The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures--a biomechanical comparison of two techniques

Biomechanical evaluation of ortho-bridge system and proximal femoral nail antirotation in intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall fracture based on finite element analysis

Background

The integrity of the lateral wall in femoral intertrochanteric fractures significantly impacts fracture stability and internal fixation. In this study, we compared the outcomes of treating intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall involvement using the ortho-bridge system (OBS) combined with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) versus simple PFNA from a biomechanical perspective.

Methods

Finite-element models of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall involvement were subjected to fixation with OBS combined with PFNA and simple PFNA. Von Mises stress measurements and corresponding displacement assessments for each component of the model, including the proximal femur and lateral wall, were used to evaluate the biomechanical effects of OBS fixation on bone and intramedullary nail stability.

Results

Using PFNA alone to fix intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall involvement resulted in von Mises stress levels on the lateral wall exceeding safe stress tolerances for bone growth. OBS fixation significantly reduced stress on the lateral wall of the femur and minimized the stress on each part of the intramedullary nail, reducing the overall displacement.

Conclusion

In cases of intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall involvement, PFNA fixation alone may compromise the biomechanical integrity of the lateral femoral wall, increasing the risk of postoperative complications. The addition of OBS to PFNA significantly reduces stress on the lateral femoral wall. Consequently, OBS should be considered for lateral wall fixation when managing intertrochanteric fractures combined with lateral wall fractures.

Comparing the Biomechanical Stability of Cerclage Cable with Plate Insert Versus Locking Screw in Periprosthetic Humeral Fracture

BACKGROUND

In the setting of periprosthetic humeral fractures, the humeral stem of the implant represents a substantial challenge to the optimal method of proximal fixation. This study aimed to compare the initial biomechanical stability provided by cerclage cables with a locking plate insert versus bicortical locking screws (i.e., the gold standard for fixation) in fresh cadaveric humeri.

METHODS

After calculating the sample size, we utilized 10 sets of cadaveric specimens and created a 5-mm osteotomy gap 120 mm distal to the tip of the greater tuberosity, simulating a Wright and Cofield type-B periprosthetic humeral fracture on each specimen. Using 3 locking screws for distal fragment fixation, identical in all specimens, the specimens were assigned to Group A (3 cerclage cables with a plate insert) or Group B (3 locking bicortical screws) for proximal fragment fixation. Biomechanical tests included stiffness in varus and valgus bending, torsion, and axial compression, and a single load to failure.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the biomechanical metrics between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that fixation with use of cerclage cables with a plate insert demonstrated biomechanical stability comparable with that of bicortical locking screw fixation when addressing the proximal fragment in Wright and Cofield type-B periprosthetic humeral fractures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For proximal fragment fixation of periprosthetic humeral fractures, cerclage cables with a plate insert can be utilized as an effective fixation method that offers initial fixation strength that is comparable to the use of 3 locking bicortical screws.

Long locking plate combined with locking attachment plate in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture around ipsilateral stem after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to introduce the surgical technique using long locking plate and locking attachment plate (LAP) in patient with periprosthetic femoral fracture around ipsilateral stem after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, we sought to investigate the outcomes of this fixation technique and to propose a new subtype in the existing classification of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

METHODS

From January 2013 to January 2022, thirty-four consecutive periprosthetic femoral fractures around ipsilateral stem following TKA with minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled in this study. Most cases were fixed with long-locking plate and LAP using the MIPO technique. For subgroup analysis, we classified patients with stemmed hip implant (group H) and stemmed knee implant (group K). Bone union, American Knee Society Score (AKSS) scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain and function, and range of motion were investigated.

RESULTS

The number of group H and K were 24 patients (70.6%) and 10 patients (29.4%), respectively. The mean age at operation was 71.5 years (range, 65‒85 years), and the mean follow-up period was 27.5 months (range, 12‒72 months). Bone union was confirmed radiographically in all patients, and the mean union time was 4.9 months (range, 3.5‒6 months). There were no significant differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-locking plate combined with LAP showed favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture around ipsilateral stem after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.

