1
|
Nonnekens J, Cornelissen B, Terry SYA. Second Symposium of the European Working Group on the Radiobiology of Molecular Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1788-1790. [PMID: 37442600 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular radionuclide therapy is a relatively novel anticancer treatment option using radiolabeled, tumor-specific vectors. On binding of these vectors to cancer cells, radioactive decay induces DNA damage and other effects, leading to cancer cell death. Treatments, such as with [177Lu]Lu-octreotate for neuroendocrine tumors and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA for prostate cancer, are now being implemented into routine clinical practice around the world. Nonetheless, research into the underlying radiobiologic effects of these treatments is essential to further improve them or formulate new ones. The purpose of the European Working Group on the Radiobiology of Molecular Radiotherapy is to promote knowledge, investment, and networking in this area. This report summarizes recent research and insights presented at the second International Workshop on Radiobiology of Molecular Radiotherapy, held in London, U.K., on March 13 and 14, 2023. The symposium was organized by members of the Cancer Research U.K. RadNet City of London and the European Working Group on the Radiobiology of Molecular Radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Cornelissen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernandes A, Oliveira A, Carvalho AL, Soares R, Barata P. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients Treated with Radioiodine. Nutrients 2023; 15:2680. [PMID: 37375584 DOI: 10.3390/nu15122680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, one of the most important bacteria of the human gut microbiota, produces butyrate (a short-chain fatty acid). Short-chain fatty acids are known to influence thyroid physiology and thyroid cancer's response to treatment. We aimed to analyze the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii on the gut microbiota of differentiated thyroid cancer patients compared to controls and its variation after radioiodine therapy (RAIT). METHODS Fecal samples were collected from 37 patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid cancer before and after radioiodine therapy and from 10 volunteers. The abundance of F. prausnitzii was determined using shotgun metagenomics. RESULTS Our study found that the relative abundance of F. prausnitzii is significantly reduced in thyroid cancer patients compared to volunteers. We also found that there was a mixed response to RAIT, with an increase in the relative and absolute abundances of this bacterium in most patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that thyroid cancer patients present a dysbiotic gut microbiota, with a reduction in F. prausnitzii's relative abundance. In our study, radioiodine did not negatively affect F. prausnitzii, quite the opposite, suggesting that this bacterium might play a role in resolving radiation aggression issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Fernandes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Oliveira
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Luísa Carvalho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Soares
- Department of Biomedicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Barata
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pouget JP, Konijnenberg M, Eberlein U, Glatting G, Gabina PM, Herrmann K, Holm S, Strigari L, van Leeuwen FWB, Lassmann M. An EANM position paper on advancing radiobiology for shaping the future of nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:242-246. [PMID: 36066665 PMCID: PMC9816280 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05934-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Pablo Minguez Gabina
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gurutzeta-Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Søren Holm
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effect of Radium-223 on the Gut Microbiota of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Pilot Case Series Study. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2022; 44:4950-4959. [PMID: 36286051 PMCID: PMC9600596 DOI: 10.3390/cimb44100336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Radium-223 (Ra-223) is a targeted nuclear medicine therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases. Its major route of elimination is the intestine. There is overwhelming evidence that the gut microbiota is altered by ionizing radiation (IR) from radiotherapy treatments. Nevertheless, it is known that extrapolation of outcomes from radiotherapy to nuclear medicine is not straightforward. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effect of Ra-223 on selected important bacteria from the gut microbiota. Stool samples from three prostate cancer patients and two healthy individuals were obtained, processed, and analysed. We specifically measured the relative change of the abundance of important bacteria, determined by the 2−ΔΔC method. We found that Ra-223 influenced the gut microbiota composition. The most relevant changes were increases of Proteobacteria and Atopobacter; and decreases of Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium coccoides, and Bacteroides fragilis. Additionally, our experiment confirms that the composition of gut microbiota from prostate cancer patients is altered. No significant correlation was found between each subject’s gut microbiome profile and their clinical indices. Despite its limited sample, the results of this pilot study suggest that ionizing radiation from Ra-223 alters the gut microbiota composition and that the gut microbiota of prostate cancer patients has an increase of the bacteria with known prejudicial effects and a decrease of the ones with favorable effects.
