Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement

Fracture of femoral neck in modular total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral stems have the advantage of anatomic hip reconstruction by restoring the femoral offset thus minimising the bearing surface wear, implant loosening and dislocation.

AIM

This study aims to investigate the existing literature on modular neck fractures, to identify predisposing factors and guide the decision-making process in the management of these difficult cases.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted until July 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed, eligibility criteria were set, and methodology assessment of included studies was conducted based on MINORS criteria, size and primary outcome. Data were extracted and analysed thoroughly.

RESULTS

5657 studies were initially screened; the full texts of 124 records were assessed and finally, 32 reports were included. There were 7 clinical studies and 25 case reports. A total of 4825 patients (5204 hips) with a mean age 62.38 years and a mean BMI 29.06 kg/m2 were analysed in the 7 clinical studies. The reported overall weighted revision rate was 0.86%, while the weighted mean modular neck fracture rate was 0.26%. The usual history was sudden experience of hip pain and instability. The average time interval to neck fracture was 4.57 (range 3-4.7) years and a long modular neck was identified in 91.17% of them. Data from case reports showed a mean age and average BMI of 55.85 and 31.63 kg/m2. 82.35% of the patients were male. Necks were fractured after an average time interval of 64.5 ± 8.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of modular neck fracture is significant. The profile of a male, obese patient with a long modular neck increased risk of neck fracture. Microstructural investigation of the retrieved implants demonstrated a higher incidence of fracture line in the base of the neck junction and at its anterolateral distal part. Surgeons should be aware of this complication while using or revising such protheses.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Dual-Modular Versus Single-Modular Stems for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Survival Analysis

Background and Objectives: Increased revision rate of dual-modular (DM) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of modular-neck breakage and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to additional junction damage products is well established and some designs have been recalled from the market. However, some long-term studies of specific DM stems did not confirm the inferiority of these stems compared to standard single-modular (SM) stems, and a head-to-head comparison THA is missing. The objectives of this multicentre study were to determine the survivorship and complication rates of a common DM stem design compared to a similar SM stem. Materials and Methods: In a time frame from January 2012 to November 2015, a cohort of 807 patients (882 hips) consecutively underwent primary cementless THAs at two orthopaedic centres. 377 hips were treated with a Zweimüller-type DM stem THA system and 505 hips with a similar SM stem THA system, both including a modern press-fit acetabulum. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and complication rates were compared between both groups in a median follow-up of 9.0 years (maximum, 9.9 years). Results: The 9-year survivorship of the DM stem THA system (92.6%, 95% CI 89.9-95.3) was significantly lower than that of the SM stem THA system (97.0%, 95% CI 95.2-98.8). There were no differences in revision rates for septic loosening, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures between the two groups. One ceramic inlay and one Ti-alloy modular neck breakage occurred in the DM stem THA system group, but the main reason for revision in this group was aseptic loosening of components. Conclusions: The survivorship of the DM stem THA system was lower than the similar SM stem THA system in a comparable clinical environment with long-term follow-up. Our results confirmed that no rationale for stem modularity exists in primary THAs.

Interchangeable neck failures of bi-modular femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty cannot be predicted from serum trace element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Revision of a well-fixed stem due to unexpected modular neck fracture is a catastrophe for the patient and a challenge for the surgeon. This study aimed to test the possibility of predicting interchangeable neck fracture from serum levels of the stem/neck alloy-consisting metals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients at high risk for interchangeable neck fracture were randomly selected out of a cohort of 680 bimodular stems made from Ti6Al4V alloy. Serum levels of titanium, aluminium and vanadium were determined. Nine age- and gender-matched patients were used as controls.

RESULTS

Mean serum levels of Ti were 6.04 ± 2.52 μg/L, of Al 3.89 ± 1.68 μg/L and of V 0.07 ± 0.04 μg/L in the high-risk group, and 8.22 ± 4.74 μg/L, 4.99 ± 3.98 μg/L and 0.27 ± 0.44 μg/L in the low-risk group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups.

