How does mobility and urban environment affect the migrants' settlement intention? A perspective from the intergenerational differences

Introduction

With China embracing a new people-centered urbanization stage, the problem of migrants "flowing without moving" has become increasingly prominent, and settlement intention has gradually garnered attention.

Methods

Our research, based on questionnaire data from the China Labor Force Dynamic Survey 2016, uses a multilevel linear regression model to explore the influence of mobility, social environment, built environment, and demographics characteristics on settlement intention in the migrants and discusses differences between settlement intention of new and old generations and their internal influence mechanism.

Results

The findings are as follows: (1) Compared to the old generation, the new migrant generation generally has higher settlement intention. (2) The migrants' settlement intention is influenced mainly by mobility, social environment, built environment, and demographic characteristics. (3) For the new migrant generation, social and demographic characteristics significantly influence their settlement intention. (4) The floating and built environment of the old generation significantly influence their settlement intention.

Discussion

Finally, this paper argues that there are differences in the influence mechanism of the same factors on the settlement intention of the new and old generations of migrants. It proposes differentiated policy suggestions for the migrants to promote city social integration. Finally, this paper argues that there are differences in the influence mechanism of the same factors on the settlement intention of the new and old generations of migrants. It proposes differentiated policy suggestions for the migrants to promote city social integration.

Inspiromatic-safety and efficacy study of a new generation dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Dry powder inhalers (DPI) are effective but forceful inhalation required to fluidize the powder may be difficult for children and patients with airway disease. Inspiromatic is a new generation active DPI that actively suspends drugs in synchrony with inhalation. We evaluated safety and efficacy of Formoterol delivery via Inspiromatic, compared to Aerolizer, a conventional DPI, in pediatric asthmatic subjects.

METHODS

A phase I/II, randomized, single-center, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Subjects aged 8-18 years with FEV₁ 40-80% predicted were included. Patients were randomized to inhale Formoterol via the Inspiromatic, immediately followed by the placebo via the Aerolizer or vice versa, in a double-blind fashion. Spirometry, blood pressure, and heart rate were measured at baseline and 15, 30, and 60 min after drug administration. Capsule emptying, comfort of use, confidence in efficacy, and patient satisfaction were assessed. At a subsequent visit, three months later, patients inhaled the active drug via the other DPI.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients, aged 12.6 (±2.3) years, mean (SD), completed the study. Baseline FEV₁ was 69.1 (±6.7) % at visit one and 65.3 (±9) % at visit two. Maximal FEV₁ increase was 16.6 (±7.1) % with Inspiromatic and 15.5 (±7.5) % with Aerolizer (P = 0.47). No differences in heart rate or blood pressure were observed; 24/28 capsules were emptied using the Inspiromatic and 19/28 with the Aerolizer (P = 0.5); 21/28 preferred the Inspiromatic and 7/28 the Aerolizer (P < 0.001). There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol inhalation via the Inspiromatic is safe and as efficacious as with the Aerolizer. The device is well accepted by asthmatic subjects.