Surgical and Survival Outcome Following Truly Palliative Gastrectomy in Patients with Incurable Gastric Cancer

Intraoperative assessment of the curative potential to predict survival after gastric cancer resection: A national cohort study

BACKGROUND

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of tumor resection following gastrectomy adds new information that could help clinicians and patients by predicting survival.

METHODS

All patients in Sweden undergoing gastric cancer resection between 2006 and 2018 were grouped according to a prospectively registered variable; the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of surgery: curative, borderline curative, or palliative. Factors affecting group allocation were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, while survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 2341 patients undergoing gastric cancer resection, 1547 (71%) were deemed curative, 340 (15%) borderline curative, and 314 (14%) palliative (140 missing assessments). Advanced stage increased the risk of borderline curative resection (Stage III, odds ratio (OR) = 6.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.92-9.31), as did emergency surgery OR = 3.31 (1.74-6.31) and blood loss >500 mL; OR = 1.63 (1.06-2.49). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion both decreased the risk of borderline curative resection, OR = 0.58 (0.39-0.87) and 0.57 (0.40-0.80), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the surgeon's assessment independently predicted worse survival for borderline curative (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.29-1.83) and palliative resections (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45-2.19), compared to curative resections. The sensitivity of the surgeon's assessment of long-term survival was 96.7%. The PPV was 50.7% and the NPV was 92.1%.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of gastric cancer surgery may independently aid survival prediction and is analogous to prognostication by pathologic Staging. Advanced disease, emergency surgery, and a high intraoperative blood loss, increases the risk of a borderline curative or palliative resection. Conversely, neoadjuvant treatment and MDT discussion reduce the risk of borderline curative or palliative resection.

Role of reduction gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor: Supplementary analysis of REGATTA trial

Background

REGATTA trial failed to demonstrate the survival benefit of reduction gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor. However, a significant interaction was found between the treatment effect and tumor location in the subset analysis. Additionally, the treatment effect appeared to be different between Japan and Korea. This supplementary analysis aimed to elucidate the effect of reduction surgery based on tumor location and country.

Methods

Multivariable Cox regression analyses in each subgroup were performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HRadj), including the following variables as explanatory variables: country, age, sex, incurable factor, cT, cN, primary tumor, performance status, histological type, and macroscopic type.

Results

Patients (95 in Japan and 80 in Korea) were randomized to chemotherapy alone (86 patients) or gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (89 patients). The subgroup analysis according to the country revealed a worse overall survival in gastrectomy plus chemotherapy arm in Japan (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-2.05), but not in Korea (hazard ratio: 0.85.95% confidence interval: 0.52-1.40). Overall survival was better in distal gastrectomy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.13), and worse in total gastrectomy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.93-1.94), which was more remarkable in Korea than in Japan.

Conclusions

Primary chemotherapy is a standard of care for advanced gastric cancer; however, the survival benefits from reduction by distal gastrectomy remained controversial.

Efficacy of palliative surgery for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis who still have residual peritoneal dissemination after chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) are generally treated with systemic chemotherapy. When PM has disappeared because of chemotherapy, radical gastrectomy (so-called conversion surgery) is usually performed. We have previously reported the efficacy of conversion surgery, but there are no reports examining the efficacy of palliative gastrectomy for patients with residual PM after chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of palliative surgery for gastric cancer patients with PM who still have residual peritoneal dissemination after chemotherapy.

METHODS

Twenty-five gastric cancer patients with PM confirmed by laparoscopy and who had received chemotherapy but who still had residual PM were included in this study. Among the 25 patients, palliative surgery was performed in 20 patients (PS group) and chemotherapy was continued in 5 patients (CTx group), and their therapeutic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In the PS group, total and distal gastrectomies were performed. Clavien-Dindo grade I postoperative complications occurred in two patients (10%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Postoperative chemotherapy was performed all cases. In the PS group, the median survival time (MST) reached 22.5 months, with 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates of 95% and 45%, respectively, whereas in the CTx group, the MST was 15.8 months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 60% and 0%, respectively. The PS group had significantly longer OS than the CTx group (P=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative surgery is safe and may prolong survival in gastric cancer patients with residual PM after chemotherapy.

Clinical outcomes of palliative treatment for gastric bleeding from incurable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Deciding palliative treatment for gastric bleeding from incurable gastric cancer (IGC) is worrying considering different patient situations and the lack of comprehensive assessment of palliative treatment. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after palliative treatment for gastric bleeding from IGC.

METHODS

We enrolled 48 consecutive patients with gastric bleeding from IGC who underwent palliative surgery (PS) or palliative radiotherapy (PRT).

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, 23 underwent PS and 25 received PRT. More patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 or who received chemotherapy underwent PRT than underwent PS. Severe complications were observed in 2 (8.6%) patients after PS. After PRT, 22 patients achieved hemostasis (88%), but rebleeding was found in 10 (40%). Chemotherapy was introduced after palliative treatment for 21 (91.3%) patients in the PS group and 17 (68%) patients in the PRT group. The median survival time (MST) of patients with and without chemotherapy after PS was 12.5 and 3.1 months, respectively (p ≤ 0.001), while the MST of patients with and without chemotherapy after PRT was 6.5 and 1.6 months (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified ECOG-PS, tumor size, and chemotherapy after palliative treatment as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative treatment strategies for gastric bleeding should be determined with consideration of the general condition, previous chemotherapy, and chemotherapy after palliative treatment.

Peri-operative Outcomes and Survival Following Palliative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with gastric cancer present with late stage disease. Palliative gastrectomy remains a contentious intervention aiming to debulk tumour and prevent or treat complications such as gastric outlet obstruction, perforation and bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature for all papers describing palliative resections for gastric cancer and reporting peri-operative or survival outcomes. Data from peri-operative and survival outcomes were meta-analysed using random effects modelling. Survival data from patients undergoing palliative resections, non-resective surgery and palliative chemotherapy were also combined. This study was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42019159136).

