1
|
Galldiks N, Kaufmann TJ, Vollmuth P, Lohmann P, Smits M, Veronesi MC, Langen KJ, Rudà R, Albert NL, Hattingen E, Law I, Hutterer M, Soffietti R, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1181-1194. [PMID: 38466087 PMCID: PMC11226881 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnostics have significantly evolved with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In addition to anatomical MRI, these modalities may provide valuable information for several clinical applications such as differential diagnosis, delineation of tumor extent, prognostication, differentiation between tumor relapse and treatment-related changes, and the evaluation of response to anticancer therapy. In particular, joint recommendations of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Group, the European Association of Neuro-oncology, and major European and American Nuclear Medicine societies highlighted that the additional clinical value of radiolabeled amino acids compared to anatomical MRI alone is outstanding and that its widespread clinical use should be supported. For advanced MRI and its steadily increasing use in clinical practice, the Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition provided more recently an updated acquisition protocol for the widely used dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Besides amino acid PET and perfusion MRI, other PET tracers and advanced MRI techniques (e.g. MR spectroscopy) are of considerable clinical interest and are increasingly integrated into everyday clinical practice. Nevertheless, these modalities have shortcomings which should be considered in clinical routine. This comprehensive review provides an overview of potential challenges, limitations, and pitfalls associated with PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques in patients with gliomas or brain metastases. Despite these issues, PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques continue to play an indispensable role in brain tumor management. Acknowledging and mitigating these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, standardized protocols, and continuous innovation will further enhance the utility of these modalities in guiding optimal patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | | | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Brain Tumour Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael C Veronesi
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Goethe University, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Markus Hutterer
- Department of Neurology with Acute Geriatrics, Saint John of God Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Filss CP, Cramer J, Löher S, Lohmann P, Stoffels G, Stegmayr C, Kocher M, Heinzel A, Galldiks N, Wittsack HJ, Sabel M, Neumaier B, Scheins J, Shah NJ, Meyer PT, Mottaghy FM, Langen KJ. Assessment of Brain Tumour Perfusion Using Early-Phase 18F-FET PET: Comparison with Perfusion-Weighted MRI. Mol Imaging Biol 2024; 26:36-44. [PMID: 37848641 PMCID: PMC10827807 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-023-01861-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Morphological imaging using MRI is essential for brain tumour diagnostics. Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI), as well as amino acid PET, may provide additional information in ambiguous cases. Since PWI is often unavailable in patients referred for amino acid PET, we explored whether maps of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in brain tumours can be extracted from the early phase of PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET). PROCEDURE Using a hybrid brain PET/MRI scanner, PWI and dynamic 18F-FET PET were performed in 33 patients with cerebral glioma and four patients with highly vascularized meningioma. The time interval from 0 to 2 min p.i. was selected to best reflect the blood pool phase in 18F-FET PET. For each patient, maps of MR-rCBV, early 18F-FET PET (0-2 min p.i.) and late 18F-FET PET (20-40 min p.i.) were generated and coregistered. Volumes of interest were placed on the tumour (VOI-TU) and normal-appearing brain (VOI-REF). The correlation between tumour-to-brain ratios (TBR) of the different parameters was analysed. In addition, three independent observers evaluated MR-rCBV and early 18F-FET maps (18F-FET-rCBV) for concordance in signal intensity, tumour extent and intratumoural distribution. RESULTS TBRs calculated from MR-rCBV and 18F-FET-rCBV showed a significant correlation (r = 0.89, p < 0.001), while there was no correlation between late 18F-FET PET and MR-rCBV (r = 0.24, p = 0.16) and 18F-FET-rCBV (r = 0.27, p = 0.11). Visual rating yielded widely agreeing findings or only minor differences between MR-rCBV maps and 18F-FET-rCBV maps in 93 % of the tumours (range of three independent raters 91-94%, kappa among raters 0.78-1.0). CONCLUSION Early 18F-FET maps (0-2 min p.i.) in gliomas provide similar information to MR-rCBV maps and may be helpful when PWI is not possible or available. Further studies in gliomas are needed to evaluate whether 18F-FET-rCBV provides the same clinical information as MR-rCBV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Filss
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Julian Cramer
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Faculty of Medical Engineering and Technomathematics, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Campus Juelich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Saskia Löher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Faculty of Medical Engineering and Technomathematics, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Campus Juelich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans J Wittsack
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Sabel
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Radiochemistry and Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Scheins
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - N Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- JARA - BRAIN - Translational Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany
- JARA - BRAIN - Translational Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cobes N, Tran S, Mathon B, Nichelli L, Bielle F, Touat M, Kas A, Rozenblum L. Exploring the mechanism of 18F-fluorodopa uptake in recurrent high-grade gliomas: A comprehensive histomolecular-positron emission tomography analysis. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16093. [PMID: 37823694 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable tool for managing high-grade gliomas (HGGs), but there is a lack of literature on its relationship with glioma subtypes since the 2021 reclassification of brain tumors. There is also debate surrounding the mechanism of 18F-FDOPA uptake, particularly after chemoradiation therapy. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between 18F-FDOPA uptake and histomolecular characteristics, particularly L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression, in recurrent gliomas, and examine their impact on survival in HGGs. METHODS Thirty-nine patients with recurrent HGGs (14 isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]-mutant, 25 IDH-wildtype) who underwent a brain 18F-FDOPA PET/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by surgical resection of the 18F-FDOPA-avid lesion within 6 months, were retrospectively reviewed. PET results were compared with histological examination and for SCL7A5/LAT1 immunostaining. The study also examined the relationship between PET parameters, LAT1 expression, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Astrocytoma IDH-mutant G4 had higher 18F-FDOPA uptake than glioblastoma IDH-wildtype G4 (maximum tumor-to-normal brain ratio [TBRmax] 5 [3.4-9] vs. 3.8 [2.8-5.9], p = 0.02). IDH-mutant gliomas had higher LAT1 expression than IDH-wildtype gliomas (100 [14-273] vs. 15.5 [0-137], p < 0.05) as well as higher TBRmax (5 [2.4-9] vs. 3.8 [2.8-6], p < 0.05). In survival analysis, LAT1 score >100 was a predictor for longer progression-free survival in IDH-mutant HGGs. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our study is the first to suggest a link between LAT1 expression and IDH mutation status. We showed that higher TBRmax was associated with higher LAT1 expression and IDH mutation status. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying amino acid PET tracers uptake, especially in the post-radiation and chemotherapy settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Cobes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Suzanne Tran
- Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Mathon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Nichelli
- Department of Neuroradiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Franck Bielle
- Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Touat
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpétrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Kas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- LIB, INSERM U1146, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- LIB, INSERM U1146, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Mauler J, Kocher M, Filß CP, Stoffels G, Régio Brambilla C, Stegmayr C, Willuweit A, Worthoff WA, Shah NJ, Lerche C, Mottaghy FM, Lohmann P. Hybrid PET/MRI in Cerebral Glioma: Current Status and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3577. [PMID: 37509252 PMCID: PMC10377176 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced MRI methods and PET using radiolabelled amino acids provide valuable information, in addition to conventional MR imaging, for brain tumour diagnostics. These methods are particularly helpful in challenging situations such as the differentiation of malignant processes from benign lesions, the identification of non-enhancing glioma subregions, the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related changes, and the early assessment of responses to anticancer therapy. The debate over which of the methods is preferable in which situation is ongoing, and has been addressed in numerous studies. Currently, most radiology and nuclear medicine departments perform these examinations independently of each other, leading to multiple examinations for the patient. The advent of hybrid PET/MRI allowed a convergence of the methods, but to date simultaneous imaging has reached little relevance in clinical neuro-oncology. This is partly due to the limited availability of hybrid PET/MRI scanners, but is also due to the fact that PET is a second-line examination in brain tumours. PET is only required in equivocal situations, and the spatial co-registration of PET examinations of the brain to previous MRI is possible without disadvantage. A key factor for the benefit of PET/MRI in neuro-oncology is a multimodal approach that provides decisive improvements in the diagnostics of brain tumours compared with a single modality. This review focuses on studies investigating the diagnostic value of combined amino acid PET and 'advanced' MRI in patients with cerebral gliomas. Available studies suggest that the combination of amino acid PET and advanced MRI improves grading and the histomolecular characterisation of newly diagnosed tumours. Few data are available concerning the delineation of tumour extent. A clear additive diagnostic value of amino acid PET and advanced MRI can be achieved regarding the differentiation of tumour recurrence from treatment-related changes. Here, the PET-guided evaluation of advanced MR methods seems to be helpful. In summary, there is growing evidence that a multimodal approach can achieve decisive improvements in the diagnostics of cerebral gliomas, for which hybrid PET/MRI offers optimal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jörg Mauler
