Characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after peptide receptor radionuclide/chemoradionuclide therapy (PRRT/PRCRT) for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia: a single-institution series

Combination Strategies and Targeted Radionuclide Therapies

Combination models utilising treatments from two or more therapeutic classes are well established in cancer care. In the new era of theranostic (theragnostic) medicine there is an ongoing need to identify and refine novel combination strategies to optimise multidisciplinary care for conditions commonly encountered in nuclear medicine such as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), prostate cancer (PCa), and thyroid cancer, along with seeking advancements in molecular imaging and therapy techniques for other tumour streams. This concise review explores the background of theranostic monotherapy, established approaches to combination strategies in theranostics, and emerging targeted radionuclide therapies in use or under active investigation, with a focus on Australian-led studies.

177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT Safety and Organ-at-Risk Dosimetry in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Data From the Prospective Phase 2 LUMEN Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the association among toxicity, dosimetry of organs-at-risk, and disease progression in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with GEP-NETs underwent 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in a single-arm, prospective, phase 2 study, where patients were followed up with blood tests, isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), and imaging examinations (CT/MRI and PET) every 6 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) graded per CTCAEv4.03 and occurring during treatment were collected and followed up until resolution. Dosimetry, including biologically effective doses (BEDs) to kidneys, BED to bone marrow, and absorbed dose (AD) to spleen, was performed after each PRRT cycle. Statistical analyses explored associations among dosimetry, toxicity, and patient progression free-survival.

RESULTS

The most common AEs were anemia and lymphopenia (65%), followed by thrombocytopenia and fatigue (each 51%), alopecia (46%), and nausea (41%). The most common grade ≥3 AE was lymphopenia (43%). There was no grade ≥3 nephrotoxicity. The median iGFR % decrease was 11% (P < 0.001), at a median follow-up of 23 months. iGFR %decrease and renal BED did not correlate (Spearman ρ = -0.09). Similarly, no significant association was found between bone marrow BED or spleen AD and the grades of hematological toxicities. We observed no association between progression free-survival and either the decline of renal function or the occurrence of hematological toxicities during PRRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in patients with GEP-NETs irrespective of the dosimetry of organs at risk. Kidney, bone marrow, and spleen dosimetry measures were not associated with renal or hematological toxicity.

Current Management of Neuroendocrine Tumour Liver Metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to illustrate the current state of investigations and management of liver metastases in patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rising in incidence globally and have become the second most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in UK and USA. Frequently, patients have metastatic disease at time of presentation. The liver is the most common site of metastases for gastro-enteropancreatic NETs. Characterisation of liver metastases with imaging is important to ensure disease is not under-staged.

RECENT FINDINGS

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are now becoming standard of care for imaging liver metastases. There is an increasing armamentarium of therapies available for management of NETs and loco-regional therapy for liver metastases. The data supporting surgical and loco-regional therapy is reviewed with focus on role of liver transplantation. It is important to use appropriate imaging and classification of NET liver metastases. It is key that decisions regarding approach to treatment is undertaken in a multidisciplinary team and that individualised approaches are considered for management of patients with metastatic NETs.

Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated With Lutetium-177 and the Risk of Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

Thrombocytopenia is a relatively common dose-limiting toxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with NET. Although uncommon, some patients develop persistent cytopenia and eventually therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), which has a dismal prognosis. As the indications for PRRT are expanding, it is important to investigate factors that may predict cytopenias during/after PRRT. We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and cytopenia in patients with NET undergoing PRRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic NET with plan to receive four cycles of lutetium-177 were enrolled. CH was evaluated before PRRT using a panel of 220 genes with a targeted depth of ≥1,000×. Patients were followed during PRRT and every 3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients enrolled, the median age was 68 years and 51.4% were male. Previous treatment exposures included alkylating agents in 30%, platinum agents in 8%, and external radiation in 13%. CH was detected in 35.1% using a variant allele frequency (VAF) cutoff of ≥2% and 45.9% with a VAF of ≥1%. The most common mutations were in age-related genes (DNMT3A, TET2). CH was not associated with anemia or neutropenia; however, it was associated with lower platelet count at baseline and more time spent in a thrombocytopenic state during/after PRRT. Five patients had bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) because of sustained hematologic dysfunction post-PRRT, and of those, diagnoses included clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) in three and idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) in two.

