Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy response using the absorbed dose estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Personalised dosimetry is crucial to optimise treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the tumour-absorbed dose (TAD) estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and the therapeutic response.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs grades 1-3 who underwent PRRT and exhibited greater uptake than liver on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Target lesions were selected based on the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and pre-therapeutic contrast-enhanced CT scans. For anatomical image analysis, the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of the target lesions was measured using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for patient-based analysis and the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesion using the RECIST-L criteria for lesion-based analysis. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) were measured on SPECT/CT images, and TADs were calculated based on the SUVs. Dosimetry was performed using a single SPECT/CT imaging time point at day 4-5 post-therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate correlations and determine the target lesion responses.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with primary tumour sites and hepatic metastases were included. Fifty-five target lesions, predominantly located in the pancreas and liver, were analysed. The cumulative TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.299-0.301, p = 0.025-0.027), but not the cycle 1 SUV (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.198-0.206, p = 0.131-0.147) or cycle 1 TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.209-0.217, p = 0.112-0.126), exhibited a significant correlation with the change in LD of the target lesion. Binary logistic regression analysis identified the significance of the cumulative TAD in predicting disease control according to the RECIST-L criteria (odds ratio = 1.031-1.051, p = 0.024-0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative TAD estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT revealed a significant correlation with change in LD, which was significantly higher for the cumulative TAD than for the cycle 1 SUV or TAD. A higher cumulative TAD was associated with disease control in the target lesion. However, considering the limitations inherent to a confined sample size, careful interpretation of these findings is required. Estimation of the cumulative TAD of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy could guide the platform towards personalised therapy.

Radiation exposure assessment of nuclear medicine staff administering [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE with active and passive dosimetry

BACKGROUND

The use of lutetium-177 (177Lu)-based radiopharmaceuticals in peptide receptor nuclear therapy is increasing, but so is the number of nuclear medicine workers exposed to higher levels of radiation. In recent years, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has begun to be widely used for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. However, there are few studies evaluating the occupational radiation exposure during its administration, and there are still some challenges that can result in higher doses to the staff, such as a lack of trained personnel or fully standardised procedures. In response, this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of occupational doses to the staff involved in the administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

RESULTS

A total of 32 administrations of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (7.4 GBq/session) carried out by a physician and a nurse, were studied. In total, two physicians and four nurses were independently monitored with cumulative (passive) and/or real-time (active) dosemeters. Extremity, eye lens and whole-body doses were evaluated in terms of the dosimetric quantities Hp(0.07), Hp(3) and Hp(10), respectively. It was obtained that lead aprons reduced dose rates and whole-body doses by 71% and 69% for the physicians, respectively, and by 56% and 68% for the nurses. On average, normalised Hp(10) values of 0.65 ± 0.18 µSv/GBq were obtained with active dosimetry, which is generally consistent with passive dosemeters. For physicians, the median of the maximum normalised Hp(0.07) values was 41.5 µSv/GBq on the non-dominant hand and 45.2 µSv/GBq on the dominant hand. For nurses 15.4 µSv/GBq on the non-dominant and 13.9 µSv/GBq on the dominant hand. The ratio or correction factor between the maximum dose measured on the hand and the dose measured on the base of the middle/ring finger of the non-dominant hand resulted in a factor of 5/6 for the physicians and 3/4 for the nurses. Finally, maximum normalised Hp(3) doses resulted in 2.02 µSv/GBq for physicians and 1.76 µSv/GBq for nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

If appropriate safety measures are taken, the administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a safe procedure for workers. However, regular monitoring is recommended to ensure that the annual dose limits are not exceeded.

Replacing Lu-177 with Tb-161 in DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617 therapy: potential dosimetric implications for activity selection

AIM

To explore the dosimetric effect of substituting Lu-177 with Tb-161 in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) using the registered tracers DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617.

METHODS

Using established kinetic data for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, radiation absorbed doses to typical tumour lesion as well as non-target tissues ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: kidneys, spleen and liver, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: kidneys, liver and salivary glands) were calculated for Lu-177 and Tb-161.

