Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up

No differences in long-term clinical outcomes and survival rate of navigation-assisted versus conventional primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A minimum 10-year follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates between navigation-assisted (NAV) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional (CON) TKA using a mobile-bearing insert.

METHODS

From May 2008 to December 2009, 45 and 63 mobile-bearing TKA patients were enroled in the CON- and NAV-TKA groups with 146.8 months follow-up, respectively. Clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Scores), radiographic outcomes (hip-knee-ankle [HKA], lateral distal femoral, medial proximal tibial, γ, and δ angles), and survivorship were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The number of HKA angle outliers (more than 3 degrees or less than -3 degree) was significantly lower in the NAV-TKA group (24.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.036) than in the CON-TKA group. However, long-term clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. The cumulative survival rate (best-case scenario) was 98.3% in the CON-TKA group and 97.5% in the NAV-TKA group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.883).

CONCLUSION

Long-term clinical outcomes and survival rates were similar between the two groups despite fewer outliers of postoperative lower-limb alignment in the NAV-TKA group. Excellent survival rates were observed in both groups using mobile-bearing inserts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Navigated, gap-balanced, adjusted mechanical alignment achieves alignment and balancing goals in a very high percentage but with partially non-anatomical resections

PURPOSE

Navigated, gap-balanced adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA) including a 0° varus tibial cut and modification of angles and resections of the femoral cuts to obtain optimal balance accepting minor axis deviations. Objectives of this study were (1) to analyse to what extent AMA achieves the goals for leg alignment and gap balance, and (2) in what percentage non-anatomical cuts are needed to achieve these goals.

METHODS

Out of 1000 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) all varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle < 178°; n = 680) were included. All surgeries were performed as computer assisted surgery (CAS) in AMA technique. CAS data at the end of surgery were analysed with respect to HKA and gap-sizes. All bone cuts were quantified. Depending on the amount of deformity, a subgroup analysis was performed. It was analysed whether the amount of deformity influences the non-anatomical cuts by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

AMA reached the goals for postoperative HKA (3° corridor) in 636 cases (93.5%). While extension and flexion gap balance were achieved in more than 653 cases (96%), flexion and extension gap size were equalled in 615 knees (90.4%). The resections of the lateral tibia plateau and distal and posterior medial femoral condyle were anatomical (Tibia: 7.0 ± 1.7 mm; medial condyle distal: 7.8 ± 1.4 mm; medial posterior: 8.2 ± 1.8 mm). The number of non-anatomical resections for those cuts were low; 67 (9.9%); 24 (3.5%); 32 (4.7%). For the medial tibia plateau and the lateral posterior condyle, the cuts were non-anatomical in a high percentage of cases; Tibia: 606 (89.1%), lateral posterior condyle: 398 (58.5%). Moderate but significant correlations were found between resection differences and amount of deformity (medio-lateral: tibia: 0.399; distal femur: 0.310; posterior femur: 0.167). No correlations were found between resection differences and gap values.

CONCLUSION

AMA reaches the intended target for HKA and gap balance in over 612 (90%) of cases and maintains the medial femoral condyle anatomically. Non-anatomical tibial resection causes increased external rotation of the femoral component and by that non-anatomical cut of the posterior lateral condyle. Nonanatomical resections of AMA might be one reason for the persisting high rate of unsatisfied patients after TKA. Anatomical and individual alignment philosophies might help to reduce this rate of dissatisfaction.

No Difference in Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for Robotic, Navigational, and Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years

Background

Computer-assisted surgery, including robotic and navigational total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been proposed as a technique used to improve alignment of implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes during a minimum follow-up period of 10 years among robotic, navigational, and conventional TKA.

Methods

A total of 855 knees (robotic group, 194; conventional group, 270; and navigational group, 391) were available for physical and radiological examinations over a mean follow-up period of 10 years. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method based on the survival endpoint. The Hospital for Special Surgery score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score, and range of motion were used for clinical evaluation. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis angle, the coronal inclination of femoral and tibial components, and the presence of radiolucent lines were also assessed at the final follow-up.

