Spatial profiling reveals tissue-specific neuro-immune interactions in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous malignancies that arise from complex cellular interactions within the tissue microenvironment. Here, we sought to decipher tumor-derived signals from the surrounding microenvironment by applying digital spatial profiling (DSP) to hormone-secreting and non-functional GEP-NETs. By combining this approach with in vitro studies of human-derived organoids, we demonstrated the convergence of cell autonomous immune and pro-inflammatory proteins that suggests their role in neuroendocrine differentiation and tumorigenesis. DSP was used to evaluate the expression of 40 neural- and immune-related proteins in surgically resected duodenal and pancreatic NETs (n = 20) primarily consisting of gastrinomas (18/20). A total of 279 regions of interest were examined between tumors, adjacent normal and abnormal-appearing epithelium, and the surrounding stroma. The results were stratified by tissue type and multiple endocrine neoplasia I (MEN1) status, whereas protein expression was validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). A tumor immune cell autonomous inflammatory signature was further evaluated by IHC and RNAscope, while functional pro-inflammatory signaling was confirmed using patient-derived duodenal organoids. Gastrin-secreting and non-functional pancreatic NETs showed a higher abundance of immune cell markers and immune infiltrate compared with duodenal gastrinomas. Compared with non-MEN1 tumors, MEN1 gastrinomas and preneoplastic lesions showed strong immune exclusion and upregulated expression of neuropathological proteins. Despite a paucity of immune cells, duodenal gastrinomas expressed the pro-inflammatory and pro-neural factor IL-17B. Treatment of human duodenal organoids with IL-17B activated NF-κB and STAT3 signaling and induced the expression of neuroendocrine markers. In conclusion, multiplexed spatial protein analysis identified tissue-specific neuro-immune signatures in GEP-NETs. Duodenal gastrinomas are characterized by an immunologically cold microenvironment that permits cellular reprogramming and neoplastic transformation of the preneoplastic epithelium. Moreover, duodenal gastrinomas cell autonomously express immune and pro-inflammatory factors, including tumor-derived IL-17B, that stimulate the neuroendocrine phenotype. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTATATE: Nursing Roles in Managing Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a diverse family of cancers that occur within the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) via 177Lu-DOTATATE is a newer therapeutic option for certain patients with somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs.

OBJECTIVES

This review informs on how oncology nurses treating patients with GEP-NETs receiving PRRT using 177Lu-DOTATATE can facilitate care.

METHODS

Guidance on the monitoring, management, and care of patients undergoing PRRT for GEP-NETs was developed based on published literature and the nursing experience of the authors. A case study is summarized to highlight key concepts.

FINDINGS

Oncology nurses provide assessment, education, direct care, and emotional support when caring for patients with GEP-NETs receiving PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. As the treatment landscape evolves, so too will these roles and responsibilities.

Defining Tumor Microenvironment as a Possible Target for Effective GEP-NENs Immunotherapy-A Systematic Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous and recurrent group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine secretory cells diffused on all parts of the human body. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for most NENs. Considering the abundance of possible origins, locations, and tumor specifications, there is still no consensus about optimal treatment options for these neoplasms. In light of the escalating immunotherapeutic approaches, it is crucial to define indications for such therapy in GEP-NETs. Bearing in mind the significance of pathophysiological mechanisms and tumor microenvironment (TME) impact on carcinogenesis, defining TME structure and correlation with the immune system in GEP-NETs appears essential. This paper aimed to assess the characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment for a better understanding of the possible therapeutic options in GEP-NETS. The authors performed a systematic review, extracting papers from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Among 3800 articles identified through database searching, 292 were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 28 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. This paper sums up the research on the immune cell infiltrates, immune checkpoint expression, cytokine profile, neoangiogenesis, and microbiome in the TME of GEP-NETs.