CONCLUSION

CH is present in 35.1% of patients with NET and is associated with thrombocytopenia risk during PRRT. Future studies with long-term follow-up will delineate whether CH might be a predictor for higher risk of t-MN after PRRT.

Theranostics in Neuroendocrine Tumors

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors that develop from cells of the neuroendocrine system and can originate in multiple organs and tissues such as the bowels, pancreas, adrenal glands, ganglia, thyroid, and lungs. This review will focus on gastroenteropancreatic NETs (more commonly called NETs) characterized by frequent somatostatin receptor (SSTR) overexpression and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PPGLs), which typically overexpress norepinephrine transporter. Advancements in SSTR-targeted imaging and treatment have revolutionized the management of patients with NETs. This comprehensive review delves into the current practice, discussing the use of the various Food and Drug Administration-approved SSTR-agonist positron emission tomography tracers and the predictive imaging biomarkers, and elaborating on 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy including the evolving areas of posttherapy imaging practices and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy retreatment. SSTR-targeted imaging and therapy can also be used in patients with PPGL; however, this patient population has demonstrated the best outcomes from norepinephrine transporter-targeted therapy with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Metaiodobenzylguanidine theranostics for PPGL will be discussed, noting that in 2024 it became commercially unavailable in the United States. Therefore, the use and reported success of SSTR theranostics for PPGL will also be explored.

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

We present the results of an open-label, phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in 40 patients with previously treated, progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), in which dosimetry was used to guide maximum administered activity.

METHODS

This study was conducted in two parts. Part A consisted of 15 patients who completed three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan at a fixed administered activity and peptide amount per cycle (4.5 GBq/300 µg). Part B, which included 25 patients who received one to five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, evaluated different administered activities (4.5 or 6.0 GBq/cycle) and peptide amounts (300, 700, or 1300 μg/cycle), limited to a cumulative absorbed radiation dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys and 1.5 Gy to the bone marrow.

RESULTS

Median cumulative administered activity of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan was 13.0 GBq over three cycles (13.1 GBq in part A and 12.9 GBq in part B). Overall, 17 (42.5%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment‑related adverse events; the most common were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Two patients developed myeloid neoplasms considered treatment related by the investigator. Disease control rate for part A and part B was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-99.4), and overall response rate was 21.1% (95% CI: 9.6-37.3).

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three cycles, has an acceptable safety profile with a promising clinical response in patients with progressive, SSTR-positive NETs. A 5-year long-term follow-up study is ongoing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

The relationship between tumour dosimetry, response, and overall survival in patients with unresectable Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) treated with 177Lu DOTATATE (LuTate)

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) delivers targeted radiation to Somatostatin Receptor (SSR) expressing Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN). We sought to assess the predictive and prognostic implications of tumour dosimetry with respect to response by 68 Ga DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT molecular imaging tumour volume of SSR (MITVSSR) change and RECIST 1.1, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NEN who received LuTate followed by quantitative SPECT/CT (Q-SPECT/CT) the next day (Jul 2010 to Jan 2019) were retrospectively reviewed. Single time-point (STP) lesional dosimetry was performed for each cycle using population-based pharmacokinetic modelling. MITVSSR and RECIST 1.1 were measured at 3-months post PRRT.

RESULTS

Median of 4 PRRT cycles were administered to 90 patients (range 2-5 cycles; mean 27.4 GBq cumulative activity; mean 7.6 GBq per cycle). 68% received at least one cycle with radiosensitising chemotherapy (RSC). RECIST 1.1 partial response was 24%, with 70% stable and 7% progressive disease. Cycle 1 radiation dose in measurable lesions was associated with local response (odds ratio 1.5 per 50 Gy [95% CI: 1.1-2.0], p = 0.002) when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC. Median change in MITVSSR was -63% (interquartile range -84 to -29), with no correlation with radiation dose to the most avid lesion on univariable or multivariant analyses (5.6 per 10 Gy [95% CI: -1.6, 12.8], p = 0.133). OS at 5-years was 68% (95% CI: 56-78%). Neither baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.1 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.2], p = 0.128) nor change in baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.0 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.1], p = 0.223) were associated with OS when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC but RSC was (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose to tumour during PRRT was predictive of radiologic response but not survival. Survival outcomes may relate to other biological factors. There was no evidence that MITVSSR change was associated with OS, but a larger study is needed.

