1
|
Erdat EC, Yalciner M, Urun Y. Accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence chatbot generated chemotherapy protocols. Future Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38646965 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Medical practitioners are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for easier and faster access to information. To our knowledge, the accuracy and availability of AI-generated chemotherapy protocols has not yet been studied. Methods: Nine simulated cancer patient cases were designed and AI chatbots, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) and Bing (Microsoft), were used to generate chemotherapy protocols for each case. Results: Generated chemotherapy protocols were compared with the original protocols for nine simulated cancer patients. ChatGPT's overall performance was 5 out of 9 on protocol generation, and Bing's was 4 out of 9; this was statistically nonsignificant (p = 1). Conclusion: AI chatbots show both potential and limitations in generating chemotherapy protocols. The overall performance is low, and they should be used carefully in oncological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efe Cem Erdat
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Merih Yalciner
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yasar HA, Aktas BY, Ucar G, Goksu SS, Bilgetekin I, Cakar B, Sakin A, Ates O, Basoglu T, Arslan C, Demiray AG, Paydas S, Cicin I, Sendur MAN, Karadurmus N, Kosku H, Uner A, Yumuk PF, Utkan G, Kefeli U, Tanriverdi O, Cinkir H, Gumusay O, Turhal NS, Menekse S, Kut E, Beypinar I, Sakalar T, Demir H, Yekeduz E, Kilickap S, Erman M, Urun Y. Adrenocortical Cancer in the Real World: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Features and Management from the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102077. [PMID: 38626660 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare yet highly malignant tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to delineate the clinical features, survival patterns, and treatment modalities of ACC, providing insights into the disease's prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of 157 ACC patients was performed to assess treatment methodologies, demographic patterns, pathological and clinical attributes, and laboratory results. The data were extracted from the hospital's database. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with univariate and multivariate analyses being performed through the log-rank test and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The median age was 45, and 89.4% had symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The median tumor size was 12 cm. A total of 117 (79.6%) patients underwent surgery. A positive surgical border was detected in 26 (24.1%) patients. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 44.4% of patients. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 44.3 months. Median OS was found to be 87.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4-100.2) in stage 2, 25.8 (95% CI 6.5-45.1) months in stage 3, and 13.3 (95% CI 7.0-19.6) months in stage 4 disease. Cox regression analysis identified age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as significant factors associated with survival in patients with nonmetastatic disease. In metastatic disease, only patients who underwent surgery exhibited significantly improved overall survival in univariate analyses. CONCLUSION ACC is an uncommon tumor with a generally poor prognosis. Understanding the defining prognostic factors in both localized and metastatic diseases is vital. This study underscores age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as key prognostic determinants for localized disease, offering critical insights into the complexities of ACC management and potential avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gokhan Ucar
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Medical Oncology Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Cakar
- Medical Oncology Department, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Sakin
- Medical Oncology Department, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey
| | - Ozturk Ates
- Medical Oncology Department, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tugba Basoglu
- Medical Oncology Department, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cagatay Arslan
- Medical Oncology Department, Bahcesehir University, MedicalPark Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Semra Paydas
- Medical Oncology Department, Adana Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Medical Oncology Department, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | | | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Medical Oncology Department, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Kosku
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aytuğ Uner
- Medical Oncology Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Perran Fulden Yumuk
- Medical Oncology Department, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey; Medical Oncology Department, Koç University, Istanbul; Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Kefeli
- Medical Oncology Department, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Tanriverdi
- Medical Oncology Department, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Havva Cinkir
- Medical Oncology Department, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Ozge Gumusay
- Medical Oncology Department, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
| | | | - Serkan Menekse
- Medical Oncology Department, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Engin Kut
- Medical Oncology Department, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ismail Beypinar
- Medical Oncology Department, Afyon Health Sciences University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - Teoman Sakalar
- Medical Oncology Department, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey
| | - Hacer Demir
- Medical Oncology Department, Afyon Health Sciences University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - Emre Yekeduz
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Mustafa Erman
- Medical Oncology Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guven DC, Aykan MB, Muglu H, Bayram E, Helvaci K, Dursun B, Celayir M, Chelebiyev E, Nayir E, Erman M, Sezer A, Urun Y, Demirci U, Er O, Disel U, Bilici A, Arslan C, Karadurmus N, Kilickap S. The efficacy of immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in patients with advanced rare tumors: A Turkish oncology group (TOG) study. Cancer Med 2023; 13:e6869. [PMID: 38140782 PMCID: PMC10809296 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were relatively slow in rare tumors. Therefore, we conducted a multi-center study evaluating the efficacy of ICI monotherapy and the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced rare tumors. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included 93 patients treated with ICIs for NCI-defined rare tumors from the 12 cancer centers in Turkey. The primary endpoints were the overall response (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS The cohort's median age was 56, and 53.8% of the patients were male. The most frequent diagnosis was sarcoma (29%), and 81.7% of the patients were previously treated with at least one line of systemic therapy in the advanced stage. The ORR and DCR were 36.8% and 63.2%, respectively. The germ cell tumors had the lowest ORR (0%), while the Merkel cell carcinoma had the highest ORR to ICIs (57.1%). Patients treated with ICI + ICI or ICI plus chemotherapy combinations had higher ORR (55.2% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.012) and DCR (82.8% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.008). The median OS was 13.47 (95% CI: 7.79-19.15) months, and the six and 12-month survival rates were 71% and 52%. The median duration of response was 16.59 months, and the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 66% in responders. The median time-to-treatment failure was 5.06 months (95% CI: 3.42-6.71). Three patients had high-grade irAEs with ICIs (grade 3 colitis, grade 3 gastritis, and grade 3 encephalitis in one patient each). CONCLUSION We observed over 30% ORR and a 13-month median OS in patients with rare cancers treated with ICI monotherapy or ICI plus CT combinations. The response rates to ICIs or ICIs plus CT significantly varied across different tumor types. Responding patients had over 2 years of survival, highlighting a need for further trials with ICIs for patients with rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical OncologyHacettepe University Cancer InstituteAnkaraTurkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical OncologyGulhane School of Medicine, University of Health SciencesAnkaraTurkey
| | - Harun Muglu
- Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
| | - Ertugrul Bayram
- Department of Medical OncologyCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
| | | | - Bengü Dursun
- Department of Medical OncologyAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - Melisa Celayir
- Department of Medical OncologyMAA Acıbadem UniversityİstanbulTurkey
| | - Elvin Chelebiyev
- Department of Medical OncologyHacettepe University Cancer InstituteAnkaraTurkey
| | - Erdinc Nayir
- Department of Medical OncologyMersin Medical Park HospitalMersinTurkey
| | - Mustafa Erman
- Department of Medical OncologyHacettepe University Cancer InstituteAnkaraTurkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Baskent University Adana HospitalAdanaTurkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical OncologyAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | | | - Ozlem Er
- Department of Medical OncologyMAA Acıbadem UniversityİstanbulTurkey
| | - Umut Disel
- Department of Medical OncologyAcibadem Adana HospitalAdanaTurkey
| | - Ahmet Bilici
- Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
| | - Cagatay Arslan
- Department of Medical OncologySchool of Medicine, Medical Park Hospital, Izmir Economy UniversityIzmirTurkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical OncologyGulhane School of Medicine, University of Health SciencesAnkaraTurkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Department of Medical OncologyIstinye University Faculty of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aydin SG, Kavak EE, Topcu A, Bayramgil A, Akgul F, Kahraman S, Aykan MB, Altıntas YE, Helvaci K, Urun Y, Bilici A, Seker M, Nahit Sendur MA, Olmez OF, Acikgoz O, Cicin I. Prognostic factors for regorafenib treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-life retrospective multi-center study. Biomol Biomed 2023; 23:1089-1095. [PMID: 37289436 PMCID: PMC10655877 DOI: 10.17305/bb.2023.9253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have progressed on standard therapies. Our study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors influencing regorafenib treatment and assess the optimal dosing regimen in a real-life setting. We retrospectively analysed 263 patients with mCRC from multiple medical oncology clinics in Turkey. Treatment responses and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Of the patients, 120 were male, and 143 were female; 28.9% of tumors were located in the rectum. RAS mutations were present in 3.0% of tumors, while BRAF, K-RAS, and N-RAS mutations were found in 3.0%, 29.7%, and 25.9% of tumor tissues, respectively. Dose escalation was preferred in 105 (39.9%) patients. The median treatment duration was 3.0 months, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 4.9%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity occurred in 133 patients, leading to discontinuation, interruption, and modification rates of 50.6%, 43.7%, and 79.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.0 and 8.1 months, respectively. RAS/RAF mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3; P = 0.01), pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3; P = 0.008), and toxicity-related treatment interruption or dose adjustment (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; P = 0.01) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Dose escalation had no significant effect on PFS but was associated with improved OS (P < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for OS were the initial TNM stage (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.9; P = 0.04) and dose interruption/adjustment (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P = 0.03). Our findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib. Treatment line influences the response, with dose escalation being more favorable than adjustment or interruption, thus impacting survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Goktas Aydin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Engin Eren Kavak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Atakan Topcu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayberk Bayramgil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fahri Akgul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Seda Kahraman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yunus Emre Altıntas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kaan Helvaci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bilici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mesut Seker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omer Fatih Olmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Acikgoz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guven DC, Yekeduz E, Erul E, Yazgan SC, Sahin TK, Karatas G, Aksoy S, Erman M, Yalcin S, Urun Y, Kilickap S. The benefit of treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:3599-3606. [PMID: 35960374 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04268-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment beyond progression (TBP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an evolving field due to the limitations of conventional imaging in response evaluation. However, real-life data on the benefit of TBP is scarce, especially from the limited resource settings and patients treated in the later lines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the survival benefit of TBP with ICIs in patients with advanced tumors from a limited resource setting. METHODS For this multi-center retrospective cohort study, we included 282 patients treated with ICIs and had radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. We evaluated post-progression survival according to the use of TBP (TBP and non-TBP groups) with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The cohort's median age was 61, and 84.4% were treated in the second or later lines. 82 (29.1%) of 282 patients continued on ICIs following the initial progression. In multivariate analyses, patients in the TBP group had improved post-progression survival compared to non-TBP (13.18 vs. 4.63 months, HR: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.349-0.717, p < 0.001). The benefit of the TBP was independent of the tumor type, treatment line, and age. Furthermore, TBP with ICIs remained associated with improved post-progression survival (HR: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.380-0.947, p = 0.028) after excluding the patients with no further treatment after progression in the non-TBP arm. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that patients receiving ICIs beyond progression had considerably longer survival. Continuation of ICIs after progression should be considered a reasonable management option for patients with advanced cancer, specifically for patients with limited alternative options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Emre Yekeduz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Enes Erul