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Peter Filß
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Cláudia Régio Brambilla
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Antje Willuweit
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Wieland Alexander Worthoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Lerche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Felix Manuel Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:693-700. [PMID: 37055222 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peira E, Sensi F, Rei L, Gianeri R, Tortora D, Fiz F, Piccardo A, Bottoni G, Morana G, Chincarini A. Towards an Automated Approach to the Semi-Quantification of [ 18F]F-DOPA PET in Pediatric-Type Diffuse Gliomas. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082765. [PMID: 37109101 PMCID: PMC10142802 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate the use of a computer-aided, semi-quantification approach to [18F]F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET) in pediatric-type diffuse gliomas (PDGs) to calculate the tumor-to-background ratio. METHODS A total of 18 pediatric patients with PDGs underwent magnetic resonance imaging and [18F]F-DOPA PET, which were analyzed using both manual and automated procedures. The former provided a tumor-to-normal-tissue ratio (TN) and tumor-to-striatal-tissue ratio (TS), while the latter provided analogous scores (tn, ts). We tested the correlation, consistency, and ability to stratify grading and survival between these methods. RESULTS High Pearson correlation coefficients resulted between the ratios calculated with the two approaches: ρ = 0.93 (p < 10-4) and ρ = 0.814 (p < 10-4). The analysis of the residuals suggested that tn and ts were more consistent than TN and TS. Similarly to TN and TS, the automatically computed scores showed significant differences between low- and high-grade gliomas (p ≤ 10-4, t-test) and the overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with higher values when compared to those with lower ones (p < 10-3, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that the proposed computer-aided approach could yield similar results to the manual procedure in terms of diagnostic and prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Peira
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), 16146 Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Sensi
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), 16146 Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Rei
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), 16146 Genoa, Italy
| | - Ruben Gianeri
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), 16146 Genoa, Italy
| | - Domenico Tortora
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- S.C. di Medicina Nucleare, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Arnoldo Piccardo
- S.C. di Medicina Nucleare, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bottoni
- S.C. di Medicina Nucleare, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morana
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Differentiating high-grade glioma progression from treatment-related changes with dynamic [ 18F]FDOPA PET: a multicentric study. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:2548-2560. [PMID: 36367578 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09221-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diagnostic accuracy of amino-acid PET for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes (TRC) is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. Our study assesses the diagnostic value of static and dynamic [18F]FDOPA PET acquisitions to differentiate between high-grade glioma (HGG) recurrence and TRC in a large cohort sourced from two independent nuclear medicine centers. METHODS We retrospectively identified 106 patients with suspected glioma recurrences (WHO GIII, n = 38; GIV, n = 68; IDH-mutant, n = 35, IDH-wildtype, n = 71). Patients underwent dynamic [18F]FDOPA PET/CT (n = 83) or PET/MRI (n = 23), and static tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs), metabolic tumor volumes and dynamic parameters (time to peak and slope) were determined. The final diagnosis was either defined by histopathology or a clinical-radiological follow-up at 6 months. Optimal [18F]FDOPA PET parameter cut-offs were obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Predictive factors and clinical parameters were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses. RESULTS Surgery or the clinical-radiological 6-month follow-up identified 71 progressions and 35 treatment-related changes. TBRmean, with a threshold of 1.8, best-differentiated glioma recurrence/progression from post-treatment changes in the whole population (sensitivity 82%, specificity 71%, p < 0.0001) whereas curve slope was only significantly different in IDH-mutant HGGs (n = 25). In survival analyses, MTV was a clinical independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival on the multivariate analysis (p ≤ 0.01). A curve slope > -0.12/h was an independent predictor for longer PFS in IDH-mutant HGGs CONCLUSION: Our multicentric study confirms the high accuracy of [18F]FDOPA PET to differentiate recurrent malignant gliomas from TRC and emphasizes the diagnostic and prognostic value of dynamic acquisitions for IDH-mutant HGGs. KEY POINTS • The diagnostic accuracy of dynamic amino-acid PET, for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes, is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. • This multicentric study confirms the high accuracy of static [18F]FDOPA PET images for differentiating progression from treatment-related changes in a homogeneous population of high-grade gliomas and highlights the diagnostic and prognostic value of dynamic acquisitions for IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas. • Dynamic acquisitions should be performed in IDH-mutant glioma patients to provide valuable information for the differential diagnosis of recurrence and treatment-related changes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Henssen D, Meijer F, Verburg FA, Smits M. Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20211232. [PMID: 36062962 PMCID: PMC10997013 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik A. Verburg
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical
center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wollring MM, Werner JM, Ceccon G, Lohmann P, Filss CP, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Clinical applications and prospects of PET imaging in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2022; 162:481-488. [PMID: 36577872 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04218-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PET imaging using radiolabeled amino acids in addition to MRI has become a valuable diagnostic tool in the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of PET studies in glioma patients with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH). A considerable fraction of these tumors typically show no contrast enhancement on MRI, especially when classified as grade 2 according to the World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors. Major diagnostic challenges in this situation are differential diagnosis, target definition for diagnostic biopsies, delineation of glioma extent for treatment planning, differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumor progression, and the evaluation of response to alkylating agents. The main focus of this review is the role of amino acid PET in this setting. Furthermore, in light of clinical trials using IDH inhibitors targeting the mutated IDH enzyme for treating patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, we also aim to give an outlook on PET probes specifically targeting the IDH mutation, which appear potentially helpful for response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Wollring
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Christian P Filss
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allard B, Dissaux B, Bourhis D, Dissaux G, Schick U, Salaün PY, Abgral R, Querellou S. Hotspot on 18F-FET PET/CT to Predict Aggressive Tumor Areas for Radiotherapy Dose Escalation Guiding in High-Grade Glioma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010098. [PMID: 36612093 PMCID: PMC9817533 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard therapy strategy for high-grade glioma (HGG) is based on the maximal surgery followed by radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) with insufficient control of the disease. Recurrences are mainly localized in the radiation field, suggesting an interest in radiotherapy dose escalation to better control the disease locally. We aimed to identify a similarity between the areas of high uptake on O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET) before RT-CT, the residual tumor on post-therapy NADIR magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the area of recurrence on MRI. This is an ancillary study from the IMAGG prospective trial assessing the interest of FET PET imaging in RT target volume definition of HGG. We included patients with diagnoses of HGG obtained by biopsy or tumor resection. These patients underwent FET PET and brain MRIs, both after diagnosis and before RT-CT. The follow-up consisted of sequential brain MRIs performed every 3 months until recurrence. Tumor delineation on the initial MRI 1 (GTV 1), post-RT-CT NADIR MRI 2 (GTV 2), and progression MRI 3 (GTV 3) were performed semi-automatically and manually adjusted by a neuroradiologist specialist in neuro-oncology. GTV 2 and GTV 3 were then co-registered on FET PET data. Tumor volumes on FET PET (MTV) were delineated using a tumor to background ratio (TBR) ≥ 1.6 and different % SUVmax PET thresholds. Spatial similarity between different volumes was performed using the dice (DICE), Jaccard (JSC), and overlap fraction (OV) indices and compared together in the biopsy or partial surgery group (G1) and the total or subtotal surgery group (G2). Another overlap index (OV') was calculated to determine the threshold with the highest probability of being included in the residual volume after RT-CT on MRI 2 and in MRI 3 (called "hotspot"). A total of 23 patients were included, of whom 22% (n = 5) did not have a NADIR MRI 2 due to a disease progression diagnosed on the first post-RT-CT MRI evaluation. Among the 18 patients who underwent a NADIR MRI 2, the average residual tumor was approximately 71.6% of the GTV 1. A total of 22% of patients (5/23) showed an increase in GTV 2 without diagnosis of true progression by the multidisciplinary team (MDT). Spatial similarity between MTV and GTV 2 and between MTV and GTV 3 were higher using a TBR ≥ 1.6 threshold. These indices were significantly better in the G1 group than the G2 group. In the FET hotspot analysis, the best similarity (good agreement) with GTV 2 was found in the G1 group using a 90% SUVmax delineation method and showed a trend of statistical difference with those (poor agreement) in the G2 group (OV' = 0.67 vs. 0.38, respectively, p = 0.068); whereas the best similarity (good agreement) with GTV 3 was found in the G1 group using a 80% SUVmax delineation method and was significantly higher than those (poor agreement) in the G2 group (OV'= 0.72 vs. 0.35, respectively, p = 0.014). These results showed modest spatial similarity indices between MTV, GTV 2, and GTV 3 of HGG. Nevertheless, the results were significantly improved in patients who underwent only biopsy or partial surgery. TBR ≥ 1.6 and 80-90% SUVmax FET delineation methods showing a good agreement in the hotspot concept for targeting standard dose and radiation boost. These findings need to be tested in a larger randomized prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastien Allard
