Hip osteonecrosis: stem cells for life or behead and arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2018;42:1425-1428. [PMID: 29934715 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4026-4]

Comparison of current treatment strategy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of cell therapy

Aims: The purpose of our study is to compare the effects of core decompression (CD) and bone grafting (BG) on osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). And evaluate the efficacy of CD based on cell therapy to provide guidance for the dose and number of cells. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library between 2012 and 2022, with keywords including "osteonecrosis of the femoral head", "core decompression" and "bone grafting". We selected comparative studies of CD and BG, and the comparison of CD combined with bone marrow (BM) transplantation and CD alone. Changes in hip pain were assessed by VAS, hip function were assessed by HHS and WOMAC, and THA conversion rate was used as an evaluation tool for femoral head collapse. From these three aspects, the dose of bone marrow and the number of cells transplantation were subgroup analyzed. Results: Eleven studies were used to compare the efficacy of CD and BG. There was no significant difference in HHS, and the THA conversion rate of BG was significantly lower than that of CD. Thirteen CD studies based on cell therapy were included in the meta-analysis. Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) can significantly improve VAS (mean difference (MD), 10.15; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 7.35 to 12.96, p < 0.00001) and reduce THA conversion rate (odds ratio (OR), 2.38; 95% CI 1.26 to 4.47, p = 0.007). Medium dose bone marrow fluid has a lower p-value in THA conversion rate. The p values of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) of 10⁹ magnitude in VAS score were lower. Conclusion: In general, there is no consensus on the use of BG in the treatment of ONFH. The enhancement of cell-based CD procedure shows promising results. Using 20 mL BMAC and 10⁹ magnitude BMMC is likely to achieve better results.

Etiology of Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis in Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Avascular necrosis (AVN), known as osteonecrosis, aseptic necrosis, or ischemic bone necrosis, results in the destruction of bone cells. In the present study, we aimed to report the most common causes of AVN in in patients referred to Isfahan educational and medical centers.

Materials and Methods

This study is a cross-sectional study that was performed on all patients with AVN in medical educational centers in Isfahan during 2019 and 2020. We included all patients diagnosed with AVN. Patients' information including age, sex, cause of femoral head necrosis, medical history, and drug usage were collected. Finally, reliable data from 99 patients were recorded.

Results

We collected data of 99 patients in this study. The most prevalent cause of ANV was corticosteroids use (32.3%), and it was more prevalent among women (51.4%); the second prevalent cause of AVN in our study sample was trauma (28.28%), and it was more prevalent among men (32.8%).

Conclusion

The most common cause of AVN was corticosteroids, which was consistent with previous studies. Other main causes of AVN were traumatic or idiopathic issues.

PCA-Assisted Raman Analysis of Osteonecrotic Human Femoral Heads

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) occurs frequently in adolescents and young adults and causes progressive deformation and destruction of the hip joint and impairs standing and walking, resulting in a significant decrease in the quality of life of patients. In addition, studies have shown that a history of corticosteroid administration and heavy alcohol consumption are closely related to the occurrence of ONFH. However, the detailed mechanism by which steroid administration and alcohol consumption are associated with the development of the disease is still unknown. With many researches still ongoing and without a clear biological pathway for osteonecrosis, effective preventive measures cannot be taken. Therefore, the current focus of ONFH treatment is to establish an early diagnosis and treatment strategy. We obtained the femoral heads of four patients with steroidal ONFH and three patients with alcoholic ONFH. We then compared the femoral heads of steroidal and alcoholic osteonecrosis by analyzing them at the molecular level by Raman spectroscopy. Crystallographic changes (deformations) in the mineral phase and fraction of organic material respect to the total mass were then plotted as a function. We found that changes in bone composition in ONFH were different in steroidal and alcoholic ONFH. We conclude that this suggests that the developmental mechanisms of steroidal and alcoholic ONFH may follow different paths. We also noticed that while steroid seem to lead to a more marked degradation of the tissue, alcohol seem to affect also the quality of the healthy tissue.

Orthobiologics in the treatment of hip disorders

Orthobiologics are biological materials that are intended for the regeneration or healing of bone, cartilage and soft tissues. In this review we discuss the use of orthobiologics for hip disorders providing an update. The orthobiologics included in this article are hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma, bone marrow, adipose tissue and expanded mesenchymal stem cells. We explain the concepts and definitions of each orthobiological product, and the literature regarding its use in the hip joint. The paucity of guidelines for the production and characterization of the biological products leads to uneven results across the literature. Each biologic therapy has indications and benefits; however, noteworthy are the characterization of the orthobiologics, the application method and outcome analysis for further improvement of each technique.

Cell therapy for post-traumatic hip osteonecrosis in young patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of mesenchymal stem cells injections for treatment of post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

METHODS

A total of 46 patients were eligible and enrolled in the study. Twenty-three patients were treated with cell therapy and 23 patients with hip arthroplasty (control group). During a minimum follow-up duration of 10years, radiographs were used to evaluate the radiological results, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and visual analog scale were chosen to assess the clinical results.

