Laparoscopic management of bile duct and bowel injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Postcholecystectomy Duodenal Injuries, Their Management, and Review of the Literature

Backgrounds

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for treating gallstones; however, it is not free of complications. Postcholecystectomy duodenal injuries are rare but challenging complications after cholecystectomy. The objective of this study was to analyze the management of postcholecystectomy duodenal injuries and to review the related literature.

Materials and methods

An observational and retrospective study was conducted. We included all patients with postcholecystectomy duodenal injuries treated at a reference center, from January 2019 to December 2023. In addition, a review of the literature was carried out.

Results

Fifteen patients were found, mostly women; with gallbladder wall thickening on ultrasound (mean of 8 mm). The majority were emergency (n = 12, 80%) and LCs (n = 8, 53.33%). Cholecystectomies were reported to be associated with excessive difficulty (n = 10, 66.66%). The most injured duodenal portion was the first portion (n = 9, 60%), and blunt dissection was the most common mechanism of injury (n = 7, 46.66%). Most of these injuries were detected in the operating room (n = 9, 60%), and treated with primary closure (n = 11, 73.33%). Three patients with delayed injuries died (20%). According to the literature reviewed, 93 duodenal injuries were found, mostly detected intraoperatively, in the second portion, and treated with primary closure. A minority of patients were treated with more complex procedures, for a mortality rate of 15.38%.

Conclusion

Postcholecystectomy duodenal injuries are rare. Most of these injuries are detected and repaired intraoperatively. However, a high percentage of patients have high morbidity and mortality.

How to cite this article

Diaz-Martinez J, Pérez-Correa N. Postcholecystectomy Duodenal Injuries, Their Management, and Review of the Literature. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):44-50.

Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy via Cystic Plate Approach for Gallstone Patients with Chronic Cholecystitis

Introduction: Chronic cholecystitis has evolved into one of the digestive system diseases that negatively affect the quality of life of patients. This study was conducted to explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy via cystic plate approach for the treatment of gallstones with chronic cholecystitis. Materials and Methods: Totally 184 gallstone patients with chronic cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The First People's Hospital of Wuhu from January 2021 to October 2022 were randomly divided into a control group (n = 92) and an observation group (n = 92). In the observation group and control group, the gallbladder was removed using the cystic plate approach and traditional approach, respectively. Surgical indicators and complications of patients were compared. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The quality of life of patients was assessed using the SF-36 scale. Results: The recovery time of gastrointestinal function, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05). At 24 hours after surgery, the serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in the observation group were much lower than those in the control group (P < .05). Three months after surgery, the observation group showed a much higher quality of life score than the control group (P < .05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via cystic plate approach can effectively treat chronic gallstones with chronic cholecystitis. It shortened the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, reduced postoperative inflammation, and improved the quality of life.

Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Children

INTRODUCTION

 Traditionally, exploratory laparotomy was used to treat penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). At present, minimally invasive surgery (for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes) has developed and represents a rapidly evolving modality for dealing with PAT in stable children. In this article, we aim to present our experience, evaluate the effectiveness, and report the results of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for PAT in stable pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This prospective study involved 117 hemodynamically stable pediatric cases of PAT (caused by gunshots, stab, and accidental stab), admitted, and managed according to the severity of injury. The information recorded for analysis included demographic data, the anatomical location of injury, the initial vital data and scoring systems, the organs affected, the procedures done, operative time, need for conversion to laparoscopic-assisted approach, length of hospital stay, complications, missed injury, and mortality rate.

RESULTS

 Among 117 pediatric patients with PAT, 15 cases were treated conservatively and 102 cases were managed by MIS. They were 70 males and 47 females with a mean age of 7.3 ± 0.6 years (range = 1-14 years). They included 48 cases of gunshot injury, 33 cases of abdominal stab, and 36 cases of accidental stab. Laparoscopy was diagnostic (DL) in 33.3% (n = 34) and therapeutic (TL) in 66.7% (n = 68) of cases. Of the 68 TL cases, we completely managed 59 cases (86.8%) by laparoscopy, while 9 cases (13.2%) were converted to limited laparotomy. The mean operative time was 17 ± 1 minutes (range = 12-25 minutes) for DL, 85 ± 9 minutes (range = 41-143 minutes) for complete TL cases, and 89 ± 3 minutes (range = 47-149 minutes) for laparoscopic-assisted procedures. For DL cases, the mean length of hospital stay was 2 ± 0.4 days, while for complete TL cases, it was 5.4 ± 0.83 days, and for laparoscopic-assisted cases, it was 5.8 ± 0.37 days. Postoperative complications occurred in eight cases (7.84%), with five cases (4.9%) required reintervention. No missed injury or mortality was recorded in the study. The patients were followed up for a median period of 52 months.

