1
|
Wang DS, Shen J, Majdalany BS, Khaja MS, Bhatti S, Ferencik M, Ganguli S, Gunn AJ, Heitner JF, Johri AM, Obara P, Ohle R, Sadeghi MM, Schermerhorn M, Siracuse JJ, Steenburg SD, Sutphin PD, Vijay K, Waite K, Steigner ML. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S513-S520. [PMID: 38040468 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as abnormal dilation of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter to 3.0 cm or greater. The natural history of AAA consists of progressive expansion and potential rupture. Although most AAAs are clinically silent, a pulsatile abdominal mass identified on physical examination may indicate the presence of an AAA. When an AAA is suspected, an imaging study is essential to confirm the diagnosis. This document reviews the relative appropriateness of various imaging procedures for the initial evaluation of suspected AAA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Wang
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
| | - Jody Shen
- Research Author, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Bill S Majdalany
- Panel Chair, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Minhaj S Khaja
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Salman Bhatti
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Maros Ferencik
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - John F Heitner
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Amer M Johri
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; American Society of Echocardiography
| | - Piotr Obara
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Robert Ohle
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Mehran M Sadeghi
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Society for Vascular Surgery
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Boston Medical Centers, Boston University, and Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Society for Vascular Surgery
| | - Scott D Steenburg
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | | | - Kanupriya Vijay
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kathleen Waite
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin J, Chen S, Yao Y, Yan M. Status of diagnosis and therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1199804. [PMID: 37576107 PMCID: PMC10416641 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are characterized by localized dilation of the abdominal aorta. They are associated with several serious consequences, including compression of adjacent abdominal organs, pain, treatment-related financial expenditure. The main complication of AAA is aortic rupture, which is responsible for about 200,000 deaths per year worldwide. An increasing number of researchers are dedicating their efforts to study AAA, resulting in significant progress in this field. Despite the commendable progress made thus far, there remains a lack of established methods to effectively decelerate the dilation of aneurysms. Therefore, further studies are imperative to expand our understanding and enhance our knowledge concerning AAAs. Although numerous factors are known to be associated with the occurrence and progression of AAA, the exact pathway of development remains unclear. While asymptomatic at most times, AAA features a highly unpredictable disease course, which could culminate in the highly deadly rupture of the aneurysmal aorta. Current guidelines recommend watchful waiting and lifestyle adjustment for smaller, slow-growing aneurysms, while elective/prophylactic surgical repairs including open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair are recommended for larger aneurysms that have grown beyond certain thresholds (55 mm for males and 50 mm for females). The latter is a minimally invasive procedure and is widely believed to be suited for patients with a poor general condition. However, several concerns have recently been raised regarding the postoperative complications and possible loss of associated survival benefits on it. In this review, we aimed to highlight the current status of diagnosis and treatment of AAA by an in-depth analysis of the findings from literatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinping Lin
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuwei Chen
- Department of anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuanyuan Yao
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Yan
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Contrella BN, Khaja MS, Majdalany BS, Kim CY, Kalva SP, Beck AW, Browne WF, Clough RE, Ferencik M, Fleischman F, Gunn AJ, Hickey SM, Kandathil A, Kim KM, Monroe EJ, Ochoa Chaar CI, Scheidt MJ, Smolock AR, Steenburg SD, Waite K, Pinchot JW, Steigner ML. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection: Treatment Planning and Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S265-S284. [PMID: 37236748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
As the incidence of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (aneurysm and dissection) rises and the complexity of endovascular and surgical treatment options increases, imaging follow-up of patients remains crucial. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathology without intervention should be monitored carefully for changes in aortic size or morphology that could portend rupture or other complication. Patients who are post endovascular or open surgical aortic repair should undergo follow-up imaging to evaluate for complications, endoleak, or recurrent pathology. Considering the quality of diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are the preferred imaging modalities for follow-up of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology for most patients. The extent of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology and its potential complications involve multiple regions of the body requiring imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in most patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bill S Majdalany
- Panel Chair, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Charles Y Kim
