A Clear Difference Between the Outcomes After a Major Hepatectomy With and Without an Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection

Long-term remnant liver volume dynamics after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma following portal vein embolization

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) followed by major hepatectomy is a common treatment strategy for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC); however, the long-term dynamics of the liver remnant volume (LRV) remain unclear. Here, we report the dynamics of the LRV in patients who underwent hepatectomy following PVE.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with PHCC who underwent right hemihepatectomy or left trisectionectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection between 2004 and 2021 were enrolled in this study [PVE (n = 27) and non-PVE (n = 12]). Long-term remnant liver dynamics were analyzed in propensity score-matched pairs (n = 10/group).

RESULTS

The LRV/future liver remnant volume (FLRV) at 1 week to 1 month after hepatectomy were smaller in the PVE group than in the non-PVE group (1.53 vs. 1.69, p = .044 and 1.52 vs 1.99, p = .003, respectively). In the non-PVE group, the LRV/FLRV ratio plateaued 1-3 months postoperatively, whereas progressive hypertrophy occurred in the PVE group, and the LRV/FLRV ratio became equal in both groups at 1 year after hepatectomy (1.96 vs. 1.97; p = .799). Multivariate analysis revealed that FLRV/total liver volume (TLV) ≤ 0.43 was the only independent predictor of LRV/FLRV ≥1.9 at 1 year after hepatectomy (odds ratio:5.345, 95% confidence interval:1.210-23.615; p = .027).

CONCLUSION

Although the long-term LRV was nearly equal in both groups, short-term LRV hypertrophy was lower in the PVE group than in the non-PVE group.

Liver remnant volume to body weight ratio of 0.65% as a lower limit in right hepatic trisectionectomy with bile duct resection

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested the utility of an indocyanine green plasma clearance rate of the future liver remnant (FLR) (ICGK-F) ≥0.05 in hepatobiliary resection to reduce the surgical risk. The present study aimed to verify whether future liver remnant size rather than ICGK-F matters in extended hepatobiliary resection.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2021, patients who underwent right hepatic trisectionectomy with bile duct resection were included. The effect of the FLR volume-to-body weight ratio (FLR/BW) and ICGK-F on posthepatectomy liver failure was evaluated along with other parameters.

RESULTS

Among 91 study patients, the median ICGK-F, FLR, and FLR/BW were 0.057 (range, 0.027-0.099), 392 mL (145-705), and 0.78% (0.40-1.37), respectively. Posthepatectomy liver failure occurred in 23 patients. The incidence was 10 (40%) in 25 patients with an ICGK-F <0.05 and 12 (18%) in 65 patients with an ICGK-F ≥0.05 (P = .053); 13 (52%) in 25 patients with a FLR/BW <0.65% and 10 (15%) in 66 patients with a FLR/BW ≥0.65% (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that a FLR/BW <0.65% (odds ratio, 11.7; P = .005), age ≥65 years (odds ratio, 31.7; P < .001), and blood loss ≥25 mL/kg (odds ratio, 22.1; P = .004) were independent predictors of posthepatectomy liver failure, but ICGK-F <0.05 was not (P = .499). According to the meeting number of 3 factors, posthepatectomy liver failure incidence was 0 of 22 (0%) in patients with 0 factors, 6 of 43 (14%) in patients with 1, and 17 of 26 (65%) in patients with 2 or 3 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A FLR/BW ≥0.65% may serve as a volumetric basis to reduce posthepatectomy liver failure after extended hepatobiliary resection.

The Short- and Long-Term Surgical Results of Consecutive Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Wide-Spread Biliary Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Cancer-free resection (R0) is one of the most important factors for the long-term survival of biliary carcinoma. For some patients with widespread invasive cancer located between the hilar and intrapancreatic bile duct, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is considered a radical surgery for R0 resection. However, HPD is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, previous reports have not shown lymph node metastasis (LNM) status, such as the location or number, which could influence the prognosis after HPD. In this study, first, we explored the prognostic factors for survival, and second, we evaluated whether the LNM status (number and location of LNM) would influence the decision on surgical indications in patients with widely spread biliary malignancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 54 patients who underwent HPD with hepatectomy in ≥2 liver sectors from January 2003 to December 2021 (HPD-G). We also evaluated 54 unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy from January 2010 to December 2021 (CTx-G).

RESULTS

R0 resection was performed in 48 patients (89%). The median survival time (MST) and 5-year overall survival rate of the HPD-G and CTx-G groups were 36.9 months and 31.1%, and 19.6 months and 0%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pathological portal vein involvement was an independent prognostic factor for survival (MST: 18.9 months). Additionally, patients with peripancreatic LNM had worse prognoses (MST: 13.3 months) than CTx-G.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peripancreatic LNM or PV invasion might be advised to be excluded from surgery-first indications for HPD.

