Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position

A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Supine and Lateral Patient Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Surgical Approach

Background

To determine any differences in clinical outcomes between patients in the supine vs the lateral position during anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 368 patients undergoing THA via the ABMS approach (201 lateral vs 167 supine position) at our institution (2015-2019) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Inclusion criteria were all patients undergoing primary THA. Exclusion criteria were any revision surgeries and patients who did not undergo the ABMS THA. Outcomes assessed were postoperative complication rates, ambulation distance, length of stay, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, stiffness, and physical function scores at 3 time periods (preoperative, 3 months postoperative, and 1 year postoperative).

Results

The supine group had significantly greater postoperative day 0 ambulation distance (150 vs 60 meters; P < .001), while no difference was observed on postoperative day 1 (210 meters in supine vs 200 in lateral; P = .921). Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the supine group (1; interquartile range 0-1) with respect to the lateral group (1; interquartile range 0-2; P < .001). The in-hospital complication rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), return to operating room rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), and readmission rates (5.4% in supine vs 5.0% in lateral; P = .631) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were observed across any Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores.

Conclusions

Both supine and lateral patient positioning provide acceptable early surgical outcomes, suggesting that satisfactory results can be obtained via both positions in THAs.

Impact of surgical approaches on stem position and hidden blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive vs. posterolateral

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach impacts the outcomes and recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and approaches may affect the stem positioning. Contrary to the general concept of minimally invasive surgery, the direct anterior approach (DAA) results in more intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare stem positioning and hidden blood loss (HBL) among three surgical approaches: the minimally invasive DAA, Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen (OCM), and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA).

METHODS

A total of 201 patients undergoing their first non-cemented THA using the DAA, OCM, and PLA were included in the study. General demographic data, stem alignment, and blood loss were evaluated. Specific comparison measurements included femoral neck anteversion, femoral stem anteversion, alignment of the stem in coronal and sagittal planes, proximal and distal medullary ratios, and femoral offset. Blood loss was measured by calculating Intraoperative Blood Loss ( IBL), visible blood loss (VBL), and hidden blood loss (HBL).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, or femoral Dorr classification among the three groups. The mean surgical time was longer for the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.01). IBL was highest in the DAA group and lowest in the PLA (P < 0.05). Postoperative stem anteversion were significantly different among the groups, with the DAA showing the greatest anteversion difference (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the stem coronal alignment. However, there were more valgus and varus implants in the sagittal plane for the DAA and OCM. The femoral offset reduction was less optimal in the DAA and OCM groups (P < 0.05). The proximal and distal medullary ratios were lower in the DAA and OCM (P < 0.05). HBL was significantly lower in the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive approaches such as DAA and OCM offer advantages in muscle and soft tissue preservation, leading to reduced HBL compared to the conventional PLA. However, these approaches present challenges in femoral stem positioning and longer surgical times.

Analysis on association between sagittal stem alignment and early functional and radiological outcome following primary cementless total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

Accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and biomechanics is mandatory for achieving good clinical outcomes following total hip replacement (THR). Optimal stem alignment is essential to avoid impingement or loosening. This study aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position following cementless THR and its relationship with patient's functional outcome and post-operative radiological parameters.

METHOD

We performed analytical observational study with cross-sectional design on 71 hips (67 patients, ranged 18-85 years old) that underwent primary cementless THR in two orthopedic centers in Jakarta, Indonesia. All hips were operated through either anterolateral or posterior approach using either extended/full-coating wedge-tapered stem or proximal-coated wedge-tapered stem. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at follow-up time using mHHS questionnaire, VAS level of thigh pain, and hip ROM. Stem sagittal alignment and other radiological parameters, including combined anteversion and offset, were measured from conventional radiograph.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on mHHS score, VAS level on thigh pain, and ROM between stem alignment groups. Post-operative anteversion and offset of the implant were not affected by the stem sagittal position. All influencing factors have significant effect on sagittal stem alignment. Linear regression test on femur morphology showed 0.69° increase in stem posterior tilt for every 1° increase in the anterior bowing (coeff. = 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Stem tilting in sagittal plane did not affect patient's functional outcome or post-operative radiological parameters. In addition, for every degree of increased anterior femoral bowing, 0.69° increase in posterior stem tilting can be expected.

Clinical outcomes following direct anterior approach during total hip arthroplasty without hip extension: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Traditional total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) requires a hip extension. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing THA with DAA using either the no hip extension (NHE) or the traditional hip extension (THE) strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of demographics, clinical and radiological outcomes, and occurrence of complications was performed using data from 123 patients treated between January 2020 and November 2021. The patients were categorised into two groups: NHE (84 patients) and THE (39 patients).

RESULTS

The NHE group exhibited shorter operative time and had more male participants with higher ages. Comparable outcomes were observed in the visual analogue scale, Harris Hip, and Oxford Hip scores at the final follow-up. Furthermore, complications were observed in the NHE and THE groups, including two and one greater trochanteric fractures and three and one transfusions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the THE, employing the NHE strategy during THA with DAA in elderly and young female patients resulted in comparable clinical outcomes with several advantages, such as favourable surgical time. The NHE method also exhibited good safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the NHE strategy may be a favourable option for elderly and young female patients.

