18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with cardiac masses: a retrospective study

Hybrid cardiovascular imaging. A clinical consensus statement of the european association of nuclear medicine (EANM) and the european association of cardiovascular imaging (EACVI) of the ESC

Hybrid imaging consists of a combination of two or more imaging modalities, which equally contribute to image information. To date, hybrid cardiovascular imaging can be performed by either merging images acquired on different scanners, or with truly hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR scanners. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aim to review clinical situations that may benefit from the use of hybrid cardiac imaging and provide advice on acquisition protocols providing the most relevant information to reach diagnosis in various clinical situations.

Cardiac PET/MRI: Recent Developments and Future Aspects

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MRI) hybrid imaging is now available for over a decade and although the quantity of installed systems is rather low, the number of emerging applications for cardiovascular diseases is still growing. PET/MRI provides integrated images of high quality anatomical and functional assessment obtained by MRI with the possibilities of PET for quantification of molecular parameters such as metabolism, inflammation, and perfusion. In recent years, sequential co-registration of myocardial tissue characterization with its molecular data had become an increasingly helpful tool in clinical practice and an integrated device simplifies this task. This review summarizes recent developments and future possibilities in the use of the PET/MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Cardiac and Pericardial Neoplasms in Children: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Primary cardiac and pericardial neoplasms are rare in the pediatric population and can include both benign and malignant lesions. Rhabdomyomas, teratomas, fibromas, and hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors. The most common primary cardiac malignancies are soft-tissue sarcomas, including undifferentiated sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, and fibrosarcomas. However, metastatic lesions are more common than primary cardiac neoplasms. Children with primary cardiac and pericardial tumors may present with nonspecific cardiovascular symptoms, and their clinical presentation may mimic that of more common nonneoplastic cardiac disease. The diagnosis of cardiac tumors has recently been facilitated using noninvasive cardiac imaging. Echocardiography is generally the first-line modality for evaluation. Cardiac MRI and CT are used for tissue characterization and evaluation of tumor size, extension, and physiologic effect. The varied imaging appearances of primary cardiac neoplasms can be explained by their underlying abnormality. Treatment of these lesions varies from conservative management, with spontaneous regression of some lesions such as rhabdomyomas, to surgical resection, particularly in patients with associated heart failure. With adequate imaging techniques and knowledge of the pathologic basis of the neoplasm, it is often possible to differentiate benign from malignant tumors, which can greatly affect adequate and timely treatment. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Scope of PET imaging in the evaluation of cardiac tumors

Cardiac and pericardial masses can be categorized as neoplastic (either benign or malignant), non-neoplastic (such as thrombus or pericardial cysts), or normal variants of the cardiac structure. Diagnosing these masses can be challenging, and various imaging modalities are available, with each of them having advantages and pitfalls. Echocardiography is typically the first test used for the evaluation and detection of cardiac masses, as it is widely accessible, portable, and provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function and valves without the use of ionizing radiation. However, it may not be helpful in some cases, such as evaluating the extracardiac extension of the mass or characterizing tissue. On the other hand, cross-sectional imaging can provide a three-dimensional data set with excellent spatial resolution. Still, it requires ionizing radiation and intravenous iodinated contrast, and its functional evaluation of the heart may be relatively limited. 18F-FDG PET/CT helps determine 18F-FDG PET/CT is a crucial molecular imaging modality to assess and differentiate benign and malignant cardiac tumors noninvasively and helps in treatment planning and prognostication. Currently, studies evaluating the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac tumors are limited to case reports and single center studies.

Melanin-targeted [18F]-PFPN PET imaging for prognosticating patients with melanoma