Morbidity after left trisectionectomy for hepato-biliary malignancies: An analysis of the National Clinical Database of Japan

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the nationwide surgical outcome of a left trisectionectomy (LT) and to identify the perioperative risk factors associated with its morbidity.

METHODS

Cases of LT for hepato-biliary malignancies registered at the Japanese National Clinical Database between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the perioperative risk factors associated with a morbidity of Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) ≥III.

RESULTS

Left trisectionectomy was performed on 473 and 238 cases of biliary and nonbiliary cancers, respectively. Morbidity of CD ≥III and V occurred in 45% and 5% of cases with biliary cancer, respectively, compared with 26% and 2% of cases with nonbiliary cancer, respectively. In multivariable analyses, biliary cancer was significantly associated with a morbidity of CD ≥III (odds ratio, 1.87; p = .018). In subgroup analyses for biliary cancer, classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) 2, portal vein resection (PVR), and intraoperative blood loss ≥30 mL/kg were significantly associated with a morbidity of CD ≥III.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary cancer induces severe morbidity after LT. The ASA-PS classification, PVR, and intraoperative blood loss indicate severe morbidity after LT for biliary cancer.

Difficulty of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with biliary tract cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the difficulty of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with biliary tract carcinoma (BTC).

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with BTC who underwent curative-intent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were stratified into two groups according to the presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy administration (adjuvant and non-adjuvant groups), and the clinicopathological features were compared between the two groups. The ratios of adjuvant chemotherapy administration were investigated in each surgical procedure. Independent factors associated with no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed using multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 168 eligible patients, 141 (83.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (adjuvant group), while 27 (16.1%) did not (non-adjuvant group). The most common surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy in the adjuvant group, and it was hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR) in the non-adjuvant group, respectively. The rate of no adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients who underwent hepatectomy with BDR than in those who underwent other surgeries (p < 0.001). The most common cause of no adjuvant chemotherapy was bile leak in 12 patients, which occurred after hepatectomy with BDR in ten patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that hepatectomy with BDR and preoperative anemia were independently associated with no adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy with BDR and subsequent refractory bile leak can be the obstacle to adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with BTC.

Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (POP) after hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR) and elucidated risk factors for POP.

METHODS

A total of 257 patients undergoing hepatectomy with BDR between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the incidence of POP, defined by the Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II. The predictive factors for POP were identified using logistic regression analysis of the pre- and intraoperative evaluable factors.

RESULTS

Postoperative pneumonia developed in 15 patients (5.8%), diagnosed as grade IV or V in five patients. In a multivariate analysis, a vital capacity ratio (%VC) <80% (odds ratio [OR] 7.30, P = .005), age ≥ 74 years old (OR 5.39, P = .026), and future liver volume remnant (FLR) ratio ≤ 40% (OR 4.97, P = .045) were independent risk factors for POP. Among patients with performing spirometry, the incidence of developing POP was 1.0%, 8.8%, and 60% in patients with 0, 1-2, and 3 risk factors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of POP in patients undergoing hepatectomy with BDR was 5.8%. A %VC <80%, age ≥74 years old, and FLR ratio ≤40% were identified as preoperative predictive factors of developing POP.

A proposal of drain removal criteria in hepatobiliary resection

BACKGROUND

Standardized criteria for the drain removal in hepatobiliary resection are lacking. We evaluated the outcomes of delayed removal policy in this extended surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The drains were removed on postoperative day (POD) 7 when the drainage fluid was grossly serous, biochemically normal, and negative for bacterial contamination as assessed by Gram staining; additionally, no abnormal fluid collection was confirmed by computed tomography. Clinically relevant abdominal complications (CRACs), including biliary leakage, pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess, served as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Among 374 study patients, surgical drains were removed in 166 (44.3%) patients who met the criteria. Of these patients, 16 (9.6%) patients required additional drainage afterwards due to CRAC. Drains were retained and exchanged in 208 (55.6%) patients who did not meet the criteria. Of them, exchanged drains were soon removed in 34 patients due to no signs of CRAC. The diagnostic ability of the criteria revealed 0.916 sensitivity, 0.815 specificity, and 0.866 accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The four findings on POD 7 worked well as criteria for drain removal, and these criteria may be helpful in drain management after hepatobiliary resection.

Validation study of postoperative liver failure and mortality risk scores after liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) remains a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality. The Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center proposed a postoperative mortality risk score (POMRS) and post-hepatectomy liver failure score (PHLFS) to predict patient outcomes. This study aimed to validate the POMRS and PHLFS for PHCC patients at Hokkaido University.

METHODS

Medical records of 260 consecutive PHCC patients who had undergone major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection without pancreaticoduodenectomy at Hokkaido University between March 2001 and November 2018 were evaluated to validate the PHLFS and POMRS.

