Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): applications from the kidneys to the bladder

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced ultrasound (US) technique utilizing ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to provide detailed visualization of anatomic and vascular architecture, including the depiction of microcirculation. CEUS has been well-established in echocardiography and imaging of focal hepatic lesions and recent studies have also shown the utility of CEUS in non-hepatic applications like the urinary system. The updated guidelines by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) from 2018 describe the use of CEUS for non-hepatic applications. CEUS' excellent safety profile and spatial resolution make it a superior modality to conventional US and is often comparable and even superior to CECT in some instances. In comparison to other cross-sectional imaging modalities such as CECT or MRI, CEUS offers a safe (by virtue of non-nephrotoxic US contrast agents), accurate, cost-efficient, readily available, and a quick means of evaluation of multiple pathologies of the urinary system. CEUS also has the potential to reduce the overall economic burden on patients requiring long-term follow-up due to its low cost as compared to CT or MRI techniques. This comprehensive review focuses on the applications of CEUS in evaluating the urinary system from the kidneys to the urinary bladder. CEUS can be utilized in the kidney to evaluate complex cystic lesions, indeterminate lesions, pseudotumors (vs solid renal tumors), renal infections, and renal ischemic disorders. Additionally, CEUS has also been utilized in evaluating renal transplants. In the urinary bladder, CEUS is extremely useful in differentiating a bladder hematoma and bladder cancer when conventional US techniques show equivocal results. Quantitative parameters of time-intensity curves (TICs) of CEUS examinations have also been studied to stage and grade bladder cancers. Although promising, further research is needed to definitively stage bladder cancers and classify them as muscle-invasive or non-muscle invasive using quantitative CEUS to guide appropriate intervention. CEUS has been very effective in the classification of cystic renal lesions, however, further research is needed in differentiating benign from malignant renal masses.

Volumetric Quantitative Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Evaluation of Complex Renal Cysts: An Adjunctive Metric to the Bosniak Classification System to Predict Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Management of complex renal cysts is guided by the Bosniak classification system, which may be inadequate for risk stratification of patients for intervention. Fractional tumor vascularity (FV) calculated from volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images may provide additional useful information.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate CEUS and FV calculation for risk stratification of patients with complex renal cysts.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a pilot prospective study with institutional review board approval involving patients undergoing surgery for Bosniak IIF-IV complex renal cysts. CEUS was performed preoperatively on the day of surgery with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging and sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres as the ultrasound contrast agent.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A custom MATLAB program was used to select regions of interest on CEUS scans. FV was calculated according to FV = 1 - (total nonenhancing area/total lesion area). We assessed the ability of 2D- and 3D-derived percentage FV (2DFV%, and 3DFV%) and Bosniak classification schemes (pre-2019 [P2019B] and post-2019 [B2019]) to predict malignancy, aggressive histology, and upstaging on surgical pathology. Performance was assessed as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty eligible patients were included in final analysis, of whom 85% (n = 17) had Bosniak IV cysts and 85% (n = 17) had malignant disease on final pathology. Four (24%) of the malignant lesions were International Society of Urological Pathology grade 3-4. The AUC for predicting malignancy was 0.980, 0.824, 0.863, and 0.824 with P2019B, B2019, 2DFV%, and 3DFV%, respectively. When the Bosniak classification was combined with FV%, three models had an AUC of 1, while the combined 2DFV% + B2019 model had AUC of 0.980.

CONCLUSIONS

FV is a novel metric for evaluating complex cystic renal masses and enhances the ability of the Bosniak classification system to predict malignancy. This metric may serve as an adjunct in risk stratification for surgical intervention. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Cysts in the kidney are currently classified using a scheme called the Bosniak system. We assessed measurement of the percentage of vascular tissue (called fractional vascularity) in cysts on a special type of ultrasound scan. This promising test adds information when combined with the Bosniak system and can help in guiding appropriate treatment.

