Comprehensive anatomical and functional imaging in patients with type I neurofibromatosis using simultaneous FDG-PET/MRI

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: whole-body staging in sarcoma, non-malignant entities requiring special algorithms, pitfalls and special imaging aspects. Guidelines 2024 from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)

OBJECTIVES

The revised European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus guidelines on soft tissue tumor imaging represent an update of 2015 after technical advancements, further insights into specific entities, and revised World Health Organization (2020) and AJCC (2017) classifications. This second of three papers covers algorithms once histology is confirmed: (1) standardized whole-body staging, (2) special algorithms for non-malignant entities, and (3) multiplicity, genetic tumor syndromes, and pitfalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements that had undergone interdisciplinary revision were scored online by the level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds, that could result in 'group consensus', 'group agreement', or 'lack of agreement'.

RESULTS

The three sections contain 24 statements with comments. Group consensus was reached in 95.8% and group agreement in 4.2%. For whole-body staging, pulmonary MDCT should be performed in all high-grade sarcomas. Whole-body MRI is preferred for staging bone metastasis, with [18F]FDG-PET/CT as an alternative modality in PET-avid tumors. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, and angiosarcoma should be screened for brain metastases. Special algorithms are recommended for entities such as rhabdomyosarcoma, extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and neurofibromatosis type 1 associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Satisfaction of search should be avoided in potential multiplicity.

CONCLUSION

Standardized whole-body staging includes pulmonary MDCT in all high-grade sarcomas; entity-dependent modifications and specific algorithms are recommended for sarcomas and non-malignant soft tissue tumors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

These updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide support in decision-making, helping to avoid common pitfalls, by providing general and entity-specific algorithms, techniques, and reporting recommendations for whole-body staging in sarcoma and non-malignant soft tissue tumors.

KEY POINTS

An early, accurate, diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue tumors. These updated guidelines provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging algorithms, techniques, and reporting. Standardization can improve the comparability examinations and provide databases for large data analysis.

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor, a Heterogeneous, Aggressive Cancer with Diverse Biomarkers and No Targeted Standard of Care: Review of the Literature and Ongoing Investigational Agents

BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare, aggressive form of soft-tissue sarcoma that presents a unique set of diagnostic and treatment challenges and is associated with major unmet treatment medical needs.

OBJECTIVE

The chief aim of this review is to consider the epidemiology, histology, anatomic distribution, pathologic signaling pathways, diagnosis, and management of MPNST, with a focus on potential targeted therapies. A subordinate objective was to establish benchmarks for the antitumor activity of such treatments.

RESULTS

MPNST has an incidence of 1:100,000 in the general population and 1:3500 among patients with the inherited condition of neurofibromatosis-1. Spindle-cell sarcomas of neural-crest origin, MPNSTs are frequently situated in the extremities and pelvis/trunk, often at the confluence of large nerve roots and bundles. Highly copy-number aberrant and enriched in chromosome 8, MPNSTs have a complex molecular pathogenesis that likely involves the interplay of multiple signaling pathways, including Ras/AKT/mTOR/MAPK, EGFR, p53, PTEN, and PRC2, as well as factors in the tumor microenvironment. A combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) enables comprehensive assessment of both morphology and metabolism, while MRI- and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy can confirm histopathology. Although surgery with wide excisional margins is now the chief curative approach to localized disease, MPNST-specific survival has not improved in decades. For advanced and metastatic MPNST, radiation and chemotherapy (chiefly with anthracyclines plus ifosfamide) have somewhat promising but still largely uncertain treatment roles, chiefly in local control, downstaging, and palliation. No single druggable target has emerged, no objective responses have been observed with a number of targeted therapies (cumulative disease control rate in our review = 22.9-34.8%), and combinatorial approaches directed toward multiple signal transduction mechanisms are hallmarks of ongoing clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in our understanding of the genetics and molecular biology of MPNST, further research is warranted to: (1) unravel the complex pathogenesis of this condition; (2) improve diagnostic yield; (3) delineate the appropriate roles of chemotherapy and radiation; and (4) develop a targeted therapy (or combination of such treatments) that is well tolerated and prolongs survival.

