1
|
Achanga BA, Bisimwa CW, Femi‐Lawal VO, Akwo NS, Toh TF. Surgical Practice in Resource-Limited Settings: Perspectives of Medical Students and Early Career Doctors: A Narrative Review. Health Sci Rep 2025; 8:e70352. [PMID: 39810920 PMCID: PMC11729344 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/01/2025] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Surgical practices in low-resource countries often fail to meet established standards. Both doctors and medical students have limited exposure to surgical cases, which hinders training and the development of surgical specialization. This study highlights the current state of surgical practice from a trainee's perspective, explores existing gaps in training and capacity building, and recommends practical solutions. Methods We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and other scientific databases using search terms such as "surgical practice," "doctors' perspectives in surgical practice," "surgery in low- and middle-income countries," and "solutions to surgical inadequacy." We included studies published from 2015 to 2024, with exceptions for a few highly relevant studies published prior to 2015. Results We outline the limitations identified in the literature concerning surgical training and healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. Many centers lack adequate infrastructure, human resources, and training. These challenges negatively affect the skills and quality of surgical care. However, some centers demonstrate that surgical practice is feasible through collaboration with institutions established in higher-income contexts. Conclusion Telesurgery, task shifting and sharing, high-impact, low-cost surgeries, and collaborations with more developed health systems could effectively bridge the gap in surgical availability in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nnoko Sona Akwo
- Department of Occupational and Environmental HealthUniversity of BueaBueaCameroon
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agoubi L, Carvalho M, Fewer S, Oke R, Fabo B, Daya L, Obiezu F, Adeola J, Nteungue BAK, Ekane Y, Etoundi AM, Juillard C. Integrating political prioritisation into national surgical planning: a scoping review of surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia care in Cameroon. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e014730. [PMID: 39675835 PMCID: PMC11647299 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical diseases contribute substantially to death and disability in Cameroon. Strategic planning for surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia (SOA) care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires consideration of the policy environment in addition to the issue severity. We aimed at the current landscape of SOA care in Cameroon, incorporating a framework for political prioritisation. METHODS A scoping review of published and grey literature was performed. Literature specific to Cameroon, published between 2010 and 2020 and written in either English or French, was included. Abstracts and full texts were screened for discussion of SOA policy context, care and delivery conditions, and issue characteristics. Data extraction and analysis were performed using the Shiffman and Smith framework for political prioritisation accounting for actors, ideas, political context and issue characteristics. RESULTS 121 articles were included. By specialty, 83 articles were specific to surgery, 45 to obstetrics and 6 to anaesthesia. Policy environment was discussed by 20% (n=25) articles; 30% (n=37) discussed actor power; 22% (n=27) discussed ideas in SOA care and 93% discussed issue characteristics. Core challenges to political prioritisation of SOA care in Cameroon are limited actor support, a lack of consensus definitions, gaps in capacity and a need for systematic data collection on surgical diseases. Policy opportunities include leveraging existing multilateral partnerships to unify SOA actors, conducting national assessments of SOA care capacity, formalisation of task shifting to build capacity, defining essential SOA procedures, including surgical care in future health coverage, and defining and including SOA benchmarks in strategic planning. CONCLUSIONS Integrating a framework for political prioritisation into a situational analysis of SOA care is critical to understanding an LMIC's policy context and actors, in addition to issue severity. Such an approach can serve as a baseline for analysis in evidence-informed policy-making for SOA care, even in the absence of centralised, country-wide data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Agoubi
- Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Melissa Carvalho
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity (PASE), Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sara Fewer
- Department of Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rasheedat Oke
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity (PASE), Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Brice Fabo
- Yaoundé Emergency Center, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | | | - Fiona Obiezu
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity (PASE), Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Janet Adeola
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity (PASE), Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | - Alain Mballa Etoundi
- Department for the Control of Disease, Epidemics and Pandemics, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Catherine Juillard
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity (PASE), Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacobson CE, Harbaugh CM, Agbedinu K, Kwakye G. Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Review of Resource-Limited Settings in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Rural America. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3302. [PMID: 39409921 PMCID: PMC11475417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings where patient-centered outcomes following surgery are often suboptimal. Although more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), segments of the United States have similarly limited healthcare resources, resulting in stark inequities even within close geographic proximity. Methods: This review compares and contrasts colorectal cancer outcomes in LMICs with those in resource-constrained communities in rural America, utilizing an established implementation science framework to identify key determinants of practice for delivering high-quality colorectal cancer care. Results: Barriers and innovative, community-based strategies aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes for colorectal cancer patients in low resource settings are identified. We explore innovative approaches and community-based strategies aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes, highlighting the newly developed colorectal surgery fellowship in Sub-Saharan Africa as a model of innovation in this field. Conclusions: By exploring these diverse contexts, this paper proposes actionable solutions and strategies to enhance surgical care of colorectal cancer and patient outcomes, ultimately aiming to inform global health practices, inspire collaboration between LMIC and rural communities, and improve care delivery across various resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare E. Jacobson
