In vivo anti-MUC1+ tumor activity and sequences of high-affinity anti-MUC1-SEA antibodies

The multifaceted role of MUC1 in tumor therapy resistance

Tumor therapeutic resistances are frequently linked to the recurrence and poor prognosis of cancers and have been a key bottleneck in clinical tumor treatment. Mucin1 (MUC1), a heterodimeric transmembrane glycoprotein, exhibits abnormally overexpression in a variety of human tumors and has been confirmed to be related to the formation of therapeutic resistance. In this review, the multifaceted roles of MUC1 in tumor therapy resistance are summarized from aspects of pan-cancer principles shared among therapies and individual mechanisms dependent on different therapies. Concretely, the common mechanisms of therapy resistance across cancers include interfering with gene expression, promoting genome instability, modifying tumor microenvironment, enhancing cancer heterogeneity and stemness, and activating evasion and metastasis. Moreover, the individual mechanisms of therapy resistance in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and biotherapy are introduced. Last but not least, MUC1-involved therapy resistance in different types of cancers and MUC1-related clinical trials are summarized.

The perception and influencing factors of astringency, and health-promoting effects associated with phytochemicals: A comprehensive review

Astringency as the complex sensory of drying or shrinking can be perceived from natural foods, including abundant phenolic compounds. Up to now, there have been two possible astringency perception mechanisms of phenolic compounds. The first possible mechanism involved chemosensors and mechanosensors and took salivary binding proteins as the premise. Although piecemeal reports about chemosensors, friction mechanosensor's perception mechanisms were absent. There might be another perception way because a part of astringent phenolic compounds also triggered astringency although they could not bind with salivary proteins, however, the specific mechanism was unclear. Structures caused the differences in astringency perception mechanisms and intensities. Except for structures, other influencing factors also changed astringency perception intensity and aimed to decrease it, which probably ignored the health-promoting effects of phenolic compounds. Therefore, we roundly summarized the chemosensor's perception processes of the first mechanism. Meanwhile, we speculated that friction mechanosensor's probably activated Piezo2 ion channel on cell membranes. Phenolic compounds directly binds with oral epithelial cells, activating Piezo2 ion channel probably the another astringency perception mechanism. Except for structure, the increase of pH values, ethanol concentrations, and viscosity not only lowered astringency perception but were beneficial to improve the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of astringent phenolic compounds, which contributed to stronger antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiaging and anticancer effects.

Therapeutic effect of a MUC1-specific monoclonal antibody-drug conjugates against pancreatic cancer model

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies without effective targeted therapies. MUC1 has emerged as a potential common target for cancer therapy because it is overexpressed in a variety of different cancers including the majority of pancreatic cancer. However, there are still no approved monoclonal antibody drugs targeting MUC1 have been reported. Recently, we generated a humanized MUC1 antibody (HzMUC1) specific to the interaction region between MUC1-N and MUC1-C. In this study, we generated the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) by conjugating HzMUC1 with monomethyl auristatin (MMAE), and examined the efficacy of HzMUC1-MMAE against the MUC1-positive pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Western blot and immunoprecipitation were used to detect MUC1 in pancreatic cancer cells. MUC1 localization in pancreatic cancer cells was determined by confocal microscopy. HzMUC1 was conjugated with the monomethyl auristatin (MMAE), generating the HzMUC1-MMAE ADC. Colony formation assay and flow cytometry were used to assess the effects of the HzMUC1-MMAE cell viability, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Capan-2 and CFPAC-1 xenograft model were used to test the efficacy of HzMUC1-MMAE against pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

HzMUC1 antibody binds to MUC1 on the cell surface of pancreatic cancer cells. HzMUC1-MMAE significantly inhibited cell growth by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Importantly, HzMUC1-MMAE significantly reduced the growth of pancreatic xenograft tumors by inhibiting cell proliferation and enhancing cell death.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that HzMUC1-ADC is a promising novel targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer. HzMUC1-ADC should also be an effective drug for the treatment of different MUC1-positive cancers.

Addiction of Cancer Stem Cells to MUC1-C in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Progression

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. TNBC progression is associated with expansion of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Few insights are available regarding druggable targets that drive the TNBC CSC state. This review summarizes the literature on TNBC CSCs and the compelling evidence that they are addicted to the MUC1-C transmembrane protein. In normal epithelia, MUC1-C is activated by loss of homeostasis and induces reversible wound-healing responses of inflammation and repair. However, in settings of chronic inflammation, MUC1-C promotes carcinogenesis. MUC1-C induces EMT, epigenetic reprogramming and chromatin remodeling in TNBC CSCs, which are dependent on MUC1-C for self-renewal and tumorigenicity. MUC1-C-induced lineage plasticity in TNBC CSCs confers DNA damage resistance and immune evasion by chronic activation of inflammatory pathways and global changes in chromatin architecture. Of therapeutic significance, an antibody generated against the MUC1-C extracellular domain has been advanced in a clinical trial of anti-MUC1-C CAR T cells and in IND-enabling studies for development as an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Agents targeting the MUC1-C cytoplasmic domain have also entered the clinic and are undergoing further development as candidates for advancing TNBC treatment. Eliminating TNBC CSCs will be necessary for curing this recalcitrant cancer and MUC1-C represents a promising druggable target for achieving that goal.