First 100 total hip arthroplasties performed by a young surgeon using the direct anterior approach: learning curve and complications

INTRODUCTION

Most of the reported discussions about the learning curve for the direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been by experienced surgeons. The study's aim was to describe the learning curve, short-term outcomes, complications, and adaptations to the DAA used in the first 100 THA cases experienced by a young surgeon who had received DAA training for trauma surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study summarizes the first 100 consecutive cases experienced by a young surgeon who performed the unilateral DAA for THA between 2019 and 2021. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to evaluate the learning curve on the basis of operative time and overall complications. The demographics data, short-term outcomes, and complications of the first 50 and second 50 cases were compared.

RESULTS

The CUSUM curve declined after 49 and 55 cases, measured by operative time and overall complications, respectively. The median operative time (104 vs. 80 min) and intraoperative fluoroscopic time (38 vs. 12 s) increased significantly in the first 50 cases compared with the times in the second 50 cases. Complications tended to occur in the first 50 cases (12% vs. 6%), and the overall rate was 9%. Major complications all occurred in the first 50 cases, with a rate of 4%. Only one case, which involved a complicated periprosthetic fracture around the stem that extended to the tip, required the intervention of a senior surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after receiving training on the DAA for trauma surgeries, the young surgeon experienced a steep learning curve and more complications in the first 50 cases. The DAA for THA is a technically demanding procedure and may require guidance from an experienced surgeon to manage unexpected complications.

Improved surgical exposure and early clinical outcomes using a femoral-release-first technique in direct anterior approach during total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using the direct anterior approach (DAA) has demonstrated favourable early-, mid-, and long-term outcomes. However, the traditional femoral release technique remains technically demanding and is associated with challenges and a heightened risk of complications. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent THA with DAA performed using either the femoral-release-first (FRF) or the traditional approach (TA) strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of demographics, clinical and radiological outcomes, and occurrence of complications was performed using data from 106 patients between 2018 and 2019. The patients were categorised into two groups: FRF (44 hips) and TA (69 hips).

RESULTS

The FRF group showed a reduced operative time, haemoglobin (Hb) drop, postoperative hospital stay, and more optimal acetabular cup anteversion angles. Furthermore, during the first 2 months postoperatively, the FRF group demonstrated superior visual analogue scale, Harris Hip, and Oxford Hip scores. In the TA group, two hips experienced greater trochanter fractures, and one experienced delayed incision healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the TA, employing the FRF strategy during THA with DAA resulted in improved outcomes within the first 2 months postoperatively and comparable functional recovery beyond this period. The FRF method exhibited advantages such as favourable acetabular exposure and alignment and a reduced risk of complications. Therefore, the FRF strategy may be a favourable option.

Comparing the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach with the Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach, which utilizes the interval between the tensor fasciae latae posteriorly, offers several advantages, such as the reduced risk of nerve injury and the freedom to choose various implants. Herein, we aimed to compare the outcome of ABMS to the direct anterior (DA) approach using pairwise meta-analysis techniques. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies published up to 7 June 2023, which compared the ABMS approach with the DA approach for hip arthroplasty. We compared (1) perioperative outcomes (operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total opioid consumption, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the number of patients discharged to their homes); (2) postoperative complications (neuropraxia/nerve injury, dislocation, surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, and reoperation rate); and (3) implant position (cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem alignment). Results: Ten studies were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1737 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with the ABMS approach and 1979 with the DA approach. The pooled analysis showed no differences in all outcome variables, including perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and the implant position between the two surgical approaches. Conclusions: In current meta-analysis, the ABMS approach demonstrated comparable results to the conventional DA approach in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes as well as postoperative complications. Furthermore, the ABMS approach has the advantage of a broader indication and fewer limitations in terms of the surgical position compared to the DA approach. Therefore, the ABMS approach can be even more beneficial as an option within MSA, surpassing the utility of the DA approach.

Direct Anterior Approach Provides Superior Prosthesis Adaptability in the Early Postoperative Period of Total Hip Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

Prosthesis awareness is the perception of foreign bodies, which has a critical effect on the function of the prosthetic joint. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) has more advantages than the posterior approach (PA), including superior rehabilitation outcomes. This study was to evaluate the recovery of "prosthesis awareness" through these two approaches.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-six patients who received THA with either DAA (n = 41) or PA (n = 335) from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Harris hip score (HHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) analyses were used to evaluate the recovery of "prosthesis awareness" in these patients 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The student t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, and MANOVA were used to compare the differences among groups.

