1
|
Schoop RAL, de Roode LM, de Boer LL, Dashtbozorg B. Framework for Deep Learning Based Multi-Modality Image Registration of Snapshot and Pathology Images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2024; 28:6699-6711. [PMID: 39150810 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3444908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2024]
Abstract
Multi-modality image registration is an important task in medical imaging because it allows for information from different domains to be correlated. Histopathology plays a crucial role in oncologic surgery as it is the gold standard for investigating tissue composition from surgically excised specimens. Research studies are increasingly focused on registering medical imaging modalities such as white light cameras, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound to pathology images. The main challenge in registration tasks involving pathology images comes from addressing the considerable amount of deformation present. This work provides a framework for deep learning-based multi-modality registration of microscopic pathology images to another imaging modality. The proposed framework is validated on the registration of prostate ex-vivo white light camera snapshot images to pathology hematoxylin-eosin images of the same specimen. A pipeline is presented detailing data acquisition, protocol considerations, image dissimilarity, training experiments, and validation. A comprehensive analysis is done on the impact of pre-processing, data augmentation, loss functions, and regularization. This analysis is supplemented by clinically motivated evaluation metrics to avoid the pitfalls of only using ubiquitous image comparison metrics. Consequently, a robust training configuration capable of performing the desired registration task is found. Utilizing the proposed approach, we achieved a dice similarity coefficient of 0.96, a mutual information score of 0.54, a target registration error of 2.4 mm, and a regional dice similarity coefficient of 0.70.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zamboglou C, Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Kirste S, Sprave T, Gratzke C, Chen RC, Carl EG, Weber WA, Mix M, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Baltas D, Jenkner C, Grosu AL. PSMA-PET/MRI-Based Focal Dose Escalation in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (HypoFocal-SBRT): Study Protocol of a Randomized, Multicentric Phase III Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225795. [PMID: 34830950 PMCID: PMC8616152 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Technical advances in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery have substantially changed RT concepts for primary prostate cancer (PCa) by (i) enabling a reduction of treatment time, and by (ii) enabling safe delivery of high RT doses. Several studies proposed a dose-response relationship for patients with primary PCa and especially in patients with high-risk features, as dose escalation leads to improved tumor control. In parallel to the improvements in RT techniques, diagnostic imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific-membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) evolved and enable an accurate depiction of the intraprostatic tumor mass for the first time. The HypoFocal-SBRT study combines ultra-hypofractionated RT/stereotactic body RT, with focal RT dose escalation on intraprostatic tumor sides by applying state of the art diagnostic imaging and most modern RT concepts. This novel strategy will be compared with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHRT), one option for the curative primary treatment of PCa, which has been proven by several prospective trials and is recommended and carried out worldwide. We suspect an increase in relapse-free survival (RFS), and we will assess quality of life in order to detect potential changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol 4108, Cyprus
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Huber
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | | | - Wolfgang A. Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Carolin Jenkner
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen K, Liu B, Zhou X, Ji Y, Chen L, Wang Q, Xue W. The Evolving Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction in Progressive Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:683793. [PMID: 34395251 PMCID: PMC8358601 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely used in prostate cancer to evaluate the localized tumor burden and detect symptomatic metastatic lesions early. 18F-FDG is the most used tracer for oncologic imaging, but it has limitations in detecting early-stage prostate cancer. 68Ga-PSMA is a new tracer that has high specificity and sensibility in detecting local and metastatic tumors. But with the progression of prostate cancer, the enhancement of glucose metabolism in progressive prostate cancer provides a chance for 18F-FDG. This review focuses on PET/CT in the detection and prognosis of prostate cancer, summarizing the literature on 18F-FDG and 68Ga-PSMA in prostate cancer and highlighting that 18F-FDG has advantages in detecting local recurrence, visceral and lymph node metastases compared to 68Ga-PSMA in partial progressive prostate cancer and castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. We emphasize 18F-FDG PET/CT can compensate for the weakness of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in progressive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiyi Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xue
