Are Incidental Gallbladder Cancers Missed with a Selective Approach of Gallbladder Histology at Cholecystectomy?

Gallbladder Cancer

Gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary tract malignancy, often detected incidentally post-cholecystectomy or at an advanced stage, historically linked to a poor prognosis. Advances in minimally invasive surgery and systemic therapies have improved outcomes. Global incidence varies, with risk factors including gender, age, gallbladder disease history, and polyp size influencing malignancy risks. Management involves cross-sectional imaging, staging laparoscopy in select cases, and radical cholecystectomy with lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy, though its use is limited. Trials are ongoing assessing the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Prognosis depends on the tumor stage, with early detection crucial for long-term survival.

Reconsidering Routine Histopathological Examination of Gallbladder Specimens in Cholecystectomy: Optimizing Clinical Practice and Resource Management

Introduction Cholecystectomy, the surgical removal of the gallbladder, is a common procedure worldwide. Despite no visible anomalies, routine histopathological examination (HPE) of gallbladder specimens post-surgery is standard practice to exclude pathologies, notably gallbladder cancer (GBC). Incidence rates of GBC vary geographically and ethnically. Surgical intervention is recommended for advanced GBC stages, while early stages may require cholecystectomy alone. Although rare, GBC and bile duct cancers pose increased risks in certain demographics, such as women and individuals over 65. Routine HPE practices vary globally based on resource availability and GBC incidence. This study assesses the necessity of routine HPE by evaluating the selective processing of gallbladder specimens suspected of GBC, prioritizing patient safety. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study conducted at Redland Hospital, a district general hospital in Australia, investigated the necessity of routine HPE for excised gallbladder specimens. Adhering to routine HPE policy, the study encompassed all elective and emergency cholecystectomies performed from January 2023 to December 2023, excluding pediatric cases, concurrent surgical procedures, and those with suspected malignancy. Demographic data, surgery indications, intraoperative findings, histopathological results, and incidental gallbladder cancer (IGC) outcomes were analyzed. Pathology reports and case documentation were reviewed for cancerous pathology indicators. Results Over the one-year study period from January 2023 to December 2023, a total of 266 gallbladder specimens were subjected to HPE post-cholecystectomy. Of these, 201 were female and 65 were male, yielding a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. Elective cholecystectomy was performed on 56.4% (150) of patients, while 43.6% (116) underwent emergency procedures. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was the primary surgical approach, except for one case requiring conversion to an open procedure. None of the patients exhibited GBC; however, 3.3% (9) displayed premalignant histopathological features in their specimens. Conclusion In conclusion, adopting a selective approach, where only gallbladder specimens with macroscopic abnormalities undergo HPE, seems prudent, especially in regions with low GBC incidence. Our study, which revealed no cases of GBC, supports this approach. It not only reduces the risk of missing incidental carcinoma in clinically unsuspected cases but also proves cost-effective and reduces the histopathology department workload without compromising patient outcomes. Therefore, we advocate for routine macroscopic examination of gallbladder specimens for abnormalities before HPE submission, particularly in cholecystectomy patients with gallstone disease.

Late port-site metastasis of unexpected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Incidental gallbladder carcinoma refers to a discovery of gallbladder cancer during or after cholecystectomy. Late port-site metastasis (PSM) following Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is rare with an incidence rate of 10.3%.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report a case of a 58-year-old man who presented with a painful abdominal wall mass for 6 weeks. He had a history of LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 8 years prior.

DIAGNOSIS

Histopathological examination revealed a positive result for metastatic adenocarcinoma from the abdominal wall mass. Moreover, Positron emission tomography (PET) showed a small focus of intense fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the gallbladder bed, which was highly suspicious for malignancy.

INTERVENTION

Decision was to proceed with surgery owing to uptake in the gallbladder bed with single-site metastasis to the previous port site. In addition, in the board meeting, an agreement was reached for performing distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy owing to uncertainty of malignancy based on what was discovered during the full metastatic workup. Diagnostic laparoscopy followed by midline laparotomy performed. Radical completion cholecystectomy with lymphadenectomy was done. Followed by complete resection of the anterior abdominal wall. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were then performed.

OUTCOME

Pathological diagnosis showed metastatic/invasive, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with positive margins on the posterior surface of excised port-site mass. The positive margins necessitated further chemoradiotherapy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy until lung metastasis was identified. After this, the patient was scheduled for palliative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Presence of PSM is often associated with peritoneal metastasis. For this reason, it is advised to evaluate the patient for possible metastasis.