Results

All clinical assessments at the final follow-up revealed improvements in the three groups without any significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative 10-year survival rate was 97.4% in the robotic group, 96.6% in the conventional group, and 98.2% in the navigational group, with no significant difference (p = 0.447). The rates of complication-associated surgery were not significantly different among the groups (p = 0.907). Only the proportion of outliers in the HKA axis angle showed a significant difference (p = 0.001), but other radiological outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated satisfactory survival rates for robotic, navigational, and conventional TKAs and similar clinical outcomes during the long-term follow-up. Larger studies with continuous serial data are needed to confirm these findings.

The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Current Literature on Long-Term Survivorship of Computer-Navigated Versus Conventional TKA: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the most recent American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline making a "strong" recommendation against the use of intraoperative navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its use is increasing. We utilized the concept of the reverse fragility index (RFI) to assess the strength of neutrality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the long-term survivorship of computer-navigated and conventional TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed including all RCTs through August 3, 2021, comparing the long-term outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional TKA. Randomized trials with mean follow-up of >8 years and survivorship with revision as the end point were included. The RFI quantifies the strength of a study's neutrality by calculating the minimum number of events necessary to flip the result from nonsignificant to significant. The RFI at a threshold of p < 0.05 was calculated for each study reporting nonsignificant results. The reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) was calculated by dividing the RFI by the study sample size.

RESULTS

Ten clinical trials with 2,518 patients and 38 all-cause revisions were analyzed. All 10 studies reported nonsignificant results. The median RFI at the p < 0.05 threshold was 4, meaning that a median of 4 events would be needed to change the results from nonsignificant to significant. The median RFQ was 0.029, indicating that the nonsignificance of the results was contingent on only 2.9 events per 100 participants. The median loss to follow-up was 27 patients. In all studies, the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the RFI.

CONCLUSIONS

The equipoise in long-term survivorship between computer-navigated and conventional TKA rests on fragile studies, as their statistical nonsignificance could be reversed by changing the outcome status of only a handful of patients--a number that was always smaller than the number lost to follow-up. Routine reporting of the RFI in trials with nonsignificant findings may provide readers with a measure of confidence in the neutrality of the results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Can Technology Assistance be Cost Effective in TKA? A Simulation-Based Analysis of a Risk-prioritized, Practice-specific Framework

BACKGROUND

Robotic, navigated, and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) TKA procedures have been introduced to improve component placement precision and improve implant survivorship and other clinical outcomes. However, the best available evidence has shown that these technologies are ineffective in reducing revision rates in the general TKA patient population. Nonetheless, it seems plausible that these technologies could be an effective and cost-effective means of reducing revision risk in clinical populations that are at an elevated risk of revision because of patient-specific demographics (such as older age at index surgery, elevated BMI, and being a man). Since clinical trials on this topic would need to be very large, a simulation approach could provide insight on which clinical populations would be the most promising for analysis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We conducted a simulation-based analysis and asked: (1) Given key demographic parameters characterizing a patient population, together with estimates of the precision achievable with selected forms of technology assistance in TKA, can we estimate the expected distributions of anticipated reductions in lifetime revision risk for that population and the associated improvements in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that would be expected to result? (2) Are there realistic practice characteristics (such as combinations of local patient demographics and capital and per-procedure costs) for which applying a per-patient risk-prioritized policy for using technology-assisted TKA could be considered cost-effective based on projected cost savings from reductions in revision rates?