Prognostic predictors for recurrence following curative resection in grade I/II pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) have an excellent long-term survival after resection, but are associated with a high recurrence rate. Identification of prognostic factors affecting recurrences would enable identifying subgroup of patients at higher risk of recurrences, who may benefit from more aggressive treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with curative intent for grade I and II pNETs between July 2007 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 68 resected patients of pNETs were included in this analysis. Fifty-two patients (76.47%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 (14.7%) patients had distal pancreatectomy, and 2 (2.9%) patients underwent median pancreatectomy, while enucleation was performed in 4 patients (5.8%). The overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) and mortality rates were 33.82% and 2.94%, respectively. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, 22 (32.35%) patients had disease recurrence. The 5-year overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 90.2% and 60.8%, respectively. While OS was unaffected by different prognostic factors, multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement, Ki-67 index ≥5%, and presence of perineural invasion (PNI) were independently associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

While surgical resection gives excellent overall survival in grade I/II pNETs, lymph node positivity, higher Ki-67 index, and PNI are associated with a high risk for recurrence. Patients with these characteristics should be stratified as high risk and evaluated for more intensive follow-up and aggressive treatment strategies in future prospective studies.

Gastro-Enteric-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Treatment: Actinium-225-DOTATATE and Combined Therapies

The role of lutetium-177-DOTATATE in advanced well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is well established. However, there is a scope for improving treatment outcomes. Actinium-225-DOTATATE is a form of targeted alpha therapy (TAT) that results in more efficient tumor cell killing owing to the substantially higher linear energy transfer of alpha particles. Systemic TAT is also safe given that the shorter path length of the alpha particles spares the surrounding healthy tissue and results in relatively fewer adverse events. Combination therapies with radiosensitizing and other chemotherapeutic agents have also gained popularity, especially in the setting of higher grade and fluorodeoxyglucose-avid tumors.

Gastro-Enteric-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Treatment: 177Lu-DOTATATE

177Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy is a highly effective therapy in metastatic, well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with mostly tolerable adverse effects. Guidelines generally refer to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a second-line therapy after SSA in gastroenteric and second- or third-line therapy in pancreatic NETs to improve survival rates and quality of life. Although we do not have sufficient data, 177Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy may also have a role in high-grade NET therapy, mostly in combination with other treatments such as chemotherapy.

Lanreotide Depot to Treat Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in a US Community Oncology Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) can result in symptoms such as diarrhea, flushing, abdominal pain, and fatigue and are often associated with a significant disease burden and poor prognosis. This non-interventional, prospective, observational study evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of lanreotide depot, a somatostatin analog (SSA) used to treat GEP-NETs, in a community setting.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-interventional study (NCT02730104), adult patients with locally advanced (inoperable), metastatic GEP-NETs treated with lanreotide depot were evaluated by their physician every 6 months from enrollment for 24 months. Clinically defined time to disease progression (TTDP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for the total population and by primary tumor type (gastrointestinal [GI], pancreatic, unknown origin), and an exploratory analysis determined the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months. Patient satisfaction was evaluated via the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and safety information was recorded.

RESULTS

Of 99 patients, the 24-month PFS rate was 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.1-81.7) and 24-month OS rate was 84.2% (95% CI 74.0-90.7). Median TTDP was not reached because few patients experienced disease progression during the study period. The majority of responding patients expressed satisfaction with treatment on each domain of the TSQM-9. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 19.2% of patients, while no serious AEs (SAEs) were related to the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide depot is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for GEP-NETs in the real-world community setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02730104.

Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients receiving Concomitant 225Ac-DOTATATE Targeted Alpha Therapy and Capecitabine: A Real-world Scenario Management Based Long-term Outcome Study