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
| | - Brieg Dissaux
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- GETBO UMR U_1304, Inserm, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- Radiology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
| | - David Bourhis
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- GETBO UMR U_1304, Inserm, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
| | - Gurvan Dissaux
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- LaTIM, INSERM 1101, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- LaTIM, INSERM 1101, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Salaün
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- GETBO UMR U_1304, Inserm, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
| | - Ronan Abgral
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- GETBO UMR U_1304, Inserm, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
| | - Solène Querellou
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- UFR Médecine, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- GETBO UMR U_1304, Inserm, University of Western Brittany (UBO), 29200 Brest, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Castello A, Castellani M, Florimonte L, Ciccariello G, Mansi L, Lopci E. PET radiotracers in glioma: a review of clinical indications and evidence. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00523-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
12
|
Hormuth DA, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Chad Quarles C, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 187:114367. [PMID: 35654212 PMCID: PMC11165420 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a fourth pillar in the treatment of brain tumors and, when combined with radiation therapy, may improve patient outcomes and reduce the neurotoxicity. As with other combination therapies, the identification of a treatment schedule that maximizes the synergistic effect of radiation- and immune-therapy is a fundamental challenge. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling is one promising approach to systematically investigate therapeutic combinations to maximize positive outcomes within a rigorous framework. However, successful clinical translation of model-generated combinations of treatment requires patient-specific data to allow the models to be meaningfully initialized and parameterized. Quantitative imaging techniques have emerged as a promising source of high quality, spatially and temporally resolved data for the development and validation of mathematical models. In this review, we will present approaches to personalize mechanism-based modeling frameworks with patient data, and then discuss how these techniques could be leveraged to improve brain cancer outcomes through patient-specific modeling and optimization of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Chase Christenson
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Brandon Curl
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Santo G, Laudicella R, Linguanti F, Nappi AG, Abenavoli E, Vergura V, Rubini G, Sciagrà R, Arnone G, Schillaci O, Minutoli F, Baldari S, Quartuccio N, Bisdas S. The Utility of Conventional Amino Acid PET Radiotracers in the Evaluation of Glioma Recurrence also in Comparison with MRI. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040844. [PMID: 35453892 PMCID: PMC9027186 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM In this comprehensive review we present an update on the most relevant studies evaluating the utility of amino acid PET radiotracers for the evaluation of glioma recurrence as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS A literature search extended until June 2020 on the PubMed/MEDLINE literature database was conducted using the terms "high-grade glioma", "glioblastoma", "brain tumors", "positron emission tomography", "PET", "amino acid PET", "[11C]methyl-l-methionine", "[18F]fluoroethyl-tyrosine", "[18F]fluoro-l-dihydroxy-phenylalanine", "MET", "FET", "DOPA", "magnetic resonance imaging", "MRI", "advanced MRI", "magnetic resonance spectroscopy", "perfusion-weighted imaging", "diffusion-weighted imaging", "MRS", "PWI", "DWI", "hybrid PET/MR", "glioma recurrence", "pseudoprogression", "PSP", "treatment-related change", and "radiation necrosis" alone and in combination. Only original articles edited in English and about humans with at least 10 patients were included. RESULTS Forty-four articles were finally selected. Conventional amino acid PET tracers were demonstrated to be reliable diagnostic techniques in differentiating tumor recurrence thanks to their high uptake from tumor tissue and low background in normal grey matter, giving additional and early information to standard modalities. Among them, MET-PET seems to present the highest diagnostic value but its use is limited to on-site cyclotron facilities. [18F]labelled amino acids, such as FDOPA and FET, were developed to provide a more suitable PET tracer for routine clinical applications, and demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. When compared to the gold standard MRI, amino acid PET provides complementary and comparable information to standard modalities and seems to represent an essential tool in the differentiation between tumor recurrence and other entities such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse. CONCLUSIONS Despite the introduction of new advanced imaging techniques, the diagnosis of glioma recurrence remains challenging. In this scenario, the growing knowledge about imaging techniques and analysis, such as the combined PET/MRI and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), could represent promising tools to face this difficult and debated clinical issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Santo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.S.); (A.G.N.); (G.R.)
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (F.M.); (S.B.)
| | - Flavia Linguanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.L.); (E.A.); (V.V.); (R.S.)
| | - Anna Giulia Nappi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.S.); (A.G.N.); (G.R.)
| | - Elisabetta Abenavoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.L.); (E.A.); (V.V.); (R.S.)
| | - Vittoria Vergura
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.L.); (E.A.); (V.V.); (R.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.S.); (A.G.N.); (G.R.)
| | - Roberto Sciagrà
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.L.); (E.A.); (V.V.); (R.S.)
| | - Gaspare Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.A.); (N.Q.)
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (F.M.); (S.B.)
| | - Sergio Baldari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; (R.L.); (F.M.); (S.B.)
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.A.); (N.Q.)
| | - Sotirios Bisdas
- Department of Neuroradiology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prather KY, O’Neal CM, Westrup AM, Tullos HJ, Hughes KL, Conner AK, Glenn CA, Battiste JD. A systematic review of amino acid PET in assessing treatment response to temozolomide in glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac008. [PMID: 35300149 PMCID: PMC8923003 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria have been the gold standard for monitoring treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) and differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression. While the RANO criteria have played a key role in detecting early tumor progression, their ability to identify pseudoprogression is limited by post-treatment damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which often leads to contrast enhancement on MRI and correlates poorly to tumor status. Amino acid positron emission tomography (AA PET) is a rapidly growing imaging modality in neuro-oncology. While contrast-enhanced MRI relies on leaky vascularity or a compromised BBB for delivery of contrast agents, amino acid tracers can cross the BBB, making AA PET particularly well-suited for monitoring treatment response and diagnosing pseudoprogression. The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase through December 2021 with the search terms “temozolomide” OR “Temodar,” “glioma” OR “glioblastoma,” “PET,” and “amino acid.” There were 19 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies utilized [18F]FET, five utilized [11C]MET, and one utilized both. All studies used static AA PET parameters to evaluate TMZ treatment in glioma patients, with nine using dynamic tracer parameters in addition. Throughout these studies, AA PET demonstrated utility in TMZ treatment monitoring and predicting patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiana Y Prather
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Christen M O’Neal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Alison M Westrup
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Hurtis J Tullos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Kendall L Hughes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Andrew K Conner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Chad A Glenn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - James D Battiste
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Girard A, Le Reste PJ, Metais A, Carsin Nicol B, Chiforeanu DC, Bannier E, Campillo-Gimenez B, Devillers A, Palard-Novello X, Le Jeune F. Combining 18F-DOPA PET and MRI with perfusion-weighted imaging improves delineation of high-grade subregions in enhancing and non-enhancing gliomas prior treatment: a biopsy-controlled study. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:287-295. [PMID: 34686993 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03873-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare spatial extent of high-grade subregions detected with combined [18F]-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET and MRI to the one provided by advanced multimodal MRI alone including Contrast-enhanced (CE) and Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI). Then, we compared the accuracy between imaging modalities, in a per biopsy analysis. METHODS Participants with suspected diffuse glioma were prospectively included between June 2018 and September 2019. Volumes of high-grade subregions were delineated respectively on 18F-DOPA PET and MRI (CE and PWI). Up to three per-surgical neuronavigation-guided biopsies were performed per patient. RESULTS Thirty-eight biopsy samples from sixteen participants were analyzed. Six participants (38%) had grade IV IDH wild-type glioblastoma, six (38%) had grade III IDH-mutated astrocytoma and four (24%) had grade II IDH-mutated gliomas. Three patients had intratumoral heterogeneity with coexisting high- and low-grade tumor subregions. High-grade volumes determined with combined 18F-DOPA PET/MRI (median of 1.7 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.0, 19.1] mL) were larger than with multimodal MRI alone (median 1.3 [IQR 0.0, 12.8] mL) with low overlap (median Dice's coefficient 0.24 [IQR 0.08, 0.59]). Delineation volumes were substantially increased in five (31%) patients. In a per biopsy analysis, combined 18F-DOPA PET/MRI detected high-grade subregions with an accuracy of 58% compared to 42% (p = 0.03) with CE MRI alone and 50% (p = 0.25) using multimodal MRI (CE + PWI). CONCLUSIONS The addition of 18F-DOPA PET to multimodal MRI (CE and PWI) enlarged the delineation volumes and enhanced overall accuracy for detection of high-grade subregions. Thus, combining 18F-DOPA with advanced MRI may improve treatment planning in newly diagnosed gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Girard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Eugène Marquis Center, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France.
