1
|
Ajayi T, Luu H, Saberi B, Hamilton JP, Konduk BT, Özşeker B, Al Khalloufi K, Pustavoitau A, Philosophe B, Cameron AM, Gürakar A. Role of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and low-dose hepatitis B immune globülin in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence among cadaveric liver transplant recipients. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2018; 29:61-66. [PMID: 29391309 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positivity of the donor or the recipient may pose a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation following liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively investigated patient survival and reactivation among recipients who were given low-dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) plus antiviral agent (AV) versus AV only. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of cadaveric LT recipients, between 2013 and 2016, with positive Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBcAb and recipients who had received LT from HBcAb-positive donors were reviewed. Patient characteristics and clinical data were extracted. Donor variables were retrieved from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. HBIG (1560 IU/mL) Intravenous (IV) was intraoperatively administered with three daily doses. Entecavir 1 mg daily was also given. STATA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS There were 53 recipients; 39 (73.6%) were male with a median age of 59 y. HCV was the major indication in 30 (55.6%) patients. There were 28 recipients (52.8%) who received HBIG plus AV and 25 (47.2%) received AV only. The Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score between the groups were similar. Survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 100% (n=53), 93.2% (n=44), and 100.0% (n=26), respectively. There was no reactivation; two recipients in the AV group and one in the HBIG plus AV group died within 12 months. CONCLUSION This study supports the use of low-dose HBIG and AV for post-LT prophylaxis to be as effective as conventionally used high-dose HBIG (9600 IU) plus AV. Future prospective larger studies are warranted to examine the potential benefits of using AV alone without HBIG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tokunbo Ajayi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harry Luu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Behnam Saberi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - James P Hamilton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bugra Tolga Konduk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Burak Özşeker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kawtar Al Khalloufi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aliaksei Pustavoitau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benjamin Philosophe
- Transplant Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew M Cameron
- Transplant Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ahmet Gürakar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akcam AT, Ulku A, Rencuzogullari A, Eray IC, Okoh A, Kuran S, Dalcı K, Yalav O, Parsak CK, Sakman G, Demiryurek H. Antiviral Combination Therapy With Low-Dose Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin for the Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2016; 47:1445-9. [PMID: 26093739 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study presents the overall long-term hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate with possible associated factors after hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was given in combination with 4 different antiviral (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir) drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 2000 and October 2013, the medical records of 42 adult patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Cukurova University Medical Hospital for chronic liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) secondary to chronic HBV were reviewed retrospectively. The analyses of risk factors for recurrence were performed based on the efficacy of hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), HBV DNA, preoperative prophylaxis, and the presence of HCC. Posttransplantation HBV recurrence was defined as persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity after orthotopic liver transplantation, or the reappearance of HBsAg and HBV DNA after initial HBsAg undetectability despite prophylaxis. RESULTS The mean follow-up of 28 patients having HBIG and lamivudine prophylaxis was 73.25 ± 37.5 months with a recurrence rate of 3.5%. The mean follow-up of 2 patients having HBIG and adefovir prophylaxis was 90 ± 46.6 months with a 50% recurrence rate. The mean follow-up of each 6 patients who received prophylaxis with entecavir and tenofovir groups were 27.5 ± 16.1 and 16.17 ± 5.3 respectively, with no posttransplantation recurrence for both groups. On univariate analysis, preoperative factors such as anti-HBc, HBV DNA, preoperative prophylaxis, and the presence of HCC did not show any correlation with recurrence. However, HBeAg showed statistical significance for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose HBIG in combination with antiviral agents (lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir) is efficacious in preventing recurrence of HBV in posttransplantation patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Akcam
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey.
| | - A Ulku
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Rencuzogullari
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - I C Eray
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Okoh
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - S Kuran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - K Dalcı
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - O Yalav
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - C K Parsak
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - G Sakman
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - H Demiryurek
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiménez-Pérez M, González-Grande R, Mostazo Torres J, González Arjona C, Rando-Muñoz FJ. Management of hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12083-12090. [PMID: 26576093 PMCID: PMC4641126 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is responsible for up to 30% of cases of liver cirrhosis and up to 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver failure caused by HBV. The success of transplantation, though, depends on receiving prophylactic treatment against post-transplant viral reactivation. In the absence of prophylaxis, liver transplantation due to chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with high rates of viral recurrence and poor survival. The introduction of treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) during the 1990s and later the incorporation of oral antiviral drugs have improved the prognosis of these patients. Thus, LT for CHB is now a universally accepted option, with an estimated 5 years survival of around 85% vs the 45% survival seen prior to the introduction of HBIG. The combination of lamivudine plus HBIG has for many years been the most widely used prophylactic regimen. However, with the appearance of new more potent oral antiviral agents associated with less resistance (e.g., entecavir and tenofovir) for the treatment of CHB, new prophylactic strategies are being designed, either in combination with HBIG or alone as a monotherapy. These advances have allowed for more personalized prophylaxis based on the individual risk profile of a given patient. In addition, the small pool of donors has required the use of anti-HBc-positive donors (with the resulting possibility of transmitting HBV from these organs), which has been made possible by suitable prophylactic regimens.