Advances in MUC1-Mediated Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Breast cancer (BRCA) is the leading cause of death from malignant tumors among women. Fortunately, however, immunotherapy has recently become a prospective BRCA treatment with encouraging achievements and mild safety profiles. Since the overexpression and aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 (human mucin) are closely associated with BRCA, it has become an ideal target for BRCA immunotherapies. In this review, the structure and function of MUC1 are briefly introduced, and the main research achievements in different kinds of MUC1-mediated BRCA immunotherapy are highlighted, from the laboratory to the clinic. Afterward, the future directions of MUC1-mediated BRCA immunotherapy are predicted, addressing, for example, urgent issues in regard to how efficient immunotherapeutic strategies can be generated.

Anti-cancer effects of pyrazole-platinum(II) complexes combined with anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody versus monotherapy in DLD-1 and HT-29 colon cancer cells

The membrane-bound MUC1 mucin is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in many epithelium origin cancers. One of the promising strategies in cancer therapy is combining monoclonal antibodies against cancer related antigens, like MUC1, with chemotherapeutics. In the study we evaluated the potency of cisplatin (cisPt), two pyrazole-platinum(II) complexes PtPz4, PtPz6, and anti-MUC1 mAb applied as monotherapy, as well as the chemotherapeutics administrated with antibody, towards apoptotic response and cancer-related carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) in DLD-1 and HT-29 colon cancer cells. To assess the impact of the tested compounds on the examined factors flow cytometry, RT-PCR, Western blotting and ELISA were utilized. The combined therapy was more potent than monotherapy towards Bcl-2, Bid, caspases and TACAs of both cell lines. Combined therapy applied in DLD-1 cells induced apoptosis, was more effective than monotherapy in relation to p53, Bcl-xL, Bax, and Bim. In HT-29 cells, anti-MUC1 administrated with the drugs was more potent than monotherapy towards Bad. The proposed anti-MUC1/cisPt and pyrazole-platinum(II) complexes PtPz4, PtPz6 combined therapy may be promising anti-colon cancer therapy.

A novel humanized MUC1 antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer

Mucin 1 (MUC1) has been regarded as an ideal target for cancer treatment, since it is overexpressed in a variety of different cancers including the majority of breast cancer. However, there are still no approved monoclonal antibody drugs targeting MUC1. In this study, we generated a humanized MUC1 (HzMUC1) antibody from our previously developed MUC1 mouse monoclonal antibody that only recognizes MUC1 on the surface of tumor cells. Furthermore, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was generated by conjugating HzMUC1 with monomethyl auristatin (MMAE), and the efficacy of HzMUC1-MMAE on the MUC1-positive HER2+ breast cancer in vitro and in 'Xenograft' model was tested. Results from western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation revealed that the HzMUC1 antibody did not recognize cell-free MUC1-N in sera from breast cancer patients. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that HzMUC1 antibody bound to MUC1 on the surface of breast cancer cells. Results from mapping experiments suggested that HzMUC1 may recognize an epitope present in the interaction region between MUC1-N and MUC1-C. Results from colony formation assay and flow cytometry demonstrated that HzMUC1-MMAE significantly inhibited cell growth by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Meanwhile, HzMUC1-MMAE significantly reduced the growth of HCC1954 xenograft tumors by inhibiting cell proliferation and enhancing cell death. In conclusion, our results indicate that HzMUC1-ADC is a novel therapeutic drug that can overcome trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer. HzMUC1-ADC should also be an effective therapeutic drug for the treatment of different MUC1-positive cancers in clinic.

Anti-cancer effect of combined action of anti-MUC1 and rosmarinic acid in AGS gastric cancer cells

MUC1 seems to be promising target in cancer cells due to its abundant and specifically altered expression as well as differential distribution pattern relative to normal tissues. Rosmarinic acid (RA) is a natural, polyphenolic compound with pharmacological activities, including anti-cancer. Herein, we aim to explore the effect of combined action of anti-MUC1 and RA on selected cancer-related factors in AGS gastric cancer cells. Cancer cells were treated with 100, 200 μM rosmarinic acid, 5 μg/ml anti-MUC1 and acid together with antibody. Western blotting, ELISA and RT-PCR were used to assess the expression of MUC1, selected sugar antigens, enzymes participating in protein glycosylation, Gal-3, p53, pro- and anti-apoptotic factors, and caspases-3,-8,-9 in cancer cells. MUC1 mRNA was significantly suppressed by combined action of anti-MUC1 and RA. Such treatment markedly inhibited expression of cancer-related Tn, T, sialyl Tn, sialyl T, and fucosylated sugar antigens as well as mRNA expression of enzymes participating in their formation: ppGalNAcT2, C1GalT1, ST6GalNAcT2, ST3GalT1 and FUT4. C1GalT1 was suppressed also on protein level. Gal-3, factor likely participating in metastasis, was significantly suppressed on mRNA level by RA administrated with anti-MUC1. Pro-apoptotic Bax protein and Bad mRNA were significantly induced, and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 mRNA expression was inhibited by such treatment. Combined action of mAb and RA markedly increased caspase-9 mRNA expression. Results of the study indicate that combined action of anti-MUC1 and RA is more effective than monotherapy in relation to examined cancer related factors. Such treatment can be considered as new, promising strategy in gastric cancer therapy.