Rationale: Although the short-term results of targeted alpha therapy (TAT) with 225Ac-DOTATATE in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have proven effective, none have assessed the long-term outcome results. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of 225Ac-DOTATATE targeted alpha therapy (TAT) in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing advanced-stage metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Methods: Patients with 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans showing moderate-to-high SSTR expression were recruited. Systemic TAT was performed in 91 adults with GEP-NET [54 males, and 37 females] mean age 54 years (y) (range: 25-75y)] using 225Ac-DOTATATE (100-120 kBq/kg body weight). All patients were given capecitabine therapy as a radiosensitizer (dose 2 g/day) from day 0 to 14 of every 225Ac-DOTATATE treatment cycle. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the status of prior 177Lu-PRRT: prior 177Lu-PRRT-refractory-group; prior 177Lu-PRRT-disease-control group; and 177Lu-PRRT naïve group. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective tumour response, clinical response, and the assessment of treatment-related toxicities. Results: Among the 91 patients, 57 underwent prior 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy [24 disease controlled (PR/SD), 33 progressive diseases (PD)]. A total of 453 225Ac-DOTATATE TAT cycles were administered [median four cycles per patient; range 1-10] in a median follow-up duration of 24 months (range 5-41mo). Median OS was not attained with a 24-month overall survival probability of 70.8%. In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors associated with a poor OS included, the presence bone metastases [HR: 2.501; 95% CI: 1.826 - 5.791; P<0.032], and 225Ac-DOTATATE therapy refractory disease [HR: 8.781; 95% CI: 3.843 - 20.062; P<0.0001]. Median PFS was also not reached with a 24-month progression-free survival probability of 67.5%. The multivariate analysis revealed only 177Lu-PRRT refractory disease significantly associated with a reduced PFS. [HR: 14.338; 95% CI: 1.853 - 97.698; P = 0.011]. Two of 79 patients (2.5%) with assessable disease experienced complete response; 38 (48%) had a partial response, 23 (29%) had SD, and 16 (20.2%) had PD. PD was observed in more patients from the prior 177Lu-PRRT-refractory group (11/33; 34%) as compared to 177Lu-PRRT-naïve patients (4/24; 11%), P-0.056. Patients from the prior 177Lu-PRRT-refractory group had the highest risk of poor PFS [HR:13.91; 95% CI: 4.45 - 42.271; P = 0.0009]. A significant clinical benefit was achieved post 225Ac-DOTATATE therapy with minimal treatment-related toxicities. Conclusion: The long-term results reveal 225Ac-DOTATATE TAT has shown promising results and improves overall survival, even in patients refractory to prior 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment, with transient and acceptable adverse effects.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are an increasingly common cause of neoplastic diseases. One of the largest groups of NENs are neoplasms localized to the gastroenteropancreatic system, which are known as gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs). Because of nonspecific clinical symptoms, GEP-NEN patient diagnosis and, consequently, their treatment, might be difficult and delayed. This situation has forced researchers all over the world to continue progress in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GEP-NENs. Our review is designed to present the latest reports on the laboratory diagnostic techniques, imaging tests and surgical and nonsurgical treatment strategies used for patients with these rare neoplasms. We paid particular attention to the nuclear approach, the use of which has been applied to GEP-NEN patient diagnosis, and to nonsurgical and radionuclide treatment strategies. Recent publications were reviewed in search of reports on new strategies for effective disease management. Attention was also paid to those studies still in progress, but with successful results. A total of 248 papers were analyzed, from which 141 papers most relevant to the aim of the study were selected. Using these papers, we highlight the progress in the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with GEP-NENs.

Patterns of Use and Clinical Outcomes with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Nationwide French Retrospective Cohort Study in the Real-Life Setting

Introduction

Long-acting somatostatin analogues such as lanreotide autogel (LAN) and octreotide long-acting release (OCT) are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, only few real-world studies have compared the two medications. This retrospective, observational cohort study used a French claims database to compare patterns of use with LAN vs. OCT in patients with NETs.

Methods

Data on LAN and OCT patterns of use were obtained retrospectively from the National System of Health Data (SNDS), a national French claims database. Patients 18 years of age or older who initiated treatment for NETs between 2009 and 2016, and who received at least six subsequent dispensings of first-line LAN or OCT during the first year of treatment, were included. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs.

Results

Patients receiving LAN (n = 2327) vs. OCT (n = 2090) had greater median treatment duration (31.8 months vs. 22.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001; log-rank test) and were less likely to discontinue treatment; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.80). In year 1, a significantly lower percentage of patients receiving LAN vs. OCT switched treatments (10.4% vs. 22.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001), received an average monthly dose per trimester above recommended dose (3.0% vs. 7.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001), and used rescue medication (3.1% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Dispensing of pancreatic enzymes was significantly higher in patients receiving LAN than OCT (16.4% vs. 13.9%, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with GEP-NETs, those receiving LAN (n = 1478) vs. OCT (n = 1278) had greater treatment duration and less treatment discontinuation, switching, dosage above the recommended dose, and rescue medication use, but no significant difference in dispensing of pancreatic enzymes or time to second-line treatment.

Conclusion

These real-world data suggest potential clinical and economic advantages of LAN over OCT in the management of patients with NETs in the French population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02060-1.

Immunotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a 2021 update

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous malignancies, arising from the neuroendocrine system. These neoplasms are divided into two distinct groups, the low-proliferating, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and the highly-proliferating, poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Recent data demonstrate that the incidence of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms, GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs, has increased exponentially over the last three decades. Although surgical resection is considered the best treatment modality, patients with GEP-NETs often present with advanced disease at diagnosis associated with a 5-year survival rate of 57% for well-differentiated tumors, and only 5.2% for small-cell tumors. Immunotherapy is a novel treatment approach, which has demonstrated effective and promising therapeutic results against several types of cancers. In the present study, we review the current ongoing clinical trials and to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in GEP-NENs. Furthermore, we analyze the importance of tumor genetic profiling and its clinical implications in immunotherapy response.

Overcoming nephrotoxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastasized somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR₂)-expressing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). The radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE delivers its radiation dose to SSTR₂-overexpressing tumour cells, resulting in selective cell killing during radioactive decay. While tumour control can be achieved in many patients, complete remissions remain rare, causing the majority of patients to relapse after a certain period of time. This raises the question whether the currently fixed treatment regime (4 × 7.4 GBq) leaves room for dose escalation as a means of improving therapy efficacy. The kidneys have shown to play an important role in defining a patient's tolerability to PRRT. As a consequence of the proximal tubular reabsorption of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, via the endocytic megalin/cubilin receptor complex, the radionuclides are retained in the renal interstitium. This results in extended retention of radioactivity in the kidneys, generating a risk for the development of radiation nephropathy. In addition, a decreased kidney function has shown to be associated with a prolonged circulation of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, causing increased irradiation to the bone marrow. This can on its turn lead to myelosuppression and haematological toxicity, owing to the marked radio sensitivity of the rapidly proliferating cells in the bone marrow. In contrast to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), the exact absorbed dose limits for these critical organs (kidneys and bone marrow) in PRRT with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE are still unclear. Better insights into these uncertainties, can help in optimizing PRRT to reach its maximum therapeutic potential, while avoiding severe adverse events, like nephropathy and hematologic toxicities. In this review we focus on the nephrotoxic effects of PRRT with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of GEP-NETs. If the absorbed dose to the kidneys can be lowered, higher activities can be administered, enlarging the therapeutic window for PRRT. Therefore, we evaluated the renal protective potential of current and promising future strategies and discuss the importance of (renal) dosimetry in PRRT.

Development and Validation of Novel Nomograms Using Serum Tumor Markers for the Prediction of Preoperative Histologic Grades in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background

To develop and validate nomogram models for the preoperatively prediction of the histologic grade of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) to provide appropriate treatments.

Methods

A total of 1014 participants, including 211 healthy controls, 293 patients with benign diseases, 299 patients with cancers, and 211 patients with GEP-NETs were included in the final analysis. Their sociodemographic and laboratory information, including serum tumor markers such as AFP, CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, Cyfra21-1 and NSE were collected. Nomogram models were developed to preoperatively predict histologic grades of GEP-NETs.

Results

Among six serum tumor markers, only NSE was found to have a statistically significant association with the histologic grades in GEP-NETs (G1 vs. G2: p < 0.05; G2 vs. G3: p < 0.001; G1 vs. G3: p < 0.0001), which was combined with sex and age to develop the nomogram models. The first nomogram (to differentiate grade 1(G1) and grade 2/3 tumor (G2/G3)) showed a strong association to differentiate with an AUC of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.663-0.832) and 0.735 (95% CI: 0.624-0.847) in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The second nomogram (to differentiate G1/G2 and G3 tumors) showed a strong association to differentiate with an AUC of 0.827 (95% CI: 0.744-0.911) and 0.847 (95% CI: 0.744-0.950) in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The ROC, area under ROC curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the clinical usefulness of both models.

Conclusions

We proposed two novel nomogram models based on sex, age and serum NSE levels to preoperatively predict the histologic grades in GEP-NETs to assist the clinical decision-making.