RESULTS

We found that DAA patients had higher FJS-12 scores than PA patients at 2 weeks (42.15 ± 3.36 vs. 38.09 ± 3.28, p = 0.042), 1 month (49.06 ± 5.14 vs. 41.11 ± 5.21, p = 0.038), and 3 months (53.23 ± 4.07 vs. 48.09 ± 3.71, t = 3.152, p = 0.045). And the recovery rates of FJS-12 scores in DAA and PA groups at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery were 75.46% ± 6.04%, 84.05% ± 6.57%, 91.37% ± 7.13%, and 74.14% ± 5.54%, 78.16% ± 6.01%, 88.23% ± 6.42%, respectively. To compare the recovery effects of the two procedures in more detail, we classified the 12 items in FJS-12 that evaluate different types of gravity center motions into three categories: low-movement group (LG), middle-movement group (MG), and high-movement group (HG). Interestingly, DAA patients had significantly higher HG than PA patients at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after operation (t = 3.225, p = 0.022 at 2 weeks, t = 3.081, p = 0.041 at 1 month and t = 2.783, p = 0.046 at 3 months), whereas no significant differences were observed in LG- and MG-related items. In addition, there were no significant differences in HHS and VAS scores between DAA and PA patients at 2 weeks (p = 0.102, p = 0.093), or from 1 month to 12 months (each p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DAA-mediated THA is superior to PA in terms of prosthesis adaptability and recovery of hip joint motion in the first 3 months after surgery, especially concerning high-movement gravity center motions.

Femoral nerve status during the anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: Motor-evoked potential analysis and an influencing factor

BACKGROUND

Femoral nerve palsy is an uncommon but serious complication during the anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. One of the reported reasons for femoral nerve palsy is retractor-induced intraoperative damage after retractor placement on the anterior wall of the acetabulum. The present study aimed to clarify the femoral nerve status during anterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty using motor-evoked potential analysis and to identify risk factors influencing the nerve status.

METHODS

From June 2019 to September 2020, 32 hips in 31 patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty via the anterolateral approach. The integrity of the femoral nerve was tested by the motor-evoked potential at three time points: preoperatively as a control (first period), immediately after retractor placement on the anterior wall of the acetabulum (second period), and after the procedure (third period). In the second period, the hips were divided into the following two groups: a <50% femoral nerve amplitude group and a ≥50% group. The iliopsoas muscle volume was evaluated by measuring the muscle cross-sectional area on preoperative computed tomography images, and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean amplitude of the femoral nerve was significantly reduced from 100% in the first period to 35% in the second period (p < 0.01), but then significantly recovered to 54% in the third period (p < 0.01). In 26 (81%) hips, the femoral nerve amplitude was <50% in the second period. The muscle cross-sectional area of the iliopsoas muscle in the <50% group was significantly smaller than that in the ≥50% group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean amplitude of the femoral nerve was significantly reduced to 35% in the second period, and the iliopsoas muscle volume was considered to influence this femoral nerve status.

Short stature and short distance between the anterior acetabular rim to the femoral nerve are risk factors for femoral nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach

BACKGROUND

Nerve palsy following total hip arthroplasty (THA) critically impacts patient clinical function. However, few studies have focused on femoral nerve palsy (FNP) following THA via the modified Watson-Jones approach. Previous reports have suggested that THA, regardless of the approach, is associated with several FNP risk factors, including female gender, hip dysplasia, revision surgery, and short stature. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has suggested that a shorter distance between the femoral nerve and the anterior acetabular edge (dFN) is related to FNP after THA. The purposes of this study were: 1) to determine the presumed risk factors through a retrospective investigation of FNP clinical courses, and 2) to identify the relationships between FNP occurrence and the short dFN following primary THA via the modified Watson-Jones approach.

HYPOTHESIS

Short stature is a risk factor for femoral nerve palsy following THA. i.e. a significant difference in dFN exists between patients with and without FNP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study was performed at a single university hospital. From January 2016 to December 2020, 676 THAs were performed via the modified Watson-Jones approach at our institution. These included 495 THAs performed in the supine position and 181 in the lateral position. In this study, FNP was defined as weakness of the quadriceps femoris (manual muscle test<grade 3) with or without sensory disturbance over the anteromedial aspect of the thigh. The incidence of FNP was calculated. Patient background factors (age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, surgical position, height, weight, body mass index, surgeon experience, type of components, the method of anesthesia, leg lengthening during the surgery, and operation time) were compared between the FNP group and a non-FNP control group. The dFN was measured in T1-weighted MRI axial images at the level of the hip center. The distance between the femoral nerve and the anterior acetabular edges, where retractors are commonly placed during surgery, was also measured and compared between the FNP group and the non-FNP control group. The FNP group and non-FNP control group were extracted by 1:4 matching of patient height and weight. All data were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

FNP occurred in 6 out of 676 joints (0.88%) following primary THA via the modified Watson-Jones approach. In all 6 cases, the motor deficit recovered completely within a year. Patient height was significantly shorter in the FNP group than in the non-FNP control group (148.4±3.3cm vs. 155.4±8.1cm [p=0.01]). The dFN was significantly shorter in the FNP group (16.3±4.1mm vs. 21.5±4.0mm [p=0.034]).