Safety and Therapeutic Optimization of Lutetium-177 Based Radiopharmaceuticals

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) based radiopharmaceuticals has emerged as a therapeutic area in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology, allowing for personalized medicine. Since the first market authorization in 2018 of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) targeting somatostatin receptor type 2 in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intensive research has led to transfer innovative ¹⁷⁷Lu containing pharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recently, a second market authorization in the field was obtained for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu radiopharmaceuticals are now quite well-reported and data on the safety and management of patients are needed. This review will focus on several clinically tested and reported tailored approaches to enhance the risk-benefit trade-off of radioligand therapy. The aim is to help clinicians and nuclear medicine staff set up safe and optimized procedures using the approved ¹⁷⁷Lu based radiopharmaceuticals.

Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time?

Since its approval in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Lutetium-177-DOTATATE, the only approved agent, is indicated for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. Although patient selection appears straightforward with somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography, there is considerable complexity when deciding which patients to treat and when to start PRRT. Herein, we review the many factors that affect patient selection, focusing on the optimal patients to treat. Although significant effort has been expended to determine which patients benefit the most from PRRT, a validated predictive biomarker remains elusive. Although PRRT has been used for more than 2 decades in Europe and standards of care exist for safe treatment, there remain numerous questions regarding when PRRT should be used relative to other treatments. It is important to remember that multidisciplinary discussions are essential. Currently, there are a number of ongoing studies looking to assess the efficacy of PRRT compared with other treatment options and to optimize treatment through combination therapy, different dosing strategies, or use of different radionuclides and radioligands.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Simple Summary

Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Mutant PPM1D- and TP53-Driven Hematopoiesis Populates the Hematopoietic Compartment in Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

PURPOSE

Hematologic toxic effects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be permanent. Patients with underlying clonal hematopoiesis (CH) may be more inclined to develop hematologic toxicity after PRRT. However, this association remains understudied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated pre- and post-PRRT blood samples of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. After initial screening, 13 cases of interest were selected. Serial blood samples were obtained on 4 of 13 patients. Genomic DNA was analyzed using a 100-gene panel. A variant allele frequency cutoff of 1% was used to call CH.

RESULT

Sixty-two percent of patients had CH at baseline. Persistent cytopenias were noted in 64% (7 of 11) of the patients. Serial sample analysis demonstrated that PRRT exposure resulted in clonal expansion of mutant DNA damage response genes (TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D) and accompanying cytopenias in 75% (3 of 4) of the patients. One patient who had a normal baseline hemogram and developed persistent cytopenias after PRRT exposure showed expansion of mutant PPM1D (variant allele frequency increased to 20% after exposure from < 1% at baseline). In the other two patients, expansion of mutant TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D clones was also noted along with cytopenia development.

CONCLUSION

The shifts in hematopoietic clonal dynamics in our study were accompanied by emergence and persistence of cytopenias. These cytopenias likely represent premalignant state, as PPM1D-, CHEK2-, and TP53-mutant clones by themselves carry a high risk for transformation to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Future studies should consider CH screening and longitudinal monitoring as a key risk mitigation strategy for patients with neuroendocrine tumors receiving PRRT.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer: Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice

The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration-labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.

Nordic guidelines 2021 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic work-up and treatment of patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) has undergone major advances and new methods are introduced. Furthermore, an update of the WHO classification has resulted in a new nomenclature for GEP-NEN that is implemented in the clinic.

AIM

These Nordic guidelines summarise the Nordic Neuroendocrine Tumour Group's current view on how to diagnose and treat GEP-NEN patients and aims to be useful in the daily practice for clinicians.

Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Which Systemic Treatment Should I Start With?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) often present as advanced disease and there is little data to guide treatment sequencing in the advance disease setting. Therefore, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the current evidence supporting the use of systemic treatment for patients with diagnosis of advanced and metastatic panNENs, as well as to provide strategies for treatment selection and address challenges for treatment selection and sequencing of therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Substantial advances have been made and many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options available for patients with advanced panNETs. Available systemic treatments for patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors include somatostatin receptors ligands (SRLs), traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT), and biologically targeted therapies, whereas patients with poorly differentiated neurodocrine carcinomas have more limited treatment options. Despite these advances, no clear guidelines exist to support the best sequence of treatments, not only the first-line, but also subsequent lines of therapy in patients with panNENs. Advances in molecular research and discovery of biomarkers for response allowing a more personalized approach to the multimodality therapy of panNENs are still limited. Understanding the impact of previous therapies on subsequent treatment efficacy and toxicity is also an ongoing research question. In the absence of definite predictive markers and paucity of comparative randomized trials, along with the heterogeneity of this patient population, systemic therapy selection in advanced non-resectable disease should be patient centered and often require evaluation within a multidisciplinary setting. The specific clinical context of the patient, with assessment of individual patient clinical and pathological features, somatostatin receptors imaging, and goals of treatment must all be considered when deciding on systemic therapy in the patient. Additional research is needed to address the gap in knowledge regarding optimal sequencing and timing of therapies and to provide individual care.

Radiological and Clinical Efficacy of Intra-Arterial 90Y-DOTATATE in Patients with Unresectable, Progressive, Liver Dominant Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This study was performed to determine if intra-arterial (i.a.) administration of ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE can provide an effective and safe alternative to the accepted standard for i.v. of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in liver-dominant metastases of gastrointestinal pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN). A single site, prospective, preliminary case series study included 39 patients with histologically proven liver-dominant NEN. PRRT in the form of 1.15GBq ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE was given selectively into the liver via radiological catheterization of the hepatic artery, up to four times. The endpoint was radiological response (RECIST). Secondary endpoints assessed clinical well-being post-treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Partial response (PR) was noted in 13% of subjects six weeks post-therapy, increasing to 24% at six months and dropping to 13% at 36 months. Disease progression (DP) was not seen at six weeks, was 5% at six months, and 47% at 36 months. Clinical response based on PS seen in 74% of patients at six weeks, 69% at six months, and 39% at 36 months had PFS and OS, respectively, of 22.7 months and 38.2 months. There was no difference in OS/PFS between those with RECIST PR and SD. One patient had significant toxicity (3%). Use of i.a. PRRT appears to be safe and effective in treating patients with liver-dominant NEN. In addition, the best OS (51 vs. 22 months) was seen when i.a. was used as an upfront treatment of bulky GEP-NEN liver metastases and not after i.v. ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE. The use of i.a. ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE PRRT appears to be safe and effective in treating patients with liver-dominant NEN.

What's new in the pathogenesis and treatment of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) include diseases onsetting in patients treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy for a primary cancer, or an autoimmune disorder. Genomic variants, in particular in familial cancer genes, may play a predisposing role. Recent advances in deep sequencing techniques have shed light on the pathogenesis of t-MN, identifying clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) as a frequent first step in the multi-hit model of t-MN. CHIP is often detectable prior to any cytotoxic treatment, probably setting the fertile genomic background for secondary leukemogenesis. The evolution pattern towards t-MN is then a complex process, shaped by the type of cancer therapy, the aging process, and the individual exposures, that favor additional hits, such as the acquisition of TP53 mutations and unfavorable karyotype abnormalities. The pathogenesis of t-MN differs from MN associated with environmental exposure. Indeed, the genetic aberration patterns of MN developing in atomic bomb survivors show few mutations in classical DNA methylation genes, and a high prevalence of 11q and ATM alterations, together with TP53 mutations. Survival in t-MN is poor. In addition to the biology of t-MN, the patient's previous disease history and the remission status at t-MN diagnosis are significant factors contributing to unfavorable outcome. New drugs active in secondary leukemias include CPX-351, or venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents, monoclonal antibodies as magrolimab, or targeted drugs against pathogenic mutations. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the best currently available therapeutic option with curative intent for fit patients with unfavorable genetic profiles.

Clinical Assessment of 177Lu-DOTATATE Quantification by Comparison of SUV-Based Parameters Measured on Both Post-PRRT SPECT/CT and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Feasibility Study

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with WD-GEP-NET who benefited from a pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and a 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT after the cycle 1 of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy were prospectively included. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed on a system calibrated with a conversion factor of 9.48 counts/MBq per second and were reconstructed with an iterative algorithm allowing quantification using the SPECTRA Quant software (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH). For each patient, different SUV parameters were recorded on both PET/CT (Ga parameters) and SPECT/CT (Lu parameters) for comparison: physiological uptakes (liver/spleen), tumor uptake (1-10/patient; SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV), tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-spleen ratios according to liver/spleen SUVmax and SUVmean (TLRmax, TLRmean, TSRmax, and TSRmean, respectively).