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zanoni L, Mei R, Bianchi L, Giunchi F, Maltoni L, Pultrone CV, Nanni C, Bossert I, Matti A, Schiavina R, Fiorentino M, Fonti C, Lodi F, D’Errico A, Brunocilla E, Fanti S. The Role of [ 18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [ 11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071575. [PMID: 33805543 PMCID: PMC8037300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of [18F]Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in the characterization of intra-prostatic lesions was evaluated in high-risk primary PCa patients, scheduled for radical surgery, comparing investigational [18F]Fluciclovine and conventional [11C]Choline PET/CT results with the reference standard of pathologic surgical specimen. PET visual and semi-quantitative analyses were performed: for instance, patient-based, blinded to histopathology; subsequently lesion-based, unblinded, according to a pathology reference mapping. Among 19 pts, 45 malignant and 31 benign lesions were found. The highest SUVmax matched with the lobe of the index lesion in 89% of pts and a direct correlation between [18F]Fluciclovine uptake values and pISUP was demonstrated. Overall, the lesion-based performance of PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax, Target to background Ratio-TBRs) with either [18F]Fluciclovine or [11C]Choline, in detecting either malignant/ISUP2-5/ISUP4-5 PCa lesions, was moderate and similar (AUCs ≥ 0.70), but still inadequate (AUCs ≤ 0.81) as standalone staging procedure. TBRs (especially with threshold higher than bone marrow) may be complementary to implement malignancy targeting. Abstract The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the characterization of intra-prostatic lesions in high-risk primary PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, in comparison with conventional [11C]Choline PET/CT and validated by prostatectomy pathologic examination. Secondary aims were to determine the performance of PET semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax; target-to-background ratios [TBRs], using abdominal aorta, bone marrow and liver as backgrounds) for malignant lesion detection (and best cut-off values) and to search predictive factors of malignancy. A six sextants prostate template was created and used by PET readers and pathologists for data comparison and validation. PET visual and semi-quantitative analyses were performed: for instance, patient-based, blinded to histopathology; subsequently lesion-based, un-blinded, according to the pathology reference template. Among 19 patients included (mean age 63 years, 89% high and 11% very-high-risk, mean PSA 9.15 ng/mL), 45 malignant and 31 benign lesions were found and 19 healthy areas were selected (n = 95). For both tracers, the location of the “blinded” prostate SUVmax matched with the lobe of the lesion with the highest pGS in 17/19 cases (89%). There was direct correlation between [18F]Fluciclovine uptake values and pISUP. Overall, lesion-based (n = 95), the performance of PET semiquantitative parameters, with either [18F]Fluciclovine or [11C]Choline, in detecting either malignant/ISUP2-5/ISUP4-5 PCa lesions, was moderate and similar (AUCs ≥ 0.70) but still inadequate (AUCs ≤ 0.81) as a standalone staging procedure. A [18F]Fluciclovine TBR-L3 ≥ 1.5 would depict a clinical significant lesion with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 68% respectively; whereas a SUVmax cut-off value of 4 would be able to identify a ISUP 4-5 lesion in all cases (sensitivity 100%), although with low specificity (52%). TBRs (especially with threshold significantly higher than aorta and slightly higher than bone marrow), may be complementary to implement malignancy targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Zanoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.N.); (F.L.); (S.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-051-214-3959
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.B.); (C.V.P.); (R.S.); (E.B.)
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Francesca Giunchi
- Pathology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.G.); (A.D.)
| | - Lorenzo Maltoni
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone
- Division of Urology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.B.); (C.V.P.); (R.S.); (E.B.)
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.N.); (F.L.); (S.F.)
| | - Irene Bossert
- Nuclear Medicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Antonella Matti
- Nuclear Medicine, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy;
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.B.); (C.V.P.); (R.S.); (E.B.)
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Michelangelo Fiorentino
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Cristina Fonti
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Filippo Lodi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.N.); (F.L.); (S.F.)
| | - Antonietta D’Errico
- Pathology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.G.); (A.D.)
