1
|
Shehadeh I, Andrade LDE, Silva AILFDA, Iora PH, Knaut EF, Duarte GC, Fontes CER. Open or closed abdomen post laparotomy to control severe abdominal sepsis: a survival analysis. Rev Col Bras Cir 2024; 51:e20243595. [PMID: 38716912 PMCID: PMC11185063 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243595-en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION severe abdominal sepsis, accompained by diffuse peritonitis, poses a significant challenge for most surgeons. It often requires repetitive surgical interventions, leading to complications and resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. The open abdomen technique, facilitated by applying a negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), reduces the duration of the initial surgical procedure, minimizes the accumulation of secretions and inflammatory mediators in the abdominal cavity and lowers the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and its associated complications. Another approach is primary closure of the abdominal aponeurosis, which involves suturing the layers of the abdominal wall. METHODS the objective of this study is to conduct a survival analysis comparing the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis using open abdomen technique versus primary closure after laparotomy in a public hospital in the South of Brazil. We utilized data extracted from electronic medical records to perform both descriptive and survival analysis, employing the Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test. RESULTS the study sample encompassed 75 laparotomies conducted over a span of 5 years, with 40 cases employing NPWT and 35 cases utilizing primary closure. The overall mortality rate observed was 55%. Notably, survival rates did not exhibit statistical significance when comparing the two methods, even after stratifying the data into separate analysis groups for each technique. CONCLUSION recent publications on this subject have reported some favorable outcomes associated with the open abdomen technique underscoring the pressing need for a standardized approach to managing patients with severe, complicated abdominal sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imad Shehadeh
- - Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá, Departamento de Cirurgia Geral - Maringá - PR - Brasil
| | - Luciano DE Andrade
- - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Medicina - Maringá - PR - Brasil
| | | | - Pedro Henrique Iora
- - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Medicina - Maringá - PR - Brasil
| | - Eduardo Falco Knaut
- - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Medicina - Maringá - PR - Brasil
| | | | - Carlos Edmundo Rodrigues Fontes
- - Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá, Departamento de Cirurgia Geral - Maringá - PR - Brasil
- - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Medicina - Maringá - PR - Brasil
- - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Programa de Mestrado em Gestão Tecnologia e Inovação em Urgência e Emergência - Maringá - PR - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pepe G, Chiarello MM, Bianchi V, Fico V, Altieri G, Tedesco S, Tropeano G, Molica P, Di Grezia M, Brisinda G. Entero-Cutaneous and Entero-Atmospheric Fistulas: Insights into Management Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1279. [PMID: 38592102 PMCID: PMC10932196 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Enteric fistulas are a common problem in gastrointestinal tract surgery and remain associated with significant mortality rates, due to complications such as sepsis, malnutrition, and electrolyte imbalance. The increasingly widespread use of open abdomen techniques for the initial treatment of abdominal sepsis and trauma has led to the observation of so-called entero-atmospheric fistulas. Because of their clinical complexity, the proper management of enteric fistula requires a multidisciplinary team. The main goal of the treatment is the closure of enteric fistula, but also mortality reduction and improvement of patients' quality of life are fundamental. Successful management of patients with enteric fistula requires the establishment of controlled drainage, management of sepsis, prevention of fluid and electrolyte depletion, protection of the skin, and provision of adequate nutrition. Many of these fistulas will heal spontaneously within 4 to 6 weeks of conservative management. If closure is not accomplished after this time point, surgery is indicated. Despite advances in perioperative care and nutritional support, the mortality remains in the range of 15 to 30%. In more recent years, the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the resolution of enteric fistulas improved the outcomes, so patients can be successfully treated with a non-operative approach. In this review, our intent is to highlight the most important aspects of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of patients with enterocutaneous or entero-atmospheric fistulas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilda Pepe
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Maria Michela Chiarello
- General Surgery Operative Unit, Department of Surgery, Provincial Health Authority, 87100 Cosenza, Italy;
| | - Valentina Bianchi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Valeria Fico
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Gaia Altieri
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Silvia Tedesco
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Tropeano
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Perla Molica
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Marta Di Grezia
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Brisinda
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Department of Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.); (V.F.); (G.A.); (S.T.); (G.T.); (P.M.); (M.D.G.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Catholic School of Medicine “Agostino Gemelli”, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Waele JJ, Coccolini F, Lagunes L, Maseda E, Rausei S, Rubio-Perez I, Theodorakopoulou M, Arvanti K. Optimized Treatment of Nosocomial Peritonitis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1711. [PMID: 38136745 PMCID: PMC10740749 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12121711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
This comprehensive review aims to provide a practical guide for intensivists, focusing on enhancing patient care associated with nosocomial peritonitis (NP). It explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of NP, a significant contributor to the mortality of surgical patients worldwide. NP is, per definition, a hospital-acquired condition and a consequence of gastrointestinal surgery or a complication of other diseases. NP, one of the most prevalent causes of sepsis in surgical Intensive Care Units (ICUs), is often associated with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and high mortality rates. Early clinical suspicion and the utilization of various diagnostic tools like biomarkers and imaging are of great importance. Microbiology is often complex, with antimicrobial resistance escalating in many parts of the world. Fungal peritonitis and its risk factors, diagnostic hurdles, and effective management approaches are particularly relevant in patients with NP. Contemporary antimicrobial strategies for treating NP are discussed, including drug resistance challenges and empirical antibiotic regimens. The importance of source control in intra-abdominal infection management, including surgical and non-surgical interventions, is also emphasized. A deeper exploration into the role of open abdomen treatment as a potential option for selected patients is proposed, indicating an area for further investigation. This review underscores the need for more research to advance the best treatment strategies for NP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan J. De Waele
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Leonel Lagunes
- Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca CRIPS, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, 78210 San Luis Potosi, Mexico
| | - Emilio Maseda
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hospital Quironsalud Valle del Henares, 28850 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Stefano Rausei
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Cittiglio-Angera Hospital, ASST SetteLaghi, 21100 Varese, Italy;
| | - Ines Rubio-Perez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (Idipaz), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Theodorakopoulou
- 1st Department of Critical Care Medicine & Pulmonary Services, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, 10675 Athens, Greece;
| | - Kostoula Arvanti
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, 54646 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Risinger WB, Smith JW. Damage control surgery in emergency general surgery: What you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95:770-779. [PMID: 37439768 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Damage-control surgery (DCS) is a strategy adopted to limit initial operative interventions in the unstable surgical patient, delaying definitive repairs and abdominal wall closure until physiologic parameters have improved. Although this concept of "physiology over anatomy" was initially described in the management of severely injured trauma patients, the approaches of DCS have become common in the management of nontraumatic intra-abdominal emergencies.While the utilization of damage-control methods in emergency general surgery (EGS) is controversial, numerous studies have demonstrated improved outcomes, making DCS an essential technique for all acute care surgeons. Following a brief history of DCS and its indications in the EGS patient, the phases of DCS will be discussed including an in-depth review of preoperative resuscitation, techniques for intra-abdominal source control, temporary abdominal closure, intensive care unit (ICU) management of the open abdomen, and strategies to improve abdominal wall closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William B Risinger
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fernández LG. Treatment of Complex Thoracic and Abdominal Trauma Patients: A Review of Literature and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Treatment Options. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2023. [PMID: 37672527 DOI: 10.1089/wound.2023.0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Significance: In trauma care, extensive surgical intervention may be required. Damage control surgery (DCS) is applicable to patients with life or limb-threatening conditions that are incapable of tolerating a traditional surgical approach. Recent Advances: The current resuscitation strategy for complex trauma patients includes limiting crystalloid fluids, balanced mass transfusion protocols, permissive hypotension, and damage control resuscitation. Recent technological advancements in surgical critical care have improved outcomes in these critically ill patients. Critical Issues: DCS, which is often required in patients with trauma injuries, is typically followed by surgical correction of the injury once the immediate patient survival procedures have been completed. However, DCS and the subsequent injury repair procedures have a high risk for postsurgical complication development. Future Directions: Negative pressure therapy modalities can offer clinicians additional adjunctive and cost-effective tools for the management of the trauma care patient, as these systems can be utilized during both the DCS and the postoperative injury management phases of trauma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis G Fernández
- Division of Trauma Surgery/Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, Texas, USA
- School of Medicine Bill Barrett Endowed Chair in Trauma Surgery, The University of Texas-Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roberts DJ, Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Mentula P, Björck M, Kirkpatrick AW, Sugrue M, Pereira BM, Petersson U, Coccolini F, Latifi R. The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad084. [PMID: 37882630 PMCID: PMC10601091 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The open abdomen is an innovation that greatly improved surgical understanding of damage control, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, viscera and enteric fistula care, and abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an evidence-informed, expert, comprehensive narrative review of the open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery. METHODS A group of 12 international trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery experts were invited to review current literature and important concepts surrounding the open abdomen. RESULTS The open abdomen may be classified using validated systems developed by a working group in 2009 and modified by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome-The Abdominal Compartment Society in 2013. It may be indicated in major trauma, intra-abdominal sepsis, vascular surgical emergencies, and severe acute pancreatitis; to facilitate second look laparotomy or avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome; and when the abdominal wall cannot be safely closed. Temporary abdominal closure and staged abdominal reconstruction methods include a mesh/sheet, transabdominal wall dynamic fascial traction, negative pressure wound therapy, and hybrid negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial traction. This last method likely has the highest primary fascial closure rates. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is currently an experimental strategy developed to improve primary fascial closure rates and reduce complications in those with an open abdomen. Primary fascial closure rates may be improved by early return to the operating room; limiting use of crystalloid fluids during the surgical interval; and preventing and/or treating intra-abdominal hypertension, enteric fistulae, and intra-abdominal collections after surgery. The majority of failures of primary fascial closure and enteroatmospheric fistula formation may be prevented using effective temporary abdominal closure techniques, providing appropriate resuscitation fluids and nutritional support, and closing the abdomen as early as possible. CONCLUSION Subsequent stages of the innovation of the open abdomen will likely involve the design and conduct of prospective studies to evaluate appropriate indications for its use and effectiveness and safety of the above components of open abdomen management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Roberts