RESULTS

For the cell therapy group, the product obtained by bone marrow aspiration in the iliac crest before concentration had a mean value of 2480 MSCs/mL (range 730 to 3800). The concentration product was containing average 9300 MSCs/mL (range 3930 to 19,800). At the most recent follow-up (average 15years after the first surgery, range 10 to 20years), among the 23 hips treated with cell therapy (concentrate bone marrow), 6 hips (26%) had collapsed and had required total hip arthroplasty (THA) without revision. Among the 23 hips treated with a primary THA, 7 (30.4%) had required one revision (second THA) at a mean follow-up of 6years (range 1 to 12years); two of these 7 hips had a re-revision; principal causes of revision were recurrent dislocations (3 cases) aseptic loosening (3 revisions) and infection (1 revision). As consequence, we observed significant (P<0.01) better survival time before revision for the cell therapy group. Better results with cell therapy were obtained for treatment at early stages before collapse.

CONCLUSION

The present study has demonstrated encouraging effects of cell therapy in early post-traumatic hip osteonecrosis and provides another choice for treatment in early stages I to II.

Total hip arthroplasty for sickle cell osteonecrosis: guidelines for perioperative management

The prognosis of sickle cell disease (SCD) has greatly improved in recent years, resulting in an increased number of patients reporting musculoskeletal complications such as osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be utilized to alleviate the pain associated with this disease.

Although it is well known that hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis (AVN) in SCD may represent a challenge for the surgeon, complications are frequent, and no guidelines exist to prevent these complications. Because patients with SCD will frequently undergo THA, we thought it necessary to fulfil the need for guidance recommendations based on experience, evidence and agreement from the literature.

For all these reasons this review proposes guidelines that provide clinicians with a document regarding management of patients with SCD in the period of time leading up to primary THA. The recommendations provide guidance that has been informed by the clinical expertise and experience of the authors and available literature.

Although this is not a systematic review since some papers may have been published in languages other than English, our study population consisted of 5,868 patients, including 2,126 patients with SCD operated on for THA by the senior author in the same hospital during 40 years and 3,742 patients reported in the literature.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:641-651. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190073

Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update

➢. Clinicians should exercise a high level of suspicion in at-risk patients (those who use corticosteroids, consume excessive alcohol, have sickle cell disease, etc.) in order to diagnose osteonecrosis of the femoral head in its earliest stage. ➢. Nonoperative treatment modalities have generally been ineffective at halting progression. Thus, nonoperative treatment is not appropriate in early stages when one is attempting to preserve the native joint, except potentially on rare occasions for small-sized, medially located lesions, which may heal without surgery. ➢. Joint-preserving procedures should be attempted in early-stage lesions to save the femoral head. ➢. Cell-based augmentation of joint-preserving procedures continues to show promising results, and thus should be considered as an ancillary treatment method that may improve clinical outcomes. ➢. The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in the setting of osteonecrosis are excellent, with results similar to those in patients who have an underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

Unusual indication of Cell therapy for hip osteonecrosis after pregnancy

PURPOSE

Osteonecrosis is a rare event during or after pregnancy. Due to the low number of cases, there is no report of long-term results after conservative surgery in this population.

METHOD

From 1992 to 2010, 145 consecutive female patients with unilateral symptomatic (94 stage I and 51 stage II) left hip osteonecrosis (ON) related to pregnancy were treated between 4 and 16 months after delivery with percutaneous mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection obtained from bone marrow concentration. The average total number of MSCs (counted as number of colonies forming units-fibroblast) injected in the hip was 185 000 ± 65 000 cells (range 95 000-240 000 cells).

RESULTS

At the most recent follow-up (average 15 years after hip surgery, range 8-25 years), among the 145 hips included in the study, 4 hips (2.7%) had collapsed and were treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirty-two of the 94 stage I had progressed to stage II; and 4 of the 51 stage II had progressed to stage III and collapse. The other 141 hips (97.3%) were without collapse and pain free. On MRI, as percentage of the volume of the femoral head, the osteonecrosis had decreased from 34.5% pre-operatively to 6% at the most recent follow-up. For women who had other children after treatment, a subsequent pregnancy was not associated with osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hip osteonecrosis following pregnancy had a low conversion rate to THA when treated early with cell therapy.

Scaffolds as Structural Tools for Bone-Targeted Drug Delivery

Although bone has a high potential to regenerate itself after damage and injury, the efficacious repair of large bone defects resulting from resection, trauma or non-union fractures still requires the implantation of bone grafts. Materials science, in conjunction with biotechnology, can satisfy these needs by developing artificial bones, synthetic substitutes and organ implants. In particular, recent advances in materials science have provided several innovations, underlying the increasing importance of biomaterials in this field. To address the increasing need for improved bone substitutes, tissue engineering seeks to create synthetic, three-dimensional scaffolds made from organic or inorganic materials, incorporating drugs and growth factors, to induce new bone tissue formation. This review emphasizes recent progress in materials science that allows reliable scaffolds to be synthesized for targeted drug delivery in bone regeneration, also with respect to past directions no longer considered promising. A general overview concerning modeling approaches suitable for the discussed systems is also provided.