The addition of cerclage wiring does not improve proximal bicortical fixation of locking plates for Type C periprosthetic fractures in synthetic humeri

BACKGROUND

Treatment of proximal humerus periprosthetic fractures is challenging. It remains difficult to achieve robust fixation of the proximal fragment to the locking plate using cerclage wiring and/or unicortical screws. Use of polyaxial tangentially directed bicortical locking screws increases screw purchase, but it is unclear if this option provides robust fixation. This biomechanical study compares fixation of constructs using cerclage wires, bicortical locking screws, and a hybrid method utilizing both methods.

METHODS

Uncemented humeral stems were implanted into synthetic humeri and Type C periprosthetic fractures were simulated with a 1 cm transverse osteotomy. Distal ends of locking plates were secured with bicortical non-locking screws. The proximal ends were supported by either isolated cerclage wires, polyaxial locking screws, or a hybrid combination of both (n = 6 for each group). A universal test frame was used for non-destructive torsion and cyclic axial compression tests. 3-D motion tracking was employed to determine stiffnesses and relative interfragmentary motions.

FINDINGS

Isolated screw constructs showed significantly increased resistance against torsional movement, bending, and shear, (p < 0.05) in comparison to cerclage constructs. The hybrid construct provided no significant changes in stability over the isolated screw construct.

INTERPRETATION

Addition of cerclage wires in this synthetic bone model of Type C periprosthetic humerus fractures did not add significant stability to proximal bicortical locking plate fixation. Considering risks of tissue stripping and nerve injury, usage of cerclage wires in a similar clinical setting should be chosen carefully, especially when bicortical fixation around the prosthetic stem can be achieved.

Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the Ortho-Bridge System: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

We undertook a comparative biomechanical study of type B1 fractures around femoral prostheses following cemented hip arthroplasty using the Ortho-Bridge System (OBS) and a locking compression plate/locking attachment plate structure (LCP + LAP). We aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics and advantages of the OBS compared with LCP + LAP when treating this fracture type.

METHODS

An OBS fixation model was designed based on OBS and LCP + LAP fixation characteristics. The LCP + LAP combination (Group A) and three different OBS combinations (Groups B, C, and D) were used to fix a B1 fracture model with a femoral periprosthetic fracture. Axial compression and torsion experiments were then performed using simple and comminuted fracture models. The axial compression failure experiment was carried out, and the model stiffness during axial compression, torsion angle in torsion test, and vertical load in the final failure test were collected.

RESULTS

When simulating simple oblique fractures, no significant difference was found among the four groups in terms of stiffness in the axial compression experiment (P = 0.257). The torsion angle of the LCP + LAP system was significantly higher compared with the OBS system (P < 0.05). When simulating a comminuted fracture, the experimental data for axial compression showed that the rigidity measurements of the three combinations of the OBS system were higher compared with the LCP + LAP system (P = 0.000) and that the torsion angles of three combinations of the OBS system were smaller compared with the LCP + LAP system (P < 0.05). In the axial compression failure test, the fixed failure mode of the LCP + LAP system was the destruction of the contact cortex at the fracture site, whereas the failure modes in the three OBS combinations involved fracture around the screws above the osteotomy and destruction of the contact cortex at the fracture site.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed that the OBS produced superior biomechanical outcomes compared with LCP + LAP, especially for the bridging two-rod dual cortex. According to the performance observed after model axial compression destruction, the OBS was fixed and provided greater stress dispersion, which might make it more suitable for facilitating early functional movement and avoiding the failure of internal fixation.

Use of the Locking Attachment Plate for Internal Fixation of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

Introduction

The locking attachment plate (LAP) can be added to a locking compression plate (LCP) to allow the fixation of locking screws bicortically around a femoral implant. We aimed to examine surgical and fracture characteristics associated with healing for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) treated with constructs employing LAP fixation. We hypothesize that the addition of an LAP provides stable peri-implant fixation.

Materials &Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 28 PPFFx surgically treated with LCP-LAP constructs by 4 surgeons from 2015-2020. Fractures were classified and grouped using the Vancouver Classification System and included 12 B1, 2 B2, 11 C fractures, and 3 fractures around other stemmed implants. Primary outcome measures included hardware failure such as screw pullout, broken screws, and plate fracture. Clinical complications including infection, non-union, malunion, and reoperation were recorded.

