1
|
Nesbitt C, Van Der Walt A, Butzkueven H, Devitt B, Jokubaitis VG. Multiple sclerosis and cancer: Navigating a dual diagnosis. Mult Scler 2024:13524585241274523. [PMID: 39347791 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241274523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Healthcare breakthroughs are extending the lives of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and cancer survivors, creating a growing cohort of individuals navigating a dual diagnosis. Determining the relationship between MS and cancer risk remains challenging, with inconclusive findings confounded by age, risk exposures, comorbidities, genetics and the ongoing introduction of new MS disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) across study periods.This research places significant emphasis on cancer survival, with less attention given to the impact on MS outcomes. Our review explores the existing literature on MS, cancer risk and the intersection of DMTs and cancer treatments. We aim to navigate the complexities of managing MS in cancer survivors to optimise outcomes for both conditions. Continuous research and the formulation of treatment guidelines are essential for guiding future care. Collaboration between neuro-immunology and oncology is crucial, with a need to establish databases for retrospective and ultimately prospective analysis of outcomes in these rapidly evolving fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassie Nesbitt
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, MSNI Multiple Sclerosis and Neuro-Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anneke Van Der Walt
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, MSNI Multiple Sclerosis and Neuro-Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, MSNI Multiple Sclerosis and Neuro-Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bianca Devitt
- Department of Oncology, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vilija G Jokubaitis
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, MSNI Multiple Sclerosis and Neuro-Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aoun R, Gratch D, Kaminetzky D, Kister I. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Pre-existing Neurologic Autoimmune Disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:735-750. [PMID: 37870664 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01306-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for oncologic indications is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases are at increased risk of irAEs and have largely been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs. Therefore, there is limited data on the safety of safety of ICIs in patients with pre-existing neurologic autoimmune diseases (nAIDs) such as myasthenia gravis and multiple sclerosis. This review aims to synthesize the literature on the post-marketing experience with ICI in patients with pre-existing nAID and to discuss possible strategies for mitigating the risk of post-ICI nAID relapses. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with pre-existing myasthenia gravis (MG), myositis, and paraneoplastic encephalitis appear highly susceptible to neurologic relapses of their underlying neurologic disorder following ICI initiation; these relapses can cause considerable morbidity and mortality. In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the risk and severity of MS relapses following ICI appears to be relatively lower compared to MG. Preliminary evidence suggests that older MS patients with no recent focal neuroinflammatory activity may be safely treated with ICI. Among the several case reports of ICI in patients with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), neurologic worsening was only recorded in one patient who was in the acute phase of GBS at the time of ICI start. Initiating an ICI in a patient with pre-existing nAID involves a complex risk-benefit discussion between the patient, their oncologist, and neurologist. Relevant issues to consider before ICI include the choice of disease-modifying therapy for nAID (if any) and strategies for promptly identifying and managing nAID relapses should they occur. Currently, the literature consists mainly of case reports and case series, subject to publication bias. Prospective studies of ICI in patients with nAID are needed to improve the level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raissa Aoun
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Daniel Gratch
- Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - David Kaminetzky
- Department of Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Ilya Kister
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 240 East 38th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Živković SA, Al-Lahham T. Neurologic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Neurology 2022. [DOI: 10.17925/usn.2022.18.1.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical use of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the management of cancer and added another effective treatment option for different types of malignancies. The blockade of immune checkpoint pathways triggers an enhanced immune response leading to cancer regression but may also lead to autoimmune toxicities or immune-related adverse events, which may involve skin, endocrine, respiratory, gastrointestinal or neurologic manifestations. Clinically relevant neurologic complications involving the central and/or peripheral nervous system affect up to 1% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Common neurologic complications include aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, hypophysitis, myasthenia, myositis and neuropathies. Neurologic immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibition should be distinguished from cancer progression or other complications of cancer therapy (e.g. infections). The treatment of neurologic complications may include holding or withdrawing cancer immunotherapy, anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapies with corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents, immunomodulation with intravenous immune globulin or plasmapheresis and symptomatic treatment (e.g. antiepileptic medications, pain medications).
Collapse
|