CONCLUSION

 For management of PAT in children, MIS has 100% accuracy in defining the injured organs with zero percent missed injuries.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Repair for Iatrogenic Duodenal Injury in Children with Choledochal Cysts

Background/Purpose: During laparoscopic excision of choledochal cysts (CDCs), if duodenum injury is encountered, conversion to open repair of duodenal injury is often the standard approach. This study evaluates if it is safe to repair the duodenal injury laparoscopically in CDC children. Materials and Methods: CDC children who underwent single-incision laparoscopic repair for iatrogenic duodenal injury between October 2013 and September 2018 were reviewed. According to the pathophysiology, duodenal injuries were categorized into two subtypes: Type 1: injury caused by severe adhesions between perforation site at distal CDC and the duodenum; Type 2: anatomical variation, that is, distal CDC shared the common wall with the duodenum. A transabdominal wall suture was placed through distal end of CDC. Relying on the adhesion between distal CDC and duodenum, the injured duodenum can be clearly exposed when the assistant pulled on the retraction suture. The duodenal injury was repaired by a two-layer 5-0 polydioxanone running suture. The distal CDC was transected after repair was accomplished. Results: Five children were reviewed (Type 1: n = 4, Type 2: n = 1). Median age at surgery was 1.2 years. Median operative time was 4.0 hours. Median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Median duration of full diet resumption and drainage were 5 days, respectively. Median follow-up period was 31 months. Liver function tests and serum amylase levels were normalized within 1 year. None of patients had intestinal leak, anastomotic stenosis, bile leak, cholangitis, pancreatic leak, pancreatitis, or adhesive intestinal obstruction. Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic repair for iatrogenic duodenal injury in CDC children is safe and effective.

Duodenal injury post laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, mechanism, management and outcome

AIM: To study the etiopathogenesis, management and outcome of duodenal injury post laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS: A Medline search was carried out for all articles in English, on duodenal injury post LC, using the search word duodenal injury and LC. The cross references in these articles were further searched, for potential articles on duodenal injury, which when found was studied. Inclusion criteria included, case reports, case series, and reviews. Articles even with lack of details with some of the parameters studied, were also analyzed. The study period included all the cases published till January 2015. The data extracted were demographic details, the nature and day of presentation, potential cause for duodenal injury, site of duodenal injury, investigations, management and outcome. The model (fixed or random effect) for meta analyses was selected, based on Q and I² statistics. STATA software was used to draw the forest plot and to compute the overall estimate and the 95%CI for the time of detection of injury and its outcome on mortality. The association between time of detection of injury and mortality was estimated using χ² test with Yate’s correction. Based on Kaplan Meier survival curve concept, the cumulative survival probabilities at various days of injury was estimated.

RESULTS: Literature review detected 74 cases of duodenal injury, post LC. The mean age of the patients was 58 years (23-80 years) with 46% of them being males. The cause of injury was due to cautery (46%), dissection (39%) and due to retraction (14%). The injury was noted on table in 46% of the cases. The common site of injury was to the 2^nd part of the duodenum with 46% above the papilla and 15% below papilla and in 31% to the 1^st part of duodenum. Duodenorapphy (primary closure) was the predominant surgical intervention in 63% with 21% of these being carried out laparoscopically. Other procedures included, percutaneous drainage, tube duodenostomy, gastric resection, Whipple resection and pyloric exclusion. The day of detection among those who survived was a mean of 1.6 d (including those detected on table), compared to 4.25 d in those who died. Based on the random effect model, the overall mean duration of detection of injury was 1.6 (1.0-2.2) d (95%CI). Based on the fixed effect model, the overall mortality rate from these studies was 10% (0%-25%). On application of the Kaplan Meier survival probabilities, the cumulative probability of survival was 94%, if the injury was detected on day 1 and 80% if detected on day 2. In those that were detected later, the survival probabilities dropped steeply.

CONCLUSION: Duodenal injuries are caused by thermal burns or by dissection during LC and require prompt treatment. Delay in repair could negatively influence the outcome.

An option of conservative management of a duodenal injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Duodenal injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is rare complications with catastrophic sequelae. Most injuries are attributed to thermal burns with electrocautery following adhesiolysis and have a delayed presentation requiring surgical intervention. We present a case of a 47-year-old gentleman operated on for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a bilious drain postoperatively; for which an ERC was done showing choledocholithiasis with cystic duct stump blow-out and a drain in the duodenum suggestive of an iatrogenic duodenal injury. He was managed conservatively like a duodenal fistula and recovered without undergoing any intervention.

Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is the Appropriate Management for Acute Gangrenous Cholecystitis

Treatment of severe acute cholecystitis by laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial because of technical difficulties and high rates of complications. We determined whether early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is appropriate for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. The medical records of 116 patients with acute gangrenous cholecystitis admitted to the Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2005 and December 2009 were reviewed. The early operation group, those patients who had cholecystectomies within 4 days of the diagnosis, was compared with the delayed operation group, who had cholecystectomies 4 days after the diagnosis. Of the 116 patients, 57 were in the early operation group and 59 were in the delayed operation group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with respect to gender, age, body mass index, operative methods, major complications, duration of symptoms, mean operative time (98 vs 107 minutes), or postoperative hospital stay. However, the total hospital stay was significantly longer in the delayed operation group. More patients underwent preoperative percutaneous cholecystostomy in the delayed operation group (3.5 vs 15.3%). Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gangrenous cholecystitis is safe and feasible. There is no advantage to postponing an urgent operation in patients with acute gangrenous cholecystitis.

