Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants and bleeding risk in breast cosmetic surgery

Incidence of Hematoma Following Breast Reduction in Patients Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor or Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor: A Retrospective Review

Background Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use is more common in the plastic surgery population compared to the general population. This study was designed to assess the theoretical effect of SSRIs and SNRIs on platelet function and the potential for increased bleeding risk. This study sought to establish the incidence of postoperative bleeding following routine bilateral breast reduction for patients on SSRIs or SNRIs. The outcomes of this study contribute to the discussion of whether these medications should be discontinued before elective surgery. Methodology A retrospective chart review of all patients who received bilateral breast reduction surgery over a 10-year period was performed. Patient charts were reviewed for postoperative hematoma formation as well as medications being used around the time of surgery. The rate of hematoma formation in patients actively taking SSRIs or SNRIs at the time of surgery was compared with the rest of the study population. Results A total of 1,022 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The overall incidence of postoperative hematoma was 7.7%. Of these, 1.9% of patients had clinically significant hematomas that required operative evacuation, and the remaining were treated conservatively. The only variable associated with a significantly higher risk of hematoma formation was advanced age (p = 0.005). Conclusions There was no significant difference in hematoma incidence after breast reduction in patients taking SNRIs or SSRIs compared with the general population. This contradicts some of the previously published literature and can hopefully guide clinicians in counseling their patients preoperatively.

Preoperative management of medications for psychiatric disorders

Perioperative medication management is a complex topic. Physicians working in the perioperative space are frequently called upon to make decisions regarding continuing or stopping certain medications. For patients with psychiatric disorders, the overwhelming recommendation is to continue therapy with heightened awareness of anesthesiologists regarding potential side effects or medication interactions.

Evidence of Hematoma Prevention After Facelift

Hematoma is a common complication after facelift procedures. Multiple factors have been shown to increase the risk of hematoma formation, such as male gender, anticoagulant medication use, perioperative hypertension, increased intrathoracic pressure, and operative technique. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of existing literature to provide surgeons with evidence-based recommendations on how to minimize hematoma risk during facelift surgery. A literature search for hematoma and facelift surgery was performed that identified 478 unique manuscripts. Abstracts were reviewed, excluding articles not describing facelift surgery, those written before 1970, studies with a sample size of fewer than 5 patients, non-English studies, and those that did not provide postoperative hematoma rates. Forty-five articles were included in this text, with their recommendations. Measures such as the prophylactic management of pain, nausea, and hypertension, the use of fibrin glue tissue sealants, the use of local anesthesia rather than general anesthesia, and strict blood pressure control of at least <140 mmHg were found to significantly reduce hematoma formation. Quilting sutures has shown benefit in some high-risk patients. Measures such as drains, compression dressings, perioperative use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and perioperative steroids had no significant effect on hematoma formation. In addition to appropriate patient selection and careful intraoperative hemostasis, many adjunct measures have been shown to reduce postoperative hematoma formation in facelift procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Perioperative Medication Management in Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures

BACKGROUND

Perioperative medication management is vital to maintain patient safety while under anesthesia, as well as to avoid postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons make daily decisions on whether to ask a patient to stop taking medication before their surgery. These important decisions can affect bleeding risk, wound healing, and interactions with anesthetics, which can range from minor to life-threatening. Current plastic surgery literature lacks a comprehensive review of perioperative medication management, with existing reports focusing on specific procedures and specific medication classes.

METHODS

A PubMed database search was conducted for articles through July 2021. The bibliographies of included studies were also examined for articles not acquired in the initial search queries. The authors included studies on medication usage and perioperative guidance in patients undergoing elective plastic surgery procedures. The authors excluded studies unrelated to plastic surgery and studies where the medications were used as an intervention. Abstracts, animal studies, studies involving the pediatric population, and book chapters were also excluded, as well as articles not published in English.

RESULTS

A total of 801 papers were identified by our search terms. After title and abstract screening, 35 papers were selected for full-text review. After full-text review, 20 papers were selected for inclusion, with an additional 6 papers from cited references added. Of the 26 papers, 6 papers discussed psychotropic drugs, 6 papers discussed medications affecting hemostasis, 4 papers discussed hormone-containing medications, 3 papers discussed antilipid medications, 2 papers discussed antihypertensive medications, 2 papers discussed herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed both psychotropic and herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed medications affecting wound healing, and 1 paper discussed rheumatologic medications. A summary of those recommendations was then compiled together.

