1
|
Collie BL, Lyons NB, O'Neil CF, Ramsey WA, Lineen EB, Schulman CI, Proctor KG, Meizoso JP, Namias N, Ginzburg E. When is it safe to start thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization? Surgery 2024; 175:1418-1423. [PMID: 38418296 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thromboprophylaxis after blunt splenic trauma is complicated by the risk of bleeding, but the risk after angioembolization is unknown. We hypothesized that earlier thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with increased bleeding complications without mitigating venous thromboembolism events. METHODS All blunt trauma patients who underwent splenic angioembolization within 24 hours of arrival were identified from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2017 to 2019. Cases with <24-hour length of stay, other serious injuries, and surgery before angioembolization were excluded. Venous thromboembolism was defined as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Bleeding complications were defined as splenic surgery, additional embolization, or blood transfusion after thromboprophylaxis initiation. Data were compared with χ2 analysis and multivariate logistic regression at P < .05. RESULTS In 1,102 patients, 84% had American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade III to V splenic injuries, and 73% received thromboprophylaxis. Splenic surgery after angioembolization was more common in those with thromboprophylaxis initiation within the first 24 hours (5.7% vs 1.7%, P = .007), whereas those with the initiation of thromboprophylaxis after 72 hours were more likely to have a pulmonary embolism (2.3% vs 0.2%, P = .001). Overall, venous thromboembolism increased considerably when thromboprophylaxis was initiated after day 3. In multivariate analysis, time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with bleeding (odds ratio 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94]) and venous thromboembolism complications (odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.20-1.81]). CONCLUSION This national study evaluates bleeding and thromboembolic risk to elucidate the specific timing of thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis between 24 and 72 hours achieves the safest balance in minimizing bleeding and venous thromboembolism risk, with 48 hours particularly serving as the ideal time for protocolized administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna L Collie
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL.
| | - Nicole B Lyons
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Christopher F O'Neil
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Walter A Ramsey
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Edward B Lineen
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Carl I Schulman
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Kenneth G Proctor
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Jonathan P Meizoso
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Nicholas Namias
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| | - Enrique Ginzburg
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grigorian A, Schubl S, Swentek L, Barrios C, Lekawa M, Russell D, Nahmias J. Similar rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and failure of non-operative management for early versus delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis in adolescent blunt solid organ injuries: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-023-02440-4. [PMID: 38194094 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early initiation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in adults with blunt solid organ injury (BSOI) has been demonstrated to be safe but this is controversial in adolescents. We hypothesized that adolescent patients with BSOI undergoing non-operative management (NOM) and receiving early VTE chemoprophylaxis (eVTEP) (≤ 48 h) have a decreased rate of VTE and similar rate of failure of NOM, compared to similarly matched adolescents receiving delayed VTE chemoprophylaxis (dVTEP) (> 48 h). METHODS The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for adolescents (12-17 years of age) with BSOI (liver, kidney, and/or spleen) undergoing NOM. We compared eVTEP versus dVTEP using a 1:1 propensity score model, matching for age, comorbidities, BSOI grade, injury severity score, hypotension on arrival, and need for transfusions. We performed subset analyses in patients with isolated spleen, kidney, and liver injury. RESULTS From 1022 cases, 417 (40.8%) adolescents received eVTEP. After matching, there was no difference in matched variables (all p > 0.05). Both groups had a similar rate of VTE (dVTEP 0.6% vs. eVTEP 1.7%, p = 0.16), mortality (dVTEP 0.3% vs. eVTEP 0%, p = 0.32), and failure of NOM (eVTEP 6.7% vs. dVTEP 7.3%, p = 0.77). These findings remained true in all subset analyses of isolated solid organ injury (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The rate of VTE with adolescent BSOI is exceedingly rare. Early VTE chemoprophylaxis in adolescent BSOI does not increase the rate of failing NOM. However, unlike adult trauma patients, adolescent patients with BSOI receiving eVTEP had a similar rate of VTE and death, compared to adolescents receiving dVTEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areg Grigorian
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA.
