Utilization and impact of repeat biopsy for follicular lesion/atypia of undetermined significance

Use of molecular testing results to analyze the overuse of atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology

INTRODUCTION

The suggested atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) rate for thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies is 10% or less. Prompted by a high institutional AUS rate, we examined using molecular testing results (MTR) as a potential quality metric tool to reduce the AUS rate. We correlated MTR with AUS cytologic findings, surgical pathology follow-up, and individual pathologist AUS rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic data, cytologic diagnoses, MTR, and surgical pathology diagnoses were retrospectively obtained. MTR were classified as either positive or negative. AUS rates and MTR proportions were compared among pathologists. The cytomorphologic features of 143 AUS cases were assessed and correlated with MTR.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2022, 710 of 3247 thyroid fine-needle aspirations were classified as AUS, with a yearly average rate of 22% (range = 19%-26%). AUS cases included: 331 (47%) with architectural atypia; 204 (29%) with oncocytic (Hürthle cell) atypia; 99 (14%) with combined architectural and cytologic atypia; and 76 (10%) with isolated cytologic atypia. Most AUS cases with molecular testing had negative MTR (360/492, 73%). AUS with cytologic atypia had higher positive MTR risk (logarithm of odds ratio = 1.27, 95% credible interval [0.5-2.04], P = 0.001). The average positive MTR rate by pathologist was 21.5% (range 0%-35%); higher positive MTR rates had better correlation with subsequent neoplastic/malignant histologic diagnoses. The MTR sensitivity for malignant disease was 89% and the negative predictive value was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

MTR analysis reveals the importance of cytologic atypia as a determinant of malignancy risk in AUS cases. Periodic analysis of MTR data alongside individual pathologist AUS rates can help refine diagnostic criteria and potentially reduce AUS overuse.

Effective Use of microRNA, BRAF and Sonographic Risk Assessment in Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules Requires a Different Approach to Nodules with Features of Nuclear Atypia and Other Types of Atypia

The aim of the study was to analyze the diagnostic usefulness of the combined assessment of the ultrasound risk category of the nodule (evaluated with EU-TIRADS system), the presence of BRAF V600E mutation and the expression of selected microRNAs (miR-146b, miR-221 and miR-222) in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules, separately for cases with nuclear atypia (AUS-nuclear) and cases with other types of atypia (AUS-other). We evaluated 161 nodules (66 AUS-nuclear and 95 AUS-other) with known results of postoperative histopathological examination. The rate of cancer and the rate of PTC among cancers were nearly three times higher in the AUS-nuclear than the AUS-other group. For AUS-nuclear nodules, the most effective diagnostic panel included, in addition to repeat FNA, the assessment of BRAF V600E mutation and the expression of miR-146b and miR-222 (sensitivity: 93.5%, specificity: 80.0%). For AUS-other nodules, a two-step procedure was most effective: at the first stage, forgoing surgical treatment in subjects with a benign repeat FNA outcome, and, at the second stage, the assessment of miR-222 expression and the EU-TIRADS category (sensitivity: 92.3%, specificity: 76.8%). The optimal use of molecular methods in the diagnostics of category III thyroid nodules requires a separate approach for nodules with nuclear atypia and nodules with other types of atypia.

Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration With Molecular Analysis in Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical outcomes in a series of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) with repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and results of genomic classifier.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

We reviewed FNA samples from subjects with Bethesda III or IV diagnoses from January 2015 to December 2018 at a single institution and selected those with repeat FNA and ThyroSeq testing of the same nodule. Patient demographics, Bethesda classifications, ThyroSeq results, treatment detail, and surgical pathology, when available, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with cytologic diagnosis of ITN, repeat FNA, and ThyroSeq testing were identified. Following repeat FNA, 55 nodules (57%) remained ITN; 40 (42%) were reclassified as benign; and 1 (1%) was reclassified as suspicious for malignancy. In 31 patients with ThyroSeq analysis accompanying initial and repeat FNA, 26 (84%) had the same result on each, while 5 (16%) tested ThyroSeq positive following an initially negative result (κ = 0.24). Most nodules that were downgraded to Bethesda II on repeat FNA (37/40, 93%) were managed nonsurgically. Patients with ThyroSeq-positive results were treated with surgery more often (25/28, 89%) than patients with ThyroSeq-negative results (11/68, 16%; P < .0001). In excised nodules, the prevalence of malignancy and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features was 28% (n = 10) and 22% (n = 8), respectively, and all malignancies were low risk.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, repeat FNA helped patients with ITNs avoid diagnostic surgery through reclassification to benign cytology. The risk of high-risk malignancy in ThyroSeq-positive nodules with repeat indeterminate cytology was low.