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Calista M. Harbaugh
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kwabena Agbedinu
- Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi 23321, Ghana
| | - Gifty Kwakye
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Global Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takoutsing BD, Endalle G, Senyuy WP, Celestin BM, Kwasseu GK, Tanyi PB, Jumbam DT, Kanmounye US. Identifying opportunities for global surgery in Cameroon: an analysis of existing health policies and events. Pan Afr Med J 2024; 47:143. [PMID: 38933430 PMCID: PMC11204985 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.143.38399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction the burden of diseases amenable to surgery, obstetrics, trauma, and anesthesia (SOTA) care is increasing globally but low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery proposed National Surgical, Obstetrics, and Anesthesia Plans as national policies to reduce the global SOTA burden. These plans are dependent on comprehensive stakeholder engagement and health policy analysis. Objective: in this study, we analyzed existing national health policies and events in Cameroon to identify opportunities for SOTA policies. Methods we searched the Cameroonian Ministry of Health´s health policy database to identify past and current policies. Next, the policies were retrieved and screened for mentions of SOTA-related interventions using relevant keywords in French and English, and analyzed using the 'eight-fold path´ framework for public policy analysis. Results we identified 136 policies and events and excluded 16 duplicates. The health policies and events included were implemented between 1967 and 2021. Fifty-nine policies and events (49.2%) mentioned SOTA care: governance (n=25), infrastructure (n=21), service delivery (n=11), workforce (n=11), information management (n=10), and funding (n=8). Most policies and events focused on maternal and neonatal health, followed by anesthesia, ophthalmologic surgery, and trauma. National, multinational civil society organizations and private stakeholders supported these policies and events, and the Cameroonian Ministry of Public Health was the largest funder. Conclusion most Cameroonian SOTA-related policies and events focus on maternal and neonatal care, and health financing is the health system component with the least policies and events. Future SOTA policies should build on existing strengths while improving neglected areas, thus attaining shared global and national goals by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Geneviève Endalle
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Wah Praise Senyuy
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Bilong Mbangtang Celestin
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | | | | | - Desmond Tanko Jumbam
- Department of Policy and Advocacy, Operation Smile Ghana, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | - Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye
- Research Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Department of Policy and Advocacy, Operation Smile Ghana, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Otoki K, Parker AS, Many HR, Parker RK. Gender Disparities in Complications, Costs, and Mortality After Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery in Kenya. J Surg Res 2024; 295:846-852. [PMID: 37543494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little is known about the impact of gender on emergency surgery within Kenya. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association of gender on outcomes of postoperative complications, health care costs, and mortality. METHODS We evaluated an established cohort of patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery in rural Kenya between January 1st, 2016 and June 30th, 2019. Utilizing logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported patient gender and the outcomes of postoperative complications and mortality. A generalized linear model was created for total hospital costs, inflation-adjusted in international dollars purchasing power parity, to examine the impact of gender. Confounding factors were controlled by Africa Surgical Outcomes Study Surgical Risk Score. RESULTS Among 484 patients reviewed, 149 (30.8%) were women. 165 (34.1%) patients developed complications, with women experiencing more than men (40.9% versus 31.0%; P = 0.03) and longer hospital stays (median 6 days (4-9) versus 5 (4-7); P = 0.02). After controlling for Africa Surgical Outcomes Study Surgical Risk Score, odds of developing complications for women were 1.67 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.55; P = 0.019) times higher than men, and the odds of death were 2.38 (95% confidence interval: 1.12-5.09; P = 0.025) times greater for women than men, despite similar failure-to-rescue rates and intensive care unit utilization. Total hospital costs were increased for women by 531 international dollars purchasing power parity (117-946; P = 0.012) when compared to men, attributed to longer lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that a discrepancy exists between men and women undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery in our setting. Further exploration of the underlying causes of this inequity is necessary for quality improvement for women in rural Kenya.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kemunto Otoki
- Department of Surgery, Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya. https://twitter.com/kemuntootoki
| | - Andrea S Parker
- Department of Surgery, Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya. https://twitter.com/AP_the_surgeon
| | - Heath R Many
