Time-sensitive ambulatory orthopaedic soft-tissue surgery paradigms during the COVID-19 pandemic

A Comprehensive Review on Managing Fracture Calcaneum by Surgical and Non-surgical Modalities

This comprehensive review delves into the multifaceted landscape of calcaneal fractures, thoroughly examining their aetiology, clinical presentation, and diverse management strategies. Encompassing surgical and non-surgical approaches, the review scrutinises critical aspects such as patient compliance, rehabilitation protocols, and long-term follow-up considerations. Surgical modalities, propelled by recent innovations like minimally invasive techniques and advanced fixation materials, are juxtaposed with non-surgical interventions, emphasising the pivotal role of patient education and adherence to optimise outcomes. The synthesis of critical findings underscores the need for individualised care and multidisciplinary collaboration in clinical practice. Moreover, the review outlines recommendations for healthcare practitioners and identifies promising areas for future research, including biomechanical studies and telerehabilitation. This comprehensive exploration aims to contribute to the ongoing evolution of calcaneal fracture management, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes in this complex orthopaedic realm.

The Careful Return of Sports Medicine Procedures in the United States During COVID-19: Comparison of Utilization, Patient Demographics, and Complications

OBJECTIVES

Sports medicine procedures encompass some of the highest-volume elective surgeries performed annually. Elective surgery was suspended because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic; therefore, the purpose was to compare temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective sports medicine procedures in 2019 and 2020.

METHODS

Using a multicenter, nationwide sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for all patients undergoing common elective sports medicine procedures. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and 30-day complications were compared pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

A total of 48,803 patients underwent elective surgery in 2019 (n = 27,883) and 2020 (n = 20,920), a 25.0% decline. Procedural utilization declined by 42.5% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3-Q4. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020Q2 was greatest for meniscectomy (47.6%), rotator cuff repair (42.7%), labral repair (41.6%), biceps tenodesis (41.3%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (38.5%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (1.31%) versus 2020 (1.51%; P = 0.072). The 30-day readmission (0.74% versus 0.67%; P = 0.374), reoperation (0.35% versus 0.35%; P = 0.963), and mortality (0.01% versus 0.01%; P = 0.657) rates were similar between calendar years.

CONCLUSIONS

Sports medicine procedures declined during the second quarter of 2020. Despite pandemic restrictions, patients who did undergo surgery did not experience increased complications. The present study may be used by surgeons, hospitals, and subspecialty societies to support the careful utilization of elective surgery during COVID-19.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prognostic study.

Immuno-Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19: Implications for Timing of Surgery and Anticoagulation

Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, global governing bodies prioritized transmissibility-based precautions and hospital capacity as the foundation for delay of elective procedures. As elective surgical volumes increased, convalescent COVID-19 patients faced increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and clinicians had limited evidence for stratifying individual risk in this population. Clear evidence now demonstrates that those recovering from COVID-19 have increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. These data-in conjunction with the recent American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines-offer the evidence necessary to expand the early pandemic guidelines and guide the surgeon's preoperative risk assessment. Here, we argue elective surgeries should still be delayed on a personalized basis to maximize postoperative outcomes. We outline a framework for stratifying the individual COVID-19 patient's fitness for surgery based on the symptoms and severity of acute or convalescent COVID-19 illness, coagulopathy assessment, and acuity of the surgical procedure. Although the most common manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is COVID-19 pneumonitis, every system in the body is potentially afflicted by an endotheliitis. This endothelial derangement most often manifests as a hypercoagulable state on admission with associated occult and symptomatic venous and arterial thromboembolisms. The delicate balance between hyper and hypocoagulable states is defined by the local immune-thrombotic crosstalk that results commonly in a hemostatic derangement known as fibrinolytic shutdown. In tandem, the hemostatic derangements that occur during acute COVID-19 infection affect not only the timing of surgical procedures, but also the incidence of postoperative hemostatic complications related to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC). Traditional methods of thromboprophylaxis and treatment of thromboses after surgery require a tailored approach guided by an understanding of the pathophysiologic underpinnings of the COVID-19 patient. Likewise, a prolonged period of risk for developing hemostatic complications following hospitalization due to COVID-19 has resulted in guidelines from differing societies that recommend varying periods of delay following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In conclusion, we propose the perioperative, personalized assessment of COVID-19 patients' CAC using viscoelastic hemostatic assays and fluorescent microclot analysis.