Ultrasound, CT, and MR Imaging for Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses

Cystic renal masses are often encountered during abdominal imaging. Although most of them are benign simple cysts, some cystic masses have malignant characteristics. The Bosniak classification system provides a useful way to classify cystic masses. The Bosniak classification is based on the results of a well-established computed tomography protocol. Over the past 30 years, the classification system has been refined and improved. This paper reviews the literature on this topic and compares the advantages and disadvantages of different screening and classification methods. Patients will benefit from multimodal diagnosis for lesions that are difficult to classify after a single examination.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys: principles and potential applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an extension and an enhanced form of ultrasound that allows real-time evaluation of the various structures in different vascular phases. The last decade has witnessed a widespread expansion of CEUS applications beyond the liver. It has shown fair potential in kidneys and its diagnostic efficacy is comparable to CT and MRI. Ultrasound is the well-accepted screening modality for renal pathologies, however, it underperforms in the characterization of the renal masses. CEUS can be beneficial in such cases as it can help in the characterization of such incidental masses in the same sitting. It has an excellent safety profile with no risk of radiation or contract-related nephropathy. It can aid in the correct categorization of renal cysts into one of the Bosniak classes and has proven its worth especially in complex cysts or indeterminate renal masses (especially Bosniak Category IIF and III). Few studies also describe its potential role in solid masses and in differentiating benign from malignant masses. Other areas of interest include infections, infarctions, trauma, follow-up of local ablative procedures, and VUR. Through this review, the readers shall get an insight into the various applications of CEUS in kidneys, with imaging examples.

EFSUMB 2020 Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Adapted Bosniak Cyst Categorization - Position Statement

The well-established Bosniak renal cyst classification is based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography determining the malignant potential of cystic renal lesions. Ultrasound has not been incorporated into this pathway. However, the development of ultrasound contrast agents coupled with the superior resolution of ultrasound makes it possible to redefine the imaging of cystic renal lesions. In this position statement, an EFSUMB Expert Task Force reviews, analyzes, and describes the accumulated knowledge and limitations and presents the current position on the use of ultrasound contrast agents in the evaluation of cystic renal lesions.

Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses

The detection of a renal mass is a relatively frequent occurrence in the daily practice of any Radiology Department. The diagnostic approaches depend on whether the lesion is cystic or solid. Cystic lesions can be managed using the Bosniak classification, while management of solid lesions depends on whether the lesion is well-defined or infiltrative. The approach to well-defined lesions focuses mainly on the differentiation between renal cancer and benign tumors such as angiomyolipoma (AML) and oncocytoma. Differential diagnosis of infiltrative lesions is wider, including primary and secondary malignancies and inflammatory disease, and knowledge of the patient history is essential. Radiologists may establish a possible differential diagnosis based on the imaging features of the renal masses and the clinical history. The aim of this review is to present the contribution of the different imaging techniques and image guided biopsies in the diagnostic management of cystic and solid renal lesions.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study

Multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) might be benefited from nephron-sparing surgery. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is used for the diagnosis of MCRNLMP but contrast-enhanced ultrasound has lack of nephrotoxicity and several advantages over contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. The purpose of the study was to compare diagnostic parameters of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound against contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of MCRNLMP in patients who faced curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass.Data regarding contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathological results of 219 patients who underwent curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass (Bosniak classification III or IV) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Bosniak classification for imaging modality and the 2016 WHO criteria for clinic pathology were used for detection of MCRNLMP.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathology were detected 68, 66, and 67 as a MCRNLMP respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 30.37% and 29.27% sensitivities for the detection of MCRNLMP. While 60% and 50% specificities respectively. Bosniak classification III (P = .045) and lower mean Hounsfield unit (P = .049) were associated with the prevalence of MCRNLMP. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was detected 6 and 7, while contrast-enhanced ultrasound detected 3 and 2 complex cystic renal mass as false positive and false negative MCRNLMP respectively. A contrast-enhanced ultrasound had 0.011 to 1.0 diagnostic confidence and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 0.045 to 0.983 diagnostic confidence for decision making of nephron-sparing surgeries.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may have better visualization of MCRNLMP than contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Level of Evidence: III.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic renal lesions in comparison to CT and MRI in a multicenter setting

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced-ultrasound (CEUS) has been frequently used in assessment of cystic renal lesions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the Bosniak classification in CEUS compared to CT and MRI in a multi-center setting.

METHODS

Bosniak classification in CEUS examinations of cystic renal lesions were compared to imaging findings in computed-tomography (ceCT) and magnetic-resonance-imaging (ceMRI). Imaging results were correlated to histopathological reports. All examinations were performed by experts (EFSUMB level 3) using up-to-date CEUS examination-protocols.