DISCUSSION

Interchangeable neck fracture of bimodular femoral stems cannot be predicted from serum trace element analysis.

How to proceed with asymptomatic modular dual taper hip stems in the case of acetabular revision

How to proceed with a clinically asymptomatic modular Metha® Ti alloy stem with dual taper CoCr neck adapter in case of acetabular revision? To systematically answer this question the status of research and appropriate diagnostic methods in context to clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic dual taper stem-neck couplings has been evaluated based on a systematic literature review. A retrieval analysis of thirteen Metha® modular dual taper CoCr/Ti alloy hip stems has been performed and a rational decision making model as basis for a clinical recommendation was developed. From our observations we propose that in cases of acetabular revision, that for patients with a serum cobalt level of > 4 µg/L and a Co/Cr ratio > 3.6, the revision of the modular dual taper stem may be considered. Prior to acetabular revision surgery a systematic diagnostic evaluation should be executed, using specific tests such as serum metal (Co, Cr) ion analysis, plain antero-posterior and lateral radiographs and cross-sectional imaging modalities (Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging). For an asymptomatic Metha® dual taper Ti alloy/CoCr stem-neck coupling at the stage of acetabular revision careful clinical decision making according to the proposed model should be followed and overreliance on any single examination should be avoided, considering the complete individual differential diagnosis and patient situation.

[Mid- and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis in 354 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mid- and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis.

METHODS

A clinical data of 354 patients (384 hips) with hip disease who underwent THA with Ribbed femoral stem prostheses between October 2006 and May 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 171 males and 183 females, with an average age of 53.4 years (range, 20-82 years). There were 324 cases of single hip and 30 cases of bilateral hips. The cause of THA included the avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 151 cases (159 hips), hip osteoarthritis in 134 cases (136 hips), rheumatoid arthritis in 43 cases (43 hips), ankylosing spondylitis in 20 cases (40 hips), and trauma in 6 cases (6 hips). The Harris score of total 354 patients before operation was 42.34±8.89. Harris scores were used to evaluate hip function after operation. X-ray films were used to determine the length of the lower limb, the radiolucent line on the femur side, the stability of the prosthesis, and the occurrence of stress shielding.

RESULTS

The incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2-11 years with an average of 7.4 years. The Harris score at last follow-up was 80.52±7.61, which significantly increased when compared with preoperative score ( t=134.804, P=0.000). Two cases (2 hips) of prosthetic infections, 3 cases (3 hips) of prothesis loosening, and 4 cases (4 hips) of periprosthetic fractures, and 48 cases (48 hips) of mild to moderate thigh pain occurred after operation. X-ray films showed 76 cases (78 hips) with radiolucent lines on the femur side and stress shielding. According to the Engh's method, there were 364 hips of bone ingrowth, 15 hips of fibrosis ingrowth, and 5 hips of prosthesis instability. The femoral stem subsidence occurred in 25 cases (25 hips), and the difference in leg length discrepancy was more than 10 mm in 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

THA with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis can achieve satisfactory effectiveness with good initial stability and rapid bone growth. The incidence of stress shielding is relatively high, but the stress shielding has no significant impact on the mid- and long-term survival rate and effectiveness of femoral prosthesis.

High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral trunnions enable the surgeon to independently adjust offset, leg length, and anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, modularity may result in an increased risk of fretting and corrosion along with a higher risk of implant dissociation or fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term survivorship of THAs using a cementless modular system.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 221 patients who underwent a primary THA using the ALFA II modular stem by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2004 were reviewed. Survivorship of the ALFA II modular hip system was evaluated at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, 28 (12.7%) died from causes unrelated to the surgery before adequate follow-up, and 64 (29.0%) patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 129 patients had a mean 6.5-year (range: 5-8 years) follow-up. All-cause survivorship of the modular stem system was 81% (95% confidence interval = 69-90) at a mean 6.5-year follow-up. Of the 25 (19.4%) cases requiring revision surgery, 52.0% was for dissociation of the modular components, 32.0% was for fracture of the prosthesis, 12.0% was for instability/multiple dislocations, and 4.0% was for chronic septic THA. Body mass index (odds ratio = 1.080) and offset (odds ratio = 1.254) were independent risk factors for mechanical failures of the modular stem system.

