1
|
Schürrle SB, Eberlein U, Ansquer C, Beauregard JM, Durand-Gasselin L, Grønbæk H, Haug A, Hicks RJ, Lenzo NP, Navalkissoor S, Nicolas GP, Pais B, Volteau M, Wild D, McEwan A, Lassmann M. Dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of [ 177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2428-2441. [PMID: 38528164 PMCID: PMC11178655 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06682-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of the novel radiolabelled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS This study was part of a phase I/II trial of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three planned cycles (median activity/cycle: 4.5 GBq), in 40 patients with progressive NETs. Organ absorbed doses were monitored at each cycle using patient-specific dosimetry; the cumulative absorbed-dose limits were set at 23.0 Gy for the kidneys and 1.5 Gy for bone marrow. Absorbed dose coefficients (ADCs) were calculated using both patient-specific and model-based dosimetry for some patients. RESULTS In all evaluated organs, maximum [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan uptake was observed at the first imaging timepoint (4 h after injection), followed by an exponential decrease. Kidneys were the main route of elimination, with a cumulative excretion of 57-66% within 48 h following the first treatment cycle. At the first treatment cycle, [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a median terminal blood half-life of 127 h and median ADCs of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan were 5.0 Gy/GBq in tumours, 0.1 Gy/GBq in the bone marrow, 0.9 Gy/GBq in kidneys, 0.2 Gy/GBq in the liver and 0.8 Gy/GBq in the spleen. Using image-based dosimetry, the bone marrow and kidneys received median cumulative absorbed doses of 1.1 and 10.8 Gy, respectively, after three cycles. CONCLUSION [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a favourable dosimetry profile, with high and prolonged tumour uptake, supporting its acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Henning Grønbæk
- Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Aarhus University Hospital and Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alexander Haug
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, the Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nat P Lenzo
- GenesisCare, East Fremantle, WA, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Shaunak Navalkissoor
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Guillaume P Nicolas
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ben Pais
- SRT-Biomedical B.V, Soest, Netherlands.
- Ariceum Therapeutics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Damian Wild
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yadav S, Jiang F, Kurkowska S, Saelee R, Morley A, Feng F, Aggarwal R, Lawhn-Heath C, Uribe C, Hope TA. Assessing Response to PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapies with Single SPECT Imaging at 24 Hours After Injection. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1064-1069. [PMID: 38724282 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between lesion-absorbed dose and tumor response in 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) remains complex. We aimed to investigate whether baseline lesion-absorbed dose can predict lesion-based responses and to explore the connection between lesion-absorbed dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 50 patients with 335 index lesions undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT, who had dosimetry analysis performed on SPECT/CT at 24 h after cycles 1 and 2. First, we identified the index lesions for each patient and measured the lesion-based absorbed doses. Lesion-based response was calculated after cycle 2. Additionally, PSA50 response (a decline of 50% from baseline PSA) after cycle 2 was also calculated. The respective responses for mean and maximum absorbed doses and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) volumetric intensity product (VIP-PSMA) at cycles 1 and 2 were termed SPECTmean, SPECTmaximum, and SPECTVIP-PSMA, respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients reviewed, 46% achieved a PSA50 response after cycle 2. Of the 335 index lesions, 58% were osseous, 32% were lymph nodes, and 10% were soft-tissue metastatic lesions. The SPECT lesion-based responses were higher in PSA responders than in nonresponders (SPECTmean response of 46.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.2% ± 24.5%, P = 0.007; SPECTmaximum response of 45% ± 25.1% vs. 19% ± 27.0%, P = 0.001; SPECTVIP-PSMA response of 49.2% ± 30.3% vs. 14% ± 34.7%, P = 0.0005). An association was observed between PSA response and SPECTVIP-PSMA response (R 2 = 0.40 and P < 0.0001). A limited relationship was found between baseline absorbed dose measured with a 24-h single time point and SPECT lesion-based response (R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.001, and R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.007, for mean and maximum absorbed doses, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, quantitative lesion-based response correlated with patient-level PSA response. We observed a limited relationship between baseline absorbed dose and lesion-based responses. Most of the variance in response remains unexplained solely by baseline absorbed dose. Establishment of a dose-response relationship in RPT with a single time point at 24 h presented some limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Fei Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sara Kurkowska