RESULTS

Overall, 173 cystic renal lesions were compared to subgroups CT (n = 87) and MRI (n = 86). Using Bosniak-classification 64/87 renal cysts (73.6%) were rated equal compared to CT with upgrade of four lesions (4.6%) and downgrade of 19 lesions (21.8%) by CT (Intra-class-correlation [ICC] coefficient of 0.824 [p < 0.001]). CEUS compared to MRI, presenting different scoring especially in classes Bosniak IIF (n = 16/31) and Bosniak III (n = 16/28) with an ICC coefficient of 0.651 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEUS can visualize even finest septal and small nodular wall enhancement, which may result in an upgrade of cystic lesions into a higher Bosniak class compared to CT or MRI. Thus, a modification of the Bosniak classification on CEUS may reduce unnecessary biopsies and surgery.

Active surveillance of small renal masses

Most renal masses incidentally detected by cross-sectional images are benign, being mainly cysts, and if they are malignant, they are indolent in nature with limited metastatic potential. Enhanced renal masses less than 4 cm in size are known as small renal masses (SRMs), and their growth rate (GR) and the possibility of developing metastasis are extremely low. Delayed intervention of SRMs by closed and routine imaging follow-up known as active surveillance (AS) is now an option according to urological guidelines. Radiologists have a key position in AS management of SRMs even unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) and also in the follow-up of complex renal cysts by Bosniak cyst classification system. Radiologists play a key role in the AS of both unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) SRMs as well as in the follow-up of complex renal cysts using the Bosniak cyst classification system. Indeed, radiologists must determine which patients with SRMs or complex renal cysts can be included in AS, establish the follow-up radiological test algorithm to be used in different scenarios, perform measurements in follow-up tests, and decide when AS should be discontinued. The purpose of this article is to review the indications and management of AS in SRMs, especially focused on specific scenarios, such as complex renal cysts and multifocal renal tumors (sporadic or hereditary). In this work, the authors aimed to provide a thorough review of imaging in the context of active surveillance of renal masses.

How does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography influence Bosniak classification for complex cystic renal mass compared with conventional ultrasonography?

To analyze the degree and pattern of influence of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) on the Bosniak classification system for complex renal cystic mass as compared with conventional ultrasonography (US). One hundred two consecutive patients with complex renal cystic masses were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic performance of the Conventional US and CEUS were evaluated separately for malignant and benign lesions. The diagnostic concordance rates were calculated according to pathologic diagnoses. ROC curve analysis determined the confidence in the diagnostic accuracy by calculating the area under each ROC curve. Compared to the Conventional US, septae number, wall and/or septae thickness, solid component and the Bosniak classification changed in 17 (16.7%), 39 (38.2%), 31 (30.4%), and 67 (65.7%) patients as compared with 0 (0.0%), 21 (20.6%), 31 (30.4%), and 37 (36.3%) of the treatment strategy that changed after CEUS respectively. The diagnostic performance of CEUS showed overall higher in terms of sensitivity (100.0 vs 97.2%); specificity (90.9 vs 62.1%); positive predictive value (PPV) (85.7 vs 58.3%); negative predictive value (NPV) (100.0 vs 97.6%); and the concordance with pathology (kappa = 0.876 vs 0.515). CEUS had a higher diagnostic confidence (P < .05) according to the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.968 vs 0.799).CEUS performed better than the Conventional US in the diagnosis of complex renal cystic mass, and it might be considered as the first tool to evaluate a complex cystic renal mass, especially for these Bosniak III masses displaying the presence of hemorrhage or infection.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Imaging and Intervention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal imaging and intervention. The goal of this article is to review the practical applications of CEUS in the kidney, including renal mass characterization, treatment monitoring during and after percutaneous ablation, and biopsy guidance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence suggests that CEUS allows accurate differentiation of solid and cystic renal masses and is an acceptable alternative to either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterization of indeterminate renal masses. CEUS is sensitive and specific for diagnosing residual or recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following percutaneous ablation. Furthermore, given its excellent spatial and temporal resolution, CEUS is well suited to demonstrate tumoral microvascularity associated with malignant renal masses and is an effective complement to conventional grayscale ultrasound (US) for percutaneous biopsy guidance. Currently underutilized, CEUS is an important problem-solving tool in renal imaging and intervention whose role will continue to expand in coming years.