PURPOSE

Positron emission tomography (PET) using [18F]-PFPN, a melanin-targeted imaging tracer, has excellent diagnostic performance in patients with melanoma. This study aimed to investigate its value in prognostication and determine predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We reviewed melanoma patients who underwent [18F]-PFPN and [18F]-FDG PET from February 2021 to July 2022. Clinical characteristics, follow-up data, and the following [18F]-PFPN PET parameters were recorded: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), whole-body melanotic tumoral volume (WBMTV), and whole-body total lesion melanin (WBTLM). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (47 men and 29 women; mean age, 57.99 ± 10.72 years) were included for analysis. Median follow-up was 12.0 months (range: 1-22 months). Eighteen patients died and 38 experienced progression. Median OS was 17.60 months (95% confidence interval, 15.89-19.31). In the ROC analysis, [18F]-PFPN PET parameters were superior to those of [18F]-FDG PET in prognosticating death and disease progression. PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with lower SUVmax, WBMTV, and WBTLM on [18F]-PFPN PET (log-rank, P < 0.05). In the univariate analyses, distant metastasis, SUVmax, WBMTV, and WBTLM were significantly associated with cumulative incidence of PFS and OS (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, SUVmax was an independent predictor of PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]-PFPN PET has a role in prognostication of melanoma patients. Patients with higher [18F]-PFPN SUVmax have worse prognosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05645484. Registered 9 December, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05645484?cond=The+Prognostic+Value+of+18F-PFPN+PET+Imaging+in+Patients+With+Malignant+Melanoma&draw=2&rank=1.

Expert review for clinical and translational imaging actionable imaging findings in the daily PET/CT scenario

Background and aim

The American College of Radiology (ACR) defines "actionable findings" the ones requiring a special communication between radiologists and referring clinicians, suggesting to organize their categorization in a three-degree scale on the basis of the risk for the patient to develop complications. These cases may fall in a grey-zone communication between different care figures with the risk of being underestimated or even not being considered at all. In this paper, our aim is to adapt the ACR categorization to the most frequent actionable findings encountered when reporting PET/CT images in a Nuclear Medicine Department, describing the most frequent and relevant imaging features and presenting the modalities of communication and the related clinical interventions that can be modulated by the prognostic severity of the clinical cases.

Materials and methods

We performed a descriptive, observational and critical analysis of the most relevant literature on the topic of "actionable findings", in particular, starting from the reports of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group, we categorised and described, in a narrative review, the most relevant "actionable findings" encountered in the Nuclear Medicine PET/CT daily practice.

Results

To the best of our knowledge, to date there are no clear indications on this selective PET/CT topic, considering that the current recommendations target mainly radiologists and assume a certain level of radiological expertise. We resumed and classified the main imaging conditions under the term of "actionable findings" according to the corresponding anatomical districts, and we described their most relevant imaging features (independently of PET avidity or not). Furthermore, a different communication timing and strategy was suggested on the basis of the findings' urgency.

Conclusion

A systematic categorization of the actionable imaging findings according to their prognostic severity may help the reporting physician to choose how and when to communicate with the referring clinician or to identify cases requiring a prompt clinical evaluation. Effective communication is a critical component of diagnostic imaging: timely receipt of the information is more important than the method of delivery.

Clinical characteristics of primary atrial tumor and their diagnostic value: A retrospective study of 10 years

Background

Primary atrial tumors are relatively rare and predominantly benign. However, some atrial tumors may be malignant and are associated with poor outcome. Currently, it is hard to determine the malignance of atrial tumors by preoperative clinical presentation or by echocardiography. We aimed to report the difference in the clinical characteristics of patients with benign and malignant atrial tumor.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 194 patients with primary atrial tumor admitted to our center between 2012 and 2021 were included. The clinical characteristics of patients with benign and malignant tumor were compared.

Results

Benign and malignant tumor accounted for 93% (n = 180) and 7% (n = 14) of the total patients, respectively. Malignant atrial tumor tended to occur in younger patients (P < 0.05), was more likely to be located at the right atrium (P < 0.05), and tended to attach to the atrial wall or valve instead of the atrial septum. Fever symptoms were more common in patients with malignant tumors than in patients with benign tumors (P < 0.05). Compared to benign tumor, patients with malignant atrial tumor also demonstrated higher rates of fever, lower rates of increasing fibrinogen, increased blood glucose (P < 0.05), significantly longer prothrombin time, and lower prothrombin activity (P < 0.05). Patients with malignant primary atrial tumor had higher mortality rate, tumor metastasis rate, and tumor recurrence rate than patients with benign primary atrial tumor (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

We compared the clinical characteristics of patients with benign and malignant atrial tumor. These findings provide valuable information to preoperatively determine the malignance of atrial tumor and thus guide surgical treatment.

Incremental value of combinatorial contrast echocardiography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in giant right atrial myxomas

Although several studies have shown that myocardial contrast echocardiography and 18-FDG PET/CT can differentiate between benign and malignant intracardiac masses, it is rarely used in practice to evaluate myxoma. This case describes the contrast echocardiography and 18-FDG PET/CT findings of a giant myxoma with an atypical location and subclinical symptoms.