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative medication management in elective plastic surgery procedures remains a complex and multidisciplinary process. It is important to manage these patients in a case-by-case manner and to consult a specialist when necessary. Careful medication reconciliation is essential to decrease the likelihood of adverse outcomes and interactions with perioperative anesthetics.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Associated Bleeding Risks: A Narrative and Clinical Review

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a major cause of disability worldwide and is associated with serious lasting impairment. A leading hypothesis of the pathophysiology of MDD is the monoamine deficiency hypothesis which suggests that depression is caused by depletion of serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine in the central nervous system. Serotonin is the most widely studied neurotransmitter in the pathophysiology of depression, with studies showing that reduced central serotonin synthesis leads to depressive symptoms in individuals at risk for depression. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) inhibit serotonin reuptake and subsequently increase the amount of serotonin available in synapses. Common side effects of SSRIs include increased suicidality of patients under the age of 25, sexual dysfunction, anxiety, dizziness, weight gain, gastrointestinal distress, and headache. Other side effects include prolonging the QT interval, coagulopathy, and the risk of serotonin syndrome, as well as SSRI discontinuation syndrome. Sites of increased bleeding related to SSRI use have been reported to occur in the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as intracranially. Based on the current literature, three studies have found that SSRIs are not associated with increased bleeding and/or increased perioperative risk, while others have demonstrated that SSRIs are associated with an increased risk in perioperative use. The inhibition of serotonin reuptake can affect platelet aggregation since platelets also express the serotonin transporter. SSRIs can result in decreased storage of serotonin in platelet dense granules. Increased serotonin can also increase gastric acid secretion, which increases the risk for ulceration. SSRIs in combination with NSAIDs also show a significantly increased risk of upper GI bleeding. Some studies show an increased bleeding risk from 30% to 70% when taking a combination of vitamin K antagonists and SSRIs in hospitalized patients. Related to the high prevalence of conditions that are treated with SSRIs, the bleeding risk associated with this class of medication merits further study.

Preoperative Management of Medications for Psychiatric Diseases: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement Consensus Statement

There is a lack of guidelines for preoperative management of psychiatric medications leading to variation in care and the potential for perioperative complications and surgical procedure cancellations on the day of surgery. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement identified preoperative psychiatric medication management as an area in which consensus could improve patient care. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide recommendations to clinicians regarding preoperative psychiatric medication management. Several categories of drugs were identified including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications. Literature searches and review of primary and secondary data sources were performed for each medication/medication class. We used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations for preoperative management of individual medications in each of these drug categories. While most medications should be continued perioperatively to avoid risk of relapse of the psychiatric condition, adjustments may need to be made on a case-by-case basis for certain drugs.

Patients with psychiatric disease: implications for anesthesiologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psychiatric illness is common in patients presenting for surgery. Overall health and surgical outcomes are adversely affected by the presence of psychiatric comorbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

As new treatment modalities become available, their perioperative implications need to be evaluated. These implications include drug-drug interactions, hemodynamic effects, bleeding risk, and factors affecting perioperative exacerbation of the underlying psychiatric illness.

SUMMARY

From our review of the recent literature we continue to support the continuation of psychoactive agents in the perioperative period, taking into consideration the effects these agents have on concomitant drug use in the perioperative period; and the risks of withholding them at a high-stress time.

50 Shades of Red: The Predictive Value of Closed Suction Drains for the Detection of Postoperative Bleeding in Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

While closed suction drains (CSDs) are still frequently employed in clinical practice, the supporting evidence is limited with some studies demonstrating a failure of routine CSD use in preventing hematoma or seroma. Nonetheless, CSD quantity and quality fluid assessment is still appreciated by clinicians to detect postoperative bleeding. This study investigates the value of routine CSD use, in breast surgery, to predict postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