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Panu Mentula
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martin Björck
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions (TMUSMI) Research Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Department of Surgery Letterkenny, University Hospital Donegal, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Bruno M Pereira
- Department of Surgery, Masters Program in Health Applied Sciences, Vassouras University, Vassouras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgery, Campinas Holy House General Surgery Residency Program Director, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ulf Petersson
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Sawyer R, Rasa K, Viaggi B, Abu-Zidan F, Soreide K, Hardcastle T, Gupta D, Bendinelli C, Ceresoli M, Shelat VG, Broek RT, Baiocchi GL, Moore EE, Sall I, Podda M, Bonavina L, Kryvoruchko IA, Stahel P, Inaba K, Montravers P, Sakakushev B, Sganga G, Ballestracci P, Malbrain MLNG, Vincent JL, Pikoulis M, Beka SG, Doklestic K, Chiarugi M, Falcone M, Bignami E, Reva V, Demetrashvili Z, Di Saverio S, Tolonen M, Navsaria P, Bala M, Balogh Z, Litvin A, Hecker A, Wani I, Fette A, De Simone B, Ivatury R, Picetti E, Khokha V, Tan E, Ball C, Tascini C, Cui Y, Coimbra R, Kelly M, Martino C, Agnoletti V, Boermeester MA, De'Angelis N, Chirica M, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L, Kluger Y, Catena F, Kirkpatrick AW. Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:41. [PMID: 37480129 PMCID: PMC10362628 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00509-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Dept., Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
| | | | - Robert Sawyer
- Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | | | - Bruno Viaggi
- ICU Dept., Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Timothy Hardcastle
- Dept. of Health - KwaZulu-Natal, Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal and Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa
| | - Deepak Gupta
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Cino Bendinelli
- Department of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General Surgery Dept., Monza University Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Vishal G Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Richard Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Njmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ibrahima Sall
- Département de Chirurgie, Hôpital Principal de Dakar, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Igor A Kryvoruchko
- Department of Surgery No. 2, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Philip Stahel
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Kenji Inaba
- LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Philippe Montravers
- Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation CHU Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- Research Institute of Medical, University Plovdiv/University Hospital St. George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Ballestracci
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Dept., Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Manos Pikoulis
- General Surgery, Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | | | - Krstina Doklestic
- Clinic of Emergency Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Dept., Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Falcone
- Infectious Disease Dept., Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elena Bignami
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Viktor Reva
- Department of War Surgery, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Dept, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Emergency Surgery, Meilahti Tower Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pradeep Navsaria
- Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit, Hadassah - Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zsolt Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | | | - Imtiaz Wani
- Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, Kashmir, India
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Rao Ivatury
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Edward Tan
- Emergency Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Njmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Chad Ball
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Carlo Tascini
- Infectious Disease Dept., Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Michael Kelly
- Department of General Surgery, Albury Hospital, Albury, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Walt L Biffl
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Scripss Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery, Pavia University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Yoram Kluger
- General Surgery, Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fausto Catena
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Dept, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ciuntu BM, Vintilă D, Tanevski A, Chiriac Ș, Stefănescu G, Abdulan IM, Balan GG, Veliceasa B, Bădulescu OV, Ghiga G, Fătu AM, Georgescu A, Vascu MB, Vasilescu AM. Severe Acute Pancreatitis Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System: Influence of Laboratory Markers. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113721. [PMID: 37297916 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: An open abdomen is a serious medical condition that requires prompt and effective treatment to prevent complications and improve patient outcomes. Negative pressure therapy (NPT) has emerged as a viable therapeutic option for temporary closure of the abdomen, offering several benefits over traditional methods. (2) Methods: We included 15 patients with pancreatitis who were hospitalized in the I-II Surgery Clinic of the Emergency County Hospital "St. Spiridon" from Iasi, Romania, between 2011-2018 and received NPT. (3) Results: Preoperatively, the mean IAP level was 28.62 mmHg, decreasing significantly postoperatively to 21.31 mmHg. The mean level of the highest IAP value recorded in pancreatitis patients treated with VAC did not differ significantly by lethality (30.31 vs. 28.50; p = 0.810). In vacuum-treated pancreatitis patients with a IAP level > 12, the probability of survival dropped below 50% during the first 7 days of stay in the ICU, so that after 20 days the probability of survival was approximately 20%. IAP enters the determinism of surgery with a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 99%, the cut-off value of IAP being 15 mmHg. (4) Conclusions: The timing of surgical decompression in abdominal compartment syndrome is very important. Consequently, it is vital to identify a parameter, easy to measure, within the reach of any clinician, so that the indication for surgical intervention can be made judiciously and without delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Mihnea Ciuntu
- Department of General Surgery, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Dan Vintilă
- Department of General Surgery, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Adelina Tanevski
- Department of General Surgery, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Ștefan Chiriac
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Gabriela Stefănescu
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Irina Mihaela Abdulan
- Department of Medical Specialties I, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Gheorghe G Balan
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Bogdan Veliceasa
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Oana Viola Bădulescu
- Department of Haematholohy, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Gabriela Ghiga
- Department of Mother and Child Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Ana Maria Fătu
- Discipline of Ergonomy, Department of Implantology Removable Denture Technology, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Andrei Georgescu
- Department of Odontology, Periodontology and Fixed Prosthesis, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Mihai Bogdan Vascu
- Department of Odontology, Periodontology and Fixed Prosthesis, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | - Alin Mihai Vasilescu
- Department of General Surgery, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kirkpatrick AW, Coccolini F, Tolonen M, Minor S, Catena F, Gois E, Doig CJ, Hill MD, Ansaloni L, Chiarugi M, Tartaglia D, Ioannidis O, Sugrue M, Colak E, Hameed SM, Lampela H, Agnoletti V, McKee JL, Garraway N, Sartelli M, Ball CG, Parry NG, Voght K, Julien L, Kroeker J, Roberts DJ, Faris P, Tiruta C, Moore EE, Ammons LA, Anestiadou E, Bendinelli C, Bouliaris K, Carroll R, Ceresoli M, Favi F, Gurrado A, Rezende-Neto J, Isik A, Cremonini C, Strambi S, Koukoulis G, Testini M, Trpcic S, Pasculli A, Picariello E, Abu-Zidan F, Adeyeye A, Augustin G, Alconchel F, Altinel Y, Hernandez Amin LA, Aranda-Narváez JM, Baraket O, Biffl WL, Baiocchi GL, Bonavina L, Brisinda G, Cardinali L, Celotti A, Chaouch M, Chiarello M, Costa G, de'Angelis N, De Manzini N, Delibegovic S, Di Saverio S, De Simone B, Dubuisson V, Fransvea P, Garulli G, Giordano A, Gomes C, Hayati F, Huang J, Ibrahim AF, Huei TJ, Jailani RF, Khan M, Luna AP, Malbrain MLNG, Marwah S, McBeth P, Mihailescu A, Morello A, Mulita F, Murzi V, Mohammad AT, Parmar S, Pak A, Wong MPK, Pantalone D, Podda M, Puccioni C, Rasa K, Ren J, Roscio F, Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Sganga G, Scheiterle M, Slavchev M, Smirnov D, Tosi L, Trivedi A, Vega JAG, Waledziak M, Xenaki S, Winter D, Wu X, Zakaria AD, Zakaria Z. The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:33. [PMID: 37170123 PMCID: PMC10173926 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00500-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study. METHODS The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer. DISCUSSION OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION National Institutes of Health ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, EG23T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Samuel Minor
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Emanuel Gois
- Department of Surgery, Londrina State University, and National COOL Coordinator for Brazil, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Christopher J Doig
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery I, San Matteo Hospital Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Orestis Ioannidis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Elif Colak
- University of Samsun, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - S Morad Hameed
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hanna Lampela
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Jessica L McKee
- Global Project Manager, COOL Trial and the TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions Research Group, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Naisan Garraway
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery, Macerata, Italy
| | - Chad G Ball
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Neil G Parry
- Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Voght
- Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Julien
- Department of Surgery, NSHA-Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jenna Kroeker
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek J Roberts
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Elissavet Anestiadou
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos Bouliaris
- General Surgery Department of Koutlimbaneio, Triantafylleio General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | | | - Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Favi
- Chirurgia Generale E d'Urgenza, Ospedale M. Bufalini - Cesena, AUSL Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Joao Rezende-Neto
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arda Isik
- General Surgery Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silivia Strambi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Georgios Koukoulis
- General Surgery Department of Koutlimbaneio, Triantafylleio General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Sandy Trpcic
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Picariello
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale M. Buffalini Di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ademola Adeyeye
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Afe Babalola University Multisystem Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Goran Augustin
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital IMIB-Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, S/N, Murcia, Spain
| | - Yuksel Altinel
- Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Luz Adriana Hernandez Amin
- Nurse Master of Nursing, Professor and Coordinator of the teaching-service relationship, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sucre, Sincelejo, Colombia
| | - José Manuel Aranda-Narváez
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit. General, Digestive and Transplantation Surgery Department, University Regional Hospital of Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brisinda
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Cardinali
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Madonna del Soccorso, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Andrea Celotti
- General Surgery Unit, UO Chirurgia Generale - Ospedale Maggiore Di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Mohamed Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Monastir University, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Maria Chiarello
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Di Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Colorectal and Digestive Surgery Unit-DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital AP-HP, University Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Nicolo De Manzini
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Samir Delibegovic
- Department of Proctology, Clinic for Surgery, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Unit of Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Clinique Saint Louis, Poissy, Poissy, Ile de France, France
- Unit of Emergency and General Surgery, Guastalla Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Guastalla, Italy
| | - Vincent Dubuisson