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sati Coskun Yazgan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taha Koray Sahin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokturk Karatas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Erman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Suayib Yalcin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Medical Oncology Unit, Liv Hospital Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hacioglu MB, Erdogan B, Bardakcı M, Algın E, Gulbagcı B, Hacibekiroglu I, Hamdard J, Olmez OF, Akkus H, Oksuzoglu B, Goksu SS, Dae SA, Sumbul AT, Ugraklı M, Karaagac M, Sahin E, Cabuk D, Ozer O, Yavuzsen T, Arıkan R, Köstek O, Atcı MM, Sakin A, Deligonul A, Bayır D, Dincer M, Unsal O, Yazıcı O, Zeynelgil E, Gulmez A, Harputluoglu H, Erol C, Sendur MAN, Aytekin A, Akagunduz B, Oner I, Er O, Oztosun B, Gumus M, Biricik FS, Aykan MB, Karadurmus N, Degerli E, Demirci NS, Turkmen E, Şakalar T, Secmeler S, Tanrıverdi O, Alkan A, Kemal Y, Cil I, Unal C, Iriagaç Y, Alan O, Balli S, Urun Y, Ozcan E, Turhal NS, Cicin I. Major and minor salivary gland cancers: A multicenter retrospective study. Head Neck 2023. [PMID: 37084179 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most of the studies on salivary gland cancers are limited for various reasons such as being single-center, small number of patients, including only major or minor SGCs, or only including epidemiological data. METHODS A total of 37 medical oncology clinics from different regions of Turkey participated in this retrospective-multicenter study. The analyzed data included clinical and demographical features, primary treatment, metastasis localizations, and treatments and includes certain pathologic features. RESULTS The study included data from a total of 443 SGCs. 56.7% was in major salivary glands and 43.3% was in minor salivary glands. Distant metastasis in the major SGCs was statistically significantly more common than in the minor SGCs, locoregional recurrence was statistically significantly more common in the minor SGCs than in the major SGCs (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Epidemiological information, metastasis and recurrence patterns, treatment modalities, and survival analysis of the patients over 20 years of follow-up are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bulent Erdogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Murat Bardakcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Efnan Algın
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Gulbagcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Ilhan Hacibekiroglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Jamshid Hamdard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Omer Fatih Olmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hadi Akkus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sema Sezgin Goksu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Shute Ailia Dae
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Adana Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Taner Sumbul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Adana Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Ugraklı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Karaagac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Elif Sahin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Devrim Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Ozden Ozer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Tugba Yavuzsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Rukiye Arıkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Osman Köstek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Mustafa Atcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Sakin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adem Deligonul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Duygu Bayır
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Murat Dincer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Oktay Unsal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Yazıcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Zeynelgil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Diskapi Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Gulmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Hakan Harputluoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Cihan Erol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aydin Aytekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Baran Akagunduz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mengucek Gazi Education and Research Hospital, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey
| | - Irem Oner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Er
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maslak Hospital, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bugra Oztosun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Goztepe Education and Research Hospital, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Gumus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Goztepe Education and Research Hospital, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Degerli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cerrahpasa University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nebi Serkan Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cerrahpasa University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esma Turkmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Derince Education and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Teoman Şakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaras Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - Saban Secmeler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Education and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Tanrıverdi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Ali Alkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Kemal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Altınbas University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Cil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Caglar Unal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yakup Iriagaç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Ozkan Alan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tekirdag City Hospital, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Sevinc Balli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erkan Ozcan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | | | - Irfan Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goktas Aydin S, Cakan Demirel B, Bilici A, Topcu A, Aykan MB, Kahraman S, Akbıyık I, Atci MM, Olmez OF, Yaren A, Sendur MAN, Geredeli C, Seker M, Urun Y, Karadurmus N, Aydin A. Real-life analysis of treatment approaches and the role of inflammatory markers on survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1751-1758. [PMID: 35916475 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2108619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advanced-stage biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. There are few prospective trials, but several retrospective studies regarding treatment options. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammatory parameters (SIP) and other possible independent factors that may affect survival and treatment approaches and to determine the benefit of later-line treatments in these patients. METHODS A total of 284 patients, initially diagnosed with advanced stage or progressed after curative treatment of BTC, from different oncology centers in Turkey were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, SIPs and treatment options was analyzed. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI:5.51-6.82), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-19.6). Treatment choice (p < .001 HR:0.70 CI95% 0.55-0.9), performance status (p < .001 HR:2.74 CI 95% 2.12-3.54) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = .02 HR:1.38 CI 95% 1.03-1.84) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the independent prognostic indicators were determined as The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (p < .001 HR:1.78 CI 95% 1.5-2.3), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) (p < .001 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.36-0.73) and stage at diagnosis (p = .002 HR:1.79 CI 95% 1.24-2.59). Furthermore, second and third line treatments significantly prolonged OS in advanced BTC (p < .001 HR:0.55 CI 95% 0.38-0.79; p = .007 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.31-0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION SII and NLR are useful prognostic factors and may be helpful in making treatment decisions. Additionally, second and later-line treatments in advanced BTC have a significant impact on survival under real-life conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Goktas Aydin
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burcin Cakan Demirel
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Pamukkale University Hospital, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bilici
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Atakan Topcu
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Bezmi Alem Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Musa Barış Aykan
- Gülhane Education & Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Seda Kahraman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ilgın Akbıyık
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Hospital Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Mustafa Atci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Omer Fatih Olmez
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Arzu Yaren
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Pamukkale University Hospital, Denizli, Turkey
| | | | - Caglayan Geredeli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mesut Seker
- Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Bezmi Alem Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Hospital Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Gülhane Education & Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Aydin
- Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dogan I, Ayhan M, Gurbuz M, Kucukarda A, Aydin E, Urun Y, Cicin I, Saip P. The frequency and prognostic significance of ABO/Rh blood groups in male breast cancer patients: A multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30147. [PMID: 36107512 PMCID: PMC9439766 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The study evaluated the distributions and prognostic significance of ABO and rhesus (D) groups in male breast cancer (MBC) patients. The data of 137 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, histopathological data and ABO/Rh blood groups of the patients were recorded. The ABO/Rh blood group distributions were compared to the healthy men control group (n = 120,160) by the chi-square test. Overall distributions of ABO blood groups were different between the patients (17.5% AB, 38% A, 19% B, and 25.5% O) and control group (7.88% AB, 42.06% A, 15.22% B, and 34.84% O) (P < .001). There were significant differences between the patients and control group with respect to AB vs non-AB blood group distributions (P < .001, odds ratio: 2.43, 95% CI) and O vs non-O blood group distributions (P = .016, odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI). However, A vs non-A and B vs non-B blood group distributions were not significantly different. The distribution of the Rh factor was similar between patients and the control group (P = .93). In univariate analysis, ABO/Rh blood groups were not a prognostic factor on OS (P = .29). The frequency of the AB blood group in MBC patients is increased than in the healthy control group. AB blood group may be a risk factor for MBC, whereas O blood group may be a protective factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izzet Dogan
- Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Ayhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Gurbuz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Kucukarda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Esra Aydin
- Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Pinar Saip
- Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bazarbashi S, Alsharm A, Meshref A, Mrabti H, Ansari J, Ghosn M, Abdulla M, Urun Y. Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Middle East African countries: Challenges and strategic recommendations. Urol Ann 2022; 14:303-313. [PMID: 36505997 PMCID: PMC9731188 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_148_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the reliance on Western guidelines for managing prostate cancer (PC), there are wide variations and gaps in treatment among developing countries such as the Middle East African (MEA) region. A multidisciplinary team of experts from the MEA region engaged in a comprehensive discussion to identify the real-world challenges in diagnostics and treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) and provided insights on the urgent unmet needs. We present a consensus document on the region-specific barriers, key priority areas and strategic recommendations by experts for optimizing management of mCRPC in the MEA. Limited access to genetic testing and economic constraints were highlighted as major concerns in the MEA. As the therapeutic landscape continues to expand, treatment selection for mCRPC needs to be increasingly personalized. Enhanced genetic testing and judicious utilization of newer therapies like olaparib, articulated by reimbursement support, should be made accessible for the underserved populations in the MEA. Increasing awareness on testing through educational activities catalyzed by digital technologies can play a central role in overcoming barriers to patient care in the MEA region. The involvement of multidisciplinary teams can bridge the treatment gaps, facilitating holistic and optimal management of mCRPC. Region-specific guidelines can help health-care workers navigate challenges and deliver personalized management through collaborative efforts - thus curb health-care variations and drive consistency. Development of region-specific scalable guidelines for genetic testing and treatment of mCRPC, factoring in the trade-off for access, availability, and affordability, is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouki Bazarbashi
- Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Address for correspondence: Dr. Shouki Bazarbashi, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, College of Medicine, Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. E-mail:
| | - Abdullah Alsharm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hind Mrabti
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University-Rabat, Morocco
| | - Jawaher Ansari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE
| | - Marwan Ghosn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Joseph University in Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guven DC, Acar R, Yekeduz E, Bilgetekin I, Baytemur NK, Erol C, Ceylan F, Sendur MA, Demirci U, Urun Y, Karadurmus N, Erman M, Kilickap S. The association between antibiotic use and survival in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a multi-center study. Curr Probl Cancer 2021; 45:100760. [PMID: 34130864 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy improves overall survival (OS) in the second and later lines of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. Recent studies have suggested that antibiotic (ATB) use either shortly before or after the start of immunotherapy could lead to decreased OS. Herein, we evaluate the impact of ATB use on OS in RCC patients treated with nivolumab in a multi-center cohort from Turkey. METHODS The data of 93 metastatic RCC patients treated with nivolumab in the second line or later were retrospectively collected from 6 oncology centers. Previous treatments, sites of metastases, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification, and ATB use in the three months before (-3) or three months after (+3) the start of immunotherapy were recorded together with survival data. The association of clinical factors with OS and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed with univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS The median age was 61 (interquartile range 54-67), and 76.3% of the patients were male. The median OS of the cohort was 23.75 ± 4.41, and the PFS was 8.44 ± 1.61 months. Thirty-one (33.3%) patients used ATBs in the 3 months before (-3) or 3 months after (+3) nivolumab initiation. In the multivariable analyses, ATB exposure (HR: 2.306, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.155-4.601, P = 0.018) and the presence of brain metastases at the baseline (HR: 2.608, 95% CI: 1.200-5.666, P = 0.015) had a statistically significant association with OS, while ATB exposure was the only statistically significant parameter associated with PFS (HR: 2.238, 95% CI: 1.284-3.900, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION In our study, patients with ATB exposure in the 3 months before or 3 months after the start of immunotherapy had shorter OS. Our findings further support meticulous risk-benefit assessments of prescribing ATBs for patients who are either receiving or are expected to receive immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Ramazan Acar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Emre Yekeduz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Cihan Erol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Furkan Ceylan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Erman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yekeduz E, Koksoy EB, Akbulut H, Utkan G, Urun Y. A trial-level correlation analysis of progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in the immunotherapy era. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18580 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is accepted as a surrogate endpoint for cancer drugs approval by the Food and Drug Association. In the expanding immunotherapy era, there is no convincing data for reliable surrogacy of PFS. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and included all phase III trials of ICIs. Besides, we manually included phase III trials of ICIs presented in congresses. Trials including non-metastatic patients and hematologic malignancies were excluded. The primary endpoint was the relationship between treatment effects (i.e., hazard ratio (HR) of PFS and overall survival (OS)). The secondary endpoint was the relationship between the median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS). We also performed subgroup analyses by ICIs subtypes (i.e., anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)), treatment lines (i.e., the first-line and subsequent treatments), ICI plus CT combination, and ICI monotherapy. To ensure parametric assumptions, we addressed logarithmic conversion to HRs by using log10. We used Pearson’s correlationand weighted linear regression for parametric variables and Spearman’s rank-order correlation for non-parametric variables. We assessed the relationship between variables by using correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (R2). Results: We included 57 phase III clinical trials with 39,525 patients. A total of 67 outcomes were compared. There was a good correlation between the logarithmic HR of PFS (log HRPFS) and OS (log HROS) (r=0.71, R2=0.50 p<0.001). In subgroup analyses, there was a weak or moderate correlation between the log HRPFS and log HROS in anti-PD-L1, ICI plus CT, and the first-line treatment subgroups (r=0.61, R2=0.38 p=0.004 for anti-PD-L1; r=0.65, R2=0.43 p=0.008 for ICI plus CT; r=0.70, R2=0.49 p<0.001 for the first-line treatment). Conversely, there was a good correlation between the log HRPFS and log HROS in the anti-PD-1, ICI monotherapy, and subsequent treatment line subgroups (r=0.81, R2=0.66 p<0.001 for anti-PD-1; r=0.71, R2=0.51 p<0.001 for ICI monotherapy; r=0.78, R2=0.62 p<0.001 for subsequent treatment line). Correlations between the mPFS and mOS were good or strong in all subgroups. (Table). Conclusions: PFS might be considered a reliable surrogate endpoint for OS, particularly in anti-PD-1 ICIs, ICI monotherapy, and subsequent metastatic cancer treatment lines.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Yekeduz
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Koksoy
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Matsubara N, De Bono JS, Olmos D, Procopio G, Kawakami S, Urun Y, van Alphen RJ, Flechon A, Carducci MA, Choi YD, Hotte SJ, Korbenfeld EP, Kramer G, Agarwal N, Dearden S, Gresty C, Kang J, Poehlein CH, Harrington E, Hussain MHA. Olaparib efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) carrying circulating tumor (ct) DNA alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM: Results from the PROfound study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
27 Background: ctDNA testing offers additional opportunities for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alteration determination in patients who are not able to access tumor tissue testing. Alteration testing in ctDNA, for BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM alterations was performed retrospectively in the PROfound study (phase 3 trial of olaparib versus physician’s choice of abiraterone or enzalutamide in men with HRR gene-mutated mCRPC [NCT02987543]). Methods: ctDNA samples were sequenced at FMI, using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay for alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA) and ATM, using plasma samples collected during screening in PROfound. Only patients who consented and provided plasma samples from Cohort A (BRCA/ ATM alteration positive by tissue testing) were tested for ctDNA alterations. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients positive for alterations in ctDNA was analysed via stratified log-rank test. Additional efficacy endpoints (Objective Response Rate [ORR], Overall Survival[OS]) were also assessed. Results: In total, 181/245 (73.9%) Cohort A patients consented and provided a plasma sample for ctDNA testing, of which 139/181 (76.8%) had a ctDNA result reported (either mutation positive or mutation negative) and 42 patient samples failed testing due to insufficient DNA yield or a technical failure of the test.BRCA/ ATM alterations were identified in111/139 (79.9%) patients and 28/139 patients did not report a BRCA/ATM mutation either due to lack of ctDNA shedding from the tumour or ctDNA levels below the sensitivity of the assay. Patients who carried BRCA/ ATM ctDNA alterations had comparable demography, baseline characteristics and proportions of BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM mutated patients to the overall Cohort A patients. rPFS by BICR results, in patients with BRCA/ ATM alterations in ctDNA, are presented in the Table. Key secondary efficacy endpoints (ORR, OS) will also be reported for ctDNA alteration positive patients. Conclusions: ctDNA testing in patients with mCRPC is feasible and most, but not all patients have concordant results. Patients who were positive for alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM showed a consistent rPFS improvement (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [0.21, 0.53]) when compared with the ITT population identified by tumor tissue testing (HR 0.34 [0.25, 0.47]). This suggests that using ctDNA to identify patients carrying BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM alterations who will benefit from olaparib may be beneficial. Clinical trial information: NCT02987543. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johann S. De Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Olmos
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, and Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Satoru Kawakami
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitma, Japan
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Aude Flechon
- Cancérologie Médicale, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon Cedex, France
| | | | - Young Deuk Choi
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Simon Dearden
- AstraZeneca, Precision Medicine & Biosamples, R&D Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Harrington
- Translational Medicine, Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Maha H. A. Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yekeduz E, Erturk I, Tural D, Karadurmus N, Karakaya S, Hizal M, Arslan Ç, Taban H, Küçükarda A, Şentürk Öztaş N, Sever ON, Uçar G, Sendur MAN, Demirci U, Kilickap S, Cicin I, Oksuzoglu B, Ozguroglu M, Urun Y. Nivolumab as second-line treatment and beyond for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A real-life experience from Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) Database. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
321 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) started a new era in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). CheckMate-025 and CheckMate-214 trials established the effect of ICIs in the second-line and upfront therapy of mRCC, respectively. This study aimed to share a real-life experience regarding nivolumab in the second-line treatment and beyond in mRCC Methods: We retrospectively searched the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database, which is the multicenter registry system, and extracted patients treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond. The patients treated with nivolumab plus targeted therapy or ipilimumab were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were response rates and safety. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in this study. The median age at the starting of nivolumab treatment was 61 years (Inter Quartile Range (IQR):55-67). Three out of four patients were male. One hundred four patients (78%) had previous nephrectomy. The majority of patients had clear-cell pathology (83%). Thirteen patients (10%) had sarcomatoid features. According to International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, seventy patients (52%) were in the intermediate and poor prognostic group. The previous drugs administered in each line before nivolumab are shown in the table below. The number of patients treated with nivolumab was 63(47%), 45(33%), 17(13%), and 9(7%) in the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line setting, respectively. The median OS was 34 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24.1-43.8)) with the 15 months (IQR:5-26) median follow-up. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 33% and 57%, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were pneumonitis (%1.4) and colitis (<%1). Conclusions: In compliance with the CheckMate-025 trial results, nivolumab improved OS for mRCC patients treated in the second line and beyond. The median OS was slightly higher in our study than the CheckMate-025 (34 months versus 25.8 months). It may be associated with the patient population in our study. Patients up to the fifth-line setting of mRCC treatment were included in this study. Of note, there was no additional safety concern for nivolumab. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Yekeduz
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Erturk
- University of Health Sciences Gülhane Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Tural
- Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- University of Health Sciences Gülhane Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serdar Karakaya
- University of Health Sciences Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Hizal
- Ankara City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Çağatay Arslan
- Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hakan Taban
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Küçükarda
- Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Nihan Şentürk Öztaş
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Nuray Sever
- Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Uçar
- Ankara City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Umut Demirci
- Üsküdar University, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- University of Health Sciences Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Ozguroglu
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yekeduz E, Dogan İ, Akbulut H, Karabulut S, Utkan G, Urun Y. A retrospective multicenter study: Clinicopathological factors affecting recurrence-free survival in operable gastric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
185 Background:Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Asian countries, particularly. However, according to the American Cancer Society, 27,600 new gastric cancer cases and 11,010 deaths due to gastric cancer will be observed in the US in 2020. The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) are 69.5% and 32% in the localized and regional diseases. Despite surgery and adjuvant treatment, gastric cancer’s recurrence rate is still not reasonable. In this multicenter study, we aimed to identify the clinicopathological factors that affect gastric cancer recurrence. Methods: Clinical and pathological data of the patients performed surgery between the 2009-2018 in the two university hospitals in Turkey was collected retrospectively. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and categorical variables were compared using a log-rank test. After identifying clinicopathological factors affecting RFS, a multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 27 (IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: Three hundred fifty-four patients were included in this study. Two out of three of all patients were male and the median age at diagnosis was 56 years old (Interquartile Range (IQR):48-64). The median follow-up was 25 months (IQR:15-50). The median RFS was 53.2 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI) could not calculated). 5-year survival rate was 64% and the median overall survival (OS) was 136 months (95% CI: 98-173). According to results of multivariate analysis, there was an increased risk for recurrence in patients with preoperative hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 gr/dl) [Hazard Ratio (HR): 5.3 (95% CI: 1.2-23.4]; p=0.005), and performed R1 resection [HR:5.7 (95% CI:1.2-25.3), p=0.02]. Additionally, patients administered chemoradiotherapy (CRT) had a lower risk for recurrence compared to those administered chemotherapy (CT) alone [HR:0.15 (95% CI:0.04-0.57), p=0.005]. Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia in the preoperative setting and R1 resection were independent factors that affected gastric cancer recurrence. However, postoperative CRT decreased the recurrence rate of gastric cancer compared to CT alone. Low albumin level is an indicator of a systemic inflammatory response and according to previous studies, hypoalbuminemia was a poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients. Although CT alone is considered efficient for patients undergone D2 lymph node dissection, our study showed that CRT decreased the recurrence rates compared to CT alone. This result might be related to the higher number of patients undergone D1 dissection in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Yekeduz
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İzzet Dogan
- Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Senem Karabulut
- Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yildiz F, Demirci U, Küçükarda A, Büyüksimsek M, Sakalar T, Topcu T, Aslan F, Tufan G, Aydin O, Turna H, Babacan N, Basoglu T, Kurt B, Yildiz B, Eren T, Demiray A, Gumusay O, Arslan C, Özdemir N, Urun Y, Baykara M, Turan N, Uysal M, Bilici A, Kavgaci H, Çiçin İ, Kilickap S, Paydas S. Merkel cell carcinoma in Turkey: A multicentric study. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17:1525-1529. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_950_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
16
|
Guven D, Acar R, Yekeduz E, Bilgetekin I, Baytemur NK, Erol C, Ceylan F, Sendur M, Demirci U, Urun Y, Karadurmus N, Erman M, Kilickap S. 99P The association between antibiotic use and survival in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: A multi-center study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
17
|
Erturk I, Karadurmus N, Kızıloz H, Acar R, Yildiz B, Aykan MB, Esen R, Buyukturan G, Urun Y, Erdem G, Arpacı F. Treating relapsed and refractory metastatic germ cell tumours with high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1657-1664. [PMID: 33050802 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220964540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM To demonstrate the real-life data about patients who underwent AHSCT due to GCT. METHODS Between November 2016 and April 2020, 64 patients who received CE as high-dose chemotherapy for AHSCT in the Gulhane Education and Research Hospital were included in the study. Sixty-one patients received one AHSCT with CE chemotherapy regimen. Survival data and clinical characteristics were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS The mean age of the patients were 31.9 ± 9 (min-max:18-55). With a median follow-up of 10.7 ± 8.7 months, the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 57.8%, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 77.5%. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 21.5 ± 1.8 (95% CI: 14.5-33.4) and 20 ± 2 months, respectively. The response rate was 72%. There were three treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION This sizeable single-centre study shows that patients with relapsed metastatic GCT are curable by CE as high dose chemotherapy plus AHSCT with reliable toxicity even for a single cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Halil Kızıloz
- Department of Urology, Nevsehir Government Hospital, Nevsehir, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Acar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Birol Yildiz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Esen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Diskapi Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Galip Buyukturan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gulhane School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Erdem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Special Liv Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fikret Arpacı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Special Liv Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Soydal C, Nak D, Araz M, Akkus P, Urun Y, Ozkan E, Kucuk NO, Kir MK. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of bone metastases of prostate carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 40:1243-1249. [PMID: 31688499 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography in the comparison of planar bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases. Another purpose is to define the additional benefit of bone scintigraphy subsequent to prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography and the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography in the treatment planning. MATERIAL AND METHOD Forty-six patients with a median interval of 19 (range: 3-90) days between prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy included in the analysis. Diagnostic performance of both modalities was calculated and compared. RESULTS Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy were performed for initial staging in 25 (54%), for evaluation of biochemical recurrence in 11 (24%) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma in 10 (22%) patients. In the patient-based analysis sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases were calculated as 50%, 19-29%, 32-39%, 32-39%, and 33-39%, respectively, based on whether equivocal findings were classified as positive or negative. For prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography, these values were found significantly higher as 100%, 95-100%, 98-100%, 96-100%, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy and PET/computed tomography in clinical subgroups was analyzed, prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography was superior to bone scintigraphy in three groups. CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography was found to be superior to planar bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases. Additional bone scintigraphy seems to be unnecessary in patients who underwent prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography within three months period without additional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yuksel Urun
- Medical Oncology Departments of Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yildiz B, Kucukarda A, Gokyer A, Gokcen Demiray A, Paydas S, Pinar Aral I, Gumusay O, Bilici A, Akdeniz N, Bahceci A, Demir H, Esin E, Üyeturk U, Nihat Okten I, Erturk I, Turk HM, Topaloglu US, Basoglu T, Serdar Turhal N, Yesil Cinkir H, Menekse S, Cakmak Y, Urun Y, Acar R, Kut E, Dal P, Sakalar T, Halit Aktepe O, Karadurmus N, Bilici A. Does primary tumor localization has prognostic importance in seminoma patients?: Turkish Oncology Group Study. J BUON 2020; 25:1130-1135. [PMID: 32521916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary tumor localization may be a risk factor for relapse and survival in seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) patients. METHODS In our study, 612 seminomatous GCT patients diagnosed in 22 centers between 01.01.1989 and 03.02.2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system data were used for the study. RESULTS The primary tumor was localized in the right testis in 305 (49.9%) patients and in 307 (50.1%) in the left testis. Mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 16-85±10.4). The median follow-up period was 47 months (1-298). Recurrence was observed in 78 (12.7%) patients and 29 (4.7%) died during the follow-up period. Four-year overall survival (OS) was 95.4% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. The relationship between localization and relapse was significant in 197 patients with stage 2 and stage 3 (p=0.003). In this patient group, 41 (20.8%) relapses were observed. Thirty (73.2%) of the relapses were in the right testis and 11 (26.8%) in the left testis. Four-year OS was 92.1% in patients with right tumor; and 98.7% in patients with left tumor (p=0.007). When 612 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was a 6.6% survival advantage in patients with left testicular tumor and this difference was significant (p=0.007). CONCLUSION Survival rates of patients with primary right testicular localization were worse compared with left testicular localization, and relapse rates were higher in stage 2 and 3 patients with right testicular localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birol Yildiz
- Health Sciences University, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yaşar HA, Akkus E, Heper A, Akay BN, Urun Y, Utkan G. Sweet's syndrome under ipilimumab therapy and a brief comparison of the cases in literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:1762-1764. [PMID: 32089071 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220906885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ipilimumab is an anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody. Ipilimumab has shown improvement in overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Because ipilimumab activates the immune system against the tumor, ipilimumab is associated with adverse events related to immune system activation. Immune-associated side effects are frequently seen in the gastrointestinal system and skin. Sweet's syndrome (SS) is an uncommon inflammatory disorder. Some drugs or malignancy can cause SS. Only a few case reports have been reported of ipilimumab-associated SS. CASE A 53-year-old female with metastatic melanoma was treated with ipilimumab. After the fourth cycle, she developed painful lesions on her legs and hands. The pathologic biopsy of the lesions revealed neutrophilic dermatosis consistent with SS.Management and outcome: The patient was treated with 60 mg/day of prednisone for four days, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and inhaler bronchodilator and steroid. She had symptomatic relief at the beginning of treatment. The prednisone doses were quickly tapered every three days. When the patient was treated with 10 mg/day of prednisone for three days, the skin nodules recurred. Prednisone 40 mg per day was re-started and then a slower taper by decreasing by 10 mg/day every week was instituted. After one-month treatment the prednisone dose was given as a 5 mg doses for one week and then stopped. No new lesions recurred after slower taper of prednisone. CONCLUSION Herein we report a case presented with SS under ipilimumab therapy. Melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab can develop SS. The clinicians should be aware of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatime A Yaşar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erman Akkus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aylin Heper
- Department of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bengu N Akay
- Department of Dermatology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Akbulut M, Urun Y. Onco-cardiology: Drug-drug interactions of antineoplastic and cardiovascular drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 145:102822. [PMID: 31911396 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cancer are still the leading causes of death. There are many common etiologic factors, especially smoking and obesity. Therefore, it is not uncommon for CVD and cancer to coexist. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) inevitably occur in this group of patients, where polypharmacy is increasing due to older age and multiple comorbidities. However, multidisciplinary studies, especially close collaboration of medical oncologists and cardiologists, who deals with the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases, awareness and preventive approaches to DDIs may reduce serious morbidity and mortality. In this review, information about the common treatments used in cardiology and oncology and possible DDIs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muge Akbulut
- Department of Cardiology, Yuksekova State Hospital, Yuksekova, Hakkari, 30300, Turkey.