Preoperative Classification of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors on MRI Using Radiomics

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft-tissue tumors prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, posing a significant risk of metastasis and recurrence. Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging lacks decisiveness in distinguishing benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (BPNSTs) and MPNSTs, necessitating invasive biopsies. This study aims to develop a radiomics model using quantitative imaging features and machine learning to distinguish MPNSTs from BPNSTs. Clinical data and MRIs from MPNST and BPNST patients (2000-2019) were collected at a tertiary sarcoma referral center. Lesions were manually and semi-automatically segmented on MRI scans, and radiomics features were extracted using the Workflow for Optimal Radiomics Classification (WORC) algorithm, employing automated machine learning. The evaluation was conducted using a 100× random-split cross-validation. A total of 35 MPNSTs and 74 BPNSTs were included. The T1-weighted (T1w) MRI radiomics model outperformed others with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. The incorporation of additional MRI scans did not enhance performance. Combining T1w MRI with clinical features achieved an AUC of 0.74. Experienced radiologists achieved AUCs of 0.75 and 0.66, respectively. Radiomics based on T1w MRI scans and clinical features show some ability to distinguish MPNSTs from BPNSTs, potentially aiding in the management of these tumors.

Case report: Solitary mass of the sciatic nerve confirmed as a primary extranodal manifestation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a geriatric patient

Background

Neoplastic lesions affecting peripheral nerves are rare in the general population and, most often, are benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors. However, a minority of lesions represent high-grade malignancies associated with a poor prognosis, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). Very rarely, these tumors represent peripheral non-nerve sheath tumors (PNNSTs), such as hematological neoplasms that impair nerve function. These can be hard to distinguish from MPNSTs and other lesions arising from the nerve itself. In the present case report, we describe a rare case of direct infiltration of nerves by tumor cells of a hematological neoplasm.

Methods

We report the case of a 90-year-old woman with acute onset of right-sided foot palsy, sensory loss, and pain, caused by an extensive solitary mass of the sciatic nerve in the thigh. We present and discuss the clinical presentation, multimodal diagnostic procedures, and treatment.

Results

MRI of the right thigh and the caudal pelvis revealed a contrast-enhancing lesion infiltrating the sciatic nerve. Additionally performed staging imaging was non-revealing. After multidisciplinary discussion in the neuro-oncology tumor board, a MPNST was suspected and the patient underwent radical tumor resection. However, final histopathology revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The patient received adjuvant palliative local radiotherapy which led to acceptable symptom control.

Conclusion

Rare PNNSTs, including extranodal manifestations of DLBCL can have similar clinical and radiological diagnostical features as PNSTs. Comprehensive diagnostic workup of contrast-enhancing lesions affecting peripheral nerves including MRI and metabolic imaging are recommended. Discussion in interdisciplinary tumor boards facilitates finding individual treatment approaches.

Utility of Targeted Positron Emission Tomography Imaging to Predict Schwannoma Growth in a Murine Tumor Model

OBJECTIVE

To identify if targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with radiolabeled antibodies can predict tumor growth rate and ultimate tumor size in a murine flank schwannoma model.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal research study.

METHODS

Rat schwannoma cells were cultured and implanted into 40 athymic nude mice. Once tumors reached 5 mm in diameter, 30 mice were injected with zirconium-89 labeled antibodies (HER2/Neu, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), or IgG isotype). PET/CT was performed, and standardized uptake values (SUV) were recorded. Tumors were serially measured until mice were sacrificed per IACUC protocol. Statistical analysis was performed to measure correlations between SUV values, tumor size, and growth.

RESULTS

Mean tumor sizes in mm3 on Day 0 were 144 ± 162 for anti-HER2/Neu, 212 ± 247 for anti-VEGFR2, and 172 ± 204 for IgG isotype groups respectively. Mean growth rates in mm3 /day were 531 ± 250 for HER2, 584 ± 188 for VEGFR2, and 416 ± 163 for the IgG isotype group. For both initial tumor size and growth rates, there was no significant difference between groups. There were significant correlations between maximum tumor volume and both the SUV max in the HER2 group (p = 0.0218, R2  = 0.5020), and we observed significant correlations between growth rate, and SUV values (p = 0.0156, R2  = 0.5394). Respectively, in the anti-VEGFR2 group, there were no significant correlations.

CONCLUSION

In a murine schwannoma model, immunotargeted PET imaging with anti-HER2/Neu antibodies predicted tumor growth rate and final tumor size. Laryngoscope, 134:1372-1380, 2024.

Direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT and MRI for the differentiation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour in neurofibromatosis type I: a meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the diagnostic test of integrated 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the differentiation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE (last updated in 30 November 2022). Studies investigating the performance of FDG PET/CT and MRI for differentiation of MPNSTs were eligible for inclusion. Only studies reporting a direct comparison between these imaging methods were considered to establish precise summary estimates in the same setting of patients.

RESULTS

The pooled estimate of sensitivity of FDG PET/CT was 0.99 and a pooled specificity of 0.53. The pooled estimate of sensitivity of MRI was 0.85 and a pooled specificity of 0.85.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the available studies indicated that FDG PET/CT and MRI had similar diagnostic performances for differentiation of MPNSTs in patients with NF1; however, either technique can be a complement to the other rather than being used singly.