Collapse
|
5
|
Delbart W, Karabet J, Marin G, Penninckx S, Derrien J, Ghanem GE, Flamen P, Wimana Z. Understanding the Radiobiological Mechanisms Induced by 177Lu-DOTATATE in Comparison to External Beam Radiation Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232012369. [PMID: 36293222 PMCID: PMC9604190 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Radionuclide Therapy (RNT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE targeting somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has been successfully used in routine clinical practice, mainly leading to stable disease. Radiobiology holds promise for RNT improvement but is often extrapolated from external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) studies despite differences in these two radiation-based treatment modalities. In a panel of six human cancer cell lines expressing SSTRs, common radiobiological endpoints (i.e., cell survival, cell cycle, cell death, oxidative stress and DNA damage) were evaluated over time in 177Lu-DOTATATE- and EBRT-treated cells, as well as the radiosensitizing potential of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition (PARPi). Our study showed that common radiobiological mechanisms were induced by both 177Lu-DOTATATE and EBRT, but to a different extent and/or with variable kinetics, including in the DNA damage response. A higher radiosensitizing potential of PARPi was observed for EBRT compared to 177Lu-DOTATATE. Our data reinforce the need for dedicated RNT radiobiology studies, in order to derive its maximum therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Delbart
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2-541-30-05
| | - Jirair Karabet
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gwennaëlle Marin
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sébastien Penninckx
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jonathan Derrien
- Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et Des Radiations, Institut Supérieur Industriel de Bruxelles (ISIB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- NEMP Applied Research Lab, Institut de Recherche de l’Institut Supérieur Industriel de Bruxelles (IRISIB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ghanem E. Ghanem
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Zéna Wimana
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ionizing Radiation from Radiopharmaceuticals and the Human Gut Microbiota: An Ex Vivo Approach. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231810809. [PMID: 36142722 PMCID: PMC9506506 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of three widely used radiopharmaceuticals with intestinal excretion on selected relevant bacteria that are part of the human gut microbiota, using an ex vivo approach. Fecal samples obtained from healthy volunteers were analyzed. Each sample was divided into four smaller aliquots. One served as the non-irradiated control. The other three were homogenized with three radiopharmaceutical solutions ([131I]NaI, [99mTc]NaTcO4, and [223Ra]RaCl2). Relative quantification of each taxa was determined by the 2−ΔΔC method, using the ribosomal gene 16S as an internal control (primers 534/385). Twelve fecal samples were analysed: three controls and nine irradiated. Our experiment showed fold changes in all analyzed taxa with all radiopharmaceuticals, but results were more significant with I-131, ranging from 1.87–83.58; whereas no relevant differences were found with Tc-99m and Ra-223, ranging from 0.98–1.58 and 0.83–1.97, respectively. This study corroborates limited existing research on how ionizing radiation changes the gut microbiota composition, providing novel data regarding the ex vivo effect of radiopharmaceuticals. Our findings justify the need for future larger scale projects.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nonnekens J, Pouget JP, Cornelissen B, Terry SYA. Status of radiobiology in molecular radionuclide therapy - Hope for the future. Nucl Med Biol 2022; 110-111:45-46. [PMID: 35561638 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, France
| | - Bart Cornelissen
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Samantha Y A Terry
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Neill E, Cornelissen B. Know thy tumour: Biomarkers to improve treatment of molecular radionuclide therapy. Nucl Med Biol 2022; 108-109:44-53. [PMID: 35276447 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) is an effective treatment for both localised and disseminated tumours. Biomarkers can be used to identify potential subtypes of tumours that are known to respond better to standard MRT protocols. These enrolment-based biomarkers can further be used to develop dose-response relationships using image-based dosimetry within these defined subtypes. However, the biological identity of the cancers treated with MRT are commonly not well-defined, particularly for neuroendocrine neoplasms. The biological heterogeneity of such cancers has hindered the establishment of dose-responses and minimum tumour dose thresholds. Biomarkers could also be used to determine normal tissue MRT dose limits and permit greater injected doses of MRT in patients. An alternative approach is to understand the repair capacity limits of tumours using radiobiology-based biomarkers within and outside patient cohorts currently treated with MRT. It is hoped that by knowing more about tumours and how they respond to MRT, biomarkers can provide needed dimensionality to image-based biodosimetry to improve MRT with optimized protocols and personalised therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward O'Neill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Bart Cornelissen