Results

No LAP failures, screw pullout, or broken screws were observed. Two fractured plates (7.1%) occurred in patients with Vancouver C fracture types. Overall complication rate was 17.9% and included 3 non-unions, 1 deep infection, and 1 implant loosening with painful hardware, each requiring reoperation. Differences were observed between unions and nonunions for total number of screws (12.4 vs 14.7, P = .005) and number of locking screws used (8.04 vs 11.3, P = .03).

Conclusion

The LAP provides adequate fixation and low failure rates where fixation is required around a well-fixed stem. When failures occur, it is from plate breakage and not due to failure of fixation at the area of plate-stem overlap.

A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison

In recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ^®, aap Implantate AG) with a standard L.I.S.S. LCP^® (DePuy Synthes) regarding their biomechanical properties in fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the new LOQTEQ system has superior stability and durability in comparison. Eighteen artificial left femurs were randomized in two groups (Group A: LOQTEQ^®; Group B: L.I.S.S. LCP^®) and tested until failure. Failure was defined as 10° varus deformity and catastrophic implant failure (loosening, breakage, progressive bending). Axial stiffness, loads of failure, cycles of failure, modes of failure were recorded. The axial stiffness in Group A with 73.4 N/mm (SD +/− 3.0) was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than in Group B (40.7 N/mm (SD +/− 2.8)). Group A resists more cycles than Group B until 10° varus deformity. Catastrophic failure mode was plate breakage in Group A and bending in Group B. In conclusion, LOQTEQ^® provides higher primary stability and tends to have higher durability.

Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures

Background

Biomechanical stability assessment of 3 different constructs for proximal fixation of a locking compression plate (LCP) in treating a Worland type C periprosthetic fracture after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

27 Worland type C fractures after shoulder arthroplasty in synthetic humeri were treated with 14-hole LCP that is proximally fixed using the following: (1) 1 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires and 2x unicortical-locking screws, (2) 3 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires, or (3) 2x bicortical-locking attachment plates. Torsional stiffness was assessed by applying an internal rotation moment of 5 Nm and then after unloading the specimen, an external rotation moment of 5 Nm at the same rate was applied. Axial stiffness was assessed by applying a 50 N preload, and then applying a cyclic load of 250 N, then increasing the load by 50 N each time, until a maximum axial load of 2500 N was reached or specimen failure occurred.

Results

With regard to internal as well as external rotational stiffness, group 1 showed a mean stiffness of 0.37 Nm/deg and 0.57 Nm/deg, respectively, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 0.51 Nm/deg and 0.39 Nm/deg, respectively, while group 3 had a mean stiffness of 1.34 Nm/deg and 1.31 Nm/deg, respectively. Concerning axial stiffness, group 1 showed an average stiffness of 451.0 N/mm, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 737.5 N/mm, whereas group 3 had a mean stiffness of 715.8 N/mm.

Conclusion

Group 3 displayed a significantly higher torsional stiffness while a comparable axial stiffness to group 2.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation in Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures: A biomechanical study comparing two plate systems

Introduction

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur are an increasing problem in today's trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Owing to the hip stem, implant anchorage is very difficult in the proximal femur. This study compares two plate systems regarding their biomechanical properties and the handling in periprosthetic fracture fixation of the proximal femur.

Materials and methods

Using eight pairs of fresh, frozen human proximal femora the Locking Compression Plate/Locking Attachment Plate construct (LCP/LAP) (group I, DePuy Synthes) was compared to the new LOQTEQ® periprosthetic distal lateral femur plate (group II, AAP Implantate AG). After implantation of press fit femoral hip stems a Vancouver B1 fracture model was used. Biomechanical testing was performed by cyclic axial loading with a constant increment of 0.1 N/cycle starting from 750 N axial loading. Every 250 cycles an a.p. x-ray was done to evaluate failure.

Results

The Group II showed significant higher axial stiffness (+42%) compared with Group I. In addition, Group II withstood significantly more load-cycles until failure (20%). The mode of catastrophic failure was plate breakage in Group II, whereas, in Group I, all plates showed an early bending followed by plate breakage.

Discussion and conclusion

Both plate systems enable screw placement around hip stems. The hinge plate showed superior biomechanical results compared with the locking compression plate/locking attachment plate construct. Furthermore, the hinge plate offers variable hinges and variable angel locking making bicortical screw placement around hip stems more comfortable and safe.