| | - Sebastian Schubl
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA
| | - Lourdes Swentek
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA
| | - Cristobal Barrios
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA
| | - Michael Lekawa
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA
| | - Dylan Russell
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffry Nahmias
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA, 92868-3298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bokenkamp M, Dorken Gallastegi A, Brown T, Hwabejire JO, Fawley J, Mendoza AE, Saillant NN, Fagenholz PJ, Kaafarani HMA, Velmahos GC, Parks JJ. Angioembolization in Severe Pelvic Trauma is Associated with Venous Thromboembolism. J Surg Res 2023; 283:540-549. [PMID: 36442253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of hemorrhage from pelvic fractures is complex and requires multidisciplinary attention. Pelvic angioembolization (AE) has become a key intervention to aid in obtaining definitive hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that pelvic AE would be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS All adults (age >16) with a severe pelvic fracture (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 4) secondary to a blunt traumatic mechanism in the 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database were included. Patients who did not receive VTE prophylaxis during their admission were excluded. Patients who underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission were compared to those who did not using propensity score matching. Matching was performed based on patient demographics, admission physiology, comorbidities, injury severity, associated injuries, other hemorrhage control procedures, and VTE prophylaxis type, and time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis. The rates of VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) were compared between the matched groups. RESULTS Of 72,985 patients with a severe blunt pelvic fracture, 1887 (2.6%) underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission versus 71,098 (97.4%) who did not. Pelvic AE patients had a higher median Injury Severity Score and more often required other hemorrhage control procedures, with laparotomy being most common (24.7%). The median time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis in pelvic AE versus no pelvic AE patients was 60.1 h (interquartile range = 36.6-98.6) versus 27.7 h (interquartile range = 13.9-52.4), respectively. After propensity score matching, pelvic AE patients were more likely to develop VTE compared to no pelvic AE patients (11.8% versus 9.5%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Pelvic AE for control of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital VTE. Patients who undergo pelvic AE are especially high risk for VTE and should be started as early as safely possible on VTE prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Bokenkamp
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ander Dorken Gallastegi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tommy Brown
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John O Hwabejire
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Fawley
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - April E Mendoza
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Noelle N Saillant
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter J Fagenholz
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Haytham M A Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George C Velmahos
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan J Parks
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Virdis F, Favi F, Wiik Larsen J, Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Pararas N, Beka SG, Bonavina L, Bova R, Pisanu A, Abu-Zidan F, Balogh Z, Chiara O, Wani I, Stahel P, Di Saverio S, Scalea T, Soreide K, Sakakushev B, Amico F, Martino C, Hecker A, de'Angelis N, Chirica M, Galante J, Kirkpatrick A, Pikoulis E, Kluger Y, Bensard D, Ansaloni L, Fraga G, Civil I, Tebala GD, Di Carlo I, Cui Y, Coimbra R, Agnoletti V, Sall I, Tan E, Picetti E, Litvin A, Damaskos D, Inaba K, Leung J, Maier R, Biffl W, Leppaniemi A, Moore E, Gurusamy K, Catena F. Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:52. [PMID: 36224617 PMCID: PMC9560023 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2017, the World Society of Emergency Surgery published its guidelines for the management of adult and pediatric patients with splenic trauma. Several issues regarding the follow-up of patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM remained unsolved.
Methods Using a modified Delphi method, we sought to explore ongoing areas of controversy in the NOM of splenic trauma and reach a consensus among a group of 48 international experts from five continents (Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, America) concerning optimal follow-up strategies in patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM.
Results Consensus was reached on eleven clinical research questions and 28 recommendations with an agreement rate ≥ 80%. Mobilization after 24 h in low-grade splenic trauma patients (WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) was suggested, while in patients with high-grade splenic injuries (WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), if no other contraindications to early mobilization exist, safe mobilization of the patient when three successive hemoglobins 8 h apart after the first are within 10% of each other was considered safe according to the panel. The panel suggests adult patients to be admitted to hospital for 1 day (for low-grade splenic injuries—WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) to 3 days (for high-grade splenic injuries—WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), with those with high-grade injuries requiring admission to a monitored setting. In the absence of specific complications, the panel suggests DVT and VTE prophylaxis with LMWH to be started within 48–72 h from hospital admission. The panel suggests splenic artery embolization (SAE) as the first-line intervention in patients with hemodynamic stability and arterial blush on CT scan, irrespective of injury grade. Regarding patients with WSES Class II blunt splenic injuries (AAST Grade III) without contrast extravasation, a low threshold for SAE has been suggested in the presence of risk factors for NOM failure. The panel also suggested angiography and eventual SAE in all hemodynamically stable adult patients with WSES Class III injuries (AAST Grades IV–V), even in the absence of CT blush, especially when concomitant surgery that requires change of position is needed. Follow-up imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound/CT scan in 48–72 h post-admission of trauma in splenic injuries WSES Class II (AAST Grade III) or higher treated with NOM was considered the best strategy for timely detection of vascular complications. Conclusion This consensus document could help guide future prospective studies aiming at validating the suggested strategies through the implementation of prospective trauma databases and the subsequent production of internationally endorsed guidelines on the issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency, Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Virdis
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Favi
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgey, Bufalini Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Johannes Wiik Larsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital University of Bergen, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Nikolaos Pararas
- Department of General Surgery, Dr Sulaiman Al Habib/Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Solomon Gurmu Beka
- School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Bova
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgey, Bufalini Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- Department of Applied Statistics, The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Zsolt Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Philip Stahel
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, AV5, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Thomas Scalea
- Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital University of Bergen, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- Research Institute of Medical University Plovdiv/University Hospital St George Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Francesco Amico
- Trauma Service, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.,The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Costanza Martino
- Department of Anesthesiology and Acute Care, Umberto I Hospital of Lugo, Ausl della Romagna, Lugo, Italy
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of General Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Joseph Galante
- Trauma Department, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care and Trauma Surgery Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- General Surgery, Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Denis Bensard
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery, San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gustavo Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Ian Civil
- Director of Trauma Services, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- Department of General Surgery, Military Teaching Hospital, Hôpital Principal Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | | | - Kenji Inaba
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jeffrey Leung
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London (UCL), London, UK.,Milton Keynes University Hospital, Milton Keynes, UK
| | | | - Walt Biffl
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ernest Moore
- Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgey, Bufalini Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|