CONCLUSION

Short stature and short dFN are risk factors for FNP after THA using the modified Watson-Jones approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

MRI Findings of Muscle Damage after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Complete Muscle Preserving Anterolateral Supine Approach

Background and Objectives: We performed anterolateral total hip arthroplasty (ALS THA) with the purpose of complete muscle-tendon preservation without muscle-tendon dissection. This study aimed to evaluate muscle damage in the periprosthetic hip joint muscles of patients undergoing ALS THA at 1-year post-operative hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: We evaluated changes in the muscle cross-sectional area (M-CSA) and fatty atrophy of the periprosthetic muscles. We also assessed the Harris hip score on pre-operative and 12-month post-operative MRI in 66 patients who underwent ALS THA. The grade of M-CSA atrophy was classified into no atrophy, slight atrophy, moderate atrophy, and severe atrophy. Fatty atrophy was classified as improved, no change, and worsened using the Goutallier classification. Results: More than 90% of patients’ M-CSA had no atrophy in the obturator internus (Oi), obturator externus (Oe), gluteus medius (Gmed), and gluteus minimus (Gmin), and some improvement was observed in terms of fatty atrophy. In contrast, M-CSA of the tensor fascia latae (TFL) muscle was clearly decreased, and there was no improvement in the TFL fatty atrophy. However, the presence or absence of TFL atrophy did not affect clinical outcome. Conclusions: We performed the complete muscle preserving procedure, ALS THA, with attention to preserving the Oi and Oe by direct visual confirmation and gentle treatment of the Gmed and Gmin with effective retraction. Post-operative M-CSA atrophy evaluation on MRI showed that the Oi, Oe, Gmed, and Gmin were satisfactorily preserved; however, the TFL was clearly atrophic. In the ALS approach, where entry is made between Gmed and TFL, atrophy of the TFL due to superior gluteal nerve injury must be tolerated to some extent.

Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in the supine position: a prospective study based on early postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally anterolateral approach (MAA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) have been reported as beneficial for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to their ability to reduce postoperative pain and lead to quicker rehabilitation by preserving muscle insertions. As there is an ongoing debate on the effect of these two approaches on early postoperative outcomes, this prospective study aimed to assess the difference in early clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients, 50 in the MAA group and 48 in the DAA group, were included in the study. Patients with complete data were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Clinical measurements, including the ability to climb stairs and walk, 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Forgotten Joint Scale (FJS-12), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Hip scores, radiological evaluation, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and implant alignments between MAA and DAA groups. In regards to patient-reported outcomes, the FJS-12 was significantly higher in the MAA group compared to group DAA at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in the FJS-12 between the two groups 12 weeks after surgery. The differences also included shorter operative times (62.4 ± 9.05 min vs. 71 ± 8.01 min), less blood loss (132.6 ± 43.31 ml vs. 159.23 ± 37.25 ml), lower Hb drop (29.56 ± 8.02 g/L vs. 36.4 ± 7.12 g/L), and fewer blood transfusions in the MAA group (4.0% vs. 18.8%). The incidence of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropraxia after surgery was 7 (14.6%) in the DAA group and 0 in the MAA group. One fracture was found in each group and managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

MAA and DAA approach yielded excellent and similar early clinical outcomes. However, better patient-reported outcomes could be achieved by MAA THA. The MAA resulted in a safer approach associated with shorter operative times, less blood loss, lower Hb drop, fewer blood transfusions, and LFCN neuropraxia than DAA. A longer follow-up is needed to further examine differences between these procedures.

Comparison between freehand technique and computed tomography-based navigation in acetabular cup placement through direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), improper cup orientation can result in dislocation, early excessive polyethylene wear, and pain following THA. The supine position during THA provides a more reproducible functional pelvic position than the lateral decubitus position and may allow freehand cup placement as reliable as that obtained by computer navigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of freehand cup placement through a supine direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with computed tomography (CT)-based navigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The same surgeon performed primary cementless THA through the DAA in 144 supine patients. Seventy-two patients underwent freehand cup placement with standard mechanical guidance-oriented radiographic target cup positioning, and 72 underwent placement with CT-based navigation guidance. Using three-dimensional templating software, the study group calculated cup inclination and anteversion on postoperative CT scans.

RESULTS

The navigation method resulted in a significantly smaller deviation of inclination from the target (p < 0.05); the difference in anteversion was not significant. In addition, the navigation method resulted in significantly fewer cups placed ± 10° outside the target position (0% for inclination, 0% for anteversion) than did the freehand procedure (26% for inclination, 25% for anteversion) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Freehand cup placement is less reliable even in the supine position. Use of a CT-based navigation system can significantly improve cup positioning in THA through the DAA by reducing the incidence of outliers.

Patient-reported results of simultaneous direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasties performed in the same patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies have compared clinical results of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the effect of the surgical approach on outcome of THA remains controversial. Most of these studies used two distinct groups of patients, and THAs were performed by different surgeons, using different designs of prosthesis. These confounding factors may limit the strength of the conclusions. The purpose of this prospective, simultaneous bilateral randomized study was to investigate whether patients would perceive the difference between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 20 patients scheduled to undergo same-day bilateral THA between October 2017 and August 2019, one hip was randomly assigned to DAA and the other to PLA. Patient-reported outcome measures [Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), patients' hip pain on mobilization] and physician-assessed measures [Harris Hip Score (HHS), operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cup abduction, cup anteversion, stem orientation, and incidence of complications (intraoperative fracture, nerve damage, incisional problem, or postoperative dislocation)] were compared.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 months. Hip pain was significantly less with DAA-THA compared with PLA-THA at postoperative 1, 3, and 7 days (p < 0.05). There was no clinical difference between DAA-THA and PLA-THA in terms of the VAS, HOOS, or HSS at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). DAA-THA had a longer operative time and shorter length of incision compared with PLA-THA. There was no statistical difference between DAA-THA and PLA-THA in terms of intraoperative blood loss, cup abduction, cup anteversion, stem orientation, and perioperative complications (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that DAA-THA and PLA-THA could provide comparable HHS and HOOS at all follow-ups. Compared with PLA-THA, DAA-THA is associated with less hip pain within postoperative 7 days and shorter incision length, but longer operative time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR1800019816. Registered 30 November 2018-retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=30863.