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Asadian S, Piryaei A, Gheibi N, Aziz Kalantari B, Reza Davarpanah M, Azad M, Kapustina V, Alikhani M, Moghbeli Nejad S, Keshavarz Alikhani H, Mohamadi M, Shpichka A, Timashev P, Hassan M, Vosough M. Rhenium Perrhenate ( 188ReO 4) Induced Apoptosis and Reduced Cancerous Phenotype in Liver Cancer Cells. Cells 2022; 11:305. [PMID: 35053421 PMCID: PMC8774126 DOI: 10.3390/cells11020305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after conventional treatments is a crucial challenge. Despite the promising progress in advanced targeted therapies, HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Radionuclide therapy can potentially be a practical targeted approach to address this concern. Rhenium-188 (188Re) is a β-emitting radionuclide used in the clinic to induce apoptosis and inhibit cell proliferation. Although adherent cell cultures are efficient and reliable, appropriate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) contact is still lacking. Thus, we herein aimed to assess 188Re as a potential therapeutic component for HCC in 2D and 3D models. The death rate in treated Huh7 and HepG2 lines was significantly higher than in untreated control groups using viability assay. After treatment with 188ReO4, Annexin/PI data indicated considerable apoptosis induction in HepG2 cells after 48 h but not Huh7 cells. Quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting data also showed increased apoptosis in response to 188ReO4 treatment. In Huh7 cells, exposure to an effective dose of 188ReO4 led to cell cycle arrest in the G2 phase. Moreover, colony formation assay confirmed post-exposure growth suppression in Huh7 and HepG2 cells. Then, the immunostaining displayed proliferation inhibition in the 188ReO4-treated cells on 3D scaffolds of liver ECM. The PI3-AKT signaling pathway was activated in 3D culture but not in 2D culture. In nude mice, Huh7 cells treated with an effective dose of 188ReO4 lost their tumor formation ability compared to the control group. These findings suggest that 188ReO4 can be a potential new therapeutic agent against HCC through induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and inhibition of tumor formation. This approach can be effectively combined with antibodies and peptides for more selective and personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samieh Asadian
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 34199153, Iran; (S.A.); (M.A.); (S.M.N.)
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 16635148, Iran; (M.A.); (H.K.A.)
| | - Abbas Piryaei
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 16123798, Iran;
- Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 16123798, Iran
| | - Nematollah Gheibi
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 34199153, Iran; (S.A.); (M.A.); (S.M.N.)
| | - Bagher Aziz Kalantari
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj 16255879, Iran;
| | | | - Mehdi Azad
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 34199153, Iran; (S.A.); (M.A.); (S.M.N.)
| | - Valentina Kapustina
- Department of Internal Medicine N1, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Mehdi Alikhani
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 16635148, Iran; (M.A.); (H.K.A.)
| | - Sahar Moghbeli Nejad
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 34199153, Iran; (S.A.); (M.A.); (S.M.N.)
| | - Hani Keshavarz Alikhani
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 16635148, Iran; (M.A.); (H.K.A.)
| | - Morteza Mohamadi
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran 17456987, Iran;
| | - Anastasia Shpichka
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Chemistry Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Peter Timashev
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Chemistry Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Moustapha Hassan
- Experimental Cancer Medicine, Institution for Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 141-83 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Clinical Research Center, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141-83 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Massoud Vosough
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 16635148, Iran; (M.A.); (H.K.A.)