Pediatric Imaging Using PET/MR Imaging

PET/MR imaging is a one-stop shop technique for pediatric diseases allowing not only an accurate clinical assessment of tumors at staging and restaging but also the diagnosis of neurologic, inflammatory, and infectious diseases in complex cases. Moreover, applying PET kinetic analyses and sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging as well as quantitative analysis investigating the relationship between disease metabolic activity and cellularity can be applied. Complex radiomics analysis can also be performed.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral and Cranial Nerve Tumors with Expert Recommendations: An EUropean Network for RAre CANcers (EURACAN) Initiative

The 2021 WHO classification of the CNS Tumors identifies as "Peripheral nerve sheath tumors" (PNST) some entities with specific clinical and anatomical characteristics, histological and molecular markers, imaging findings, and aggressiveness. The Task Force has reviewed the evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which is particularly low due to the rarity, and drawn recommendations accordingly. Tumor diagnosis is primarily based on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and immunohistochemistry. Molecular analysis is not essential to establish the histological nature of these tumors, although genetic analyses on DNA extracted from PNST (neurofibromas/schwannomas) is required to diagnose mosaic forms of NF1 and SPS. MRI is the gold-standard to delineate the extension with respect to adjacent structures. Gross-total resection is the first choice, and can be curative in benign lesions; however, the extent of resection must be balanced with preservation of nerve functioning. Radiotherapy can be omitted in benign tumors after complete resection and in NF-related tumors, due to the theoretic risk of secondary malignancies in a tumor-suppressor syndrome. Systemic therapy should be considered in incomplete resected plexiform neurofibromas/MPNSTs. MEK inhibitor selumetinib can be used in NF1 children ≥2 years with inoperable/symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas, while anthracycline-based treatment is the first choice for unresectable/locally advanced/metastatic MPNST. Clinical trials on other MEK1-2 inhibitors alone or in combination with mTOR inhibitors are under investigation in plexiform neurofibromas and MPNST, respectively.

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Latest Concepts in Disease Pathogenesis and Clinical Management

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is an aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. Although neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and radiation exposure have been identified as risk factors for MPNST, the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying MPNST pathogenesis have only lately been roughly elucidated. Plexiform neurofibroma (PN) and atypical neurofibromatous neoplasm of unknown biological potential (ANNUBP) are novel concepts of MPNST precancerous lesions, which revealed sequential mutations in MPNST development. This review summarized the current understanding of MPNST and the latest consensus from its diagnosis to treatment, with highlights on molecular biomarkers and targeted therapies. Additionally, we discussed the current challenges and prospects for MPNST management.

Evaluation of functional and metabolic tumor volume using voxel-wise analysis in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional imaging-based morphological characteristics of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma have failed to predict outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and possible value of generating tumor sub-volumes using voxel-wise analysis of metabolic and functional data from positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) or PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI in rhabdomyosarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four examinations in 17 patients who received PET/MRI or PET/CT plus MRI were analyzed. The volume of interest included total tumor volume before and after therapy. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and standard uptake values (SUV) were determined voxel-wise. Voxels were assigned to three different groups based on ADC and SUV: "viable tumor tissue," "intermediate tissue" or "possible necrosis." In a second approach, data were grouped into three clusters using the Gaussian mixture model. The ratio of these clusters to total tumor volume and changes due to chemotherapy were correlated with clinical and histopathological data.

RESULTS

After chemotherapy, the proportion of voxels in the different groups changed significantly. A significant reduction of the proportion of voxels assigned to cluster 1 was found, from a mean of 36.4% to 2.5% (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of voxels in cluster 3 following chemotherapy from 24.8% to 81.6% (P = 0.02). The proportion of voxels in cluster 2 differed depending on the presence or absence of tumor recurrence, falling from 48% to 10% post-chemotherapy in the group with no tumor recurrence (P < 0.05) and from 29% to 23% (P > 0.05) in the group with tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Voxel-wise evaluation of multimodal data in rhabdomyosarcoma is feasible. Our initial results suggest that the different distribution of sub-volumes before and after therapy may have prognostic significance.

[Whole-body MRI in cancer predisposition syndromes]

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has become established as the modality of choice for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of oncological diseases as well as for the screening of cancer predisposition syndromes, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

METHODS

As a comprehensive imaging modality without ionizing radiation, WB-MRI can be used repetitively and because of its excellent soft tissue contrast and high resolution provides early and precise detection of pathologies. This article discusses the technical requirements, some examination strategies and the clinical significance of typical findings of WB-MRI in patients with cancer predisposition syndromes.