Difference in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral position in cementless total hip arthroplasty via modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

Whether different body positions during surgery affect postoperative stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral positions in THA under the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach.

METHODS

We reviewed 242 consecutive, primary cementless THAs performed with ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene via the modified Watson-Jones approach in either supine or lateral positions between 2009 and 2015 (supine group: 113 cases; lateral group: 129 cases). No specific reasons to select supine or lateral positions for the surgery were given during the study period. Computed tomography was performed pre- and postoperatively to measure preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion, respectively. Stem alignment in coronal and sagittal planes was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean difference in stem anteversion and femoral anteversion was 8.6 ± 9.4 in the supine position and 13.0 ± 11.4 in the lateral position (p = 0.0013). Although no significant difference was seen between groups for stem alignment in the coronal plane, flexed implantation was more likely in the supine group (46/113, 40.7%) than in the lateral group (20/129, 15.5%). A significant correlation was found between femoral anteversion and stem anteversion in both the supine and lateral groups (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.52, p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although stem anteversion was more strongly correlated with femoral anteversion in the supine position than in the lateral position, neutral position in the sagittal plane was more likely to be found with the lateral position than with the supine position. Surgeons can achieve ideal stem positioning by considering these results in the modified Watson-Jones approach in both the supine and lateral positions.

Risk factors for a radiolucent line around the acetabular component with an interface bioactive bone cement technique after primary cemented total hip arthroplasty

Aims

The main aims were to identify risk factors predictive of a radiolucent line (RLL) around the acetabular component with an interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique in the first year after THA, and evaluate whether these risk factors influence the development of RLLs at five and ten years after THA.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of 980 primary cemented THAs in 876 patients using cemented acetabular components with the IBBC technique. The outcome variable was any RLLs that could be observed around the acetabular component at the first year after THA. Univariate analyses with univariate logistic regression and multivariate analyses with exact logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for any RLLs based on radiological classification of hip osteoarthritis.

Results

RLLs were detected in 27.2% of patients one year postoperatively. In multivariate regression analysis controlling for confounders, atrophic osteoarthritis (odds ratio (OR) 2.17 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 4.49); p = 0.038) and 26 mm (OR 3.23 (95% CI 1.85 to 5.66); p < 0.001) or 28 mm head diameter (OR 3.64 (95% CI 2.07 to 6.41); p < 0.001) had a significantly greater risk for any RLLs one year after surgery. Structural bone graft (OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.29) p < 0.001) and location of the hip centre within the true acetabular region (OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.24); p < 0.001) were significantly less prognostic. Improvement of the cement-bone interface including complete disappearance and poorly defined RLLs was identified in 15.1% of patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the acetabular component at ten years with revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening as the end point was 100.0% with a RLL and 99.1% without a RLL (95% CI 97.9 to 100). With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 99.2% with a RLL (95% CI 97.6 to 100) and 96.5% without a RLL (95% CI 93.4 to 99.7).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that acetabular bone quality, head diameter, structural bone graft, and hip centre position may influence the presence of the any RLL.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2021;2(5):278–292.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

BACKGROUND

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

METHODS

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

RESULTS

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Mid-term Follow-up of the Direct Anterior Approach in Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Reconstruction Cage With Impaction Grafting

BACKGROUND

Severe acetabular bone loss is often treated with reconstruction cages and impaction grafting using allograft bone. Accurate implant positioning is crucial for successful clinical and radiological outcomes. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is a standard approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) that is being used more frequently for revision THA. The aim of this study was to report midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revision arthroplasty using the DAA to address large acetabular defects by using a reconstruction cage and impaction grafting.

METHODS

Acetabular cup revisions were performed in 64 patients (64 hips) with severe acetabular bone loss. All patients received reconstruction cages with impaction grafting via the DAA. The stem was also revised in 22 patients. Complications, radiological, and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Six of the 64 patients were revised at a mean follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 11-84 months), two each for implant failure, infection, and recurrent dislocation. One hip showed the radiological failure of the implant, but the patient was asymptomatic and was not revised. The median Western Ontario McMasters Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC) for the cohort overall improved significantly (P < .01) by the latest follow-up compared with preoperative scores.

CONCLUSION

Good midterm outcomes can be obtained with the DAA for acetabular cup revisions done to address severe acetabular bone loss by using reconstruction cages and impaction grafting. The number of complications was within the expected range for this type of revision procedure at midterm follow-up, and dislocation rates were low.

Accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the disposable accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients who underwent THA through the anterolateral supine approach (ALS) with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system for the supine position (HipAlign^®) between July 2017 and October 2018 were analyzed in this study. We compared the intraoperative cup angles using navigation records with the postoperative angles using postoperative computed tomography (CT) data. All patients were categorized into the following groups according to the course of three discrete, sequential operative time periods: 1-25 (initial group), 26-50 (intermediate group), and 51-75 (recent group). We compared the accuracy of cup inclination and anteversion among the three groups. The time required for navigation and the operative time of all patients were measured.