RESULTS

For both DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617, the substitution of Lu-177 with Tb-161 results in an increase in the delivered dose per unit of activity to tumour tissue by 40%. If an equivalent non-target delivered dose is strived for in order not to increase toxicity, based on kidney absorbed dose, 7400 MBq Lu-177 per cycle should be substituted with 5400 MBq Tb-161 for DOTA-TATE and 5300 MBq of Tb-161 for PSMA-617.

CONCLUSION

When substituting Lu-177 with Tb-161, activity conversion is necessary in order not to exceed non-target dose limits.

Efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in 15 patients with progressive treatment-refractory meningioma

PURPOSE

There is no evidence-based systemic therapy for patients with progressive meningiomas for whom surgery or external radiotherapy is no longer an option. In this study, the efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with progressive, treatment-refractory meningiomas were evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all meningioma patients treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE from 2000 to 2020 in our centre. Primary outcomes were response according to RANO bidimensional and volumetric criteria and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) and tumour growth rate (TGR) were secondary endpoints. TGR was calculated as the percentage change in surface or volume per month.

RESULTS

Fifteen meningioma patients received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (7.5-29.6 GBq). Prior to PRRT, all patients had received external radiotherapy, and 14 patients had undergone surgery. All WHO grades were included WHO 1 (n=3), WHO 2 (n=5), and WHO 3 (n=6). After PRRT, stable disease was observed in six (40%) patients. The median PFS was 7.8 months with a 6-month PFS rate of 60%. The median OS was 13.6 months with a 12-month OS rate of 60%. All patients had progressive disease prior to PRRT, with an average TGR of 4.6% increase in surface and 14.8% increase in volume per month. After PRRT, TGR declined to 3.1% in surface (p=0.016) and 5.0% in volume (p=0.013) per month.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of meningioma patients with exhaustion of surgical and radiotherapeutic options and progressive disease, it was shown that PRRT plays a role in controlling tumour growth.

Correlations between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC Uptake and Absorbed Dose from [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper was to investigate correlations between pre- therapeutic [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake and absorbed dose to tumours from therapy with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 301 tumours from 54 GEP-NET patients. The tumours were segmented on pre-therapeutic [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, and post-therapy [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT images, using a fixed 40% threshold. The SPECT/CT images were used for absorbed dose calculations by assuming a linear build-up from time zero to day one, and mono-exponential wash-out after that. Both SUV_mean and SUV_max were measured from the PET images. A linear absorbed-dose prediction model was formed with SUV_mean as the independent variable, and the accuracy was tested with a split 70-30 training-test set.

RESULTS

Mean SUV_mean and SUV_max from [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET was 24.0 (3.6-84.4) and 41.0 (6.7-146.5), and the mean absorbed dose from [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was 26.9 Gy (2.4-101.9). A linear relationship between SUV_mean and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE activity concentration at 24 h post injection was found (R² = 0.44, p < 0.05). In the prediction model, a root mean squared error and a mean absolute error of 1.77 and 1.33 Gy/GBq, respectively, were found for the test set.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high inter- and intra-patient variability in tumour measurements, both for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC SUVs and absorbed doses from [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Depending on the required accuracy, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET imaging may estimate the [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE uptake. However, there could be a high variance between predicted and actual absorbed doses.

Combination of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE Targeted Radionuclide Therapy and Photothermal Therapy as a Promising Approach for Cancer Treatment: In Vivo Studies in a Human Xenograft Mouse Model

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) relies on α- and β-emitting radionuclides bound to a peptide that commonly targets somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) for the localized killing of tumors through ionizing radiation. A Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu)-based probe linked to the somatostatin analog octreotate ([¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) is approved for the treatment of certain SSTR-expressing tumors and has been shown to improve survival. However, a limiting factor of PRRT is the potential toxicity derived from the high doses needed to kill the tumor. This could be circumvented by combining PRRT with other treatments for an enhanced anti-tumor effect. Photothermal therapy (PTT) relies on nanoparticle-induced hyperthermia for cancer treatment and could be a useful add-on to PRRT. Here, we investigate a strategy combining [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT and nanoshell (NS)-based PTT for the treatment of SSTR-expressing small-cell lung tumors in mice. Our results showed that the combination treatment improved survival compared to PRRT alone, but only when PTT was performed one day after [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE injection (one of the timepoints examined), showcasing the effect of treatment timing in relation to outcome. Furthermore, the combination treatment was well-tolerated in the mice. This indicates that strategies involving NS-based PTT as an add-on to PRRT could be promising and should be investigated further.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Patients with Advanced GEP NENS: Present and Future Directions

