The Surgical Strategy in Massive Corrosive Injury in Digestive Tract: Is the Extensive Surgery Appropriate?

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing emergency surgery for corrosive injury of the upper digestive tract

PURPOSE

Emergency surgery can save patients' lives in cases of severe caustic injury. However, the long-term outcomes are not well understood.

METHODS

Patients who underwent emergency organ resection for severe corrosive acid injury were included. Subsequently, digestive tract reconstruction was performed to fit patients. Long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent emergency digestive tract resection. The operative mortality rate was 6% (of 3/50). One of the 50 patients underwent successful immediate reconstruction. Of the 46 survivors with digestive tract discontinuity, 32 (70%) underwent subsequent reconstructive surgery, 10 (22%) died while awaiting reconstruction due to deterioration in their psychiatric and nutritional status, and 4 (9%) were unfit for reconstructive surgery. No operative mortality occurred during reconstruction. Among the 32 patients who underwent reconstruction, 30 (94%) achieved nutritional autonomy. Nutritional independence was achieved in 62% of the patients (31/50). At a median duration of 58 months, the median survival time of the 50 patients was 158 months. Patients who underwent reconstruction had a significantly better overall survival than those who did not (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgery remains the standard treatment for corrosive ingestion of complicated digestive tract injuries. However, only 60% of survivors can undergo subsequent digestive reconstruction and achieve long-term nutritional autonomy and a survival outcome.

Short-term and long-term management of caustic-induced gastrointestinal injury: An evidence-based practice guidelines

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology has developed an evidence-based practice guideline for the management of caustic ingestion-related gastrointestinal (GI) injuries. A modified Delphi process was used to arrive at this consensus containing 41 statements. These statements were generated after two rounds of electronic voting, one round of physical meeting, and extensive review of the available literature. The exact prevalence of caustic injury and ingestion in developing countries is not known, though it appears to be of significant magnitude to pose a public health problem. The extent and severity of this preventable injury to the GI tract determine the short and long-term outcomes. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the preferred initial approach for the evaluation of injury and contrast-enhanced computed tomography is reserved only for specific situations. Low-grade injuries (Zargar grade ≤ 2a) have shown better outcomes with early oral feeding and discharge from hospital. However, patients with high-grade injury (Zargar grade ≥ 2b) require hospitalization as they are at a higher risk for both short and long-term complications, including luminal narrowing. These strictures can be managed endoscopically or surgically depending on the anatomy and extent of stricture, expertise available and patients' preferences. Nutritional support all along is crucial for all these patients until nutritional autonomy is established.

Emergency surgical intervention in acute corrosive ingestion: single-center experience from India

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention for acute corrosive injury is often required. It is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Sparce data is available on the types and timing of surgery after acute corrosive ingestion and complications associated with the same.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study from a tertiary care center in India. All patients who underwent surgical exploration after acute corrosive intake between January 2003 and June 2014 were enrolled in the study. Data on patients' presentation, their endoscopic findings, indications of surgery, type of surgery and post-operative follow-up was retrieved.

RESULTS

Out of 170 patients who presented with acute corrosive ingestion, 24 patients (14.11%) required emergency surgery. The mean interval between ingestion and surgery was 9.92 ± 9.03 days. Presence of peritonitis was the most common indication for surgery (n = 10; 41.7%) followed by mediastinitis (n = 7; 29.2%). A total of 17 resectional and 7 non-resectional procedures were performed. Thirteen (54%) patients succumbed to their illness post-operatively due to multi-organ failure (n = 9), refractory shock (n = 3) or pulmonary thromboembolism (n = 1). Patients with early surgery (≤7 days) after corrosive ingestion had similar mortality compared to patients with late surgery (>7 days) (50% versus 67%; P = 0.30). Of the 11 surviving patients, eight patients (72%) underwent successful reconstructive surgery on follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgery after corrosive ingestion carries high morbidity and mortality. However, after the initial stormy acute phase, majority of patients can undergo successful reconstructive surgery on follow-up.

Assessment and management after corrosive ingestion: when is specialist centre referral needed? A 10-year UK experience

BACKGROUND

Corrosive ingestion injuries are rare but clinically significant events, potentially associated with high morbidity and mortality. The low volume of cases limits guideline development. We report a 10-year experience of our tertiary centre focusing on cases requiring specialist care.

METHODS

All adults treated following corrosive ingestion between 2010 and 2020 were included. Blood results, imaging and endoscopic findings were reviewed. Patients were stratified based on endoscopic findings. Emergency and delayed management was analysed along with short and long-term outcomes. Predictive value of early outcome indicators was investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included, with an average follow-up of 5 years. Patients with injuries ≤ Zargar 2A (n = 15) had long-term outcomes similar to the ones with negative endoscopic findings (n = 51). All fifteen patients suffering injuries Zargar ≥ 2B required ITU and four died (26.6%). All deaths occurred within 50 days of ingestion, had Zargar grade ≥ 3 and airway involvement. Five patients (33%) required emergency operations, two of which died. All Zargar ≥ 2B injury survivors (n = 11) developed strictures and/or tracheo-esophageal fistulae (18%), required multiple admissions and prolonged nutritional support; five required delayed resections. Zargar grade ≥ 2B, airway damage, and increased CRP on admission correlated with unfavourable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Corrosive ingestion injuries up to Zargar 2A do not cause long-term sequelae and can be managed locally. Injuries > 2B bear high mortality and will cause sequelae. Early identification of severe injuries and transfer to specialist centres with multidisciplinary ITU, OG, thoracic and ENT expertise is recommended.

Salvage multivisceral abdominal surgery after caustic ingestion: Case report

•

Caustic ingestion represents a drama for patients and doctors.

•

Emergency treatment is hard and needs experienced team.

•

Despite is mainly related to suicide attempt our goal is to guarantee the patient’s survival.

•

This report represents a prompt management with II step reconstruction.

•

Multi-disciplinary approach with high competency represents the only possibility to manage a so complex situation.

Introduction

Ingestion of caustic substances is a life-threatening medical emergency with high morbidity and mortality rate.

Case report

We present a case report of young patient who presents to our department secondary to ingestion of caustic substances was submitted to multi-visceral resection surgery having saved his life after a long and complex multidisciplinary management.

Conclusion

An aggressive surgical approach allows successful initial treatment of extended caustic injuries. Early surgical treatment is essential to improve the prognosis in these patients and refer the patient to large and experienced hospital represents the main goal to guarantee a surviving chance.

Corrosive substances ingestion: a review

Corrosive chemical substance ingestions are a major problem, especially in developing countries, but also in developed countries such as the United States, France, and Belgium. Ingestions may be deliberate as suicide attempts (mostly in adolescents and adults) or accidental (mostly in children). The results can be devastating in terms of individual suffering and disability, but also in terms of resource utilization and costs. In developing countries, outcomes may be worse because of limited medical/surgical resources. Common sequelae include gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, stomach, pylorus, and duodenum) stricture formation, GI tract perforation, and hemorrhage. Systemic effects may also occur, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi-organ system failure, and sepsis. Various interventions in the acute phase to reduce the severity of injury have been attempted, but there are no large controlled clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy. Dilation therapy in various forms is commonly used for the treatment of strictures and a variety of surgical procedures including esophagectomy and delayed replacement may be required in severe corrosive injury cases.