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University School of Medicine; Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Soydal C, Araz M, Urun Y, Nak D, Ozkan E, Kucuk NO. Prognostic importance of prostatic specific antigen response in patients who received Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen treatment for castration resistant prostate cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 65:282-286. [PMID: 31602963 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to analyze the prognostic importance of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) response in patients who received radioligand therapy (RLT) with Lu-177 Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for their castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS Thirty consecutive patients who received Lu-177 PSMA treatment for their castration-resistant prostate carcinoma were included. All the patients had undergone Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scanning before Lu-177 PSMA therapy, which revealed multiple metastases. Patients were treated with a fixed dose (180 mCi) of Lu-177 PSMA at six to eight weeks intervals. PSA response was evaluated using Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Serum PSA response was classified as PSA progression (25% increase over the baseline and an increase in the absolute-value PSA level by at least 5 ng per millilitre), any <50% decline or ≥50% decline. PSA response was evaluated six weeks after every cycle. Response evaluation with radiological imaging and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT were performed before the first cycle and eight weeks after the last cycle. RESULTS Thirty patients were treated with a total of 171 cycles (median 4, range 3-7) of Lu-177 PSMA. A decline in serum PSA of ≥50% was detected in ten patients (33%) while a decline in PSA of any amount was observed in fifteen (50%) patients after the first cycle. After the last cycle, a decline in PSA ≥50% and of any amount was seen in thirteen (43%) and fourteen (46%) patients, respectively. Of the fifteen patients who were not responder after the first cycle, three (20%) had a decline in PSA of any amount after the completion of the RLT. Moreover, of the 20 patients who did not have a ≥50% decline in PSA level after the first cycle, four (20%) became responder after the last cycle. Regarding serum PSA response after the first cycle, median OS was significantly higher for patients who had ≥50% decline in PSA level with 21.0±10.0 (95% CI: 1.2-40.7) months compared to patients who had not with 8.0±2.6 (95% CI: 2.7-13.2) months (P=0.012). A decline in PSA of any amount after the first cycle did not have a significant impact on median OS (12.0±1.1 vs. 6.0±2.5 months, P=0.08). The decline in serum PSA level after the last cycle of treatment had a significant impact on OS. Median OS for the decline in PSA of any amount was calculated as 13.0±1.0 (95% CI: 10.9-15.0) months for responders and 6.0±1.9 (95% CI: 2.2-9.7) months for non-responders (P=0.016). Considering ≥50% of decline as a response, median OS was 21.0±5.8 (95% CI: 9.5-32.4) months for responders and 6.0±3.0 (95% CI: 0.1-11.8) months for non-responders (P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS Serum PSA level during RLT with Lu-177 PSMA remains a clinically significant factor to predict OS times. About twenty percent of patients who were not responder after the first cycle could become responder after the last cycle. However, patients without PSA response after completion of all cycles should be closely followed-up. Non-responder patients can achieve a response with further treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cigdem Soydal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey - .,-
| | - Mine Araz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Demet Nak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elgin Ozkan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye O Kucuk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arzu Yaşar H, Turna H, Esin E, Murat Sedef A, Alkan A, Oksuzoglu B, Ozdemir N, Sendur MAN, Sezer A, Kılıckap S, Utkan G, Akbulut H, Celik I, Abalı H, Urun Y. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with mucosal and ocular melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group study. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 26:267-272. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155219840796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate prognostic factors associated with the use of ipilimumab in patients with mucosal and uveal melanoma. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, 31 patients with uveal and mucosal melanoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 were enrolled. Patients’ characteristics, metastatic disease sites, treatment before ipilimumab therapy, performance status, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase levels, B-RAF and c-kit mutation status, toxicity, and survival data were assessed for patients with mucosal and uveal melanoma. SPSS version 17 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis. The log-rank test was used for univariate analyses. The Cox regression analysis was used to test the association between multivariate variables and survival. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Twenty patients had uveal and eleven patients had mucosal melanoma. The median overall survival was seven months (95% confidence interval: 1.1–12.7). In univariate analysis, while bone metastasis, anemia, high lactate dehydrogenase level, and more metastatic sites were associated with lower overall survival, better treatment response and administration of ipilimumab in first or second lines were associated with favorable overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only treatment response status and administration of ipilimumab in first or second lines were found to be significant as independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusion Ipilimumab therapy may be associated with increased survival, but this retrospective small N study makes that hard to definitely conclude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Arzu Yaşar
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hande Turna
- Medical Oncology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ece Esin
- Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Murat Sedef
- Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ali Alkan
- Medical Oncology, Osmaniye State Hospital, Osmaniye, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Medical Oncology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - MA Nahit Sendur
- Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kılıckap
- Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Celik
- Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Abalı
- Medical Oncology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ergun Y, Ozdemir NY, Guner EK, Esin E, Sendur MA, Koksoy EB, Demirci NS, Eren T, Dede I, Sezer A, Engin H, Oksuzoglu B, Yalcin B, Utkan G, Zengin N, Urun Y. Comparison of Gemcitabine monotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis. J BUON 2018; 23:116-121. [PMID: 30722120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gemcitabine is among the standard first-line agents for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, as the median survival with gemcitabine monotherapy is 6 months, different combinations are being studied for better, prolonged survival. In this multicenter study, we aimed to compare the results of gemcitabine monotherapy with those of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS Data of 664 patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer between January 2007 and December 2016 from seven oncology centers in Turkey were retrospectively evaluated, and 319 patients with gemcitabine alone (n=138) or gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (n=181) as first-line treatment were included. RESULTS The median patient age was 62 years (range 42-79), being 60 years (42-75) in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm and 67 years (52-79) in gemcitabine alone arm. no complete response was observed in either arm, whereas partial response rates were 30.1% in gemcitabine/cisplatin arm and 15.3% in gemcitabine alone arm (p=0.001). median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI:7.7-10.2) and was significantly longer in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm than in the gemcitabine alone arm (10 vs. 6 months, p=0.004). CONCLUSION The cemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer yields significantly prolonged survival over gemcitabine monotherapy. In patients with favorable performance conditions, the combination therapy should be preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakup Ergun
- Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Urun Y, Yasar HA, Turna H, Esin E, Sedef AM, Alkan A, Oksuzoglu B, Ozdemir N, Sendur MAN, Sezer A, Kılıckap S, Utkan G, Akman T, Akbulut H, Celik I, Abalı H. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group study. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2018; 25:1658-1664. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155218805539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Studies in the last decade show survival improvement with checkpoint blocker therapy in patients with metastatic malign melanoma. Our purpose was to define the efficacy of ipilimumab according to the patient's baseline characteristics including absolute lymphocytes count. Methods We collected the data of 97 patients with advanced malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, q3w) retrospectively. Log-rank test was used to analyze the univariate effects of patient's characteristics (age, gender, metastatic sites, ECOG PS, type of melanoma, lactic dehydrogenase levels, anemia, lymphocytes (L), neutrophils (N), N/L ratio), c-kit and BRAF status. Survival analyses were estimated with Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the possible factors identified with log-rank test. Results The median age was 58, and 58% were male and 90% of patients had at least one prior systemic therapy. The median survival was 9.7 months for all patients; and the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 43% and 19%, respectively. Absolute lymphocytes count, lactic dehydrogenase level, bone metastasis, the number of metastatic sites, and RECIST response were significantly related to survival. After Cox regression analysis, RECIST response (complete or partial response), absolute lymphocytes count (more than 1500/mm3) and the number of metastatic sites (less than three sites) remained as significant independent prognostic factors for longer survival. Conclusion Ipilimumab improved survival of patients with metastatic malign melanoma. However, patients with fewer metastatic sites and higher absolute lymphocytes count have a significantly better benefit. To determine if these markers could be used to direct patient therapy, further validation analysis is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - H Arzu Yasar
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hande Turna
- Medical Oncology, İstanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ece Esin
- Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Murat Sedef
- Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ali Alkan
- Medical Oncology, Osmaniye State Hospital, Osmaniye, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Medical Oncology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - MA Nahit Sendur
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kılıckap
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tulay Akman
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Kent Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Celik
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Abalı
- Medical Oncology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Esin E, Oksuzoglu B, Bilici A, Cicin I, Kostek O, Kaplan MA, Aksoy S, Aktas BY, Ozdemir O, Alacacioglu A, Cabuk D, Sumbul AT, Sakin A, Paydas S, Yetisir E, Er O, Korkmaz T, Yildirim N, Sakalar T, Demir H, Artac M, Karaagac M, Harputluoglu H, Bilen E, Erdur E, Degirmencioglu S, Aliyev A, Cil T, Olgun P, Basaran G, Gumusay O, Demir A, Tanrikulu E, Yumuk PF, Imamoglu I, Oyan B, Cetin B, Haksoyler V, Karadurmus N, Erturk I, Evrensel T, Yilmaz H, Beypinar I, Kocer M, Pilanci KN, Seker M, Urun Y, Yildirim N, Eren T, Demirci U. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane-based treatment for visceral organ metastatic, trastuzumab-naïve breast cancer: real-life practice outcomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 83:131-143. [PMID: 30377778 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3712-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to describe the real-life practice outcomes of pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane (PTT) combination in visceral organ metastatic, trastuzumab-naive breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS This study was conducted by Turkish Oncology Group and included 317 patients' data from 36 centers. RESULTS Median age was 51 (22-82). Median PFS was 28.5 months, while median OS was 40.3 months. Patients with brain metastases (n: 13, 4.1%) had worse PFS (16.8 m vs. 28.5 m; p = 0.002) and OS (26.7 m vs. 40.3 m; p = 0.009). Patients older than 65 years of age (n: 42, 13.2%) had significantly lower OS results (19.8 m vs. 40.3 m; p = 0.01). Two hundred sixty-eight patients (86.7%) received docetaxel while 37 patients (11.7%) received paclitaxel. PFS and OS were similar between taxane groups. In eight patients (2.5%), 5-40% ejection fraction decrement from baseline was detected without any clinical sign of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS Our RLP trial included only visceral metastatic, trastuzumab-naïve BC patients including cases with brain involvement who received PTT combination in the first-line treatment. Regardless of negative prognostic characteristics, our results are in parallel with pivotal trial. Further strategies for brain metastasis should be developed to improve outcomes despite encouraging results with PTT treatment. Taxane selection can be personalized and endocrine maintenance may further improve outcomes after taxanes were discontinued. To our knowledge, this is the largest scale real-life clinical practice study of pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane therapy to date.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/secondary