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM-University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Alice Metais
- Department of Pathology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Elise Bannier
- Department of Radiology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
- Empenn IRISA Research Team, Rennes University-CNRS-INRIA-INSERM, Rennes, France
| | - Boris Campillo-Gimenez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Center, Rennes, France
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM-University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Anne Devillers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Eugène Marquis Center, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Xavier Palard-Novello
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Eugène Marquis Center, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM-University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Florence Le Jeune
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Eugène Marquis Center, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM-University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cicone F, Carideo L, Scaringi C, Romano A, Mamede M, Papa A, Tofani A, Cascini GL, Bozzao A, Scopinaro F, Minniti G. Long-term metabolic evolution of brain metastases with suspected radiation necrosis following stereotactic radiosurgery: longitudinal assessment by F-DOPA PET. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1024-1034. [PMID: 33095884 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evolution of radiation necrosis (RN) varies depending on the combination of radionecrotic tissue and active tumor cells. In this study, we characterized the long-term metabolic evolution of RN by sequential PET/CT imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine (F-DOPA) in patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Thirty consecutive patients with 34 suspected radionecrotic brain metastases following SRS repeated F-DOPA PET/CT every 6 months or yearly in addition to standard MRI monitoring. Diagnoses of local progression (LP) or RN were confirmed histologically or by clinical follow-up. Semi-quantitative parameters of F-DOPA uptake were extracted at different time points, and their diagnostic performances were compared with those of corresponding contrast-enhanced MRI. RESULTS Ninety-nine F-DOPA PET scans were acquired over a median period of 18 (range: 12-66) months. Median follow-up from the baseline F-DOPA PET/CT was 48 (range 21-95) months. Overall, 24 (70.6%) and 10 (29.4%) lesions were classified as RN and LP, respectively. LP occurred after a median of 18 (range: 12-30) months from baseline PET. F-DOPA tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR) and relative standardized uptake value (rSUV) increased significantly over time in LP lesions, while remaining stable in RN lesions. The parameter showing the best diagnostic performance was rSUV (accuracy = 94.1% for the optimal threshold of 1.92). In contrast, variations of the longest tumor dimension measured on contrast-enhancing MRI did not distinguish between RN and LP. CONCLUSION F-DOPA PET has a high diagnostic accuracy for assessing the long-term evolution of brain metastases following SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Luciano Carideo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Scaringi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs (NESMOS) Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcelo Mamede
- Department of Anatomy and Imaging, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Annalisa Papa
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital "Mater Domini," Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Anna Tofani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.,Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital "Mater Domini," Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- Neuroradiology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs (NESMOS) Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Scopinaro
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Castellano A, Bailo M, Cicone F, Carideo L, Quartuccio N, Mortini P, Falini A, Cascini GL, Minniti G. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning of Gliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051063. [PMID: 33802292 PMCID: PMC7959155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The accuracy of target delineation in radiation treatment (RT) planning of cerebral gliomas is crucial to achieve high tumor control, while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, represents the current standard imaging modality for target volume delineation of gliomas. However, conventional sequences have limited capability to discriminate treatment-related changes from viable tumors, owing to the low specificity of increased blood-brain barrier permeability and peritumoral edema. Advanced physiology-based MRI techniques, such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI, have been developed for the biological characterization of gliomas and may circumvent these limitations, providing additional metabolic, structural, and hemodynamic information for treatment planning and monitoring. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) with amino acid radiopharmaceuticals, are also increasingly used in the workup of primary brain tumors, and their integration in RT planning is being evaluated in specialized centers. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical results of advanced MRI and PET imaging techniques that have promise as a complement to RT planning of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0-961-369-4155
| | - Luciano Carideo
- National Cancer Institute, G. Pascale Foundation, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90144 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies. Mol Imaging 2021; 2021:8874078. [PMID: 34194287 PMCID: PMC8205602 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8874078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Standard neuroimaging protocols for brain tumors have well-known limitations. The clinical use of additional modalities including amino acid PET (aaPET) and advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques (including DWI, PWI, and MRS) is emerging in response to the need for more accurate detection of brain tumors. In this systematic review of the past 2 years of the literature, we discuss the most recent studies that directly compare or combine aaPET and aMRI for brain tumor imaging. Methods A PubMed search was conducted for human studies incorporating both aaPET and aMRI and published between July 2018 and August 2020. Results A total of 22 studies were found in the study period. Recent studies of aaPET with DWI showed a superiority of MET, FET, FDOPA, and AMT PET for detecting tumor, predicting recurrence, diagnosing progression, and predicting survival. Combining modalities further improved performance. Comparisons of aaPET with PWI showed mixed results about spatial correlation. However, both modalities were able to detect high-grade tumors, identify tumor recurrence, differentiate recurrence from treatment effects, and predict survival. aaPET performed better on these measures than PWI, but when combined, they had the strongest results. Studies of aaPET with MRS demonstrated that both modalities have diagnostic potential but MET PET and FDOPA PET performed better than MRS. MRS suffered from some data quality issues that limited analysis in two studies, and, in one study that combined modalities, overall performance actually decreased. Four recent studies compared aaPET with emerging MRI approaches (such as CEST imaging, MR fingerprinting, and SISTINA), but the initial results remain inconclusive. Conclusions aaPET outperformed the aMRI imaging techniques in most recent studies. DWI and PWI added meaningful complementary data, and the combination of aaPET with aMRI yielded the best results in most studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shankar A, Bomanji J, Hyare H. Hybrid PET-MRI Imaging in Paediatric and TYA Brain Tumours: Clinical Applications and Challenges. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040218. [PMID: 33182433 PMCID: PMC7711629 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for brain tumour imaging in paediatric and teenage and young adult (TYA) patients. Combining positron emission tomography (PET) with MRI offers an opportunity to improve diagnostic accuracy. (2) Method: Our single-centre experience of 18F-fluorocholine (FCho) and 18fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) PET–MRI in paediatric/TYA neuro-oncology patients is presented. (3) Results: Hybrid PET–MRI shows promise in the evaluation of gliomas and germ cell tumours in (i) assessing early treatment response and (ii) discriminating tumour from treatment-related changes. (4) Conclusions: Combined PET–MRI shows promise for improved diagnostic and therapeutic assessment in paediatric and TYA brain tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananth Shankar
- Children and Young People’s Cancer Services, University College London hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-20-3447-9950
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
| | - Harpreet Hyare
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Somme F, Bender L, Namer IJ, Noël G, Bund C. Usefulness of 18F-FDOPA PET for the management of primary brain tumors: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:70. [PMID: 33023662 PMCID: PMC7541204 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is currently the standard of care in the management of primary brain tumors, although certain limitations remain. Metabolic imaging has proven useful for an increasing number of indications in oncology over the past few years, most particularly 18F-FDG PET/CT. In neuro-oncology, 18F-FDG was insufficient to clearly evaluate brain tumors. Amino-acid radiotracers such as 18F-FDOPA were then evaluated in the management of brain diseases, notably tumoral diseases. Even though European guidelines on the use of amino-acid PET in gliomas have been published, it is crucial that future studies standardize acquisition and interpretation parameters. The aim of this article was to systematically review the potential effect of this metabolic imaging technique in numerous steps of the disease: primary and recurrence diagnosis, grading, local and systemic treatment assessment, and prognosis. A total of 41 articles were included and analyzed in this review. It appears that 18F-FDOPA PET holds promise as an effective additional tool in the management of gliomas. More consistent prospective studies are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Somme
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Laura Bender
- Oncology Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Izzie Jacques Namer
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
- Strasbourg University, Unistra/CNRS UMR 7237, Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3, rue de la porte de l'hôpital, F-67065, Strasbourg, France
- Strasbourg University, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Centre Paul Strauss, UNICANCER, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Caroline Bund
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Diagnosing brain tumor recurrence, especially with changes that occur after treatment, is a challenge. MRI has an exceptional structural resolution, which is important from the perspective of treatment planning. However, its reliability in diagnosing recurrence is relatively lower, when compared to metabolic imaging. The latter is more sensitive to the early changes associated with recurrence and relatively immune to confounding by treatment related changes. CONCLUSION. There is no one-stop shop for the diagnosis of recurrence in brain tumors. The sensitivity of metabolic imaging is not a substitute for the resolution of the MRI, making a multi-modal approach the only way forward.