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Negussie H, Getachew M, Deneke A, Tadesse A, Abdella A, Prince M, Leather A, Hanlon C, Willott C, Mayston R. "Problems you can live with" versus emergencies: how community members in rural Ethiopia contend with conditions requiring surgery. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:214. [PMID: 38365723 PMCID: PMC10874059 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10620-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 98% of people with surgical conditions living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not receive safe, timely and affordable surgical and anesthesia care. Research exploring barriers to receiving care has tended to be narrow in focus, often facility-based and ignoring the community beliefs, experiences and behaviours that will be an essential component of closing the gap in surgical care. Using qualitative methods, we captured diverse community perspectives in rural Ethiopia: exploring beliefs, perceptions, knowledge and experiences related to surgical conditions, with the overall aim of (re)constructing explanatory models. METHODS Our study was nested within a community-based survey of surgical conditions conducted in the Butajira Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, southern Ethiopia, and a follow-up study of people accessing surgical care in two local hospitals. We carried out 24 semi-structured interviews. Participants were community members who needed but did/did not access surgical care, community-based healthcare workers and traditional bone-setters. Interviews were conducted in Amharic, audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. We initially carried out thematic analysis and we recognized that emerging themes were aligned with Kleinman's explanatory models framework and decided to use this to guide the final stages of analysis. RESULTS We found that community members primarily understood surgical conditions according to severity. We identified two categories: conditions you could live with and those which required urgent care, with the latter indicating a clear and direct path to surgical care whilst the former was associated with a longer, more complex and experimental pattern of help-seeking. Fear of surgery and poverty disrupted help-seeking, whilst community narratives based on individual experiences fed into the body of knowledge people used to inform decisions about care. CONCLUSIONS We found explanatory models to be flexible, responsive to new evidence about what might work best in the context of limited community resources. Our findings have important implications for future research and policy, suggesting that community-level barriers have the potential to be responsive to carefully designed interventions which take account of local knowledge and beliefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Negussie
- Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT- Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Medhanit Getachew
- Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT- Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Andualem Deneke
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Amezene Tadesse
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ahmed Abdella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Martin Prince
- King's Global Health Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Leather
- King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT- Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Willott
- King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rosie Mayston
- Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Holler JT, Cortez A, Challa S, Eliezer E, Hoanga B, Morshed S, Shearer DW. Risk Factors for Delayed Hospital Admission and Surgical Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures in Tanzania. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:716-722. [PMID: 35442248 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open fractures, especially of the tibia, require prompt intervention to achieve optimal patient outcomes. While open tibial shaft fractures are common injuries in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is a dearth of literature examining delays to surgery for these injuries in low-resource settings. This study investigated risk factors for delayed management of open tibial fractures in Tanzania. METHODS We conducted an ad hoc analysis of adult patients enrolled in a prospective observational study at a tertiary referral center in Tanzania from 2015 to 2017. Multivariable models were utilized to analyze risk factors for delayed hospital presentation of ≥2 hours, median time from injury to the treatment hospital, and delayed surgical treatment of ≥12 hours after admission among patients with diaphyseal open tibial fractures. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Only 12% of patients used an ambulance, 41% were delayed ≥2 hours in presentation to the first hospital, 75% received an interfacility referral, and 10% experienced a delay to surgery of ≥12 hours after admission. After adjusting for injury severity, having insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.96) and wounds with approximated skin edges (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.66) were associated with a decreased risk of delayed hospital presentation. Interfacility referrals (2.3 hours greater than no referral; p = 0.015) and rural injury location (10.9 hours greater than urban location; p < 0.001) were associated with greater median times to treatment hospital admission. Older age (aOR = 0.54 per 10 years; 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.95), single-person households (aOR = 0.12 compared with ≥8 people; 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.96), and an education level greater than pre-primary (aOR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.62) were associated with fewer delays to surgery of ≥12 hours after admission. CONCLUSIONS Prehospital network and socioeconomic characteristics are associated with delays to open tibial fracture care in Tanzania. Reducing interfacility referrals and implementing surgical cost-reduction strategies may help to reduce delays to open fracture care in LMICs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan T Holler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abigail Cortez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sravya Challa
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edmund Eliezer
- Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Billy Hoanga
- Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Saam Morshed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David W Shearer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Equity in global surgical care: A commentary. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2021.100329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
9
|