- Experimental Cancer Medicine, Institution for Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 141-83 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Clinical Research Center, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141-83 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abbott EM, Falzone N, Lenzo N, Vallis KA. Combining External Beam Radiation and Radionuclide Therapies: Rationale, Radiobiology, Results and Roadblocks. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:735-743. [PMID: 34544640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of effective radionuclide therapeutics, such as radium-223 dichloride, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA ligands, over the last 10 years is driving a rapid expansion in molecular radiotherapy (MRT) research. Clinical trials that are underway will help to define optimal dosing protocols and identify groups of patients who are likely to benefit from this form of treatment. Clinical investigations are also being conducted to combine new MRT agents with other anticancer drugs, with particular emphasis on DNA repair inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. In this review, the case is presented for combining MRT with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The technical and dosimetric challenges of combining two radiotherapeutic modalities have impeded progress in the past. However, the need for research into the specific radiobiological effects of radionuclide therapy, which has lagged behind that for EBRT, has been recognised. This, together with innovations in imaging technology, MRT dosimetry tools and EBRT hardware, will facilitate the future use of this important combination of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Abbott
- MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - N Falzone
- GenesisCare, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - N Lenzo
- GenesisCare Theranostics, St John of God Murdoch Cancer Centre, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, Notre Dame University Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - K A Vallis
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Verburg FA, Konijnenberg MW, Nonnekens J. The limits of the "holy gray" in radioembolization and beyond : Beyond the "holy Gray". Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4118-4119. [PMID: 34498110 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05560-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Verburg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark W Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Verburg FA, Nonnekens J, Konijnenberg MW, de Jong M. To go where no one has gone before: the necessity of radiobiology studies for exploration beyond the limits of the "Holy Gray" in radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2680-2682. [PMID: 33392716 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05147-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A Verburg
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Julie Nonnekens
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Departments of Molecular Genetics, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mark W Konijnenberg
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marion de Jong
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Costa IM, Cheng J, Osytek KM, Imberti C, Terry SYA. Methods and techniques for in vitro subcellular localization of radiopharmaceuticals and radionuclides. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 98-99:18-29. [PMID: 33964707 PMCID: PMC7610823 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
In oncology, the holy grail of radiotherapy is specific radiation dose deposition in tumours with minimal healthy tissue toxicity. If used appropriately, injectable, systemic radionuclide therapies could meet these criteria, even for treatment of micrometastases and single circulating tumour cells. The clinical use of α and β- particle-emitting molecular radionuclide therapies is rising, however clinical translation of Auger electron-emitting radionuclides is hampered by uncertainty around their exact subcellular localisation, which in turn affects the accuracy of dosimetry. This review aims to discuss and compare the advantages and disadvantages of various subcellular localisation methods available to localise radiopharmaceuticals and radionuclides for in vitro investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines M Costa
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Jordan Cheng
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Katarzyna M Osytek
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Cinzia Imberti
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Samantha Y A Terry
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gold nanoparticles meet medical radionuclides. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 100-101:61-90. [PMID: 34237502 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Thanks to their unique optical and physicochemical properties, gold nanoparticles have gained increased interest as radiosensitizing, photothermal therapy and optical imaging agents to enhance the effectiveness of cancer detection and therapy. Furthermore, their ability to carry multiple medically relevant radionuclides broadens their use to nuclear medicine SPECT and PET imaging as well as targeted radionuclide therapy. In this review, we discuss the radiolabeling process of gold nanoparticles and their use in (multimodal) nuclear medicine imaging to better understand their specific distribution, uptake and retention in different in vivo cancer models. In addition, radiolabeled gold nanoparticles enable image-guided therapy is reviewed as well as the enhancement of targeted radionuclide therapy and nanobrachytherapy through an increased dose deposition and radiosensitization, as demonstrated by multiple Monte Carlo studies and experimental in vitro and in vivo studies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Suman SK, Subramanian S, Mukherjee A. Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 98-99:40-58. [PMID: 34029984 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shishu Kant Suman