METHODS

We designed simulations of hypothetical practice-specific clinical scenarios, each characterized by patient volume, patient demographics, and technology-assisted surgical technique, using demographic information drawn from other studies to characterize two contrasting simulated clinical scenarios in which the distributions of factors describing patients undergoing TKA place one population at a comparatively elevated risk of revision (elevated-risk population) and the second at a comparatively reduced risk of revision (lower-risk population). We used results from previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses to estimate the implant precision in coronal plane alignment for patient-specific instrumentation, navigated, and robotic technology. We generated simulated TKA patient populations based on risk estimates from large clinical studies, structured reviews, and meta-analyses and calculated the patient-specific reduction in the revision risk and the change in QALYs attributable to the technology-assisted intervention in each of the two simulated clinical scenarios. We also incorporated a sensitivity analysis, incorporating variations in the effect size of deviations from overall coronal alignment on revision risk and difference in health state utilities acquired through a structured review process. We then simulated the outcomes of 25,000 operations per patient using the precisions associated with the conventional TKA technique, the three technology-assisted techniques, and a hypothetical technology-assisted intervention that could consistently deliver perfectly neutral overall coronal alignment, which is unachievable in practice. A risk-prioritized treatment policy was emulated by ordering the simulated patients from the highest to lowest predicted increase in QALYs, such that simulated patients who would see the greatest increase in the QALYs (and therefore the greatest reduction in lifetime revision risk) were the patients to receive technology-assisted TKA intervention in a practice. We used cost estimates acquired through a structured review process and calculated the net added costs of each of the three technology-assisted techniques as a function of the percent utilization (proportion of patients treated with technology assistance in a practice), factoring in fixed costs, per-procedure variable costs, and savings occurring from the prevention of future revision surgery. Finally, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and marginal cost-effectiveness ratio (MCER) for each technology-assisted technique for the two clinical scenarios. We then used a Monte Carlo approach to simulate variations in key patient risk, health state, and economic factors as well as to obtain a distribution of estimates for cost-effectiveness. We considered an intervention to be cost effective if either the ICER or MCER values were below USD/QALY 63,000.

RESULTS

For the lower-risk population, the median reduction in the revision risk was 0.9% (0.4% to 2.2%, extrema from the sensitivity analysis) and 1.8% (0.9% to 4.4%) for PSI and robotic TKA, respectively, and 1.9% (1.0% to 4.6%) for ideal TKA. In contrast, the median reduction in the revision risk in the elevated-risk clinical scenario was 2.0% (1.2% to 3.4%) and 4.6% (2.7% to 8.5%) for PSI and robotic TKA and 5.1% (3.0% to 9.4%) for ideal TKA. Estimated differences in the cumulative gain in QALYs attributable to technology-assisted TKA ranged from 0.6 (0.2 to 1.8) to 4.0 (1.8 to 10.0) QALYs per 100 patients, depending on the intervention type and clinical scenario. For PSI, we found treating 15% of patients in the lower-risk population and 77% in the elevated-risk population could meet the threshold for being considered cost effective. For navigated TKA systems offering high alignment precision, we found the intervention could meet this threshold for practice sizes of at least 300 patients per year and a percent utilization of 27% in the lower-risk population. In the elevated-risk population, cost-effectiveness could be achieved in practice volumes as small as 100 patients per year with a percent utilization of at least 6%, and cost savings could be achieved with a percent utilization of at least 45%. We found that robotic TKA could only meet the threshold for being considered cost-effectiveness in the lower-risk population if yearly patient volumes exceeded 600 and for a limited range of percent utilization (27% to 32%). However, in the elevated-risk patient population, robotic TKA with high alignment precision could potentially be cost effective for practice sizes as small as 100 patients per year and a percent utilization of at least 20% if a risk-prioritized treatment protocol were used.