Clinical use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound beyond the liver: a focus on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively novel, but increasingly used, diagnostic imaging modality. In recent years, due to its safety, quickness, and repeatability, several studies have demonstrated the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of CEUS. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology has recently updated the previous guidelines from 2012 for the use of CEUS in non-hepatic applications. This review deals with the clinical use and applications of CEUS for the evaluation of non-hepatic abdominal organs, focusing on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with MRI in the diagnosis of complex cystic renal masses: a meta-analysis

Background The differential diagnosis of cystic renal masses still faces great challenges. There has been no systematically assessment to compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of cystic renal masses. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of MRI for cystic renal masses. Material and Methods A systematic search was performed for literature evaluating the diagnostic performance of CEUS or MRI in cystic renal masses. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies 2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of each study included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUCs-SROC) curve for CEUS and MRI were calculated, respectively. Results Seventeen studies with 1142 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for CEUS /MRI were 0.95/0.92, 0.84/0.91, 5.62/6.74, and 0.09/0.13, respectively. The AUCs-SROC curves for the two methods were 95.66% and 94.65%. The subgroup analysis indicated that the scanning slice thickness may influence the diagnostic efficacy of MRI. Conclusion Both CEUS and MRI have good diagnostic performance for cystic renal masses and can provide the reference for clinicians. CEUS is more sensitive but less specific than MRI.

Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

The morbidity of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has shown an obvious ascending tendency with the increase of cesarean delivery in China and other countries. The timely diagnosis and treatment of CSP currently relies on medical imaging technology. In this article, we analyzed and compare the imaging methods in diagnosis of CSP. The imaging methods to diagnose CSP include traditional two-dimensional color/power Doppler ultrasound (2D-US), three-dimensional color/power Doppler ultrasound (3D-US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). 2D-US provides important information including the location and size of gestational sac (GS), embryo with or without heart activity, and the relationship between the GS and scar. It can also divide CSP into different types, which are convenient for the choice of clinical treatment. CEUS can observe the perfusion of CSP in real-time, the arrival time of GS in CSP is earlier than that of the myometrium. It provides reliable evidence for diagnosis and evaluation of the treatment of CSP, which is helpful for making treatment plans and post-treatment follow-up. Combined use of ultrasound and CEUS could be a problem-solving method for CSP when conventional ultrasound is often inconclusive. Ultrasound has been accepted as the first-line imaging method and an important guiding method for CSP, supervising local methotrexate injection and curettage.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Classification of Previously Indeterminate Renal Lesions

OBJECTIVES

To determine the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) for characterizing renal lesions that were indeterminate on prior imaging.

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluated all patients who underwent renal contrast-enhanced US examinations from 2006 to 2015 at our tertiary care hospital. We compared the number of lesions definitively characterized by contrast-enhanced US with the indeterminate lesions by prior imaging. The accuracy of contrast-enhanced US was compared with the final diagnosis by histologic examination and follow-up (mean, 3.63 years). Accuracy and agreement estimates were compared with the exact binomial distribution to assess statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 134 lesions were evaluated with contrast-enhanced US, and 106 were indeterminate by preceding computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or US. Only the largest lesion per patient was included in analysis. A total of 95.7% (90 of 94) of the previously indeterminate lesions were successfully classified with contrast-enhanced US. The sensitivity was 100% (20 of 20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%; P < .0001); specificity was 85.7% (18 of 21; 95% CI, 62%-97%; P = .0026); positive predictive value was 87.0% (20 of 23; 95% CI, 66%-97%; P = .0005); negative predictive value was 100% (18 of 18; 95% CI, 81%-100%; P < .001); and accuracy was 90.2% (37 of 41; 95% CI, 80%-98%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced US has a high likelihood of definitively classifying a renal lesion that is indeterminate by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or conventional US.

Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically review the literature on the Bosniak classification system in CT to determine its diagnostic performance to diagnose malignant cystic lesions and the prevalence of malignancy in Bosniak categories.

Methods

A predefined database search was performed from 1 January 1986 to 18 January 2016. Two independent reviewers extracted data on malignancy rates in Bosniak categories and several covariates using predefined criteria. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis included data pooling, subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias.

Results

A total of 35 studies, which included 2,578 lesions, were investigated. Data on observer experience, inter-observer variation and technical CT standards were insufficiently reported. The pooled rate of malignancy increased from Bosniak I (3.2 %, 95 % CI 0–6.8, I² = 5 %) to Bosniak II (6 %, 95 % CI 2.7–9.3, I² = 32 %), IIF (6.7 %, 95 % CI 5–8.4, I² = 0 %), III (55.1 %, 95 % CI 45.7–64.5, I² = 89 %) and IV (91 %, 95 % CI 87.7–94.2, I² = 36). Several study design-related influences on malignancy rates and subsequent diagnostic performance indices were identified.