Combined use of 177Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine (Lu-X) in FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

FDG-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a poorer prognosis and exhibit shorter response duration to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The aim of this prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE associated with metronomic capecitabine as a radiosensitizer agent in patients with advanced progressive FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced somatostatin receptor- and FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs (Ki67 < 55%) were treated with a cumulative activity of 27.5 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE divided in five cycles of 5.5 GBq each every 8 weeks. Capecitabine (1000-1500 mg daily) was administered orally in the inter-cycle period between ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatments. Prior to commencing capecitabine, all patients were triaged with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) test. Only DPD-proficient individuals were enrolled. The primary objectives were disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Secondary aims included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment response was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Toxicity was assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

RESULTS

From August 2015 to December 2016, 37 subjects were consecutively enrolled. A total of 25 (68%) were affected by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs), and 12 (32%) had gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). By grading (WHO 2010 classification), 12 patients (32%) had G1 (Ki67 ≤ 2%), 22 (59%) had G2 (3% < Ki67 ≤ 20%), and 3 patients (9%) had G3 (Ki67 > 20%) NETs. Grade 3 (G3) or 4 (G4) hematological toxicity occurred in 16.2% of patients. Other G3-G4 adverse events were diarrhea in 5.4% of cases and asthenia in 5.4%. No renal toxicity was observed for the duration of follow-up. In 37 patients, 33 were evaluable for response. Objective responses included partial response (PR) in 10 patients (30%) and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (55%), with a DCR of 85%. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 4.6-51.1 months). The median PFS was 31.4 months (17.6-45.4), and mOS was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the combination of PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs. These data constitute the basis for a randomized study of PPRT alone vs. PRRT plus metronomic capecitabine.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: The Potential Role of microRNAs in the Management of the Syndrome

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare inherited tumor syndrome, characterized by the development of multiple neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in a single patient. Major manifestations include primary hyperparathyroidism, gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and pituitary adenomas. In addition to these main NETs, various combinations of more than 20 endocrine and non-endocrine tumors have been described in MEN1 patients. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques and treatment options, which are generally similar to those of sporadic tumors, patients with MEN1 have a poor life expectancy, and the need for targeted therapies is strongly felt. MEN1 is caused by germline heterozygous inactivating mutations of the MEN1 gene, which encodes menin, a tumor suppressor protein. The lack of a direct genotype–phenotype correlation does not permit the determination of the exact clinical course of the syndrome. One of the possible causes of this lack of association could be ascribed to epigenetic factors, including microRNAs (miRNAs), single-stranded non-coding small RNAs that negatively regulate post-transcriptional gene expression. Some miRNAs, and their deregulation, have been associated with MEN1 tumorigenesis. Recently, an extracellular class of miRNAs has also been identified (c-miRNAs); variations in their levels showed association with various human diseases, including tumors. The aim of this review is to provide a general overview on the involvement of miRNAs in MEN1 tumor development, to be used as possible targets for novel molecular therapies. The potential role of c-miRNAs as future non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of MEN1 will be discussed as well.

mTOR Pathway in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (GEP-NETs)

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) originate from neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract. They are heterogeneous, and though initially considered rare tumors, the incidence of GEP-NENs has increased in the last few decades. Therapeutic approaches for the metastatic disease include surgery, radiological intervention by chemoembolisation, radiofrequency ablation, biological therapy in addition to somatostatin analogs, and PRRT therapy (177Lu-DOTATATE). The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is essential in the regulation of protein translation, cell growth, and metabolism. Evidence suggests that the mTOR pathway is involved in malignant progression and resistance to treatment through over-activation of several mechanisms. PI3K, one of the main downstream of the Akt-mTOR axis, is mainly involved in the neoplastic process. This pathway is frequently deregulated in human tumors, making it a central target in the development of new anti-cancer treatments. Recent molecular studies identify potential targets within the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in GEP-NENs. However, the use of target therapy has been known to lead to resistance due to several mechanisms such as feedback activation of alternative pathways, inactivation of protein kinases, and deregulation of the downstream mTOR components. Therefore, the specific role of targeted drugs for the management of GEP-NENs is yet to be well-defined. The variable clinical presentation of advanced neuroendocrine tumors is a significant challenge for designing studies. This review aims to highlight the role of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in the development of neuroendocrine tumors and further specify its potential as a therapeutic target in advanced stages.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Iceland: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, distribution, and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) over the last 30 years and analyze changes over time.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs in Iceland from 1985 to 2014 were identified through the Icelandic Cancer Registry and pathology laboratory records. Relevant clinical information was obtained from medical records. In order to assess trends, the study period was divided into two periods, 1985-1999 and 2000-2014.