The national rate of malignancy among Bethesda III, IV, and V thyroid nodules is higher than expected: A NSQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was formalized in 2007 to stratify cytologic specimens based on their risk of malignancy. Several studies have reported significant variations between their institutional rate of malignancy compared to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. The objective of this study was to determine the national rate of malignancy for Bethesda III, Bethesda IV, and Bethesda V thyroid nodules.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2019, patients with preoperative thyroid cytopathology and pathology results in National Surgical Quality Improvement database were included. The rate of malignancy was compared to the median the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology 2017, and risk factors associated with malignancy were identified for Bethesda III, Bethesda IV, and Bethesda V specimens.

RESULTS

In total, 13,121 patients with preoperative cytopathology and postresection pathology were identified. The national rate of malignancy was significantly higher than the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology 2017 for Bethesda III (36.2% vs 12.0%, P < .01), Bethesda IV (36.7% vs 25.0%, P < .01), and Bethesda V (91.1% vs 52.5%, P < .01) specimens. Male sex was significantly associated with malignancy in Bethesda III, Bethesda IV, and Bethesda V nodules (Bethesda III, odds ratio: 1.20, [1.01-1.42]; Bethesda IV, odds ratio: 1.47, [1.27-1.71]; Bethesda V, odds ratio: 1.28, [1.03-1.58]). Younger age was associated with malignancy in Bethesda III patients under 55 (odds ratio: 1.23, [1.06-1.42]), Bethesda IV patients under 42 (odds ratio: 1.23, [1.06-1.43]), and Bethesda V patients aged less than 47 (odds ratio: 1.38, [1.15-1.67]).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort study to describe the national rate of malignancy for Bethesda III, IV, and V specimens in the United States. These results reveal the national rate of malignancy is higher than the implied rate of malignancy reported to patients based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. We recommend counseling patients regarding this increased rate of malignancy to set appropriate expectations after surgical intervention.

Optimization of the Management of Category III Thyroid Nodules Using Repeat FNA and TIRADS

The aim of the study was to examine the benefits of the joint use of repeat FNA (rFNA) and EU-TIRADS in category III nodules in relation to the kind of atypia: nuclear vs. architectural (denoted by AUS and FLUS respectively). The study included 127 AUS and 1739 FLUS nodules with a known category of EU-TIRADS. Repeat FNA was performed in 82 AUS and 934 FLUS nodules of which 57 and 515 were excised, respectively. AUS nodules had higher malignancy risk than FLUS nodules. EU-TIRADS showed higher accuracy for AUS nodules, the opposite to rFNA, that had higher accuracy for FLUS nodules. The combined criterion for AUS nodules (at least rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-4) maximized sensitivity (92.3%) with acceptable specificity (70.0%); OR: 28.0. In the case of FLUS nodules, the combined criterion (rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-5) maximized specificity (95.2%) with 57.7% sensitivity and a low percentage (13.9%) of positive nodules, OR: 27.0. In both types of nodules, the low risk category in EU-TIRADS and benign result of rFNA excluded cancer. Concluding, category III nodules with and without nuclear atypia differ in their risk of malignancy and, consequently, diagnostic criteria adopted for the evaluation of these nodules with rFNA and EU-TIRADS should be specific to AUS and FLUS nodules.

Molecular Testing for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Association of Negative Predictive Value With Nodule Size

BACKGROUND

Molecular testing helps stratify risk of malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules, but it may be limited in its ability to rule out malignancy in large nodules.

METHODS

We compared small thyroid nodules (<4 cm) to large thyroid nodules (4 cm or greater) in a retrospective, single center, cohort study of indeterminate thyroid nodules analyzed with ThyroSeq from 10/2015 through 4/2020. Our primary outcome was negative predictive value.