Conclusion

The Bosniak classification is an accurate tool with which to stratify the risk of malignancy in renal cystic lesions.

Key points

• The Bosniak classification can accurately rule out malignancy.

• Specificity remains moderate at 74 % (95 % CI 64–82).

• Follow-up examinations should be considered in Bosniak IIF and Bosniak II cysts.

• Data on the influence of reader experience and inter-reader variability are insufficient.

• Technical CT standards and publication year did not influence diagnostic performance.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4631-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the classification of CT-indeterminate renal lesions

OBJECTIVE

Focal renal lesions are common incidental findings on computed tomography (CT). For lesions with a cystic appearance, the Bosniak classification system has enabled an important separation of benign and (potentially) malignant cysts, giving a practical guide for management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a problem-solving modality for classification of indeterminate renal lesions detected with CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 140 consecutive patients with 148 indeterminate renal lesions were examined with ultrasound combined with CEUS (81 men and 59 women with mean age 63.8 years).

RESULTS

Altogether, 146 lesions were classified by CEUS in categories according to the Bosniak classification system, or as solid lesions. Mean lesion diameter was 30 mm (range 5-166 mm). Nine lesions were classified as category I, 32 as category II and 59 as category IIF ("non-surgical lesions"). 48 IIF cysts were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 4 years and 8 months): three lesions were upgraded to category III (6%) and 45 were stable category. 19 lesions had a more complex cystic appearance: 12 were classified as category III and seven as category IV cysts. 27 lesions were diagnosed as solid, enhancing tumors. In total, 25 patients with lesions of category III, IV and solid ("surgical lesions") underwent renal surgery, with malignancy diagnosed in 18.

CONCLUSION

In the common setting of indeterminate renal lesions incidentally detected with a CT exam, CEUS has the potential to classify lesions into "non-surgical" and "surgical" categories, providing a platform for urological decision making, while avoiding radiation exposure.

Safety, reliability and accuracy of small renal tumour biopsies: results from a multi-institution registry

OBJECTIVE

To validate, in a multi-institution review, the safety, accuracy and reliability of renal tumour biopsy (RTB) and its role in decreasing unnecessary treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multi-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent RTB to characterize a small renal mass (SRM) between 2011 and May 2015. Patients were identified using the prospectively maintained Canadian Kidney Cancer information system. Diagnostic and concordance rates were presented using proportions, whereas factors associated with a diagnostic RTB were identified using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 373 biopsied SRMs, the initial biopsy was diagnostic in 87% of cases. Of the 47 non-diagnostic biopsies, 15 had a repeat biopsy of which, 80% were diagnostic. When both were combined, therefore, a diagnosis was obtained in 91% of SRMs. Of these, 18% were benign. Size was the only factor found to be associated with achieving a diagnostic biopsy. RTB histology and nuclear grade (high or low) were found to be highly concordant with surgical pathology (86 and 81%, respectively). Of the discordant tumours (n = 16), all were upgraded from low to high grade on surgical pathology. Adverse events were rare (<1% of cases).

CONCLUSION

The present multi-institution study confirms that RTB of SRMs is safe, accurate and reliable across institutions, while decreasing unnecessary treatment. Given our findings, RTBs may be a helpful tool with which to triage SRMs and guide appropriate management.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

We compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of renal cystic lesions via a meta-analysis to determine the value of CEUS in the prediction of the malignant potential of complex renal cysts. Eleven studies were evaluated: 4 control studies related to CEUS and CECT, 3 studies related to CEUS and 4 studies related to CECT. According to the random effects model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for CEUS/CECT were 0.95/0.90, 0.79/0.85, 4.39/5.00, and 0.10/0.15, respectively. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUCs-SROC) curves for the two methods were 94.24% and 93.39%, and the estimated Q values were 0.8805 and 0.8698, respectively. Comparing the Q index values of CEUS and CECT revealed no significant difference between the two methods (P>0.05). When compared with conventional CECT, CEUS is also useful for diagnosing renal cystic lesions in the clinic.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic and solid renal lesions: a review

Incidentally detected renal lesions have traditionally undergone imaging characterization by contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of renal lesions is a relatively novel, but increasingly utilized, diagnostic modality. CEUS has advantages over CECT and MRI including unmatched temporal resolution due to continuous real-time imaging, lack of nephrotoxicity, and potential cost savings. CEUS has been most thoroughly evaluated in workup of complex cystic renal lesions, where it has been proposed as a replacement for CECT. Using CEUS to differentiate benign from malignant solid renal lesions has also been studied, but has proven difficult due to overlapping imaging features. Monitoring minimally invasive treatments of renal masses is an emerging application of CEUS. An additional promising area is quantitative analysis of renal masses using CEUS. This review discusses the scientific literature on renal CEUS, with an emphasis on imaging features differentiating various cystic and solid renal lesions.