Interdisciplinary surgical approach enables complete tumor resection with preservation of neurological function in specific conditions of pediatric solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Success of pediatric solid tumor surgery is regularly hampered by infiltration of essential neurovascular structures. A surgical dilemma arises when imaging data suggest a conflict between complete resection and preservation of neurological function. The aim of the study was to analyze data of children harboring tumors with involvement of neurovascular structure treated by an interdisciplinary pediatric surgical/neurosurgical team.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 25 children undergoing surgery for solid tumors, in whom preoperative imaging showed a relevant involvement of nerve structures. Surgery was simultaneously performed by a pediatric onco-surgeon and a pediatric neurosurgeon with peripheral nerve expertise, including intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring.

RESULTS

The following tumors were treated: NF1 associated neurofibromas (10), neuroblastomas (5), desmoid tumors (2), MPNST (2), ganglioneuroma (1), Ewing sarcoma (1), infantile fibromatosis (1), PNET (1), rhabdomyosarcoma (1), angiolipoma (1). The most frequent tumor localizations were the pelvis (n = 7) and retroperitoneal region (n = 6). Median age at surgery was 8 years (1.5-16). Macroscopically complete tumor resection was achieved in 24/25 patients. In 2/4 patients with limb tumors an amputation was planned externally. In both, a limb-salvage procedure was possible. Transient postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 2/25 patients. Four patients had tumor relapses. All but one are alive after a median follow-up of 46 months (2-155).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous interdisciplinary pediatric surgical/neurosurgical approach enables radical tumor resection with preservation of neurological function in patients suffering from solid tumors with involvement of relevant neurovascular structures. This approach should be performed by experienced surgeons in reference pediatric onco-surgical centers.

Neurofibromatosis from Head to Toe: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are autosomal dominant inherited neurocutaneous disorders or phakomatoses secondary to mutations in the NF1 and NF2 tumor suppressor genes, respectively. Although they share a common name, NF1 and NF2 are distinct disorders with a wide range of multisystem manifestations that include benign and malignant tumors. Imaging plays an essential role in diagnosis, surveillance, and management of individuals with NF1 and NF2. Therefore, it is crucial for radiologists to be familiar with the imaging features of NF1 and NF2 to allow prompt diagnosis and appropriate management. Key manifestations of NF1 include café-au-lait macules, axillary or inguinal freckling, neurofibromas or plexiform neurofibromas, optic pathway gliomas, Lisch nodules, and osseous lesions such as sphenoid dysplasia, all of which are considered diagnostic features of NF1. Other manifestations include focal areas of signal intensity in the brain, low-grade gliomas, interstitial lung disease, various abdominopelvic neoplasms, scoliosis, and vascular dysplasia. The various NF1-associated abdominopelvic neoplasms can be categorized by their cellular origin: neurogenic neoplasms, interstitial cells of Cajal neoplasms, neuroendocrine neoplasms, and embryonal neoplasms. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and intracranial tumors are the leading contributors to mortality in NF1. Classic manifestations of NF2 include schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas. However, NF2 may have shared cutaneous manifestations with NF1. Lifelong multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with either disease. The authors highlight the genetics and molecular pathogenesis, clinical and pathologic features, imaging manifestations, and multidisciplinary management and surveillance of NF1 and NF2. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Image-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a dominant hereditary disease characterized by the mutation of the NF1 gene, affecting 1/3000 individuals worldwide. Most NF1 patients are predisposed to benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs), including cutaneous neurofibromas (CNFs) and plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs). However, 5%-10% of PNFs will ultimately develop into malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), which have a poor prognosis. Early and reliable differentiation of benign and malignant tumors in NF1 patients is of great necessity. Pathological evaluation is the “gold standard” for a definite diagnosis, but the invasive nature of the biopsy procedure restricts it from applying as a screening tool during the decades-long follow-up of these patients. Non-invasive image-based diagnostic methods such as CT and MRI are often considered essential screening tools for multiple types of tumors. For NF1 patients’ lifelong regular follow-ups, these radiological methods are currently used for tumor evaluation. However, no consensus was established on screening the malignant transformation of benign PNSTs. Moreover, novel technologies like radiogenomics and PET-MRI have not been well evaluated and fully adopted for NF1 patients. This review summarizes current studies of different imaging methods for differentiating benign and malignant tumors in NF1. Meanwhile, we discussed the prospects of the usage of new tools such as radiogenomics and PET-MRI to distinguish MPNST from benign PNSTs more precisely. Summarizing these findings will help clarify the directions of future studies in this area and ultimately contribute to the radiology images-based clinical screening of MPNST in NF1 patients and finally improve the overall survival rates of these patients.