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms have been usually described as infrequent tumors, but their incidence has been rising over time. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (PRRT-Lu) was approved by the European Medicines Agency and by the Food and Drug Administration as the first radiopharmaceutical for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in progressive gastroenteropancreatic NET. PRRT-Lu is considered a therapeutic option in progressive SSTR-positive NETs with homogenous SSTR expression. The NETTER-1 study demonstrated that PRRT-Lu yielded a statistically and clinically significant improvement in PFS as a primary endpoint (HR: 0.18, p < 0.0001), as well as a clinical trend towards improvement in OS. These results made scientific societies incorporate PRRT-Lu into their clinical guidelines; however, some questions still remain unanswered.

Abstract

This review article summarizes findings published in the last years on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in GEP NENs, as well as potential future developments and directions. Unanswered questions remain, such as the following: Which is the correct dose and individual dosimetry? Which is the place for salvage PRRT-Lu? Whicht is the role of PRRT-Lu in the pediatric population? Which is the optimal sequencing of PRRT-Lu in advanced GEP NETs? Which is the place of PRRT-Lu in G3 NENs? These, and future developments such as inclusion new radiopharmaceuticals and combination therapy with different agents, such as radiosensitizers, will be discussed.

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [131I]MIBG Phenotypic Imaging-Based Therapy in Metastatic/Inoperable Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: Comparative Results in a Single Center

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to assess phenotypic imaging patterns and the response to treatment with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and/or [¹³¹I]MIBG in paragangliomas (PGLs) and pheochromocytomas (PHEOs), globally and according to the primary location.

METHODS

This is a 17-patient retrospective observational study, with 9 cases treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and 8 with [¹³¹I]MIBG (37 total treatments). Functional imaging scans and treatment responses were studied in order to choose the best therapeutic option and to define the progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) according to treatment modality and primary location.

RESULTS

All patients were studied with phenotypic nuclear medicine images. Twelve of 17 patients were tested with both [¹²³I]MIBG and somatostatin receptor images, and 6/12 showed appropriate expression of both targets to treatment in the phenotypic images. The rest of the patients were tested with one of the image modalities or only showed suitable uptake of a single radiotracer and were treated with the corresponding therapeutic option. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PFS was 29 months with a DCR of 88.8%. [¹³¹I]MIBG PFS was 18.5 months with a 62.5% DCR. According to the primary location, the best PFS was in PHEOs treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Although the series are small due to the low disease prevalence and do not allow to yield statistically significant differences, this first study comparing [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [¹³¹I]MIBG displays a trend to an overall longer PFS with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, especially in the adrenal primary location. When both radionuclide targets are expressed, the patients' comorbidity and treatment effectiveness should be valued together with the intensity uptake in the phenotypic image in order to choose the best therapeutic option. These preliminary retrospective results reinforce the need for a prospective, multicentric trial to be confirmed.

Use of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study

Aim

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus relevant comparators for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NETs) and the pancreas (P-NETs).

Materials and methods

A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus standard of care (high dose Octreotide LAR), everolimus and sunitinib. Effectiveness data for SoC, everolimus and sunitinib were obtained from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Given a lack of head-to-head effectiveness data, matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were performed to population-adjust [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE survival data based on prognostic factors and derive estimates of relative effectiveness. Health state utilities were estimated from real-world evidence. Drug acquisition costs were taken from nationally published sources (BNF, NICE), and administration costs were based on treatment protocols in [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE studies, combined with nationally published unit costs (PSSRU, DoH reference costs). Incidence of adverse events were estimated using published sources. A discount rate of 3.5% was applied to both utilities and costs, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Costs were included from an NHS perspective and presented in 2017/18 GBP (and PPP Euros for base case).