RESULTS

Ten patients (8 female; 2 male) aged from 50 to 83 years presenting with a metastatic progressive WD-GEP-NET (7 small intestine, 2 pancreas, 1 rectum) were included. Median values of lesional Lu-SUV were significantly lower than the corresponding Ga-SUV (P < 0.001), whereas median values of lesional Lu-MTV, Lu-TLR, and Lu-TSR were significantly higher than the corresponding Ga-MTV, Ga-TLR, and Ga-TSR (P < 0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients were strong for both SUV and MTV parameters (0.779-0.845), weak for TLR parameters (0.365-0.394), and moderate-to-strong for TSR parameters (0.676-0.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the feasibility of 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT quantification in clinical practice and show a strong correlation of several SUV-based parameters with the corresponding in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

Assessment of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: A Systematic Review

Importance

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a tumor-targeted treatment that uses radiation to induce tumor cell death in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) via β particle-emitting radionuclide linked to a somatostatin peptide analog. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) has been reported as a potential long-term and frequently lethal adverse event after PRRT. However, the incidence, time of diagnosis, and nature of t-MN is unclear. Therefore, a systematic review is helpful to study the incidence and characteristics of t-MN after PRRT in patients with NET.

Objective

To systematically evaluate the literature and report the incidence, time of diagnosis, and nature of t-MN after PRRT.

Evidence Review

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles and abstracts reporting studies of different designs studying more than 1 patient (randomized clinical trials, prospective phase I or phase II, retrospective studies, and case series) were searched from database inception through April 2019. Studies of interest included patients with NET who were treated with PRRT and reported the incidence of t-MN, if any. The primary outcome was the incidence of t-MN.

Findings

Twenty-eight articles were identified comprising 7334 patients who were treated with PRRT for NET. The main reason of exclusion was not reporting the t-MN incidence. The incidence of t-MN was variable between studies with mean (SD) incidence of 2.61% (4.38%). Of all 134 cases, cytogenetic abnormalities were reported in 32 patients with the most common abnormality being complex cytogenetics, consistent with myeloid neoplasms following exposure to alkylating agents or irradiation.

Conclusions and Relevance

The risk of t-MN after PRRT is small but not insignificant given the poor prognosis after t-MN diagnosis. Close monitoring is warranted to identify such patients early in the disease course when hematologic abnormalities persist.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in 1631 patients from our 20 years of experiences: prognostic parameters and overall survival

PURPOSE

To determine prognostic factors and overall survival (OS) in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) of patients after receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

METHODS

All patients treated from February 1999 until September 2019 at our center who had bone marrow biopsy-proven t-MN after PRRT were included. Patient characteristics, laboratory results, and all tumor-directed therapies before t-MN diagnosis were collected. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify parameters associated with OS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define cutoff values as well as sensitivity and specificity of the parameters.

RESULTS

Out of 1631 patients treated with PRRT, 30 patients developed t-MN comprising myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in 23 patients (77%) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 7 patients (23%). The median OS of t-MN patients was 13 months (range 9.1-16.9 months): 6 months for AML and 15 months for the MDS subgroup, respectively. Higher platelet level was a significant prognostic parameter for longer OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.99, P < 0.05). Using ROC analysis, the best cutoff value for thrombocyte count was 183.5 Gpt/L, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 50%. Other factors, such as hemoglobin level, did not show a significant correlation with OS.

CONCLUSION

Even rarely occurred, the OS is gravely compromised in t-MN patients after PRRT, and even less in the AML subgroup (6 months). Higher platelet value was a significant prognostic parameter for longer OS in t-MN patients.