Collapse
|
22
|
Soni N, Ora M, Mohindra N, Menda Y, Bathla G. Diagnostic Performance of PET and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Tumor Recurrence or Progression from Radiation Necrosis in Posttreatment Gliomas: A Review of Literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:1550-1557. [PMID: 32855194 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Tumor resection followed by chemoradiation remains the current criterion standard treatment for high-grade gliomas. Regardless of aggressive treatment, tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis are 2 different outcomes. Differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis remains a critical problem in these patients because of considerable overlap in clinical and imaging presentations. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the universal imaging technique for diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and detection of recurrence of high-grade gliomas. PWI and PET with novel radiotracers have an evolving role for monitoring treatment response in high-grade gliomas. In the literature, there is no clear consensus on the superiority of either technique or their complementary information. This review aims to elucidate the diagnostic performance of individual and combined use of functional (PWI) and metabolic (PET) imaging modalities to distinguish recurrence from posttreatment changes in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Soni
- Department of Radiology (N.S., Y.M., G.B.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - M Ora
- Department of Radiodiagnosis (M.O., N.M.), Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Lucknow, India
| | - N Mohindra
- Department of Radiodiagnosis (M.O., N.M.), Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Lucknow, India
| | - Y Menda
- Department of Radiology (N.S., Y.M., G.B.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - G Bathla
- Department of Radiology (N.S., Y.M., G.B.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
John F, Robinette NL, Amit-Yousif AJ, Bosnyák E, Barger GR, Shah KD, Mittal S, Juhász C. Multimodal Imaging of Nonenhancing Glioblastoma Regions. Mol Imaging 2020; 18:1536012119885222. [PMID: 31736437 PMCID: PMC6862774 DOI: 10.1177/1536012119885222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical glioblastoma treatment mostly focuses on the contrast-enhancing tumor mass. Amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) can detect additional, nonenhancing glioblastoma-infiltrated brain regions that are difficult to distinguish on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We combined MRI with perfusion imaging and amino acid PET to evaluate such nonenhancing glioblastoma regions. METHODS Structural MRI, relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) maps from perfusion MRI, and α-[11C]-methyl-l-tryptophan (AMT)-PET images were analyzed in 20 patients with glioblastoma. The AMT uptake and rCBV (expressed as tumor to normal [T/N] ratios) were compared in nonenhancing tumor portions showing increased signal on T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2/FLAIR) images. RESULTS Thirteen (65%) tumors showed robust heterogeneity in nonenhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintense areas on AMT-PET, whereas the nonenhancing regions in the remaining 7 cases had homogeneous AMT uptake (low in 6, high in 1). AMT and rCBV T/N ratios showed only a moderate correlation in the nonenhancing regions (r = 0.41, P = .017), but regions with very low rCBV (<0.79 T/N ratio) had invariably low AMT uptake. CONCLUSIONS The findings demonstrate the metabolic and perfusion heterogeneity of nonenhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintense glioblastoma regions. Amino acid PET imaging of such regions can detect glioma-infiltrated brain for treatment targeting; however, very low rCBV values outside the contrast-enhancing tumor mass make increased AMT uptake in nonenhancing glioblastoma regions unlikely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flóra John
- Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University and PET Center and Translational Imaging Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Natasha L Robinette
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alit J Amit-Yousif
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Edit Bosnyák
- Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University and PET Center and Translational Imaging Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Geoffrey R Barger
- Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Keval D Shah
- Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Sandeep Mittal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.,Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.,Virginia Tech School of Neuroscience, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Csaba Juhász
- Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University and PET Center and Translational Imaging Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.,Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Werner JM, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors. Molecules 2020; 25:E1471. [PMID: 32213992 PMCID: PMC7146177 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of positron-emission tomography (PET) tracers used to evaluate patients with brain tumors has increased substantially over the last years. For the management of patients with brain tumors, the most important indications are the delineation of tumor extent (e.g., for planning of resection or radiotherapy), the assessment of treatment response to systemic treatment options such as alkylating chemotherapy, and the differentiation of treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis) from tumor progression. Furthermore, newer PET imaging approaches aim to address the need for noninvasive assessment of tumoral immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapies (e.g., T-cell imaging). This review summarizes the clinical value of the landscape of tracers that have been used in recent years for the above-mentioned indications and also provides an overview of promising newer tracers for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Langen KJ, Heinzel A, Lohmann P, Mottaghy FM, Galldiks N. Advantages and limitations of amino acid PET for tracking therapy response in glioma patients. Expert Rev Neurother 2019; 20:137-146. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1704256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Section JARA-Brain, Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Juelich-Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Section JARA-Brain, Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Juelich-Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Felix M. Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Section JARA-Brain, Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Juelich-Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Centre of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology1, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Centre of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Moreau A, Febvey O, Mognetti T, Frappaz D, Kryza D. Contribution of Different Positron Emission Tomography Tracers in Glioma Management: Focus on Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1134. [PMID: 31737567 PMCID: PMC6839136 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although rare, glioblastomas account for the majority of primary brain lesions, with a dreadful prognosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the imaging method providing the higher resolution. However, it does not always succeed in distinguishing recurrences from non-specific temozolomide, have been shown to improve -related changes caused by the combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, also called pseudoprogression. Strenuous attempts to overcome this issue is highly required for these patients with a short life expectancy for both ethical and economic reasons. Additional reliable information may be obtained from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The development of this technique, along with the emerging of new classes of tracers, can help in the diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of therapies. We reviewed the current data about the commonly used tracers, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and radiolabeled amino acids, as well as different PET tracers recently investigated, to report their strengths, limitations, and relevance in glioblastoma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Kryza
- UNIV Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LAGEPP UMR 5007 CNRS Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with primary brain tumors after treatment: is the outcome of [ 18F] FDOPA PET a prognostic factor in these patients? Ann Nucl Med 2019; 33:471-480. [PMID: 30949937 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01355-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) in a population affected by primary brain tumors (PBT) evaluated by [18F]-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F] FDOPA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS 133 subjects with PBT (65 women and 68 men, mean age 45 ± 10 years old) underwent 18F FDOPA PET/CT after treatment. Of them, 68 (51.2%) were Grade II, 34 (25.5%) were Grade III and 31 (23.3%) were Grade IV. PET/CT was scored as positive or negative and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) was calculated as the ratio between SUVmax of the lesion vs. that of the background. Patients have been observed for a mean of 24 months. RESULTS The outcome of [18F] FDOPA PET/CT scan was significantly related to the OS and PFS in Grade II gliomas. In Grade II PBT, the OS proportions at 24 months were 100% in subjects with a negative PET/CT scan and 82% in those with a positive scan. Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test showed a significant difference in the OS curves (P = 0.03) and the hazard-ratio was equal to 5.1 (95% CI of ratio 1.1-23.88). As for PFS, the proportion at 24 months was 90% in subjects with a negative PET/CT scan and 58% in those with a positive scan. Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test showed a significant difference in the OS curves (P = 0.007) and the hazard-ratio was equal to 4.1 (95% CI of ratio 1.3-8). We did not find any significant relationship between PET outcome and OS and PFS in Grade III and IV PBT. CONCLUSIONS A positive [18F] FDOPA PET/CT scan is related to a poor OS and PFS in subjects with low-grade PBT. This imaging modality could be considered as a prognostic factor in these subjects.
Collapse
|
28
|
Comparisons Between PET With 11C-Methyl-L-Methionine and Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging in Recurrent Glioblastomas Treated With Bevacizumab. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44:186-193. [PMID: 30562194 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to clarify whether arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging can assess biological effects from bevacizumab (BEV) therapy as reliably as PET with C-methyl-L-methionine (C-met-PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four patients with recurrent glioblastoma were examined using both ASL and C-met-PET before and 4 and 8 weeks after starting BEV treatment. Tumor-to-normal brain (T/N) ratios, fluctuations in T/N ratio, and tumor volumes were compared between ASL and C-met-PET. Accuracy of predicting patient with long progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed for T/N ratios and fluctuations for ASL and C-met-PET in each phase and in each period using receiver operating characteristic curves. Between 2 groups of patients assigned by cutoff values from receiver operating characteristic curves, PFS was compared in each phase or in each period. RESULTS T/N ratios, fluctuations in ratio, and tumor volumes correlated significantly between ASL and C-met-PET at all time points and all periods. Arterial spin labeling was eligible as a predictor for long PFS only in assessment of fluctuations in T/N ratio. However, the most accurate predictors for long PFS were T/N ratio from C-met-PET at 8 weeks and the fluctuation from baseline to 4 weeks in T/N ratio from C-met-PET. CONCLUSIONS Blood flows on ASL correlated with accumulations of C-met on PET in recurrent glioblastoma under BEV treatment. Although C-met-PET offered superior accuracy for predicting patients with long PFS from time points, ASL offered reliable prediction of long PFS, provided that fluctuations in T/N ratio between consecutive scans are assessed.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to give an update on the emerging role of PET using radiolabelled amino acids in the diagnostic workup and management of patients with cerebral gliomas and brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of PET using radiolabelled amino acids for differential diagnosis of brain tumours, delineation of tumour extent for treatment planning and biopsy guidance, differentiation between tumour progression and recurrence versus treatment-related changes, and for monitoring of therapy. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group - an international effort to develop new standardized response criteria for clinical trials in brain tumours - has recently recommended the use of amino acid PET imaging for brain tumour management in addition to MRI at every stage of disease. With the introduction of F-18 labelled amino acids, a broader clinical application has become possible, but is still hampered by the lack of regulatory approval and of reimbursement in many countries. SUMMARY PET using radiolabelled amino acids is a rapidly evolving method that can significantly enhance the diagnostic value of MRI in brain tumours. Current developments suggest that this imaging technique will become an indispensable tool in neuro-oncological centres in the near future.