CONCLUSION

Based on these simulations, a selective-use policy for technology-assisted TKA that prioritizes using technology assistance for those patients at a higher risk of revision based on patient-specific factors could potentially meet the cost-effectiveness threshold in selected circumstances (for example, primarily in elevated-risk populations and larger practice sizes). Whether it does meet that threshold would depend significantly on the surgical precision that can be achieved in practice for a given proposed technology as well as on the true local costs of using the proposed technology. We further recommend that any future randomized trials seeking to demonstrate possible effects of technology assistance on revision risk focus on clinical populations that are at higher risk of revision (such as, patient populations that are relatively younger, have higher BMIs, and higher proportions of men).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that technology assistance is only likely to prove cost effective in selected circumstances rather than in all clinical populations and practice settings. In general, we project that surgical navigation is most likely to prove cost effective in the widest range of circumstances, that PSI may be cost effective or cost neutral in a moderate range of circumstances, and that robotic surgery is only likely to be cost effective in moderately large practices containing patients who are on average at an intrinsically elevated risk of revision.

Comparison of Survival Rate and Outcomes Between Conventional and Navigation-Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Severe Varus Knees: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates between navigation-assisted (NAV) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional (CON) TKA in patients with preoperative severe varus deformity.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2011, 152 TKAs and 62 TKAs with preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles more than 15° were enrolled in the CON-TKA and NAV-TKA group with 135.7 months follow-up. Clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Scores), radiographic outcomes (HKA, α, β, γ, and δ angles), and survivorship were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean value of radiographic outcomes was not statistically different; however, outliers of the HKA angle were significantly higher in the CON-TKA group (18.4% versus 8.1%, P = .04). However, long-term clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% in the CON-TKA group and 96.8% in the NAV-TKA group, with no difference between the groups (P = .962).

CONCLUSION

NAV-TKA showed fewer outliers in the HKA angle for severe preoperative varus deformity compared with CON-TKA. The long-term clinical outcomes and survival rates were similar between the 2 techniques. A survival rate of more than 96% was observed in both groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Similar outcomes in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: ten-year results of a prospective randomized study

Background

Computer-assisted navigation (CAS) was developed to improve the surgical accuracy and precision. Many studies demonstrated better alignment in the coronal plane in CAS TKA compared to conventional technique. The influence on the functional outcome is still unclear. Only few studies report long-term results of CAS TKA. This study was initiated to investigate 10-year patient-reported outcome of CAS and conventional TKA.

Methods

From initially 80 patients of a randomized study of CAS and conventional TKA a total of 50 patients could be evaluated at the 10-year follow-up. The Knee Society Score and EuroQuol Questionnaire were assessed. For all patients a competing risk analysis for revision was performed.

Results

The patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated similar values for both groups. The 10-year risk for revision was 2.5% for conventional TKA and 7.5% for CAS TKA (p=0.237).

Conclusions

There was no difference between CAS and conventional TKA with regard to patient-reported outcome and revision risk ten years after surgery.

Trial registration

This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 11/30/2009, ID: NCT01022099.

Can Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Support the Prediction of Postoperative Three-Dimensional Kinematics of the Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joints at the Replaced Knee?

The aim of this study was to analyze the extent to which postoperative patellofemoral joint (PFJ) kinematics assessed at 6-month follow-up after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) mimics the intraoperative kinematics after final component implantation. The study hypothesis, already proved in terms of tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) kinematics, is that the intraoperative assessment of PFJ kinematics after component implantation is also capable of predicting postoperative knee kinematics during activities of daily living. Twenty patients selected for TKA with patellar resurfacing were implanted using surgical navigation, including patellar component positioning via a novel computer-assisted procedure. This allowed for intraoperative TFJ and PFJ kinematic assessment after final component implantation. At 6-month follow-up, all patients were contacted for follow-up control; in addition to clinical examination, this implied postoperative kinematics assessments by three-dimensional video fluoroscopy of the replaced knee during standard activities of daily living. Several traditional PFJ, as well as TFJ, rotations and translations were calculated intra- and postoperatively and then statistically compared. Good postoperative replication of the intraoperative measurements was observed for most of PFJ variables analyzed, as well as those for TFJ. Relevant statistical analysis also supported the significant consistency between the intra- and postoperative measurements. Pertaining to the present findings on a statistical basis, intraoperative measurements performed at both TFJ and PFJ kinematics using a surgical navigation system under passive conditions, are predictive of the overall knee kinematics experienced at postoperative follow-ups by the same replaced knees in typical activities of daily living.

Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review

BACKGROUND

Robotic (RTKA) and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty (CNTKA) are increasingly replacing manual techniques in orthopaedic surgery. This systematic review compared clinical outcomes associated with RTKA and CNTKA and investigated the utility of natural language processing (NLP) for the literature synthesis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was implemented. Results of included studies were combined and analysed. A transfer learning approach was applied to train deep NLP classifiers (BERT, RoBERTa and XLNet), with cross-validation, to partially automate the systematic review process.

RESULTS

52 studies were included, comprising 5,067 RTKA and 2,108 CNTKA. Complication rates were 0-22% and 0-16% and surgical time was 70-116 and 77-102 min for RTKA and CNTKA, respectively. Technical failures were more commonly associated with RTKA (8%) than CNTKA (2-4%). Patient satisfaction was equivalent (94%). RTKA was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving target alignment, less femoral notching, shorter operative time and shorter length of stay. NLP models demonstrated moderate performance (AUC = 0.65-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

RTKA and CNTKA appear to be associated with similarly positive clinical outcomes. Further work is required to determine whether the two techniques differ significantly with regard to specific outcome measures. NLP shows promise for facilitating the systematic review process.

New technology-based assistive techniques in total knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The radiological and clinical efficiency among robot-assisted surgery (RAS), computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial.

METHODS

Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review were performed to investigate radiological and clinical efficiency respectively. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE and CERQual tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-four RCTs (7289 patients and 7424 knees) were included. The NMA showed that RAS-TKA had the highest probability for mechanical axis restoration (odds ratio for RAS vs. CAS 3.79, CrI 1.14 to 20.54, very low certainty), followed by CAS-TKA (odds ratio for CAS vs. CON 2.55, CrI 1.67 to 4.01, very low certainty) and then CON-TKA, without significant differences in other radiological parameters. No differences were found in clinical outcomes after qualitative systematic review (overall low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Technology-based assistive techniques (CAS and RAS) may surpass the CON-TKA, when considering higher radiological accuracy and comparable clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the clinical effects of computer-assisted and traditional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty separately to determine whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty can provide better lower extremity radiographic results and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We searched literatures to identify relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of computer-assisted and traditional methods in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. After screening, quality evaluation and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality and bias risks of the included studies were evaluated. The meta-analysis compared the radiographic results, functional outcomes and complications of the two techniques.

Results

Six clinical controlled trials were included, with total of 1098 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the accuracy in terms of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal alignment of the tibial component in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty was significantly better than those in traditional total knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in the functional results, revision rates or aseptic loosening rates between the two techniques.

Conclusion

After excluding individual differences such as bone development and bone quality, although computer-assisted techniques can better accurately correct the mechanical axis of the lower extremity and the position of prosthesis implantation than traditional techniques, there is no significant difference in the functional results and revision rate of bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the same individual.

Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for tricompartmental knee arthritis. Computer navigation and robotic-assisted-surgery (RAS) have emerged as tools that aim to help plan and execute surgery with greater precision and consistency. We reviewed the most current literature to describe the historical background and outcomes compared to conventional TKA.

Methods

A review and synthesis of the literature comparing the patient reported outcomes (PROM’s) of RA TKA and computer-assisted (CA) TKA to conventional TKA was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

CAS TKA improves accuracy and consistency of implant position, and appears to provide a small improvement in PROMs and implant survival compared to conventional TKA. RTKA similarly improves implant accuracy compared to conventional techniques and early results suggest a similar small benefit in PROMs compared to conventional TKA. A strengthening trend is emerging showing CAS TKA has greatest benefit to implant survival in people under 65. RTKA survival analysis data is more limited and early results do not allow strong conclusions, however early trends are similar to CAS TKA.