Management of incidental renal masses: Time to consider contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Proliferation of imaging studies for different clinical purposes and continuous improvement of imaging technology have led to an increasing number of incidental findings of renal masses. It is estimated that over 50% of patients older than 50 years have at least one renal mass. The majority of incidental renal masses are simple cysts that can be easily diagnosed by conventional ultrasonography. However, some incidental renal masses are not simple cysts, and differentiation between benign and malignant entities requires further imaging modalities. In the past, multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were considered the primary imaging modalities used to characterize and stage complex cystic and solid renal lesions. Currently, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography represents a novel alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography employs microbubble contrast agents that allow the study of different enhancement phases of the kidney without risk of nephrotoxicity and radiation exposure. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of complex renal cysts is comparable to that of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and several studies have demonstrated its reliability also in identifying solid lesions such as pseudotumors, typical angiomyolipomas, and clear cell renal carcinomas. Considering the high incidence of incidental renal masses and the need for rapid and reliable diagnosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could be proposed as the first step in the diagnostic work-up of renal masses because of its safety and cost effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for the characterization of cystic and solid renal masses.

The clinical use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the kidney

Traditional B-Mode and Doppler sonography have been the stalwart of renal tract imaging for many years, and indeed, are in daily use in most centres as the modality of choice for the initial assessment of renal pathology. However, traditional ultrasound scanning can be limited in its ability to accurately characterise renal pathology, and can be inaccurate at determining benign from malignant lesions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound conveys many benefits, being safe (especially in patients with renal dysfunction), does not require the use of ionising radiation, is quick and relatively cheap and can help to establish whether a focal renal lesion is sinister. Furthermore, it is our experience that contrast-enhanced ultrasound is not a difficult technique to master for the experienced ultrasound practitioner. In this article, we discuss the technique, interpretation and value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal imaging, and describe how we use it in our practice.

[Managing focal incidental renal lesions]

Incidental renal lesions are relatively common in daily radiological practice. It is important to know the different diagnostic possibilities for incidentally detected lesions, depending on whether they are cystic or solid. The management of cystic lesions is guided by the Bosniak classification. In solid lesions, the goal is to differentiate between renal cancer and benign tumors such as fat-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma. Radiologists need to know the recommendations for the management of these lesions and the usefulness of the different imaging techniques and interventional procedures in function of the characteristics of the incidental lesion and the patient's life expectancy.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of cystic renal mass: in comparison to contrast-enhanced CT and conventional ultrasound

PURPOSE

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in evaluating cystic renal lesions compared with conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS

One hundred and three patients with complex cystic renal masses underwent preoperative US and CEUS, among which 70 conducted CECT at our institution. The images were analyzed with the number of septa, septa and wall thickness and the presence of solid component, and final diagnosis was made.

RESULTS

In malignancies, CEUS demonstrated more septa, thicker wall or septa, and more solid components than US and CECT. CEUS permitted categorization of 51.7% (30/58) and 28.6% (10/35) of malignant tumors in higher grade than by US and CECT, respectively. In benign lesions, CEUS detected more septa than CECT and correctly diagnosed benign cysts which appeared as solid lesions in US. CEUS permitted downgrading of 71.1% (32/45) and 17.1% (6/35) of benign lesions compared to US and CECT. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was better than US for benign cystic lesions. The phenomenon that solid-like component by US did not enhance by CEUS was a strong predictor of benign disease, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. Enhancement of solid, soft tissue by CEUS was highly predictive of malignancy, with a PPV of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS was superior to US and CECT in visualizing the number of septa septa and wall thickness, and the presence of solid component of cystic renal lesions. CEUS may play a similar role to CECT in the diagnosis of renal cystic lesions, and better than US.

How simple are 'simple renal cysts'?