Collapse
|
4
|
A new scheme with infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with entecavir for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence among liver transplant recipients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:901-6. [PMID: 26011237 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Liver transplantation significantly increases recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) among high-risk patients. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antiviral nucleotide analogues are effective prophylaxis reagents in preventing HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs with these treatments. METHODS To explore a more cost-effective prophylaxis protocol in patients after liver transplantation, we treated patients with an initial high dose of 10 000 IU HBIG during the anhepatic phase and a second high dose of HBIG at an optimal time point during surgery. The patients were treated with the traditional European protocol as a control, in which one dose of 10 000 IU HBIG was infused during the anhepatic phase and multiple doses of 10 000 IU HBIG were administered daily for 1 week after liver transplantation. RESULTS There were two mortalities among 50 patients treated with the new protocol and nine mortalities among 52 patients treated with the European protocol within 3 years after liver transplantation. The new prophylaxis method markedly improved the 3-year survival without HBV recurrence in 50 treated patients. However, there were five recurrences in 52 patients treated with the European protocol. High-risk factors such as HBV DNA+, positive hepatitis B e antigen, and hepatocellular carcinoma were all detected among five patients with HBV recurrence. The suppressed HBV recurrence was associated with significantly lower serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in the new protocol-treated patients tested at 1 month and 1 week after liver surgery compared with those treated with the European protocol. CONCLUSION Infusion of two high doses of HBIG during surgery in combination with entecavir significantly prevented HBV recurrence and improved the 3-year survival after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Harmancı Ö, Selçuk H, Haberal M. Prophylaxis against Recurrence in Liver Transplantation Patients with Hepatitis B Virus: What is New? J Clin Transl Hepatol 2014; 2:259-65. [PMID: 26356785 PMCID: PMC4521236 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2014.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes an endemic infection that affects nearly 2 billion patients worldwide. It is one of the leading causes of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation (LT). Recurrence of HBV infection after LT is due to specific HBV-host genome interactions. Although hepatitis B immunoglobulin treatment constituted the backbone of HBV recurrence, use of the nucleoside and nucleotide analogs (especially the ones with a higher genetic barrier to resistance), either alone or in combination, offer us new and powerful options in overcoming this serious issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özgür Harmancı
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Correspondence to: Özgür Harmancı, Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Mareşal Fevzi çakmak Cad. No:45 Bahçelievler, 06490, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: +90-312-212-6868, Fax: +90-312-215-0835. E-mail:
| | - Haldun Selçuk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Haberal
- Department of General Surgery, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee JY, Kim YH, Yi NJ, Kim HS, Lee HS, Lee BK, Kim H, Choi YR, Hong G, Lee KW, Suh KS. Impact of immunosuppressant therapy on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Clin Mol Hepatol 2014; 20:192-203. [PMID: 25032186 PMCID: PMC4099335 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.2.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Revised: 06/07/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The most commonly used immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation (LT) is a combination of tacrolimus and steroid. Basiliximab induction has recently been introduced; however, the most appropriate immunosuppression for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after LT is still debated. METHODS Ninety-three LT recipients with HCC who took tacrolimus and steroids as major immunosuppressants were included. Induction with basiliximab was implemented in 43 patients (46.2%). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to reduce the tacrolimus dosage (n=28, 30.1%). The 1-year tacrolimus exposure level was 7.2 ± 1.3 ng/mL (mean ± SD). RESULTS The 1- and 3-year recurrence rates of HCC were 12.9% and 19.4%, respectively. Tacrolimus exposure, cumulative steroid dosages, and MMF dosages had no impact on HCC recurrence. Induction therapy with basiliximab, high alpha fetoprotein (AFP; >400 ng/mL) and protein induced by vitamin K absence/antagonist-II (PIVKA-II; >100 mAU/mL) levels, and microvascular invasion were significant risk factors for 1-year recurrence (P<0.05). High AFP and PIVKA-II levels, and positive (18)fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography findings were significantly associated with 3-year recurrence (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with basiliximab, a strong immunosuppressant, may have a negative impact with respect to early HCC recurrence (i.e., within 1 year) in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Yeun Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Yul Hee Kim
- Ewha Graduate School of Clinical Health Sciences, Ewha Women's University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyang Sook Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Suk Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Koo Lee
- Ewha Graduate School of Clinical Health Sciences, Ewha Women's University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Rok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Women's University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|