Conclusion

Results for CAS-TKA show improvement in alignment, and early clinical outcomes have revealed promising results, with longer-term data and medium-term survival analysis recently emerging showing small benefits over conventional TKA. RTKA represents another phase of development. Early results show similar trends to that of CAS TKA with longer-term data still to come.

Complications of computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: retrospective cohort of eight hundred and seventy eight consecutive knees

PURPOSE

The main objective was to analyze the computer-assisted navigation (CAN)-specific complications that forced to switch to conventional procedure in primary total knee replacement (TKR). The secondary objective was to determine the influence of those complications on TKR short-term survival.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 878 primary TKR in 753 patients. Two consecutive versions of the OrthoPilot navigation system (Braun Aesculap, Germany) were used during the study time. Specific complications of CAN were defined as those due to the instrumentation (hardware or software failures), which were classified in one of two categories according to whether they occurred during the registration or tracking process.

RESULTS

There were 20 (2.3%) complications related to the navigation system use that forced to switch to conventional surgery: in 11 (1.2%) knees due to loosening of the tracking pins, and in the other nine (1.0%) there were information system failures. There was a trend for a higher conversion rate to conventional surgery with the use of the first version of the software. There were no fractures, infections, or nerve injuries at the pin site. We found no differences in the distribution of baseline variables among those with or without conversion to conventional surgery. There was no significant difference (p = 0.488) in the two year survival between patients with or without conversion.

CONCLUSION

CAN for primary TKR is a safe method with few specific complications that forced to switch from the navigated to the conventional procedure. Conversion to conventional surgery did not affect the short-term survival of TKR.

Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Surgery Compared with Conventional Instrumentation in 19,221 Total Knee Arthroplasties: Results After a Mean of 4.5 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improved alignment in association with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) as compared with conventional instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but have failed to show a consistent clinical benefit. The aim of the present study was to compare the revision rates and functional outcomes following TKA performed with either CAS or conventional instrumentation. Recognizing that selection bias may arise from the preferential use of CAS in difficult or complex cases, the implant survival data and postoperative functional scores were analyzed with reference to whether the surgeon routinely performed TKA with use of CAS or conventional instrumentation.

METHODS

Revision rates and functional data in terms of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) for 19,221 TKAs performed from 2006 to 2018.These data were analyzed by comparing 2 cohorts of patients: those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used CAS ("routine CAS" surgeons) and those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used conventional instrumentation ("routine conventional" surgeons). The mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 0 to 12 years).

RESULTS

The revision rate per 100 component-years was 0.437 for the "routine CAS" surgeons, compared with 0.440 for the "routine conventional" surgeons (p = 0.724). For patients <65 years of age, the revision rate per 100 component-years was equivalent for the "routine CAS" and "routine conventional" surgeons (0.585 compared with 0.508; p = 0.524). The OKS scores were similar at 6 months (38.88 compared with 38.52; p = 0.172), 5 years (42.26 compared with 41.77; p = 0.206), and 10 years (41.59 compared with 41.74; p = 0.893) when comparing the 2 cohorts. Surgeons who had performed >50 TKAs with use of CAS took 10 minutes longer on average than those who used conventional instrumentation (92 compared with 82 minutes; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated no difference in survivorship or functional outcome scores to support using CAS for TKA. Experienced surgeons using CAS had longer operative durations than comparable surgeons using conventional instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical outcomes of two-stage total knee arthroplasty using articulating cement spacer in patients with infected arthritic knee: A comparison with arthroscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and recurrence rate of infection between patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery and two-stage total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for infected arthritic knees.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 52 patients (52 knees) with advanced knee joint arthritis who underwent arthroscopic surgery or two-stage TKA using articulating cement spacer (ACS) for knee joint infection between January 2009 and November 2013. Of the 52 patients (52 knees), 38 and 14 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (AS group) and two-stage TKA using ACS (ACS-TKA group), respectively. Patient-reported outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scales (EQ-VAS)); range of motion; and recurrence rate of infection were evaluated.

