Efficacy of immunotherapy beyond RECIST progression in advanced melanoma: a real-world evidence

Comprehensive analysis of single cell and bulk RNA sequencing reveals the heterogeneity of melanoma tumor microenvironment and predicts the response of immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Tumor microenvironment (TME) heterogeneity is an important factor affecting the treatment response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, the TME heterogeneity of melanoma is still widely characterized.

METHODS

We downloaded the single-cell sequencing data sets of two melanoma patients from the GEO database, and used the "Scissor" algorithm and the "BayesPrism" algorithm to comprehensively analyze the characteristics of microenvironment cells based on single-cell and bulk RNA-seq data. The prediction model of immunotherapy response was constructed by machine learning and verified in three cohorts of GEO database.

RESULTS

We identified seven cell types. In the Scissor+ subtype cell population, the top three were T cells, B cells and melanoma cells. In the Scissor- subtype, there are more macrophages. By quantifying the characteristics of TME, significant differences in B cells between responders and non-responders were observed. The higher the proportion of B cells, the better the prognosis. At the same time, macrophages in the non-responsive group increased significantly. Finally, nine gene features for predicting ICI response were constructed, and their predictive performance was superior in three external validation groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the heterogeneity of melanoma TME and found a new predictive biomarker, which provided theoretical support and new insights for precise immunotherapy of melanoma patients.

Time to strategy failure and treatment beyond progression in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab: post-hoc analysis of the Meet-URO 15 study

Background

Immunotherapies exhibit peculiar cancer response patterns in contrast to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Some patients experience disease response after initial progression or durable responses after treatment interruption. In clinical practice, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be continued after radiological progression if clinical benefit is observed. As a result, estimating progression-free survival (PFS) based on the first disease progression may not accurately reflect the actual benefit of immunotherapy.

Methods

The Meet-URO 15 study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 571 pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab. Time to strategy failure (TSF) was defined as the interval from the start of immunotherapy to definitive disease progression or death. This post-hoc analysis compared TSF to PFS and assess the response and survival outcomes between patients treatated beyond progression (TBP) and non-TBP. Moreover, we evaluated the prognostic accuracy of the Meet-URO score versus the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score based on TSF and PFS.

Results

Overall, 571 mRCC patients were included in the analysis. Median TSF was 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.0 - 10.1), while mPFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.7 - 8.5). TBP patients (N = 93) had significantly longer TSF (16.3 vs 5.5 months; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (34.8 vs 17.9 months; p < 0.001) but similar PFS compared to non-TBP patients. In TBP patients, a median delay of 9.6 months (range: 6.7-16.3) from the first to the definitive disease progression was observed, whereas non-TBP patients had overlapped median TSF and PFS (5.5 months). Moreover, TBP patients had a trend toward a higher overall response rate (33.3% vs 24.3%; p = 0.075) and disease control rate (61.3% vs 55.5%; p = 0.31). Finally, in the whole population the Meet-URO score outperformed the IMDC score in predicting both TSF (c-index: 0.63 vs 0.59) and PFS (0.62 vs 0.59).

Conclusion

We found a 2-month difference between mTSF and mPFS in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab. However, TBP patients had better outcomes, including significantly longer TSF and OS than non-TBP patients. The Meet-URO score is a reliable predictor of TSF and PFS.

Radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: efficacy and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) is primarily considered as a palliative treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, observations suggest that when RT is combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it can induce an immune response leading to an anti-tumoral effect also distant from the irradiated area - a phenomenon called 'abscopal effect'. The frequency and circumstances of abscopal effect among metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain and further research is necessary.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This retrospective study included all metastatic melanoma patients who received non-stereotactic RT in Stockholm, Sweden in 2015-2020. Patients were grouped depending on if RT was given at start of ICI (RT + ICI(start)), at ICI progression (RT + ICI(salvage)) or without ICI (RT(only)). Response rates in irradiated (RR(irradiated)) and overall response rates in non-irradiated (ORR(non-irradiated)) metastases were evaluated together with survival and toxicity in each cohort.

RESULTS

In the RT + ICI(start) (n = 47), RT + ICI(salvage) (n = 41) and RT(only) (n = 55) cohorts, RR(irradiated) was 70.7%, 67.5% and 43.1% (p = 0.018) while the ORR(non-irradiated) was 36.1%, 14.8% and 0.0% (p = 0.003), and the median overall survival was 18.2, 15.0 and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Local response to RT was in all cohorts associated with longer survival (p < 0.001). The frequency of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 17.0% and 19.5% in the RT + ICI(start) and RT + ICI(salvage) cohorts. No increased frequency of RT-related adverse events was seen in the RT + ICI cohorts, compared to the RT(only) cohort.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study showed that melanoma patients receiving RT in combination with ICI had a superior antitumoral response in both irradiated and non-irradiated lesions as compared to patients receiving only RT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients receiving RT when progressing on ICI experienced tumor regression also in non-irradiated areas.