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients with GEP-NETs were identified. Overall, 18 patients diagnosed at autopsy or with primary tumors of an unknown site were excluded, leaving 346 patients with 351 primary tumors for final analysis. The overall mean annual incidence 1985-2014 was 3.65/100,000, 3.39/100,000 during 1985-1999 and 3.85/100,000 during 2000-2014 (p = NS). The most common primary tumor site was the appendix (32%), followed by the jejunum/ileum (24%) and stomach (17%). In all, 18% of patients presented with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, most noticeably patients with primary tumors of the colon (47%), pancreas (46%) and jejunum/ileum (39%). The most favorable 5-year survival was observed for tumors of the appendix (94%) and rectum (88%) and the least favorable for tumors of the pancreas (31%), colon (47%) and jejunum/ileum (66%). There were no statistically significant changes in incidence, staging or survival between the two time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, the incidence of GEP-NETs has not changed significantly over the last decades. The incidence of metastatic disease has remained stable and overall prognosis has not improved in recent years.

A novel germline mutation at exon 10 of MEN1 gene: a clinical survey and positive genotype-phenotype analysis of a MEN1 Italian family, including monozygotic twins

CONTEXT

Clinical phenotype variability in MEN1 syndrome exists and evidence for an established genotype-phenotype is lacking. However, a higher aggressiveness of MEN1-associated gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) (neuro)endocrine tumours (NETs) tumours has been reported when MEN1 gene truncating mutations are detected. We found a novel germline truncating mutation of MEN1 gene at exon 10 in a subject with an aggressive clinical behavior of GEP-NETs. Successively, other two mutant-affected familial members have been identified.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this observational study was to investigate genotype-phenotype correlation in these three members, with attention to GPE-NETs behavior over the years.

DESIGN

The genetic and clinical data obtained and the follow-up screening program (2012-2016) were according to the International Guidelines in a multidisciplinary academic reference center. The familial history collected strongly suggested MEN1 GEP-NETs in at least other four members from different generations.

PATIENTS

Three MEN1 patients (aged 30-69 years at MEN1 diagnosis) were clinically screened for MEN1 GEP-NETs, both functioning and nonfunctioning.

METHODS

Biochemical, imaging, and nuclear medicine tests and fine-needle agobiopsy were performed, depending on found/emerging clinical symptoms/biochemical abnormalities, and made when necessary.

RESULTS

Our clinical survey found strong genotype-phenotype correlation with aggressive MEN1 GEP-NETs (G1, G2-NETs, and multiple ZES/gastrinomas) over the years. The familial history strongly suggested ZES/gastrinoma in progenitors from previous generations.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel MEN1 truncating mutation correlates with an aggressive evolution and behavior of MEN1 GEP-NETs in studied affected subjects, confirming the need for MEN1 individuals to be evaluated by a skilled multidisciplinary team, as also stated by International Guidelines.

Clinical and functional implication of the components of somatostatin system in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies often presenting with metastasis at diagnosis and whose clinical outcome is difficult to predict. Somatostatin (SST) analogs (SSAs) provide a valuable pharmacological tool to palliate hormonal symptoms, and control progression in some NETs. However, many patients do not respond to SSAs or develop resistance, and there are many uncertainties regarding pathophysiology of SST and its receptors (sst1-sst5) in GEP-NETs.

METHODS

The expression of SST system components in GEP-NETs was determined, compared with that of non-tumor adjacent and normal tissues and correlated with clinical and histological characteristics. Specifically, 58 patients with GEP-NETs and 14 normal samples were included. Cell viability in NET cell lines was determined in response to specific SSAs.

RESULTS

Normal samples and non-tumor adjacent tissues presented a similar expression profile, with appreciable expression of sst2 and sst3, and a lower expression of the other receptors. In contrast, cortistatin, sst1, sst4, and sst5 were overexpressed in tumors, while sst3 and sst4 seemed overexpressed in less differentiated tumors. Some SST system components were related to vascular/nerve invasion and metastasis. In vitro, sst1 and sst3 agonists reduced viability in BON-1 cells, while they, similar to octreotide and pasireotide, increased viability in QGP-1 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide novel information on SST system pathophysiology in GEP-NETs, including relevant associations with clinical-histological parameters, which might help to better understand the intrinsic heterogeneity of NETs and to identify novel biomarkers and/or targets with potential prognostic and/or therapeutic value for GEP-NETs patients.