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.B.); (C.V.P.); (R.S.); (E.B.)
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.N.); (F.L.); (S.F.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.M.); (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fennell JT, Gkika E, Grosu AL. Molecular Imaging in Photon Radiotherapy. Recent Results Cancer Res 2020; 216:845-863. [PMID: 32594409 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42618-7_27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, more than ever before, the treatment of cancer patients requires an interdisciplinary approach more than ever. Radiation therapy (RT) has become an indispensable pillar of cancer treatment early on, offering a local, curative treatment option and symptom control in palliative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giovacchini G, Guglielmo P, Mapelli P, Incerti E, Gajate AMS, Giovannini E, Riondato M, Briganti A, Gianolli L, Ciarmiello A, Picchio M. 11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in prostate cancer patients with PSA < 1 NG/ml. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:921-929. [PMID: 30631911 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4253-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main drawback of 11C-choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical failure is the relatively low positive detection rate for prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 1 ng/ml. This study assessed whether 11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in PCa patients with PSA < 1 ng/ml. METHODS This retrospective study included 210 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent 11C-choline PET/CT from December 1, 2004 to July 31, 2007 due to biochemical failure. PCa-specific survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinicopathologic variables and PCa-specific survival. PCa-specific survival was computed as the interval from radical prostatectomy to PCa-specific death. RESULTS Median follow-up after radical prostatectomy was 6.9 years (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.0-14.5 years). 11C-choline PET/CT was positive in 20.5% of patients. Median PCa-specific survival was 13.4 years (95% CI, 9.9-16.8 years) in patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT, and it was not achieved in patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT (log-rank, chi-square = 15.0, P < 0.001). Ten-year survival probabilities for patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT and for patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT were 86.0% (95% CI: 80.7%-91.3%) and 63.6% (95% CI: 54.5-72.7%). At multivariate analysis, only 11C-choline PET/CT significantly predicted PCa-specific survival (hazard ratio = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.05-6.13, P = 0.038). Patients with pathological 11C-choline uptake in the prostatic bed or in pelvic lymph nodes had longer PCa-specific survival in comparison to patients with pathological tracer uptake in the skeleton (log-rank: chi-square = 27.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite the relatively low positive detection rate for PSA < 1 ng/ml, positive 11C-choline PET/CT predicts PCa-specific survival in this low PSA range. As long as more sensitive radiotracers, such as 68Ga-PSMA-11, do not become more widely available, these results might support a broader use of radiolabeled choline in restaging PCa for PSA < 1 ng/ml.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Priscilla Guglielmo
- University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Incerti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Mattia Riondato
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ciarmiello
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ceci F, Fanti S, Walz J. Local and Systemic Staging by Modern Imaging Modalities in Prostate Cancer. Urol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42623-5_69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
8
|
Zamboglou C, Eiber M, Fassbender TR, Eder M, Kirste S, Bock M, Schilling O, Reichel K, van der Heide UA, Grosu AL. Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:8-16. [PMID: 33458410 PMCID: PMC7807571 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas R. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schilling
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reichel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Castellucci P, Ceci F, Fanti S. Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using 11C-Choline PET/Computed Tomography. Urol Clin North Am 2018; 45:481-487. [PMID: 30031467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the role of 11C-choline-PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients with prostate cancer for diagnosis, staging, and restaging the disease in case of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment. The main application of this imaging procedure is restaging of the disease in case of biochemical recurrence. 11C-Choline-PET/CT proved its value for metastases-directed salvage therapies and for monitoring therapy response in castration-resistant patients. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen kinetics values confirmed their correlation with 11C-choline PET/CT sensitivity.11C-CholinePET/CT, despite low sensitivity to stage disease or in case of biochemical failure with low PSA levels, has an important impact on the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Castellucci