Chichom-Mefire A, Mbome Njie V, Verla V, Atashili J. A Retrospective One-Year Estimation of the Volume and Nature of Surgical and Anaesthetic Services Delivered to the Populations of the Fako Division of the South-West Region of Cameroon: An Urgent Call for Action. World J Surg 2017; 41:660-671. [PMID: 27778076 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3775-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery-related conditions account for the majority of admissions in primary referral hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa. The role of surgery in the reduction of global disease burden is well recognized, but there is a great qualitative and quantitative disparity in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services between countries. This study aims at estimating the nature and volume of surgery delivered in an entire administrative division of Cameroon. METHODS In this retrospective survey conducted during the year 2013, we used a standard tool to analyse the infrastructure and human resources involved in the delivery of surgical and anaesthetic services in the Fako division in the south-west region of Cameroon. We also estimated the nature and volume of surgical services as a rate per catchment population. RESULTS Public, private and mission hospital contributed equally to the delivery of surgical services in the Fako. For every 100,000 people, there were <5 operative rooms. A total of 2460 surgical interventions were performed by 2.2 surgeons, 1.1 gynaecologists and 0.3 anaesthetists. These surgical interventions consisted mostly of minor and emergency procedures. Neurosurgery, paediatric, thoracic and endocrine surgery were almost non-existent. CONCLUSIONS The volume of surgery delivered in the Fako is far below the minimum rates required to meet up with the most basic requirements of the populations. It is likely that most of these surgical needs are left unattended. A community-based assessment of unmet surgical needs is necessary to accurately estimate the magnitude of the problem and guide surgical capacity improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Chichom-Mefire
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon. .,Department of Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Regional Hospital Limbe, Limbe, Cameroon.
| | - Victor Mbome Njie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.,Regional Delegation of Public Health, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Vincent Verla
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Julius Atashili
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shrime MG, Sekidde S, Linden A, Cohen JL, Weinstein MC, Salomon JA. Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0168867. [PMID: 28036357 PMCID: PMC5201287 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting. METHODS Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum. FINDINGS Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term "surgical mission trip". These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G. Shrime
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Office of Global Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Serufusa Sekidde
- Aspen Global Health and Development, Aspen Institute, Aspen, CO, United States of America
| | - Allison Linden
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Jessica L. Cohen
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Milton C. Weinstein
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joshua A. Salomon
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saxton AT, Poenaru D, Ozgediz D, Ameh EA, Farmer D, Smith ER, Rice HE. Economic Analysis of Children's Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165480. [PMID: 27792792 PMCID: PMC5085034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the economic value of health interventions is essential for policy makers to make informed resource allocation decisions. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize available information on the economic impact of children’s surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We searched MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles published between Jan. 1996 and Jan. 2015. We summarized reported cost information for individual interventions by country, including all costs, disability weights, health outcome measurements (most commonly disability-adjusted life years [DALYs] averted) and cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs). We calculated median CER as well as societal economic benefits (using a human capital approach) by procedure group across all studies. The methodological quality of each article was assessed using the Drummond checklist and the overall quality of evidence was summarized using a scale adapted from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Findings We identified 86 articles that met inclusion criteria, spanning 36 groups of surgical interventions. The procedure group with the lowest median CER was inguinal hernia repair ($15/DALY). The procedure group with the highest median societal economic benefit was neurosurgical procedures ($58,977). We found a wide range of study quality, with only 35% of studies having a Drummond score ≥ 7. Interpretation Our findings show that many areas of children’s surgical care are extremely cost-effective in LMICs, provide substantial societal benefits, and are an appropriate target for enhanced investment. Several areas, including inguinal hernia repair, trichiasis surgery, cleft lip and palate repair, circumcision, congenital heart surgery and orthopedic procedures, should be considered “Essential Pediatric Surgical Procedures” as they offer considerable economic value. However, there are major gaps in existing research quality and methodology which limit our current understanding of the economic value of surgical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony T. Saxton
- Duke Global Health Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Dan Poenaru
- McMaster Paediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Dept. of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Doruk Ozgediz
- Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | | | - Diana Farmer
- University of California-Davis Health System, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Emily R. Smith
- Duke Global Health Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Henry E. Rice