- Chirurgie Digestive, Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire Et, Générale University Hospital of Bordeaux FR, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Alessio Giordano
- Emergency and General Consultant Surgeon, Nuovo Ospedale "S. Stefano", Azienda ASL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Carlos Gomes
- Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, SUPREMA, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Jinjian Huang
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | | | | | | | - Mansoor Khan
- General Surgery, University Hospitals, Sussex, UK
| | | | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | | | | | - Alessia Morello
- Department of General Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital - San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy, Italy
| | - Francesk Mulita
- Department of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Greece
| | - Valentina Murzi
- Department of Surgical Science, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | | | - Ajay Pak
- Department of General Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India
| | - Michael Pak-Kai Wong
- School of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | | | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Caterina Puccioni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of General Surgery, Hüseyin Kemal Raşa, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Jianan Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Francesco Roscio
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Antonio Gonzalez-Sanchez
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit. General, Digestive and Transplantation Surgery Department, University Regional Hospital of Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maximilian Scheiterle
- Emergency Surgery Unit and Trauma Team, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Dmitry Smirnov
- Department of Surgery, South Ural State Medical University, Chelyabinsk City, Russia
| | - Lorenzo Tosi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sofia Xenaki
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Xiuwen Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Andee Dzulkarnean Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences and Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Georgetown, Malaysia
| | - Zaidi Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences and Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Georgetown, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sibilla MG, Cremonini C, Portinari M, Carcoforo P, Tartaglia D, Cicuttin E, Musetti S, Strambi S, Sartelli M, Radica MK, Catena F, Chiarugi M, Coccolini F, Salvetti F, Negoi I, Zese M, Occhionorelli S, Shlyapnikov S, Sugrue M, Demetrashvili Z, Dondossola D, Ioannidis O, Novelli G, Frattini C, Nacoti M, Khor D, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Kaussen T, Jusoh AC, Ghannam W, Sakakushev B, Guetta O, Dogjani A, Costa S, Singh S, Damaskos D, Isik A, Yuan KC, Trotta F, Rausei S, Martinez-Perez A, Bellanova G, Fonseca VC, Hernández F, Marinis A, Fernandes W, Quiodettis M, Bala M, Vereczkei A, Curado R, Fraga GP, Pereira BM, Gachabayov M, Chagerben GP, Arellano ML, Ozyazici S, Costa G, Tezcaner T, Porta M, Li Y, Karateke F, Manatakis D, Mariani F, Lora F, Sahderov I, Atanasov B, Zegarra S, Fattori L, Ivatury R, Xiao J, Ben-Ishay O, Zharikov A, Dubuisson V. Patients with an Open Abdomen in Asian, American and European Continents: A Comparative Analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA). World J Surg 2023; 47:142-151. [PMID: 36326921 PMCID: PMC9726668 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06733-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International register of open abdomen (IROA) enrolls patients from several centers in American, European, and Asiatic continent. The aim of our study is to compare the characteristics, management and clinical outcome of adult patients treated with OA in the three continents. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the international register of open abdomen (IROA). TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02382770. RESULTS 1183 patients were enrolled from American, European and Asiatic Continent. Median age was 63 years (IQR 49-74) and was higher in the European continent (65 years, p < 0.001); 57% were male. The main indication for OA was peritonitis (50.6%) followed by trauma (15.4%) and vascular emergency (13.5%) with differences among the continents (p < 0.001). Commercial NPWT was preferred in America and Europe (77.4% and 52.3% of cases) while Barker vacuum pack (48.2%) was the preferred temporary abdominal closure technique in Asia (p < 0.001). Definitive abdominal closure was achieved in 82.3% of cases in America (fascial closure in 90.2% of cases) and in 56.4% of cases in Asia (p < 0.001). Prosthesis were mostly used in Europe (17.3%, p < 0.001). The overall entero-atmospheric fistula rate 2.5%. Median open abdomen duration was 4 days (IQR 2-7). The overall intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay were, respectively, 8 and 11 days (no differences between continents). The overall morbidity and mortality rates for America, Europe, and Asia were, respectively, 75.8%, 75.3%, 91.8% (p = 0.001) and 31.9%, 51.6%, 56.9% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There is no uniformity in OA management in the different continents. Heterogeneous adherence to international guidelines application is evident. Different temporary abdominal closure techniques in relation to indications led to different outcomes across the continents. Adherence to guidelines, combined with more consistent data, will ultimately allow to improving knowledge and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Sibilla
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Mattia Portinari
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Serena Musetti
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Strambi
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Margherita Koleva Radica
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisia,1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Collins R, Dhanasekara CS, Morris E, Marschke B, Dissanaike S. Simple suture whipstitch closure is a reasonable option for many patients requiring temporary abdominal closure for blunt or penetrating trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2022; 7:e000980. [PMID: 36304556 PMCID: PMC9594533 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Multiple temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques are currently used to manage the open abdomen (OA) in severely injured trauma patients, with variability in efficacy and cost. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of two commonly used TAC methods: ABTHERA Negative Pressure Therapy System and whipstitch suture closure (WC). Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had blunt or penetrating trauma from 2015 to 2021 with OA managed using either ABTHERA, WC, or both. Primary outcomes included overall and intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, number of laparotomies, time to definitive fascial closure, and complications (bleeding, evisceration, wound dehiscence, and reoperation). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare baseline characteristics, outcomes, and complications. Potential mediators of the relationship between the type of TAC and outcomes were explored using mediation analyses. Results A total of 112 TAC were analyzed; 86 patients had a single type of TAC placement (either WC or ABTHERA), whereas 26 had both types. A majority of patients had blunt trauma in both WC (77%) and ABTHERA (76%) cohorts. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, including injury severity (27.5±12.4 and 27.5±12.0 for ABTHERA and WC, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference among individual complications and overall complications (OR=0.622 (0.274 to 1.412)). No differences were found between the outcomes, and any apparent differences seen were mediated by factors such as a higher number of laparotomies. Conclusion WC is a low-cost option for TAC in trauma, with similar clinical outcomes and complications to ABTHERA. Level of evidence Level III therapeutic/care management study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reagan Collins
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | | | - Erin Morris
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Brianna Marschke
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Sharmila Dissanaike
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Open Abdomen. J Surg Res 2022; 278:100-110. [PMID: 35597024 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is commonly used in open abdomen management, where there may be a simultaneous need for prevention of abdominal hypertension, tamponade of hemorrhage, and continuous fascial tension. The regional pressure dynamics of vacuum dressings are poorly understood. METHODS Three duroc swine underwent mid-line laparotomy and application of vacuum open abdomen dressing, with and without sponge packing. Twenty-five catheters were placed throughout the abdomen to capture and record pressures in each quadrant as the vacuum system was ranged between (-75 mmHg to -200 mmHg pressure). Vital signs and ventilator pressures were measured and recorded concomitantly. RESULTS No variations in ventilatory pressures or vital signs were observed with any setting. NPWT changed pressure in seven of seventy-five catheters (9%), five of which were related to abdominal packing. When data were grouped into abdominal wall, perihepatic, perisplenic, and deep abdominal regions, there was no significant change in abdominal pressure when packing was absent. With packing, only the abdominal wall region showed a pressure change, reaching a maximum of 20% of the set vacuum pressure. CONCLUSIONS NPWT does only little to change the intraabdominal pressure, except in superficial locations in packed abdomens and does not appear to cause hemodynamic changes in a porcine open abdomen model. While NPWT may play an important role in fluid scavenging and fascial tensioning, there are likely to be few benefits or drawbacks specifically related to negative abdominal pressure in the deep abdomen.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tanahashi Y, Sato H, Kawakami A, Sasaki S, Nishinari Y, Ishida K, Kojika M, Endo S, Inoue Y, Sasaki A. Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2022; 7:e000860. [PMID: 35340705 PMCID: PMC8905971 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with damage control laparotomy (DCL), infusion volume and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure. The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume. Methods This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/colostomy in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity. Results Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT, including 19 cases of repair, 17 of colostomy, and 37 of anastomosis. In 16 patients (trauma 5, sepsis 11) with early anastomosis and 21 patients (trauma 16, sepsis 5) with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group. Conclusion Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated. Level of evidence Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohta Tanahashi
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Hisaho Sato
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Akiko Kawakami
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Shusaku Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Yutaka Nishinari
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Kaoru Ishida
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kojika
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Shigeatsu Endo
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.,Morioka Yuai Hospital, Iwate, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Inoue
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Akira Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Curr Probl Surg 2021; 58:100971. [PMID: 34836571 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.100971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
15
|
Comparative outcomes of open abdominal therapy after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm via open and endovascular approaches. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 77:164-171. [PMID: 34411674 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open abdomen therapy is sometimes a necessary lifesaving procedure after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). OAT aims to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). This study aims to evaluate our experience with open abdomen therapy (OAT) after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study METHODS: Medical records were retrieved for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients who underwent open surgical repair (OS) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between January 1, 2008 and December 12, 2015 from a single center. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed with statistical significance. RESULTS The study included 171 patients. Thirty-three patients (19.3%) required OAT. A smaller percentage of patients required OAT after EVAR (9.8%) compared to OS (23.3%) (P = 0.05). Patients with OAT also had a significantly longer operation (257 vs. 202.7 minutes; P < 0.05), required more intra-operative fluids (15,700 vs. 8,050 mL; P < 0.05), had a longer hospital stay (20 vs. 8.5 days; P < 0.05), and had a higher peri-operative mortality rate (48.5% vs 25.4%; P < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, a lower preoperative SBP (OR 0.9, P = 0.01) and history of hypertension (OR 0.3, P = 0.02) were protective against OAT, while longer operative duration increased the risk of OAT (OR: 1.27, P = 0.05). Mean duration of OAT prior to closure was 4.76 days. Comparing OS patients (transperitoneal and retroperitoneal) that underwent OAT closure, patients who had a retroperitoneal repair received less intra-operative fluids (13.79 vs. 19.11 L; P = 0.212), had earlier return of bowel function (10 vs. 16.9 days; P = 0.08), and a shorter hospital stay (19.9 vs. 32.2 days; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS OAT is a lifesaving procedure that is associated with higher morbidity and mortality following OS and EVAR for rAAA. Patients with longer operations and extensive fluid resuscitation are at higher risk for OAT following rAAAs. Preoperative permissive hypotension may be protective against OAT. OAT following the RP approach to rAAA is associated with earlier abdominal wall closure, earlier bowel recovery, and shorter hospital stay.