Trends in upper extremity injuries presenting to emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Management of Outpatient Elective Surgery for Arthroplasty and Sports Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

Background:

The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented unforeseeable challenges to the orthopaedic community, especially arthroplasty and sports medicine subspecialities, as many surgeries were deemed nonessential and delayed. Although there is a glimpse of hope with the approval and distribution of vaccines, daily case numbers and death tolls continue to rise at the time of this review.

Purpose:

To summarize the available literature on the management of elective sports medicine and arthroplasty procedures in the outpatient setting to gather a consolidated source of information.

Study Design:

Scoping review; Level of evidence, 5.

Methods:

A scoping review of 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and OVID Medline) was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. All retrospective and prospective analyses, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, expert opinions, and societal guidelines were included for review, with 29 articles meeting the inclusion criteria.

Results:

Guidance for resumption of elective arthroplasty and sports medicine surgery and patient selection during the COVID-19 pandemic focuses on resource availability, patient fitness, and time sensitivity of the procedure, with patient and surgical team safety as the highest priority. Telemedicine and other innovative technology can be used to continue patient care during periods of delayed surgery through monitoring disease progression and offering nonoperative management options.

Conclusion:

While the current societal recommendations provide guidance on safety protocols and patient prioritization, each orthopaedic practice must consider its unique situation and use evidence-based medicine when determining surgical timing and patient selection.

The impact of confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on ambulatory procedures and associated delays in care for asymptomatic patients

Background

Since the reopening of ambulatory centers, minimal data has been reported regarding positive tests among patients undergoing ambulatory procedures, associated delays in care, and outcomes of patients previously positive for coronavirus disease 2019.

Methods

A retrospective observational case series of ambulatory procedures was performed. Records since the reopening of ambulatory centers in New York were searched for patients with positive coronavirus disease 2019 nasal swab results who underwent ambulatory procedures. Chart reviews were conducted to determine coronavirus disease history and hospitalizations, demographic information, procedure details, and 30-day admissions.

Results

A total of 3,762 patients underwent ambulatory procedures. Of those, 53 were previously diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 but recovered and tested negative at preprocedural testing. Of the 3,709 asymptomatic patients, 37 (1.00%) tested positive during preprocedural testing; 21 patients had their procedures delayed on average 28.6 days until testing negative, while 16 had their procedures performed before testing negative owing to the time sensitivity of the procedure. There were no major complications or 30-day admissions in any of these asymptomatic patients. Three patients tested positive for coronavirus disease after having an ambulatory procedure.

Conclusion

Positive tests in asymptomatic patients led to procedure delays of 28.6 days. No patients who underwent ambulatory procedures after a positive coronavirus disease 2019 test had any coronavirus disease-related complications, regardless of whether or not the procedure was delayed until testing negative. Three patients tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 after having an ambulatory procedure; however, at an average of 19.7 days after, these cases were likely community acquired making the rate of nosocomial infection negligible.

Arthroscopy and COVID-19: Impact of the pandemic on our surgical practices

The aim of this article is to study systematically current evidence on status of arthroscopic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to study (1) changes in global arthroscopic practices, (2) recommendations on reducing risk to patients and health care workers (HCW), (3) changes in follow-up protocols of these patients. Systematic search was carried out by two different reviewers using three different online databases for all studies published in the English language before April 2020. The total number of abstracts screened initially was 314. After screening of these abstracts, a total of 13 studies were included for the systematic review. Numbers of orthopaedic injuries have seen a sharp fall during this time. Most elective surgical facilities were also closed at this time. Most studies have recommended telemedicine as an essential medium of providing continued care to patients during COVID-19. Studies have recommended that a conservative approach should be preferred for most patients with ligament injuries, and alternative procedures that have less requirement for an operating room should be explored. Common recommendation in all studies is that procedures of more elective nature should be postponed to a safer time frame when the transmission of COVID-19 virus in the population has declined. When surgeries are resumed, there is a need for triage of arthroscopy procedures from more important or urgent to less important ones. Elective surgical procedures should preferably be started with patients with no co-morbidities and lesser risk of peri-operative complications. All patients undergoing surgery and health care personnels should have some screening for disease. Attempts should be made to have shortest hospital stay. Choice of anaesthetic procedure should emphasize on minimal aerosolization of the virus. Regional anaesthesia is the preferred choice as far as possible. Most guidelines have recommended that patient follow up should be made telephonically or on video-conferencing.