RESULTS

Recurrence of infection was observed in 7/38 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery, all of whom received two-stage TKA using ACS. Regarding the functional outcomes of the ACS-TKA group obtained before conversion to TKA and those of the AS group obtained six months after arthroscopic surgery, the former group had better outcomes for KOOS pain, KOOS activities of daily living, KOOS quality of life, and EQ-VAS. Regarding the functional outcomes of the ACS-TKA group obtained during the last follow-up and after conversion to TKA and those of the AS group who underwent TKA after arthroscopic surgery, no significant between-group differences were observed. The infection recurrence rate was higher in the AS than in the ACS-TKA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering infection control and functional outcomes, two-stage TKA using ACS can be an effective alternative treatment for patients with infected arthritic knees.

Comparison of iASSIST Navigation System with Conventional Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

The iASSIST navigation system is a handheld accelerometer‐based navigation system that has been applied in clinical practice in recent five years. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of iASSIST navigation with conventional surgical techniques for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare the surgery time between an iASSIST group and a conventional treatment group. This systematic review and meta‐analysis included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science and the CNKI databases over the past 20 years. Inclusion criteria were studies that compared the iASSIST navigation system with conventional TKA. The primary outcomes were mechanical axis (MA) and outliers, which means postoperative MA varus or valgus of more than 3°. Secondary outcomes were coronal femoral angle (CFA) and coronal tibial angle (CTA). Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate functional outcome. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Eight studies involving 558 knees were included in this meta‐analysis. Of these, 275 patients used the iASSIST navigation system and 283 used conventional surgical techniques. A total of 5 studies were considered high quality and the other 3 were considered to be of moderate quality. The occurrence of malalignment of >3° in the iASSIST group was 13.3%, compared with 29.04% in the conventional group. Postoperative MA of the iASSIST group was significantly better than that of the conventional group (I² = 19%, OR = −0.92, 95% CI = −1.09 to −0.75, P < 0.00001). The iASSIST navigation system provided significantly increased accuracy in the coronal femoral angle (I² = 79%, OR = −0.88, 95% CI = −1.21 to −0.54, P < 0.00001) and the coronal tibial angle (I² = 34%, OR = 0.39, 95% CI = −0.48 to −0.30, P < 0.00001) compared with conventional techniques. However, the duration of surgery using the iASSIST procedure was longer and there was no significant difference in the short‐term KSS in the iASSIST group compared with the conventional group. We found that when pooling the data of included studies, the number of outliers was fewer in the iASSIST group, and compared with conventional TKA techniques, the iASSIST system significantly improved the accuracy of lower limb alignment but the duration of surgery was prolonged in addition to there being no apparent advantage in terms of short‐term functional score.

A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether long-term outcomes differ between computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the radiographic outcomes, the long-term functional outcomes, and survivorship between computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing long-term outcomes between computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Randomized controlled trials with mean follow-up durations of >8 years were included. The meta-analysis compared radiographic outcomes (postoperative alignment), functional outcomes (range of motion and patient-reported outcomes), and survivorship of the 2 techniques.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. A meta-analysis of accuracy revealed better outcomes in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty when compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty in terms of the sagittal alignment of the femoral component (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51 to 0.93]; p = 0.02) and the coronal alignment of the tibial component (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.95]; p = 0.02). The mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the coronal alignment of the femoral component, and the sagittal alignment of the tibial component did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 techniques. Both in terms of the revision rate and the incidence of aseptic loosening, there were no differences between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty resulted in better outcomes in postoperative component alignment than conventional total knee arthroplasty, there were no significant differences in long-term functional outcomes and survivorship between the 2 techniques. To fully evaluate the utility of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty, additional randomized controlled studies including diverse ethnic groups and countries, as well as studies evaluating the correlation between postoperative alignment and long-term survivorship, are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The patient results and satisfaction of knee arthroplasty in a validated grading system

INTRODUCTION

The validated Knee Osteoarthritis Grading System (KOGS) was implemented and clinical results were compared with patient satisfaction data and implant survivorship in a multi-centre study with surgeons familiar with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is also the first study to evaluate the prevalence of UKA and TKA in consecutive osteoarthritis (OA) knee arthroplasties assessed by this system..