RESULTS

A total of 204 thyroid nodules were analyzed with ThyroSeq and 62 underwent resection allowing comparison to final pathology for 48 small nodules and 14 large nodules. A greater proportion of large nodules were observed in men (50.0% vs 18.8% in small nodules, P = .02), but median age was similar between the groups (49.0 vs 52.5 years, P = .95). False negative results comprised a higher proportion of tests for large nodules (14.3%) than small nodules (0%, P = .01). The negative predictive value of ThyroSeq in small nodules was 1 indicating a negative test reliably predicted a benign nodule, compared to .5 in large nodules indicating a negative test in this cohort was reliable in predicting benignity. Applying the same negative predictive value to the cohort of large nodules that did not undergo resection after negative molecular testing (n = 16), it is possible that 8 large thyroid malignancies were missed at our institution during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Large thyroid nodules are associated with a higher rate of false negative results and a lower negative predictive value during molecular analysis of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Does Not Influence the Malignancy Risk in Nodules of Category III in the Bethesda System

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules of the Bethesda system in patients with and without Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) and to analyze whether obtaining category III with a repeat FNA (rFNA) increases RoM. The study included 563 HT and 1250 non-HT patients; rFNA was performed in 349 and 575 patients, and surgical treatment in 160 and 390, respectively. There was no difference in RoM between HT and non-HT patients in the whole examined population (lower limit of RoM), nor in operated patients (upper limit of RoM), HT: 5.0−17.5%, non-HT: 4.7−15.1%. RoM in patients with AUS nodules (with nuclear atypia) was similar in both groups (HT: 21.7−40.0%, non-HT: 16.9−41.4%), as it was in patients with FLUS nodules (with architectural atypia) (HT: 3.5−13.3%, non-HT: 4.0−13.0%). In patients from both groups together, with category III diagnosed twice and AUS identified at least once, RoM was 16.7−50.0% and it was higher than that in patients with FLUS nodule diagnosed twice: 3.2−13.0% (p < 0.005). Concluding, RoM in category III nodules is not affected by the presence of HT. Subcategorization of category III nodules (FLUS vs. AUS) may provide guidance toward further follow-up or surgery in both groups.

Outcome of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: A six-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is one of six diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). The goal of our study is to assess the outcome of cases classified as AUS/FLUS at our institution.

METHODS

AUS/FLUS cases were identified by computer searching of the thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases performed between 2010 and 2016. Outcomes were categorized as: follow-up surgery, repeat FNA or no follow-up available. Demographics, ultrasound findings and FNA diagnostic criteria were reviewed for AUS/FLUS cases with follow-up surgical pathology diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA rate was 6% (117 out of 1984 FNAs). Only 15% of the AUS/FLUS cases had repeat FNA, while 41% underwent surgery. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for cases with follow-up surgery was 17%. When considering all AUS/FLUS cases, the ROM was 7%. Statistically, benign neoplasms were more likely to be single lesions on ultrasound comparing to malignant neoplasms, and to exhibit architectural atypia as opposed to non-neoplastic lesions on FNA. The malignancy rates among patients that directly went to surgical resection (17%) and patients having repeat FNA after the first AUS/FLUS diagnosis followed by surgery (29%) was not significantly different. However, repeat FNA was able to reclassify the majority of cases into more definitive categories.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the thyroid FNAs diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in our institution meets the benchmark statistics for AUS/FLUS rate and ROM. This study constitutes a valuable quality assurance measure and serves as a baseline for subsequent quality improvement.

The value of repeating fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is an invaluable technique used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the concordance of results for consecutive FNA readings.

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive.

SETTINGS

Two tertiary care centers.

METHODS

Demographics were collected along with every FNA result and final pathology results for all patients (aged 9-90 years old) who underwent thyroid surgery from 2010 to 2017. The Bethesda system was used for cytology. Agreement levels were calculated and compared with final pathology.

SAMPLE SIZE

Of 1237 initially included, 1134 had at least one FNA performed with results available for review.

RESULTS

For the 1134 patients, demographic and clinical data were collection and a comparison was made between the three FNA results; the highest agreement was between FNA 2 and 3 (53.6%); however, the kappa value was consistently low for all comparisons, indicating a poor level of agreement overall. Also, the risk of malignancy was higher in this study than in the 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in FNA cytology categories I and II.