- Panel Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sanjeeva P Kalva
- Panel Vice-Chair, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam W Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; Society for Vascular Surgery
| | | | - Rachel E Clough
- St Thomas' Hospital, King's College, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, London, United Kingdom; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Maros Ferencik
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
| | - Fernando Fleischman
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California; American Association for Thoracic Surgery
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Sean M Hickey
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Asha Kandathil
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Karen M Kim
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
| | | | | | | | - Amanda R Smolock
- Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Scott D Steenburg
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Kathleen Waite
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | - Jason W Pinchot
- Specialty Chair, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Tannir AH, Chahrour MA, Chamseddine H, Assi S, Boyajian T, Haddad FF, Hoballah JJ. Outcomes and Cost-Analysis of Open Versus Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Developing Country: A 15-year Experience at a Tertiary Medical Center. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 90:58-66. [PMID: 36309170 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the most common procedure for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms based on multiple studies conducted in the western world. The implication of such findings in developing countries is not well demonstrated. The objective of this study was to compare medical outcomes and costs of EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR) in a developing country. METHODS This is a retrospective study of all patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 2005 and 2020 at a tertiary medical center in a developing country. Medical records were used to retrieve demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative complications. Medical records were also used to provide data on the need of reintervention, date of last follow-up, and mortality. RESULTS The study included a total of 164 patients. Median follow-up time was 41 months. The mean age was 69.9 +/- 7.84 years and 90.24% (n = 148) of patients were males. Regarding long-term mortality outcomes, no significant difference was detected between both groups; OSR patients had a survival rate of 91.38% and 74.86% at 5 and 10 years, compared to 77.29% and 56.52% in the EVAR group (P value = 0.10). Both groups had comparable long-term reintervention rates (P value = 0.334). The OSR group was charged significantly less than the EVAR group ($27,666.35 vs. $44,528.04, P value = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS OSR and EVAR have comparable survival and reintervention outcomes. Unlike what was reported in developed countries, patients undergoing OSR in countries with low hospital stay costs incur lower treatment costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamad A Chahrour
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa, IA
| | | | - Sahar Assi
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Talar Boyajian
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Fadi F Haddad
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jamal J Hoballah
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alexander LF, Overfield CJ, Sella DM, Clingan MJ, Erben YM, Metcalfe AM, Robbin ML, Caserta MP. Contrast-enhanced US Evaluation of Endoleaks after Endovascular Stent Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Radiographics 2022; 42:1758-1775. [PMID: 36190857 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) carries high morbidity and mortality. Elective repair of AAA with endovascular stent-grafts requires lifetime imaging surveillance for potential complications, most commonly endoleaks. Because endoleaks result in antegrade or retrograde systemic arterialized flow into the excluded aneurysm sac, patients are at risk for recurrent aneurysm sac growth with the potential to rupture. Multiphasic CT has been the main imaging modality for surveillance and symptom evaluation, but contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) offers a useful alternative that avoids radiation and iodinated contrast material. CEUS is at least equivalent to CT for detecting endoleak and may be more sensitive. The authors provide a general protocol and technical considerations needed to perform CEUS of the abdominal aorta after endovascular stent repair. When there are no complications, the stent-graft lumen has homogeneous enhancement, and no contrast material is present in the aneurysm sac outside the stented lumen. In patients with an antegrade endoleak, contrast material is seen simultaneously in the aneurysm sac and stent-graft lumen, while delayed enhancement in the sac is due to retrograde leak. Recognition of artifacts and other potential pitfalls for CEUS studies is important for examination performance and interpretation. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren F Alexander
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - Cameron J Overfield
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - David M Sella
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - M Jennings Clingan
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - Young M Erben
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - Allie M Metcalfe
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - Michelle L Robbin
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| | - Melanie P Caserta