[Progress in diagnosis and treatment of neurofibromatosis in children]

Neurofibromatosis type 1（NF1） is an autosomal dominant genetic disease in which a mutation in the NF1 gene on chromosome 17q11.2 results in inactivation or down-regulation of neurofibromin. This results in a series of neurocutaneous lesions characterized by neurofibromatosis. Patients with plexiform neurofibromas（PN）, as one of the main manifestations of NF1, often experience pain, dysfunction, skeletal deformities, changes in appearance and other symptoms. In severe cases, compression of the airways and vital organs occurs, and the PN is at risk of malignancy progression. At present, its treatment is still challenging. Surgery is the primary treatment for PN, but complete resection is often difficult. In recent years, chemotherapy for PN has become a hot topic. This article reviews the research progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of PN in recent years.

MPNST without muscle weakness at presentation: an analysis of an underappreciated combination

INTRODUCTION

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) of major motor nerves typically present with muscle weakness and pain. We aim to analyze and characterize patients with MPNST at major motor nerves but without muscle weakness at initial presentation.

METHODS

A retrospective search involving MPNSTs in a major nerve evaluated and/or treated at our institution from 1994 to 2019 was performed. Patients with no muscle weakness and available MRI were analyzed. Clinical materials, MR images and PET scans were reviewed for features of malignancy. This group of patients was compared to patients who presented with MPNSTs and muscle weakness.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the no muscle weakness group. Of them, twenty-one (81%) patients had a positive family history for malignancy. Only 16 (62%) MR images were highly suspicious for malignancy. All 7 available PET-scans were highly suspicious for malignancy. Patients who presented with muscle weakness (n = 36), were more likely to have paresthesias and a history of NF-1 or radiation to the MPNST location (p-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MPNSTs of major motor nerves without muscle weakness represent an underappreciated subset of cases which has potential treatment and outcome implications. These patients presented with fewer symptoms and had fewer risk factors than patients with muscle weakness. PET-scans should be considered as an extra method of trying to anticipate the diagnosis of an MPNST.

Detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis using aneuploidy and mutation identification in plasma

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are the deadliest cancer that arises in individuals diagnosed with neurofibromatosis and account for nearly 5% of the 15,000 soft tissue sarcomas diagnosed in the United States each year. Comprised of neoplastic Schwann cells, primary risk factors for developing MPNST include existing plexiform neurofibromas (PN), prior radiotherapy treatment, and expansive germline mutations involving the entire NF1 gene and surrounding genes. PN develop in nearly 30–50% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and most often grow rapidly in the first decade of life. One of the most important aspects of clinical care for NF1 patients is monitoring PN for signs of malignant transformation to MPNST that occurs in 10–15% of patients. We perform aneuploidy analysis on ctDNA from 883 ostensibly healthy individuals and 28 patients with neurofibromas, including 7 patients with benign neurofibroma, 9 patients with PN and 12 patients with MPNST. Overall sensitivity for detecting MPNST using genome wide aneuploidy scoring was 33%, and analysis of sub-chromosomal copy number alterations (CNAs) improved sensitivity to 50% while retaining a high specificity of 97%. In addition, we performed mutation analysis on plasma cfDNA for a subset of patients and identified mutations in NF1, NF2, RB1, TP53BP2, and GOLGA2. Given the high throughput and relatively low sequencing coverage required by our assay, liquid biopsy represents a promising technology to identify incipient MPNST.

Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in detecting malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors among adult and pediatric neurofibromatosis type 1 patients

Purpose

Detecting malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) remains difficult. ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT has been shown helpful, but ideal threshold values of semi-quantitative markers remain unclear, partially because of variation among scanners. Using EU-certified scanners diagnostic accuracy of ideal and commonly used ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT thresholds were investigated and differences between adult and pediatric lesions were evaluated.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients from two hospitals with a clinical or radiological suspicion of MPNST between 2013 and 2019. Several markers were studied for ideal threshold values and differences among adults and children. A diagnostic algorithm was subsequently developed.