Results

In GI-NETs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC and everolimus was £26,528 (€27,672) and £24,145 (€25,186) per QALY, respectively. In P-NETs, the ICER of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC was £22,146 (€23,101) or £28,038 (€29,251) dependent on matched population, and £21,827 (€22,766) and £15,768 (€16,445) compared to everolimus and sunitinib, respectively.

Conclusions

At a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for GI-NET and P-NET patients versus relevant treatment comparators (NHS perspective).

•

A three-state partitioned survival model of GEP-NET patients was developed.

•

Base case ICERs for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE were under £30,000 per QALY for all comparators.

•

[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is cost-effective for the treatment of GEP-NETs from a NICE perspective.

Estimation of Absorbed Doses of Indigenously Produced "Direct-route" Lutetium-177-Labeled DOTA-TATE PRRT in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions in Patients of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with No-Carrier-Added [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and the Trend with Multiple Cycles

Background: Lutetium-177-labeled somatostatin analogue, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is most commonly used across the world for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The primary objective of this study was to estimate the absorbed doses in organs and tumor lesions in NET patients treated with indigenously produced "direct-route" [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-labeled DOTA-TATE and impact of multiple treatment cycles on absorbed doses, and compare with those treated with no-carrier-added [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-labeled DOTA-TATE. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of NET were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients received up to 6 cycles of PRRT with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (total 232 cycles) at 10- to 12-week intervals between the two successive therapy cycles. The patients were administered 5.55-7.4 GBq (150-200 mCi) of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in 100 mL of normal saline over a period of 30 min. Postadministration whole-body planar scintigraphy were acquired at five time points 0.5 (prevoid), 2, 12, 24, and 72 h (postvoid) and one SPECT scan at 24 h (postvoid). Number of disintegrations was determined from time-activity curves generated by drawing regions of interests (ROIs) on the images. Tumor masses were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. The absorbed doses for normal organs and tumor lesions were calculated using OLINDA 2.1.1 software. The same were also estimated in a group of 22 patients who were treated with no-carrier-added [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-labeled DOTA-TATE. Results: The mean absorbed organ doses (mean ± SD) in Gy/GBq received by normal organs were as follows: kidneys 0.64 ± 0.21, liver 0.10 ± 0.05, spleen 0.88 ± 0.35, bone marrow 0.04 ± 0.02, urinary bladder 0.26 ± 0.06, heart wall 0.04 ± 0.02, and whole-body 0.06 ± 0.02. Tumor dosimetry was performed in a total of 410 tumor lesions, the mean absorbed dose to the tumor lesions was 4.79 ± 4.23 Gy/GBq. Large variations were observed in absorbed doses received by these lesions (range: 0.15-21.26 Gy/GBq). With no-carrier-added [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, the mean absorbed organ doses (mean ± SD) in Gy/GBq received by normal organs were as follows: kidneys 0.76 ± 0.16, liver 0.10 ± 0.05, spleen 1.14 ± 0.31, bone marrow 0.05 ± 0.02, urinary bladder 0.27 ± 0.05, heart wall 0.06 ± 0.02, whole-body 0.07 ± 0.02, and tumor dose 5.87 ± 5.74. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the dosimetry data of patients treated with no-carrier-added (indirect route) [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-labeled DOTA-TATE and the dosimetry data of patients treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-labeled with DOTA-TATE formulated using ¹⁷⁷Lu produced through "Direct-route" and were comparable with the data reported.