Treatment Outcomes of Incidental Gallbladder Cancer - Results from a High-Volume Tertiary Care Centre in North India

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a lethal disease. Incidentally detected gallbladder cancer (IGBC) presents a unique opportunity for early management and better outcomes. We present the institutional experience of a high-volume tertiary care center in northern India. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed and data of all IGBC patients between January 2014 to December 2021 was analyzed. There were 125 patients of IGBC among the 750 patients of GBC seen during the study period. Of these 125 patients, 72 (57.6%) patients were not eligible for surgery. Successful completion radical cholecystectomy (CRC) was possible in 37 (69.8%) of the 53 patients who underwent surgery. On univariate analysis, thickness of gallbladder wall 10 mm or more (p < 0.001, OR 19.0, 95% CI 4.58-78.76), pathological stage (p < 0.001, OR 5.8, 95% CI 2.45-14.98) and median delay of 16 weeks or more (p < 0.001, OR 17.0, 95% CI = 4.08-70.76), were associated with inoperability. However, on multivariate analysis only gallbladder wall thickness of 10 mm or more (p < 0.001, AOR 17.9, 95% CI 3.24-98.78) and median delay of 16 weeks or more (p < 0.001, AOR 32.33, 95% CI 6.05-172.66) remained significant. Median time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) was not reached after a median follow up of 30 months in patients undergoing successful CRC. Successful outcomes of IGBC are dependent on several factors. Diligent workup of suspicious thickening before simple cholecystectomy for gallstone disease and timely referral of IGBC to tertiary care are the keystones for good outcomes.

Outcomes of incidental versus non-incidental T2 gallbladder cancer: A single-institute experience of 425 cases

BACKGROUND

Up to 60% of incidentally detected gallbladder cancers (GBCs) have a primary stage of pathologic T2 stage (pT2), defined by invasion of the peri-adventitial tissue by the tumour, a plane breached during a simple cholecystectomy. This study assesses the impact of incidental detection of pT2 GBCs on survival outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of pT2 GBCs undergoing a curative resection was performed. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before an upfront radical resection were excluded. Outcomes of patients undergoing upfront surgery (uGBC) and incidentally detected tumours (iGBC) were compared.

RESULTS

From a total of 1356 patients, 425 patients with pT2 GBCs were included. Of these, 118 (27.7%) and 307 (72.23%) patients were in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively. Patients with iGBC had significantly higher locoregional, (62 [19.8%] vs. 11 [9.3%]; p = 0.009), liver, (36 [11.5%] vs. 4 [3.4%]; p = 0.01), and abdominal wall recurrences (23 [7.4%] vs. 1 [0.8%]; p = 0.009). Five-year disease free survival rates were 68.7% and 49.2% in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively (p = 0.013). Five-year overall survival rates were 71.7% and 64.6% in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively (p = 0.317).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidentally detected pT2 GBCs have significantly poorer outcomes compared to similarly staged patients undergoing an upfront radical cholecystectomy.

Is systematic histological examination of the cholecystectomy specimen always necessary?

INTRODUCTION

The histological examination (HE) of all cholecystectomy specimens removed for cholelithiasis is a widespread practice to rule out unrecognized gallbladder cancer. (GBC). But this dogmatic practice has been called into question by recent published data. The aim of this literature review was to answer two questions: (1) can HE be omitted in specific cases; (2) under what conditions is a selective strategy indicated?

METHODS

A review of the literature was carried out that included selected multicenter studies, registry studies, or meta-analyses. A reliable technique for the surgeon's macroscopic examination of the specimen would allow the selection of dubious cases for HE. The cost-effectiveness of selective HE was discussed. The PICO methodology (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) was used in the selection of articles that compared routine and selective histological examination.

RESULTS

If cases from countries with a high prevalence of gallbladder cancer are excluded and in the absence of high-risk situations (advanced age, female gender, calcified or porcelain gallbladder, acute cholecystitis, polyps, abnormalities noted intra-operatively), the macroscopic examination of the gallbladder in the operating room has a reliability approaching 100% in the majority of published studies. This would make it possible to omit systematic HE without compromising the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with unsuspected GBC and with a very favorable cost-effectiveness ratio.