- Duke Global Health Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gelband H, Sankaranarayanan R, Gauvreau CL, Horton S, Anderson BO, Bray F, Cleary J, Dare AJ, Denny L, Gospodarowicz MK, Gupta S, Howard SC, Jaffray DA, Knaul F, Levin C, Rabeneck L, Rajaraman P, Sullivan T, Trimble EL, Jha P. Costs, affordability, and feasibility of an essential package of cancer control interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet 2016; 387:2133-2144. [PMID: 26578033 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00755-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Investments in cancer control--prevention, detection, diagnosis, surgery, other treatment, and palliative care--are increasingly needed in low-income and particularly in middle-income countries, where most of the world's cancer deaths occur without treatment or palliation. To help countries expand locally appropriate services, Cancer (the third volume of nine in Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition) developed an essential package of potentially cost-effective measures for countries to consider and adapt. Interventions included in the package are: prevention of tobacco-related cancer and virus-related liver and cervical cancers; diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer, cervical cancer, and selected childhood cancers; and widespread availability of palliative care, including opioids. These interventions would cost an additional US$20 billion per year worldwide, constituting 3% of total public spending on health in low-income and middle-income countries. With implementation of an appropriately tailored package, most countries could substantially reduce suffering and premature death from cancer before 2030, with even greater improvements in later decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hellen Gelband
- Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | - Cindy L Gauvreau
- Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Anna J Dare
- Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Sumit Gupta
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott C Howard
- Health Sciences Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Terrence Sullivan
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Prabhat Jha
- Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sullivan R, Alatise OI, Anderson BO, Audisio R, Autier P, Aggarwal A, Balch C, Brennan MF, Dare A, D'Cruz A, Eggermont AMM, Fleming K, Gueye SM, Hagander L, Herrera CA, Holmer H, Ilbawi AM, Jarnheimer A, Ji JF, Kingham TP, Liberman J, Leather AJM, Meara JG, Mukhopadhyay S, Murthy SS, Omar S, Parham GP, Pramesh CS, Riviello R, Rodin D, Santini L, Shrikhande SV, Shrime M, Thomas R, Tsunoda AT, van de Velde C, Veronesi U, Vijaykumar DK, Watters D, Wang S, Wu YL, Zeiton M, Purushotham A. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol 2016; 16:1193-224. [PMID: 26427363 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 437] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is essential for global cancer care in all resource settings. Of the 15.2 million new cases of cancer in 2015, over 80% of cases will need surgery, some several times. By 2030, we estimate that annually 45 million surgical procedures will be needed worldwide. Yet, less than 25% of patients with cancer worldwide actually get safe, affordable, or timely surgery. This Commission on global cancer surgery, building on Global Surgery 2030, has examined the state of global cancer surgery through an analysis of the burden of surgical disease and breadth of cancer surgery, economics and financing, factors for strengthening surgical systems for cancer with multiple-country studies, the research agenda, and the political factors that frame policy making in this area. We found wide equity and economic gaps in global cancer surgery. Many patients throughout the world do not have access to cancer surgery, and the failure to train more cancer surgeons and strengthen systems could result in as much as US $6.2 trillion in lost cumulative gross domestic product by 2030. Many of the key adjunct treatment modalities for cancer surgery--e.g., pathology and imaging--are also inadequate. Our analysis identified substantial issues, but also highlights solutions and innovations. Issues of access, a paucity of investment in public surgical systems, low investment in research, and training and education gaps are remarkably widespread. Solutions include better regulated public systems, international partnerships, super-centralisation of surgical services, novel surgical clinical trials, and new approaches to improve quality and scale up cancer surgical systems through education and training. Our key messages are directed at many global stakeholders, but the central message is that to deliver safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery to all, surgery must be at the heart of global and national cancer control planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK; King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Benjamin O Anderson
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Charles Balch
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Anna Dare
- Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil D'Cruz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Kenneth Fleming
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Serigne Magueye Gueye
- University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal; Grand Yoff General Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Lars Hagander
- Paediatric Surgery and Global Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Cristian A Herrera
- Cabinet of the Minister, Ministry of Health, Santiago, Chile; Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hampus Holmer
- Paediatric Surgery and Global Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - André M Ilbawi
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anton Jarnheimer
- Paediatric Surgery and Global Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jia-Fu Ji
- Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China; Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Tianjin, China
| | | | | | - Andrew J M Leather
- King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK
| | - John G Meara
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Swagoto Mukhopadhyay
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shilpa S Murthy
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of General Surgery, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | | | - Groesbeck P Parham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - C S Pramesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Robert Riviello
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danielle Rodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luiz Santini
- INCA (Brazilian National Cancer Institute), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Mark Shrime
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Thomas
- Department of Health & Human Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Audrey T Tsunoda
- Gyne-Oncology Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Cornelis van de Velde
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Endocrine and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - David Watters
- Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Shan Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China; Chinese College of Surgeons, Beijing, China