CONCLUSION

Repeating FNA biopsies yield different results every time; hence, there is a low level of agreement. The clinical decision should therefore include other important risk factors. Prospective studies could help shed more light on this topic.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Molecular tests are being used increasingly as an auxiliary diagnostic tool so as to avoid a diagnostic surgery approach for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Previous test versions, Thyroseq v2 and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), have proven shortcomings in malignancy detection performance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the established Thyroseq v3, Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC), and microRNA-based assays versus prior iterations in ITNs, in light of "rule-in" and "rule-out" concepts. It further analyzed the impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) reclassification and Bethesda cytological subtypes on the performance of molecular tests.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were the databases used for the present research, a process that lasted until September 2020. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) for each panel. The conducted sensitivity analyses addressed different Bethesda categories and NIFTP thresholds.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible studies were included with 7,831 ITNs from 7,565 patients. Thyroseq v3 showed the best overall performance (AUC 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97), followed by Afirma GSC (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.92) and Thyroseq v2 (AUC 0.88; 0.85-0.90). In terms of "rule-out" abilities Thyroseq v3 (NLR 0.02; 95%CI: 0.0-2.69) surpassed Afirma GEC (NLR 0.18; 95%CI: 0.10-0.33). Thyroseq v2 (PLR 3.5; 95%CI: 2.2-5.5) and Thyroseq v3 (PLR 2.8; 95%CI: 1.2-6.3) achieved superior "rule-in" properties compared to Afirma GSC (PLR 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-2.8). Evidence for Thyroseq v3 seems to have higher quality, notwithstanding the paucity of studies. Both Afirma GEC and Thyroseq v2 performance have been affected by NIFTP reclassification. ThyGenNEXT/ThyraMIR and RosettaGX show prominent preliminary results.

CONCLUSION

The newly emerged tests, Thyroseq v3 and Afirma GSC, designed for a "rule-in" purpose, have been proved to outperform in abilities to rule out malignancy, thus surpassing previous tests no longer available, Thyroseq 2 and Afirma GEC. However, Thyroseq v2 still ranks as the best rule-in molecular test.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.

The impact of repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules categorized as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is the most controversial category of the Bethesda System. The present study was conducted to compare the histological findings in a series of thyroid nodules diagnosed with AUS/FLUS after single or repeat fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of our institution's series of 514 patients with an initial diagnosis of AUS/FLUS between 11/2011 and 02/2020.

RESULTS

Of 4887 FNA samples, 11.8% were classified as AUS/FLUS. Of patients with an initial AUS/FLUS diagnosis, 11.5% (59/514) underwent surgery after a single FNA, 55.4% (285/514) had a repeat FNA, and 32.7% (168/514) were either observed or lost to follow-up. Surgical pathology was available in 123 cases (23.9%), and malignancy was confirmed in 32.5% (40/123) cases, with similar rates in the single 32.2% (19/59) and repeat FNA 32.8% (21/64) groups. Repeat FNA reclassified 78.9% of the AUS/FLUS cases to a different category: 57.2% were reclassified as benign, 10.5% as follicular neoplasm, and 5.6% as suspicious for malignancy or malignant. The rates of nonneoplastic benign lesions were 52.5% (31/59) and 31.2% (20/64) in the single and repeat FNA groups, respectively (P = .018). The rates of follicular adenomas were higher when repeat FNA was performed (23/64, 35.9%) compared with a single FNA (9/59; 15.2%) (P = .013).

CONCLUSION

In this series, a repeat FNA in cases of AUS/FLUS increased detection of follicular adenomas but not the detection of malignancy. Repeat FNA reduced the rate of benign nonneoplastic lesions by 40% in the surgical samples.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

High risk of malignancy in cases with atypia of undetermined significance on fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules even after exclusion of NIFTP

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) is the most reliable tool for evaluating thyroid nodules. However, diagnosing Bethesda category III, atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), is a major limitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in AUS/FLUS nodules. A systematic review was also carried out analyzing the largest series.

METHODS

Totally 1750 cases (9%) diagnosed with AUS/FLUS were evaluated retrospectively out of 19 392 cases within last 13 years. All patients undergoing surgery for AUS/FLUS were included into the study. Histopathology results were correlated; the impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) diagnosis on RoM is evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 280 patients (16%) undergoing surgery, neoplasia were detected in 177 (RoN:63.2%) and malignancy in 119 (RoM:42.5%) of these neoplasia. Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) was the commonest malignancy (55.5%). Additional 58 (20.7%) nodules were neoplastic, of which 26 (9.3%) were encapsulated follicular tumors with unknown malignancy potential (FT-UMP) and 32 (11.4%) were follicular adenomas. The remaining 103 patients (36.8%) had non-neoplastic nodules. After reevaluation of the encapsulated FVPTC cases, 20 of them were NIFTP and RoM dropped to 35.4% with a relative decrease of 16.7% and an absolute decrease of 7.1%.