The translational potential of this article

The results of this study can be directly transferred to patient care. With the innovative hinge plate, the surgeon has a biomechanically superior implant, which also offers improved options for screw placement compared to a standard locking plate.

[Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles]

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) are becoming an increasingly important topic in orthopedics and trauma surgery due to the rising number of endoprosthetic joint replacements. The recently published unified classification system (UCS) has replaced numerous historical classification systems and can be applied to all PPFx regardless of the bone or joint involved. The treatment of PPFx requires individual therapeutic concepts taking patient-dependent and patient-independent factors into consideration. The conservative treatment of PPFx is only justified in exceptional situations. In contrast, the choice between operative treatment and deciding between osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty is particularly based on the assessment of the implant stability. In order to achieve fracture consolidation and also a good functional outcome, knowledge of the basic biomechanical principles of operative (osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis) treatment of periprosthetic fractures is necessary.

Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures

Aims

We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis.

Patients and Methods

The study utilized data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and information from patient records. We included all primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in Sweden since 1979, and undergoing further surgery due to Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fracture between 2001 and 2011. The primary outcome measure was any further reoperation between 2001 and 2013. Cross-referencing with the National Patient Register was performed in two stages, in order to identify all surgical procedures not recorded on the SHAR.

Results

Out of 1381 Vancouver type B fractures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 257 underwent further reoperation by the end of 2013. Interprosthetic and Type B1 fractures had a higher risk for reoperation. For B1 fractures, the rate of reoperation did not differ (p = 0.322) after use of conventional (26%) or locking plate osteosynthesis (19%). No significant differences were observed between cemented, cementless monoblock, and cementless modular revision components for the treatment of type B2 and B3 fractures.

Conclusion

In this country-specific study, the choice of locking or conventional plates for the treatment of type B1, and cemented or cementless femoral components fixation for B2 and B3 fractures, had no significant influence on risk for reoperation. Interprosthetic fractures adversely affected the outcome of treatment of type B fractures. Differences in the patient characteristics of the compared groups were observed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1447–1458.

The risk of loosening of extramedullary fracture fixation devices

Extramedullary devices that use screws, pins or wires are used extensively to treat fractures in normal and diseased bone. A common failure mode is implant loosening at the bone-screw/pin/wire interface before fracture healing occurs. This review first considers the fundamental mechanics of the bone-fixator construct with focus on interfacial strains that result in loosening. It then evaluates the time-independent and time-dependent material models of bone that have been used to simulate and predict loosening. It is shown that the recently developed time-dependent models are capable of predicting loosening due to cyclic loads in bone of varying quality.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing - Part II

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fracture is a severe complication of total hip arthroplasty. A previous review published in 2011 summarised the biomechanical studies regarding periprosthetic femoral fracture and its fixation techniques. Since then, there have been several commercially available fracture plates designed specifically for the treatment of these fractures. However, several clinical studies still report failure of fixation treatments used for these fractures.

METHODS

The current literature on biomechanical models of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation since 2010 to present is reviewed. The methodologies involved in the experimental and computational studies of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation are described and compared with particular focus on the recent developments.

FINDINGS

Several issues raised in the previous review paper have been addressed by current studies; such as validating computational results with experimental data. Current experimental studies are more sophisticated in design. Computational studies have been useful in studying fixation methods or conditions (such as bone healing) that are difficult to study in vivo or in vitro. However, a few issues still remain and are highlighted.

INTERPRETATION

The increased use of computational studies in investigating periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation techniques has proven valuable. Existing protocols for testing periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation need to be standardised in order to make more direct and conclusive comparisons between studies. A consensus on the 'optimum' treatment method for periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation needs to be achieved.