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gkika E, Oehlke O, Bunea H, Wiedenmann N, Adebahr S, Nestle U, Zamboglou C, Kirste S, Fennell J, Brunner T, Gainey M, Baltas D, Langer M, Urbach H, Bock M, Meyer PT, Grosu AL. Biological imaging for individualized therapy in radiation oncology: part II medical and clinical aspects. Future Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography and multiparametric MRI provide crucial information concerning tumor extent and normal tissue anatomy. Moreover, they are able to visualize biological characteristics of the tumor, which can be considered in the radiation treatment planning and monitoring. In this review we discuss the impact of biological imaging positron emission tomography and multiparametric MRI for radiation oncology, based on the data of the literature and on the experience of our own institution in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Oliver Oehlke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Hatice Bunea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Nicole Wiedenmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Jamina Fennell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Mark Gainey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Mathias Langer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Horst Urbach
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Department of Radiology – Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ceci F, Fanti S, Walz J. Local and Systemic Staging by Modern Imaging Modalities in Prostate Cancer. Urol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42603-7_69-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Schiller F, Fechter T, Zamboglou C, Chirindel A, Salman N, Jilg CA, Drendel V, Werner M, Meyer PT, Grosu AL, Mix M. Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation. EJNMMI Phys 2017; 4:21. [PMID: 28815472 PMCID: PMC5559412 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-017-0188-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation of PET/CT in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer (PCa) requires a profound knowledge about the tracer, preferably from a quantitative evaluation. Direct visual comparison of PET/CT slices to whole prostate sections is hampered by considerable uncertainties from imperfect coregistration and fundamentally different image modalities. In the current study, we present a novel method for advanced voxel-wise comparison of histopathology from excised prostates to pre-surgical PET. Resected prostates from eight patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were scanned (ex vivo CT) and thoroughly pathologically prepared. In vivo and ex vivo CT including histopathology were coregistered with three different methods (manual, semi−/automatic). Spatial overlap after CT-based registration was evaluated with dice similarity (DSC). Furthermore, we constructed 3D cancer distribution models from histopathologic information in various slices. Subsequent smoothing reflected the intrinsically limited spatial resolution of PSMA-PET. The resulting histoPET models were used for quantitative analysis of spatial histopathology-PET pattern agreement focusing on p values and coefficients of determination (R2). We examined additional rigid mutual information (MI) coregistration directly based on PSMA-PET and histoPET. Results Mean DSC for the three different methods (ManReg, ScalFactReg, and DefReg) were 0.79 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.04, and 0.90 ± 0.02, respectively, while quantification of PET-histopathology pattern agreement after CT-based registration revealed R2 45.7, 43.2, and 41.3% on average with p < 10−5. Subsequent PET-based MI coregistration yielded R2 61.3, 55.9, and 55.6%, respectively, while implying anatomically plausible transformations. Conclusions Creating 3D histoPET models based on thorough histopathological preparation allowed sophisticated quantitative analyses showing highly significant correlations between histopathology and (PSMA-)PET. We recommend manual CT-based coregistration followed by a PET-based MI algorithm to overcome limitations of purely CT-based coregistrations for meaningful voxel-wise comparisons between PET and histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Schiller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - T Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - A Chirindel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Claraspital Basel, Kleinriehenstr. 30, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - N Salman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C A Jilg
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - V Drendel
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Werner