Combined Action of Anti-MUC1 Monoclonal Antibody and Pyrazole-Platinum(II) Complexes Reveals Higher Effectiveness towards Apoptotic Response in Comparison with Monotherapy in AGS Gastric Cancer Cells

MUC1 mucin is a transmembrane glycoprotein aberrantly overexpressed and underglycosylated in most epithelium origin cancers. Combining chemotherapeutics with monoclonal antibodies toward cancer-related antigens is one of the new strategies in cancer therapies. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of 10 μM cisplatin (cisPt), two pyrazole-platinum(II) complexes (PtPz4 and PtPz6), and 5 μg/mL anti-MUC1 used as monotherapy, as well as cisplatin and its derivatives combined with mAb on apoptotic response and specific cancer-related sugar antigens in AGS gastric cancer cells. Flow cytometry, RT-PCR, Western blotting, and ELISA tests were applied to determine the influence of examined compounds on analyzed factors. PtPz6 combined with anti-MUC1 revealed the strongest apoptotic response compared to control and monotherapy. The combined action of both cisPt derivatives and anti-MUC1 was more effective than monotherapy in relation to Bad, Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, caspase-9, caspase-3, as well as pro- and cleaved caspase-3 protein, and T, sialyl Tn sugar antigens in cell lysates, and Tn, T, sialyl Tn, sialyl T antigens in culture medium. Additionally, PtPz4 administrated with mAb was revealed to be more potent than used alone with regard to Bax protein and Bid expression, and PtPz6 used in complex with anti-MUC1 revealed more efficient action towards Akt and sialyl T antigen expression. These data indicate the rationality of the potential application of combined treatment of anti-MUC1 and cisPt derivatives in gastric cancer therapy.

Mucins as anti-cancer targets: perspectives of the glycobiologist

Mucins are highly O-glycosylated glycoproteins that carry a heterogenous variety of O-glycan structures. Tumor cells tend to overexpress specific mucins, such as the cell surface mucins MUC1 and MUC4 that are engaged in signaling and cell growth, and exhibit abnormal glycosylation. In particular, the Tn and T antigens and their sialylated forms are common in cancer mucins. We review herein methods chosen to use cancer-associated glycans and mucins as targets for the design of anti-cancer immunotherapies. Mucin peptides from the glycosylated and transmembrane domains have been combined with immune-stimulating adjuvants in a wide variety of approaches to produce anti-tumor antibodies and vaccines. These mucin conjugates have been tested on cancer cells in vitro and in mice with significant successes in stimulating anti-tumor responses. The clinical trials in humans, however, have shown limited success in extending survival. It seems critical that the individual-specific epitope expression of cancer mucins is considered in future therapies to result in lasting anti-tumor responses.

Knockdown of lncRNA ABHD11-AS1 Suppresses the Tumorigenesis of Pancreatic Cancer via Sponging miR-1231

Background

Pancreatic cancer ranks first among the most aggressive malignancies. Long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) ABHD11-AS1 is known to be upregulated in pancreatic cancer. However, the mechanism by which ABHD11-AS1 mediates the tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer remains unclear.

Methods

Gene and protein expressions in pancreatic cancer cells were detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. Cell viability was measured by CCK-8 assay. Cell apoptosis and cycle were tested by flow cytometry. In addition, cell migration and invasion were tested by wound healing and transwell assay, respectively. The correlation between ABHD11-AS1, miR-1231 and cyclin E1 was confirmed by dual-luciferase report and RNA pull-down. Finally, xenograft mice model was established to investigate the role of ABDH-AS1 in pancreatic cancer in vivo.

Results

ABHD11-AS1 was found to be negatively correlated with the survival rate of patients with pancreatic cancer. ABHD11-AS1 silencing significantly inhibited the proliferation and induced the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells. Additionally, knockdown of ABHD11-AS1 greatly inhibited the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Meanwhile, ABHD11-AS1 bound to miR-1231 and cyclin E1 was found to be the target of miR-1231. Moreover, ABHD11-AS1 knockdown-induced G1 arrest in pancreatic cancer cells was reversed by miR-1231 antagomir. Finally, knockdown of ABHD11-AS1 obviously inhibited the tumor growth of pancreatic cancer in vivo.

Conclusion

ABHD11-AS1 silencing significantly inhibited the tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo. Thus, ABHD11-AS1 may serve as a potential target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.