Thyroid nodules with DICER1 mutation or PTEN alteration: A comparative cytologic, clinical, and molecular study of 117 FNA cases

BACKGROUND

DICER1 mutations and PTEN alterations are increasingly detected by thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Both are associated with nodular thyroid disease and cancer. The authors analyzed a large comparative thyroid FNA cohort with DICER1 mutation or PTEN alteration.

METHODS

A total of 117 thyroid FNAs with DICER1 or PTEN alterations were retrieved from the databases of two academic medical institutions. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic data were collected; FNA slides were analyzed for 29 cytomorphologic features.

RESULTS

Of 117 thyroid FNAs, 36 (30.8%) had DICER1 mutation and 81 (69.2%) showed PTEN alteration. The DICER1 cohort had 33 (91.7%) females and three (8.3%) males (mean, 40.9 years); 61.8% had multinodular disease. FNAs were classified as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 23 (63.9%); follicular neoplasm (FN), 12 (33.3%); and malignant, 1 (2.8%). The PTEN subgroup had 66 (81.5%) females and 15 (18.5%) males (mean, 55.2 years) with increased multinodular disease (93.8%, p = .0016). PTEN FNAs had greater cytologic diversity: non-diagnostic, 2 (2.5%); benign, 5 (6.2%); AUS, 44 (54.3%); FN, 24 (29.6%); and malignant, 6 (7.4%). Both DICER1 and PTEN cases showed a range of resected tumor subtypes. The DICER1 cohort included thyroblastoma, and the PTEN group included anaplastic carcinoma. The cytomorphology of DICER1 and PTEN cases showed overlapping features, especially microfollicular patterns. Minor cytomorphologic differences included papillary patterns in DICER1 (p = .039), and oncocytic changes (p < .0001) in PTEN.

CONCLUSIONS

DICER1 and PTEN FNAs reveal many cytologic similarities. DICER1 patients are younger, and PTEN patients had multinodular disease. Awareness of these genetic cohorts can identify patients at risk for thyroid cancer.

[Molecular and other ancillary tests proposed by The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology 2023]

For the first time the 2023 version of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology dedicates a whole chapter (chapter 14) to ancillary studies almost exclusively represented by molecular testing. The latest data reported bring some evidence that molecular testing could help to optimize the diagnostic performance of « indeterminate » categories (AUS and NF). Other studies suggest a promising role to guide the management of suspicious of malignancy and malignant categories. Indeed, the recognition of prognostic and predictive biomarkers analyzed on cytological samples, regardless of how it is collected, has progressed thanks to advances in our knowledge of molecular abnormalities of thyroid tumors. The chapter 14 is presented here highlighting the current and emerging roles of « in-house » and commercialized molecular testing as presented by TSBRTC.

"Copy number alteration" as the sole molecular finding of a Thyroseq test is more commonly seen in Hurthle cell neoplasms

BACKGROUND

To better understand the molecular alterations associated with Hurthle cell lesions of the thyroid, we retrospectively reviewed the association of clonal DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytomorphology and surgical follow-up.

METHODS

Hurthle cell type (HCT) and non-Hurthle cell type (NHCT) thyroid FNAs that were classified according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (SFN) with corresponding molecular testing performed by ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier were compared to surgical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 54 thyroid FNA cases were identified, distributed among the following categories: AUS-HCT (n = 15, 27.8%), SFN-HCT (n = 11, 20.4%), AUS-NHCT (n = 19, 35.2%), and SFN-NHCT (n = 9, 16.6%). The lesions classified as AUS-HCT and SFN-HCT showed a higher prevalence of CNAs (n = 10/26; 38.5%) compared to their NHCT counterparts (n = 3/28; 10.7%) (p < .03). Of the 42 patients (77.8%) with surgical follow-up, CNAs were more often seen in benign (n = 10/26, 38.5%) than malignant conditions (n = 1/16, 6.3%) (p < .03). CNAs were encountered in more lesions with Hurthle cell features on histologic examination (n = 8/14, 57.1%) than those without (n = 3/28, 10.7%) (p < .002). The presence of CNAs alone was seen only in benign adenomas and more commonly with Hurthle cell features (n = 5/7, 71.4%).

CONCLUSION

In this study, CNAs were associated with Hurthle cell morphology on thyroid FNA and benign adenomas upon surgical follow-up. Therefore, if the only finding of a positive ThyroSeq v3 GC result is a CNA, conservative management can be considered if clinically indicated.