CONCLUSION

The modular stem hip system of interest in this study demonstrates a high failure rate at mid-term follow-up, and we caution against the use of similar designs in primary THAs.

What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia

BACKGROUND

Femoral stems with bimodular (head-neck as well as neck-body) junctions were designed to help surgeons address patients' hip anatomy individually. However, arthroplasty registers have reported higher revision rates in stems with bimodular junctions than in stems with modularity limited to the head-neck trunnion. However, to our knowledge, no epidemiologic study has identified patient-specific risk factors for modular femoral neck fractures, and some stems using these designs still are produced and marketed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to establish the survival rate free from aseptic loosening of one widely used bimodular THA design; (2) to define the proportion of patients who experienced a fracture of the stem's modular femoral neck; and (3) to determine factors associated with neck fracture.

METHODS

In this retrospective, nationwide, multicenter study, we reviewed 2767 bimodular Profemur® Z stems from four hospitals in Slovenia with a mean followup of 8 years (range, 3 days to 15 years). Between 2002 and 2015, the four participating hospitals performed 26,132 primary THAs; this implant was used in 2767 of them (11%). The general indications for using this implant were primary osteoarthritis (OA) in 2198 (79%) hips and other indications in 569 (21%) hips. We followed patients from the date of the index operation to the date of death, date of revision, or the end of followup on March 1, 2018. We believe that all revisions would be captured in our sample, except for patients who may have emigrated outside the country, but the proportion of people immigrating to Slovenia is higher than the proportion of those emigrating from it; however, no formal accounting for loss to followup is possible in a study of this design. There were 1438 (52%) stems implanted in female and 1329 (48%) in male patients, respectively. A titanium alloy neck was used in 2489 hips (90%) and a cobalt-chromium neck in 278 (10%) hips. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of operation was 29 kg/m (SD ± 5 kg/m). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to establish survival rates, and we performed a chart review to determine the proportion of patients who experienced femoral neck fractures. A binary logistic regression model that controlled for the potential confounding variables of age, sex, BMI, time since implantation, type of bearing, diagnosis, hospital, neck length, and neck material was used to analyze neck fractures.

RESULTS

There were 55 (2%) aseptic stem revisions. Survival rate free from aseptic loosening at 12 years was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 1%). Fracture of the modular neck occurred in 23 patients (0.83%) with a mean BMI of 29 kg/m (SD ± 4 kg/m.) Twenty patients with neck fractures were males and 19 of 23 fractured necks were long. Time since implantation (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% CI 0.46-0.66; p < 0.001), a long neck (OR, 6.77; 95% CI, 2.1-22.2; p = 0.002), a cobalt-chromium alloy neck (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.6-21.1; p = 0.008), younger age (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96; p < 0.001), and male sex (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.04-14.55; p = 0.043) were factors associated with neck fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The loosening and neck fracture rates of the Profemur® Z stem were lower than in some of previously published series. However, the use of modular femoral necks in primary THA increases the risk for neck fracture, particularly in young male patients with cobalt-chromium long femoral necks. The bimodular stem we analyzed fractured unacceptably often, especially in younger male patients. For most patients, the risks of using this device outweigh the benefits, and several dozen patients had revisions and complications they would not have had if a different stem had been used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Modular femoral neck failure after revision of a total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

The authors report on a case of modular femoral neck fracture which appeared 21 months after revision of acetabular component. The revision surgery was performed 8 years after the primary total hip arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. During acetabular revision, the primary implanted short (S, - 3.5 mm) femoral head was also exchanged with extra-long (XL, + 7.0 mm) femoral head fitting the modular femoral neck with a longer lever arm. Numerical analysis has shown that this has resulted in a 19.9% increase in tensile stress at the neck-stem coupling during normal walking cycle. This could result in microcrack initiation and propagation and finally lead to modular neck failure of the otherwise well-fixed stem. Surgeons should avoid excessive loading of the exchangeable neck (dual-modular) femoral stem designs as the stem-neck couplings are subject to corrosion and are not as reliable as monoblock stems.

Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

The objective was to assess aseptic complications and functional outcome using a primary total hip arthroplasty with modular neck.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of 317 consecutive patients. The mean age was 61.1 (range, 41-84) years. The H-Max-M model (Lima, Italy) system was used in all patients. The functional assessment was made by the Harris Hip Score, Short Form-36 (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological outcomes were also assessed, and adverse events and complications were noted.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 6.1 (range, 2-8) years. Functional outcome significantly improved in most patients. There were 3 deep infections (0.9%) and 17 aseptic complications (5.3%) including 1 intraoperative acetabular fracture, 3 later periprosthetic femoral fractures, 1 broken ceramic insert, 1 acetabular loosening, 3 femoral loosening and 1 broken titanium modular neck in a obese patient. No pseudotumors or elevated serum levels of metal ions were found among the patients with radiolucent lines or aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in the present study showed that the H-MAX-M stem provided satisfactory functional outcome in most patients with a low rate of complications attributable to the modular neck design. We consider that using this novel modular neck-stem coupling design can be an alternative to the conventional monoblock stems in patients without overweight.

Excellent mid-term results of a new polished tapered modular cemented stem: a study of 113 hip replacements with minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

This prospective cohort study reports the medium-term clinical and radiographic results of 113 hips treated with a hybrid total hip replacement (THR) with a new cemented tapered cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) stem with a titanium (Ti) modular neck (ProfemurXm®).

METHOD

Between October 2008 and December 2010 we performed 115 consecutive hybrid THR with the ProfemurXm® in 105 patients.

RESULTS

Survivorship of the implant (stem and modular neck) at a mean of 6.5 years (min 5-max 8) was 100% with the endpoint revision for any reason. No implant was at risk for revision or showed signs of loosening. The mean Harris Hip Score was 89/100, mean Oxford Hip Score was 43/48, mean WOMAC was 91/100. No patient had thigh pain, no patient reported squeaking. There were no dislocations in this cohort. No implant showed development of radiolucent lines (RLL), either at the stem-cement or cement-bone interface. No hip showed osteolysis or calcar resorption. The mean femoral subsidence of the stem within the cement mantel was 0.31 mm (range 0-0.6 mm) after 6.5 years. With the use of this modular stem, 93% of hips showed no measurable leg length difference after THR, and leg length could be restored within a 5-mm limit in 99% of hips.

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term results of this new polished stem were excellent, without adverse effects from the use of modularity.

Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients

BACKGROUND

Exchangeable neck stems, defined as those with a dual taper (that is, a modular junction between the femoral head and the femoral neck and an additional junction between the neck and the stem body), were introduced in THA to improve restoration of joint biomechanics (restoring anteversion, offset, and limb length) and reduce the risk of dislocation. However exchangeable necks have been reported to result in adverse effects such as stem fractures and acute local tissue reaction. Whether they result in a net improvement to or impairment of reconstructive survivorship remains controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To compare the prosthetic survivorship and all-cause revision risk of exchangeable femoral neck THAs versus fixed neck THAs, taking known prosthetic revision risk factors into account; and (2) to compare the cause-specific revision risk of exchangeable femoral neck THAs versus fixed neck THAs, adjusting for known prosthetic risk factors.

METHODS

Using French national health-insurance databases, we identified all French patients older than 40 years who underwent primary THA from 2009 through 2012. To ensure accuracy of the data, we considered only beneficiaries of the general insurance scheme (approximately 77% of the population). Characteristics of the prosthesis and the patients receiving an exchangeable femoral neck THA were compared with those receiving a fixed femoral neck THA (defined as femoral stem with only the head being exchangeable). Revision was the event of interest. Followup started on the date the THA was performed, until the patient experienced revision, died, was lost to followup, or until the followup period ended (December 31, 2014), whichever came first. Competing risk THA survivorship was calculated and compared (purpose 1), as were cause-specific Cox regression models (purpose 2). The study cohort included 324,108 individuals with a mean age of 77 years. A total of 24% underwent THA for acute trauma, and 3% of the group received an exchangeable neck THA. During the median 45-month followup (mean, 42 months; minimum, 1 day; maximum, 6 years), 11,968 individuals underwent prosthetic revision.