CONCLUSION

In our series, 42.5% of nodules with AUS/FLUS were malignant; 63.2% of them were neoplastic. The RoM and RoN for AUS/FLUS nodules are still much higher than the revised expected RoM of international guidelines even after NIFTP cases excluded. Therefore, current recommendations should be reevaluated periodically in view of detailed clinicopathologic studies.

Malignancy rates for Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study of the correlation between fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has become a well-established modality in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of thyroid nodules. FNAC outcomes are routinely classified using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC), facilitating appropriate clinical management. Bethesda categories III and IV encompass varying risks of malignancy. This retrospective study established a possible association between these cytological categories and malignancy rates in patients treated at a single institution.

METHODS

Over a 6-year period, 11,627 FNAC procedures were performed on thyroid nodules. Of these, 814 (59.63%) patients were submitted to thyroidectomy. The nodules of 108 patients were classified as Bethesda category III and 47 patients as Bethesda category IV. Patient data were reviewed to establish a correlation between the FNAC results and the final histopathological analyses.

RESULTS

The rates of malignancy among patients who underwent surgery were 25% for category III and 27.6% for category IV, with no significant differences between categories (p = 0.67). The pathological parameters of malignant nodules, namely tumour type, size, encapsulation, invasion into the thyroid capsule, extrathyroidal extension and lymphovascular invasion did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides a more precise correlation of malignancy rates with thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda categories III and IV, as our findings are comparable to the literature, giving malignancy rates ranging from 10 to 30% for category III and 25-40% for category IV. Use of the BSRTC is heterogeneous across institutions, and there is some degree of subjectivity in the distinction between categories III and IV; therefore, it is crucial to estimate the rates of malignancy at each institution. Molecular assays are of increasing importance in determining the need for surgical intervention for thyroid lesions. Gene expression assays using FNAC material may demonstrate a high predictive value for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules diagnosed as Bethesda classes III and IV.

Can Repeat Biopsies Change the Prognoses of AUS/FLUS Nodule?

OBJECTIVE

Experience with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) showed that this category exhibited a marked variability in incidence and malignant outcome in resection specimens. We aimed to determine the utility of repeated fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) and ultrasonography to determine the malignancy rate in AUS/FLUS nodules.

METHODS

23,587 nodules were biopsied, and 1,288 had at least one AUS/FLUS cytology. Ultrasonographic features including solid hypoechoic status, irregular margins, microcalcifications, nodule taller than wider, or an extrathyroidal extension were also recorded. Nodules for which only 1 FNAB revealed AUS/FLUS cytology were termed Group 1; nodules that underwent 2, 3, and 4 FNABs were termed Groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively. We compared these groups according to malignancy rates.

RESULTS

576 of nodules underwent only 1 FNAB (Group 1); 505, 174, and 33 underwent 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 FNABs (Group 4), respectively. Fifty-six (30.6%), 45 (27.3%), 18 (30%), and 5 (33.3%) of Groups 1-4 were malignant, respectively. The risk of malignancy was similar in each group (p > 0.05). Suspicious ultrasonographic features were encountered in malignant nodules more than benign nodules (p < 0.05, for each).

CONCLUSION

Repeat biopsy of AUS/FLUS nodules did not enhance the identification of malignancy. Ultrasonographic features may be a better guide for the decision of either surveillance or diagnostic surgery.

The presence of papillary features in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance increases cancer risk and should influence treatment

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of papillary features on risk of malignancy (ROM) within the Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS-FLUS) Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) diagnostic category.

METHODS

A Retrospective review of cases with an AUS-FLUS diagnosis that underwent a thyroidectomy was carried out, and cases were subcategorized based upon the presence of papillary features.

RESULTS

For the entire study population there were 93 (22%) of 427 FNAB specimens that had an AUS-FLUS diagnosis, and a 32% associated ROM. Papillary features were identified in 44 FNAB specimens (47% of the AUS-FLUS cases or 10% of the entire study population), and when present had a 45% ROM. The 49 FNAB specimens (53%) that did not exhibit papillary features had a significantly lower ROM (20%) than those that did have papillary features (p = 0.0069).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of papillary features in a thyroid FNAB with an AUS-FLUS diagnosis is common, and is associated with a higher ROM than is currently suggested by the BSRTC.