RESULTS

The average absolute error in measurement (postoperative CT-navigation record) was 2.6° ± 2.7° (inclination) and 2.8° ± 2.7° (anteversion). There were no significant differences among the three groups. The average time required for navigation and the operative time were 365.1 ± 90.3 s and 76.1 ± 1.6 min, respectively. The required time for HipAlign^® navigation and operative time were constant in most patients, except for those of the initial five cases.

CONCLUSION

The accelerometer-based portable navigation system provides good accuracy of cup orientation, has a short learning curve, and requires a minimal surgical time for THA in supine position.

Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series

INTRODUCTION

Although the advantages of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) have been well documented, DAA in the supine position is limited by the difficulty in exposing the acetabulum and femur, which may result in implant malpositioning and intra-operative complications. Recent studies have reported that DAA-THA in the lateral position can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in implant alignment between two patient cohorts that underwent primary THA by DAA and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) in the lateral position.

METHODS

A total of 208 THAs (110 using DAA and 98 using PLA) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The cup anteversion angle was closer to the target anteversion angle, and the accuracy of cup orientation was superior in the DAA group. A total of 82 (74.5%) DAA-THA and 56 (57.1%) PLA-THA cases showed successful inclination and anteversion angles (p = 0.008) of the implant. In addition, 90 (81.8%) DAA-THA and 67 (68.4%) PLA-THA cases had successful anteversion angle (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of successful inclination angle (98 vs. 81, p = 0.181), as well as in the stem alignment in both coronal and sagittal planes.

CONCLUSION

THA using DAA in the lateral position can achieve superior cup orientation compared to PLA while maintaining the stem alignment.

Portable imageless navigation system and surgeon's estimate for accurate evaluation of acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty in supine position

BACKGROUND

This prospective study aimed to clarify whether this novel device can evaluate the cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA) more closely to that measured in postoperative computed tomography (CT) compared to the surgeon's estimate using a manual goniometer.

METHODS

We prospectively performed 30 cementless THAs via the anterolateral approach in supine position between October 2018 and July 2019, wherein cup orientation was evaluated by both a portable imageless navigation system (HipAlign) and a manual goniometer during surgeries. Primary outcome was the absolute estimate error [the absolute value of the difference between cup angles measured by postoperative CT and those measured by HipAlign (group H) or surgeon's estimate using the manual goniometer (group S) during surgery]. The number of outliers of the absolute estimate error (> 10°) in each group was also estimated.

RESULTS

The absolute estimate error of cup inclination in groups H and S was 3.3° ± 2.7° and 3.0° ± 2.5°, respectively (p = 0.51), whereas that of cup anteversion was 3.8° ± 3.4° and 6.0° ± 3.7°, respectively (p = 0.0008). The number of outliers of the estimate error in groups H and S was one case (3.3%) and six cases (20.0%), respectively (p = 0.04). In all six outlier cases, surgeons underestimated cup anteversion during surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

This portable imageless navigation system was a useful method, especially for avoiding incorrect cup anteversion. Underestimation of cup anteversion during THA in the supine position with the conventional alignment assisting device should be given attention.

Comparative study of stem anteversion using a cementless tapered wedge stem in dysplastic hips between the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the concept of combined anteversion is accepted as one of best indicators of prosthetic joint stability. Technical parameters may influence the stem and cup anteversion. We therefore investigated if stem anteversion could be influenced by surgical approaches in cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem with stem-first technique.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulated that the type of approach, posterolateral (PLA) or anterolateral approach (ALA), would influence stem anteversion in dysplastic hip patients. We asked (1) whether stem anteversion was higher in the PLA group and (2) how postoperative stem anteversion was correlated to preoperative femoral anteversion in each group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared two groups of hips that underwent THA using a tapered wedge stem with the posterolateral (PLA group; 154 hips) or anterolateral (ALA group; 81 hips) approaches. Computed tomography was utilized to measure femoral neck and stem anteversion. To investigate related factors that affect stem anteversion, a stepwise regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The stem anteversion in the PLA and ALA groups was 43.7°±9.8° and 34.0°±12.3°, respectively (p<0.01). The stepwise selection process resulted in a model involving femoral neck anteversion and surgical approach (p<0.01). The stem anteversion of the ALA group (r=0.75, p<0.01) was better correlated to femoral neck anteversion than that of the PLA group (r=0.52, p<0.01).