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Suresh Subramanian
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Archana Mukherjee
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aerts A, Eberlein U, Holm S, Hustinx R, Konijnenberg M, Strigari L, van Leeuwen FWB, Glatting G, Lassmann M. EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3365-3377. [PMID: 33912987 PMCID: PMC8440244 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Aerts
- Radiobiology Unit, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Sören Holm
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, GIGA-CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerhard Glatting
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Delbart W, Ghanem GE, Karfis I, Flamen P, Wimana Z. Investigating intrinsic radiosensitivity biomarkers to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in a panel of cancer cell lines. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 96-97:68-79. [PMID: 33839677 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is an effective systemic targeted radionuclide therapy for somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive metastatic or inoperable neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, for a given injected activity, tumour responses are variable. Our aim was to investigate whether SSTR expression/functionality and known characteristics of intrinsic radiosensitivity, namely proliferation rate, glucose metabolism, cell cycle phase, DNA repair and antioxidant defences were predictors of sensitivity to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in SSTR expressing human cancer cell lines. METHODS In six human cancer cell lines and under basal condition, SSTR expression was assessed by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Its functionality was evaluated by binding/uptake assays with [68Ga]Ga- and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The radiosensitivity parameters were evaluated as follows: proliferation rate (cell counting), glucose metabolism ([18F]FDG uptake), antioxidant defences (qRT-PCR, colorimetric assay, flow cytometry), DNA repair (qRT-PCR) and cell cycle (flow cytometry). Effect of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE on cell viability was assessed 3, 7 and 10 days after 4 h incubation with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE using crystal violet. RESULTS Based on cell survival at day 10, cell lines were classified into two groups of sensitivity to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. One group with <20% of survival decrease (-14 to -1%) and one group with >20% of survival decrease (-22 to -33%) compared to the untreated control cell lines. The latter had significantly lower total antioxidant capacity, glutathione (GSH) levels and glucose metabolism (p < 0.05) compared to the first group. SSTR (p = 0.64), proliferation rate (p = 0.74), cell cycle phase (p = 0.55), DNA repair (p > 0.22), combined catalase and GSH peroxidase expression (p = 0.42) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (p = 0.41) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION Antioxidant defences may be major determinants in [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE radiosensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Delbart
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ghanem E Ghanem
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ioannis Karfis
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Zéna Wimana
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Feijtel D, Doeswijk GN, Verkaik NS, Haeck JC, Chicco D, Angotti C, Konijnenberg MW, de Jong M, Nonnekens J. Inter and intra-tumor somatostatin receptor 2 heterogeneity influences peptide receptor radionuclide therapy response. Theranostics 2021; 11:491-505. [PMID: 33391488 PMCID: PMC7738856 DOI: 10.7150/thno.51215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Here, the somatostatin analogue octreotate radiolabeled with lutetium-177 is targeted to NET cells by binding to the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2). During radioactive decay, DNA damage is induced, leading to NET cell death. Although the therapy proves to be effective, mortality rates remain high. To appropriately select more optimal treatment strategies, it is essential to first better understand the radiobiological responses of tumor cells to PRRT. Methods: We analyzed PRRT induced radiobiological responses in SST2 expressing cells and xenografted mice using SPECT/MRI scanning and histological and molecular analyses. We measured [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE uptake and performed analyses to visualize induction of DNA damage, cell death and other cellular characteristics. Results: The highest accumulation of radioactivity was measured in the tumor and kidneys. PRRT induced DNA damage signaling and repair in a time-dependent manner. We observed intra-tumor heterogeneity of DNA damage and apoptosis, which was not attributed to proliferation or bioavailability. We found a strong correlation between high DNA damage levels and high SST2 expression. PRRT elicited a different therapeutic response between models with different SST2 expression levels. Heterogeneous SST2 expression levels were also confirmed in patient NETs. Conclusion: Heterogeneous SST2 expression levels within NETs cause differentially induced DNA damage levels, influence recurrent tumor phenotypes and impact the therapeutic response in different models and potentially in patients. Our