The impact of repeat FNA in non-diagnostic and indeterminate thyroid nodules: A 5-year single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

FNA is a well-established method for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but limitations still reside among non-diagnostic and indeterminate samples. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of repeat FNA in thyroid nodules primarily classified as non-diagnostic and indeterminate, with the evaluation of the diagnostic resolution rate after the reassessment of the nodule.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected all cases of thyroid FNA at our institution in the last 5 years that had one or more repeat aspirations of the same nodule, calculating the percentage of samples with change in the diagnostic category. Additional collected data included sex, age and interval between the repeat aspirations.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-eight specimens from 167 patients (140 female, 27 male) with a median age of 56 years (range 11-90) were included in the study. Among the 86 cases primarily classified as non-diagnostic, 25 (29.1%) remained in the same category after the first reassessment and only 18 (20.9%) after the second repeat aspiration. Among the 40 indeterminate cases, only 10 (25%) retained their status after the second aspiration, with no change after the third assessment.

CONCLUSION

Repeat aspiration of non-diagnostic and indeterminate thyroid nodules had a positive impact in both groups, with diagnostic resolution rates of 80% and 75%, respectively. The present study therefore endorses the use of such strategy for the initial follow-up of nodules with no definite diagnosis, especially in low-resource centres with limited access to modern molecular technologies.

Bethesda Category III, IV, and V Thyroid Nodules: Can Nodule Size Help Predict Malignancy?

BACKGROUND

The association of tumor size with malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (atypia of undetermined significance [AUS]/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [FLUS], suspicious for follicular neoplasm [SFN]/Hürthle cell neoplasm [HCN], and suspicious for malignancy [SM]) has not been clearly studied.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively identified 1,104, patients who underwent thyroid FNA and subsequent thyroidectomy. Patients with indeterminate cytology were reviewed. The size of the nodule was determined by ultrasound. Malignancy was confirmed by final histology. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine if nodule size was associated with malignancy.

RESULTS

There were 461 (42%) patients who had indeterminate cytology by FNA. The median nodule size of all indeterminate lesions was 2.1 cm (range 0.5 to 10 cm). The median nodule size for AUS/FLUS was 2.1 cm (range 0.7 to 8 cm), for SFN was 2.4 cm (range 0.5 to 10 cm), for HCN was 2.2 cm (range 0.5 to 9.3 cm), and for SM was 1.6 cm (range 0.5 to 6 cm). On final histology, 121 (28%) index lesions were malignant (AUS 23%; FLUS 14%; SFN 22%; HCN 25%; SM 69%). On logistic regression, nodule size was not associated with increased odds of malignancy in all lesions with indeterminate cytology (odds ratio [OR] 0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00; p = 0.051). Nodule size was not associated with malignancy in the index nodule of AUS/FLUS, SFN, or SM lesions. Increased nodule size was associated with malignancy in HCN lesions (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.16 to 4.04; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that larger HCN nodules are more likely to be malignant. Nodule size alone was not predictive of malignancy in patients with AUS/FLUS, SFN, or SM. Clinical picture, institution-specific malignancy rates, and molecular testing continue to be important factors guiding treatment.

Surgical treatment of thyroid follicular neoplasms: results of a retrospective analysis of a large clinical series

The most appropriate surgical management of "follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm" lesions (FN), considering their low definitive malignancy rate and the limited predictive power of preoperative clinic-diagnostic factors, is still controversial. On behalf of the Italian Association of Endocrine Surgery Units (U.E.C. CLUB), we collected and analyzed the experience of 26 endocrine centers by computerized questionnaire. 1379 patients, surgically treated after a FN diagnosis from January 2012 and December 2103, were evaluated. Histological features, surgical complications, and medium-term outcomes were reported. Total thyroidectomy (TT) was performed in 1055/1379 patients (76.5 %), while hemithyroidectomy (HT) was carried out in 324/1379 cases (23.5 %). Malignancy rate was higher in TT than in HT groups (36.4 vs. 26.2 %), whereas the rates of transient and definitive hypoparathyroidism following TT were higher than after HT. Consensual thyroiditis (16.8 vs. 9.9 %) and patient age (50.9 vs. 47.9 %) also differed between groups. A cytological FN diagnosis was associated to a not negligible malignancy rate (469/1379 patients; 34 %), that was higher in TT than in HT groups. However, a lower morbidity rate was observed in HT, which should be considered the standard of care in solitary lesions in absence of specific risk factors. Malignancy could not be preoperatively assessed and clinical decision-making is still controversial. Further efforts should be spent to more accurately preoperatively classify FN thyroid nodules.