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.F.A., C.J.O., D.M.S., M.J.C., A.M.M., M.P.C.) and Vascular Surgery (Y.M.E.), Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; and Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (M.L.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monti CB, Righini P, Bonanno MC, Capra D, Mazzaccaro D, Giannetta M, Nicolino GM, Nano G, Sardanelli F, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Secchi F. Psoas Cross-Sectional Measurements Using Manual CT Segmentation before and after Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11144023. [PMID: 35887786 PMCID: PMC9325160 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcopenia has been associated with an increased incidence of adverse outcomes, including higher mortality, after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). We aim to use computed tomography (CT) to quantify changes in total psoas muscles area (PMA) and psoas muscle density (PMD) after EVAR, and to evaluate the reproducibility of both measurements. PMA and PMD were assessed via manual segmentation of the psoas muscle on pre- and post-operative CT scans belonging to consecutive patients who underwent EVAR. Wilcoxon test was used to compare PMA and PMD before and after EVAR, and inter- and intra-reader agreements of both methods were evaluated through Bland−Altman analysis. A total of 50 patients, 42 of them males (84%), were included in the study. PMA changes from 1243 mm2 (1006−1445 mm2) to 1102 mm2 (IQR 937−1331 mm2), after EVAR (p < 0.001). PMD did not vary between pre-EVAR (33 HU, IQR 26.5−38.7 HU) and post-EVAR (32 HU, IQR 26−37 HU, p = 0.630). At inter-reader Bland−Altman analysis, PMA showed a bias of 64.0 mm2 and a coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of 359.2 mm2, whereas PMD showed a bias of −2.43 HU and a CoR of 6.19 HU. At intra-reader Bland−Altman analysis, PMA showed a bias of −81.1 mm2 and a CoR of 394.6 mm2, whereas PMD showed a bias of 1.41 HU and a CoR of 6.36 HU. In conclusion, PMA decreases after EVAR. A good intra and inter-reader reproducibility was observed for both PMA and PMD. We thus propose to use PMA during the follow-up of patients who underwent EVAR to monitor muscle depletion after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Beatrice Monti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
| | - Paolo Righini
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy; (P.R.); (D.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Maria Chiara Bonanno
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
| | - Davide Capra
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
| | - Daniela Mazzaccaro
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy; (P.R.); (D.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Matteo Giannetta
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy; (P.R.); (D.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Gabriele Maria Nicolino
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, 20100 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Nano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy; (P.R.); (D.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Secchi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy; (C.B.M.); (M.C.B.); (D.C.); (G.N.); (F.S.)
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
EVAR Follow-Up with Ultrasound Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) Compared to CEUS and CT Angiography for Detection of Type II Endoleak. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020526. [PMID: 35204615 PMCID: PMC8871225 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and compared to computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a reference standard, for detection of type II endoleak during follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Between April 2017 and September 2020, 122 patients underwent post-EVAR follow-up with CTA at 3 months and with ultrasound SMI and CEUS at 4 months from the EVAR procedure. Aneurysmal sac diameter and graft patency were evaluated; endoleaks were assessed and classified. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated both for SMI and CEUS and compared to CTA. Furthermore, the percentage of agreement and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient were calculated. CTA revealed 54 type II endoleaks. Ultrasound SMI and CEUS presented the same sensitivity (91.5%), specificity (100%), positive (100%), and negative (92.8%) predictive and accuracy (95.9%) value for detecting type II endoleak. The same percentage of agreement of 94.9% was found between SMI/CEUS, and CTA with a Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of 0.89. The diagnostic accuracy of SMI is comparable with CEUS in the identification of type II endoleaks after EVAR. Since SMI is less invasive, less expensive, and less time-consuming, this method may be considered to be a potential tool for monitoring patients after EVAR implantation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gozzo C, Caruana G, Cannella R, Farina A, Giambelluca D, Dinoto E, Vernuccio F, Basile A, Midiri M. CT angiography for the assessment of EVAR complications: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:5. [PMID: 35032231 PMCID: PMC8761205 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01112-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive treatment proposed as an alternative to open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. EVAR consists in a stent-graft placement within the aorta in order to exclude the aneurysm from arterial circulation and reduce the risk of rupture. Knowledge of the various types of devices is mandatory because some stents/grafts are more frequently associated with complications. CT angiography is the gold standard diagnostic technique for preprocedural planning and postprocedural surveillance. EVAR needs long-term follow-up due to the high rate of complications. Complications can be divided in endograft device-related and systemic complications. The purpose of this article is to review the CT imaging findings of EVAR complications and the key features for the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Gozzo
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia". Catania, Italy, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Caruana
- Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology (IDI), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.,Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Arduino Farina