Results

Sixty patients were included (10 MPNSTs). Ideal threshold values were 5.8 for SUVmax (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.92), 5.0 for SUVpeak (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.97), 1.7 for TLmax (sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.86), and 2.3 for TLmean (sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.79). The standard TLmean threshold value of 2.0 yielded a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.74, while the standard SUVmax threshold value of 3.5 yielded a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.63. SUVmax and adjusted SUV for lean body mass (SUL) were lower in children, but tumor-to-liver ratios were similar in adult and pediatric lesions. Using TLmean > 2.0 or TLmean < 2.0 and SUVmax > 3.5, a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.63 can be achieved.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT offers adequate accuracy to detect MPNSTs. SUV values in pediatric MPNSTs may be lower, but tumor-to-liver ratios are not. By combining TLmean and SUVmax values, a 100% sensitivity can be achieved with acceptable specificity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03936-y.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves the Accuracy of Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

OBJECTIVE

In patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), it is important to accurately determine when plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) transforms to a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating pNF and MPNST in NF1 patients.

METHODS

Among the NF1 patients who were referred to our hospital between 1985 and 2015, 10 cases of MPNST and 19 cases of pNF were included. We evaluated features of standard magnetic resonance imaging according to the differentiation criteria of malignancy from benignancy as previously reported, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value based on the DWI and the correlation between ADC value and benignancy/malignancy. ROC analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cutoff value of ADC.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between MPNST and pNF in the size of the tumor (P = 0.009), peripheral enhancement pattern (P = 0.002), perilesional edema-like zone (P = 0.0008), and intratumoral cystic change (P = 0.02). The mean and minimum values of ADC were significantly lower in MPNST than those in pNF (P = 0.03 and P = 0.003, respectively). When we set a cutoff value of mean ADC as 1.85 × 10^-3 mm²/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 74%, respectively. The area under the curve value improved by adding the Wasa score to the mean ADC evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values determined by DWI are useful in differentiating MPNST from pNF and adding ADC evaluation to standard MRI evaluation improved the diagnostic accuracy.

Applications of PET/MRI in Abdominopelvic Oncology

With PET/MRI, the strengths of PET and MRI are combined to allow simultaneous image acquisition and near-perfect image coregistration. MRI is increasingly being used for staging and restaging of abdominopelvic oncologic lesions, including prostate, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, cervical, and rectal cancers. Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has long been considered a cornerstone of oncologic imaging, and the development of multiple targeted radiotracers has led to increased research on and use of these agents in clinical practice. Thus, simultaneously performed PET/MRI enables the acquisition of complementary imaging information, with distinct advantages over PET/CT and MR image acquisitions. The authors provide an overview of PET/MRI, including descriptions of the major differences between PET/MRI and PET/CT, as well as case examples and treatment protocols for patients with commonly encountered malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

PET/MRI Improves Management of Children with Cancer

Integrated PET/MRI has shown significant clinical value for staging and restaging of children with cancer by providing functional and anatomic tumor evaluation with a 1-stop imaging test and with up to 80% reduced radiation exposure compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. This article reviews clinical applications of 18F-FDG PET/MRI that are relevant for pediatric oncology, with particular attention to the value of PET/MRI for patient management. Early adopters from 4 different institutions share their insights about specific advantages of PET/MRI technology for the assessment of young children with cancer. We discuss how whole-body PET/MRI can be of value in the evaluation of certain anatomic regions, such as soft tissues and bone marrow, as well as specific PET/MRI interpretation hallmarks in pediatric patients. We highlight how whole-body PET/MRI can improve the clinical management of children with lymphoma, sarcoma, and neurofibromatosis, by reducing the number of radiologic examinations needed (and consequently the radiation exposure), without losing diagnostic accuracy. We examine how PET/MRI can help in differentiating malignant tumors versus infectious or inflammatory diseases. Future research directions toward the use of PET/MRI for treatment evaluation of patients undergoing immunotherapy and assessment of different theranostic agents are also briefly explored. Lessons learned from applications in children might also be extended to evaluations of adult patients.

Predicting Schwannoma Growth in a Tumor Model Using Targeted Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a common pathology encountered in neurotology clinics. Many patients are observed with a "wait and scan" approach. Previous efforts to determine radiographic indicators of future growth have been unsuccessful. Using a mouse subcutaneous tumor model, we seek to determine if fluorescent imaging with directed immunotargets could be used to predict schwannoma growth rate.

METHODS

Anti-VEGFR2 and anti-Her2/Neu monoclonal antibodies were covalently linked to a near-infrared probe (IRDye800). Immunodeficient mice underwent subcutaneous injections with a rat-derived schwann (R3) cell line. When tumor growth was evident, either Anti-VEGFR2-IRDye800, anti-Her2/Neu-IRDye800, or Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Isotype-IRDye800 (control) were injected via tail vein. The mice were serially imaged in a closed field near-IR device. Fluorescent data were analyzed for tumor signal and correlated with tumor sie and growth rate. Heterogeneity of fluorescent tumor signal was also assessed.