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rachelle Saelee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Amanda Morley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; and
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hebert K, Santoro L, Monnier M, Castan F, Berkane I, Assénat E, Fersing C, Gélibert P, Pouget JP, Bardiès M, Kotzki PO, Deshayes E. Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE: One Step Closer to Personalized Medicine. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:923-930. [PMID: 38637144 PMCID: PMC11149595 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been approved for progressive and inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) that overexpress somatostatin receptors. The absorbed doses by limiting organs and tumors can be quantified by serial postinfusion scintigraphy measurements of the γ-emissions from 177Lu. The objective of this work was to explore how postinfusion [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry could influence clinical management by predicting treatment efficacy (tumor shrinkage and survival) and toxicity. Methods: Patients with GEP-NETs treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE between 2016 and 2022 and who underwent dosimetry were included. Absorbed doses were calculated for healthy organs (liver, kidneys, bone marrow, and spleen) and tumors using PLANET Dose and the local energy deposition method based on serial posttreatment SPECT/CT. Up to 5 lesions per site were selected and measured on images collected at baseline and 3 mo after treatment end (measurement masked to the somatostatin receptor imaging uptake). For toxicity assessment, laboratory parameters were regularly monitored. Clinical data, including time to death or progression, were collected from the patients' health records. Correlations between absorbed doses by organs and toxicity and between absorbed doses by lesions and tumor volume variation were studied using regression models. Results: In total, 35 dosimetric studies were performed in patients with mostly grade 2 (77%) tumors and metastases in liver (89%), lymph nodes (77%), and bone (34%), and 146 lesions were analyzed: 1-9 lesions per patient, mostly liver metastases (65%) and lymph nodes (25%). The median total absorbed dose by tumors was 94.4 Gy. The absorbed doses by tumors significantly decreased between cycles. The absorbed dose by tumors was significantly associated with tumor volume variation (P < 0.001) 3 mo after treatment end, and it was a significant prognostic factor for survival. Toxicity analysis showed a correlation between the decrease of hematologic parameters such as lymphocytes or platelet concentrations and the absorbed doses by the spleen or bone marrow. The mean absorbed dose by the kidneys was not correlated with nephrotoxicity during the studied period. Conclusion: In patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE for GEP-NETs, tumor and healthy organ dosimetry can predict survival and toxicities, thus influencing clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kévin Hebert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Lore Santoro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maeva Monnier
- Biometry Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometry Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Ikrame Berkane
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Assénat
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Cyril Fersing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Biometry Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IBMM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France; and
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Manuel Bardiès
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre-Olivier Kotzki
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France;
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Strosberg J, Hofman MS, Al-Toubah T, Hope TA. Rethinking Dosimetry: The Perils of Extrapolated External-Beam Radiotherapy Constraints to Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:362-364. [PMID: 38212065 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida;
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
| | - Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dieudonné A, Bailly C, Cachin F, Edet-Sanson A, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Hapdey S, Merlin C, Robin P, Salaun PY, Schwartz P, Tonnelet D, Vera P, Courbon F, Carlier T. Dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy in routine clinical practice: experts advice vs. clinical evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:947-950. [PMID: 38110711 PMCID: PMC10881593 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06568-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Dieudonné
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France.