Distinct In Vitro Binding Profile of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Antagonist [177Lu]Lu-OPS201 Compared to the Agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours with the radiolabelled somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST₂) peptide agonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is effective and well-established. Recent studies suggest improved therapeutic efficacy using the SST₂ peptide antagonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms that lead to the observed differences. In the present in vitro study, we compared kinetic binding, saturation binding, competition binding, cellular uptake and release of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 versus [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE using HEK cells stably transfected with the human SST₂. While [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE exhibited comparable affinity (K_D, 0.15 ± 0.003 and 0.08 ± 0.02 nM, respectively), [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 recognized four times more binding sites than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Competition assays demonstrated that a high concentration of the agonist displaced only 30% of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 bound to HEK-SST₂ cell membranes; an indication that the antagonist binds to additional sites that are not recognized by the agonist. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 showed faster association and slower dissociation than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Whereas most of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 remained at the cell surface, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was almost completely internalised inside the cell. The present data identified distinct differences between [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE regarding the recognition of receptor binding sites (higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) and their kinetics (faster association and slower dissociation of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) that explain, to a great extent, the improved therapeutic efficacy of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

Clinical implementation of PLANET® Dose for dosimetric assessment after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: comparison with Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0

Background

The aim of this study was to compare a commercial dosimetry workstation (PLANET® Dose) and the dosimetry approach (GE Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0) currently used in our department for quantification of the absorbed dose (AD) to organs at risk after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

Methods

An evaluation on phantom was performed to determine the SPECT calibration factor variations over time and to compare the Time Integrated Activity Coefficients (TIACs) obtained with the two approaches. Then, dosimetry was carried out with the two tools in 21 patients with neuroendocrine tumours after the first and second injection of 7.2 ± 0.2 GBq of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (40 dosimetry analyses with each software). SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h and 192 h post-injection and were reconstructed using the Xeleris software (General Electric). The liver, spleen and kidneys masses and TIACs were determined using Dosimetry Toolkit® (DTK) and PLANET® Dose. The ADs were calculated using OLINDA/EXM® V1.0 and the Local Deposition Method (LDM) or Dose voxel-Kernel convolution (DK) on PLANET® Dose.

Results

With the phantom, the 3D calibration factors showed a slight variation (0.8% and 3.3%) over time, and TIACs of 225.19 h and 217.52 h were obtained with DTK and PLANET® Dose, respectively. In patients, the root mean square deviation value was 8.9% for the organ masses, 8.1% for the TIACs, and 9.1% and 7.8% for the ADs calculated with LDM and DK, respectively. The Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was 0.99 and the Bland–Altman plot analysis estimated that the AD value difference between methods ranged from − 0.75 to 0.49 Gy, from − 0.20 to 0.64 Gy, and from − 0.43 to 1.03 Gy for 95% of the 40 liver, kidneys and spleen dosimetry analyses. The dosimetry method had a minor influence on AD differences compared with the image registration and organ segmentation steps.

Conclusions

The ADs to organs at risk obtained with the new workstation PLANET® Dose are concordant with those calculated with the currently used software and in agreement with the literature. These results validate the use of PLANET® Dose in clinical routine for patient dosimetry after targeted radiotherapy with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

Toxicity of a combined therapy using the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus and PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Lewis rats

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA0,TYR3-octreotate ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) and the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus are both approved for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, tumour progression is still frequent, and treatment strategies need further improvement. One possible approach could be to combine different therapy options. In this study, we investigated the toxicity of a combined treatment with everolimus and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in female Lewis rats.

METHODS

Animals received 200 MBq of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE once and/or 5 mg/kg body weight everolimus or placebo weekly for 16 weeks and were divided into four groups (group 1, placebo; group 2, everolimus; group 3, placebo + [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE; group 4, everolimus + [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE). Blood levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were assessed weekly to monitor nephrotoxicity, and a full blood count was performed at the time of euthanasia to monitor myelotoxicity. Additionally, renal function was analysed by sequential [99mTc]Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ([99mTc]Tc-MAG3) scintigraphies. Histopathological examination was performed in all the kidneys using a standardized renal damage score (RDS).

RESULTS

Rats receiving everolimus showed a significantly lower increase in creatinine levels than those receiving placebo. Everolimus therapy reduced white blood count significantly, which was not observed for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Functional renal scintigraphies using [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 showed a compromised initial tracer uptake after PRRT and slower but still preserved excretion after everolimus. Histology showed no significant RDS differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Renal scintigraphy is a highly sensitive tool for the detection of renal function impairment after a combination of everolimus and PRRT. Additional treatment with everolimus does not increase renal and haematological toxicity of PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.