| | - Yi-Long Wu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Moez Zeiton
- Sadeq Institute, Tripoli, Libya; Trauma and Orthopaedic Rotation, North-West Deanery, Manchester, UK
| | - Arnie Purushotham
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, UK; King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shrime MG, Verguet S, Johansson KA, Desalegn D, Jamison DT, Kruk ME. Task-sharing or public finance for the expansion of surgical access in rural Ethiopia: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Policy Plan 2015; 31:706-16. [PMID: 26719347 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite a high burden of surgical disease, access to surgical services in low- and middle-income countries is often limited. In line with the World Health Organization's current focus on universal health coverage and equitable access to care, we examined how policies to expand access to surgery in rural Ethiopia would impact health, impoverishment and equity. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Deterministic and stochastic models of surgery in rural Ethiopia were constructed, utilizing pooled estimates of costs and probabilities from national surveys and published literature. Model calibration and validation were performed against published estimates, with sensitivity analyses on model assumptions to check for robustness. Outcomes of interest were the number of deaths averted, the number of cases of poverty averted and the number of cases of catastrophic expenditure averted for each policy, divided across wealth quintiles. Health benefits, financial risk protection and equity appear to be in tension in the expansion of access to surgical care in rural Ethiopia. Health benefits from each of the examined policies accrued primarily to the poor. However, without travel vouchers, many policies also induced impoverishment in the poor while providing financial risk protection to the rich, calling into question the equitable distribution of benefits by these policies. Adding travel vouchers removed the impoverishing effects of a policy but decreased the health benefit that could be bought per dollar spent. These results were robust to sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Shrime
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, Office of Global Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA,
| | - Stéphane Verguet
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kjell Arne Johansson
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway
| | - Dawit Desalegn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Addis Ababa University School of Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and
| | - Dean T Jamison
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Margaret E Kruk
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grimes CE, Billingsley ML, Dare AJ, Day N, George PM, Kamara TB, Mkandawire NC, Leather A, Lavy CBD. The demographics of patients affected by surgical disease in district hospitals in two sub-Saharan African countries: a retrospective descriptive analysis. SPRINGERPLUS 2015; 4:750. [PMID: 26693108 PMCID: PMC4666885 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1496-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing awareness of the importance of surgical disease within global health. We hypothesised that surgical disease in low income countries predominantly affects young adults and may therefore have a significant economic impact. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all surgical admission data from two rural government district hospitals in two different sub-Saharan African countries over a 6-month period. We analysed all surgical admissions with respect to patient demographics (age and gender), diagnosis, and procedure performed. RESULTS Surgical admissions accounted for 12.9 and 19.8 % of all hospital admissions in Malawi and Sierra Leone respectively. 18.5 and 6.2 % of all hospital patients required a surgical procedure in Malawi and Sierra Leone respectively, with the low number in Sierra Leone accounted for in that many of the obstetric admissions were referred to a nearby Medicins Sans Frontiers (MSF) hospital for treatment. 17.9 and 10.5 % of surgical admissions were under the age of 16 in Malawi and Sierra Leone respectively, with 16-35 year olds accounting for 57.3 % of surgical admissions in Sierra Leone and 53.5 % in Malawi. Men accounted for 53.7 and 46.0 % of surgical admissions in Sierra Leone and Malawi respectively. An unexpected finding was the high level of patients who absconded from hospital in Sierra Leone after diagnosis but before treatment. This involved 11.8 % of all surgical patients, including 38 % with a bowel obstruction, 39 % with peritonitis and 20 % with ectopic pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Most people affected by disease requiring surgery are young adults and this may have significant economic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caris E Grimes
- King's Centre for Global Health, Weston Education Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | | | - Anna J Dare
- King's Centre for Global Health, Weston Education Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | - Nigel Day
- Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter M George
- Bo Hospital, Bo, Sierra Leone ; Port Loko Government Hospital, Port Loko, Sierra Leone ; School of Community Health and Clinical Sciences, Njala University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Thaim B Kamara
- Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone ; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Nyengo C Mkandawire
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Blantyre, Malawi ; School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andy Leather
- King's Centre for Global Health, Weston Education Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shulman LN, Wagner CM, Barr R, Lopes G, Longo G, Robertson J, Forte G, Torode J, Magrini N. Proposing Essential Medicines to Treat Cancer: Methodologies, Processes, and Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:69-75. [PMID: 26578613 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.8736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A great proportion of the world's cancer burden resides in low- and middle-income countries where cancer care infrastructure is often weak or absent. Although treatment of cancer is multidisciplinary, involving surgery, radiation, systemic therapies, pathology, radiology, and other specialties, selection of medicines that have impact and are affordable has been particularly challenging in resource-constrained settings. In 2014, at the invitation of the WHO, the Union for International Cancer Control convened experts to develop an approach to propose essential cancer medicines to be included in the