- Vascular Surgery Unit ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Dario Giambelluca
- Section of Radiology, Asp Siracusa, Ospedale Umberto I, Via Giuseppe Testaferrata 1, Siracusa, SR, Italy
| | - Ettore Dinoto
- Vascular Surgery Unit AOUP Policlinico 'P. Giaccone', Palermo, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Antonio Basile
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia". Catania, Italy, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Midiri
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kessler V, Klopf J, Eilenberg W, Neumayer C, Brostjan C. AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis. Biomedicines 2022; 10:94. [PMID: 35052774 PMCID: PMC8773452 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in many countries, the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to represent a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with an overall prevalence of about 2-3% in the industrialized world. While the risk of AAA development is considerably higher for men of advanced age with a history of smoking, screening programs serve to detect the often asymptomatic condition and prevent aortic rupture with an associated death rate of up to 80%. This review summarizes the current knowledge on identified risk factors, the multifactorial process of pathogenesis, as well as the latest advances in medical treatment and surgical repair to provide a perspective for AAA management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Christine Brostjan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (V.K.); (J.K.); (W.E.); (C.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Euler A, Taslimi T, Eberhard M, Kobe A, Reeve K, Zimmermann A, Krauss A, Gutjahr R, Schmidt B, Alkadhi H. Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta-Optimization of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection Settings to Reduce Radiation Dose or Contrast Medium in a Prospective Randomized Trial. Invest Radiol 2021; 56:283-291. [PMID: 33226202 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of low-kV protocols with optimized automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS) settings to reduce either radiation dose or contrast medium (CM) with that of a reference protocol for computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the thoracoabdominal aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial, 126 patients receiving CTA of the aorta were allocated to one of three computed tomography protocols: (A) reference protocol at 120 kVp and standard weight-adapted CM dose; (B) protocol at 90 kVp, reduced radiation and standard CM dose; and (C) protocol at 90 kVp, standard radiation and reduced CM dose. All three protocols were performed on a third-generation dual-source computed tomography scanner using the semimode of the ATVS system. The image-task-dependent optimization settings of the ATVS (slider level) were adjusted to level 11 (high-contrast task) for protocols A and B and level 3 (low-contrast task) for protocol C. Radiation dose parameters were assessed. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of protocols B and C were tested for noninferiority compared with A. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS Size-specific dose estimate was 34.3% lower for protocol B compared with A (P < 0.0001). Contrast medium was 20.2% lower for protocol C compared with A (P < 0.0001). Mean CNR in B and C was noninferior to protocol A (CNR of 30.2 ± 7, 33.4 ± 6.7, and 30.5 ± 8.9 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall subjective image quality among protocols (4.09 ± 0.21, 4.03 ± 0.19, and 4.08 ± 0.17 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS The slider settings of an ATVS system can be adjusted to optimize either radiation dose or CM at noninferior image quality in low-kV CTA of the aorta. This optimization could be used to extend future ATVS algorithms to take clinical risk factors like kidney function of individual patients into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Euler
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tilo Taslimi
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Eberhard
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Kobe
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kelly Reeve
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Zimmermann
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Hatem Alkadhi
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Contemporary imaging methods for the follow-up after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair: a review. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2019; 14:1-11. [PMID: 30766622 PMCID: PMC6372875 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.78973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized enlargement of the aortic cross-section where the diameter is greater than 3 cm or more than 50% larger than the diameter in a normal segment. The most important complication of AAA is rupture, which, if untreated, results in mortality rates of up to 90%. Conventional open surgical repair is associated with significant 30-day mortality. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a significantly less invasive procedure; it is related to a lower early mortality rate and a lower number of perioperative complications. Although EVAR is a minimally invasive technique, lifelong follow-up imaging is necessary due to possible late complications including endoleak, recurrent aneurysm formation, graft infection, migration, kinking and thrombosis. The total rate of complications after EVAR is estimated at approximately 30%, and the rate of complications that require intervention is 2–3%. Early detection and progression analysis of such situations is crucial for proper intervention.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bley T, Roos J. Pre- and Post-aortic Endovascular Interventions: What a Radiologist Needs to Know. IDKD SPRINGER SERIES 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11149-6_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|