Collapse
|
16
|
Should Negative Pressure Therapy Replace Any Other Temporary Abdominal Closure Device in Open-Abdomen Management of Secondary Peritonitis? Surg Technol Int 2021. [PMID: 33844240 DOI: 10.52198/21.sti.38.gs1386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM To clarify the advantages of negative pressure therapy (NPT) compared to other methods of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of secondary peritonitis. METHODS We retraced the history of known methods of TAC, and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated as the NPT mechanisms, both from the macroscopic that bio-molecular point of view, well suits to manage this difficult condition. RESULTS The ideal TAC technique should be quick to apply, easy to change, protect and contain the abdominal viscera, decrease bowel edema, prevent loss of domain and abdominal compartment syndrome, limit contamination, allow egress of peritoneal fluid (and its estimation) and not result in adhesions. It should also be cost-effective, minimize the number of dressing changes and the number of surgical revisions, and ensure a high rate of early closure with a low rate of complications (especially entero-atmospheric fistula). For NPT, the reported fistula rate is 7%, primary fascial closure ranges from 33 to 100% (average 60%) and the mortality rate is about 20%. With the use of NPT as TAC, it may be possible to extend the window of time to achieve primary fascial closure (for up to 20-40 days). CONCLUSION NPT has several potential advantages in open-abdomen (OA) management of secondary peritonitis and may make it possible to achieve all the goals suggested above for an ideal TAC system. Only trained staff should use NPT, following the manufacturer's instructions when commercial products are used. Even if there was a significant evolution in OA management, we believe that further research into the role of NPT for secondary peritonitis is necessary.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hirata M, Hasegawa K, Kasuga Y, Haiden A, Ikenoue S, Yamamoto R, Tanaka M, Sasaki J, Ochiai D. A case of abdominal compartment syndrome caused by amniotic fluid embolism treated with ABTHERA™ therapy: World's first report in the obstetric field. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 60:579-580. [PMID: 33966755 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Momo Hirata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Keita Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Kasuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Akina Haiden
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Satoru Ikenoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Ryo Yamamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Mamoru Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Junichi Sasaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Daigo Ochiai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu X, Wu J, Wang P, Fang X, Yu Y, Tang J, Xiao Y, Wang M, Li S, Zhang Y, Hu B, Ma T, Li Q, Wang Z, Wu A, Liu C, Dai M, Ma X, Yi H, Kang Y, Wang D, Han G, Zhang P, Wang J, Yuan Y, Wang D, Wang J, Zhou Z, Ren Z, Liu Y, Guan X, Ren J. Diagnosis and Management of Intraabdominal Infection: Guidelines by the Chinese Society of Surgical Infection and Intensive Care and the Chinese College of Gastrointestinal Fistula Surgeons. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:S337-S362. [PMID: 33367581 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The Chinese guidelines for IAI presented here were developed by a panel that included experts from the fields of surgery, critical care, microbiology, infection control, pharmacology, and evidence-based medicine. All questions were structured in population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes format, and evidence profiles were generated. Recommendations were generated following the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system or Best Practice Statement (BPS), when applicable. The final guidelines include 45 graded recommendations and 17 BPSs, including the classification of disease severity, diagnosis, source control, antimicrobial therapy, microbiologic evaluation, nutritional therapy, other supportive therapies, diagnosis and management of specific IAIs, and recognition and management of source control failure. Recommendations on fluid resuscitation and organ support therapy could not be formulated and thus were not included. Accordingly, additional high-quality clinical studies should be performed in the future to address the clinicians' concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuwen Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,BenQ Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Peige Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xueling Fang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yunsong Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianguo Tang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghong Xiao
- Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Minggui Wang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikuan Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bijie Hu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Menghua Dai
- Department of Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaochun Ma
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Huimin Yi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Kang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Daorong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianzhong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Zeqiang Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yuxiu Liu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiangdong Guan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianan Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Faes S, Hübner M, Demartines N, Hahnloser D. Cytokine clearance in serum and peritoneal fluid of patients undergoing damage control surgery with abdominal negative pressure therapy for abdominal sepsis. Pleura Peritoneum 2020. [PMCID: PMC7790174 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Open abdomen technique with negative pressure therapy (NPT) is widely used in patients with severe abdominal sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate cytokine clearance in serum and peritoneal fluid during NPT. Methods This prospective pilot study included six patients with severe abdominal sepsis requiring discontinuity resection and NPT for 48 h followed by planned reoperation. Cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10, TNFalpha, and IL1beta) were measured in the serum and peritoneal fluid during index operation, on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. Results Concentrations of cytokines in peritoneal fluid were higher than in serum. IL10 showed a clearance both in serum (to 16.6%, p=0.019) and peritoneal fluid (to 40.9%, p=0.014). IL6 cleared only in serum (to 24.7%, p=0.001) with persistently high levels in peritoneal fluid. IL8 remained high in both serum and peritoneal fluid. TNFalpha and IL1beta were both low in serum with wide range of high peritoneal concentrations. Only TNFalpha in peritoneal fluid showed significant differences between patients with ischemia vs. perforation (p=0.006). Conclusions The present pilot study suggests that cytokines display distinct patterns of clearance or persistence in the peritoneal fluid and serum over the first 48 h of treatment in severe abdominal sepsis with NPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina Faes
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Dieter Hahnloser
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nagashima F, Inoue S. A Feasible Operative Treatment Strategy for Trauma Patient with Difficulties in Closing the Abdomen during Open Abdomen Management (OAM) Following Damage Control Surgery-Secondary Publication. JOURNAL OF ACUTE CARE SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.17479/jacs.2020.10.3.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
21
|
Gu Y, Wang P, Li H, Tian W, Tang J. Chinese expert consensus on adult ventral abdominal wall defect repair and reconstruction. Am J Surg 2020; 222:86-98. [PMID: 33239177 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of patients with ventral abdominal wall defects, especially complex abdominal wall defects, remains a challenging problem for abdominal wall reconstructive surgeons. Effective surgical treatment requires appropriate preoperative assessment, surgical planning, and correct operative procedure in order to improve postoperative clinical outcomes and minimize complications. Although substantial advances have been made in surgical techniques and prosthetic technologies, there is still insufficient high-level evidence favoring a specific technique. Broad variability in existing practice patterns, including clinical pre-operative evaluation, surgical techniques and surgical procedure selection, are still common. DATA SOURCES With the purpose of providing a best practice algorithm, a comprehensive search was conducted in Medline and PubMed. Sixty-four surgeons considered as experts on abdominal wall defect repair and reconstruction in China were solicited to develop a Chinese consensus and give recommendations to help surgeons standardize their techniques and improve clinical results. CONCLUSIONS This consensus serves as a starting point to provide recommendations for adult ventral abdominal wall repair and reconstruction in China and may help build opportunities for international cooperation to refine AWR practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Gu
- Hernia and Abdominal Wall Disease Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Hernia Surgery, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China
| | - Hangyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Fourth Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110000, China
| | - Wen Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Jianxiong Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Prevention of Fascial Retraction in the Open Abdomen with a Novel Device. Case Rep Surg 2020; 2020:8254804. [PMID: 33145116 PMCID: PMC7599407 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8254804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The open abdomen requires intensive and specific treatment efforts. Long hospital admissions, treatment duration, high mortality rates, deferred and delayed wound closures with alloplastic materials or elaborate closure techniques, and the need for subsequent surgical procedures justify and call for implementation of new therapy options. The case presented here demonstrates the use of a new product (Fasciotens Abdomen) to prevent fascial retraction in the open abdomen of an extubated, conscious patient with four-quadrant peritonitis after perforated appendicitis. Controlled, anteriorly directed fascial traction of 50-60 Newtons prevented fascial retraction during open treatment of the abdomen. Once edema was reduced, abdominal closure was completed without difficulty. This new form of therapy was well tolerated by the patient and led to a markedly more rapid abdominal closure without mesh or abdominal wall reconstruction.
Collapse
|
23
|
Successful management of the open abdomen with hydrocolloid dressing in a resource-constrained setting. Hernia 2020; 25:1519-1527. [PMID: 33009962 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02311-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and detail the management of a difficult, long-term, open abdomen in a resource constraint setting with the use of Hydrocolloid dressing. METHOD An observational retrospective study was conducted at a single level-1 trauma center. Over a 5-year period, all the open abdomen patients were evaluated and the cohorts who were treated with Hydrocolloid dressings were described in detail from their admission to their discharge. RESULTS During this period, there were 147 open abdomens. 7.5% (11) patients required long-term open abdomen management, in which Hydrocolloid dressing was utilized. Of this group, there were no entero/colonic-atmospheric fistulas, and there was either de-novo complete skin coverage, successful skin graft placement, or definitive abdominal wall repair in all the patients. De-novo complete skin coverage took an average of 7.4 months. All the patients were discharged home after an average of 107 days hospitalized. CONCLUSION Despite not being an optimal management of an open abdomen, there are always a small group of these patients who lose abdominal domain, are critically ill or injured, and have prolonged hospitalization with an open abdomen. In this cohort, and especially in resource constraint settings, Hydrocolloid dressing is a cost-efficient, simple, and effective method to treat the 'long-term' open abdomens.