results contribute to a better understanding of PRRT effects, which might impact future therapeutic outcome of NET patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chan TG, O'Neill E, Habjan C, Cornelissen B. Combination Strategies to Improve Targeted Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:1544-1552. [PMID: 33037092 PMCID: PMC8679619 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.248062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment. In contrast to conventional radiotherapy, TRT delivers ionizing radiation to tumors in a targeted manner, reducing the dose that healthy tissues are exposed to. Existing TRT strategies include the use of 177Lu-DOTATATE, 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine, Bexxar, and Zevalin, clinically approved agents for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, neuroblastoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively. Although promising results have been obtained with these agents, clinical evidence acquired to date suggests that only a small percentage of patients achieves complete response. Consequently, there have been attempts to improve TRT outcomes through combinations with other therapeutic agents; such strategies include administering concurrent TRT and chemotherapy, and the use of TRT with known or putative radiosensitizers such as poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase and mammalian-target-of-rapamycin inhibitors. In addition to potentially achieving greater therapeutic effects than the respective monotherapies, these strategies may lead to lower dosages or numbers of cycles required and, in turn, reduce unwanted toxicities. As of now, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the benefits of TRT-based combination therapies, sometimes despite limited preclinical evidence being available in the public domain to support their use. Although some clinical trials have yielded promising results, others have shown no clear survival benefit from particular combination treatments. Here, we present a comprehensive review of combination strategies with TRT reported in the literature to date and evaluate their therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany G Chan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Edward O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Habjan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bart Cornelissen
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
O'Neill E, Kersemans V, Allen PD, Terry SYA, Torres JB, Mosley M, Smart S, Lee BQ, Falzone N, Vallis KA, Konijnenberg MW, de Jong M, Nonnekens J, Cornelissen B. Imaging DNA Damage Repair In Vivo After 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:743-750. [PMID: 31757844 PMCID: PMC7198382 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular radiotherapy using 177Lu-DOTATATE is a most effective treatment for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumors. Despite its frequent and successful use in the clinic, little or no radiobiologic considerations are made at the time of treatment planning or delivery. On positive uptake on octreotide-based PET/SPECT imaging, treatment is usually administered as a standard dose and number of cycles without adjustment for peptide uptake, dosimetry, or radiobiologic and DNA damage effects in the tumor. Here, we visualized and quantified the extent of DNA damage response after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy using SPECT imaging with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT. This work was a proof-of-principle study of this in vivo noninvasive biodosimeter with β-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods: Six cell lines were exposed to external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or 177Lu-DOTATATE, after which the number of γH2AX foci and the clonogenic survival were measured. Mice bearing CA20948 somatostatin receptor-positive tumor xenografts were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE or sham-treated and coinjected with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT, 111In-IgG-TAT control, or vehicle. Results: Clonogenic survival after external-beam radiotherapy was cell-line-specific, indicating varying levels of intrinsic radiosensitivity. Regarding in vitro cell lines treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE, clonogenic survival decreased and γH2AX foci increased for cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Ex vivo measurements revealed a partial correlation between 177Lu-DOTATATE uptake and γH2AX focus induction between different regions of CA20948 xenograft tumors, suggesting that different parts of the tumor may react differentially to 177Lu-DOTATATE irradiation. Conclusion:111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT allows monitoring of DNA damage after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy and reveals heterogeneous damage responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward O'Neill
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Veerle Kersemans
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - P Danny Allen
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Y A Terry
- Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Baguña Torres
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Mosley
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Smart
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Boon Quan Lee
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Falzone
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine A Vallis
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark W Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marion de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
- Oncode Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Cornelissen
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|