A retrospective, intra-individual analysis, of CSD fluid volumes between the hematoma side and the unaffected contralateral breast, was undertaken in patients (n = 20) with unilateral postoperative bleeding following bilateral breast surgery (2003-2018). Statistical analysis was undertaken to establish a minimum cutoff fluid volume that might assist in the detection of postoperative bleeding. To determine the usefulness of quality assessment of CSD fluid output by visual inspection, surgeons (n = 56) prospectively matched six eligible hemoglobin concentrations corresponding to pre-filled CSDs.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis did not yield a clinically reliable cutoff fluid volume indicating postoperative bleeding. All six eligible hemoglobin concentrations were completely successfully matched to pre-filled CSDs by 30.4% (17/56) of surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study questions the significance of routine CSD use to assist in the decision-making process to return to the theater and address postoperative bleeding. Quantity as well as quality analysis of CSD fluid output failed the reliability and diagnostic validity tests. Hemoglobin measurements in drain fluid specimens via blood gas analysis might contribute to the detection of postoperative bleeding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hematomas in Aesthetic Surgery

Hematomas represent one of the most common postoperative complications in patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. Depending on the type of procedure performed, hematoma incidence and presentation can vary greatly. Understanding the risk factors for hematoma formation and the preoperative considerations to mitigate the risk is critical to provide optimal care to the aesthetic patient. Various perioperative prevention measures may also be employed to minimize hematoma incidence. The surgeon's ability to adequately diagnose and treat hematomas after aesthetic surgery is not only crucial to patient care but also minimizes the risk of further complications or long-term sequelae. Understanding hematoma development and management enhances patient safety and will lead to overall increased patient satisfaction after aesthetic surgery.

The Incidence of Psychiatric Medication Use and Its Effect on Intraoperative Bleeding in Facial Cosmetic Patients

PURPOSE

Psychiatric medications, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, have been associated with increased surgical bleeding. This study aims to compare intraoperative surgical bleeding between cosmetic surgery patients who are and are not taking psychiatric medications.

METHODS

The charts of 392 consecutive patients who underwent cosmetic facial surgery at the senior author's practice were reviewed. Independent variables included self-reported psychiatric history, psychiatric diagnoses, and psychiatric medications as documented in the preoperative history and physical examination. The primary endpoint was administration of desmopressin (DDAVP), our proxy for increased surgical bleeding. Significant predictors of these endpoints were determined via Chi-squared testing.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen patients had a psychiatric diagnosis (30%), and 129 patients were taking some class of psychiatric medication (33%). Seventy-two patients received DDAVP (18%). A psychiatric diagnosis did not predict DDAVP administration (14.3% for patients with a psychiatric diagnosis vs. 20.88% for those without, p = 0.14). The use of a psychiatric medication was not associated with DDAVP administration (14.7 vs. 21%, p = 0.14). Male gender significantly predicted DDAVP administration (27.8 vs. 16.9% for females, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The use of psychiatric medications does not predict increased intraoperative surgical bleeding. This is useful given the prevalence of psychiatric medication use among this patient population and obviates the need for discontinuation of these medications, which otherwise could be consequential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Operative Bleeding Risk: A Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the data on the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on bleeding during or after operative procedures and to offer guidelines for clinical management.

DATA SOURCES

Search of PubMed and MEDLINE for all articles in English from 1990-2016 with key words depression, antidepressants, bleeding, platelets, and operation.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they reported information on bleeding complications during operative or childbirth procedures in patients taking antidepressants.

DATA EXTRACTION

Because of the limited number and heterogeneity of studies with respect to the range of operative procedures and definition of bleeding complications, a qualitative approach was taken to summarize results rather than abstracting and aggregating data.

RESULTS

The weight of the evidence is that SSRI use increases the risk of bleeding complications during and immediately after surgery. However, given the limited data, we cannot estimate the risk for a given patient having a given procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians must consider the risk-to-benefit ratio of discontinuing an SSRI before an elective operative procedure. Discontinuing SSRI medications may result in discontinuation syndrome, symptom recrudescence, or relapse of depression, whereas continuing an SSRI during surgery exposes patients to significant bleeding risks. Antidepressant prescribers must be cognizant of and take responsibility for discussing this potential problem and considering different options. This issue must also be the responsibility of the doctor performing the procedure, but, frequently, it will be the prescribing physician who alerts the surgeon to the potential bleeding risk associated with SSRIs.

Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Abnormal Bleeding

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) increase the risk of abnormal bleeding by lowering platelet serotonin and hence the efficiency of platelet-driven hemostasis; by increasing gastric acidity and possibly gastric ulceration; and by other mechanisms. The upper gastrointestinal tract is the commonest site of SRI-related abnormal bleeding; bleeding at this location may be increased by concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and by treatment with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. Bleeding at this location may be reduced by concurrent administration of acid-suppressing drugs.

Bleeding risk under selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been reported to be potentially associated with an increased risk of bleeding. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted to quantify this risk. Case-control and cohort studies investigating bleeding risk under SSRI therapy were retrieved by searching the Medline, Pascal, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Case-control studies were included if they reported bleeding incidents with and without the use of SSRIs and cohort studies were included if they reported the rate of bleeds among SSRI users and non-users. The main outcome was severe bleeding, whatever the site. Only data concerning SSRI belonging to the ATC class N06AB were used. For both case-control and cohort studies, we recorded the adjusted effect estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates were computed for case-control and cohort studies using an inverse-variance model. Meta-analysis of the adjusted ORs of 42 observational studies showed a significant association between SSRI use and the risk of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.27-1.57), random effect model, p<0.0001]. The association was found for the 31 case-control studies (1,255,073 patients), with an increased risk of 41% of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.25-1.60)], as well as for the 11 cohort studies including 187,956 patients [OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.64)]. Subgroup analyses showed that the association remained constant whatever the characteristics of studies. This meta-analysis shows an increased risk of bleeding of at least 36% (from 12% to 64%) based on the high-level of observational studies with SSRIs use.

Serotonergic antidepressants and increased bleeding risk in patients undergoing breast biopsy

OBJECTIVES

Recent investigations have shown that serotonergic antidepressant (SAd) use may increase the risk of peri-operative bleeding events. Our objective was to evaluate the possibility of a similar association in patients undergoing radiologic breast biopsies.

METHODS

We used data from 3890 patients undergoing 6300 biopsy procedures between January 2011 and October 2014 in the Breast Clinic of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. In this case-control study, cases were patients reported to have abnormal bleeding during their biopsy by board-certified radiologists. A control group of nonbleeders was selected using matching according to age and type of biopsy. The correlation between abnormal bleeding and SAd use was assessed using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

RESULTS

There were 97 patients with abnormal bleeding and 137 matched controls; 10 bleeders (cases) were on SAds (7 citalopram, 3 paroxetine) while only 1 nonbleeder (control group) was on a SAd (low-dose sertraline, 25 mg/day). SAds were significantly associated with increased bleeding risk (10.3% versus 0.7%, Fisher's Exact p = 0.001). Moreover, after adjusting for confounding factors (age, type of biopsy, size of biopsy, needle caliber, pathology result and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, multivariate logistic regression confirmed that SAds were associated with elevated bleeding risk (16.2, 95% confidence interval 1.87-140.1, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating increased bleeding events in breast biopsy patients using SAds. Clinicians should be aware that SAds may be associated with peri-operative bleeding risk, even in relatively minor procedures such as breast biopsies.

Assessing the Risks Associated with Antidepressant Use in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Antidepressant use has increased dramatically over the past decade. Although there is no question about the benefits of these medications, uncertainty exists with regard to the implications of antidepressant treatment surrounding plastic surgery. This systematic review collates all of the available literature that evaluates the risks of patient antidepressant treatment, in relation to plastic surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was conducted. Articles were assessed by two independent reviewers using predefined data fields and selected using specific inclusion criteria. The two authors independently reviewed the literature and extracted data from included reviews, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included in the analysis and were categorized into five groups for comparison: risk of bleeding, risk of breast cancer, risk of breast cancer recurrence, breast enlargement, and miscellaneous (unique complications). Extracted information included study type, statistical analyses, conclusion, and limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

This review does not support the cessation of antidepressants in patients before plastic surgery, as the numbers needed to harm are low and the implications of withdrawal may prove to be detrimental to postoperative management. However, the use of antidepressants for mental disorders may also implicate key patient risk factors for surgical complications, and sufficient exploration into the patient's indications for the prescription is crucial. Evidence so far does not suggest that antidepressants increase the risk of breast cancer or recurrence in general, but caution should be exercised for those specifically on concurrent tamoxifen and paroxetine treatment.