Diagnostic challenges in primary cardiac lymphoma, the opportunity of 18F-FDG PET/CT integrated with contrast-enhanced CT

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT integrated with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in the differential diagnosis of primary cardiac lymphomas (PCLs) and primary cardiac angiosarcomas (PCAs).

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data of patients with PCLs and PCAs were collected. All patients underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and thoracic CECT. The enhancement pattern and tumor morphology were analyzed using CECT images. The intensity- and volume-based PET parameters of cardiac lesions were analyzed. The performance characteristics of all parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine patients with PCL and eight patients with PCA were analyzed. There were significant differences in SUVmax (t = 3.790, P = .002), SUVmean (t = 4.273, P = .001), metabolic tumor volume (U = 13.00, P = .027), tumor-to-liver ratio (U = 10.00, P = .011), and total lesion glycolysis (U = 4.0, P = .001) between PCLs and PC18As. There were significant differences in the enhancement pattern of tumors (P = .002) and tumor morphology (P = .015). The combination of F-FDG PET/CT and CECT improved the diagnostic accuracy, and the combination cutoff (SUVmean > 5.17) could reach 100%, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The intensity- and volume-based PET parameters of PCL were significantly higher than those of PCA. The enhancement pattern and tumor morphology were also different. According to these characteristics, the two most common types of primary cardiac malignancies can be differentiated.

Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Pediatric Cardiac Masses: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

After diagnosis of a cardiac mass, clinicians must weigh the benefits and risks of ascertaining a tissue diagnosis. Limited data are available on the accuracy of previously developed noninvasive pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based diagnostic criteria.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to: 1) evaluate the CMR characteristics of pediatric cardiac masses from a large international cohort; 2) test the accuracy of previously developed CMR-based diagnostic criteria; and 3) expand diagnostic criteria using new information.

METHODS

CMR studies (children 0-18 years of age) with confirmatory histological and/or genetic diagnosis were analyzed by 2 reviewers, without knowledge of prior diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was graded as: 1) single correct diagnosis; 2) correct diagnosis among a differential; or 3) incorrect diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 213 cases, 174 (82%) had diagnoses that were represented in the previously published diagnostic criteria. In 70% of 174 cases, both reviewers achieved a single correct diagnosis (94% of fibromas, 71% of rhabdomyomas, and 50% of myxomas). When ≤2 differential diagnoses were included, both reviewers reached a correct diagnosis in 86% of cases. Of 29 malignant tumors, both reviewers indicated malignancy as a single diagnosis in 52% of cases. Including ≤2 differential diagnoses, both reviewers indicated malignancy in 83% of cases. Of 6 CMR sequences examined, acquisition of first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement were independently associated with a higher likelihood of a single correct diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR of cardiac masses in children leads to an accurate diagnosis in most cases. A comprehensive imaging protocol is associated with higher diagnostic accuracy.

Multimodality imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant cardiac masses

BACKGROUND

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CMR and FDG-PET/CT and their complementary role to distinguish benign vs malignant cardiac masses.

METHODS

Retrospectively assessed patients with cardiac mass who underwent CMR and FDG-PET/CT within a month between 2003 and 2018.

RESULTS

72 patients who had CMR and FDG-PET/CT were included. 25 patients (35%) were diagnosed with benign and 47 (65%) were diagnosed with malignant masses. 56 patients had histological correlation: 9 benign and 47 malignant masses. CMR and FDG-PET/CT had a high accuracy in differentiating benign vs malignant masses, with the presence of CMR features demonstrating a higher sensitivity (98%), while FDG uptake with SUVmax/blood pool ≥ 3.0 demonstrating a high specificity (88%). Combining multiple (> 4) CMR features and FDG uptake (SUVmax/blood pool ratio ≥ 3.0) yielded a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 88% to diagnose malignant masses. Over a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (IQR 0.3-3.8 years), risk-adjusted mortality were highest among patients with an infiltrative border on CMR (adjusted HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5-6.5; P = .002) or focal extracardiac FDG uptake (adjusted HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.9-7.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although CMR and FDG-PET/CT can independently diagnose benign and malignant masses, the combination of these modalities provides complementary value in select cases.

Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic performance of F-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and conventional imaging, including MRI, echocardiography, and CT, in characterising cardiac masses.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracies of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging in characterising cardiac masses, from inception of indexing to 31 July 2020, was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess study quality. Sensitivity and specificity across the studies were determined, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-, respectively) were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.

RESULTS

Of six included studies (n = 212 patients), 18F-FDG PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 7.9 (95% CI 4.3-14.6) and LR- of 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.22). The calculated pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 64 (95% CI 23-181). For conventional imaging, the pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.81) and the pooled specificity was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.98). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 16.1 (95% CI 5.8-44.5) and LR- of 0.31 (95% CI 0.21-0.46). The evaluated pooled DOR was 52 (95% CI 17-155).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracies for the characterisation of cardiac masses. Further large multicentre studies are, however, required to corroborate the diagnostic performances of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for the characterisation of cardiac masses.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

No previous studies have comprehensively analysed the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques including echocardiography, CT, and MRI. According to the current study, 18F-FDG PET/CT yielded a pooled DOR of 64, whereas other conventional imaging techniques demonstrated a DOR of 52. As such, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity and specificity, with a high pooled DOR comparable with other conventional imaging modalities.

Diagnosis and staging of cardiac masses: additional value of CMR with 18F-FDG-PET compared to CMR with CECT

PURPOSE

Characterization of malignant cardiac masses is usually performed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and staging with whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). In this study, our objective was to evaluate the role of 18Fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) with CMR for both characterization and staging of cardiac masses.

METHODS

Patients with cardiac masses who underwent CMR, CECT, and 18F-FDG-PET were retrospectively identified. For the characterization of cardiac masses, we calculated the respective performances of CMR alone, 18F-FDG-PET alone, and the combination of 18F-FDG-PET and CMR. For staging, we compared head-to-head the respective performances of 18F-FDG-PET and CECT. Histology served as gold standard for malignancy, and response to anticoagulation for thrombus.

RESULTS

In a total of 28 patients (median age 60.5 years, 60.7% women), CMR accurately distinguished malignant from benign masses with sensitivity (Se) of 86.7%, specificity (Sp) of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.7%, and accuracy of 92.9%. 18F-FDG-PET demonstrated 93.3% Se, 84.6% Sp, 87.5% PPV, 91.7% NPV, and 89.3% accuracy. Combining CMR with 18F-FDG-PET allowed to benefit from the high sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET (92.9%) and the excellent specificity of CMR (100%) for malignant diseases. For staging, 18F-FDG-PET outperformed CECT on per-patient (66.7% vs 55.6% correct diagnosis, respectively), per-organ (10 vs 7 organs, respectively), and per-lesion basis (> 29 vs > 25 lesions, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Combining 18F-FDG-PET with CMR improved the characterization of cardiac masses compared to each modality alone. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET was better than CECT for staging. This study suggests that the combination of CMR and 18F-FDG-PET is the most effective for the characterization of cardiac masses and the staging of these lesions.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses

BACKGROUND

Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. 18F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). 18F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.

Cardiac Metastasis from Medullary Thyroid Cancers with Long-Term Survival under Vandetanib

BACKGROUND

Cardiac metastases from thyroid cancers are uncommon with a poor prognosis. There is a lack of long-term follow-up studies.

CASES

We report 2 cases of cardiac metastasis from medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Both patients presented limited metastatic disease apart from a cardiac metastasis. The initial diagnosis was challenging and was facilitated by functional imaging with an immuno-PET-CT using an anti-CEA bispecific antibody and a ⁶⁸Ga-labeled peptide. Both patients were treated with the multitarget kinase inhibitor vandetanib with prolonged stability. The first patient was alive at the last follow-up, 14 years after the diagnosis of cardiac metastasis. The second patient required surgical excision of the cardiac mass because of disease progression under vandetanib.

CONCLUSION

These cases illustrate long-term survival and effectiveness of clinical management of 2 patients who developed cardiac metastases from MTC, in the current era of personalized medicine with targeted therapy.