CONCLUSION

Through a selection of patients at very low risk of incidentally-discovered cancer and a routine macroscopic examination of the opened gallbladder, the strategy of selective HE could prove useful in both clinical and economic terms.

Laparoscopic versus open oncological extended re-resection for incidental gallbladder adenocarcinoma: we can do more than T1/2

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic and open approaches have comparable safety and oncological efficacy to treat early (T1b or T2) stage incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC). However, their effects on T3 stage or above tumors unclear.

METHODS

Data of IGBC patients who underwent radical re-resection were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, surgical variables, and tumor characteristics were evaluated for association with survival.

RESULTS

We analyzed retrospectively 201 patients (72 men, 129 women; median age 63 years; range, 36-85 years). 84 underwent laparoscopic re-resection and 117 underwent open surgery. The 5-year OS post-resection was 74.7%, with a median survival of 74.52 months. The median OS (73.92 months vs. 77.04 months, P = 0.67), and disease-free survival (72.60 months vs. 71.09 months, P = 0.18) were comparable between the laparoscopic re-resection and open surgery groups. The survival of patients with T1/T2 (median: 85.50 months vs. 80.14 months; P = 0.67) and T3 (median: 68.56 months vs. 58.85 months; P = 0.36) disease were comparable between the open re-resection and laparoscopic re-resection groups even after PS matching. Open surgery group lost significantly more blood, while laparoscopic surgery took longer. The postsurgical stay in the laparoscopic re-resection group was significantly shorter. Combined extrahepatic bile duct resection, gallbladder perforation, pT, pStage, histological grade, microscopic liver invasion, status of the resected margin, and adjuvant therapy comprised significant independent prognostic indicators for IGBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic and open surgery can achieve similar short and long-term outcomes for T3 IGBC; however, careful surgical manipulation is necessary to avoid secondary injuries.

Timing of Elective Cholecystectomy After Acute Cholecystitis: A Population-based Register Study

BACKGROUND

Acute cholecystectomy is standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. However, many patients are still treated conservatively and undergo delayed elective surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the ideal time to perform an elective cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

All patients treated for acute cholecystitis in Sweden between 2006 and 2013 were identified through the Swedish Patient Register. This cohort was cross-linked with the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery, GallRiks, where information on surgical outcome was retrieved. The impact of the time interval after discharge from hospital to elective surgery was analysed by multivariate logistic regression adjusting for gender and age.

RESULTS

After exclusion of patients not subjected to surgery, not registered in GallRiks and patients treated with acute cholecystectomy, 8532 remained. This cohort was divided into six-time categories. Using the first time interval < 11 days from discharge to elective surgery as the reference category the chance of completing surgery with a minimally invasive technique was increased for all categories (p < 0.05). The risk for perioperative complication and cystic duct leakage was reduced if surgery was undertaken > 30 days after discharge (both p < 0.05). The risk for bile duct injury was significantly increased if the procedure was undertaken > 365 days after discharge (p = 0.030). The chance of completing the procedure within 100 min was not affected by time.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis, the safety of the procedure increases if surgery is performed more than 30 days after discharge from the primary admission.

Retrospective histopathologic findings of routine cholecystectomy specimens in a teaching hospital in North East India

Background

Cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgical operations performed worldwide. Limited data is available about the histopathological diagnoses of various gallbladder diseases in North Eastern part of India even though a higher incidence of gallbladder cancer has been reported from this part of the Country. Hence, a retrospective review of the histopathological findings of routine cholecystectomy specimens was done to assess the incidence of gallbladder cancer and other gallbladder pathologies.

Aims and Objective

To study the incidence of gallbladder cancer and other pathologic findings in routine cholecystectomy specimens.

Methodology

A retrospective study of the histopathological findings of cholecystectomy specimens with presumed benign gallbladder diseases who had undergone cholecystectomy from June 2013 till October 2021.

Results

A total of 1683 patients had undergone cholecystectomy during the study period. In total, 1354 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 339 patients underwent open cholecystectomy. Gallstones were present in 1631 patients. Chronic cholecystitis and cholesterosis were the most common histopathologic findings, followed by pyloric metaplasia. Unsuspected gallbladder cancer was detected in eight patients (0.48%).

Conclusion

Chronic cholecystitis was the most common histopathologic finding followed by pyloric metaplasia. Gallstones were found in most patients. Incidental gallbladder cancer was detected in 0.48% of patients.