Core-needle biopsy versus repeat fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules initially read as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of core-needle biopsy (CNB) by comparing the results of CNB and repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules that are initially read as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) on FNA.

METHODS

Among 2631 initial AUS/FLUS FNA results, 505 consecutive nodules (295 repeat FNAs and 210 CNBs) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was inconclusive (ie, nondiagnostic or AUS/FLUS). The secondary outcomes included inconclusive results of the subcategory, risk factors for inconclusive results, and diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

CNB demonstrated significantly fewer inconclusive results than repeat FNA for the overall nodules (40.9% vs 63%; p < .001). Repeat FNA and group FLUS were significant risk factors for inconclusive results (odds ratio = 1.92; p =.001 and odds ratio = 2.08; p <.001, respectively). All diagnostic performances using CNB were higher than repeat FNAs.

CONCLUSION

CNB is more useful than repeat FNAs for reducing inconclusive results and improving the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules with initial AUS/FLUS FNA results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 361-369, 2017.

Evaluation and management of thyroid nodules with atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance on fine-needle aspiration

Since the introduction of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in 2008, the management of thyroid nodules has become more standardized, with clearly defined algorithms based on risk of malignancy for each of the six cytologic categories. However, the management of a thyroid nodule with a fine-needle aspiration biopsy classified as Bethesda III, or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), remains controversial due to the cytologic heterogeneity and the variability in the reported rates of malignancy. In this review, the history and rationale for the new Bethesda III category is examined, the reported incidence and risk of malignancy from published studies is reviewed and recommendations for management of patients with a thyroid nodule and AUS/FLUS are provided. Recent advances in molecular analysis and their role in the evaluation of patients with AUS/FLUS are also discussed.

Repeat Diagnoses of Bethesda Category III Thyroid Nodules: What To Do Next?

Objectives

To assess the malignancy rates of thyroid nodules repeatedly classified as Bethesda category III on fine needle aspiration (FNA), and to suggest management guidelines for these lesions.

Methods

This is a retrospective study that included 395 thyroid nodules categorized as Bethesda III undergone either surgery or ultrasound (US) follow-up. There were 67 nodules classified a second time as Bethesda category III on repeat FNA. We compared malignancy rates, clinicopathologic and ultrasonographic characteristics between direct surgery and repeat FNA groups and between the initial and repeat Bethesda category III groups, each. And in the repeat Bethesda III group, clinicopathologic and US variables were compared between benign and malignant nodules.

Results

Incidence of concurrent cancer, underlying thyroiditis and positive BRAF mutation were significantly higher in 142 nodules with direct surgery than 243 nodules with repeat FNA (p < 0.05). Of the 395 nodules with Bethesda category III cytology on initial FNA, the malignancy rate was 59.5%. In 67 nodules with repeat Bethesda III classification, however, the malignancy rate was 73.1% (p < 0.05). However, none of the variables were significantly different between the initial Bethesda category III group and the repeat Bethesda category III group (p > 0.05). In the repeat Bethesda category III group, solid consistency, irregular/microlobulated margins, nonparallel shape, and number of suspicious findings or “suspicious malignant” US assessments were associated with a high malignancy rate (p < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factor associated with malignancy in the repeat Bethesda category III group was irregular/microlobulated margin (odds ratio = 15.576; 95% CI, 2.097–115.6804, p = 0.007) with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 81.6%, 83.3%, 93.0%, 62.5% and 82.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Thyroid nodules with repeated Bethesda category III classification and irregular/microlobulated margins on US are at increased risk of malignancy, and operative management should be considered as opposed to repeat FNA.

Evaluation of indeterminate thyroid cytology by second-opinion diagnosis or repeat fine-needle aspiration: which is the best approach?