Collapse
|
24
|
Wiseman S, Harvey EM, Bower KL. Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation: A Novel Adjunct to Damage Control Laparotomy. Crit Care Nurse 2020; 39:37-45. [PMID: 31961935 DOI: 10.4037/ccn2019397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Direct peritoneal resuscitation is a validated resuscitation strategy for patients undergoing damage control surgery for hemorrhage, sepsis, or abdominal compartment syndrome with open abdomen and planned reexploration after a period of resuscitation in the intensive care unit. Direct peritoneal resuscitation can decrease visceral edema, normalize body water ratios, accelerate primary abdominal wall closure after damage control surgery, and prevent complications associated with open abdomen. This review article describes the physiological benefits of direct peritoneal resuscitation, how this technique fits within management priorities for the patient in shock, and procedural components in the care of open abdomen surgical patients receiving direct peritoneal resuscitation. Strategies for successful implementation of a novel multidisciplinary intervention in critical care practice are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Wiseman
- Steven Wiseman is a nurse practitioner, Neurological Intensive Care and Intermediate Care Units, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. At the time of this work, he was a clinical nurse and unit preceptor, Neuro-Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Ellen M Harvey
- Ellen M. Harvey is a clinical nurse specialist, Neuro-Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
| | - Katie Love Bower
- Katie Love Bower is an associate professor, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, and associate medical director, emergency general surgery service, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Successful Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Necrosis Caused by a Perforated Ascending Colon Using the ABThera System. Case Rep Surg 2020; 2020:8833566. [PMID: 32774978 PMCID: PMC7391113 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8833566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The practice of leaving the abdomen open after an emergency laparotomy has gained increasing popularity recently. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is known as an effective technique in the management of an open abdomen (OA). A new device, the ABThera™ Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy System (KCI USA, San Antonio, TX, USA), was specifically designed to achieve a temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of an OA. This study was aimed at presenting a successful experience of treating a case of abdominal wall necrosis caused by a perforated ascending colon using the ABThera System. Case Presentation. A 66-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with complaints of severe pain in the abdomen. On admission, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed fluid collection, an air pocket in the subcutaneous fat layer of the abdominal wall, and edematous changes in the adipose tissue in the peritoneum and abdominal wall. Based on a diagnosis of peritonitis resulting from a perforated ascending colon, emergency surgery was performed. A right hemicolectomy, ileostomy construction, and debridement of the necrotic tissues were performed. However, necrotizing fasciitis rapidly spread; therefore, more necrotic tissue was debrided in a second operation. The abdominal wall defect was left open, and the ABThera System was used in the management of the OA; this device promoted wound healing. A reduction was observed in the size of the open wound with visible granulation tissue. The defect was finally covered with a mesh split-thickness skin graft and anterolateral thigh flap. Conclusions In the management of a case of a massive wound with infection, it can be of great benefit to treat the wound with NPWT initially to decrease its size. The ABThera System could facilitate early and safe management of an OA by surgeons.
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang Y, Alnumay A, Paradis T, Beckett A, Fata P, Khwaja K, Razek T, Grushka J, Deckelbaum DL. Management of Open Abdomen After Trauma Laparotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Fascial Traction and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems. World J Surg 2020; 43:3044-3050. [PMID: 31506714 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05166-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of the post-traumatic open abdomen (OA) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone is associated with low rates of primary fascial closure. The abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system exerts dynamic medial fascial traction and may work synergistically with NPWT to facilitate primary fascial closure. METHODS Patients with an OA following trauma laparotomy between 2009 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients treated with ABRA in conjunction with NPWT (ABRA) versus NPWT alone (NPWT) were compared in terms of primary fascial closure rate, number of surgeries to closure, tracheostomy duration, length of stay and incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify predictors of tracheostomy duration. RESULTS We identified 48 patients [ABRA, 12 and NPWT, 36]. The ABRA group was significantly younger (25 vs. 37 years, p = 0.027) and included a lower proportion of males (58% vs. 89%, p = 0.032). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of hollow viscus injury, injury severity score and abdominal abbreviated injury score. Compared to the NPWT group, the ABRA group had a significantly higher rate of primary fascial closure (100% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), fewer surgeries to abdominal closure (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.023) and shorter duration of tracheostomy (15.5 vs. 36 days, p = 0.008). There were no differences in length of stay or incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. On multivariable linear regression, ABRA placement was an independent predictor of shorter tracheostomy duration, after adjusting for covariates (β = - 0.294, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION For the post-traumatic OA, ABRA coupled with NPWT achieves a higher rate of primary fascial closure compared to NPWT alone, while requiring fewer surgeries and a shorter duration of tracheostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Abdulaziz Alnumay
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Tiffany Paradis
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Andrew Beckett
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Paola Fata
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Kosar Khwaja
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Tarek Razek
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Centre for Global Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grushka
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Dan L Deckelbaum
- Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. .,Centre for Global Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Briganti V, Tursini S, Gulia C, Ruggeri G, Gargano T, Lima M. Bogotà bag for pediatric Open Abdomen. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY CASE REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.epsc.2020.101471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
28
|
Granger S, Fallon J, Hopkins J, Pullyblank A. An open and closed case: timing of closure following laparostomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:519-524. [PMID: 32538103 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparostomy is important in the management of patients with intra-abdominal gastrointestinal catastrophe or trauma. It carries significant risk and is resource intensive, both in terms of nursing and surgically. The main goal is to achieve prompt myofascial closure (MFC) in order to minimise morbidity and mortality. Early MFC was initially defined as within 2-3 weeks but there is growing evidence that this should be measured in days. METHODS Retrospective analysis was undertaken of laparostomy cases between 2016 and 2018 at an acute trust and trauma centre serving a population of 500,000. Indication, duration of open abdomen (OA), number of relook procedures and consultant presence were examined to see whether they affected MFC rates, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Overall, 76 laparostomies were performed during the 3-year study period. The most common indication was peritonitis (68.4%). As duration of OA and number of relook procedures increased, the chances of MFC fell significantly. After day 1, MFC rates fell by 20% with each subsequent 24 hours. Leaving the abdomen open primarily at index procedure compared with performing laparostomy following a postoperative complication was associated with significantly higher MFC rates (92.6% vs 68.2%, (p=0.006). The mortality rate was 15.8%. CONCLUSIONS If the OA is not closed within five days or by the third relook procedure, then achieving MFC is unlikely. Alternative methods should be employed to close the abdomen rather than continuing to take the patient back to theatre for relook laparotomies while increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. A proactive strategy to forming primary laparostomy at the index procedure has high closure rates.
Collapse
|
29
|
Müller V, Piper SK, Pratschke J, Raue W. Intraabdominal continuous negative pressure therapy for secondary peritonitis: an observational trial in a maximum care center. Acta Chir Belg 2020; 120:179-185. [PMID: 30947631 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2019.1576448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: Acute secondary peritonitis is afflicted with a high morbidity and mortality. Intensive care therapy, antibiotics and surgical procedures are mandatory. Continuous negative pressure therapy (cNPT) seems to be beneficial but it is unclear which patients will benefit most from this procedures.Methods: We performed a prospective observational trial including all patients that needed to undergo an exploratory laparotomy for the suspicion of acute secondary peritonitis and were treated with cNPT in one year.Results: Thirty nine patients fitted the criteria. Median hospitalization length was 40 days. The vacuum therapy treatment was applied for a median of 4 days. The subgroup analysis between patients, who received the cNPT-dressing for one time (Group A) and patients, in whom the cNPT was continued after first relaparotomy (Group B) showed no differences concerning patients' characteristics. The Mannheimer Peritonitis Index (MPI) during the first operation was significantly correlated with the number of dressing changes (Spearman's rho 0.518, p = .002).Conclusions: Fast acting in acute secondary peritonitis for elimination of the source, abdominal lavage, derivation of the exsudat and interdisciplinary treatment is the treatment of choice. The MPI could be beneficial for the decision process of using cNPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S. K. Piper
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - J. Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - W. Raue
- Clinic of General-, Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, AKH Celle, Celle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zosimas D, Lykoudis PM, Ivanov B, Hepworth C. Laparostomy and temporary abdominal closure outcomes in emergency non-trauma surgery and parameters affecting early definite primary fascial closure. MINERVA CHIR 2020; 75:419-425. [PMID: 32456399 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08320-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The open abdomen or laparostomy is a great advance of surgery based on the concept of damage control surgery. Aim of the study is to review the laparostomy outcomes of non-trauma emergency surgery patients in a district general hospital and identify parameters affecting early definite primary fascial closure. METHODS The records of all non-trauma emergency surgical patients who underwent laparostomy in a three-year period in a single institute were studied retrospectively. Outcomes included length of stay, morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, number of re-look operations, rate of definite primary fascial closure and time to closure. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were included. Morbidity was 84.4% and mortality rates were 21.9% (in-hospital), 18.8% (30-day) and 46.9% (overall). Median length of hospital stay was 22 days. Rate of primary fascial closure was 87.5% and median time to closure was two days. The number of relook operations was the only independent prognostic factor of definite early primary fascial closure, with higher rates of closure in patients with 1-2 relooks. CONCLUSIONS Although the open abdomen has been demonstrated to improve survival, the precise role in abdominal sepsis has not been elucidated. Current consensus does not support use of open abdomen routinely, however in selected situations it becomes unavoidable. Laparostomy is a valid option in non-trauma emergency surgery and can be managed safely in a district hospital. High closure rates can be achieved if one or two re-look operations are performed with an early attempt for closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Zosimas
- Department of General Surgery, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Romford, UK -