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - P T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - A-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zamboglou C, Sachpazidis I, Koubar K, Drendel V, Wiehle R, Kirste S, Mix M, Schiller F, Mavroidis P, Meyer PT, Werner M, Grosu AL, Baltas D. Evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose painting for localized prostate cancer using 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-PET/CT: A planning study based on histopathology reference. Radiother Oncol 2017; 123:472-477. [PMID: 28499607 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility and to evaluate the tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of IMRT dose painting using 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT for target delineation in prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS AND MATERIALS 10 patients had PSMA PET/CT scans prior to prostatectomy. GTV-PET was generated on the basis of an intraprostatic SUVmax of 30%. Two IMRT plans were generated for each patient: Plan77 which consisted of whole-prostate IMRT to 77Gy, and Plan95 which consisted of whole-prostate IMRT to 77Gy and a simultaneous integrated boost to the GTV-PET up to 95Gy (35 fractions). The feasibility of these plans was judged by their ability to adhere to the FLAME trial protocol. TCP-histo/-PET were calculated on co-registered histology (GTV-histo) and GTV-PET, respectively. NTCPs for rectum and bladder were calculated. RESULTS All plans reached prescription doses whilst adhering to dose constraints. In Plan77 and Plan95 mean doses in GTV-histo were 75.8±0.3Gy and 96.9±1Gy, respectively. Average TCP-histo values for Plan77 and Plan95 were 70% (range: 15-97%), and 96% (range: 78-100%, p<0.0001). Average TCP-PET values for Plan77 and Plan95 were 55% (range: 27-82%), and 100% (range: 99-100%, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between TCP-PET and TCP-histo in Plan95 (p=0.25). There were no significant differences in rectal (p=0.563) and bladder (p=0.3) NTCPs. CONCLUSIONS IMRT dose painting using PSMA PET/CT was technically feasible and resulted in significantly higher TCPs without higher NTCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Khodor Koubar
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vanessa Drendel
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schiller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Werner
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ballas LK, de Castro Abreu AL, Quinn DI. What Medical, Urologic, and Radiation Oncologists Want from Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2017; 57:6S-12S. [PMID: 27694176 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
As molecular imaging better delineates the state of prostate cancer, clinical management will evolve. The currently licensed imaging modalities are limited by lack of specificity or sensitivity for the extent of cancer and for predicting outcome in response to therapy. Clinicians want molecular imaging that-by being more reliable in tailoring treatment and monitoring response for each patient-will become a key facet of precision medicine, surgery, and radiation therapy. Identifying patients who are candidates for specific or novel treatments is important, but equally important is the finding that a given patient may not be a good candidate for single-modality therapy. This article presents prostate cancer scenarios in which managing clinicians would welcome molecular imaging innovations to help with decision making. The potential role of newer techniques that may help fill this wish list is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine at USC, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine at USC, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - David I Quinn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at USC, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Castellucci P, Ceci F, Fanti S. Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using 11C-Choline PET/Computed Tomography. PET Clin 2017; 12:137-143. [PMID: 28267448 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the role of 11C-choline-PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients with prostate cancer for diagnosis, staging, and restaging the disease in case of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment. The main application of this imaging procedure is restaging of the disease in case of biochemical recurrence. 11C-Choline-PET/CT proved its value for metastases-directed salvage therapies and for monitoring therapy response in castration-resistant patients. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen kinetics values confirmed their correlation with 11C-choline PET/CT sensitivity.11C-CholinePET/CT, despite low sensitivity to stage disease or in case of biochemical failure with low PSA levels, has an important impact on the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Castellucci