RESULTS

The observed risks for PHLF were 13.7%, 24.5%, and 39.8% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively, in the study cohort. A receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the PHLFS had moderate predictive value, with an analysis under the curve (AUC) value of 0.62. Mortality rates based on the POMRS were 1.7%, 5%, and 5.1% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. The ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC value of 0.58.

CONCLUSIONS

This external validation study showed that for PHLFS the threshold for discrimination in an Eastern cohort was reached (AUC >0.6), but it would require optimization of the model before use in clinical practice is acceptable. The POMRS were not applicable in the eastern cohort. Further external validation is recommended.

Utility of remnant liver volume for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection is associated with a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). However, the utility of the remnant liver volume (RLV) in cholangiocarcinoma has not been studied intensively.

METHODS

Patients who underwent major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection between 2002 and 2018 were reviewed. The RLV was divided by body surface area (BSA) to normalize individual physical differences. Risk factors for clinically relevant PHLF were evaluated with special reference to the RLV/BSA.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were included. The optimal cut-off value for RLV/BSA was determined to be 300 ml/m2. Thirty-two patients (11.1 per cent) developed PHLF. PHLF was more frequent in patients with an RLV/BSA below 300 ml/m2 than in those with a value of 300 ml/m2 or greater: 19 of 87 (22 per cent) versus 13 of 202 (6.4 per cent) (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, RLV/BSA below 300 ml/m2 (P = 0.013), future liver remnant plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green less than 0.075 (P = 0.031), and serum albumin level below 3.5 g/dl (P = 0.015) were identified as independent risk factors for PHLF. Based on these risk factors, patients were classified into three subgroups with low (no factors), moderate (1-2 factors), and high (3 factors) risk of PHLF, with PHLF rates of 1.8, 14.8 and 63 per cent respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An RLV/BSA of 300 ml/m2 is a simple predictor of PHLF in patients undergoing hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection.

Importance of "muscle" and "intestine" training before major HPB surgery: A review

Major hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery is one of the most invasive abdominal surgeries. Through the experiences of several clinical trials, including those involving patients undergoing major HPB surgery, we have recognized the importance of "muscle" and "intestine" training before surgery. This review article summarizes the results of our clinical trials, specifically focusing on the importance of "muscle" and "intestine". The patients with low skeletal muscle mass or those with low functional exercise capacity showed a significantly worse postoperative course and poor long-term survival after surgery for HPB malignancy. The introduction of prehabilitation (preoperative physical and nutritional support) improved nutritional status and functional exercise capacity, even in patients with malignancy. Daily physical activity was correlated with nutritional status before surgery. These results indicated the usefulness of prehabilitation. The intestinal microenvironment, which is extrapolated from the fecal concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), showed a significant association with the incidence of surgery-induced bacterial translocation and postoperative infectious complications (POICs). The use of perioperative synbiotics not only increased the fecal levels of SCFAs but also prevented the incidence of POICs. A recent study also indicated that there are correlations between muscle mass and the intestinal microenvironment. Further investigation is required to determine the best "muscle" and "intestine" training protocol to improve the outcomes of major HPB surgeries.

Issues to be considered to address the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomy

An accurate preoperative evaluation of the hepatic function and application of portal vein embolization in selected patients have helped improve the safety of major hepatectomy. In planning major hepatectomy, however, several issues remain to be addressed. The first is which cut-off values for serum total bilirubin level and prothrombin time should be used to define post-hepatectomy liver failure. Other issues include what minimum future liver remnant (FLR) volume is required; whether the total liver volume measured using computed tomography or the standard liver volume calculated based on the body surface area should be used to assess the adequacy of the FLR volume; whether there is a discrepancy between the FLR volume and function during the recovery period after portal vein embolization or hepatectomy; and how best the function of a specific FLR can be assessed. Various studies concerning these issues have been reported with controversial results. We should also be aware that different strategies and management are required for different types of liver damage, such as cirrhosis in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangitis in biliary tract cancer, and chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury.

Impact of Perioperative Steroid Administration in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

To date, five randomized controlled trials have assessed the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration in hepatectomy; however, all of these studies involved a substantial number of 'minor' hepatectomies. The benefit of steroid administration for patients undergoing 'complex' hepatectomy, such as major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration for complex major hepatectomy.

METHODS

Patients with suspected hilar malignancy scheduled to undergo major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection were randomized into either the control or steroid groups. The steroid group received hydrocortisone 500 mg immediately before hepatic pedicle clamping, followed by hydrocortisone 300 mg on postoperative day (POD) 1, 200 mg on POD 2, and 100 mg on POD 3. The control group received only physiologic saline. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative liver failure.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were randomized to either the control (n = 46) or steroid (n = 48) groups. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics; however, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of grade B/C postoperative liver failure (control group, n = 8, 17%; steroid group, n = 4, 8%; p = 0.188) and other complications. Serum bilirubin levels on PODs 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the steroid group than those in the control group; however, these median values were within normal limits in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative steroid administration did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including liver failure following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection.