| | - Panagis M Lykoudis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Bogdan Ivanov
- Department of General Surgery, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Romford, UK
| | - Clive Hepworth
- Department of General Surgery, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Romford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: Management of the open abdomen after damage control surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 87:1232-1238. [PMID: 31205219 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
32
|
Diaconescu B, Uranues S, Fingerhut A, Vartic M, Zago M, Kurihara H, Latifi R, Popa D, Leppäniemi A, Tilsed J, Bratu M, Beuran M. The Bucharest ESTES consensus statement on peritonitis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 46:1005-1023. [PMID: 32303796 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01338-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritonitis is still an important health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with peritonitis may be an important factor to reduce the risks for patients and improve efficiency, outcome, and the cost of care. METHODS Expert panel discussion on Peritonitis was held in Bucharest on May 2017, during the 17th ECTES Congress, involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, radiologists and intensivists with the goal of defining recommendations for the optimal management of peritonitis. CONCLUSION This document is an updated presentation of management of peritonitis and represents the summary of the final recommendations approved by a panel of experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Diaconescu
- Anatomy Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Selman Uranues
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China
| | - Mihaela Vartic
- Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Clinic Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mauro Zago
- General and Emergency Surgery Division, Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital Head, Milan, Italy
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Dorin Popa
- Surgery Department, University Hospital Linkoping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jonathan Tilsed
- Honorary Senior Lecturer Hull York Medical School, Chairman UEMS Division of Emergency Surgery, Heslington, UK
| | - Matei Bratu
- Anatomy Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mircea Beuran
- Surgery Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Phamacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
de Vries FEE, Claessen JJM, Atema JJ, van Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Immediate Closure of Abdominal Cavity with Biologic Mesh versus Temporary Abdominal Closure of Open Abdomen in Non-Trauma Emergency Patients (CLOSE-UP Study). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020; 21:694-703. [PMID: 32097095 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2019.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In more than 10% of emergency laparotomies in non-trauma patients, primary fascial closure is not achievable because of excessive visceral edema, which leaves the patient with an open abdomen (OA). An OA harbors an inherent high risk of serious complications, and temporary closure devices are used to achieve delayed fascial closure. A potential new strategy in preventing OA is immediate closure during the emergency procedure with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. Methods: This is a prospective comparative cohort feasibility study in 13 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Non-trauma patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in which regular sutured primary fascial closure was not achievable because of excessive intra-abdominal edema were eligible. In one cohort, Biomesh (n = 20), the abdominal cavity was immediately closed at the emergency laparotomy with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. In a parallel cohort, Control (n = 20), the resulting OA was managed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC; inlay polyglactin [Vicryl™] mesh [n = 7]) or commercial (ABTheraTM) abdominal negative pressure therapy device (n = 13)). The primary end point was the proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days. Results: At 90 days, 65% (13/20) of the abdominal cavities were closed in the Biomesh cohort versus 45% (9/20) in Controls (p = 0.204). In the Biomesh cohort, seven of 20 (35%) patients had at least one major complication versus 15 of 20 (75%) patients in the Control cohort (p = 0.011). Both the median number of intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation days were significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort; one versus 10 (p = 0.002) and 0 versus four (p = 0.003) days, respectively. The number of abdominal reoperations was significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort (median 0 vs. two, p < 0.001; total number five vs. 44). Conclusions: If primary fascial closure cannot be achieved at the emergency laparotomy in non-trauma patients, immediate abdominal closure by use of a non-crosslinked biologic mesh prevents OA management. This results in a non-significant higher proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days compared with OA management with TAC techniques, and in a significant reduction of major complications and reoperations, and a shorter ICU stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur E E de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Atema
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Damage-control surgery (abdominopelvic packing followed by a period of medical stabilization in the intensive care unit) is a life-saving intervention usually reserved for critically injured patients who may not survive an attempt to achieve hemostasis and complete repair of the damage in the operating room. Most obstetricians have little or no experience in this area, although the use of damage-control surgery in selected cases may be life-saving. This approach should be considered when arterial bleeding has been controlled and persistent bleeding is deemed to be secondary to coagulopathy that is refractory to blood product replacement, particularly in the presence of hypothermia, acidosis, and vasopressor requirement. A prototypical (albeit hypothetical) case is described here in which damage-control surgery is indicated.
Collapse
|
35
|
Karhof S, Haverkort M, Simmermacher R, Hietbrink F, Leenen L, van Wessem K. Underlying disease determines the risk of an open abdomen treatment, final closure, however, is determined by the surgical abdominal history. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 47:113-120. [PMID: 31451863 PMCID: PMC7851030 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01205-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Temporary abdominal closure is frequently used in several situations such as abbreviated surgery in damage control situations or when closing is impossible due to organ distention or increased abdominal pressure. The ultimate goal is to eventually close the fascia; however, little is known about factors predicting abdominal closure. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with the need for open abdomen as well as indicating the possibility of delayed fascial closure after a period of open abdominal treatment. METHODS A retrospective review of all patients that underwent midline laparotomy between January 2008 and December 2012 was performed. Both factors predicting open abdominal treatment and possibility to close the fascia afterwards were identified and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS 775 laparotomies in 525 patients (60% male) were included. 109 patients (21%) had an open abdomen with a mortality rate of 27%. Male gender and acidosis were associated with open abdominal treatment. In 54%, the open abdomen could be closed by delayed fascial closure. The number of laparotomies both before and during temporary abdominal treatment was associated with failure of closure. CONCLUSION In this study, male sex and physiological derangement, reflected by acidosis, were independent predictors of open abdominal treatment. Furthermore, the success of delayed fascial closure depends on number of abdominal surgical procedures. Moreover, based on our experiences, we suggest to change modalities early on, to prevent multiple fruitless attempts to close the abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Karhof
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Haverkort
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Simmermacher
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn van Wessem
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias: WSES guidelines. Hernia 2019; 24:359-368. [PMID: 31407109 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02021-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In July 2013, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held the first Consensus Conference on emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias in adult patients with the intention of producing evidence-based guidelines to assist surgeons in the management of complicated abdominal wall hernias. Guidelines were updated in 2017 in keeping with varying clinical practice: benefits resulting from the increased use of biological prosthesis in the emergency setting were highlighted, as previously published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery. This executive summary is intended to consolidate knowledge on the emergency management of complicated hernias by providing the broad readership with a practical and concise version of the original guidelines. METHODS This executive manuscript summarizes the WSES guidelines reporting on the emergency management of complicated abdominal wall hernias; statements are highlighted focusing the readers' attention on the main concepts presented in the original guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Emergency repair of complicated abdominal hernias remains one of the most common and challenging surgical emergencies worldwide. WSES aims to provide an essential version of the evidence-based guidelines focusing on the timing of intervention, laparoscopic approach, surgical repair following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) wound classification, antimicrobial prophylaxis and anesthesia in the emergency setting.
Collapse
|
37
|
Doig CJ, Page SA, McKee JL, Moore EE, Abu-Zidan FM, Carroll R, Marshall JC, Faris PD, Tolonen M, Catena F, Cocolini F, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L, Minor SF, Peirera BM, Diaz JJ, Kirkpatrick AW. Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis. World J Emerg Surg 2019; 14:39. [PMID: 31404221 PMCID: PMC6683332 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0259-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has high mortality, thought due in part to progressive bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Treatment includes early antibiotics and operative source control. At surgery, open abdomen management with negative-peritoneal-pressure therapy (NPPT) has been hypothesized to mitigate MOF and death, although clinical equipoise for this operative approach exists. The Closed or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095) will prospectively randomize eligible patients intra-operatively to formal abdominal closure or OA with NPTT. We review the ethical basis for conducting research in SCIAS. Main body Research in critically ill incapacitated patients is important to advance care. Conducting research among SCIAS is complicated due to the severity of illness including delirium, need for emergent interventions, diagnostic criteria confirmed only at laparotomy, and obtundation from anaesthesia. In other circumstances involving critically ill patients, clinical experts have worked closely with ethicists to apply principles that balance the rights of patients whilst simultaneously permitting inclusion in research. In Canada, the Tri-Council Policy Statement-2 (TCPS-2) describes six criteria that permit study enrollment and randomization in such situations: (a) serious threat to the prospective participant requires immediate intervention; (b) either no standard efficacious care exists or the research offers realistic possibility of direct benefit; (c) risks are not greater than that involved in standard care or are clearly justified by prospect for direct benefits; (d) prospective participant is unconscious or lacks capacity to understand the complexities of the research; (e) third-party authorization cannot be secured in sufficient time; and (f) no relevant prior directives are known to exist that preclude participation. TCPS-2 criteria are in principle not dissimilar to other (inter)national criteria. The COOL study will use waiver of consent to initiate enrollment and randomization, followed by surrogate or proxy consent, and finally delayed informed consent in subjects that survive and regain capacity. Conclusions A delayed consent mechanism is a practical and ethical solution to challenges in research in SCIAS. The ultimate goal of consent is to balance respect for patient participants and to permit participation in new trials with a reasonable opportunity for improved outcome and minimal risk of harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Doig
- 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,2Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Stacey A Page
- 2Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jessica L McKee
