Appropriate Source Control and Antifungal Therapy are Associated with Improved Survival in Critically Ill Surgical Patients with Intra-abdominal Candidiasis

Candidemia in ICU Patients: What Are the Real Game-Changers for Survival?

Candidemia infection remains a critical challenge in intensive care units (ICUs), with high morbidity and mortality rates despite advances in therapeutic practices. This multicenter prospective surveillance study assessed the epidemiology, clinical management, and mortality predictors of candidemia in critically ill patients across two periods (2010-2012 and 2017-2018) in 11 tertiary hospitals in Brazil. Among 314 ICU patients with candidemia, the overall mortality rate was 60.2%, with no significant reduction over time (58.8% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.721). Candida albicans was the predominant pathogen (43.6%), followed by C. tropicalis (20%) and C. glabrata (13.7%). The use of echinocandins increased significantly in the second period (21.1% to 41.7%, p < 0.001); however, 70% of patients still did not receive these agents as first-line therapy. Catheter removal due to candidemia was performed in only 52.1% of cases but was associated with improved 30-day survival (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified cancer, inadequate treatment, and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of mortality. Our findings underscore persistent gaps in adherence to guidelines, particularly regarding timely echinocandin initiation and catheter removal. Strengthening therapeutic strategies focused on these key interventions is essential to improving outcomes for ICU patients with candidemia.

Enhancing ascitic fungal infection diagnosis through next-generation sequencing: a pilot study in surgical ICU patients

Objectives

Ascites, often associated with critical pathologies such as liver cirrhosis or bowel perforation, can be complicated by fungal infection, increasing mortality especially in intensive care settings and demanding rapid diagnosis and adequate treatment. Traditional microbiological diagnostic methods have limited sensitivity in accurately identifying fungal pathogens in ascitic fluid. Alternative diagnostic methods may offer important insights to enable guiding of antifungal therapy and refining empirical treatment strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of next-generation sequencing methods to identify specific fungal pathogens responsible for ascitic fluid infections.

Methods

We prospectively collected 50 ascitic fluid samples from ICU patients with suspected ascites infection. In addition to standard culture-based microbiological testing, an ascitic fluid aliquot underwent fungal DNA isolation and was analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods for identification of fungal species.

Results

Of 50 ascitic samples collected, five samples showed growth of Candida spp. in culture. After DNA isolation and ITS2 PCR, detectable amplification was achieved in 10 samples. Sequencing of the 50 patients' samples identified facultative pathogenic fungi in 19 patients. In 15 cases, culture alone would not have permitted the identification of all facultative pathogenic fungi. The identification of fungal DNA by sequencing was significantly associated with poor patient outcome and a number of clinical parameters.

Conclusions

Our results show a higher sensitivity for NGS-based diagnostic methods in the identification of ascitic fluid fungal infections compared to culture-based diagnostics. This may be beneficial especially for patients in a critical care setting, who have an increased prevalence of comorbidities and high mortality. The implementation of such methods in standard diagnosis will require increased standardization of the workflows and interpretation of the sequencing results with respect to patients' clinical picture.

Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Cancer Patients: A 10-Year Experience in a Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

Invasive candidiasis (IC) represents a significant threat to both mortality and morbidity, especially among vulnerable populations. Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) frequently occurs in critically ill and cancer patients, with these specific groups carrying a heightened risk for such invasive fungal infections. Despite this, there is a noticeable lack of attention to IAC in cancer patients within the literature, highlighting a critical gap that requires urgent consideration.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of IAC and identify prognostic factors in a cancer centre in a middle-income country over 10 years.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A retrospective cohort observational study of adults diagnosed with IAC was conducted at the Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), a tertiary hospital specialising in oncological diseases with 499 beds, including 85 intensive care unit (ICU) beds, from December 2009 through May 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 128 episodes were included: 67.2% admitted to the ICU; 54.7% males; and median age 62 years. The predominant diagnosis was peritonitis (75.8%). Blood culture samples were collected from 128 patients upon admission, revealing candidemia in 17.2% (22). The most frequently isolated were C. albicans (n = 65, 50.8%) and C. glabrata (n = 42, 32.8%). Antifungal treatment was administered to 91 (71%) patients, with fluconazole (64.8%) and echinocandins (23.4%) being the most common choices. A significant proportion of these patients had a history of abdominal surgery or antibiotic use. Independent factors associated with 30-day mortality included the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 6 (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.094-1.562, p = 0.003), days of treatment (median 10.5) (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.870-0.993, p = 0.031) and abdominal source control (78.1%) (OR = 0.148, 95% CI 0.030-0.719, p = 0.018). The 30-day mortality rate was 41.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the critical importance of implementing effective source control as a key strategy for reducing mortality in IAC.

Should Preventive Antifungal Treatment Be Given to Patients With Abdominal Contamination in the Intensive Care Unit?