WHO Model Essential Medicines Lists (EML) for Adults and for Children, as well as a resulting new list of cancer medicines. METHODS Experts identified 29 cancer types with potential for maximal treatment impact, on the basis of incidence and benefit of systemic therapies. More than 90 oncology experts from all continents drafted and reviewed disease-based documents outlining epidemiology, diagnostic needs, treatment options, and benefits and toxicities. RESULTS Briefing documents were created for each disease, along with associated standard treatment regimens, resulting in a list of 52 cancer medicines. A comprehensive application was submitted as a revision to the existing cancer medicines on the WHO Model Lists. In May 2015, the WHO announced the addition of 16 medicines to the Adult EML and nine medicines to the Children's EML. CONCLUSION The list of medications proposed, and the ability to link each recommended medicine to specific diseases, should allow public officials to apply resources most effectively in developing and supporting nascent or growing cancer treatment programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence N Shulman
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Claire M Wagner
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Ronald Barr
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Gilberto Lopes
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Longo
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Jane Robertson
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Gilles Forte
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Julie Torode
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Magrini
- Lawrence N. Shulman and Claire M. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lawrence N. Shulman, Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Claire M. Wagner and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control; Jane Robertson, Gilles Forte, and Nicola Magrini, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ronald Barr, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Gilberto Lopes, Centro Paulista de Oncologia e Hcor Onco, São Paulo, Brazil; Gilberto Lopes, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Giuseppe Longo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, Bickler SW, Conteh L, Dare AJ, Davies J, Mérisier ED, El-Halabi S, Farmer PE, Gawande A, Gillies R, Greenberg SLM, Grimes CE, Gruen RL, Ismail EA, Kamara TB, Lavy C, Lundeg G, Mkandawire NC, Raykar NP, Riesel JN, Rodas E, Rose J, Roy N, Shrime MG, Sullivan R, Verguet S, Watters D, Weiser TG, Wilson IH, Yamey G, Yip W. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 2015; 386:569-624. [PMID: 25924834 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60160-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2337] [Impact Index Per Article: 233.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John G Meara
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Andrew J M Leather
- King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lars Hagander
- Pediatric Surgery and Global Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Blake C Alkire
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nivaldo Alonso
- Plastic Surgery Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Emmanuel A Ameh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Peadiatric Surgery, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Stephen W Bickler
- Rady Children's Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lesong Conteh
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Anna J Dare
- King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Paul E Farmer
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Division of Global Health Equity, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Partners in Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Atul Gawande
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Ariadne Labs Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rowan Gillies
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah L M Greenberg
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Caris E Grimes
- King's Centre for Global Health, King's Health Partners and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Russell L Gruen
- The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | - Thaim Buya Kamara
- Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone; Department of Surgery, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Chris Lavy
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ganbold Lundeg
- Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - Nyengo C Mkandawire
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi; School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nakul P Raykar
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Johanna N Riesel
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edgar Rodas
- The Cinterandes Foundation, Universidad del Cuenca, and Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador; Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador
| | - John Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Mark G Shrime
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Office of Global Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, Kings Health Partners Integrated Cancer Centre, King's Centre for Global Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stéphane Verguet
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Watters
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, East Melbourne, and Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Thomas G Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Iain H Wilson
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Gavin Yamey
- Evidence to Policy Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Winnie Yip
- Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
