of multi-parametric analyses, and efforts to standardise PET/MRI examinations to allow pooling of data for evaluating the technology. A poll taken on the final day demonstrated that over 50 % of those present felt that while PET/MRI technology underwent an inevitable slump after its much-anticipated initial launch, it was now entering a period of slow, progressive development, with new key applications emerging. In particular, researchers are focusing on exploiting the complementary nature of the physiological (PET) and biochemical (MRI/MRS) data within the morphological framework (MRI) that these devices can provide. Much of the discussion was summed up on the final day when one speaker commented on the state of PET/MRI: "the real work has just started".

Positive and Negative Predictive Value of PET-CT in Skull Base Lesions: Case Series and Systematic Literature Review

Objectives To study positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) scans in determining malignancy in skull base lesions and perform a systematic literature review for optimal PET-CT interpretation. Design Retrospective case series and systematic literature review of the current English literature. Setting Tertiary referral academic medical center. Participants All patients with skull base lesions that underwent PET-CT and tissue biopsy from 2010 to 2013. Main Outcome Measures PPV and NPV of radiologist's report and standardized uptake value (SUV) cutoff of 2.5 and 3, biopsy with pathologic interpretation, clinical follow-up. Results A total of 31 PET-CT scans of 16 patients were studied; 10 PET-CT were performed upfront for diagnostic purposes and 21 were post-treatment surveillance scans. The PPV of radiologist's interpretation, SUV cutoff of 2.5, and SUV cutoff of 3.0 was 80%, 60%, and 68.4%, with a NPV of 100%, 83.3%, and 75%, respectively. Literature search yielded 500 abstracts; 7 studies met inclusion criteria for detailed review. No consensus or guidelines for optimal SUV cutoff value was found. Conclusions PET-CT based on SUV cutoff criteria alone has high NPV but low PPV in determining malignancy in skull base lesions. Interpretation by a radiologist experienced in nuclear medicine and neuroradiology, synthesizing clinical, SUV, and radiologic data are of superior value.

18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients

(18)F-FDG PET/CT has become the reference standard in oncologic imaging against which the performance of other imaging modalities is measured. The promise of PET/MRI includes multiparametric imaging to further improve diagnosis and phenotyping of cancer. Rather than focusing on these capabilities, many investigators have examined whether (18)F-FDG PET combined with mostly anatomic MRI improves cancer staging and restaging. After a description of PET/MRI scanner designs and a discussion of technical and operational issues, we review the available literature to determine whether cancer assessments are improved with PET/MRI. The available data show that PET/MRI is feasible and performs as well as PET/CT in most types of cancer. Diagnostic advantages may be achievable in prostate cancer and in bone metastases, whereas disadvantages exist in lung nodule assessments. We conclude that (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and PET/CT provide comparable diagnostic information when MRI is used simply to provide the anatomic framework. Thus, PET/MRI could be used in lieu of PET/CT if this approach becomes economically viable and if reasonable workflows can be established. Future studies should explore the multiparametric potential of MRI.