- 3Regional Trauma Services, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- 7Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Rosemary Carroll
- 8Surgical Services John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - John C Marshall
- 6Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter D Faris
- 5Research Facilitation Analytics (DIMR), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada
| | - Matti Tolonen
- 9Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fausto Catena
- 10Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Federico Cocolini
- 11General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery dept, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- 13Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital of Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | - Sam F Minor
- 14Department of Critical Care and Department of Surgery, NSHA- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9 Canada
| | - Bruno M Peirera
- 15Division of Trauma Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Jose J Diaz
- 16Department of Surgery, Acute Care Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School on Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- 17Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.,18Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.,19EG23 Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2 T9 Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tian W, Huang Q, Yao Z, Huang M, Yang F, Zhao Y, Li J. A preliminary prospective study of patients who underwent vacuum-assisted and mesh-mediated fascial traction techniques for open abdomen management with negative fluid therapy: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16617. [PMID: 31464898 PMCID: PMC6736416 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
It is unclear whether strategies targeting negative fluid balance are associated with facilitated early fascial closure. The present study investigated the effects of fluid removal therapy on early facial closure of open abdomen patients.A prospective study was conducted in patients who underwent open abdomen management with vacuum-assisted and mesh-mediated fascial traction technique. Therapeutic diuresis with torasemide was applied to cause negative fluid balance in the treatment group. The study and follow-up periods were 7 and 180 days, respectively. The observational indices included the intra-abdominal pressure, the number of days to closure, the type of closure, the septic complications, the duration of ventilation support, the duration of initial hospital stay, and the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.A total of 27 patients were divided into the treatment (16 patients) and control (11 patients) groups. The median intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) of the patients of the control and the treatment groups was significantly lower at day 7 compared with the baseline value (P < .0001). IAP was lower in the treatment group compared with that noted in the control group, following day 4 of the fluid removal therapy (P < .05). The percentage weight loss in the treatment group was between 4.80% and 10.88%. The early closure rates were significantly higher in the treatment group compared with those in the control group (75.0% vs 18.2%, P = .0063).Fluid removal therapy combined with vacuum-assisted and mesh-mediated fascial traction provided a high early fascial closure rate for open abdomen patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiliang Tian
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Qian Huang
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng Yao
- Department of Surgery, Jiangning Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming Huang
- Department of Surgery, Jiangning Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yunzhao Zhao
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jieshou Li
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Popivanov G, Kjossev K, Mutafchiyski V. The open abdomen - still a challenge for the surgeons. Which is the best technique for temporary abdominal closure? A focus on negative pressure wound therapy. G Chir 2019; 38:267-272. [PMID: 29442056 DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.6.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
40
|
Eickhoff R, Guschlbauer M, Maul AC, Klink CD, Neumann UP, Engel M, Hellmich M, Sterner-Kock A, Krieglstein CF. A new device to prevent fascial retraction in the open abdomen - proof of concept in vivo. BMC Surg 2019; 19:82. [PMID: 31286901 PMCID: PMC6615246 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0543-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An open abdomen is often necessary for survival of patients after peritonitis, compartment syndrome, or in damage control surgery. However, abdominal wall retraction relieves delays and complicates abdominal wall closure. The principle of the newly fascia preserving device (FPD) is the application of anteriorly directed traction on both fascial edges over an external support through a longitudinal beam to relieve increased abdominal pressure and prevent fascial retraction. Methods Twelve pigs were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups underwent midline laparotomy under general anesthesia. Group one was treated with the new device, group two served as controls. The tension for closing the abdominal fascia was measured immediately after laparotomy as well as at 24 and 48 h. Vital parameters and ventilation pressure were recorded. Post mortem, all fascial tissues were histologically examined. Results All pigs demonstrated increases in abdominal circumference. In both groups, forces for closing the abdomen increased over the observation period. Concerning the central closing force after 24 h we saw a significant lower force in the FPD group (14.4 ± 3 N) vs. control group (21.6 ± 5.7 N, p < 0.001). By testing the main effects using an ANOVA analysis we found a significant group related effect concerning closing force and abdominal circumference of the FDP-group vs. control group (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The placement of the device on chest and pelvis did not influence vital parameters and ventilation pressure. Histologic exam detected no tissue damage. Conclusions This trial shows the feasibility to prevent fascial retraction during the open abdomen by using the new device. Thus, it is expected that an earlier closure of the abdominal wall will be possible, and a higher rate of primary closure will be attained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Eickhoff
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Maria Guschlbauer
- Center for Experimental Medicine, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Building No. 51A, 50931, Cologne, Germany.,Decentral Animal Facility, University Hospital of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexandra C Maul
- Center for Experimental Medicine, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Building No. 51A, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian D Klink
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Engel
- Department of Surgery, Marienhospital Brühl GmbH, Mühlenstraße, 21-25 50321, Brühl, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- IMSB, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Sterner-Kock
- Center for Experimental Medicine, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Building No. 51A, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A, Segovia-Lohse H, Gamberini E, Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Parry N, Sartelli M, Wolbrink D, van Goor H, Baiocchi G, Ansaloni L, Biffl W, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Kluger Y, Moore E, Catena F. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg 2019; 14:27. [PMID: 31210778 PMCID: PMC6567462 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 317] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Although most patients with acute pancreatitis have the mild form of the disease, about 20-30% develops a severe form, often associated with single or multiple organ dysfunction requiring intensive care. Identifying the severe form early is one of the major challenges in managing severe acute pancreatitis. Infection of the pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis occurs in about 20-40% of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with worsening organ dysfunctions. While most patients with sterile necrosis can be managed nonoperatively, patients with infected necrosis usually require an intervention that can be percutaneous, endoscopic, or open surgical. These guidelines present evidence-based international consensus statements on the management of severe acute pancreatitis from collaboration of a panel of experts meeting during the World Congress of Emergency Surgery in June 27-30, 2018 in Bertinoro, Italy. The main topics of these guidelines fall under the following topics: Diagnosis, Antibiotic treatment, Management in the Intensive Care Unit, Surgical and operative management, and Open abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital Meilahti, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00029 Helsinki,, Finland
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital Meilahti, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00029 Helsinki,, Finland
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Emiliano Gamberini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Chad G. Ball
- Foothills Medical Centre & the University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Neil Parry
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON Canada
| | | | - Daan Wolbrink
- Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- Surgical Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ernest Moore
- Trauma Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Novel method for delayed primary closure and incisional hernia prevention in open abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal wall closure (COMODA). Hernia 2019; 24:395-401. [PMID: 30968285 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01948-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intended open abdomen is an option in cases of trauma and non-trauma patients. Nevertheless, after primary closure, incisional hernia rate is high. We describe a novel method, called COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal closure (COMODA), a delayed primary closure which prevents incisional hernia. METHODS A negative pressure wound therapy system is combined with a condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) mesh. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN72678033. RESULTS Ten male patients with a median age of 68.8 (43-87) years were included. Primary closure rate was 100% per protocol. The median number of procedures per patient was 5.7 (5-9). Primary closure was obtained in 20.8 (10-32) days and median hospital stay was 36.3 (18-52) days. Only one patient developed incisional hernia during a median follow-up of 27 (8-60) months. CONCLUSION COMODA method allows for a high rate of delayed primary closure. It is safe and decreases the risk for developing an incisional hernia. However, a large number of patients are needed to support this conclusion.
Collapse
|
43
|
The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.29413/abs.2019-4.1.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background. Laparostomy (open abdomen) is an aggressive surgical treatment of peritonitis and it requires justification of its effectiveness. Aims. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned rehabilitation in patients with common purulent peritonitis.Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of the results of laparostomy and planned sanations in patients with common purulent peritonitis. The study included 101 case histories. Inclusion criteria: generalized purulent peritonitis established in the primary surgical intervention that required the implementation of laparotomy. The excluded from the study were immunocompromised patients, hemodialysis patients, patients with pancreatic necrosis, closed abdominal trauma, class C liver cirrhosis, carcinomatosis, cancer cachexia, disseminated tuberculosis, total mesenteric thrombosis. In statistic processing we used indicators of median and inter quartile ranges, methods of nonparametric statistics (Mann – Whitney criterion). The level of significance was α = 0.05.Results. The whole group is divided into three subgroups according to MPI: subgroup I – 20 people, subgroup II – 57, subgroup III – 24. The method of planned sanation of the abdominal cavity in combination with laparostomy was applied in 34 cases (33.6 %). In the first subgroup in two cases (10 %), in the second – in 18 (31.6 %), in the third – 14 (58.3 %). The deceased, regardless of the chosen surgical technique, were characterized by higher values of integral scales. The severity of the condition of the surviving patients in which the technique was used at the time of admission was significantly higher than the severity of the surviving patients, in which laparostomy SAPS II was not used (p = 0.4716). However, their age was significantly older (p = 0.5476). The deceased patients were older 60 years with high rates on the above mentioned integrated scales.Conclusions. The results showed that patients older than 60 years, II & III on MPI and with high values of integral scales require more balanced and differential approach when using laparostomy (open abdomen).