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zamboglou C, Drendel V, Jilg CA, Rischke HC, Beck TI, Schultze-Seemann W, Krauss T, Mix M, Schiller F, Wetterauer U, Werner M, Langer M, Bock M, Meyer PT, Grosu AL. Comparison of 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for gross tumour volume detection in patients with primary prostate cancer based on slice by slice comparison with histopathology. Am J Cancer Res 2017; 7:228-237. [PMID: 28042330 PMCID: PMC5196899 DOI: 10.7150/thno.16638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The exact detection and delineation of the intraprostatic tumour burden is crucial for treatment planning in primary prostate cancer (PCa). We compared 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis and tumour delineation in patients with primary PCa based on slice by slice correlation with histopathological reference material. Methodology: Seven patients with histopathologically proven primary PCa underwent 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT and MRI followed by radical prostatectomy. Resected prostates were scanned by ex-vivo CT in a special localizer and prepared for histopathology. Invasive PCa was delineated on a HE stained histologic tissue slide and matched to ex-vivo CT to obtain gross tumor volume (GTV-)histo. Ex-vivo CT including GTV-histo and MRI data were matched to in-vivo CT(PET). Consensus contours based on MRI (GTV-MRI), PSMA PET (GTV-PET) or the combination of both (GTV-union/-intersection) were created. In each in-vivo CT slice the prostate was separated into 4 equal segments and sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET and mpMRI were assessed by comparison with histological reference material. Furthermore, the spatial overlap between GTV-histo and GTV-PET/-MRI and the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) were calculated. In the case of multifocal PCa (4/7 patients), SUV values (PSMA PET) and ADC-values (diffusion weighted MRI) were obtained for each lesion. Results: PSMA PET and mpMRI detected PCa in all patients. GTV-histo was detected in 225 of 340 segments (66.2%). Sensitivity and specificity for GTV-PET, GTV-MRI, GTV-union and GTV-intersection were 75% and 87%, 70% and 82%, 82% and 67%, 55% and 99%, respectively. GTV-histo had on average the highest overlap with GTV-union (57±22%), which was significantly higher than overlap with GTV-MRI (p=0.016) and GTV-PET (p=0.016), respectively. The mean DSC for GTV-union, GTV-PET and GTV-MRI was 0.51 (±0.18), 0.45 (±0.17) and 0.48 (±0.19), respectively. In every patient with multifocal PCa there was one lesion which had both the highest SUV and the lowest ADC-value (mean and max). Conclusion: In a slice by slice analysis with histopathology, 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI showed high sensitivity and specificity in detection of primary PCa. A combination of both methods performed even better in terms of sensitivity (GTV-union) and specificity (GTV-intersection). A moderate to good spatial overlap with GTV-histo was observed for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI alone which was significantly improved by GTV-union. Further studies are warranted to analyse the impact of these preliminary findings for diagnostic (multimodal guided TRUS biopsy) and therapeutic (focal therapy) strategies in primary PCa.
Collapse
|
17
|
Nitsch S, Hakenberg OW, Heuschkel M, Dräger D, Hildebrandt G, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/CT: Diagnosis and Initial Staging. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:38S-42S. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
18
|
PET imaging in prostate cancer, state of the art: a review of 18F-choline and 11C-choline PET/CT applications. Clin Transl Imaging 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-016-0191-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
19
|
Single fraction multimodal image guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8:241-8. [PMID: 27504134 PMCID: PMC4965505 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We present a novel method for treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) following radiation therapy: focal, multimodal image guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We treated two patients with recurrent PCa after primary (#1) or adjuvant (#2) external beam radiation therapy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), choline, positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), or prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET combined with CT identified a single intraprostatic lesion. Positron emission tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion guided transperineal biopsy confirmed PCa within each target lesion. We defined a PET and mpMRI based gross tumor volume (GTV). A 5 mm isotropic margin was applied additionally to each lesion to generate a planning target volume (PTV), which accounts for technical fusion inaccuracies. A D90 of 18 Gy was intended in one fraction to each PTV using ultrasound guided HDR brachytherapy. RESULTS Six month follow-up showed adequate prostate specific antygen (PSA) decline in both patients (ΔPSA 83% in patient 1 and ΔPSA 59.3% in patient 2). Follow-up 3-tesla MRI revealed regressive disease in both patients and PSMA-PET/CT showed no evidence of active disease in patient #1. No acute or late toxicities occurred. CONCLUSIONS Single fraction, focal, multimodal image guided salvage HDR brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer is a feasible therapy for selected patients with single lesions. This approach has to be evaluated in larger clinical trials.