Laparoscopic repair of traumatic bowel injury in children

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the laparoscopic repair of isolated intestinal injuries in children who sustain focal abdominal trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients 16 years and younger who required surgery for traumatic bowel injuries during a 5-year period at 2 university children's hospitals. The study population was composed of hemodynamically stable patients who sustained focal energy transfer to the abdomen and were diagnosed preoperatively with intestinal injury. Children sustaining multisystem injuries and gunshot wounds or who were hemodynamically unstable were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty hemodynamically stable children were explored for preoperatively documented intestinal injury sustained after focal abdominal trauma. Laparoscopy was used to repair intracorporeally gastrointestinal injuries in 8 children. Mean operating time, time to diet, and time to discharge after laparoscopic bowel repair compared favorably with patients managed by laparotomy. An additional 6 patients had a laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection or repair after exteriorization only of the ruptured intestine through a short extension of the nearest port site. No early (missed injury, wound infection, bleeding) or late (obstruction) complications resulted after laparoscopic repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic primary or assisted repair of injured bowel is an appropriate surgical option in hemodynamically stable children who sustain focal abdominal trauma and may be associated with a more prompt return of intestinal function and shorter hospital stay.

Iatrogenic intestinal injury concomitant to iatrogenic bile duct injury: the second component

OBJECTIVE

Bile duct injuries have a frequency of 0.1% to 0.3% even in the most experienced centers. Complex biliary lesions usually require a bilioenteric anastomosis, achieving good long-term results in 80% to 90% of the cases. Besides injuries to the abdominal contents during laparoscopy (by trocars or electrocautery), intestinal complications associated with reconstruction attempts can be observed. We analyzed the concomitant intestinal complications in 251 patients with iatrogenic biliary injuries reconstructed over this 12-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with biliary tract reconstruction after iatrogenic injury in a tertiary academic health-care center was done. All patients with concomitant intestinal injury were included; type of operation and postoperative outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 251 patients, 35 cases had a concomitant intestinal injury. The most common site of fistulization was the duodenum (18 cases, 50%); 9 cases were associated with long-term subhepatic drains (more than three weeks), and the other 9 cases were associated with a dehiscent hepatoduodenostomy. Faulty Roux-en-Y reconstruction was observed in 5 cases. In 5 cases, fistulization of the jejunum and ileum, secondary to drain placement, was documented, as well as 3 cases with colonic injuries. Two patients had a dehisced Roux-en-Y anastomosis. One had a bilioenteric omega type ileal anastomosis, and 1 had a hepatoileal anastomosis without omega reconstruction. Primary repair of the duodenum with resection of the affected intestinal or colonic segment was done at the same time of biliary repair without related morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant gastrointestinal injures were found with an incidence of 15% in our series. The most common site of fistulization is the duodenum. In half of the patients, it was secondary to a dehiscent hepatoduodenostomy, whereas in the other, it was caused by long-term subhepatic drains. Besides faulty Roux-en-Y reconstruction, fistulization was related with long-term drains. Primary repair and resection of the affected segment of jejunum, ileum, and colon can be done during the same operative stage of biliary reconstruction, without significant correlated mortality.

Changing patterns of traumatic bile duct injuries: a review of forty years experience

AIM: To summarize the experiences of treating bile duct injuries in 40 years of clinical practice.

MATHODS: Based on the experience of more than 40 years of clinical work, 122 cases including a series of 61 bile duct injuries of the Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, and 42 cases (1989-1997) and 19 cases (1998-2001) of the General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, were reviewed with special reference to the pattern of injury. A series of cases of the liver and the biliary tract injuries following interventional therapy for hepatic tumors, most often hemangioma of the liver, were collected. Chinese medical literature from 1995 to 1999 dealing with 2742 traumatic bile duct strictures were reviewed.

RESULTS: There was a changing pattern of the bile duct injury. Although most of the cases of bile duct injuries resulted from open cholecystectomy. Other types of trauma such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and hepatic surgery were increased in recent years. Moreover, serious hepato-biliary injuries following HAE using sclerotic agents such as sodium morrhuate and absolute ethanol for the treatment of hepatic hemangiomas were encountered in recent years. Experiences in how to avoid bile duct injury and to treat traumatic biliary strictures were presented.

CONCLUSION: Traumatic bile duct stricture is one of the serious complications of hepato-biliary surgery, its prevalence seemed to be increased in recent years. The pattern of bile duct injury was also changed and has become more complicated. Interventional therapy with sclerosing agents may cause serious hepatobiliary complications and should be avoided.