Single Institution Experience with Afirma and Thyroseq Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: Thyroid nodules are a very common often incidental finding on physical examination or imaging. Of those who undergo fine needle aspiration, cytology is indeterminate in up to 15%. Molecular testing is increasingly being used to help identify which nodules may be high risk for malignancy and guide management with regard to clinical follow-up or surgical intervention. Recently there has been an increase in publication of independent studies assessing the performance of these molecular tests and comparing "real-world" data with the validation studies. Methods: This retrospective study identified all thyroid nodules at our institution that had Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC), genomic sequencing classifier (GSC), or Thyroseq v3 molecular testing from January 2014 to January 2020 and compared measurements of test performance between them at our institution, and then with the original validation studies and other published institutional data. Results: Overall, the benign call rate was highest in the Afirma GSC group (78%) compared with the GEC group (60%) and Thyroseq group (66%). Surgical histopathology revealed malignancy in 6 of 31of biopsied nodules in the GEC group, 8 of 13 in the GSC group, and 3 of 16 in the Thyroseq v3 group. Based on our data, the GSC specificity (73.7%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (61.5%) were higher than the GEC specificity (60.4%) and PPV (22.2%) as well as Thyroseq v3 specificity (55.2%) and PPV (18.8%). Conclusions: From our short-term institutional experience, we found that the GSC classified more cytologically indeterminate nodules as benign compared with the Afirma GEC, and had improved specificity and PPV, which is similar to the validation study and other institutions' reported experiences. We also found that the Thyroseq v3 was similar to the Afirma GEC in terms of specificity and PPV, both of which are much lower than the validation studies.

Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Molecular tests are being used increasingly as an auxiliary diagnostic tool so as to avoid a diagnostic surgery approach for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Previous test versions, Thyroseq v2 and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), have proven shortcomings in malignancy detection performance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the established Thyroseq v3, Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC), and microRNA-based assays versus prior iterations in ITNs, in light of "rule-in" and "rule-out" concepts. It further analyzed the impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) reclassification and Bethesda cytological subtypes on the performance of molecular tests.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were the databases used for the present research, a process that lasted until September 2020. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) for each panel. The conducted sensitivity analyses addressed different Bethesda categories and NIFTP thresholds.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible studies were included with 7,831 ITNs from 7,565 patients. Thyroseq v3 showed the best overall performance (AUC 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97), followed by Afirma GSC (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.92) and Thyroseq v2 (AUC 0.88; 0.85-0.90). In terms of "rule-out" abilities Thyroseq v3 (NLR 0.02; 95%CI: 0.0-2.69) surpassed Afirma GEC (NLR 0.18; 95%CI: 0.10-0.33). Thyroseq v2 (PLR 3.5; 95%CI: 2.2-5.5) and Thyroseq v3 (PLR 2.8; 95%CI: 1.2-6.3) achieved superior "rule-in" properties compared to Afirma GSC (PLR 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-2.8). Evidence for Thyroseq v3 seems to have higher quality, notwithstanding the paucity of studies. Both Afirma GEC and Thyroseq v2 performance have been affected by NIFTP reclassification. ThyGenNEXT/ThyraMIR and RosettaGX show prominent preliminary results.

CONCLUSION

The newly emerged tests, Thyroseq v3 and Afirma GSC, designed for a "rule-in" purpose, have been proved to outperform in abilities to rule out malignancy, thus surpassing previous tests no longer available, Thyroseq 2 and Afirma GEC. However, Thyroseq v2 still ranks as the best rule-in molecular test.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.

Indeterminate thyroid nodules in the era of molecular genomics

Background

Indeterminate thyroid nodules are diagnosed in up to 30% of fine‐needle aspirations and the risk of malignancy in these cases are highly variable. Consequently, managing these nodules has been a challenge. While a diagnostic thyroidectomy would help clarify the pathology, there is the risk of developing surgical‐related complications for a procedure that may not have been necessary and associated high costs. Genomic testing of indeterminate thyroid nodules may help better guide management.

Methods

We present an unbiased comprehensive review of available molecular testing for classifying indeterminate thyroid nodules, as well as their strengths and limitations, with the objective to allow practitioners to choose the best testing modality for their patients.

Results

Molecular testing of these nodules provided a platform to help distinguish benign versus malignant nodules, providing more confidence to rule in or rule out the likelihood of thyroid cancer in indeterminate nodules.

Conclusion

Genomic testing has evolved to more comprehensive panels to better stratify indeterminate nodules, including Hürthle cell neoplasms and noninvasive follicular neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear features. Understanding the methodology of each available test improves patient care and reduces unnecessary costs.

Preoperative Molecular Markers in Thyroid Nodules

The need for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules has led to the pursuit of differentiating molecular markers. The most common molecular tests in clinical use are Afirma^® Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Thyroseq^® V2. Despite the rapidly developing field of molecular markers, several limitations exist. These challenges include the recent introduction of the histopathological diagnosis "Non-Invasive Follicular Thyroid neoplasm with Papillary-like nuclear features", the correlation of genetic mutations within both benign and malignant pathologic diagnoses, the lack of follow-up of molecular marker negative nodules, and the cost-effectiveness of molecular markers. In this manuscript, we review the current published literature surrounding the diagnostic value of Afirma^® GEC and Thyroseq^® V2. Among Afirma^® GEC studies, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 75 to 100%, 5 to 53%, 13 to 100%, and 20 to 100%, respectively. Among Thyroseq^® V2 studies, Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV ranged from 40 to 100%, 56 to 93%, 13 to 90%, and 48 to 97%, respectively. We also discuss current challenges to Afirma^® GEC and Thyroseq^® V2 utility and clinical application, and preview the future directions of these rapidly developing technologies.