The benefit of treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Treatment beyond progression (TBP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an evolving field due to the limitations of conventional imaging in response evaluation. However, real-life data on the benefit of TBP is scarce, especially from the limited resource settings and patients treated in the later lines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the survival benefit of TBP with ICIs in patients with advanced tumors from a limited resource setting.

METHODS

For this multi-center retrospective cohort study, we included 282 patients treated with ICIs and had radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. We evaluated post-progression survival according to the use of TBP (TBP and non-TBP groups) with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The cohort's median age was 61, and 84.4% were treated in the second or later lines. 82 (29.1%) of 282 patients continued on ICIs following the initial progression. In multivariate analyses, patients in the TBP group had improved post-progression survival compared to non-TBP (13.18 vs. 4.63 months, HR: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.349-0.717, p < 0.001). The benefit of the TBP was independent of the tumor type, treatment line, and age. Furthermore, TBP with ICIs remained associated with improved post-progression survival (HR: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.380-0.947, p = 0.028) after excluding the patients with no further treatment after progression in the non-TBP arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that patients receiving ICIs beyond progression had considerably longer survival. Continuation of ICIs after progression should be considered a reasonable management option for patients with advanced cancer, specifically for patients with limited alternative options.

Long Term Results and Prognostic Biomarkers for Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy Used after BRAFi/MEKi Combination in Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma Patients

(1) Background: BRAFi/MEKi are usually offered as a first line treatment for patients requiring rapid response; with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, large tumor burden, and with brain metastases. The efficacy of second line therapies after BRAFi/MEKI failure is now well defined. (2) Methods: Patients treated with first line target BRAFi/MEKi therapy (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, dabrafenib plus trametinib or encorafenib plus binimetinib); and for the second line treatment immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) with at least one cycle of second line were analyzed for survival and prognostic biomarkers. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the treatment groups with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as median progression free-survival (PSF) and overall survival (OS) since the initiation of second line therapy; on nivolumab OS was 6.6 months, and on pembrolizumab 5.0 months. The greatest clinical benefit with second line immunotherapy was observed in patients with LDH ≤ ULN and <3 organ sites with metastasis at baseline. Longer OS was also noted in patients with time to PD  >6 months in first line (slow progression). (4) Conclusions: Second line anti-PD1 immunotherapy is effective in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients after BRAFi/MEKi therapy failure.

Long-Term Outcomes of Targeted Therapy after First-Line Immunotherapy in BRAF-Mutated Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma Patients—Real-World Evidence

Background: Currently, limited data on targeted therapy and immunotherapy sequencing in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma is available. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are expected to be comparable in terms of overall survival (OS) when used as second-line therapies; therefore, understanding the characteristics of patients who completed sequential treatment is needed. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of BRAFi/MEKi activity as second-line therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. We also aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated sequentially with immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We enrolled 97 patients treated between 1st December 2015 and 31st December 2020 with first-line immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors; and for the second-line treatment with at least one cycle of BRAFi/MEKi therapy with follow-up through 31 January 2022. Results: Median OS since first-line treatment initiation was 19.9 months and 12.8 months since initiation of BRAFi/MEKi treatment. All BRAFi/MRKi combinations were similarly effective. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months since initiation of any BRAFi/MEKi treatment. Conclusions: BRAFi/MEKi therapy is effective in the second-line in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients. For the first time, the efficacy of all BRAFi/MEKi combinations as second-line therapy is shown.

Immune-Related Thyroid Adverse Events Predict Response to PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Melanoma

Simple Summary

We evaluated the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy in terms of their influence on overall survival (OS) rates in melanoma. Based on data from 249 patients with metastatic melanoma and a normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at baseline, we found that during anti-PD-1 therapy, 95 patients had a TSH outside normal ranges (32 had clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism). The 3-year OS rates in patients with clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal but clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis were 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively. After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29–0.87).

Abstract

Antibodies against programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) are a standard of care in melanoma; however, this treatment may cause immune-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy and analyze their influence on the overall survival rates in melanoma. We included 249 patients with metastatic melanoma treated in our institution between 2014 and 2021; the median age was 62 years (range: 17–90); 58% were males, and 37% of patients had the BRAF mutation. We included patients with a normal TSH at baseline and followed up with measurement of TSH levels during immunotherapy. In our group, 95 patients had a TSH outside the normal range: 63 not clinically significant and 32 with clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism. The 3-year overall survival rate was related to the irTAEs of clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis at 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively (p = 0.002). After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29–0.87). In conclusion, the patients who developed clinically significant hypothyroidism requiring replacement therapy with L-thyroxin were the group who benefitted most from anti-PD-1 treatment.