The increasing use of medical imaging as an investigative tool is leading to the incidental and frequent finding of renal cysts in the general population. The presence of a solitary or multiple renal cysts has been generally considered benign in the absence of a family history of renal cystic disease or evidence of chronic kidney disease. Nonetheless, a number of recent studies have questioned this consensus by reported associations with the development of hypertension or malignant change. For these reasons, some clinicians consider the presence of renal cysts to be a contraindication to kidney donation. The situation is complicated by the different usage of the term 'simple' by some radiologists (to indicate non-complex lesions) or nephrologists (to indicate age-related non-hereditary lesions). We propose that the term 'simple' be replaced with the morphological description, Stage I renal cyst (Bosniak Classification). The presence of a Stage I renal cyst should not preclude kidney donation. However, occult renal disease should be excluded and appropriate donor assessment performed.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver and kidney

The clinical use of noncardiac contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) has been steadily gaining momentum. CEUS is a reliable and safe technique with a diverse array of applications. This article reviews the current and potential future clinical applications of CEUS. Emphasis will be placed on evaluating focal lesions with the liver and kidney. Contrast agent composition and mechanism are also briefly reviewed.

New modalities for evaluation and surveillance of complex renal cysts

PURPOSE

The increased use of abdominal imaging has led to more frequent detection of incidental renal cysts. Since the inception of the Bosniak classification system, management of Bosniak I, III and IV cysts has been clearly defined, while evaluation and management of Bosniak II and IIF cysts have remained a clinical dilemma. Discussions of new imaging modalities are becoming increasingly prevalent in the radiological literature. In this context we performed a comprehensive review of the recent literature on complex renal cysts focusing on new imaging modalities, surveillance strategies and biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review of articles published from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2013 via MEDLINE(®), EMBASE and the Cochrane Collection using a predetermined search strategy. All studies included were performed in humans older than 18 years, were written in English and had an abstract available for review. We grouped studies into 1 of 5 categories, ie computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, biopsy and surveillance.

RESULTS

While computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast enhancement remain the gold standard to evaluate cystic lesions of the kidney, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced ultrasound have surfaced as new tools for assessment of complex cysts. Comparative effectiveness studies on these new imaging modalities are limited. Image guided biopsy has increasingly been shown to be useful for evaluation of intermediate (Bosniak II and IIF) complex cysts. We found few studies providing guidance on the duration and/or intensity of surveillance required for intermediate complex renal cysts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although new and enhanced techniques are in development and may be useful in the future management of complex renal cysts, there is a paucity of data regarding the value of these new techniques. Future research should focus on surveillance of intermediate complex renal cysts, particularly on the ideal frequency and type of imaging required.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys: what is it capable of?

One of the many imaging uses of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is studying a wide variety of kidney pathology, due to its ability to detect microvascular blood flow in real time without affecting renal function. CEUS enables dynamic assessment and quantification of microvascularisation up to capillary perfusion. The objective of this paper is to briefly refresh basic knowledge of ultrasound (US) contrast agents' physical properties, to study technical details of CEUS scanning in the kidneys, and to review the commonest renal indications for CEUS, with imaging examples in comparison to baseline unenhanced US and computed tomography when performed. Safety matters and limitations of CEUS of the kidneys are also discussed.

[Imaging renal cell carcinoma]

Renal cell carcinoma is the eighth most common malignancy in adults and the most common malignancy in the kidney. It is thus a very common disease for radiologists. This review aims to provide a general overview of the imaging techniques used to diagnose, characterize, and help plan the treatment of renal cell carcinoma as well as to review basic aspects related to staging, imaging-guided percutaneous treatment, and follow-up in the most common clinical scenarios.

Office ultrasound for the urologist

Imaging of the genitourinary tract is essential in the workup of the majority of the conditions seen daily by urologists. The use of ultrasound in the office provides a safe, low cost, and efficient way for the clinician to evaluate the patient in real time. Ultrasound can allow for bedside diagnosis in many conditions and assist in treatment planning. This chapter covers the major applications of office ultrasound for the urologist as well as discusses future applications of ultrasound for the office setting.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominal imaging

The administration of a contrast agent is considered an essential tool to evaluate abdominal diseases using Ultrasound. The most targeted organ is the liver, especially to characterize focal liver lesions and to assess the response to percutaneous treatment. However, the expanding abdominal indications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound make this technique an important tool in the assessment of organ perfusion including the evaluation of ischemic, traumatic, and inflammatory diseases.