METHOD

A consecutive cohort of knees was gathered at three different institutions as categorized by KOGS and surgically treated with the recommended implant unless clinical reasons or patient preference precluded such an option. One thousand one hundred seventy-seven consecutive knees were evaluated including 311 TKA (26%), 695 medial UKA (59%), 154 lateral UKA (13%) and 17 PFA (2%) and the results of the categories evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the complications reflected in the different categories.

RESULTS

The failure rate of the UKA (3.5%) or TKA (1.6%) is not higher than accepted results in the literature and the difference in complications is negligible between the UKA (72%) and TKA (26%) cohorts. Revision of a UKA to a TKA as an endpoint was 0.58% with ipsilateral progression at 0.8% over a period of five to 84 months (mean follow-up of 36 months) despite the 'excessive' proportion of UKA in this cohort. The Oxford Score improvement is significant in TKA and UKA and contributes to the acceptable outcomes (The OKS for TKA improved from 20 pre-operatively to 36 post-operatively and the UKA improved from 22 pre-operatively to 39 post-operatively).

CONCLUSION

KOGS achieves acceptable early survival and functional results when implemented and is a suitable tool for identifying the preferred implant as was validated.

Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Incorrect positioning of components during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) increases the risk of pain, instability, and early revision. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D planning-assisted and a conventional system for TKA positioning. We hypothesized that the use of three-dimensional CT-scan planning and custom cutting guides would increase the accuracy of component positioning.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, prospective study of two groups was performed. In one group, patient-specific custom cutting guides (PSCG) were used for component positioning based on 3D CT-scan planning. In the control group, TKA was performed with a conventional ancillary system. The components' positioning angles were measured on 3D reconstructions. The main evaluation criterion was the percentage of outliers outside of a target zone of ± 3° for the coronal positioning of the femoral component.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The percentage of outliers for the femoral component was significantly lower in the 3D-guided group (1 patient) compared to the control group (7 patients p = 0.02). The coronal femoral angle was restored with greater accuracy in the 3D-assisted group (- 0.1° ± 1.4°) compared to the control group (1.6° ± 2.5°). Surgery was significantly shorter in the 3D group. The clinical outcomes were better in the 3D group at the two year follow-up with fewer failures and a lower standard deviation in IKS scores.

CONCLUSION

The use of a 3D planning and custom guides can improve TKA component positioning by increasing the accuracy of implants alignment and reducing the percentage of outliers. The same benefit was not demonstrated for the global knee alignment and the clinical scores with no indisputable clinical advantage for the PSCG.

Total knee arthroplasty in Italy: reflections from the last fifteen years and projections for the next thirty

PURPOSE

Annual rates of knee arthroplasty are increasing in all developed countries, imposing a significant economic and organizational burden; it is crucial to forecast the future need for knee arthroplasty, to assist stakeholders in planning strategies and investments, especially in a country like Italy, with the largest proportion of elderly citizens in Europe. Few epidemiological studies have been performed worldwide to estimate the demand for future knee replacement, and a variety of methods have been proposed.

METHODS

We investigated the epidemiology of knee arthroplasty performed in Italy in the last 15 years and projected incidence rates up to the year 2050, utilizing, comparing, and adapting the available methodologies.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2016, 812,639 primary TKA were performed in Italy on patients over 40. The total number of surgeries increased by 262% with an average annual growth rate of 6.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adopting the best fitting projection method, an increase of 45% in incidence rate is expected for 2050.