CT features of hepatic metastases from hepatoid adenocarcinoma

Differential diagnostic value of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHA) from gastric adenocarcinoma (GA).

Methods

This retrospective study included 160 patients (44 with GHA vs. 116 with GA) who underwent preoperative CE-CT. Preoperative serum concentrations of tumor biomarkers and CT imaging features were analyzed, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), tumor location, growth pattern, size, enhancement pattern, cystic changes, and mass contrast enhancement. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate useful tumor markers and CT imaging features for differentiating GHA from GA.

Results

When compared to GA, GHA showed a higher serum AFP [13.27 ng/ml (5.2-340.1) vs. 2.7 ng/ml (2.2-3.98), P <0.001] and CEA levels [4.07 ng/ml (2.73-12.53) vs. 2.42 ng/ml (1.38-4.31), P <0.001]. CT imaging showed GHA with a higher frequency of tumor location in the gastric antrum (P <0.001). GHA had significantly lower attenuation values at the portal venous phase [PCA, (82.34 HU ± 8.46 vs. 91.02 HU ± 10.62, P <0.001)] and delayed phase [DCA, (72.89 HU ± 8.83 vs. 78.27 HU ± 9.51, P <0.001)] when compared with GA. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP level were independent predictors of differentiation between GHA and GA. The combination of these three predictors performed well in discriminating GHA from GA, with an AUC of 0.903, a sensitivity of 86.36%, and a specificity of 81.90%.

Conclusions

Integrated evaluation of tumor markers and CT features, including tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP, allowed for more accurate differentiation of GHA from GA.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: CT findings

Objective

To analyze the CT findings of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and improve the diagnosis accuracy of this condition.

Methods

The CT images of 22 pathologically confirmed HAS patients were analyzed retrospectively. We investigated the location of lesions, morphology, enhancement features, area of invasion into surrounding organs, lymph node metastasis, and venous tumor thrombus.

Results

Among the 22 patients (17 men and 5 women, the mean age was 61.41 ± 9.83 years ranging from 36 to 80 years) with HAS; the morphology of tumors included mass (n = 5), focal ulcer (n = 7), and infiltrating ulcer (n = 10). Extraserous fat was invaded in 12 cases. Enhancement scans showed continuous enhancement in all cases. The CT values of unenhanced scan, the arterial phase, and the portal venous phase are 30.36 ± 6.46, 60.91 ± 17.80, and 75.64 ± 22.09 (Hounsfield Unit, HU), respectively. In six cases, the tumor infiltrated the surrounding organs: liver (n = 1), pancreas (n = 2), and both liver and pancreas (n = 3). In 16 out of 22 patients (72.3%), suspicious lymph node metastasis at CT imaging has then been confirmed by pathological specimens. Intrahepatic metastasis was found in 14 cases. Seven patients had venous tumor thrombus: three patients developed tumor thrombus in the main trunk and intrahepatic branches of the portal vein and two patients in the portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein simultaneously.

Conclusion

The CT scans of HAS often show a thickened gastric wall and infiltrating ulceration. Infiltration into extraserosal fat is often seen. Enhancement scans show a continuous and progressive enhancement of lesions. Lymph node metastasis, intrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein tumor thrombus are common in HAS patients.

Computed Tomography Features and Clinical Prognostic Characteristics of Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

PURPOSE

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical, computed tomography (CT), and prognostic features of HAS to increase the awareness of this entity and determine its distinguishing features from non-HAS tumors.

METHODS

The CT features and clinical data of 47 patients in our hospital with pathologically documented HAS were retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant differences between pure HAS (pHAS) and mixed HAS (mHAS) were determined. In addition, 141 patients with non-HAS tumors in the same T stage in the same period were selected as the control group. The data were compared between the two groups, and factors affecting the prognosis of HAS were analyzed. In addition, we included 9 patients with HAS and 27 patients with non-HAS tumors from another center for external validation.

RESULTS

The patients in the HAS group were predominantly men (n = 33), and the tumor location was mostly the cardia or fundus (n = 27). Between the HAS and non-HAS groups, there were observed differences in terms of: sex, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen (CA)-125, and CA-724 levels; longest tumor diameter; degree of differentiation; vascular invasion; N stage, M stage, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage; thickest tumor diameter; plain CT attenuation; arterial-phase CT attenuation; CT attenuation between the venous and arterial phases; enhancement modes; and degrees of enhancement (all P < 0.05). In the data from another center for external validation, there were observed differences in terms of: age, degree of differentiation, vascular invasion, thickest tumor diameter, the ratio of arterial CT attenuation to CT attenuation of the abdominal aorta at the same level (RA), CT attenuation difference between the venous phase and arterial phase (HUv-a) (all P < 0.05). The results of the multivariate analysis revealed that the independent factors for differentiation were serum AFP level (P = 0.001), M stage (P = 0.038), and tumor enhancement on CT (P = 0.014). Among patients in the HAS group, 72.34% had pHAS and 27.66% had mHAS. The thickest tumor diameter and the longest short diameter of the metastatic lymph nodes of the mHAS group were on average 6.39 cm and 1.45 cm, respectively, which were larger than those in the pHAS group. The median progression-free survival time was 18.25 months in the HAS group, which was shorter than that in the non-HAS group (72.96 months; P = 0.001). The median overall survival time in the HAS group was 24.80 months, which was shorter than that in the non-HAS group (67.96 months; P = 0.001). The factors affecting the prognosis of HAS were M stage (P = 0.001), overall TNM stage (P = 0.048), presence of vascular cancer emboli (P = 0.040), and pHAS type (P = 0.046). Multifactorial analysis revealed that M stage (P = 0.027) and pHAS type (P = 0.009) were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of HAS.