Incidental Gallbladder Neoplasms: A Growing Global Burden

Background

The increasing trend of laparoscopic procedures has made cholecystectomies one of the most common surgical specimens received for histopathological evaluation. This has also led to an increasing trend of finding incidental gallbladder malignancies for a presumed benign disease. The present study describes the histopathological spectrum of neoplastic lesions of the gallbladder along with the historadiological correlation with special emphasis on incidental gallbladder carcinomas (IGBC).

Materials and methods

All the cholecystectomies received over a span of two and a half years were studied. Demographic details, imaging findings, gross features, and microscopic findings of premalignant and malignant lesions were noted. Special stains were done as and when required.

Results

Of the 1253 cholecystectomies received during the study period, 50 gallbladders (3.9%) showed neoplastic pathology and were included in the present study. The age range was 40 to 60 years with female predominance. Ultrasonography revealed nonspecific wall thickness in both premalignant and incidental gallbladder carcinomas. Gallstones were seen in 74% of the cases (37/50). Gross and imaging findings in 17 (34%) of the malignant cases were in concordance with microscopic features, whereas the dysplastic lesions (21) and IGBC cases showed evidence of chronic cholecystitis on the same. Microscopic examination revealed focal dysplasia (low and high grade) in 21/50 (42%) cases. Invasive malignancy was seen in 28/50 (56%) of the cases, of which 11 cases (22%) were IGBC. Pancreaticobiliary type of adenocarcinoma was the most common morphology seen in almost all the cases. There was also one case each of intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) and carcinosarcoma.

Conclusion

GBC is an unusual malignancy and its preoperative diagnosis is not so definitive. The incidental form of GBC presents as a radiological disguise and a histopathological surprise. Hence, the present study warrants a complete and scrupulous histopathological examination of all the cholecystectomy specimens for proper and further management of the case.

Incidental gallbladder cancer: a retrospective clinical study of 40 cases

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Gallbladder cancer who is really cured?

BACKGROUND

Although gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is characterized by a dismal prognosis, there is a proportion of patients who are cured. The aim of this study was to analyze the profile of these patients.

METHODS

A database was queried for patients who underwent curative resection with a follow-up of at least 5 years. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team. A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with long-term survival.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 2013, 461 patients were evaluated and 112 who underwent resection were analyzed. Among the patients, five year survival was 57% while lymph node and liver compromise were the only independent factors associated with survival. On the other hand, the elapsed time between the cholecystectomy and the resection, the differentiation grade and the level of wall invasion did not have an independent effect on the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite its poor prognosis, a subset of patients can be cured of GBCA. R0 resection of patients without lymph and liver infiltration are key to GBCA survival.

Incidental Gallbladder Carcinoma in North Indian Population: Importance of Routine Histopathological Examination of All Benign Gallbladder Specimens

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of incidental gallbladder carcinoma in specimens of cholecystectomy performed for benign gallbladder diseases and to establish the utility of routine histopathological examination of all gallbladder specimens obtained following cholecystectomy done for benign diseases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 This was a hospital-based three years prospective and retrospective study done at a tertiary care centre in North India. Gallbladder specimens from laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies done for benign gallbladder diseases without any clinico-radiological evidence of malignancy were included in the study. Routine histopathological evaluation of 1,268 such gallbladder specimens was carried out to get the incidence of incidental gallbladder carcinoma and pathological staging of carcinoma was done according to American Joint Committee recommendations for cancer staging (AJCC). All the diagnosed cases of Incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC) were analysed in terms of demographics, radiology findings, and gross and microscopic pathology findings.

RESULTS

Out of 1,268 gallbladder specimens of clinically benign diseases, 16 cases (1.26%) were diagnosed as cases of IGBC with female predominance with a male to female ratio of 1:7. Mean gallbladder thickness in these cases was 0.77±0.20 cm, and 98.30% cases of IGBC were associated with gall stone disease. However, no correlation was observed between the age, gallbladder thickness and pathological stages of these IGBC.

CONCLUSION

 IGBC is an occult disastrous malignancy of the gallbladder, which can be missed in the pre and intraoperative periods despite careful clinical and radiological evaluation and comes as a surprise for pathologists the first time. We recommend that all specimens of gallbladder obtained from its surgical resection for benign diseases should be subjected to histopathological examination.