Combined biembolization induces higher hypertrophy than portal vein embolization before major liver resection

BACKGROUND

Combined preoperative portal and hepatic vein embolization (biembolization, BE) has been recently described and may further enhance preoperative FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of combined preoperative biembolization and portal vein embolization (PVE).

METHODS

This study was performed between 2010 and 2017. From 2010 to 2014, patients only underwent preoperative PVE. After 2014, BE was proposed as an alternative to PVE. Liver volumetry was assessed by a CT-scan before BE or PVE and then three weeks later.

RESULTS

During the study period, 72 patients underwent radiological procedures that included 41 PVE (PVE group) and 31 BE (BE group). The time elapsing between the procedure and surgery was similar (p = 0.760). The mean percentage of FLR ratio hypertrophy in the PVE group was 31.9% (±34), but reached 51.2% (±42) in the BE group (p = 0.018) and this difference remained significant under multivariate analysis that included age, gender, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis and NASH. The kinetic growth rates were 19% (±17%) and 8% (±13%) in the BE and PVE groups, respectively (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that BE induces higher hypertrophy than portal vein embolization before major liver resection with no more morbidity.

Discrepancy between volume and functional recovery in early phase liver regeneration following extended hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection

AIM

To elucidate the clinical factors having an impact on liver regeneration rate following preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) and subsequent extended hepatectomy. The correlation between liver volume and functional recovery after extended hepatectomy was also investigated.

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent extended hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection following PVE for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively with attention to liver regeneration. All patients underwent computed tomography before PVE, after PVE (immediately before surgery), and on postoperative day (POD) 7. The kinetic growth rate (KGR) was calculated as the percent increase in liver volume relative to the future liver remnant volume per day after PVE (KGR_PVE ) and after POD 7 (KGR_POD7 ) using the computed tomography images before PVE, after PVE, and on POD 7.

RESULTS

In the 289 study patients, the median of KGR_PVE was 1.35%/day whereas that of KGR_POD7 was 5.56%/day. The extent of liver resection had the greatest impact on both KGR_PVE and KGR_POD7 and the impacts of other factors were less. There was a significant negative correlation between KGR_PVE and KGR_POD7 (P = 0.002). No correlations were observed between KGR_PVE or KGR_POD7 and serum total bilirubin and prothrombin time - international normalized ratio on POD 7, nor in the incidence of liver failure after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Early phase liver regeneration after extended hepatectomy was largely influenced by the extent of liver resection and showed no correlation with the indices of liver failure. There was a discrepancy between volume and functional recovery in early phase liver regeneration.

Advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: An aggressive surgical approach for the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Perioperative management, extended procedures, and multidisciplinary approaches

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is a highly intractable malignancy. One of the reasons for its intractability is that most patients with the disease are diagnosed with an advanced stage of the disease at their initial presentation. Surgical resection is the standard therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, providing a chance for a cure, and an aggressive surgical approach substantially increases the number of resectable tumors that are initially regarded as unresectable tumors. The success and standardization of the aggressive approach is warranted by meticulous preoperative management that prevents fatal postoperative complications. Extended resection procedures, including hepatic trisectionectomy for Bismuth type IV tumors, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors with extensive longitudinal tumor spreading, and combined vascular resection with reconstruction for tumors with the involvement of hepatic vascular structures, have been challenged to expand the surgical indication. Due to acceptable surgical/survival outcomes, the three extended procedures are currently regarded as extended but standard options in specialized hepatobiliary centers. Although it remains a controversial multidisciplinary approach, the combination of these extended procedures with an adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment is a promising approach for further improving the resectability of tumors and the survival of patients.

Postoperative Liver Failure Criteria for Predicting Mortality after Major Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (Hx with EBDR) that may cause severe morbidity and even death. The purpose of this study was to compare several criteria systems as predictors of PHLF-related mortality following Hx with EBDR for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 222 patients who underwent Hx with EBDR for PHCC. We compared several criteria systems, including previously established criteria (the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criterion; and the "50-50" criterion), and our institution's novel systems "Max T-Bili" defined as total bilirubin (T-Bili) >7.3 mg/dL during post-operative days (POD) 1-7, and the "3-4-50" criterion, defined as total bilirubin >4 mg/dL and prothrombin time <50% on POD #3.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (5.8%) died from PHLF-related causes. The 3-4-50 criterion showed high positive predictive values (39.1%), the 3-4-50, Max T-Bili, and 50-50 criterion showed high accuracies (91.7, 86.9, and 90.5%, respectively) and varying sensitivities (69.2, 69.2, and 38.5% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-4-50, Max T-Bili, and 50-50 criterion were all useful for predicting PHLF-related mortality after Hx with EBDR for PHCC.