Collapse
|
30
|
Shah NJ, da Silva NA, Yun SD. Perfusion weighted imaging using combined gradient/spin echo EPIK: Brain tumour applications in hybrid MR-PET. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 42:4144-4154. [PMID: 30761676 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) methods that combine gradient echo (GE) and spin echo (SE) data are important tools for the study of brain tumours. In PWI, single-shot, EPI-based methods have been widely used due to their relatively high imaging speed. However, when used with increasing spatial resolution, single-shot EPI methods often show limitations in whole-brain coverage for multi-contrast applications. To overcome this limitation, this work employs a new version of EPI with keyhole (EPIK) to provide five echoes: two with GEs, two with mixed GESE and one with SE; the sequence is termed "GESE-EPIK." The performance of GESE-EPIK is evaluated against its nearest relative, EPI, in terms of the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR). Here, data from brain tumour patients were acquired using a hybrid 3T MR-BrainPET scanner. GESE-EPIK resulted in reduced susceptibility artefacts, shorter TEs for the five echoes and increased brain coverage when compared to EPI. Moreover, compared to EPI, EPIK achieved a comparable tSNR for the first and second echoes and significantly higher tSNR for other echoes. A new method to obtain multi-echo GE and SE data with shorter TEs and increased brain coverage is demonstrated. As proposed here, the workflow can be shortened and the integration of multimodal clinical MR-PET studies can be facilitated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Medical Imaging Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience-11, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, JARA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Monash Biomedical Imaging, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nuno André da Silva
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Medical Imaging Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
| | - Seong Dae Yun
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Medical Imaging Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lohmann P, Werner JM, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Combined Amino Acid Positron Emission Tomography and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11020153. [PMID: 30699942 PMCID: PMC6406895 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide valuable information about brain tumor patients. Particularly amino acid PET, advanced MRI techniques, and combinations thereof are of great interest for the non-invasive assessment of biological characteristics in patients with primary or secondary brain cancer. A methodological innovation that potentially advances research in patients with brain tumors is the increasing availability of hybrid PET/MRI systems, which enables the simultaneous acquisition of both imaging modalities. Furthermore, the advent of ultra-high field MRI scanners operating at magnetic field strengths of 7 T or more will allow further development of metabolic MR imaging at higher resolution. This review focuses on the combination of amino acid PET with MR spectroscopic imaging, perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging, as well as chemical exchange saturation transfer in patients with high-grade gliomas, especially glioblastomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5, -11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - N Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5, -11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
- JARA-BRAIN-Translational Medicine, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5, -11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5, -11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5, -11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The mean striatal 18F-DOPA uptake is not a reliable cut-off threshold for biological tumour volume definition of glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:1051-1053. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-4276-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
33
|
Helali M, Moreau M, Le Fèvre C, Heimburger C, Bund C, Goichot B, Veillon F, Hubelé F, Charpiot A, Noel G, Imperiale A. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT Combined with MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Patients with Skull Base Paraganglioma. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11010054. [PMID: 30626096 PMCID: PMC6360018 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this simulation study, we assessed differences in gross tumor volume (GTV) in a series of skull base paragangliomas (SBPGLs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and 18F-FDOPA PET/MRI images obtained by rigid alignment of PET and MRI. GTV was delineated in 16 patients with SBPGLs on MRI (GTVMRI), 18F-FDOPA PET/CT (GTVPET), and combined PET/MRI (GTVPET/MRI). GTVPET/MRI was the union of GTVMRI and GTVPET after visual adjustment. Three observers delineated GTVMRI and GTVPET/MRI independently. Excellent interobserver reproducibility was found for both GTVMRI and GTVPET/MRI. GTVPET and GTVMRI were not significantly different. However, there was some spatial difference between the locations of GTVMRI, GTVPET, and GTVPET/MRI. The Dice similarity coefficient median value was 0.4 between PET/CT and MRI, and 0.8 between MRI and PET/MRI. The combined use of PET/MRI produced a larger GTV than MRI alone. Nevertheless, both the target-delivered dose and organs-at-risk conservancy were respected when treatment was planned on the PET/MRI-matched data set. Future integration of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT into clinical practice will be necessary to evaluate the influence of this diagnostic modality on SBPGL therapeutic management. If the clinical utility of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT and/or PET/MRI is confirmed, GTVPET/MRI should be considered for tailored radiotherapy planning in patients with SBPGL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Helali
- Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Matthieu Moreau
- Radiophysics, Centre Paul-Strauss, UNICANCER, 67065 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Radiotherapy, Centre Paul-Strauss, 67065 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Céline Heimburger
- Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
- ICube, University of Strasbourg/CNRS (UMR 7357) and FMTS, Faculty of Medicine, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Caroline Bund
- Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
- ICube, University of Strasbourg/CNRS (UMR 7357) and FMTS, Faculty of Medicine, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Bernard Goichot
- Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Francis Veillon
- Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Fabrice Hubelé
- Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
- ICube, University of Strasbourg/CNRS (UMR 7357) and FMTS, Faculty of Medicine, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Anne Charpiot
- Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Georges Noel
- Radiotherapy, Centre Paul-Strauss, 67065 Strasbourg, France.
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Centre Paul Strauss, UNICANCER, 67065 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
- ICube, University of Strasbourg/CNRS (UMR 7357) and FMTS, Faculty of Medicine, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Press RH, Zhong J, Gurbani SS, Weinberg BD, Eaton BR, Shim H, Shu HKG. The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint. Neurosurgery 2018; 85:165-179. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the overall management of many central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Advances in RT treatment planning, with techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery, now allow the delivery of highly conformal dose with great precision. These techniques rely on high-resolution 3-dimensional anatomical imaging modalities such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to accurately and reliably define CNS targets and normal tissue avoidance structures. The integration of cross-sectional imaging into radiation oncology has directly translated into improvements in the therapeutic window of RT, and the union between radiation oncology and imaging is only expected to grow stronger. In addition, advanced imaging modalities including diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopic MRIs as well as positron emission tomography (PET) scans with novel tracers are being utilized to provide additional insight into tumor biology and behavior beyond anatomy. Together, these standard and advanced imaging modalities hold significant potential to improve future RT delivery and response assessment. In this review, we will discuss the current utilization of standard/advanced imaging for CNS tumors from a radiation oncology perspective as well as the implications of novel MRI and PET modalities currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Saumya S Gurbani
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brent D Weinberg
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hui-Kuo G Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Emerging Role of Amino Acid PET in Neuro-Oncology. Bioengineering (Basel) 2018; 5:bioengineering5040104. [PMID: 30487391 PMCID: PMC6315339 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5040104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a critical role in the management of the highly complex and widely diverse central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in providing an accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, response assessment, prognosis, and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary modality for CNS disease management due to its high contrast resolution, reasonable spatial resolution, and relatively low cost and risk. However, defining tumor response to radiation treatment and chemotherapy by contrast-enhanced MRI is often difficult due to various factors that can influence contrast agent distribution and perfusion, such as edema, necrosis, vascular alterations, and inflammation, leading to pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse assessments. Amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) is emerging as the method of resolving such equivocal lesion interpretations. Amino acid radiotracers can more specifically differentiate true tumor boundaries from equivocal lesions based on their specific and active uptake by the highly metabolic cellular component of CNS tumors. These therapy-induced metabolic changes detected by amino acid PET facilitate early treatment response assessments. Integrating amino acid PET in the management of CNS malignancies to complement MRI will significantly improve early therapy response assessment, treatment planning, and clinical trial design.