CONCLUSION

Although HAS is a rare clinical entity, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of gastric tumors. Patients with HAS often have advanced-stage disease at presentation and a worse prognosis than patients with non-HAS tumors. CT findings, combined with laboratory results, can support the diagnosis of HAS. However, the final diagnosis needs to be confirmed with a histopathologic examination. If the postoperative pathologic findings reveal the mHAS type, a rapid clinical intervention and a detailed follow-up with CT are essential.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Current Perspectives and New Developments

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignant tumor, accounting for only 0.17-15% of gastric cancers. Patients are often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, and their symptoms are similar to conventional gastric cancer (CGC) without specific clinical manifestation. Morphologically, HAC has identical morphology and immunophenotype compared to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is considered to be an underestimation in diagnosis due to its rare incidence, and no consensus is reached regarding therapy. HAS generally presents with more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis than CGC. The present review summarizes the current literature and relevant knowledge to elaborate on the epidemic, potential mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis to help clinicians accurately diagnose and treat this malignant tumor.

Alpha-Fetoprotein-Producing Early Gastric Cancer with Intramucosal Hepatoid and Fetal Enteric Differentiation

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric carcinomas (AFPGCs) are relatively rare tumors known to have a poor prognosis and commonly found as advanced lesions. Histologically, AFPGCs have been described as having hepatoid and fetal enteric (enteroblastic) morphology and are associated with conventional adenocarcinomas. Prior studies reported a hepatoid component present only in invasive areas and hypothesized that AFPGCs may develop hepatoid features during the process of tumor invasion. We report three cases of AFP-producing early gastric cancer which had an intramucosal hepatoid component. Immunohistochemistry showed that the hepatoid component was diffusely immunoreactive for SALL4, AFP, arginase-1, and HepPar1, and focally for CDX2 and PDX1. An intramucosal transition between the hepatoid component and conventional intramucosal adenocarcinoma was identified. Two patients also had a coexistent fetal enteric component, which was admixed with a hepatoid component. Although at an early stage one patient subsequently developed liver metastasis and a second patient was suspected of having liver metastasis, these were not biopsy-proven. The latter patient had a previous history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and SALL4 was used on the HCC to distinguish metastatic/further HCC from a gastric metastatic primary with hepatoid differentiation.

Therapeutic Approaches to Gastric Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma: Current Perspectives

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare subgroup of gastric cancer (GC). Morphologically, this tumor exhibits both adenocarcinomatous and hepatocellular differentiation, and most tumors show immunohistochemical staining for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or elevated AFP serum levels. The diagnosis of HAS is frequently delayed, and at least half of patients have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Despite a lack of evidence, treatment approaches have mostly followed principles for the treatment of common gastric cancer (CGC), including radical surgery in eligible patients with curative intent. The indications for and the type of adjuvant systemic treatments remain unclear. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence allowing any firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the best treatment for patients with metastatic HAS (mHAS). Chemotherapy regimens, including cisplatin-based chemotherapy, are considered the most efficient first-line systemic treatment in advanced situations. Their combination with targeted therapy (i.e., trastuzumab) in HER2-positive tumors seems promising. The rarity of these patients and the scarce and heterogeneous literature on this particular subgroup of GC make it difficult to provide any robust evidence for the clinical management of patients with HAS.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum With Liver Metastasis in a Patient With Ulcerative Colitis

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HA) is a rare malignant tumor of extrahepatic origin that morphologically and immunophenotypically resembles hepatocellular carcinoma. We report a case of rectal HA with hepatic metastasis arising in a 38-year-old male with a history of ulcerative colitis. Despite elevated alpha-fetoprotein, contrast enhancement of the hepatic mass was not consistent with hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry revealed the diagnosis, and the patient was started on palliative chemotherapy. Colorectal HA should be considered when evaluating malignant lesions in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease and can be distinguished from other tumors based on alpha-fetoprotein, imaging, and immunostaining.

Ectopic hepatocellular carcinoma manifesting multiple abdominal masses: A case report

RATIONALE

Ectopic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rare disease that mostly originates from an ectopic liver.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was admitted with upper abdominal distention for 3 months, which aggravated after meal.

DIAGNOSES

A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple abdominal masses. After exploratory laparotomy and histological examination, the patient was diagnosed as ectopic HCC.

INTERVENTIONS

Exploratory laparotomy was performed for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment.

OUTCOMES

The tumors were excised by surgery and his symptom of upper abdominal distention was disappeared. A second surgery was performed for tumor recurrence and the patient died with total survival time of 22 months.

LESSONS

Ectopic HCC was usually in clinically silent, unless compression symptoms or intra-abdominal bleeding appeared. It did not have any typical character features in CT or Magnetic resonance imaging, may present with multiple abdominal masses. Surgery resection seems to be one of the effective treatments for ectopic HCC, though it is detected with multiple tumors.