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76000, Rouen, France.
| | - Clément Bailly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Florent Cachin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Agathe Edet-Sanson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | | | - Sébastien Hapdey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Charles Merlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Philippe Robin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Brest, France
| | | | - Paul Schwartz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - David Tonnelet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Pierre Vera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Frédéric Courbon
- Department of Medical Imaging, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Carlier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bauckneht M, Ciccarese C, Laudicella R, Mosillo C, D'Amico F, Anghelone A, Strusi A, Beccia V, Bracarda S, Fornarini G, Tortora G, Iacovelli R. Theranostics revolution in prostate cancer: Basics, clinical applications, open issues and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102698. [PMID: 38359590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
In the last years, theranostics has expanded the therapeutic options available for prostate cancer patients. In this review, we explore this dynamic field and its potential to revolutionize precision medicine for prostate cancer. We delve into the foundational principles, clinical applications, and emerging opportunities, emphasizing the potential synergy between radioligand therapy and other systemic treatments. Additionally, we address the ongoing challenges, including optimizing patient selection, assessing treatment responses, and determining the role of theranostics within the broader landscape of prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Claudia Mosillo
- Oncologia Medica e Traslazionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Amico
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Strusi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Viria Beccia
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Oncologia Medica e Traslazionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yadav S, Lawhn-Heath C, Paciorek A, Lindsay S, Mirro R, Bergsland EK, Hope TA. The Impact of Posttreatment Imaging in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:409-415. [PMID: 38428966 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Posttreatment imaging of γ-emissions after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be used to perform quantitative dosimetry as well as assessment response using qualitative measures. We aimed to assess the impact of qualitative posttreatment imaging on the management of patients undergoing PRRT. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 100 patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, who had posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging at 24 h. First, we evaluated the qualitative assessment of response at each cycle. Then using a chart review, we determined the impact on management from the posttreatment imaging. The changes in management were categorized as major or minor, and the cycles at which these changes occurred were noted. Additionally, tumor grade was also evaluated. Results: Of the 100 sequential patients reviewed, most (80% after cycle 2, 79% after cycle 3, and 73% after cycle 4) showed qualitatively stable disease during PRRT. Management changes were observed in 27% (n = 27) of patients; 78% of those (n = 21) were major, and 30% (n = 9) were minor. Most treatment changes occurred after cycle 2 (33% major, 67% minor) and cycle 3 (62% major, 33% minor). Higher tumor grade correlated with increased rate of changes in management (P = 0.006). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, qualitative analysis of posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging informed changes in management in 27% of patients. Patients with higher-grade tumors had a higher rate of change in management, and most of the management changes occurred after cycles 2 and 3. Incorporating posttreatment imaging into standard PRRT workflows could potentially enhance patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alan Paciorek
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sheila Lindsay
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rebecca Mirro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
George SC, Tolakanahalli R, Aguirre S, Kim TP, Samuel EJJ, Mishra V. A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1331266. [PMID: 38469241 PMCID: PMC10925616 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1331266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Implementing any radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) program requires a comprehensive review of system readiness, appropriate workflows, and training to ensure safe and efficient treatment delivery. A quantitative assessment of the dose delivered to targets and organs at risk (OAR) using RPT is possible by correlating the absorbed doses with the delivered radioactivity. Integrating dosimetry into an established RPT program demands a thorough analysis of the necessary components and system fine-tuning. This study aims to report an optimized workflow for molecular radiation therapy using 177Lu with a primary focus on integrating patient-specific dosimetry into an established radiopharmaceutical program in a radiation oncology setting. Materials and methods We comprehensively reviewed using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, including efficacy and accuracy of delivery and all aspects of radiation safety of the RPT program. The GE Discovery SPECT/CT 670DR™ system was calibrated per MIM protocol for dose calculation on MIM SurePlan™ MRT software. Jaszcak Phantom with 15-20 mCi of 177Lu DOTATATE with 2.5 µM EDTA solution was used, with the main energy window defined as 208 keV ±10% (187.6 to 229.2 keV); the upper scatter energy window was set to 240 keV ±5% (228 to 252 keV), while the lower scatter energy window was 177.8 keV ±5% (168.9 to 186.7 keV). Volumetric quality control tests and adjustments were performed to ensure the correct alignment of the table, NM, and CT gantry on SPECT/CT. A