Meeting report from the Prostate Cancer Foundation PSMA theranostics state of the science meeting

INTRODUCTION

The Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) convened a PCF prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Theranostics State of the Science Meeting on 18 November 2019, at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

METHODS

The meeting was attended by 22 basic, translational, and clinical researchers from around the globe, with expertise in PSMA biology, development and use of PSMA theranostics agents, and clinical trials. The goal of this meeting was to discuss the current state of knowledge, the most important biological and clinical questions, and critical next steps for the clinical development of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents and PSMA-targeted radionuclide agents for patients with prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Several major topic areas were discussed including the biology of PSMA, the role of PSMA-targeted PET imaging in prostate cancer, the physics and performance of different PSMA-targeted PET imaging agents, the current state of clinical development of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) agents, the role of dosimetry in PSMA RNT treatment planning, barriers and challenges in PSMA RNT clinical development, optimization of patient selection for PSMA RNT trials, and promising combination treatment approaches with PSMA RNT.

DISCUSSION

This article summarizes the presentations from the meeting for the purpose of globally disseminating this knowledge to advance the use of PSMA-targeted theranostic agents for imaging and treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

Australian experience of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in lung neuroendocrine tumours

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an approved treatment modality for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), Although Phase III randomised clinical trial data is not available for NETs of other site of origin, in practice, PRRT is used more widely in clinical practice, based on its mechanism of targeting the somatostatin receptor. Use of PRRT for lung (bronchial) NET, specifically typical and atypical carcinoid (TC, AC), has been reported only in small retrospective case series. This multicentre study adds to the evidence regarding utility of PRRT for lung NETs.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with TC and AC who received ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate PRRT between January 2002 and June 2019 in six hospitals across Australia was undertaken. Data regarding demographics, efficacy and toxicity was evaluated at each site by the treating clinician.

Results: Forty-eight patients (32 AC, 15 TC, 1 unclassified) received a median of four ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate treatments. There was a median of one prior line of systemic treatment (range: 0–3). The response rate to ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate was 33%, with a median overall survival of 49 months (range of 3–91), at a median follow up of 33 months. This compares favourably with GEP NET. Overall toxicity was recorded as modest.

Conclusions: ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate PRRT in patients with lung NETs is used in real world practice, where it appears well-tolerated with some efficacy. Further evidence could be obtained through a global prospective clinical or registry trial.

Influence of pretreatment with everolimus or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a validated treatment for somatostatin receptor overexpressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The NETTER-1 trial demonstrated a pronounced positive effect on progression-free-survival compared to high dose somatostatin analogs (SSAs), with a strong tendency toward overall survival benefit. Our aim was to investigate the influence of pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on subacute hematotoxicity of PRRT. To assess the influence of prior treatment with everolimus/sunitinib might be of clinical relevance due to the link between short-term hematotoxicity and increased incidence of late hematotoxicity.Material and methods: Our single-center retrospective study enrolled all patients treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE PRRT (1-4 cycles of 7.4 GBq), between November 2013 and July 2018. Patients were assigned to two groups according to their pretreatment: no targeted agents (N = 41), or targeted agents (everolimus, sunitinib or both; N = 41). The end point was subacute hematotoxicity, defined as the nadir value between the first administration until 3 months after the last administration, using the CTCAE 4.03 classification. The impact of splenectomy was also explored.Results: Eighty percent of patients had a primary gastroenteropancreatic NET. No statistically significant differences in severe subacute hematotoxicity were seen in the pretreated group vs. the naive group for hemoglobin (grade 3/4: 12% vs. 22%), neither for leucocytes (grade 3/4: 10% vs. 7%), neutrophils (grade 3/4: 5% vs. 7%), lymphocytes (grade 3/4: 49% vs. 37%) and platelets (grade 3/4: 15% vs. 15%). Furthermore, we observed significantly lower toxicity for total white blood cells, lymphocytes and platelets in the subgroup that had splenectomy (N = 12). Limitations of this study include the potential bias in lack of use of targeted agents in patients more susceptible to toxicity, and the limited number of patients and events.Conclusions: In a patient cohort with NET pretreated with everolimus and/or sunitinib, we could not demonstrate a significant effect of prior/pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recent Insights

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a paradigm shifting approach to the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are no prospective randomized trials directly studying PRRT in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), there are data to suggest benefit in this patient population. Collectively, the data, consisting of two prospective and six retrospective studies, show a median PFS ranging from 20 to 39 months and a median OS ranging from 37 to 79 months. There are ongoing (and upcoming) prospective, randomized trials of PRRT in panNETs, which will provide further evidence to support this approach.