O'Neill KM, Mandigo M, Pyda J, Nazaire Y, Greenberg SLM, Gillies R, Damuse R. Out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients obtaining free breast cancer care in Haiti: A pilot study. Surgery 2015; 158:747-55. [PMID: 26150200 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2014] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women in low- and middle-income countries account for 51% of breast cancer cases globally. These patients often delay seeking care and, therefore, present with advanced disease, partly because of fear of catastrophic health care expenses. Although there have been efforts to make health care affordable in low- and middle-income countries, the financial burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses for nonmedical costs, such as transportation and lost wages, often is overlooked. METHODS An institutional review board exemption was granted from Boston Children's Hospital and Partners in Health/Zanmi Lasante for this cross-sectional study. In total, 61 patients receiving breast cancer care free of charge at Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM) in Haiti were selected via convenience sampling. They were interviewed between March and May 2014 to quantify the expenses they incurred during the course of diagnosis and treatment. These expenses included medical costs at outside facilities, as well as nonmedical costs (eg, transportation, meals, etc). RESULTS The median, nonmedical OOP expenses incurred by breast cancer patients at HUM were $233 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] $170-304) for diagnostic visits, $259 (95% CI $200-533) for chemotherapy visits, and $38 (95% CI $23-140) for surgery visits. The median total OOP expense (including medical costs) was $717 (95% CI $619-1,171). To pay for these expenses, 52% of participants stated that they went into debt; however, the amount of debt was not quantified. The median income of these patients was $1,333 (95% CI $778-2,640), and the median sum of OOP expenses and lost wages was $2,996 (95% CI $1,676-5,179). CONCLUSION Despite receiving free care: at HUM, more than two-thirds of participants met conservative criteria for catastrophic medical expenses (defined as spending more than 40% of their potential household income on OOP payments). Further studies are needed to understand the magnitude of OOP health care expenses for the poor worldwide, how to aid them during their treatment program, and its impact on their health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M O'Neill
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic & Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Morgan Mandigo
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic & Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Jordan Pyda
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Sarah L M Greenberg
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Rowan Gillies
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic & Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Ruth Damuse
- Zanmi Lasante/Partners in Health, Mirebalais, Haiti
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ilbawi AM, Anderson BO. Global cancer consortiums: moving from consensus to practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:719-27. [PMID: 25623597 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4346-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND DESIGN The failure to translate cancer knowledge into action contributes to regional, national, and international health inequities. Disparities in cancer care are the most severe in low-resource settings, where delivery obstacles are compounded by health infrastructure deficits and inadequate basic services. Global cancer consortiums (GCCs) have developed to strengthen cancer care expertise, advance knowledge on best practices, and bridge the cancer gap worldwide. Within the complex matrix of public health priorities, consensus is emerging on cost-effective cancer care interventions in low- and medium-resource countries, which include the critical role of surgical services. Distinct from traditional health partnerships that collaborate to provide care at the local level, GCCs collaborate more broadly to establish consensus on best practice models for service delivery. To realize the benefit of programmatic interventions and achieve tangible improvements in patient outcomes, GCCs must construct and share evidence-based implementation strategies to be tested in real world settings. REVIEW AND CONCLUSIONS Implementation research should inform consensus formation, program delivery, and outcome monitoring to achieve the goals articulated by GCCs. Fundamental steps to successful implementation are: (1) to adopt an integrated, multisectoral plan with local involvement; (2) to define shared implementation priorities by establishing care pathways that avoid prescriptive but suboptimal health care delivery; (3) to build capacity through education, technology transfer, and surveillance of outcomes; and (4) to promote equity and balanced collaboration. GCCs can bridge the gap between what is known and what is done, translating normative sharing of clinical expertise into tangible improvements in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André M Ilbawi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shrime MG, Sleemi A, Ravilla TD. Charitable platforms in global surgery: a systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role training. World J Surg 2015; 39:10-20. [PMID: 24682278 PMCID: PMC4179995 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2516-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was designed to propose a classification scheme for platforms of surgical delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to review the literature documenting their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role in training. Approximately 28 % of the global burden of disease is surgical. In LMICs, much of this burden is borne by a rapidly growing international charitable sector, in fragmented platforms ranging from short-term trips to specialized hospitals. Systematic reviews of these platforms, across regions and across disease conditions, have not been performed. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed from 1960 to 2013. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Bibliographies of retrieved studies were searched by hand. Of the 8,854 publications retrieved, 104 were included. RESULTS Surgery by international charitable organizations is delivered under two, specialized hospitals and temporary platforms. Among the latter, short-term surgical missions were the most common and appeared beneficial when no other option was available. Compared to other platforms, however, worse results and a lack of cost-effectiveness curtailed their role. Self-contained temporary platforms that did not rely on local infrastructure showed promise, based on very few studies. Specialized hospitals provided effective treatment and appeared sustainable; cost-effectiveness evidence was limited. CONCLUSIONS Because the charitable sector delivers surgery in vastly divergent ways, systematic review of these platforms has been difficult. This paper provides a framework from which to study these platforms for surgery in LMICs. Given the available evidence, self-contained temporary platforms and specialized surgical centers appear to provide more effective and cost-effective care than short-term surgical mission trips, except when no other delivery platform exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Shrime
- Harvard Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, 14 Story Street, 4th Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|