Vascular complication after percutaneous femoral cerclage wire

Cerclage wire is an effective fracture fixation method. However, its mechanical benefits are countered by local ischemia. Its efficacy for treating femoral periprosthetic fractures has been demonstrated since femoral fixation is possible even there is a stem in the diaphysis. It securely holds the proximal femur typically with an additional plate. The development of minimally-invasive surgery with plate fixation has led to the cerclage wire being inserted percutaneously. Here, we report on a case of secondary femoral ischemia following percutaneous cerclage wire of a periprosthetic femoral fracture. This was a Vancouver type B1 fracture. On the 3rd day after admission, minimally-invasive fixation with a femoral locking plate was performed with five cerclage wires added percutaneously. During the immediate postoperative course, the patient developed ischemia of the operated leg that required vascular surgery after confirmation by CT angiography. An arterial stop was visible with deviation of the superior femoral artery, which was not properly surrounded by the cerclage wire. The latter pulled perivascular tissues towards the femur. When combined with reduced arterial elasticity due to severe atherosclerosis, it resulted in arterial plication. The postoperative course was marked by multiple organ failure and death of the patient. Percutaneous surgery is an attractive option but has risks. The presence of severe atherosclerosis is a warning sign for loss of tissue elasticity. This complication can be prevented by preparing the bone surfaces and carefully positioning the patient on the traction table to avoid forced adduction. The surgeon must also be familiar with alternative techniques to cerclage wire such as polyaxial screws and additional plates.

Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices

Objectives

Secondary fracture healing is strongly influenced by the stiffness of the bone-fixator system. Biomechanical tests are extensively used to investigate stiffness and strength of fixation devices. The stiffness values reported in the literature for locked plating, however, vary by three orders of magnitude. The aim of this study was to examine the influence that the method of restraint and load application has on the stiffness produced, the strain distribution within the bone, and the stresses in the implant for locking plate constructs.

Methods

Synthetic composite bones were used to evaluate experimentally the influence of four different methods of loading and restraining specimens, all used in recent previous studies. Two plate types and three screw arrangements were also evaluated for each loading scenario. Computational models were also developed and validated using the experimental tests.

Results

The method of loading was found to affect the gap stiffness strongly (by up to six times) but also the magnitude of the plate stress and the location and magnitude of strains at the bone-screw interface.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the method of loading is responsible for much of the difference in reported stiffness values in the literature. It also shows that previous contradictory findings, such as the influence of working length and very large differences in failure loads, can be readily explained by the choice of loading condition.

Cite this article: A. MacLeod, A. H. R. W. Simpson, P. Pankaj. Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:111–120. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0074.R2.

Locking attachment plate fixation around a well-fixed stem in periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures are difficult to manage. Plating technique has been considered a reliable form of management of periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem, but a dependable and stable method of plate fixation to the bone is lacking. This study reports the clinical results using a locking attachment plate (LAP) instead of cable fixation to fix locking plates to a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed stemmed implants were studied between August 2012 and December 2014. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively. Median age was 74 years (range 56-96 years). Fractures were classified according to the Unified Classification System, Vancouver classification, and Su classification.

PROCEDURE

Open reduction was performed under minimal incision and the locking plate was fixed to the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft. The part of the shaft without a stem was fixed to the plate using 5.0-mm locking screws, and the part with an underlying stem was fixed using 3.5-mm locking screws through the LAP instead of cables. Postoperatively, patients were managed using general principles for femoral shaft fractures.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 16 months (range 12-36 months). All cases achieved fracture healing without loss of reduction. There were no cases of implant breakage or stem loosening at final follow-up. The average number of LAPs per fixation construct was 2.1 (range 1-4), and the average number of 3.5-mm locking screws through each LAP was 3.3 (range 2-4). The average value of plate screw density was 0.55 (range 0.37-0.8), and the average working length was four holes (range 2-8).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the LAP to manage periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem could obviate the need for cable around the stem area and yield acceptable outcomes.

Double plating in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: A biomechanical study

Periprosthetic hip fractures are an increasing problem in modern orthopedic and trauma surgery. Many options for the operative treatment are available to the surgeon ranging from modern variable angular systems to standard plates, screws, and cerclages. However, there is no gold standard and therefore, the aim of this study, was to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of double plating versus a lateral standard plate in a Vancouver B1 fracture model. Ten 4th generation composite femora were used to implant cementless total hip prosthesis and create Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures. Afterwards, the osteotomies were fixed using the locking compression plate in combination with the locking attachment plate (LCP, LAP, DePuy Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland)-group I. Group II additionally achieved a 5-hole 4.5/5.0 mm LCP anteriorly. Each construct was cyclically loaded to failure in axial compression. Axial construct stiffness was 50.87 N/mm (SD 1.61) for group I compared to 738.68 N/mm (SD 94.8) for group II, this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.016). The number of cycles to failure was also significant higher for group II (2,375 vs. 13,000 cycles; p = 0.016). Double plating can significantly increase construct stiffness and stability, and thus, is an option in the treatment of complex periprosthetic fractures, in revision surgery and for patients with the inability to partial weight bear. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:234-239, 2017.

Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs

OBJECTIVES

This biomechanical study compared Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures fixed with either a locking plate and anterior allograft strut construct or an equivalent locking plate with locking attachment plates construct in paired cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

After 9 pairs of cadaveric femora were implanted with a cemented primary total hip arthroplasty, an oblique osteotomy was created distal to the cement mantle. Femora underwent fixation with either: (1) a locking plate with anterior strut allograft (locking compression plating (LCP)-Allograft) or (2) a locking plate with 2 locking attachment plates (LAPs) (LCP-LAP). Construct stiffness was compared in nondestructive mechanical testing for 2 modes of compression (20 degrees abduction and 20 degrees flexion), 2 four-point bending directions (anterior-posterior and medial-lateral), and torsion. A final load to failure test evaluated the axial compression required to achieve fracture gap closure or construct yield. Fixation was compared through paired t tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The LCP-Allograft construct demonstrated higher stiffness values in compressive abduction (207 ± 57 vs.151 ± 40 N/mm), torsion (1666 ± 445 vs. 1125 ± 160 N mm/degree) and medial-lateral four-point bending (413 ± 135 vs. 167 ± 68 N/mm) compared with the LCP-LAP construct (P < 0.05). No differences were identified between the 2 constructs in compressive flexion, anterior-posterior bending, or the load to failure test (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of the anterior allograft strut created a stiffer construct compared with the LCP-LAP for the treatment of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fracture only in loading modes with increased medial-lateral bending. Although these static load results are indicative of the early postoperative environment, further fatigue testing is required to better understand the importance of the reduced medial-lateral stiffness over a longer period.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone

Fixation techniques of periprosthetic fractures are far from ideal although the number of this entity is rising. The presence of an intramedullary implant generates its own fracture characteristics since stiffness is altered along the bone shaft and certain implant combinations affect load resistance of the bone. Influencing factors are cement fixation of the implant, intramedullary locking and extramedullary or intramedullary localization of the implant and the cortical thickness of the surrounding bone. Cerclage wires are ideally suited to fix radially displaced fragments around an intramedullary implant but they are susceptible to axial and torsional load. Screws should be added if these forces have to be neutralized. Stability of the screw fixation itself can be enhanced by embracement configuration around the intramedullary implant. Poor bone stock quality, often being present in metaphyseal areas limits screw fixation. Cement augmentation is an attractive option in this field to enhance screw purchase.

Enhancing fixation strength in periprosthetic femur fractures by orthogonal plating-A biomechanical study

Orthogonal plate osteosynthesis enhances fixation stability in periprosthetic femur fractures. Another option are locking attachment plates (LAP) allowing bicortical locking screw placement lateral to the prosthesis stem. Stability of lateral plate osteosynthesis with two LAP (2LAP) was compared to anterolateral orthogonal plate osteosynthesis (OP) with one LAP in a periprosthetic femur fracture model. In six pairs of fresh frozen human femora with cemented Charnley hip prosthesis, a transverse osteotomy was set distal to the tip of the prosthesis simulating a Vancouver type B1 fracture. Each pair was instrumented using a plate tensioner with either one lateral plate and two LAP, or two orthogonal anterolateral plates and one LAP. Stiffness was determined in a four-point-bending test prior to cyclic testing (2Hz) with physiologic profile and progressively increasing load up to catastrophic construct failure. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon-signed-rank test were used for statistical evaluation at a level of significance p = 0.05. The OP construct exhibited a significantly higher number of cycles and load to failure (39,627 cycles ± 4,056; 4,463 N ± 906) compared to the 2LAP construct (32,927 cycles ± 3,487; 3,793 N ± 849), p < 0.01. Mediolateral bending and torsional stiffness of the OP (1610 N/mm ± 249; 16.9 Nm/mm ± 6.3) were significantly higher compared to 2 LAP (1077 N/mm ± 189; 12.1 Nm/mm ± 3.9), p = 0.03 for both comparisons. Orthogonal plate osteosynthesis is a valuable option in periprosthetic fracture surgery, offering increased stability compared to a single lateral plate fixed with two LAP.