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Lobular/secondary
- Docetaxel/administration & dosage
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
- Trastuzumab/administration & dosage
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ece Esin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - B Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Bilici
- Departmant of Medical Oncology, Medipol University International Health Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - I Cicin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - O Kostek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - M A Kaplan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - S Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Y Aktas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, İzmir K.C. University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - A Alacacioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, İzmir K.C. University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - D Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Izmit, Turkey
| | - A T Sumbul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Sakin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Paydas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - E Yetisir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - O Er
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Korkmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - N Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - T Sakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - H Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - M Artac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Medical Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - M Karaagac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Medical Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - H Harputluoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - E Bilen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - E Erdur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Degirmencioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - A Aliyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Cil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adana City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey
| | - P Olgun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adana City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey
| | - G Basaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - O Gumusay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
| | - A Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Okmeydani Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - E Tanrikulu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - P F Yumuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Inanc Imamoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Diskapi Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Oyan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - B Cetin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, RTE University, Rize, Turkey
| | - V Haksoyler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakir G.Y. Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - N Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Evrensel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - H Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - I Beypinar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - M Kocer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta S.D University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - K N Pilanci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haseki Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Seker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bayindir Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Y Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Eren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - U Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zengin G, Özyurt N, Beypınar I, Yesil Cinkir H, Bilgin B, Gumusay O, Erturk I, Sendur MAN, Uysal M, Urun Y, Demirci U. Efficiency and safety of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Real life experience from Turkey. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e15551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Guliz Zengin
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neslihan Özyurt
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Beypınar
- Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon, Turkey
| | - Havva Yesil Cinkir
- Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Burak Bilgin
- Yıldırım Beyazıd University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozge Gumusay
- Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Tokat, Turkey
| | - Ismail Erturk
- Gulhane Education and Training Hospital, Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Yıldırım Beyazıd University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mukremin Uysal
- Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oksuzoglu B, Esin E, Koksoy EB, Demirci NS, Sendur MAN, Dede I, Sezer A, Karcı E, Yildirim N, Yalcin B, Utkan G, Urun Y. Independent prognostic value of inflammation in metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e16212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Berna Oksuzoglu
- Dr. A.Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ece Esin
- Dr. A. Y Ankara Oncoilogy Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TN, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Koksoy
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nebi Serkan Demirci
- Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital Department Of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Yıldırım Beyazıd University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Isa Dede
- Ankara University Medical Faculty Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karcı
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Yildirim
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bulent Yalcin
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yildiz F, Büyüksimsek M, Sakalar T, Aydin O, Turna H, Babacan NA, Yildiz B, Arslan C, Özdemir N, Urun Y, Uysal M, Gumusay O, Tufan G, Aslan F, Paydas S, Demirci U. Merkel cell carcinoma in Turkey: A multicentric study. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e21591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Yildiz
- Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Büyüksimsek
- Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Teoman Sakalar
- Erciyes University Department of Medical Oncology, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Ovgu Aydin
- Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hande Turna
- Istanbul University Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Birol Yildiz
- Gulhane Education and Training Hospital, Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Nuriye Özdemir
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mukremin Uysal
- Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon, Turkey
| | | | - Gulnihal Tufan
- Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferit Aslan
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Semra Paydas
- Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Soydal C, Urun Y, Suer E, Nak D, Ozkan E, Kucuk NO. Predictor of 68Ga PSMA PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 64:226-230. [PMID: 29745629 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03056-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate predictive factors of 68Gallium (68Ga) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) positivity. METHODS Relationships between serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, Gleason Score (GS) and positivity of 68Ga PSMA PET in patients who underwent 68Ga PSMA PET/CT for restaging for PCa were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS One hundred and four (median age: 67; range: 51-88) patients were included in this study. Of these patients, PSMA PET was positive in 75 (72%) patients. Mean serum PSA levels for PET negative and positive groups were 0.76±1.00 and 180.85±324.93 ng/mL (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga PSMA PET/CT for detection of disease recurrence were calculated as 92% and 80%, respectively, for the 1.4 ng/mL PSA cut-off and 92% and 90%, respectively, for the 2 ng/mL PSA cut-off values. The positivity rates for patients with PSA levels <1.4 ng/mL and ≥1.4 ng/mL were 21% and 90%, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS 68Ga PSMA PET/CT seems to be a highly sensitive in patients with early PSA recurrence. Patients with higher GS and early PSA recurrence could benefit from 68Ga PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cigdem Soydal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey -
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Evren Suer
- Department of Urology, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Demet Nak
- Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elgin Ozkan
- Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye O Kucuk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bir Yücel K, Yasar A, Ucar G, Utkan G, Yildirim N, Urun Y. Systemic immune inflammation index and treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
591 Background: To investigate the prognostic value of the pretreatment inflammatory characteristics on treatment response and survival. Methods: We included 151 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) Patients’ charts were retrospectively analyzed for their clinical, pathological and demographic features. Systemic immune inflammation index (SII) cut off is estimated with median value. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for univariate analysis and Cox-regression for multivariate analysis. Results: In high SII group (SII > 844) overall survival is 11 months and in low SII group (SII < 844) overall survival is 22 months (p = 0,008). Median OS is lower in the hypercalcemic group (7 months vs.18 months, P = 0,013). In patients with anemia and thrombocytosis, OS is lower (41 months vs. 13 months p = 0,001 and 6 months vs. 18 months p = 0,01). In multivariate analysis, anemia, SII, and ECOG performance status were able to predict OS (HR = 2,69, HR = 2,04, HR = 2,57) Conclusions: In patients with mRCC, SII may have a prognostic value and higher score may related with decreased overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arzu Yasar
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Nuriye Yildirim
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Urun Y, Kankaya D, Koral L, Yalcin B, Karabork A, Ceyhan K, Boruban MC, Utkan G, Demirkazik A. Intraabdominal Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma: A Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature. Tumori 2018; 99:e65-9. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161309900231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare neoplasm that originates from follicular dendritic cells in lymphoid follicles. FDCS has been increasingly reported in recent years. However, data on FDCS are mostly based on single case reports or case series and its natural history and standard treatment are not clear. To increase the understanding of this rare disease, we report our experience of three cases of FDCS with an analysis of the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics, clinical course, treatment options and response to treatment. In addition, we reviewed the literature on FDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Duygu Kankaya
- Department of Medical Pathology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Lokman Koral
- Department of Medical Oncology, Selcuk University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya
| | - Bulent Yalcin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk Research and Educational Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayca Karabork
- Department of Medical Pathology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Koray Ceyhan
- Department of Medical Pathology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Melih Cem Boruban
- Department of Medical Oncology, Selcuk University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya
| | - Gungor Utkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Ahmet Demirkazik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cirak Y, Sever ON, Urun Y. Benign metastasizing leiomyoma of bone and lung in postmenopausal women: two rare case reports and review of the literature. EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL 2017; 38:118-121. [PMID: 29767878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Benign metastasizing leiomyoma (BML) is a rare disease that mostly occurs in women of reproductive age. Patients usually have a history of uterine leiomyoma and/or myomectomy. Although lung is the most common site of metastasis, bone involvement is rarely occurred. Here the authors report two rare cases of BML with lung and bone metastasis in postmenopausal women that were successfully treated with surgery and anti-estrogen approach.