Collapse
|
44
|
Li Y, Li PY, Sun SJ, Yao YZ, Li ZF, Liu T, Yang F, Zhang LY, Bai XJ, Huo JS, He WB, Ouyang J, Peng L, Hu P, Zhu YA, Jin P, Shao QF, Wang YF, Dai RW, Hu PY, Chen HM, Wang GF, Wang YG, Jin HX, Zhu CJ, Zhang QY, Shao B, Sang XG, Yin CL. Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association for management guidelines of vacuum sealing drainage application in abdominal surgeries-Update and systematic review. Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22:1-11. [PMID: 30850324 PMCID: PMC6529401 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) is frequently used in abdominal surgeries. However, relevant guidelines are rare. Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association organized a committee composed of 28 experts across China in July 2017, aiming to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the application of VSD in abdominal surgeries. Eleven questions regarding the use of VSD in abdominal surgeries were addressed: (1) which type of materials should be respectively chosen for the intraperitoneal cavity, retroperitoneal cavity and superficial incisions? (2) Can VSD be preventively used for a high-risk abdominal incision with primary suture? (3) Can VSD be used in severely contaminated/infected abdominal surgical sites? (4) Can VSD be used for temporary abdominal cavity closure under some special conditions such as severe abdominal trauma, infection, liver transplantation and intra-abdominal volume increment in abdominal compartment syndrome? (5) Can VSD be used in abdominal organ inflammation, injury, or postoperative drainage? (6) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intestinal fistula and pancreatic fistula? (7) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intra-abdominal and extra-peritoneal abscess? (8) Can VSD be used in the treatment of abdominal wall wounds, wound cavity, and defects? (9) Does VSD increase the risk of bleeding? (10) Does VSD increase the risk of intestinal wall injury? (11) Does VSD increase the risk of peritoneal adhesion? Focusing on these questions, evidence-based recommendations were given accordingly. VSD was strongly recommended regarding the questions 2-4. Weak recommendations were made regarding questions 1 and 5-11. Proper use of VSD in abdominal surgeries can lower the risk of infection in abdominal incisions with primary suture, treat severely contaminated/infected surgical sites and facilitate temporary abdominal cavity closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Pei-Yuan Li
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shi-Jing Sun
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuan-Zhang Yao
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhan-Fei Li
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lian-Yang Zhang
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China,Corresponding author.
| | - Xiang-Jun Bai
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China,Corresponding author.
| | - Jing-Shan Huo
- Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangzhou Province, China
| | - Wu-Bing He
- Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Ouyang
- Emergency Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Lei Peng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Ping Hu
- Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China
| | - Yan-An Zhu
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ping Jin
- Yuyao People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Yuyao, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi-Feng Shao
- Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | | | - Rui-Wu Dai
- Chengdu Military General Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Pei-Yang Hu
- Tiantai County People's Hospital, Tiantai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hai-Ming Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Ge-Fei Wang
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yong-Gao Wang
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong-Xu Jin
- Shenyang Military General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Chang-Ju Zhu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yong Zhang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Biao Shao
- The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | | | - Chang-Lin Yin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ladha P, Callander M, Sifri ZC. What's new in critical illness and injury science? Management of the open abdomen: Getting it together! Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2019; 9:51-53. [PMID: 31334044 PMCID: PMC6625327 DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.261467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Prerna Ladha
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| | - Michael Callander
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| | - Ziad C Sifri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Does Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for the Open Abdomen Benefit the Patient? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2018; 30:256-261. [PMID: 28520603 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000516196.19330.6f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is the most modern and sophisticated method of temporary abdominal closure. The aim of the study was to determine the significant predictors for mortality in patients with NPWT. SETTING University Clinical Centre Maribor, Slovenia MATERIALS AND METHODS:: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated with NPWT between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014. RESULTS In the univariate analysis, the type of wound closure, more than 7 NPWT changes, the total days with NPWT, and time to wound closure were significantly associated with death of the patient. In the multivariate analysis, only the number of more than 7 NPWT changes was found as a significant predictor for death (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS Negative-pressure wound therapy is a method of choice for the treatment of open abdomen if there is a clear indication. However, clinicians should try all measures to remove the NPWT system and close the abdomen as soon as possible because prolonged use is associated with significantly higher mortality.
Collapse
|
47
|
Salamone G, Licari L, Guercio G, Comelli A, Mangiapane M, Falco N, Tutino R, Bagarella N, Campanella S, Porrello C, Gullo R, Cocorullo G, Gulotta G. Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study. World J Surg 2018; 42:1679-1686. [PMID: 29147897 PMCID: PMC5934457 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4354-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Open abdomen (OA) permits the application of damage control surgery principles when abdominal trauma, sepsis, severe acute peritonitis and abdominal compartmental syndrome (ACS) occur. Methods Non-traumatic patients treated with OA between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified in a prospective database, and the data collected were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ records were collected from charts and the surgical and intensive care unit (ICU) registries. The Acosta “modified” technique was used to achieve fascial closure in vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) patients. Sex, age, simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), abdominal compartmental syndrome (ACS), cardiovascular disease (CVD) and surgical technique performed were evaluated in a multivariate analysis for mortality and fascial closure prediction. Results Ninety-six patients with a median age of 69 (40–78) years were included in the study. Sixty-nine patients (72%) underwent VAWCM. Forty-one patients (68%) achieved primary fascia closure: two patients (5%) were treated with VAWC (37 median days) versus 39 patients (95%) who were treated with VAWCM (10 median days) (p = 0.0003). Forty-eight patients underwent OA treatment due to ACS, and 24 patients (50%) survived compared to 36 patients (75%) from the “other reasons” group (p = 0.01). The ACS group required longer mechanical ventilator support (p = 0.006), length of stay in hospital (p = 0.005) and in ICU (p = 0.04) and had higher SAPS II scores (p = 0.0002). Conclusions The survival rate was 62%. ACS (p = 0.01), SAPS II (p = 0.004), sex (p = 0.01), pre-existing CVD (p = 0.0007) and surgical technique (VAWC vs VAWCM) (p = 0.0009) were determined to be predictors of mortality. Primary fascial closure was obtained in 68% of cases. VAWCM was found to grant higher survival and primary fascial closure rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Salamone
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Leo Licari
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Guercio
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Albert Comelli
- Department of Industrial and Digital Innovation, Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirko Mangiapane
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nicolò Falco
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Tutino
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Noemi Bagarella
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Sofia Campanella
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Calogero Porrello
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberto Gullo
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Cocorullo
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gaspare Gulotta
- General and Emergency Surgery - Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffré 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Piccoli M, Agresta F, Attinà GM, Amabile D, Marchi D. "Complex abdominal wall" management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference. Updates Surg 2018; 71:255-272. [PMID: 30255435 PMCID: PMC6647889 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0577-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To date, there is no shared consensus on a definition of a complex abdominal wall in elective surgery and in the emergency, on indications, technical details, complications, and follow-up. The purpose of the conference was to lay the foundations for a homogeneous approach to the complex abdominal wall with the primary intent being to attain the following objectives: (1) to develop evidence-based recommendations to define “complex abdominal wall”; (2) indications in emergency and in elective cases; (3) management of “complex abdominal wall”; (4) techniques for temporary abdominal closure. The decompressive laparostomy should be considered in a case of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with critical conditions or after the failure of a medical treatment or less invasive methods. In the second one, beyond different mechanism, patients with surgical emergency diseases might reach the same pathophysiological end point of trauma patients where a preventive “open abdomen” might be indicated (a temporary abdominal closure: in the case of a non-infected field, the Wittmann patch and the NPWT had the best outcome followed by meshes; in the case of an infected field, NPWT techniques seem to be the preferred). The second priority is to create optimal both general as local conditions for healing: the right antimicrobial management, feeding—preferably by the enteral route—and managing correctly the open abdomen wall. The use of a mesh appears to be—if and when possible—the gold standard. There is a lot of enthusiasm about biological meshes. But the actual evidence supports their use only in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields but above all, to reduce the higher rate of recurrences, the wall anatomy and function should be restored in the midline, with or without component separation technique. On the other site has not to be neglected that the use of monofilament and macroporous non-absorbable meshes, in extraperitoneal position, in the setting of the complex abdomen with contamination, seems to have a cost effective role too. The idea of this consensus conference was mainly to try to bring order in the so copious, but not always so “evident” literature utilizing and exchanging the expertise of different specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Piccoli
- Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Unit, New Sant'Agostino Hospital, Via Pietro Giardini, 1355, 41126, Modena, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS19 Veneto, Piazzale degli Etruschi 9, 45011, Adria, Italy
| | - Grazia Maria Attinà
- Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152, Rome, Italy.
| | - Dalia Amabile
- Department of General Surgery, General Surgery 1, Saint Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie D'oro, 9, 38122, Trento, Italy
| | - Domenico Marchi
- Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Unit, New Sant'Agostino Hospital, Via Pietro Giardini, 1355, 41126, Modena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The open abdomen technique and temporary abdominal closure after damage control surgery is fast becoming the standard of care for managing intra-abdominal bleeding and infectious or ischemic processes in critically ill patients. Expansion of this technique has evolved from damage control surgery in severely injured trauma patients to use in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome due to acute pancreatitis and other disorders. Subsequent therapies after use of the open abdomen technique and temporary abdominal closure are resuscitation in the intensive care unit and planned reoperation to manage the underlying cause of bleeding, infection, or ischemia. Determining the need for this potentially lifesaving intervention and managing the wound after the open abdomen has been created are all within the realm of critical care nurses. Case studies illustrate the implementation of the open abdomen technique and patient management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor R Fitzpatrick
- Eleanor R. Fitzpatrick is a clinical nurse specialist for surgical critical care at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hu P, Uhlich R, Gleason F, Kerby J, Bosarge P. Impact of initial temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery: a retrospective analysis. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:43. [PMID: 30237824 PMCID: PMC6139137 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0204-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Damage control surgery has revolutionized trauma surgery. Use of damage control surgery allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy at the risk of loss of abdominal domain and intra-abdominal complications. Temporary abdominal closure is possible with multiple techniques, the choice of which may affect ability to achieve primary fascial closure and further complication. Methods A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy upon admission to an ACS-verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was ability to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization. Results Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria for inclusion. Primary skin closure (57.7%), ABThera™ VAC system (ABT) (15.1%), Bogota bag (BB) (25.1%), or a modified Barker's vacuum-packing (BVP) (2.1%) were used in the initial laparotomy. Patients receiving skin-only closure had significantly higher rates of primary fascial closure and lower hospital mortality, but also significantly lower mean lactate, base deficit, and requirement for massive transfusion. Between ABT or BB, use of ABT was associated with increased rates of fascial closure. Multivariate regression revealed primary skin closure to be significantly associated with primary fascial closure while BB was associated with failure to achieve fascial closure. Conclusions Primary skin closure is a viable option in the initial management of the open abdomen, although these patients demonstrated less injury burden in our study. Use of vacuum-assisted dressings continues to be the preferred method for temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery for trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parker Hu
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 701 19th Street South, 112 Lyons-Harrison Research Building, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| | - Rindi Uhlich
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Frank Gleason
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Jeffrey Kerby
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Patrick Bosarge
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| |
Collapse
|