Better Axial Stiffness of a Bicortical Screw Construct Compared to a Cable Construct for Comminuted Vancouver B1 Proximal Femoral Fractures

The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate the Locking attachment plate (LAP) construct in comparison to a Cable plate construct, for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures after cemented total hip arthroplasty. Each construct incorporated a locking compression plate with bi-cortical locking screws for distal fixation. In the Cable construct, 2 cables and 2 uni-cortical locking screws were used for proximal fixation. In the LAP construct, the cables were replaced by a LAP with 4 bi-cortical locking screws. The LAP construct was significantly stiffer than the cable construct under axial load with a bone gap (P=0.01). The LAP construct offers better axial stiffness compared to the cable construct in the fixation of comminuted Vancouver B1 proximal femoral fractures.

Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVES

The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods.

METHODS

Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined.

RESULTS

Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty. An analysis of 17 cases

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty and analyze their treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted on a series of 17 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip hemiarthroplasty. Fourteen fractures were treated surgically. The characteristics of patients, fractures and treatment outcomes in terms of complications, mortality and functionality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The large majority (82%) of patients were women, the mean age was 86 years and with an ASA index of 3 or 4 in 15 patients. Ten fractures were type B. There were 8 general complications, one deep infection, one mobilization of a non-exchanged hemiarthroplasty, and 2 non-unions. There were 85% consolidated fractures, and only 5 patients recovered the same function prior to the injury. At the time of the study 9 patients had died (53%).

DISCUSSION

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty will increase in the coming years and their treatment is difficult.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty are more common in women around 90 years-old, and usually occur in patients with significant morbidity. Although the Vancouver classification is reliable, simple and reproducible, it is only a guide to decide on the best treatment in a patient often fragile. The preoperative planning is essential when deciding a surgical treatment.

Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of surgically-treated periprosthetic femoral fractures with an orthogonal double plate system.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of ten patients (mean age 79.5 years) surgically treated for periprosthetic femoral fractures using orthogonal double plating (lateral and additional anterior plate position) from 2010 to 2013. The patients' demographic characteristics, complications and initial follow-up data were retrieved from our institutional database. After a minimum of six months post-surgery, we performed a radiological and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The surgical indications for orthogonal plating were heterogenic; five patients were treated for periprosthetic fractures around their total hip prosthesis. One was treated for a fracture around a total knee prosthesis and one for an interprosthetic fracture. Additionally, three patients were treated for postoperative implant failure after the stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures around a total hip prosthesis (one) or total knee prosthesis (two). Osteosynthesis was performed using locking compression plates exclusively (length between eight and 20 holes). After a mean follow-up of 22.6 months (range, six to 42 months), two patients died, but their deaths were due to old age morbidity and were unrelated to the surgery. Surgical revision for implant failure was necessary for only one female patient due to a breakage of the lateral plate. In addition, no other failures, such as infection or non-union, were observed. At the time of follow-up, seven out of ten patients were mobile and subjectively satisfied in regards to their outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a small number of cases, we were able to show for the first time that the use of orthogonal double plating is not associated with an increased rate of complications in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures and stable components. Moreover, orthogonal double plating can be used successfully as a salvage procedure. At the time of follow up, seven out of ten patients were mobile. More cases must be investigated to validate our findings.

A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal plate fixation is a crucial factor in osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femur fractures. Stability and strength of different fixation concepts for proximal plate fixation were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve fresh frozen, bone mineral density matched human femora, instrumented with cemented hip endoprosthesis were osteotomized simulating a Vancouver B1 fracture. Specimens were instrumented with locking compression plates, fixed proximally with either locking attachment plate (LAP), monocortical screws, cerclage plus monocortical screws (1cerclage) or cerclages only (4cerclages). Cyclic testing was performed with monotonically increasing load until failure. Relative movements at the proximal plate-femur interface were registered by motion tracking.

RESULTS

The LAP construct exhibited a significantly longer cumulative survival (failure criterion 1mm separation at the proximal plate fixation) compared to the monocortical (p=0.048) and 4cerclages constructs (p=0.012) but not to 1cerclage constructs.