Collapse
|
36
|
Roodakker KR, Alhuseinalkhudhur A, Al-Jaff M, Georganaki M, Zetterling M, Berntsson SG, Danfors T, Strand R, Edqvist PH, Dimberg A, Larsson EM, Smits A. Region-by-region analysis of PET, MRI, and histology in en bloc-resected oligodendrogliomas reveals intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:569-579. [PMID: 30109401 PMCID: PMC6351509 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Oligodendrogliomas are heterogeneous tumors in terms of imaging appearance, and a deeper understanding of the histopathological tumor characteristics in correlation to imaging parameters is needed. We used PET-to-MRI-to-histology co-registration with the aim of studying intra-tumoral 11C-methionine (MET) uptake in relation to tumor perfusion and the protein expression of histological cell markers in corresponding areas. Methods Consecutive histological sections of four tumors covering the entire en bloc-removed tumor were immunostained with antibodies against IDH1-mutated protein (tumor cells), Ki67 (proliferating cells), and CD34 (blood vessels). Software was developed for anatomical landmarks-based co-registration of subsequent histological images, which were overlaid on corresponding MET PET scans and MRI perfusion maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) on PET were selected throughout the entire tumor volume, covering hot spot areas, areas adjacent to hot spots, and tumor borders with infiltrating zone. Tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratios of MET uptake and mean relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) were measured in the ROIs and protein expression of histological cell markers was quantified in corresponding regions. Statistical correlations were calculated between MET uptake, rCBV, and quantified protein expression. Results A total of 84 ROIs were selected in four oligodendrogliomas. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) between MET uptake and tumor cell density was demonstrated in all tumors separately. In two tumors, MET correlated with the density of proliferating cells and vessel cell density. There were no significant correlations between MET uptake and rCBV, and between rCBV and histological cell markers. Conclusions The MET uptake in hot spots, outside hotspots, and in infiltrating tumor edges unanimously reflects tumor cell density. The correlation between MET uptake and vessel density and density of proliferating cells is less stringent in infiltrating tumor edges and is probably more susceptible to artifacts caused by larger blood vessels surrounding the tumor. Although based on a limited number of samples, this study provides histological proof for MET as an indicator of tumor cell density and for the lack of statistically significant correlations between rCBV and histological cell markers in oligodendrogliomas. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-018-4107-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenney Roy Roodakker
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, University Hospital, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Ali Alhuseinalkhudhur
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, University Hospital, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mohammed Al-Jaff
- Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Georganaki
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Zetterling
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Shala G Berntsson
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, University Hospital, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Torsten Danfors
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Robin Strand
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per-Henrik Edqvist
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Dimberg
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elna-Marie Larsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anja Smits
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, University Hospital, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Verger A, Arbizu J, Law I. Role of amino-acid PET in high-grade gliomas: limitations and perspectives. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:254-266. [PMID: 29696948 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03092-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled amino-acids was recently recommended by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group as an additional tool in the diagnostic assessment of brain tumors. The aim of this review is to summarize available literature data on the role of amino-acid PET imaging in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), with regard to diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up of these tumors. Indeed, amino-acid PET applications are multiple throughout the evolution of HGGs. However, certain limitations such as lack of specificity, uncertain value for grading and prognostication or the limited data for treatment monitoring should to be taken into account, the latter of which are further developed in this review. Notwithstanding these limitations, amino-acid PET is becoming increasingly accessible in many nuclear medicine centers. Larger prospective cohort prospective studies are thus needed in order to increase the clinical value of this modality and enable its extended use to the largest number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France - .,IADI, INSERM, Lorraine University, Nancy, France -
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brendle C, Hempel JM, Schittenhelm J, Skardelly M, Reischl G, Bender B, Ernemann U, la Fougère C, Klose U. Glioma grading by dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and 11C-methionine positron emission tomography using different regions of interest. Neuroradiology 2018; 60:381-389. [PMID: 29464269 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-018-1993-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion and 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) for glioma grading is currently not standardized. The purpose of this study was to identify regions of interest (ROIs) that enable the best performance and clinical applicability in both methods, as well as to evaluate the complementarity of DSC perfusion and MET-PET in spatial hotspot definition. METHODS In 41 patient PET/MRI datasets, different ROIs were drawn: in T2-hyperintense tumour, in T2-hyperintense tumour and adjacent oedema and in tumour areas with contrast enhancement, altered perfusion or pathological radiotracer uptake. The performance of DSC perfusion and MET-PET using the different ROIs to distinguish high- and low-grade gliomas was assessed. The spatial overlap of hotspots identified by DSC perfusion and MET-PET was assessed visually. RESULTS ROIs in T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence-hyperintense tumour revealed the most significant differences between high- and low-grade gliomas and reached the highest diagnostic performance in both DSC perfusion (p = 0.046; area under the curve = 0.74) and MET-PET (p = 0.007; area under the curve = 0.80). The combination of methods yielded an area under the curve of 0.80. Hotspots were completely overlapped in one half of the patients, partially overlapped in one third of the patients and present in only one method in approximately 20% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS For multi-parametric examinations with DSC perfusion and MET-PET, we recommend an ROI definition based on T2-hyperintense tumour. DSC perfusion and MET-PET contain complementary information concerning the spatial hotspot definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Brendle
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Johann-Martin Hempel
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University, Liebermeistersstraße 8, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- University Hospital for Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gerald Reischl
- Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University, Roentgenweg 13, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bender
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Ernemann
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Nuclear Nedicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Otfried-Mueller-Straße 14, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Klose
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Carideo L, Minniti G, Mamede M, Scaringi C, Russo I, Scopinaro F, Cicone F. 18F-DOPA uptake parameters in glioma: effects of patients' characteristics and prior treatment history. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170847. [PMID: 29271230 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In amino acid positron emission tomography brain tumour imaging, tumour-to-background uptake parameters are often used for treatment monitoring. We studied the effects of patients' characteristics and anticancer treatments on 18F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine uptake of normal brain and tumour lesions, with particular emphasis on temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. METHODS 155 studies from 120 patients with glioma were analysed. Average uptake of normal background (standardized uptake value, SUVbckgr) and basal ganglia (SUVbg), as well as tumour-to-brain ratios (TBR) were compared between positron emission tomography/CT studies acquired before (Group A, n = 48), after (Group B, n = 50) or during (Group C, n = 57) TMZ treatment, using analysis of variance. RESULTS Overall, mean SUVbckgr and mean SUVbg were 1.06 ± 0.26 and 2.12 ± 0.47, respectively. Female had significantly higher SUVbckgr (p = 0.002) and SUVbg (p = 0.012) than male patients. Age showed a positive correlation with SUVbg (p = 0.001). In the overall cohort, there were significant effects of TMZ on SUVbckgr (p = 0.0237) and TBR (p = 0.0138). In particular, SUVbckgr was lower in Group C than in Group B (1.00 ± 0.25 vs 1.14 ± 0.31, p = 0.0173). Significant variations of SUVbckr could be observed in female only. TBR was significantly higher in Group C than in Group B (2.37 ± 0.54 vs 2.06 ± 0.38, p = 0.010). Variations of SUVbg between groups slightly missed significance (p = 0.0504). CONCLUSION Temozolomide chemotherapy and patients' characteristics, including gender and age, affect physiological [18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine uptake and, consequently, the calculation of TBRs. Advances in knowledge: For the first time, the effects of past or concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy on brain physiological amino acid uptake have been investigated. Such effects are relevant and should be taken into account when evaluating tumour-to-background ratios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Carideo
- 1 Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- 2 Radiotherapy, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy.,3 IRCCS Neuromed , Pozzilli (IS) , Italy
| | - Marcelo Mamede
- 4 Department of Anatomy and Imaging, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte , Brazil
| | - Claudia Scaringi
- 2 Radiotherapy, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Ivana Russo
- 2 Radiotherapy, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Francesco Scopinaro
- 1 Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Francesco Cicone
- 1 Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Recurrent Scapular Metastasis From Hepatoblastoma Shown on FDG PET/CT and F-DOPA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2017; 42:e449-e451. [DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000001786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
Despite the fact that MRI has evolved to become the standard method for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with brain tumours, conventional MRI sequences have two key limitations: the inability to show the full extent of the tumour and the inability to differentiate neoplastic tissue from nonspecific, treatment-related changes after surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy. In the past decade, PET involving the use of radiolabelled amino acids has developed into an important diagnostic tool to overcome some of the shortcomings of conventional MRI. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group - an international effort to develop new standardized response criteria for clinical trials in brain tumours - has recommended the additional use of amino acid PET imaging for brain tumour management. Concurrently, a number of advanced MRI techniques such as magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging and perfusion weighted imaging are under clinical evaluation to target the same diagnostic problems. This Review summarizes the clinical role of amino acid PET in relation to advanced MRI techniques for differential diagnosis of brain tumours; delineation of tumour extent for treatment planning and biopsy guidance; post-treatment differentiation between tumour progression or recurrence versus treatment-related changes; and monitoring response to therapy. An outlook for future developments in PET and MRI techniques is also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Josef-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology and Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.,Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Filss CP, Cicone F, Shah NJ, Galldiks N, Langen KJ. Amino acid PET and MR perfusion imaging in brain tumours. Clin Transl Imaging 2017; 5:209-223. [PMID: 28680873 PMCID: PMC5487907 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-017-0225-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Despite the excellent capacity of the conventional MRI to image brain tumours, problems remain in answering a number of critical diagnostic questions. To overcome these diagnostic shortcomings, PET using radiolabeled amino acids and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) are currently under clinical evaluation. The role of amino acid PET and PWI in different diagnostic challenges in brain tumours is controversial. Methods Based on the literature and experience of our centres in correlative imaging with PWI and PET using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine or 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine, the current role and shortcomings of amino acid PET and PWI in different diagnostic challenges in brain tumours are reviewed. Literature searches were performed on PubMed, and additional literature was retrieved from the reference lists of identified articles. In particular, all studies in which amino acid PET was directly compared with PWI were included. Results PWI is more readily available, but requires substantial expertise and is more sensitive to artifacts than amino acid PET. At initial diagnosis, PWI and amino acid PET can help to define a site for biopsy but amino acid PET appears to be more powerful to define the tumor extent. Both methods are helpful to differentiate progression or recurrence from unspecific posttherapeutic changes. Assessment of therapeutic efficacy can be achieved especially with amino acid PET, while the data with PWI are sparse. Conclusion Both PWI and amino acid PET add valuable diagnostic information to the conventional MRI in the assessment of patients with brain tumours, but further studies are necessary to explore the complementary nature of these two methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Filss