Establishing consensus on the perioperative management of cholecystectomy in public hospitals: a Delphi study with an expert panel in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Several guidelines have put forward recommendations about the perioperative process of cholecystectomy. Despite the recommendations, controversy remains concerning several topics, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to develop uniform recommendations for perioperative practices in cholecystectomy in Mexico to standardize this process and save public health system resources.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used. An expert panel of 23 surgeons anonymously completed two rounds of responses to a 29-item questionnaire with 110 possible answers. The consensus was assessed using the percentage of responders agreeing on each question.

RESULTS

From the 29 questions, the study generated 27 recommendations based on 20 (69.0%) questions reaching consensus, one that was considered uncertain (3.4%), and six (20.7%) items that remained open questions. In two (6.9%) cases, no consensus was reached, and no recommendation could be made.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides recommendations for the perioperative management of cholecystectomy in public hospitals in Mexico. As a guide for public institutions in low- and middle-income countries, the study identifies recommendations for perioperative tests and evaluations, perioperative decision making, postoperative interventions and institutional investment, that might ensure the safe practice of cholecystectomy and contribute to conserving resources.

Malignancy in elective cholecystectomy due to gallbladder polyps or thickened gallbladder wall: a single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder cancer is a rare but aggressive malignancy. Surgical resection is recommended for gallbladder polyps ≥10 mm. For gallbladder wall thickening, resection is recommended if malignancy cannot be excluded. The incidence of gallbladder malignancy after cholecystectomy with indications of polyps or wall thickening in the Swedish population is not known.

MATERIAL/METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at Linköping University Hospital and included patients who underwent cholecystectomy 2010 - 2018. All cholecystectomies performed due to gallbladder polyps or gallbladder wall thickening without other preoperative malignant signs were identified. Preoperative radiological examinations were re-analysed by a single radiologist. Medical records and histopathology reports were analysed.

RESULTS

In all, 102 patients were included, of whom 65 were diagnosed with gallbladder polyps and 37 with gallbladder wall thickening. In each group, one patient (1.5% and 2.7% in each group) had gallbladder malignancy ≥ pT1b.Two (3.1%) and three (8.1%) patients with gallbladder malignancy < T1b were identified in each group.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the incidence of malignancy is low without other malignant signs beyond gallbladder polyps and/or gallbladder wall thickening. We propose that these patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumour board. If the polyp is 10-15 mm or if the gallbladder wall is thickened but no other malignant signs are observed, cholecystectomy can be safely performed by an experienced general surgeon at a general surgery unit. If the histopathology indicates ≥ pT1b, the patient should be referred immediately to a hepatobiliary centre for liver and lymph node resection.

Selective or Routine Histology of Cholecystectomy Specimens for Diagnosing Incidental Carcinoma of Gallbladder and Correlation with Careful Intraoperative Macroscopic Examination? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Selective or Routine histology of cholecystectomy specimens for benign gallbladder disease has always been a matter of debate because of the low prevalence and bad prognosis associated with gall bladder carcinoma. The objective of this study is to ascertain whether selective histology can be preferred over Routine histology without any harm.

METHODS

This systematic review is conducted according to PRISMA's checklist; relevant articles were searched in the database until September 1 2020 in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases, manually, with search queries and without date restrictions. Studies included in this systematic review involved patients who underwent cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease and were diagnosed with gallbladder carcinoma incidentally either after selective or routine histology of the gallbladder.

RESULTS

A total of 24 routine or selective histology recommending studies were selected for the systematic review after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies comprised 77,213 numbers of patients and 486 numbers of Malignancies. These studies correlate the number of IGBC diagnosed histologically with the number of IGBC's that were suspected by the surgeons intraoperative by macroscopy. Routine recommending studies show a significant number of IGBC diagnosed histologically as missed by surgeons whereas the selective recommending studies show most of the histologically diagnosed IGBC already suspected by the surgeons intraoperative. When comparing the macroscopic details of the IGBC's between routine and selective studies, we found that there was significant overlap. Most of the findings missed by the surgeons as suspicious in routine studies were suspected by the surgeons involved in selective histology recommending studies. Thereby, favouring selective histology and emphasizing the need for careful intraoperative macroscopy for suspecting IGBC.

CONCLUSION

Selective Histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens can be preferred if a careful intraoperative macroscopic examination is done and patient risk factors are taken into consideration.