DISCUSSION

The stem implantation through the ALA is thought to be more restricted than that through the PLA due to the difference of difficulty in femoral exposure. Tapered wedge stems, which are relatively thin and flat, have a high degree of freedom in the femoral canal. Consequently, in cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem, the surgical approaches affected stem anteversion differently. Stem anteversion was more anatomically restored to femoral neck anteversion through the ALA than through the PLA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The orientation of the acetabular cup is a critical factor for prevention of various postoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although most patients are treated in either supine or lateral position during surgery, it is still unclear which position is superior to achieve more accurate cup positioning. Our study was conducted in order to answer the following questions: (1) does the supine position provide a higher accuracy of cup positioning than the lateral position in THA using modified Watson-Jones approach? (2) is there any difference in the distribution of cup position between the two positions? Hypothesis Our hypothesis was that the supine position would provide a higher accuracy of cup positioning than the lateral position in THA using modified Watson-Jones approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center prospective randomized study (registration number: UMIN000021627) was conducted between May 2016 and December 2017. We recruited a total of 60 participants undergoing unilateral primary cementless THA using modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach based on the result of the sample size calculation. They were randomly assigned to either supine position (n=29) or lateral position (n=31). The cup alignment was targeted using a goniometer during surgery. The radiographic cup inclination was targeted to 40° and the radiographic cup anteversion was targeted considering the femoral stem anteversion during surgery. Postoperative cup alignment was measured by plain radiography and computed tomography. We defined the difference between postoperative and target cup angle as target error and our primary outcome was the absolute value of the target angle. As secondary outcome, the distribution of the target error was evaluated. The target errors of each inclination and anteversion were divided into 3 groups; neutral (-3°≤the target error≤3°), positive error (3°<the target error), and negative error (the target error<-3°).

RESULTS

The assessment of primary outcome for all recruited patients showed that supine group was significantly more accurate than lateral group in terms of radiographic inclination (2.4° vs. 4.5°, respectively, mean difference 2.1°; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 3.5; p<0.01). There was no significant difference in terms of radiographic cup anteversion (5.6° vs. 5.2°, mean difference 0.4°; 95% confidence interval, -1.8 to 2.6; p=0.69). The rate of positive error of anteversion in supine and lateral group was larger than that of negative value of anteversion (51.7% vs. 10.3% and 48.4% vs. 12.9%, respectively). Any acute complication (dislocation, fracture, and infection) was not found in both groups during postoperative 3 months.

DISCUSSION

In this randomized-controlled trial, higher accuracy of acetabular cup inclination was provided by supine position than by lateral position in THA. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of cup anteversion. In both groups, most cups were placed with larger anteversion than we targeted. Modified Watson-Jones approach in both positions should be performed considering these results.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000021627. Level of evidence II, randomised controlled study (population-limited).

Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early research shows several advantages of the direct anterior approach (DAA) in THA that claimed to be as effective but less invasive than the posterior approach. However, due to the difficult femoral exposure and possible complications related to femoral preparation, this approach may result in a higher rate of undersized stems when compared to other approaches. The present authors believe that the femoral implant design (collar or collarless stem, short or long stem) in a collared femoral stem may relate to lower rates of stem subsidence and limb length discrepancy (LLD) in mid-term to long-term follow-up when compared to collarless femoral stems. However, currently, there is no consensus as to which femoral implant design is the most suitable for DAA in THA.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess and compare postoperative complications (neurapraxia, wound infection, LFCN, hematoma, artery injury, cup malposition, embolism, fracture and implant loosening) and revision rates due to dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and implant migration after DAA using collared compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem compared to long femoral stem in THA. These clinical outcomes consist of the postoperative complications and revision femoral stem due to neurapraxia, wound, LFCN and LLD. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Relevant studies that reported postoperative complications and revision of either implant were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to June 6, 2018. Thirty-four studies were included for the analysis of DAA in THA; 23 studies were retrospective cohorts, four studies were prospective cohorts, and seven studies were RCTs. Thirty-one studies and three studies were included for analysis of collarless and collared femoral stems. Twenty-six studies were long femoral stems and eight studies were short femoral stems. Overall, there were 6825 patients (6457 in the collarless group and 368 in the collared group, 4280 in long stem and 2545 in short stem). A total of 469 and 66 patients had complications and revisions in the collarless group, and no patient had complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The total complication and revision rate per patient were 5% (95%CI 3.3%, 7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6%, 1.2%) in all patients. The complication rate and revision rate were 5.7% (95%CI 3.8%, 7.7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6, 1.2) in the collarless group. There was no prevalence of complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The complication rate and revision rate were 10.2% (95%CI 9%, 11.4%), 0.7% (95%CI 0.3%, 1%) and 5.2% (95%CI 3.1, 7.2), 1.5% (95%CI 1%, 2%) in short and long femoral stems, respectively. Indirect meta-analysis shows that collared femoral stem provided a lower risk of complications of 0.02 (95%CI 0.001, 0.30) when compared to collarless femoral stem. Long femoral stems had a lower risk of having complications of 0.57 (95%CI 0.48, 0.68) when compared to short femoral stems. In terms of revision, there is no statistically significant difference in collared femoral stem compared to collarless femoral stem and long femoral stem compared to short femoral stem.

CONCLUSION

In DAA THA, collared femoral stem and long femoral stem had decreased complication rates when compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem by both direct and indirect meta-analysis methods. However, in terms of revision rates, there were no differences between all femoral stems (short versus long and collared versus collarless). Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings as the current literature is still insufficient.

The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) is an established approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The complication rates in hip revision arthroplasty are much higher in comparison with primary THA. A right positioning of the implants and a soft tissue, especially the abductors spearing approach, is important to get good functional results and low complication rates. The aim of this study was to show the clinical and radiological outcome of isolated revision hip arthroplasty of the cup by using the DAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aseptic cup revisions were carried out in 48 patients using the DAA. A decision to exchange the stem was made intraoperatively in seven cases. Complications, radiological and functional outcome were assessed. All of the data were collected retrospectively. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.