RESULTS

The cumulative revision incidence was 6.5% (95% CI, 5.8%-7.3%) for exchangeable neck THAs versus 4.7% (95% CI, 4.6%-4.8%) for fixed neck THAs (p < 0.001). After controlling for potential confounding variables including age, sex, comorbidities, indication for THA, cementation, bearing surface, and the characteristics of the center where the implantation was performed, we found that the exchangeable femoral neck THA was associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of revision of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.14-1.38; p < 0.001) compared with the fixed neck THA. When dealing with cause-specific revision, exchangeable neck THAs had a higher incidence of revision for implant failure or periprosthetic fracture, and for mechanical complications; adjusted HRs were, respectively, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.24-2.27; p < 0.001) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13-1.43; p < 0.001), for exchangeable neck THAs compared with fixed ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Exchangeable neck THAs had poorer survivorship independent of other prosthetic revision risk factors. Accordingly, expected anatomic and functional benefits should be carefully assessed before choosing this design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

A Single-Center Experience With a Titanium Modular Neck Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Added modular junction has been associated with implant-related failures. We report our experience with a titanium-titanium modular neck-stem interface to assess complications, possible clinical factors influencing use of neck modularity, and whether modularity reduced the incidence of dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 809 total hip arthroplasties completed between 2005 and 2012 from a prospectively collected database were reviewed. The mean follow-up interval was 5.7 years (3.3-10.3 years). Forty-five percent were male (360 of 809), and 55% were female (449 of 809). All stems were uncemented PROFEMUR TL (titanium, flat-tapered, wedge) or PROFEMUR Z (titanium, rectangular, dual-tapered) with a titanium neck.

RESULTS

Increased modularity (anteverted/retroverted and anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus (anteverted/retroverted + anteverted/retroverted varus/valgus) was used in 39.4% (135 of 343) of cases using the posterior approach compared with 6.8% (20 of 293) of anterior and 23.7% (41 of 173) of lateral approaches. Four males sustained neck fractures at a mean of 95.5 months (69.3-115.6 months) after primary surgery. Overall dislocation rate was 1.1% (9 of 809). The posterior approach had both the highest utilization of increased modularity and the highest dislocation rate (2.3%), of which the most were recurrent. The anterior (0.3%) and lateral (0%) approaches had lower dislocation rates with no recurrences.

CONCLUSION

At a mean 5.7 years, our experience demonstrates a low neck fracture (0.5%) and a low dislocation rate (1.1%). Use of increased modularity may not improve dislocation risk for the posterior approach. Continued surveillance of this group will be necessary to determine long term survivorship of this modular titanium implant.

Conversion Hip Arthroplasty in Failed Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Conversion hip arthroplasty is a salvage procedure for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. However, the technical difficulties and perioperative morbidity of conversion arthroplasty are uncertain.

METHODS

We compared the type of arthroplasty (total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty), operative parameters, perioperative morbidity, 1-year mortality, implant stability, and clinical results of 33 conversion hip arthroplasties due to a failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture with those of a matched control group of 33 primary hip arthroplasties due to the same fracture. Propensity score was used for the control matching of gender, age, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Total hip arthroplasty was more frequently performed in the conversion group (10/33) compared to the primary group (3/33) (P = .016). The operation time, perioperative blood loss, amount of transfusion, and risk of femoral fracture during the operation were increased in the conversion group. The overall 1-year mortality was 3% (1 patient) in the conversion group and 9% (3 patients) in the primary group (P = .307). At a mean of 3-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical results and none of the implants were loose in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, conversion hip arthroplasty should be planned and executed, bearing in mind the increased operative morbidities corresponding to operation time, perioperative blood loss, requirement of transfusion, and intraoperative femoral fracture.