Routine examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: a single-centre analysis of the incidence, clinical and histopathological aspects of incidental gallbladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder carcinoma is often found incidentally on histopathologic examination after cholecystectomy-this is referred as incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGC). Routine vs selective histopathological assessment of gallbladders is under debate and this study evaluates the role of regular specimens' examination, based on a single-centre analysis of incidence, clinical and histopathological aspects of IGC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cholecystectomy, between July 2010 and January 2020, were considered. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 and preoperative diagnosis of GB carcinoma. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data were retrospectively collected, continuous variables with a normal distribution were evaluated with Student's t-test and ANOVA.

RESULTS

Some 5779 patients were included. The female/male ratio was 2.5:1. Chronic cholecystitis (CC) was the most common finding on specimens (99.3%), IGC was found in six cases (0.1%). In the latter group, there were 5 women and patients were older than those with benign disease-73.7 [Formula: see text] 5.38 years vs 55.8 [Formula: see text] 0.79 years (p < 0.05). In all the cases, the GB was abnormal on intraoperative inspection and beside cancer, histopathology showed associated CC and/or dysplasia. Upon diagnosis, disease was at advanced stage-one stage II, one stage IIIA, one stage IIIB, three stage IVA. Two patients are alive, three died of disease progression-median survival was 7 months (range 2-14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, ICG was rare, occurred most commonly in old adult women and was diagnosed at an advanced stage. In all the cases, the GB was abnormal intraoperatively, therefore macroscopic GB anomalies demand histopathological assessment of the specimen.

A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Purpose

Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.

Results

Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.

Method for adequate macroscopic gallbladder examination after cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is no clear guideline nor protocol for macroscopic examination of the gallbladder, leaving surgeons extemporaneous in regard of gallbladder examination in selective histopathologic policy. The purpose of this article is to describe a surgical approach for adequate macroscopic inspection of the gallbladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The described practical method was developed in collaboration between surgeons and pathologists. This method was introduced in 2011 and implemented in 2012. We retrospectively reviewed the number of cholecystectomies and number of histopathologic examinations between 2006 and 2017, using our own patient database. We used the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) to examine the incidence of gallbladder cancer patients before and after implementation of the selective policy in our hospital. In addition to the method, we depict several frequent macroscopic abnormalities in order to provide some examples for surgical colleagues.

RESULTS

Since implementation of the selective policy, 2271 surgical macroscopic gallbladder examinations were performed. As a result, we observed a significant decrease from 83% in 2012 to 38% in 2017, in histopathologic examination of the gallbladder following cholecystectomy. We observed a stable trend of gallbladder carcinoma in the same period (0.17%, n = 4 during 2006-2011 and 0.26%, n = 6 during 2012-2017).

CONCLUSION

A simple, valid and easy method is described for future macroscopic analysis by the surgeon following a cholecystectomy.

Port-site metastasis of unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma with ossification after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma (UGC) refers to cholecystectomy due to benign gallbladder disease, which is pathologically confirmed as gallbladder cancer during or after surgery. Port-site metastasis (PSM) of UGC following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is rare, especially after several years.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old man presenting with acute cholecystitis and gallstones was treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in July 2008. Histological analysis revealed unexpected papillary adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with gallstones, which indicated that the tumor had spread to the muscular space (pT1b). Radical resection of gallbladder carcinoma was performed 10 d later. In January 2018, the patient was admitted to our hospital for a mass in the upper abdominal wall after surgery for gallbladder cancer 10 years ago. Laparoscopic exploration and complete resection of the abdominal wall tumor were successfully performed. Pathological diagnosis showed metastatic or invasive, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in fibrous tissue with massive ossification. Immuno-histochemistry and medical history were consistent with invasion or metastasis of gallbladder carcinoma. His general condition was well at follow-up of 31 mo. No recurrence was found by ultrasound and epigastric enhanced computed tomography.

CONCLUSION

PSM of gallbladder cancer is often accompanied by peritoneal metastasis, which indicates poor prognosis. Once PSM occurs after surgery, laparoscopic exploration is recommended to rule out abdominal metastasis to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of gallbladder histopathology after cholecystectomy for benign disease

Background

The prevalence of incidental gallbladder cancer is low when performing cholecystectomy for benign disease. The performance of routine or selective histological examination of the gallbladder is still a subject for discussion. The aim of this study was to assess the cost‐effectiveness of these different approaches.