Collapse
|
34
|
de Velasco G, Gray KP, Hamieh L, Urun Y, Carol HA, Fay AP, Signoretti S, Kwiatkowski DJ, McDermott DF, Freedman M, Pomerantz MM, Choueiri TK. Pharmacogenomic Markers of Targeted Therapy Toxicity in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2:633-639. [PMID: 28723497 PMCID: PMC5520643 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapy (TT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may be associated with a high rate of toxicity that undermines treatment efficacy and patient quality of life. Polymorphisms in genes involved in the pharmacokinetic pathways of TTs may predict toxicity. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three core genes involved in the metabolism and transport of sunitinib and the mTOR inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus are associated with adverse events (AEs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Germline DNA was extracted from blood or normal kidney tissue from mRCC patients of Caucasian ethnicity in two cohorts treated with either sunitinib (n=159) or mTOR inhibitors (n=62). Six SNPs in three candidate genes (CYP3A4: rs2242480, rs4646437, and rs2246709; CYP3A5: rs15524; and ABCB1: rs2032582 and rs1045642) were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Primary endpoints were grade ≥3 AEs for all patients; grade ≥3 hypertension in the sunitinib cohort, and any grade pneumonitis in the mTOR inhibitors cohort. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between SNPs and AEs, with adjustment for relevant clinical factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 221 samples were successfully genotyped for the selected SNPs. In the sunitinib cohort, the CYP3A4 rs464637 AG variant was associated with a lower risk of high-grade AEs (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.88; p=0.03), but no SNPs were associated with hypertension. In the mTOR inhibitor cohort, none of the selected SNPs was associated with analyzed toxicities. CONCLUSIONS We observed an association between CYP3A4 polymorphisms and toxicity outcomes in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib, but not with everolimus or temsirolimus. Our findings are exploratory in nature, and further validation in independent and larger cohorts is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We found that variants of CYP3A4, a gene involved in drug metabolism, are associated with sunitinib toxicity. This information may help in better selection of patients for targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn P Gray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lana Hamieh
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Turkey
| | - Hallie A Carol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andre P Fay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; PUCRS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J Kwiatkowski
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David F McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark M Pomerantz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alkan A, Yasar A, Karcı E, Koksoy EB, Urun M, Cay Senler F, Urun Y, Ergun H, Akbulut H. Severe drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication usage in elderly patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.10056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alkan
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Yasar
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karcı
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Koksoy
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muslih Urun
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Filiz Cay Senler
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Ergun
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Pharmacology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Alkan A, Guc ZG, Cay Senler F, Yavuzsen T, Onur H, Dogan M, Karcı E, Yasar A, Koksoy EB, Tanriverdi O, Turhal NS, Urun Y, Mizrak D, Ozkan A, Akbulut H. Persistent postmastectomy pain syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder among breast cancer survivors (ORTHUS study): A study of the palliative care working committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e21702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alkan
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gulsum Guc
- Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, IÌZmir, Turkey
| | - Filiz Cay Senler
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tugba Yavuzsen
- Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Handan Onur
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Dogan
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Department of medical oncolgy, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karcı
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Yasar
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Koksoy
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Tanriverdi
- Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Department of Medical Oncology, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Nazim S. Turhal
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilsa Mizrak
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Asiye Ozkan
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Urun Y, Ozdemir NY, Utkan G, Akbulut H, Savas B, Oksuzoglu B, Oztuna DG, Dogan I, Yalcin B, Senler FC, Onur H, Demirkazik A, Zengin N, Icli F. ABO and Rh blood groups and risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 13:6097-100. [PMID: 23464411 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.12.6097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have observed an association between ABO blood group and risk for certain gastrointestinal malignancies, including pancreatic and gastric cancer. However, it is unclear whether there is such an association with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, possible relationships between ABO blood groups and Rh factor and KRAS status in patients with CRC were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 1,620 patients with CRC, blood group and Rh factor were examined and compared with the control group of 3,022,883 healthy volunteer blood donors of the Turkish Red Crescent between 2004 and 2011. The relationship of blood groups with wild type K-ras status was also evaluated. RESULTS Overall distributions of ABO blood groups as well as Rh factor were comparable between patients (45% A, 7.2% AB, 16.4% B, 31.4% O, and 87.2% Rh+) and controls (42.2% A, 7.6% AB, 16.3% B, 33.9% O, and 87.7% Rh+) (p=0.099). However, there were statistically significant difference between patients and controls with respect to O vs. non O blood group (p=0.033) and marginally significant difference for A vs. non-A blood group (p=0.052). Among patients, the median age was 62 (range 17-97), 58.1% were male. There were no statistically significant differences respect to sex and K-ras status. CONCLUSION In present study, the ABO/Rh blood groups were statistically significantly associated with the risk of CRC. There were no relationship between K-ras status and ABO blood group and Rh factor. However further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to establish the role of blood groups and to define the mechanisms by which ABO blood type affect CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alkan A, Guc ZG, Senler FC, Yavuzsen T, Onur H, Dogan M, Karci E, Yasar A, Koksoy EB, Tanriverdi O, Turhal S, Urun Y, Ozkan A, Mizrak D, Akbulut H. Breast cancer survivors suffer from persistent postmastectomy pain syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder (ORTHUS study): a study of the palliative care working committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:3747-55. [PMID: 27039206 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3202-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Persistent postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is one of the most important disturbing symptoms. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder which is characterized by reactions to reminders of the trauma that has been experienced. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictors of PMPS and PTSD in Turkish breast cancer survivors and the correlation between PMPS and PTSD. METHOD The study is designed as a multicenter survey study. Breast cancer patients in remission were evaluated. Patients were evaluated with structured questionnaires to assess the PMPS and clinical parameters associated with it. The Turkish version of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist-civilian version (PCL-C) was used. RESULTS Between February 2015 and October 2015, 614 breast cancer survivors in outpatient clinics were evaluated. The incidence of PMPS documented is 45.1 %. In the multivariate analysis low income, presence of PTSD and <46 months after surgery were associated with increased risk of PMPS. PTSD was documented in 75 %, and the mean PCL-C score was 32.4 ± 11.1. PMPS and being married at the time of the evaluation were linked with PTSD. CONCLUSIONS It is the first data about the association between PMPS and PTSD. The clinicians should be aware of PMPS and PTSD in breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. .,Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp fakültesi hastanesi, Cebeci hastanesi, Tıbbi onkoloji bilim dalı, Mamak/Ankara, TR 06890, Turkey.
| | - Zeynep Gulsum Guc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Filiz Cay Senler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tugba Yavuzsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Handan Onur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Yasar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Koksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Tanriverdi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Serdar Turhal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Asiye Ozkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilsa Mizrak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Markt SC, Shui IM, Unger RH, Urun Y, Berg CD, Black A, Brennan P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Gapstur SM, Giovannucci E, Haiman C, Henderson B, Hoover RN, Hunter DJ, Key TJ, Khaw KT, Canzian F, Larranga N, Le Marchand L, Ma J, Naccarati A, Siddiq A, Stampfer MJ, Stattin P, Stevens VL, Stram DO, Tjønneland A, Travis RC, Trichopoulos D, Ziegler RG, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Mucci LA, Choueiri TK, Wilson KM. ABO blood group alleles and prostate cancer risk: Results from the breast and prostate cancer cohort consortium (BPC3). Prostate 2015; 75:1677-81. [PMID: 26268879 PMCID: PMC4578997 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ABO blood group has been associated with risk of cancers of the pancreas, stomach, ovary, kidney, and skin, but has not been evaluated in relation to risk of aggressive prostate cancer. METHODS We used three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs8176746, rs505922, and rs8176704) to determine ABO genotype in 2,774 aggressive prostate cancer cases and 4,443 controls from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate age and study-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between blood type, genotype, and risk of aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥8 or locally advanced/metastatic disease (stage T3/T4/N1/M1). RESULTS We found no association between ABO blood type and risk of aggressive prostate cancer (Type A: OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.87-1.08; Type B: OR = 0.92, 95%CI =n0.77-1.09; Type AB: OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.98-1.59, compared to Type O, respectively). Similarly, there was no association between "dose" of A or B alleles and aggressive prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS ABO blood type was not associated with risk of aggressive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Markt
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Irene M. Shui
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Robert H. Unger
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Christine D. Berg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Black
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Susan M. Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Brian Henderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert N. Hoover
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David J. Hunter
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy J. Key
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nerea Larranga
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BIODonostia Research Institute, Basque Health Department, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | - Jing Ma
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Alessio Naccarati
- HuGeF Foundation Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Torino, Italy
| | - Afshan Siddiq
- Department of Genomics of Common Disease, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Meir J. Stampfer
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Par Stattin
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Sweden
| | | | - Daniel O. Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Ruth C. Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitrios Trichopoulos
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Bureau of Epidemiologic Research, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
| | - Regina G. Ziegler
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sara Lindstrom
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Lorelei A. Mucci
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kathryn M. Wilson
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Urun Y, Abal H, Turna H, Esin E, Sedef A, Alkan A, Oksüzoğlu B, Ozdemir N, Sendur M, Sezer A, Kiliçkap S, Akbulut H, Celik I. 3354 Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) Study. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Kose F, Sedef AM, Özdemir N, Gunaldi M, Urun Y, Besen AA, Sumbul AT, Goksu SS, Dogan O, Mertsoylu H, Tatli AM, Erdem D, Demirci S, Gunduz S, Yildirim M, Ozyilkan O, Abali H. Can primary tumor localization predict the which patient will have benefit from addition of taxanes to platin-5-FU based regimens in metastatic gastric cancer. Multi center retrospective analysis from Turkey, Society of Turkish Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e15030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Kose
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | | | - Nuriye Özdemir
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Meral Gunaldi
- Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | | | | | - Sema Sezgin Goksu
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | | | - Huseyin Mertsoylu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ali Murat Tatli