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zamboglou C, Schiller F, Fechter T, Wieser G, Jilg CA, Chirindel A, Salman N, Drendel V, Werner M, Mix M, Meyer PT, Grosu AL. (68)Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT Versus Histopathology in Primary Localized Prostate Cancer: A Voxel-Wise Comparison. Theranostics 2016; 6:1619-28. [PMID: 27446496 PMCID: PMC4955061 DOI: 10.7150/thno.15344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We performed a voxel-wise comparison of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT with prostate histopathology to evaluate the performance of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA for the detection and delineation of primary prostate cancer (PCa). Methodology: Nine patients with histopathological proven primary PCa underwent 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT followed by radical prostatectomy. Resected prostates were scanned by ex-vivo CT in a special localizer and histopathologically prepared. Histopathological information was matched to ex-vivo CT. PCa volume (PCa-histo) and non-PCa tissue in the prostate (NPCa-histo) were processed to obtain a PCa-model, which was adjusted to PET-resolution (histo-PET). Each histo-PET was coregistered to in-vivo PSMA-PET/CT data. Results: Analysis of spatial overlap between histo-PET and PSMA PET revealed highly significant correlations (p < 10-5) in nine patients and moderate to high coefficients of determination (R²) from 42 to 82 % with an average of 60 ± 14 % in eight patients (in one patient R2 = 7 %). Mean SUVmean in PCa-histo and NPCa-histo was 5.6 ± 6.1 and 3.3 ± 2.5 (p = 0.012). Voxel-wise receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses comparing the prediction by PSMA-PET with the non-smoothed tumor distribution from histopathology yielded an average area under the curve of 0.83 ± 0.12. Absolute and relative SUV (normalized to SUVmax) thresholds for achieving at least 90 % sensitivity were 3.19 ± 3.35 and 0.28 ± 0.09, respectively. Conclusions: Voxel-wise analyses revealed good correlations of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT and histopathology in eight out of nine patients. Thus, PSMA-PET allows a reliable detection and delineation of PCa as basis for PET-guided focal therapies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jadvar H. Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:889-98. [PMID: 27193789 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a prevalent public health problem worldwide. While imaging has played a major role in this disease, there still remain many challenges and opportunities. Positron emission tomography with various physiologically based radiotracers is fundamentally suited to interrogate this biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease along the course of its natural history. In this article, I review briefly the published evidence for the use of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 11C-acetate, and 18F- or 11C-choline in the imaging evaluation of prostate cancer. Although the focus of the article will be on these radiotracers given the accumulated experience with them, but I will also comment on the outlook for the use of other emerging PET radiotracers such as those targeted to the prostate-specific membrane antigen and the amino acid metabolism pathway. It is anticipated that PET will play major role in the evaluation of prostate cancer in the current evidence-based medicine environment. There will also be exciting novel prospects for the use of therapeutic-diagnostic (theransotic) pairs in the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar Street, CSC 102, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Imaging plays an important role in the clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa). Thus, much effort has gone into improving imaging modalities in PCa. This review focuses on the recent advancements in transrectal ultrasound, MRI and PET during the past year. RECENT FINDINGS Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound with microbubbles may be useful in PCa, but needs further evaluation before more widespread use. Multiparametric MRI has emerged as a valuable tool to assist clinical management of PCa, and great progress has been made in the past year. Several radionuclides for PET/computed tomography have been tested in clinical trials; most of the studies have used radiolabeled choline. However, new PET tracers such as (18)F-1-amino-3-fluorine 18-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid and (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands are demonstrating promising results. PET/MRI may further improve imaging in PCa, but this imaging modality needs to be evaluated further. SUMMARY Several advances in the imaging of PCa have been made during the past year. In particular, important clinical developments have been reported in multiparametric MRI, PET/computed tomography, and PET/MRI. The continuing development of imaging techniques in PCa has the potential to optimize treatment of PCa. However, the optimal imaging strategies for each of the major clinical scenarios in PCa have not yet been identified.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zamboglou C, Wieser G, Hennies S, Rempel I, Kirste S, Soschynski M, Rischke HC, Fechter T, Jilg CA, Langer M, Meyer PT, Bock M, Grosu AL. MRI versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for gross tumour volume delineation in radiation treatment planning of primary prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:889-897. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3257-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|