Background Intra-abdominal contamination is a critical risk factor for candidemia. Because of the high mortality of candidemia and delayed results of cultures, preventive antifungal (AF) treatment can be administered. Especially in the intensive care unit (ICU), it may be necessary to determine the preventive AF approach due to the poor clinical condition of the patients. However, this practice is not standard among clinicians, and it is controversial whether it is beneficial or not. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different AF treatment approaches (prophylactic, empirical, and culture-directed) on mortality, development of candidemia, and length of hospital stay in these patients. The primary outcome of the study was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the development of candidemia and length of hospital stay. Methodology This is a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Adult patients who were hospitalized in the ICU with the diagnosis of intra-abdominal contamination between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, were reviewed retrospectively from electronic hospital records and Infectious Diseases ICU patient follow-up forms. Age, gender, comorbid diseases, the reason for hospitalization, history of surgical operation, surgical procedure type, length of hospital stay, culture results of blood and intraoperative intra-abdominal samples (pus, peritoneal fluid, abscess), type of AF agents, and mortality status of the patients were recorded. Furthermore, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, procalcitonin (PCT) level, and serum albumin levels in blood samples taken on three different days (the day of diagnosis, the day of operation, and the day of candidemia) were examined. The patients were grouped as without AF, receiving prophylactic AF, receiving empirical AF, and receiving culture-directed AF. Additionally, the study population was evaluated by dividing it into two groups, namely, those who developed candidemia and those who did not. The patients were evaluated regarding the development of candidemia, AF treatment approach, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Results A total of 196 patients were included in the study. Candidemia was determined in 31.6% of the patients. Candidemia was more common in patients with a history of previous surgery and presenting with acute abdominal pain than other causes. It was determined that 70% of the patients who developed candidemia had perforation, with the most common being colonic perforation. The hospital stay was longer in patients with candidemia than without candidemia (47.9 vs. 22.4 days; p < 0.001). When empirical and prophylactic AF recipients were compared, there was no difference in mortality and length of hospital stay. Prolongation of the time to empirical treatment after perforation/leak was associated with increased candidemia (p = 0.004). Furthermore, patients with a waiting time of ≥4.5 days until surgical operation were at a higher risk of developing candidemia. Conclusions Although the study did not demonstrate a difference in terms of reducing mortality, it was concluded that preventive AF therapy can be administered to reduce the risk of candidemia and hospitalization duration, especially in patients with a history of previous surgical operations and abdominal contamination with a prolonged waiting period until the surgical operation.

Detection of Candida DNA in peritoneal fluids by PCR assay optimizing the diagnosis and treatment for intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk ICU patients: A prospective cohort study

Background

Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is the predominant type of invasive candidiasis with high mortality in critically ill patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detecting Candida DNA in peritoneal fluids (PF) is useful in diagnosing and management of IAC in high-risk patients in intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

A prospective single-center cohort study of surgical patients at high risk for IAC was conducted in the ICU. PF was collected from the abdominal drainage tubes (within 24 h) or by percutaneous puncture. Direct PF smear microscopy, PF culture, blood culture, and serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan were performed in all patients. For Candida PCR assay, the ITS1/ITS4 primers that targeted the ITS1-5.8 s-ITS2 regions were used for PCR, and sequencing analysis was used to identify the pathogen at the species level. IAC was defined according to the 2013 European consensus criteria.

Results

Among 83 patients at high risk for IAC, the IAC criteria were present in 17 (20.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of the Candida PCR assay were 64.7 and 89.4%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63-0.91). In this cohort, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 90.8% (95% CI: 80.3-96.2%) and 61.1% (95% CI: 36.1-81.7%), respectively. Diagnostic consistency was moderate (kappa 0.529, p < 0.001) according to the 2013 European consensus criteria.

Conclusion

Detection of Candida DNA in PF using PCR can be considered an adjunct to existing routine diagnostic tools which may optimize the diagnosis and antifungal treatment of IAC in high-risk patients in the ICU.

Risk Factors for Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Intensive Care Units: Results from EUCANDICU Study

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal infections represent the second most frequently acquired infection in the intensive care unit (ICU), with mortality rates ranging from 20% to 50%. Candida spp. may be responsible for up to 10-30% of cases. This study assesses risk factors for development of intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) among patients admitted to ICU.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study in 26 European ICUs during the period January 2015-December 2016. Patients at least 18 years old who developed an episode of microbiologically documented IAC during their stay in the ICU (at least 48 h after admission) served as the case cohort. The control group consisted of adult patients who did not develop episodes of IAC during ICU admission. Matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1 according to time at risk (i.e. controls had to have at least the same length of ICU stay as their matched cases prior to IAC onset), ICU ward and period of study.

RESULTS

During the study period, 101 case patients with a diagnosis of IAC were included in the study. On univariate analysis, severe hepatic failure, prior receipt of antibiotics, prior receipt of parenteral nutrition, abdominal drain, prior bacterial infection, anastomotic leakage, recurrent gastrointestinal perforation, prior receipt of antifungal drugs and higher median number of abdominal surgical interventions were associated with IAC development. On multivariate analysis, recurrent gastrointestinal perforation (OR 13.90; 95% CI 2.65-72.82, p = 0.002), anastomotic leakage (OR 6.61; 95% CI 1.98-21.99, p = 0.002), abdominal drain (OR 6.58; 95% CI 1.73-25.06, p = 0.006), prior receipt of antifungal drugs (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.04-17.46, p = 0.04) or antibiotics (OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.32-10.52, p = 0.01) were independently associated with IAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal perforation, anastomotic leakage, abdominal drain and prior receipt of antifungals or antibiotics may help to identify critically ill patients with higher probability of developing IAC. Prospective studies are needed to identify which patients will benefit from early antifungal treatment.