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Medicine Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.,JARA-Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany.,Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.,JARA-Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marner L, Henriksen OM, Lundemann M, Larsen VA, Law I. Clinical PET/MRI in neurooncology: opportunities and challenges from a single-institution perspective. Clin Transl Imaging 2016; 5:135-149. [PMID: 28936429 PMCID: PMC5581366 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-016-0213-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in neurooncology, i.e., for diagnosis, treatment evaluation and detection of recurrence. However, standard MRI cannot always separate malignant tissue from other pathologies or treatment-induced changes. Advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion imaging and spectroscopy show promising results in discriminating malignant from benign lesions. Further, supplemental imaging with amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to increase accuracy significantly and is used routinely at an increasing number of sites. Several centers are now implementing hybrid PET/MRI systems allowing for multiparametric imaging, combining conventional MRI with advanced MRI and amino acid PET imaging. Neurooncology is an obvious focus area for PET/MR imaging. Methods Based on the literature and our experience from more than 300 PET/MRI examinations of brain tumors with 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine, the clinical use of PET/MRI in adult and pediatric neurooncology is critically reviewed. Results Although the results are increasingly promising, the added value and range of indications for multiparametric imaging with PET/MRI are yet to be established. Robust solutions to overcome the number of issues when using a PET/MRI scanner are being developed, which is promising for a more routine use in the future. Conclusions In a clinical setting, a PET/MRI scan may increase accuracy in discriminating recurrence from treatment changes, although sequential same-day imaging on separate systems will often constitute a reliable and cost-effective alternative. Pediatric patients who require general anesthesia will benefit the most from simultaneous PET and MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Marner
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Otto M Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Lundemann
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cicone F, Clerico A, Minniti G, Paiano M, Carideo L, Scaringi C, Langen KJ, Scopinaro F. 18F-DOPA Positron Emission Tomography in Medulloblastoma: 2 Case Reports. World Neurosurg 2016; 93:490.e7-490.e11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Revised: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Rossi Espagnet MC, Romano A, Mancuso V, Cicone F, Napolitano A, Scaringi C, Minniti G, Bozzao A. Multiparametric evaluation of low grade gliomas at follow-up: comparison between diffusion and perfusion MR with (18)F-FDOPA PET. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160476. [PMID: 27505026 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare MRI using perfusion and diffusion techniques with 6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) in the follow-up of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and to identify the best imaging parameter to differentiate patients with different prognosis. METHODS Between 2010 and 2015, 12 patients with a pathology-proven diagnosis of LGG and MR (with perfusion and diffusion sequences) and a PET study during their follow-up were retrospectively included in our study. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps on MR studies and PET images were evaluated using a region of interest-based method. All patients were categorized as stable or as having progressive disease at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation test and multivariate analysis of variance (p < 0.05). RESULTS No significant correlations were found between PET parameters [maximum tumour-to-controlateral normal brain ratio (T/Nmax) and tumour-to-striatum ratio] and ADC or relative CBV values measured in both PET hotspot regions and areas of maximum signal alterations. T/Nmax demonstrated a good sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%) for differentiating two subgroups of patients with different outcomes at 1-year-follow-up (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Perfusion and diffusion MR images provide different information compared with (18)F-FDOPA PET in LGGs during follow-up and therefore, they should be considered as complementary tools in the evaluation of these tumours. (18)F-FDOPA PET showed a significant prognostic role in the follow-up of LGGs and appeared to be a better tool than MR advanced techniques for outcome prediction. These results need to be confirmed with longitudinal studies on a larger population. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first study that compared (18)F-FDOPA PET with perfusion and diffusion MR in LGGs during follow-up. These preliminary results highlight the importance of a multimodality approach in this field and evidence a potential role for (18)F-FDOPA PET to predict patients at risk for tumour progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Rossi Espagnet
- 1 NESMOS Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,2 Neuroradiology Unit, Imaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Romano
- 1 NESMOS Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Mancuso
- 1 NESMOS Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cicone
- 3 Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Napolitano
- 4 Enterprise Risk Management, Medical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Scaringi
- 5 Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- 5 Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- 1 NESMOS Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, la Fougère C, Pope W, Law I, Arbizu J, Chamberlain MC, Vogelbaum M, Ellingson BM, Tonn JC. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:1199-208. [PMID: 27106405 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 475] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This guideline provides recommendations for the use of PET imaging in gliomas. The review examines established clinical benefit in glioma patients of PET using glucose ((18)F-FDG) and amino acid tracers ((11)C-MET, (18)F-FET, and (18)F-FDOPA). An increasing number of studies have been published on PET imaging in the setting of diagnosis, biopsy, and resection as well radiotherapy planning, treatment monitoring, and response assessment. Recommendations are based on evidence generated from studies which validated PET findings by histology or clinical course. This guideline emphasizes the clinical value of PET imaging with superiority of amino acid PET over glucose PET and provides a framework for the use of PET to assist in the management of patients with gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Whitney Pope
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Marc C Chamberlain
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Michael Vogelbaum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Ben M Ellingson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (N.L.A.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany (B.S., J.C.T.); Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy (R.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.M.K.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.l.F.); Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (W.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (I.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (J.A.); Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.A.V.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:426-34. [PMID: 26243791 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the past decade (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) have been used for the assessment of patients with brain tumor. However, direct comparison studies reported only limited numbers of patients. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of FET and FDG-PET. METHODS We examined studies published between January 1995 and January 2015 in the PubMed database. To be included the study should: (i) use FET and FDG-PET for the assessment of patients with isolated brain lesion and (ii) use histology as the gold standard. Analysis was performed on a per patient basis. Study quality was assessed with STARD and QUADAS criteria. RESULTS Five studies (119 patients) were included. For the diagnosis of brain tumor, FET-PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-0.98) and pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.1 (95% CI: 0.8-80.6), and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-0.30), while FDG-PET demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.50) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.31-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.36-0.44), an LR+ of 2.7 (95% CI: 0.3-27.8), and an LR- of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.47-1.11). Target-to-background ratios of either FDG or FET, however, allow distinction between low- and high-grade gliomas (P > .11). CONCLUSIONS For brain tumor diagnosis, FET-PET performed much better than FDG and should be preferred when assessing a new isolated brain tumor. For glioma grading, however, both tracers showed similar performances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Dunet
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Anastasia Pomoni
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Andreas Hottinger
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - Marie Nicod-Lalonde
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| | - John O Prior
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (V.D.); Nuclear Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.P., M.N.-L., J.O.P.); Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.); Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Pope WB. From the clinician's point of view - What is the status quo of positron emission tomography in patients with brain tumors? Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:1434-44. [PMID: 26130743 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/31/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The most common type of primary brain tumor is malignant glioma. Despite intensive therapeutic efforts, the majority of these neoplasms remain incurable. Imaging techniques are important for initial tumor detection and comprise indispensable tools for monitoring treatment. Structural imaging using contrast-enhanced MRI is the method of choice for brain tumor surveillance, but its capacity to differentiate tumor from nonspecific tissue changes can be limited, particularly with posttreatment gliomas. Metabolic imaging using positron-emission-tomography (PET) can provide relevant additional information, which may allow for better assessment of tumor burden in ambiguous cases. Specific PET tracers have addressed numerous molecular targets in the last decades, but only a few have achieved relevance in routine clinical practice. At present, PET studies using radiolabeled amino acids appear to improve clinical decision-making as these tracers can offer better delineation of tumor extent as well as improved targeting of biopsies, surgical interventions, and radiation therapy. Amino acid PET imaging also appears useful for distinguishing glioma recurrence or progression from postradiation treatment effects, particularly radiation necrosis and pseudoprogression, and provides information on histological grading and patient prognosis. In the last decade, the tracers O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) have been increasingly used for these indications. This review article focuses on these tracers and summarizes their recent applications for patients with brain tumors. Current uses of tracers other than FET and FDOPA are also discussed, and the most frequent practical questions regarding PET brain tumor imaging are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|