RESULTS

In both anti-VEGFR2 and anti-Her2/Neu groups, there were strong correlations between day 1 mean tumor fluorescence and eventual maximum tumor volume (p = 0.002, 0.001; r2 = 0.92, 0.86). There was also strong correlation with maximum tumor signal on day 1 and maximum tumor volume (p = 0.003, 0.008; r2 = 0.90, 0.91). There was no such correlation in the control group (p = 0.99, 0.75; r2 = 0.0002, 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Given the potential morbidity in VS intervention, observation is an appropriate approach for patients with slow-growing or stagnant tumors. We seek to identify immunotargets in a murine model that show promise in predicting schwannoma growth with advanced imaging techniques. Both Her2/Neu and VEGFR2 correlated strongly wth tumor size and growth rates and are promising targets that merit further investigation.

A Bayesian approach for diagnostic accuracy of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) carry a dismal prognosis and require early detection and complete resection. However, MPNSTs are prone to sampling errors and biopsies or resections are cumbersome and possibly damaging in benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor (BPNST). This study aimed to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for distinguishing MPNST from BPNST.

Methods

Studies on accuracy of MRI, FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography), and liquid biopsies were identified in PubMed and Embase from 2000 to 2019. Pooled accuracies were calculated using Bayesian bivariate meta-analyses. Individual level-patient data were analyzed for ideal maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) threshold on FDG-PET.

Results

Forty-three studies were selected for qualitative synthesis including data on 1875 patients and 2939 lesions. Thirty-five studies were included for meta-analyses. For MRI, the absence of target sign showed highest sensitivity (0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00); ill-defined margins (0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98); and perilesional edema (0.95, 95% CI: 0.83-1.00) showed highest specificity. For FDG-PET, SUV_max and tumor-to-liver ratio show similar accuracy; sensitivity 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.97 and 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97, respectively, specificity 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.87 and 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, respectively. SUV_max ≥3.5 yielded the best accuracy with a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.56-0.90).

Conclusions

Biopsies may be omitted in the presence of a target sign and the absence of ill-defined margins or perilesional edema. Because of diverse radiological characteristics of MPNST, biopsies may still commonly be required. In neurofibromatosis type 1, FDG-PET scans may further reduce biopsies. Ideal SUV_max threshold is ≥3.5.

Limitations and benefits of FDG-PET/CT in NF1 patients with nerve sheath tumors: A cross-sectional/longitudinal study

The purposes of this study were to re-confirm the usefulness of PET/CT in the differentiation of benignity/malignancy of neurogenic tumors in NF1 patients, and to analyze the natural course of plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) and clarify whether PET/CT is also useful for detecting tumors other than neurogenic tumors. PET/CT was prospectively imaged in 36 NF1 patients. There were 14 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) in 14 patients, and 54 pNFs in 30 patients. Nine patients had both MPNST and pNF. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was significantly higher in MPNST (median 7.6: range 4.1-10.4) (P < .001) compared with that of pNF (median 3.7: range 1.6-9.3). The cut-off value of 5.8 resulted in a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 88.9%. Median age was 29 y, and median maximum tumor diameter was 82 mm in 14 MPNST patients. The 5-y overall survival rate was 46.8%. Three patients with low-grade MPNST were alive without disease at the time of this report. In 9 patients in which pNF and MPNST co-existed, 2 showed a higher SUVmax of pNF than that of MPNST. Natural history analysis of pNF (n = 43) revealed that no factors significantly correlated with increased tumor size. Nine lesions other than neurogenic tumors were detected by PET/CT including 5 thyroid lesions and 3 malignant neoplasms. This study revealed the usefulness and limitation of PET/CT for NF1 patients. In the future, it will be necessary to study how to detect over time the malignant transformation of pNF to MPNST, via an intermediate tumor.

Spinal manifestations of Neurofibromatosis type 1

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients may present a wide spectrum of spinal pathologies. Osseous changes may lead to severe deformities with significant implications on growth and quality of life. Neurogenic tumors and soft tissue abnormalities may cause neuropathic pain and dysfunction ranging from minor paresthesias to profound motor and sensory deficits. Advanced imaging such as whole-body MRI, and volumetric tumor burden assessment have an evolving role in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with high spinal tumor load. Novel biological agents that target the hyperactivated ras pathway are currently under investigation and are reshaping current and future treatment paradigms. Surgical interventions for benign and malignant tumors, as well as deformity correction remain pivotal in treatment frameworks and require careful assessment by a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

PURPOSE

In this manuscript we review the various spinal manifestations of NF1 patients, indication for surgical intervention and oncological treatments.