Metal ion levels in ceramic-on-ceramic THR with cobalt-chrome modular necks: analysis of cobalt and chromium serum levels in 23 healthy hip patients

BACKGROUND

Modular necks in total hip replacement (THR) can be a source of metal ion release.

METHODS

We measured the level of cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ions in the serum of 23 healthy volunteers with a well-functioning ceramic-on-ceramic THR of a particular design, containing a cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) stem and a Co-Cr modular neck.

RESULTS

Average Co in serum was 1,71 µg/l; median Co was 1.50 µg/l. No patient had Co levels higher than 3.70 µg/l. Average Cr level was 0.49 µg/l; in all but one patient Cr was below the detection limit (<0.50 µg/l). Co was higher for varus necks compared to all other subtypes: 2.14 µg/l vs 1.58 µg/l (p<0.05). The same system with Titanium modular necks shows lower Co serum levels: 1.26 µg/l (p<0.01 ). In conclusion, the hybrid THR Profemur Xm® - Procotyle L® with a Co-Cr modular neck on a Co-Cr stem design shows very low Cr ion serum levels in a randomly selected group of well-functioning hip patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Co ion serum levels are low, but significantly higher for 8° varus necks, and Co levels are significantly higher than values of this system with a Titanium modular neck.

A biomechanical testing system to determine micromotion between hip implant and femur accounting for deformation of the hip implant: Assessment of the influence of rigid body assumptions on micromotions measurements

BACKGROUND

Accurate pre-clinical evaluation of the initial stability of new cementless hip stems using in vitro micromotion measurements is an important step in the design process to assess the new stem's potential. Several measuring systems, linear variable displacement transducer-based and other, require assuming bone or implant to be rigid to obtain micromotion values or to calculate derived quantities such as relative implant tilting.

METHODS

An alternative linear variable displacement transducer-based measuring system not requiring a rigid body assumption was developed in this study. The system combined advantages of local unidirectional and frame-and-bracket micromotion measuring concepts. The influence and possible errors that would be made by adopting a rigid body assumption were quantified. Furthermore, as the system allowed emulating local unidirectional and frame-and-bracket systems, the influence of adopting rigid body assumptions were also analyzed for both concepts. Synthetic and embalmed bone models were tested in combination with primary and revision implants. Single-legged stance phase loading was applied to the implant - bone constructs.

FINDINGS

Adopting a rigid body assumption resulted in an overestimation of mediolateral micromotion of up to 49.7μm at more distal measuring locations. Maximal average relative rotational motion was overestimated by 0.12° around the anteroposterior axis. Frontal and sagittal tilting calculations based on a unidirectional measuring concept underestimated the true tilting by an order of magnitude.

INTERPRETATION

Non-rigid behavior is a factor that should not be dismissed in micromotion stability evaluations of primary and revision femoral implants.

Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty

When performing cementless hip arthroplasty, it is critical to achieve firm primary mechanical stability followed by biological fixation. In order to achieve this, it is essential to fully understand characteristics of implant design. In this review, the authors review fixation principles for a variety of implants used for cementless hip replacement and considerations for making an optimal selection.

Thirteen year follow-up of a cementless femoral stem and a threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than fifty years of age

PURPOSE

Compared to older patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) younger patients are considered to be more active, thereby exposing the implant to significantly higher loads over a much longer period of time. Additionally, cases of secondary osteoarthritis caused by hip dysplasia, femoral head necrosis or rheumatic diseases are much more frequent than among the average patient population. Therefore, durable implant fixation and low wear rates are extremely important to achieve good long-term implant survival in this group of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term survival of a cementless femoral stem (Zweymüller® SL stem) and a threaded cup (Bicon SL®) in patients younger than 50 years of age.