RESULTS

In most of the cases the standard DAA was used. A proximal extension was nescessary in 15 patients (31%). The mean cup inclination angle after revision was 44° (min. 25°, max. 62°). Six implants (12.5%) were located outside of the Lewinnek safe zone. The centers of rotation of the revision implants were a mean of 0.6 cm superior (min. 0, max. 2.2 cm) and 0.5 cm lateral (min. 0.2 cm, max 1.2 cm) in comparison with the center of rotation in the healthy hip on the contralateral side. Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 50 to 91 (P = 0.03). Complications noted consisted of two periprosthetic infections (4.2%), one aseptic cup loosening (2.1%), two hematomas requiring revision (4.2%), and one case each of femoral nerve injury, lower-leg venous thrombosis, and pneumonia. No dislocations were observed and there were no cases of heterotopic ossification based on the Brooker classification. No persistent damage of the nervus cutaneus femoris lateralis was found at the follow-up examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAA represents a feasible option in hip revision arthroplasty. Anatomic reconstruction of the cup is reproducibly possible. Good medium-term results can also be achieved. Particularly in relation to dislocation, the complication rates are low. Due to the learning curve, the DAA should only be used in hip revision arthroplasty by those with sufficient experience in primary THA. Adequate data regarding stem revisions through the DAA are not available at the moment.

The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and learning curves of anterior-based muscle-sparing total hip arthroplasty (ABMS-THA) in the supine position. Furthermore, early functional outcome was evaluated and compared to direct anterior approach (DAA) by measuring surface electromyography (sEMG).

METHODS

We present a prospective cohort study of 343 hips. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time and peri-operative adverse events. For assessment of efficacy, functional and radiological outcomes were evaluated. A selected group of 32 patients have been studied by sEMG and compared to a matched group of 32 patients who received a THA using DAA approach.

RESULTS

There was one dislocation (0.3%); two (0.6%) patients had an intra-operative fractures of the greater trochanter; two patients (0.6%) experienced a self-limited femoral nerve palsy. Physical therapy milestones for hospital discharge were reached on an average of 1.7 days. sEMG showed that ABMS and DAA have a similar muscle recruitment pattern and functional recovery after THA. One patient was revised for infection, 16 were lost, and 326 hips were available with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 24-60). The mean Harris Hip Score (HSS) increased from 44.3 to 91.9. Ninety-six percent of the hips had a leg length discrepancy (LLD) < 5 mm. There were no radiological signs of mechanical loosening or osteolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABMS approach in the supine position is clinically effective and safe; special advantages include a very low dislocation rate and a great control of LLD.

A Pilot Study of Augmented Reality Technology Applied to the Acetabular Cup Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We developed an acetabular cup placement device, the AR-HIP system, using augmented reality (AR). The AR-HIP system allows the surgeon to view an acetabular cup image superimposed in the surgical field through a smartphone. The smartphone also shows the placement angle of the acetabular cup. This preliminary study was performed to assess the accuracy of the AR-HIP system for acetabular cup placement during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We prospectively measured the placement angles using both a goniometer and AR-HIP system in 56 hips of 54 patients undergoing primary THA. We randomly determined the order of intraoperative measurement using the 2 devices. At 3 months after THA, the placement angle of the acetabular cup was measured on computed tomography images. The primary outcome was the absolute value of the difference between intraoperative and postoperative computed tomography measurements.

RESULTS

The measurement angle using AR-HIP was significantly more accurate in terms of radiographic anteversion than that using a goniometer (2.7° vs 6.8°, respectively; mean difference 4.1°; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.2; P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of radiographic inclination (2.1° vs 2.6°; mean difference 0.5°; 95% confidence interval, -1.1 to 0.1; P = .13).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, the AR-HIP system provided more accurate information regarding acetabular cup placement angle than the conventional method. Further studies are required to confirm the utility of the AR-HIP system as a navigation tool.

The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The minimally invasive (MI) anterolateral approach is a relatively new approach for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with a hemiarthroplasty (HA). There is limited research available presenting clinical outcomes after an HA using the MI approach. Therefore the aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of the MI and traditional anterolateral approaches in patients after HA.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database and completed by retrospective review of the electronic medical records. Patients undergoing HA in a level II trauma teaching hospital between 1 January 2011 and 1 May 2016 were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 463 patients (67% female), 223 in the MI group (mean age, 82 ± 7) and 240 (mean age, 81 ± 8) in the traditional anterolateral group were enrolled. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics. The surgeons experience measured by the operations performed per year was in favour of the MI anterolateral group (26 vs 18, p < 0.001). The median operating time for an MI approach was shorter (53 vs 69 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in mortality rates (p = 0.131) and post-operative complications: haematomas (p = 0.63), dislocations (p = 0.63), deep surgical site infections (p = 0.66) and re-operations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show the MI anterolateral approach has a minimally shorter operation time with no difference in post-operative complications and clinical outcomes. We, therefore, conclude that the MI anterolateral approach is a safe alternative for the traditional anterolateral approach with an improved operation time, a smaller incision and less surrounding tissue damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III retrospective cohort study.