Diagnosis and management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Current practice and future perspectives

One of the most common malignancies affecting adults with the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) cancer predisposition syndrome is the malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), a highly aggressive sarcoma that typically develops from benign plexiform neurofibromas. Approximately 8-13% of individuals with NF1 will develop MPNST during young adulthood. There are few therapeutic options, and the vast majority of people with these cancers will die within 5 years of diagnosis. Despite efforts to understand the pathogenesis of these aggressive tumors, the overall prognosis remains dismal. This manuscript will review the current understanding of the cellular and molecular progression of MPNST, diagnostic workup of patients with these tumors, current treatment paradigms, and investigational treatment options. Additionally, we highlight novel areas of preclinical research, which may lead to future clinical trials. In summary, MPNST remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, and future work is needed to develop novel and rational combinational therapy for these tumors.

Abdominal neoplastic manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant hereditary tumor syndrome, with a wide clinicopathologic spectrum. It is defined by characteristic central nervous system, cutaneous and osseous manifestations, and by mutations in the NF1 gene, which is involved in proliferation via p21, RAS, and MAP kinase pathways. Up to 25% of NF1 patients develop intra-abdominal neoplastic manifestations including neurogenic (commonly plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors), interstitial cells of Cajal (hyperplasia, gastrointestinal stromal tumors), neuroendocrine, and embryonal tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma). Nonspecific symptoms, multifocal disease, or coexistence of 2 or more tumor types make patients challenging to diagnose and manage. Screening for intra-abdominal tumors in NF1 patients remains controversial, and currently no guidelines are established. Management decisions are complex and often informed by single-center experiences or case studies in the literature, though the field is rapidly evolving. Thus, NF1 patients should be followed in specialist centers familiar with their wide spectrum of pathology and with multidisciplinary care including specialized pathology and radiology. This review will (1) provide a contemporaneous synthesis of the literature and our multi-institutional clinical experiences with intra-abdominal neoplasms in NF1 patients, (2) present a classification framework for this heterogeneous group of disorders, and (3) outline approaches to screening, surveillance, diagnosis, and management.

Treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in pediatric NF1 disease

BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare yet highly aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a 10% lifetime risk for development of MPNST. Prognosis remains poor and survival seems worse for NF1 patients.

METHODS

This narrative review highlights current practices and pitfalls in the management of MPNST in pediatric NF1 patients.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnostics can be challenging, but PET scans have shown to be useful tools. More recently, functional MRI holds promise as well. Surgery remains the mainstay treatment for these patients, but careful planning is needed to minimize postoperative morbidity. Functional reconstructions can play a role in improving functional status. Radiotherapy can be administered to enhance local control in selected cases, but care should be taken to minimize radiation effects as well as reduce the risk of secondary malignancies. The exact role of chemotherapy has yet to be determined. Reports on the efficacy of chemotherapy vary as some report lower effects in NF1 populations. Promisingly, survival seems to ameliorate in the last few decades and response rates of chemotherapy may increase in NF1 populations when administering it as part of standard of care. However, in metastasized disease, response rates remain poor. New systemic therapies are therefore desperately warranted and multiple trials are currently investigating the role of drugs. Targeted drugs are nevertheless not yet included in first line treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both research and clinical efforts benefit from multidisciplinary approaches with international collaborations in this rare malignancy.

How Effective Are Noninvasive Tests for Diagnosing Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1? Diagnosing MPNST in NF1 Patients

Background

Distinguishing between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) patients prior to excision can be challenging. How can MPNST be most accurately diagnosed using clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (tumor size, depth, and necrosis), positron emission tomography (PET) measures (SUV_peak, SUV_max, SUV_{max tumor}/SUV_{mean liver}, and qualitative scale), and combinations of the above? Methods. All NF1 patients who underwent PET imaging at our institution (January 1, 2007–December 31, 2016) were included. Medical records were reviewed for clinical findings; MR images and PET images were interpreted by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal and nuclear medicine radiologists, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for each PET measurement; the area under the curve (AUC) and thresholds for diagnosing malignancy were calculated. Logistic regression determined significant predictors of malignancy.

Results

Our population of 41 patients contained 34 benign and 36 malignant tumors. Clinical findings did not reliably predict MPNST. Tumor depth below fascia was highly sensitive; larger tumors were more likely to be malignant but without a useful cutoff for diagnosis. Necrosis on MRI was highly accurate and was the only significant variable in the regression model. PET measures were highly accurate, with AUCs comparable and cutoff points consistent with prior studies. A diagnostic algorithm was created using MRI and PET findings.

Conclusions

MRI and PET were more effective at diagnosing MPNST than clinical features. We created an algorithm for preoperative evaluation of peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1 patients, for which additional validation will be indicated.