METHODS

Therefore, a consecutive series of 100 patients (111 hips) aged 50 years or younger (range: 30 to 50 years) was analysed at a mean follow up of 13.5 years. Follow-up assessment included physical examination and radiographic workup. Hip disability osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS) and Harris hip score (HHS) were used to evaluate the pre- and post-operative functional outcome, respectively. Patient satisfaction with the surgical result was assessed by standardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate with any revision as endpoint was 96.8 % (95 % CI: 90.5 % to 98.9 %) at ten years. Gender, operation time and the occurence of osteolyses had no influence on joint function or patient satisfaction. We recorded an overall failure rate of 7.4 % (six cases). In four cases (5 %) the prosthesis had to be revised due to aseptic loosening of the cup after 12 years, eight years, 12 years and 11 years, in one case (1.2 %) recurrent luxation led to a revision operation (acetabular cup and head) after three years of primary implantation. In one case an implant failure was recorded (acetabular cup breakage after eight years of implantation). We recorded the occurence of asymptomatic radiolucent lines of the cup in 21 % and of the stem in 35 % in our series. The HOOS was influenced by the presence or abscence of radiolucent lines of the stem. Patients with radiolucent lines of the stem had a median HOOS score of (74 points) compared to those without radiolucent lines (89 points). Other factors, such as "diagnosis led to operation" and "previous operations" had no influence on the HHS and HOOS.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates excellent long-term survival of cementless femoral stem in combination with a threaded cup in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Novel chitosan/diclofenac coatings on medical grade stainless steel for hip replacement applications

Corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, improved osteointegration, as well the prevention of inflammation and pain are the most desired characteristics of hip replacement implants. In this study we introduce a novel multi-layered coating on AISI 316LVM stainless steel that shows promise with regard to all mentioned characteristics. The coating is prepared from alternating layers of the biocompatible polysaccharide chitosan and the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), diclofenac. Electrochemical methods were employed to characterize the corrosion behavior of coated and uncoated samples in physiological solution. It is shown that these coatings improve corrosion resistance. It was also found that these coatings release the incorporated drug in controlled, multi-mechanism manner. Adding additional layers on top of the as-prepared samples, has potential for further tailoring of the release profile and increasing the drug dose. Biocompatibility was proven on human-derived osteoblasts in several experiments. Only viable cells were found on the sample surface after incubation of the samples with the same cell line. This novel coating could prove important for prolongation of the application potential of steel-based hip replacements, which are these days often replaced by more expensive ceramic or other metal alloys.

Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Formation in the Human Femoral Neck

PURPOSE

Teriparatide (TPTD) improves bone mass and microstructure resulting in reduced risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. However, hip bone mineral density improvements are modest and there are no data confirming that TPTD reduces hip fracture risk. To study the effects of TPTD on the proximal femur, we performed a double-blind trial of TPTD vs placebo (PBO) in patients with osteoarthritis from whom femoral neck (FN) samples were obtained at total hip replacement (THR) surgery.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive TPTD or PBO for an average of 40 days before THR. Double tetracycline labeling was initiated 21 days prior to THR to allow histomorphometric assessment of bone formation. During the THR, an intact sample of the FN was procured, fixed, and sectioned transversely. Serum levels of bone turnover markers were measured at baseline and during the THR. Standard histomorphometric parameters were measured and calculated on four bone envelopes (cancellous, endocortical, intracortical, and periosteal). The primary outcome measure was bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS).

RESULTS

Forty individuals were enrolled (25 women, mean age, 71.5 ± 8.0 y and 15 men, mean age, 68.9 ± 7.7 y). In cancellous and endocortical envelopes, BFR/BS was 100% higher in the TPTD vs PBO group (P < .05). Bone turnover markers measured at the time of THR correlated with BFR/BS.

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD stimulates bone formation rapidly in cancellous and endocortical envelopes of the FN. Our findings provide a mechanistic basis for TPTD-mediated improvement in FN bone mass and ultimately hip strength. This study is the first demonstration of the effect of any osteoporosis medication on osteoblast activity in the human proximal femur.