Incremental Value of FDG-PET in the Evaluation of Cardiac Masses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aims to review the various roles and evidence underlying the use of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and PET/MR for the assessment of cardiac masses.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of FDG-PET for the evaluation of cardiac masses continues to evolve. Studies have shown that FDG-PET is particularly well-suited for differentiating malignant from benign cardiac lesions based on their metabolic activity. Furthermore, FDG-PET is uniquely positioned to investigate patients with cardiac mass as most malignant cardiac lesions are metastasis. Finally, FDG-PET enables staging of patients with primary malignant cardiac tumor, identification of potential biopsy site, and planning of radiotherapy. FDG-PET is a complementary tool for the evaluation of patients with cardiac mass and can help differentiate benign from malignant lesions, as well as provide whole-body staging.

Comparison of the Gross Target Volumes Based on Diagnostic PET/CT for Primary Esophageal Cancer

Background

Clinically, many esophageal cancer patients who planned for radiation therapy have already undergone diagnostic Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging, but it remains unclear whether these imaging results can be used to delineate the gross target volume (GTV) of the primary tumor for thoracic esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Seventy-two patients diagnosed with thoracic EC had undergone prior PET/CT for diagnosis and three-dimensional CT (3DCT) for simulation. The GTV_3D was contoured on the 3DCT image without referencing the PET/CT image. The GTV_PET-ref was contoured on the 3DCT image referencing the PET/CT image. The GTV_PET-reg was contoured on the deformed registration image derived from 3DCT and PET/CT. Differences in the position, volume, length, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) among the target volumes were determined.

Results

The centroid distance in the three directions between two different GTVs showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found among the groups in the tumor volume (P > 0.05). The median DI values of the GTV_PET-reg and GTV_PET-ref in the GTV_3D were 0.82 and 0.86, respectively (P = 0.006). The median CI values of the GTV_3D in the GTV_PET-reg and GTV_PET-ref were 0.68 and 0.72, respectively (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

PET/CT can be used to optimize the definition of the target volume in EC. However, no significant difference was found between the GTVs delineated based on visual referencing or deformable registration whether using the volume or position. So, in the absence of planning PET–CT images, it is also feasible to delineate the GTV of primary thoracic EC with reference to the diagnostic PET–CT image.

The diagnosis of a giant cardiac malignant lymphoma in the right ventricle: a case report

Cardiac lymphoma is extremely rare in patients with normal immune function and difficult to identify through routine examinations in patients with atypical clinical manifestations, making early diagnosis very difficult. We reported a 71‐year‐old male patient who was repeatedly diagnosed of pulmonary infection, suspected lung tumour, and Kimura disease in other hospital due to cough, expectoration, and dyspnoea. Later on, the patient visited our hospital due to heart failure and epistaxis. Transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed the presence of a space‐occupying lesion in the right heart, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging preliminarily determined the nature of this lesion, finally, ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography/computed tomography, and nasal mass biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of cardiac malignant lymphoma, and the pathological type was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.

Incidence, prognostic significance, and survival outcomes of primary cardiac sarcoma: An updated population-based retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Primary cardiac sarcoma, a rare tumor with an aggressive course and imprecise prognosis, constitutes over 95% of all malignant cardiac tumors. Given the sparsely available evidence, there is a paucity of information regarding current knowledge on cardiac sarcoma. This study aimed to determine the incidence and incidence-based rates, patient characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival factors of cardiac sarcoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the incidence, incidence-based mortality rates and characteristics of cardiac sarcoma between 1975 and 2016 was carried out using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression program was used to calculate the Annual Percentage Changes (APC). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine the survival characteristics.

RESULTS

A total 408 patients were identified for the incidence analysis, while 385 eligible patients were identified for the survival analysis. The mean age at diagnosis was 46.3±17.9 years. The incidence rate (per 100.000 per year) of cardiac sarcoma within the indicated years was 0.22, with an increased APC of 1.7 (p=0.013, 95% CI=0.5-2.9). A total of 251 (61.5%) patients underwent surgery, 93 (22.8%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 197 (50.2%) patients received chemotherapy. Surgical resection, chemotherapy, stage of tumor, and younger age significantly improved the survival outcomes (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac sarcoma is a rare type of soft tissue sarcomas with poor prognosis. Over the past 30 years, the incidence of cardiac sar-coma has been on the increase. Surgery remains the mainstay of management. Further studies are needed to compare different diagnostic and treatment modalities so as to ascertain the best treatment option that would enhance survival and prognosis of cardiac sarcoma.