comprehensive end-to-end (E2E) test was performed to ensure workflow, functionality, and quantitative dose accuracy. Results Workflow improvements and checklists are presented after systematically analyzing over 400 administrations of 177Lu-based RPT. Injected activity to each sphere in the NEMA Phantom scan was quantified, and the MIM Sureplan MRT reconstruction images calculated activities within ±12% of the injected activity. Image alignment tests on the SPECT/CT showed a discrepancy of more than the maximum tolerance of 2.2 mm on any individual axis. As a result of servicing the machine and updating the VQC and COR corrections, the hybrid imaging system was adjusted to achieve an accuracy of <1 mm in all directions. Conclusion Workflows and checklists, after analysis of system readiness and adequate training for staff and patients, are presented. Hardware and software components for patient-specific dosimetry are presented with a focus on hybrid image registration and correcting any errors that affect dosimetric quantification calculation. Moreover, this manuscript briefly overviews the necessary quality assurance requirements for converting diagnostic images into dosimetry measurement tools and integrating dosimetry for RPT based on 177Lu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siju C. George
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
| | - Ranjini Tolakanahalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Santiago Aguirre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Taehyung Peter Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Vivek Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ha S, Kim YI, Oh JS, Yoo C, Ryoo BY, Ryu JS. Prediction of [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy response using the absorbed dose estimated from [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:14. [PMID: 38315270 PMCID: PMC10844176 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00620-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Personalised dosimetry is crucial to optimise treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the tumour-absorbed dose (TAD) estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and the therapeutic response. METHOD A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs grades 1-3 who underwent PRRT and exhibited greater uptake than liver on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Target lesions were selected based on the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and pre-therapeutic contrast-enhanced CT scans. For anatomical image analysis, the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of the target lesions was measured using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for patient-based analysis and the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesion using the RECIST-L criteria for lesion-based analysis. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) were measured on SPECT/CT images, and TADs were calculated based on the SUVs. Dosimetry was performed using a single SPECT/CT imaging time point at day 4-5 post-therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate correlations and determine the target lesion responses. RESULTS Twenty patients with primary tumour sites and hepatic metastases were included. Fifty-five target lesions, predominantly located in the pancreas and liver, were analysed. The cumulative TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.299-0.301, p = 0.025-0.027), but not the cycle 1 SUV (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.198-0.206, p = 0.131-0.147) or cycle 1 TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.209-0.217, p = 0.112-0.126), exhibited a significant correlation with the change in LD of the target lesion. Binary logistic regression analysis identified the significance of the cumulative TAD in predicting disease control according to the RECIST-L criteria (odds ratio = 1.031-1.051, p = 0.024-0.026). CONCLUSIONS The cumulative TAD estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT revealed a significant correlation with change in LD, which was significantly higher for the cumulative TAD than for the cycle 1 SUV or TAD. A higher cumulative TAD was associated with disease control in the target lesion. However, considering the limitations inherent to a confined sample size, careful interpretation of these findings is required. Estimation of the cumulative TAD of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy could guide the platform towards personalised therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sejin Ha
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jungsu S Oh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Sook Ryu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giraudet AL. [Combination of internal and external beam radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:754-758. [PMID: 37953187 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy and internal vectorized radiation therapy are two types of radiotherapy that can be used to treat cancer. They differ in the way they are administered, and the type of radiation used. Although they can be effective in treating cancer, they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and their combination could be synergistic. Preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy have mainly used radiolabelled antibodies, whose bone marrow toxicity remains the limiting factor in increasing the administered activities. The use of small radioligands in clinical trials has shown to be better tolerated and more effective, which explains their rapid development. The results of preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy appear heterogeneous, making it impossible to determine an ideal therapeutic sequencing scheme, and complicating the transposition to clinical studies. The few clinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy available to date have demonstrated feasibility and tolerability. More work remains to be done in the fields of dosimetry and radiobiology, as well as in the sequencing of these two irradiation modalities to optimize their combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-L Giraudet
- Centre Léon-Bérard, 15, rue Gabriel-Sarrazin, 69008 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|