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated a published series evaluating the role of second-opinion diagnosis (SOD) or repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (RFNA) for indeterminate thyroid aspirates.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-three studies were selected and the following parameters were analyzed: disagreement between SOD or RFNA and the original diagnosis (OD), reclassification of OD according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, the rate of definitive diagnosis and the diagnostic performance of SOD and RFNA.

RESULTS

7,154 thyroid FNAs were retrieved from 9 studies that investigated the role of SOD, including 1,048 (14.6%) cases originally reported as indeterminate. The 14 studies that analyzed the role of thyroid RFNA comprised 67,581 FNAs and included 7,246 (10.7%) indeterminate cases. A definitive diagnosis was achieved by SOD in 450 cases (42.9%) and RFNA in 1,645 cases (57.2%, p=0.0001). Based on cases with histological follow-up, SOD demonstrated significantly higher rates of positive predictive value and accuracy than RFNA (55.8 vs. 37.7%, p=0.0001; 67.4 vs. 56.0%, p=0.0034, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both SOD and RFNA demonstrated an improvement in the diagnosis of initially indeterminate thyroid FNAs. RFNA achieved a definitive diagnosis for the majority of indeterminate cases. Regarding histological follow-up, SOD was shown to be more accurate than RFNA.

Diagnosis of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The overall malignancy rate for the thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) ranges from 5% to 30%. In this study, we present our institutional experience with thyroid nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and further stratified into subcategories. In addition, we also assessed the significance of various clinicopathologic factors that may influence AUS/FLUS diagnoses and their outcomes.

DESIGN

A search of our laboratory information system was performed to identify all in-house thyroid FNA cases diagnosed as AUS/FLUS from 2008 to 2012. The data were collected and characterized by patient demographic information, cytopathology diagnosis with sub-classifiers and follow-up.

RESULTS

The case cohort included 457 cases diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. These were further sub-classified into one of six subcategories depending on the cytomorphologic findings and suspicion for or against a neoplastic process. Of the 457 cases, repeat FNA and/or surgical follow-up was available in 363 cases. There were 182 (39.8%) cases with cytologic follow-up only; 18 (9.9%) remained as AUS/FLUS, while 158 (86.8%) were re-classified with the majority being benign (142 cases). Histologic follow-up was available in 181 (39.6%) cases. There were 60 malignant cases confirmed by surgical excision, with an overall malignancy rate of 33.1%. The malignancy rate was 38.8% for cases with a repeat FNA versus 25.6% for cases that went directly to surgery without a repeat FNA. Papillary thyroid carcinoma accounted for 93.3% (56 cases) of the malignant cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study, even though the malignancy rate of AUS/FLUS cases is similar to those reported for cases diagnosed as follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm, we are of the belief that these comparable malignancy rates are a product of better clinical management and selection of patients diagnosed as AUS/FLUS for surgery after a repeat FNA.

The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a single-center experience over 5 years

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) was developed to refine fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology definitions and improve clinical management. This study evaluates the impact of the BSRTC 5 years after its adoption at a single institution.

METHODS

A total of 1,625 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in the pre-BSRTC (Group 1: July 2007-January 2009) and post-BSRTC (Group 2: February 2009-September 2013) periods were reviewed. Cytologic diagnoses in Group 1 included non-diagnostic, benign, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy and malignant. Atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) was included in Group 2. The proportions of each FNA category and malignancy rate per cytologic diagnosis were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-four percent (187/347) of Group 1 patients had a preoperative FNA versus 61 % (777/1278) in Group 2 (p = 0.02). Group 1 FNA results included 3 % non-diagnostic, 48 % benign, 17 % follicular, 13 % suspicious for cancer, and 19 % cancer. Group 2 results included 3 % non-diagnostic, 36 % benign, 9 % follicular, 8 % suspicious for malignancy, 18 % malignant and 26 % AUS/FLUS. In Group 2, the proportions of benign, follicular and suspicious for malignancy FNAs decreased significantly (p < 0.05). In Group 2, there were more indeterminate FNA diagnoses overall (30 vs. 43 %; p < 0.001). The rate of cancer in suspicious for cancer FNA lesions increased from 44 to 65 % (p = 0.07). The AUS/FLUS malignancy rate was 15 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the adoption of the BSRTC at our institution, the proportion of indeterminate FNAs has increased; however, the diagnostic accuracy of the suspicious for cancer category improved. We recommend periodic review of the utilization and malignancy rates per cytologic category at each institution to help tailor clinical management.