CONCLUSION

Bicortical screw anchorage improves proximal plate fixation in periprosthetic fractures. The cerclage-screw combination is a valuable alternative especially in osteoporotic bone.

Superior outcome of strut allograft-augmented plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the outcome of two surgical approaches for treating femoral periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem. The hypothesis was that plate fixation alone might be associated with a higher complication rate due to insufficient mechanical stability. We also considered that the addition of a strut allograft would contribute to fracture healing by means of osteoconduction.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the outcome of 21 patients who sustained periprosthetic fractures around a total hip replacement system (Vancouver type B1 and type C fractures) and who were treated in our department (January 2006 and August 2011) either by plate fixation alone or by plate fixation and a strut allograft. The mean postoperative follow-up was 23 months (range 9-69 months). Eleven patients were treated by plate fixation alone (Plate Group), and 10 patients were treated by plate fixation and a deep frozen cortical strut allograft (AG Group). Functional outcome was rated by the Harris Hip scoring system. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for evidence of fracture union. Surgical failure was defined as any complication requiring surgical revision.

RESULTS

The 21 patients included 17 females and 4 males. The average age was 79 years (range, 73-88) for the Plate Group and 82 years (range, 53-94) for the AG Group, and the average time to fracture union was 12 weeks (range, 2.5-6 months) and 12.95 weeks (range, 1.5-3) respectively. The overall failure rate was significantly higher in the Plate Group: 5 of them required revision surgery compared to none in the AG Group (p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis indicate that a strut allograft augmentation approach to Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic fractures results in a better outcome than plate fixation alone by apparently adding mechanical stability and enhancing the biological healing process.

Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation

PURPOSE

Fractures of the femur associated with total hip arthroplasty are a significant concern in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. However, little is known about the different biomechanical properties of internal fixation systems in combination with periprosthetic fractures. In this study two new internal fixation systems for periprosthetic fractures are investigated using a cadaver fracture model simulating a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fracture.

METHODS

Nine pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were scanned by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Cementless total hip prostheses were implanted and a periprosthetic femur fracture was simulated. Fractures were randomly fixed either with the fixed angle locking attachment plate (LAP®, Depuy Synthes®, Solothurn, Switzerland) or the variable angle non-contact bridging plate (NCB®, Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland). Each construct was cyclically loaded to failure in axial compression.

RESULTS

Axial stiffness and cycles to failure were significantly higher in the NCB group. Both systems were able to be fixed well around the femoral stem.

CONCLUSION

The two different internal fixation systems for periprosthetic fractures differed significantly in our setup. The non-contact bridging plate system revealed significantly higher failure load and may be the preferred option where high stability and load capacity is needed right after operation.

What is the risk of stress risers for interprosthetic fractures of the femur? A biomechanical analysis

PURPOSE

Due to increasing life expectancy we see a rising number of joint replacements. Along with the proximal prosthesis in the femur, more and more people have a second implant on the distal ipsilateral side. This might be a retrograde nail or a locking plate to treat distal femur fractures or a constrained knee prosthesis in the case of severe arthrosis. All these constructs can lead to fractures between the implants. The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk of stress risers for interprosthetic fractures of the femur.

METHODS

Thirty human cadaveric femurs were divided into five groups: (1) femurs with a prosthesis on the proximal side only, (2) hip prosthesis on the proximal end and a distal femur nail, (3) femurs with both a hip prosthesis and a constrained knee prosthesis, (4) femurs with a hip prosthesis on the proximal side and a 4.5-mm distal femur locking plate; the locking plate was 230 mm in length, with ten holes in the shaft, and (5) femurs with a proximal hip prosthesis and a 4.5-mm distal femur locking plate; the locking plate was 342 mm in length, with 16 holes in the shaft.

RESULTS

Femurs with a hip prosthesis and knee prosthesis showed significantly higher required fracture force compared to femurs with a hip prosthesis and a distal retrograde nail. Femurs with a distal locking plate of either length showed a higher required fracture force than those with the retrograde nail.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest risk for a fracture in the femur with an existing hip prosthesis comes with a retrograde nail. A distal locking plate for the treatment of supracondylar fractures leads to a higher required fracture force. The implantation of a constrained knee prosthesis that is not loosened on the ipsilateral side does not increase the risk for a fracture.