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight papers which included 58,675 patients contributed data. At 1 year, there was a significantly improved survival in patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy when compared to non-resectional surgery and no treatment. At 2 years following treatment, palliative gastrectomy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy only; however, there was no significant improvement in survival compared to patients who underwent non-resectional surgery after 1 year. Palliative resections were associated with higher rates of overall complications versus non-resectional surgery (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.34, 3.46; p < 0.001). However, palliative resections were associated with similar peri-operative mortality rates to non-resectional surgery.

CONCLUSION

Palliative gastrectomy is associated with a small improvement in survival at 1 year when compared to non-resectional surgery and chemotherapy. However, at 2 and 3 years following treatment, survival benefits are less clear. Any survival benefits come at the expense of increased major and overall complications.

Palliative Gastrectomy versus Gastrojejunostomy for advanced Gastric cancer with outlet obstruction: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a late complication of advanced gastric cancer, and it is controversial how to select the therapeutic strategies: gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy? Therefore, this study was to compare the surgical and survival outcomes of gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy.

Methods

In total, 199 gastric cancer patients with outlet obstruction treated by surgery between January 2000 and December 2015 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the selection bias.

Results

After 1:1 PSM, a total of 104 patients were included for final analysis. The median overall survival (OS) times in the gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group were 8.50 and 11.87 months, respectively (P = 0.243). The postoperative complication rates in the gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group were 19.23% (10/52) and 17.31% (9/52), respectively (P = 0.800), and no treatment-related death was observed. Multivariate analysis showed that periton0eal seeding (P = 0.014) and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Among them, peritoneal seeding was a risk factor and postoperative chemotherapy was a protective factor.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that although the surgical complications of palliative gastrectomy were manageable, it showed no survival benefit. Therefore, relieving obstruction symptom, improving patients’ quality of life and creating better conditions for chemotherapy appear to be the main therapeutic strategies for advanced gastric cancer with GOO.

Survival benefits of palliative gastrectomy in stage IV gastric cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

Background

This study aimed to investigate the effect of palliative gastrectomy on survival in stage IV gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage IV gastric cancer between 2010 and 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for survival in patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy.

Results

We examined 6,529 patients with stage IV gastric cancer, of which 625 underwent palliative gastrectomy. Using a 1:2 PSM, the 625 patients were matched with 1,250 patients from the no gastrectomy group. The overall survival was higher in the gastrectomy group before [hazard ratio (HR) =0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.62, P<0.0001] and after PSM (HR =0.51, 95% CI: 0.46-0.57, P<0.0001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed the survival benefits of palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy. Older age, over-lapping lesions, non-adenocarcinomas, higher tumor grade, and lung metastasis significantly increased the risk of mortality. In the gastrectomy group, patients aged ≥80 years, diagnosed with grades 3/4 non-adenocarcinomas, or with lung metastasis showed poorer prognosis. However, chemotherapy could improve the survival of these patients.

Conclusions

Palliative gastrectomy provides survival benefits to stage IV gastric cancer patients. However, age, tumor grade, tumor histology, and lung metastasis status should be considered while making a decision regarding gastrectomy. Chemotherapy should also be recommended for these patients.

Notch1 and PI3K/Akt signaling blockers DAPT and LY294002 coordinately inhibit metastasis of gastric cancer through mutual enhancement

PURPOSE

Blockade of either Notch1 or PI3K/Akt pathway inhibits metastasis of gastric cancer. However, whether blockade of both pathways coordinately exerts such an effect remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of combined treatment with Notch1 signaling blocker DAPT and PI3K/Akt signal blocker LY294002 on metastasis of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) levels in gastric cancer tissues and their adjacent normal tissue samples and gastric cancer SGC7901 and AGS cells and normal GES-1 cells were determined using immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. The effects of combined DAPT and LY294002 on metastasis of gastric cancer were evaluated by examining migration and invasion potential of SGC7901 cells using wound healing and transwell assays, determining changes in the levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers and MMP-9, Notch1, HES1, and phosphorylation of Akt in gastric cancer SGC7901 cells and/or AGS cells in vitro using Western blotting, and metastasis of gastric cancer to lungs in BALB/c nude mice after treatment.

RESULTS

NICD and p-Akt levels were significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues and SGC7901 and AGS cells than those in the normal control and GES-1 cells. Migration and invasion potential of SGC7901 cells, EMT biomarkers and MMP-9 in SGC7901 cells, and metastasis of gastric cancer to lungs in mice were coordinately inhibited by DAPT and LY294002. In addition, DAPT and LY294002 coordinately inhibited the levels of Notch1, HES1, and p-Akt in gastric cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

DAPT and LY294002 coordinately inhibited metastasis of gastric cancer through mutual enhancement.

Value in palliative cancer surgery: A critical assessment

Emergency operations are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost compared to elective operations. Palliative and emergent surgery for patients with advanced malignancies is associated with additional risk and remains controversial. Emergent or palliative interventions can be broadly categorized according to indication. Tumor related complications (bleeding, obstruction, or perforation) merit specific consideration, as do specific presentations such as pneumoperitoneum, pneumatosis intestinalis, or peritonitis from other causes that may arise during active therapy for malignancies. Although nonoperative, endoscopic, and interventional treatment modalities are frequently available, surgery remains the only effective therapy in selected situations such as small intestinal obstruction and tumor perforation. Selection of patients for surgery requires consideration of factors including overall prognosis, performance status, and patients' priorities. Selection and risk assessment tools underscore the limited capacity of patients' with higher risk features for durable recovery but do not supplant nuanced clinical judgment. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:311-315. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.