Current treatment options for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a focus on the role of lanreotide

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a large and very diverse group of neoplasms. Clinical presentation of NETs depends on the site of the primary tumor and whether the tumor is functioning (i.e., secreting peptides or neuroamines that produce symptoms). The diagnosis of GEP-NET is further complicated by symptomatic differences that occur depending on the type of secreted peptide or neuroamine. Due to their heterogeneity and unique characteristics, early diagnosis of GEP-NETs is difficult, which increases the likelihood of metastatic disease and reduces the scope of therapeutic possibilities. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of GEP-NETs is necessary. This review is the result of presentations that were delivered during an expert meeting on the treatment of GEP-NETs supported by Ipsen. We summarize the current knowledge on the epidemiology, incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of GEP-NETs. We examined the role of the somatostatin analog (SSA) lanreotide and the impact of the data from the recently published, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLARINET study (Controlled study of Lanreotide Antiproliferative Response In Neuroendocrine Tumors) on disease management. We also review the recent treatment options and recommendations for GEP-NETs.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2016;30:21-48. [PMID: 26614367 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.08.006]

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing neoplasms capable of storing and secreting different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific symptom complexes, whereas others are silent. They usually have episodic expression, and the diagnosis is often made at a late stage. Although considered rare, the incidence of NETs is increasing. For these reasons, a high index of suspicion is needed. In this article, the different clinical syndromes and the pathophysiology of each tumor as well as the new and emerging biochemical markers and imaging techniques that should be used to facilitate an early diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis are reviewed.

Mechanisms of local invasion in enteroendocrine tumors: identification of novel candidate cytoskeleton-associated proteins in an experimental mouse model by a proteomic approach and validation in human tumors

Small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are defined as locally invasive only after extension to the muscularis propria. To gain further insight into the molecular mechanisms, we applied a proteomic approach to an orthotopic xenograft model to identify candidate proteins evaluable in human SI-NETs. After grafting STC-1 neuroendocrine tumor cells on the caecum of nude mice, comparative proteomic studies were performed between the pre-invasive and the invasive stages, respectively 2 and 8 weeks after grafting. We identified 24 proteins displaying at least a 1.5-fold differential expression between 2 and 8 week-stages. Most were cytoskeleton-associated proteins, among which five showed decreasing expression levels (CRMP2, TCP1ε, TPM2, vimentin, desmin) and two increasing expression levels (14-3-3γ, CK8). Changes for CRMP2, TCP1ε, TPM2 and 14-3-3γ were confirmed in experimental tumors and in a series of 28 human SI-NETs. In conclusion, our results underline the relevance of proteomics to identify novel biomarkers of tissue invasion.

Gastric carcinoid tumors

Initially, carcinoid tumors were a curiosity for physicians and were so named because of their relatively benign behavior as compared to the more common adenocarcinomas. As medicine has evolved, our understanding and management have greatly improved. Our classification system has also become more specific. Gastric carcinoid tumors are unique in that three types have been described based upon each one's pathophysiology. In general, none of these give rise to the typical carcinoid syndrome as seen with metastatic ileal carcinoids.Type 1 gastric carcinoids represent 70% to 80% and are characterized by multiple small lesions and their association with hypergastrinemia secondary to chronic atrophic gastritis and pernicious anemia, and are less likely to metastasize. Type 2 is a rare entity, representing 5%, and is characterized by multiple small lesions, hypergastrinemia secondary to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1. The risk for metastasis is slightly higher than for type 1; however, overall prognosis is dependent upon the gastrinoma prognosis. Accounting for 20%, type 3 is known as sporadic gastric carcinoids in that there is no association with hypergastrinemia, chronic atrophic gastritis, or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. These present as large solitary lesions and are often metastatic upon diagnosis. A unique feature of type 3 is its association with an atypical carcinoid syndrome that is thought to be mediated by histamine.The treatment-including medical, endoscopic, and surgical-of gastric carcinoids is dictated by the type, size, and presence of metastasis.