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Dilek Erdem
- Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Serkan Demirci
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Ozgur Ozyilkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Urun Y, Leow JJ, Fay AP, Albiges L, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J. ERCC1 as a prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with platinium-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
351 Background: Platinium based chemotherapy (CT) is an essential part in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (AUC). However, not all patients derive benefit. A body of evidence suggests that excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression level may correlate with outcome in platinum treated patients. We thought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to better elucidate its role in AUC. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all studies comparing platinum-based regimens according to expression levels of ERCC1 for patients with AUC. The search included the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to June 2014. Pooled analyses were conducted using fixed and random effects models. Results: A total of 554 patients included in eight studies were evaluated. ERCC1 expression was positive in 270 (49%) patients and negative in 284 (51%) patients. The median age of patients was 63 years. The overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients with negative ERCC1 expression (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–3.67; p=0.006). There was moderate amount of between-study heterogeneity present (I-square 70%). Conclusions: This study's findings support the hypothesis that low ERCC1 expression is associated with benefit from cisplatin-based treatment. The substantial amount of between-study heterogeneity may indicate the need for standardized methods to classify ERCC1 expression level. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the role of ERCC1 levels for treatment selection in patients with AUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | | | | | | | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Urun Y, Utkan G, Cangir AK, Oksuzoglu OB, Ozdemir N, Oztuna DG, Kocaman G, Coşkun HŞ, Kaplan MA, Yuksel C, Demirkazik A, Icli F. Association of ABO blood group and risk of lung cancer in a multicenter study in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 14:2801-3. [PMID: 23803034 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.5.2801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ABO blood groups and Rh factor may affect the risk of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 2,044 lung cancer patients with serologically confirmed ABO/Rh blood group. A group of 3,022,883 healthy blood donors of Turkish Red Crescent was identified as a control group. We compared the distributions of ABO/Rh blood group between them. RESULTS The median age was 62 years (range: 17-90). There was a clear male predominance (84% vs. 16%). Overall distributions of ABO blood groups were significantly different between patients and controls (p=0.01). There were also significant differences between patients and controls with respect to Rh positive vs. Rh negative (p=0.04) and O vs. non-O (p=0.002). There were no statistically significant differences of blood groups with respect to sex, age, or histology. CONCLUSIONS In the study population, ABO blood types were associated with the lung cancer. Having non-O blood type and Rh-negative feature increased the risk of lung cancer. However, further prospective studies are necessary to define the mechanisms by which ABO blood type may influence the lung cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yetisyigit T, Babacan N, Urun Y, Seber S, Arpaci E, Cihan S, Yildirim N, Oksuzoglu OB, Aksoy S, Budakoglu B, Yalcin BC, Yalcin S, Zengin N, Alkis N. Predictors of outcome in patients with advanced nonseminamatous germ cell testicular tumors. J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e15528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tarkan Yetisyigit
- Namik Kemal University Medical Oncology Department, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - Nalan Babacan
- Cumhuriyet University Medical Oncology Deparment, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Seber
- Tekirdag State Hospital Medical Oncology Clinic, tekirdag, Turkey
| | | | - Sener Cihan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Yildirim
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Medical Oncology Department, Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Aizer AA, Urun Y, McKay RR, Kibel AS, Nguyen PL, Choueiri TK. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). BJU Int 2014; 113:E67-74. [PMID: 24053727 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether patients with metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). PATIENTS AND METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme to identify a population-based sample of 4914 patients diagnosed with metastatic RCC between 2000 and 2009. Of the 4914 patients, 591 had non-clear-cell histology. The median follow-up was 20 months. The primary outcome measure was RCC-specific mortality. RESULTS Approximately 64% of patients underwent CN. Patients with non-clear-cell histology who underwent CN had lower RCC-specific and all-cause mortality than those who did not (P < 0.001 in both cases). After adjustment for age, gender, race, marital status, year of diagnosis, geographical location and histology, the associations between CN and lower RCC-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.80, P < 0.001) and between CN and all-cause mortality (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.37-0.55, P < 0.001) remained highly significant. Among patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2009 (targeted therapy era), the results remained unchanged (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.72, P < 0.001 and HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59, P < 0.001, respectively). An interaction model found lower all-cause mortality for all histologies after CN. CONCLUSIONS Patients from the SEER programme with metastatic non-clear-cell RCC, including those treated in the targeted therapy era, appear to derive a survival benefit from CN, an association which remained significant regardless of histological subtype. This observation suggests that CN should remain standard in patients with advanced RCC who are deemed to be surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayal A Aizer
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
69 Background: An individual’s blood group is defined by variability in glycotransferases expressed on red blood cell surface; these ABO antigens are also highly expressed on epithelial cells. Previous studies have suggested associations between ABO blood group and increased risk of epithelial cancers including gastric, pancreatic, and ovarian; however, its relationship with risk of prostate carcinoma, and its aggressiveness remains unclear. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the association between ABO blood group and risk of lethal prostate cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) from 1996 to 2008. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for other risk factors and prostate-specific antigen testing. Results: During 12 years of follow-up of 26,602 men, 2,703 cases of incident prostate cancer were documented, including 289 lethal cases (prostate cancer death or distant metastases). The frequency of ABO blood type was similar between men who developed prostate cancer (37% A, 7% AB, 13% B, and 43% O) and other participants (37% A, 8% AB, 12% B, and 43% O). On multivariate analysis, blood type was not associated with overall prostate cancer incidence. However, compared to men with blood group O, those with blood group AB were significantly less likely to develop lethal prostate cancer (multivariate-adjusted HR = 0.39 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.18-0.85]). There was no association between type B or A compared to O with lethal disease. ABO blood type was not significantly associated with the risk of advanced stage or high-grade cancers (Gleason score 8 to 10). Conclusions: Blood group AB was associated with a lower risk of lethal prostate cancer compared to blood group O. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings and to clarify possible biological mechanisms underlying this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Edward L. Giovannucci
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Paul Linh Nguyen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yetisyigit T, Babacan N, Urun Y, Seber ES, Cihan S, Arpaci E, Yildirim N, Aksoy S, Budakoglu B, Zengin N, Oksuzoglu B, Yalcin BC, Alkis N. Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Advanced Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Tumors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:831-5. [DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
48
|
Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Rajagopal PS, Patel CG, Anderson EM, Rothman AT, Cote RJ, Urun Y, Chang SL, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J. Adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a 2013 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol 2013; 66:42-54. [PMID: 24018020 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2013] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains poorly defined for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The last meta-analysis evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy, conducted in 2005, had limited power to fully support its use. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence of the benefit of postoperative adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared with control (ie, surgery alone) in patients with MIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy with control for patients with MIBC. The search included the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to May 2013. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 945 patients included in nine RCTs (five previously analyzed, one updated, and three new) were examined. For overall survival, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) across all nine trials was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.99; p=0.049). For disease-free survival, the pooled HR across seven trials reporting this outcome was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45-0.91; p=0.014). This disease-free survival benefit was more apparent among those with positive nodal involvement (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS This updated and improved meta-analysis of randomized trials provides further evidence of an overall survival and disease-free survival benefit in patients with MIBC receiving adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Padma S Rajagopal
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chirayu G Patel
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin M Anderson
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T Rothman
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard J Cote
- Department of Pathology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; University Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Urun Y, Kankaya D, Koral L, Yalcin B, Karabork A, Ceyhan K, Boruban MC, Utkan G, Demirkazik A. Intraabdominal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Tumori 2013. [PMID: 23748832 DOI: 10.1700/1283.14210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare neoplasm that originates from follicular dendritic cells in lymphoid follicles. FDCS has been increasingly reported in recent years. However, data on FDCS are mostly based on single case reports or case series and its natural history and standard treatment are not clear. To increase the understanding of this rare disease, we report our experience of three cases of FDCS with an analysis of the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics, clinical course, treatment options and response to treatment. In addition, we reviewed the literature on FDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Urun Y, Gray KP, Signoretti S, McDermott DF, Atkins MB, Lampron ME, Freedman M, Choueiri TK, Pomerantz MM. Pharmacogenetics as predictor of sunitinib and mTOR inhibitors toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4570 Background: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in major pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) pathways of targeted agents may affect the incidence of drug toxicities. Methods: Germline DNA was extracted fromwhole blood or normal kidney parenchyma frommRCC pts of European ancestry in two cohorts: those treated with VEGF-targeted therapy (sunitinib) (n=159) or with an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus or temsirolimus) (n=62). Ten SNPs in 6 candidate genes: CYP3A4 (rs2242480, rs4646437, rs2246709), CYP3A5 (rs15524), ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642), VEGFR2 (rs2305948), NR1I3 (rs2307424, rs2307418), FLT3 (rs1933437) were genotyped using Sequenom iPlex Gold platform. Logistic regression model tested the association of genotype variants with adverse events of 1) grade 3/4 (G3/4) toxicity and G3/4 hypertension (for sunitinib cohort) and 2) grade 3/4 toxicity and all grade pneumonitis (for mTOR inhibitors cohort), adjusted for clinical factors associated with toxicity outcomes. Results: In the sunitinib cohort, median treatment duration was 7.7 months (IQR=3-15.5), 83 (52%) pts had grade 3/4 toxicities and 22 (14%) had grade 3/4 hypertension. Rare variant (AG) of CYP3A4 rs464637 was associated with the reduced risk of grade 3/4 toxicities (4 events/17 cases) vs. wild-type (GG, 73 events/134 cases), (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.08-0.88, p=0.03). No association between SNPs and hypertension was observed. In the mTOR inhibitor cohort, median treatment duration was 3.4 months (IQR=1.4-6), 21(34%) pts had G3/4 toxicities and 27 (43%) had all grade pneumonitis. No association between SNPs and G3/4 toxicities was observed. Rare homozygote (GG) of FLT3 SNP rs1933437 was associated with increased risk of all grade pneumonitis (7 events/ 9 cases) vs. wild-type (AA, 4 events/12 cases), however, given the very small variant group size, further investigation is required to verify the association. Conclusions: The minor allele of SNP rs464637 in the gene CYP3A4 may influence sunitinib toxicity. Further validation is needed to determine if the marker could be used for in targeted therapy dosing strategies and direct patient care. (IQR=Interquartile Range).
Collapse
|