Methods

Four management strategies were evaluated using decision‐analytical modelling: no histology, current selective histology as practised in Sweden, macroscopic selective histology, and routine histology. Healthcare costs and life‐years were estimated for a lifetime perspective and combined into incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to assess the additional cost of achieving an additional life‐year for each management strategy.

Results

In the analysis of the four strategies, current selective histology was ruled out due to a higher ICER compared with macroscopic selective histology, which showed better health outcomes (extended dominance). Comparison of routine histology with macroscopic selective histology resulted in a gain of 12 life‐years and an incremental healthcare cost of approximately €1 000 000 in a cohort of 10 000 patients, yielding an estimated ICER of €76 508. When comparing a macroscopic selective strategy with no histological assessment, 50 life‐years would be saved and the ICER was estimated to be €20 708 in a cohort of 10 000 patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Conclusion

A macroscopic selective strategy appears to be the most cost‐effective approach.

BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON INCIDENTAL GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA

Background:

Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable disease. However, some questions related to their management remain controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis.

Aim:

To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil.

Methods:

Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel for agreement assessment.

Results:

Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available. Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended routinely.

Conclusions:

It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work of digestive and general surgeons.

Incidental Carcinoma after Cholecystectomy for Benign Disease of the Gallbladder: A Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to determine the incidence and the prognosis of incidental carcinoma of the gallbladder (IGBC) after cholecystectomy through a meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included 51 studies and 436,636 patients with cholecystectomy. The incidence rate of IGBC after cholecystectomy was 0.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5%-0.8%). The incidence rate of recent studies was not significantly different from those of past studies. The mean age and female ratio of the IGBC subgroup were not significantly different from those of the overall patient group. The estimated rates of IGBC were 13.0%, 34.1%, 39.7%, 22.7%, and 12.5% in the pTis, pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 stages, respectively. Patients with IGBC had a favorable overall survival rate compared to patients with non-IGBC (hazard ratio (HR) 0.574, 95% CI 0.445-0.739). However, there was no significant difference of disease-free survival between the IGBC and non-IGBC subgroups (HR 0.931, 95% CI 0.618-1.402). IGBC was found in 0.6% of patients with cholecystectomy. The prognosis of patients with IGBC was favorable compared to those with non-IGBC. In the pathologic examination after cholecystectomy for benign diseases, a sufficient examination for histology should be guaranteed to detect IGBC.

Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease

Background

Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed.

Methods

Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of re-resected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3–68.8) in re-resected patients (p < 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent re-resection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Predictive factors for the presence of RD were pT3 stage (HR 25.3; p = 0.003) and pN1 stage (HR 23.0; p = 0.022).

Conclusion

Re-resection for iGBC is associated with improved survival but remains infrequently used and is often performed after the optimal timing interval. RD is the only significant prognostic factor for survival after re-resection and can be predicted by pT and pN stages.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Management of incidental gallbladder cancer in a national cohort

Background

Incidental gallbladder cancer is a rare event, and its prognosis is largely affected by the tumour stage and treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse the management, treatment and survival of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in a national cohort over a decade.

Methods

Patients were identified through the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks). Data were cross-linked to the national registry for liver surgery (SweLiv) and the Cancer Registry. Medical records were collected if registry data were missing. Survival was measured as disease-specific survival. The study was divided into two intervals (2007–2011 and 2012–2016) to evaluate changes over time.

Results

In total, 249 patients were identified with incidental gallbladder cancer, of whom 92 (36·9 per cent) underwent re-resection with curative intent. For patients with pT2 and pT3 disease, median disease-specific survival improved after re-resection (12·4 versus 44·1 months for pT2, and 9·7 versus 23·0 months for pT3). Residual disease was present in 53 per cent of patients with pT2 tumours who underwent re-resection; these patients had a median disease-specific survival of 32·2 months, whereas the median was not reached in patients without residual disease. Median survival increased by 11 months for all patients between the early and late periods (P = 0·030).

Conclusion

Re-resection of pT2 and pT3 incidental gallbladder cancer was associated with improved survival, but survival was impaired when residual disease was present. A higher re-resection rate and more R0 resections in the later time period may have been associated with improved survival.

Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of T2 gallbladder carcinoma is pivotal to improvement in the overall prognosis for this disease

Since the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) subdivided the T2 stage of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) into T2a and T2b, the diagnosis and treatment of those stages have been a subject of heated discussion and controversy. T2 is a stage of GBC that might be treatable. Based on the extent of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis, T2 GBC can be classified into various pathological stages such as IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVB, leading to controversy in clinical settings. This review aims to discuss the effectiveness of and controversies concerning S4b+5 resection, the acceptable extent of lymph node dissection, the timing for treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer, and adjuvant therapy. This review also aims to suggest directions for and recommendations regarding clinical research in the future.

Systematic review of management of incidental gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer is rare, but cancers detected incidentally after cholecystectomy are increasing. The aim of this study was to review the available data for current best practice for optimal management of incidental gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

A systematic PubMed search of the English literature to May 2018 was conducted.

RESULTS

The search identified 12 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in addition to several consensus reports, multi-institutional series and national audits. Some 0·25-0·89 per cent of all cholecystectomy specimens had incidental gallbladder cancer on pathological examination. Most patients were staged with pT2 (about half) or pT1 (about one-third) cancers. Patients with cancers confined to the mucosa (T1a or less) had 5-year survival rates of up to 100 per cent after cholecystectomy alone. For cancers invading the muscle layer of the gallbladder wall (T1b or above), reresection is recommended. The type, extent and timing of reresection remain controversial. Observation time may be used for new cross-sectional imaging with CT and MRI. Perforation at initial surgery had a higher risk of disease dissemination. Gallbladder cancers are PET-avid, and PET may detect residual disease and thus prevent unnecessary surgery. Routine laparoscopic staging before reresection is not warranted for all stages. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis increases with each T category. The incidence of port-site metastases is about 10 per cent. Routine resection of port sites has no effect on survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly documented and probably underused.

CONCLUSION

Management of incidental gallbladder cancer continues to evolve, with more refined suggestions for subgroups at risk and a selective approach to reresection.

Routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: Is it time to change the current practice?

Objectives

Routine histopathological examination of all gallbladder specimens, regardless of the clinical characteristics of the patient or macroscopic aspect of the gallbladder, is the current approach to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to assess whether or not it would be safe to adopt a policy of processing only gallbladder specimens with preoperative or intraoperative suspicion for malignancy without compromising patient safety.

Material and Methods

From January 2009 to June 2017, all histopathology reports of 3423 consecutive gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency cholecystectomies were retrospectively analyzed in two university hospitals.

Results

A total of 3423 gallbladder specimens submitted for histopathological examination during the study period were included into the study. The results of histopathological examination of these gallbladder specimens showed that chronic cholecystitis was found in 2792 (81.6%), acute cholecystitis in 237 (6.9%), and cholesterolosis in 223 (6.5%) patients. Dysplasia was found in 5 (0.14%) patients, and gallbladder carcinoma was detected in 4 (0.11%) patients. All patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed either preoperatively or intraoperatively, and none of the patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed from the histopathological examination.

Conclusion

A strategy of selective approach for histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens may be safe in areas with very low incidence of gallbladder carcinoma. Such selective strategy is more cost-effective, reduces the workload of pathologists, and does not appear to compromise patient outcome.

Histopathological findings in cholecystectomies specimens: A single institution study of 20 584 cases

BACKGROUND

The histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens has not been standardized with a debate concerning the routine and the selective approach. The aim of this study was to assess the information obtained from routine histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens.

METHODS

All histopathological reports of cholecystectomy specimens between January 2003 and December 2016 were analyzed, including a clinical diagnosis of benign gallstone disease or cholecystitis.

RESULTS

A total of 20,584 reports were examined. The mean age of patients was 54.2 years. Patients aged more than 60 years represent 37.6% of the study population. Of all patients, 15,973 (77.6%) were females. Incidental gallbladder cancers (GBC) were present in 155 cholecystectomies specimens (0.8%). 67.1% of GBC are at T2 and T3 stage. Granulomatous cholecystitis was diagnosed in only 19 cases (0.1%). GBC were more prevalent in older patients (P < 10^-6) and cholesterolosis was more prevalent in young patients (P < 10^-6). There was no gender predilection for GBC (P = 0.739).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of incidental gallbladder carcinoma in our study is low, yet, we found a higher proportion of T2 and T3 carcinomas stage. Granulomatous cholecystitis may need further investigations and treatments. When a selective approch of histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens is used, it is important to take into account that clinical parameters are significantly associated with gallbladder cancer.